Small home · Licensed for 6 · Los Angeles
Beit Shalom Group
1620 S Sherbourne Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90035Licensed since 2018
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 5 residents
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
- Bedridden
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 5 NON-AMBULATORY AND 1 BEDRIDDEN ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR THREE(3).
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Help with bathing or showering
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Help with dressing and grooming
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Medication storageCentrally stored
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Activities of daily living the home lists help withBathing · Grooming · Other personal needs
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated April 16, 2026.
24-hour supervision claimed
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
RN coverageOn call
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Consulting nurse arrangementRegistered nurse on call and periodic nurse visits to address resident questions and concerns.
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Clinicians who come to the homePeriodic nurse visits · Registered nurse
Periodic nurse visits — reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Registered nurse — reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Nurse coverageOn call and periodic nurse visits
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
As needs change
Medicines
Who handles medications: The home monitors and assists with medications.
beitshalomgroup.com · March 29, 2026
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Beit Shalom Group: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,750a month to start
Likely $4,750–$7,100
From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,750likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,750likely $4,750–$7,100
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,750–$7,250
- $5,750
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,550–$10,400
- $8,250
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes14 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $9,000
14 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,250–$9,000.
- Ayres Residential Care Home-Century CityLos Angeles · 2.2 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Miko InnLos Angeles · 2.6 mi · Small home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Bentley ManorLos Angeles · 3.7 mi · Mid-size home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Coastal HouseLos Angeles · 4.2 mi · Small home$9,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ladera Sunrise Care HomeLos Angeles · 4.5 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ladera VistaLos Angeles · 4.8 mi · Small home$9,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Harvard Hope HouseLos Angeles · 5.1 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The LighthouseToluca Lake · 8.1 mi · Mid-size home$2,500Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Grant Serenity of VerdugoBurbank · 8.2 mi · Small home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Atwater Village SouthLos Angeles · 8.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio with alcove · seen September 9, 2026
- Grant Serenity Homes of BurbankBurbank · 9.1 mi · Small home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Seniors' HavenBurbank · 9.3 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Palisades VillaPacific Palisades · 9.4 mi · Small home$6,400Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakridge InnGlendale · 9.4 mi · Small home$9,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (12)Private rooms · Outdoor space · Wifi
Private rooms
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Outdoor spaceGarden · Flowers · Trees for shade and privacy · Fountain · Outdoor garden
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Wifi
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Common areasLibrary · On site library
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Room typesPrivate · Semi-private · Private rooms · Semi-private rooms
Private · Semi-private — reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Private rooms · Semi-private rooms — reported on beitshalomgroup.com · seen October 27, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Residents may bring their own furniture
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
AmenitiesFlowers · Shade trees · Privacy trees · Fountain · Books (available for residents' use) · Puzzles (available for residents' use) · and 5 more
Flowers · Shade trees · Privacy trees · Fountain · Books · Puzzles · Games · Cards · Calming fountain — reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
On-site library — reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
On site library — reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Rooms come furnished
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (7)Who does the cooking · Special diets supported · Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen
Who does the cookingProfessional chef
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Special diets supportedDietary needs and preferences
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Meals provided per day3
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Snacks available
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Meals provided
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Professional chef
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (4)The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes it · Activity types offered · Activities tailored to the individual
The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes itActivities and events are continuously tailored after discussing each resident's favorite activities and interests.
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated April 16, 2026.
Activity types offeredSocial events · Squishies · Live music · Movies · Bingo · Exercise · and 2 more
Social events — reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Squishies — reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated July 29, 2026.
Live music · Movies · Bingo · Exercise · Movie · Activities — reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Activities tailored to the individual
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Exercise or fitness programExercise sessions · Daily exercise sessions · Exercise
Exercise sessions — reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Daily exercise sessions — reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Exercise — reported on beitshalomgroup.com · seen October 27, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (1)Contact form
- Open on the website
Contact form
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
About the home (3)Brand or trade name · Management company · Family-owned claim
Brand or trade nameBeit Shalom Group LLC
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Management companyBeit Shalom Group LLC
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Family-owned claim
Reported on beitshalomgroup.com · source dated March 29, 2026.
Where it is
1620 S Sherbourne Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90035Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Kaiser Foundation Hospital-West LaHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.8 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197609314 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 16 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 5 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 2 documents
Jan 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that a resident in care was receiving oxygen. Staff did not adequately supervise a resident in care.
On 01/29/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elvira Gonzalez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to further investigate the above mentioned allegations and deliver findings. LPA met with Lucy Ouw, Caregiver, explained the purpose of the visit, and was granted entry to the facility. The investigation consisted of the following: On 11/21/25, LPA Gonzalez obtained copies of the staff roster, and resident roster. LPA Gonzalez reviewed service records for resident #1 (R1) and requested the following documents: Physician’s Report, Needs and Services Plan, Admission Agreement, Death Report, Special Incident Reports, and medical records from Cedars Sinai Hospital for the visits on 09/30/25, 10/18/25. LPA Gonzalez reviewed service records for residents #2-#6 (R2-R6) and obtained copies of the following documents: Physician’s Report and Needs & Services Plan. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Additionally, LPA Gonzalez interviewed staff #1-#4 (S1-S4), residents #2-#4 (R2-R4), and attempted to interview witness #1-#2 (W1-W2). LPA Gonzalez was unable to interview R1. Furthermore, LPA Gonzalez and Lucy Ouw toured the facility. On 01/29/26, LPA Gonzalez received the following records: Physician Order Form from TLC Hospice Care, Inc. (dated: 10/25/25). The investigation revealed the following: For the allegation: Staff did not ensure that a resident in care was receiving oxygen. It is being alleged that staff did not ensure that a resident was receiving oxygen or that the resident’s oxygen levels were appropriate. On 11/21/25, LPA Gonzalez conducted interviews with S1-S4. Of those interviewed, 4 out of 4 staff denied the allegation. 4 out of 4 staff stated that they followed all physician orders and directives while caring for R1. On 11/21/25, LPA Gonzalez conducted interviews with R2-R4 and was unable to interview R1 as they passed away on 10/28/25. Of those interviewed, 3 out of 3 residents could not corroborate with the allegation. 3 out of 3 residents stated that staff is providing the necessary care and supervision. On 11/21/25, LPA Gonzalez conducted a review of records. Medical records from Cedars-Sinai Hospital dated 10/08/25 indicated that R1 was admitted on 09/30/25 due to swelling in the hands and legs and was discharged on 10/08/25 with diagnoses of Atrial Fibrillation (AFib) and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Medical records from Cedars-Sinai Hospital dated 10/25/25 noted that R1 was admitted on 10/19/25 due to low oxygen saturation levels and hypotension. R1 was discharged from the hospital on 10/25/25 under hospice care. A review of the Unusual Incident/Injury Report (UIR) dated 09/30/25 noted that R1 was experiencing severe swelling in the hands and legs and was transported to Cedars-Sinai Hospital for evaluation. The UIR dated 10/08/25 documented that R1 returned to the facility from Cedars-Sinai Hospital on 10/08/25. The UIR dated 10/19/25 indicated that R1 was transported to Cedars-Sinai Hospital due to low oxygen saturation levels observed by staff. The UIR dated 10/25/25 noted that R1 was discharged from Cedars-Sinai Hospital and returned to the facility on 10/25/25 under hospice care with comfort-focused orders. Continued on LIC9099-C The report further noted that R1’s oxygen saturation levels remained low upon discharge and required continuous oxygen to maintain comfort and adequate breathing. Staff ensured oxygen therapy was administered immediately upon arrival per physician and hospice orders. The UIR dated 10/28/25 noted that staff observed R1 with very low oxygen saturation levels despite continuous oxygen therapy, and R1 passed away that afternoon. A review of the Death Report (LIC 624), dated 11/03/25, reported that R1 passed away on 10/28/25 at 5:30 p.m., with contributing factors noted as Alzheimer’s disease and decline. On 01/29/26, LPA Gonzalez received and conducted a review of Physician Order Form from TLC Hospice Care, Inc. (dated: 10/25/25). Record revealed that R1 was prescribed oxygen inhalation as needed for shortness of breath. Based observation, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, there is not enough evidence to support the above allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the above allegation is unsubstantiated. For the allegation: Staff did not adequately supervise a resident in care. It is alleged that a resident with Diabetes was able to access a large amount of sweets at the facility without staff awareness. On 11/21/25, LPA Gonzalez conducted interviews with S1-S4. Of those interviewed, 4 out of 4 staff denied the allegation. 4 out of 4 staff said they follow the resident’s restrictive diets. 4 out of 4 staff said residents do not have access to a large amount of candy or sweets. An interview with S1 revealed that staff supervise residents and take precautions to ensure resident safety. S1 stated that ongoing training is provided to facility caregivers and that staff attempt to follow the household menu as closely as possible. S1 reported that residents’ prescribed diets are posted above each resident’s bed and on the resident’s room door. S1 further stated that staff may advise and remind residents regarding their dietary needs; however, staff do not have control over residents’ decisions to order takeout food or purchase their own groceries, which S1 stated is the residents’ right. Continued on LIC9099-C On 11/21/25, LPA Gonzalez conducted interviews with R2-R4 and was unable to interview R1 as they passed away on 10/28/25. Of those interviewed, 3 out of 3 residents could not corroborate with the allegation. 3 out of 3 residents said that facility staff follow their restrictive diet. 3 out of 3 residents stated that staff is providing the necessary care and supervision. On 11/21/25, LPA Gonzalez conducted a tour of the facility. No large quantities of sweets were observed to be accessible to residents. During the tour, LPA observed residents during lunch being served a well-balanced meal consisting of chicken, rice, and vegetables. Based observation, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, there is not enough evidence to support the above allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the above allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited during this investigation. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2026 · control 11-AS-20251114151650
Jan 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 01/29/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elvira Gonzalez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Lucy Ouw, Caregiver, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA was granted entry to the facility.The facility is licensed to serve six (6) non- ambulatory residents of which (1) maybe bedridden and an approved hospice waiver for 1 resident. There are currently 6 residents in the facility. The facility is a single story home consisting of the following: Four (4) resident bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, living room, dining room , kitchen, laundry room and an outdoor shaded patio area in the front of the home. LPA Gonzalez toured the entire facility. All resident bedrooms were inspected. LPA observed the bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. Resident bathrooms were inspected and observed to be within Title 22 regulations. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, shower was free of mold/mildew and a non-skid mat was in place. The water temperature properly measured between 105.0 F and 120.0 F. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards; doorways were free of obstructions. The kitchen was inspected and observed to be within Title 22 regulations. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked. All cleaning solutions, sharps, hazardous items, and medications were securely locked and inaccessible to residents. Continued on LIC809-C Smoke detectors were working properly and fire extinguisher was fully charged. Carbon monoxide detector was operational. First Aid kit along with manual was available. Outside grounds were toured and no bodies of water were observed. Walkways around the home were clear of hazards. LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. LPA observed screening protocols for visitors, staff, and residents, and sanitizing stations in common areas and restrooms. LPA observed the facility has a 30-day supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). All mandated inspection control posters were posted. The facility's annual Licensing Fees are current. During todays visit LPA did not observe any deficiencies. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2026
The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jan 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff mishandled a resident's medication Staff unlawfully evicted a resident Staff is not meeting a resident's continence needs Staff are not providing adequate transportation to medical appointments
Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) conducted an unannounced visit to Beit Shalom Group Facility on 01/23/2025 and was greeted by Administrator Miriam Rudes (S1). CCLD staff explained the purpose of this visit is to deliver the findings pertaining to the above-mentioned allegations. The investigation consisted of the following: CCLD staff interviewed Administrator (S1), staff (S1-S3), residents (R1-R6). CCLD staff requested and reviewed copies of the following: Physician Report (dated 08/22/2023), Needs and Service plan (dated 09/01/2024), admission agreement (date 01/09/2025), incident reports (date 12/21/2025 to 1/8/2025), Medication administration record (MAR) (date 01/2025) for 1out of 6 residents. CCLD staff toured the facility with S1. The investigation revealed the following: Unsubstantiated Regarding Allegation #1: Staff mishandled a resident’s medication. It is being alleged that staff mishandled 1 out of 6 resident medications. During the investigation CCLD staff toured the facility and noted no negative interactions between staff and residents. CCLD staff reviewed physician report (date 12/13/2024), needs and service plan (date 12/23/2024), admission agreement (date 01/09/2025), incident reports (date 12/21/2024 to 1/8/2025), MAR (date 1/2025) for 1 out of 6 residents. CCLD staff reviewed resident MAR and could not find any medication errors. 3 out of 3 staff denied the allegation and staff indicate that staff has never had any issues with any resident medications. 3 out of 6 residents indicate no issues regarding medications. 3 out of 6 residents could not be interviewed due to cognitive issues. Regarding allegation #2: Staff unlawfully evicted a resident. It is being alleged that a staff unlawfully evicted 1 out of 6 residents. During the investigation CCLD staff toured the facility and noted no negative interactions between staff and residents. CCLD staff reviewed physician report (date 12/13/2024), needs and service plan (date 12/23/2024), admission agreement (date 01/09/2025) for 1 out of 6 residents. CCLD staff could not locate any eviction notice given to resident. 3 out of 3 staff denied the allegation and staff indicate that staff never evicted any resident. 3 out of 6 residents indicate that staff has never evicted them for cause. 3 out of 6 residents could not be interviewed due to cognitive issues. Regarding Allegation #3: Staff is not meeting a residents continence need. It is being alleged that staff is not meeting 1 out of 6 residents continence needs. During the investigation CCLD staff toured the facility and noted no negative interactions between staff and residents. CCLD staff reviewed physician report (date 12/13/2024), needs and service plan (date 12/23/2024), admission agreement (date 01/09/2025) for 1 out of 6 residents. CCLD staff reviewed admission agreement for resident, facility states that incontinence supplies are not supplied by facility. Reviewed email between facility and resident conservator date 1/10/2025, email suggest that the facility will order supplies with insurance and resident family will need to pay for supplies not covered by insurance. 3 out of 3 staff denied the allegation and staff indicate that staff never had any issues with resident incontinence needs. 3 out of 6 residents indicate that they do not need incontinence supplies. 3 out of 6 residents could not be interviewed due to cognitive issues. Regarding Allegation #4: Staff are not providing adequate transportation to medical appointments. It is being alleged that staff are not providing 1 out of 6 residents transportation to medical appointments. During the investigation CCLD staff toured the facility and noted no negative interactions between staff and residents. CCLD staff reviewed physician report (date 12/13/2024), needs and service plan (date 12/23/2024), admission agreement (date 01/09/2025) for 1 out of 6 residents. CCLD staff reviewed admission agreement, page 1 section 2 “basic services”, indicates plan and arrange transportation to medical and dental appointments (paid by client), which was signed by resident conservator on 1/10/2025. 3 out of 3 staff denied the allegation and staff indicate that staff does not provide transportation for resident’s doctors’ appointments. 3 out of 6 residents indicate that staff does supply transportation for doctors’ appointments. 3 out of 6 residents could not be interviewed due to cognitive issues. Based on interviews, observations, and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met; therefore, the allegations of “staff mishandled a resident’s medication”, “staff unlawfully evicted a resident”, “staff is not meeting a residents continence need”, “staff are not providing adequate transportation to medical appointments” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was provided to the Administrator Miriam Rudes S1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2025 · control 11-AS-20250120231723
20245 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sparkle Day conducted an unannounced visit to the above facility. The purpose of today’s visit was to conduct the one-year inspection. LPA met with Miriam Rudes, Administrator and the purpose of the visit was discussed. Facility is licensed to serve 6 non- ambulatory residents of which (1) maybe bedridden and an approved hospice waiver for 1 resident. (1) of the residents are diagnosed with dementia, 2 residents are receiving home health and (1) resident receives hospice care services. The facility does not handle any of the residents’ money. This home is a single story home consisting of: (4) resident bedrooms, (2) bathroom, living room, dining room , kitchen, laundry room and an outdoor shaded patio area in the front of the home. LPA toured the Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. Resident bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, shower was free of mold/mildew and a non-skid mat was in place, water temperature measured at 108.1F. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards; doorways were free of obstructions. Kitchen was checked and observed to be within Title 22 regulations. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked. All cleaning solutions, hazardous items, and medications were securely locked and inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors were working properly and fire extinguisher was fully charged. Carbon monoxide detector was operational. First Aid kit was available. Outside grounds were toured and no bodies of water were observed. Walkways around the home were clear of hazards. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. During todays visit LPA did not observe any deficiencies. Exit interview conducted with Lucy Ouw, caregiverthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2024
Oct 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident received his cash resources
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pamela Bunker conducted an unannounced complaint visit on Monday, December 09, 2024, to amend the original complaint reports dated 08/28/2024 and 10/03/2024. This amended complaint report LIC9099 and LIC9099Cs dated 12/09/2024 will supersede the original documents. Upon arrival at the facility. LPA Bunker called the facility via telephone and conducted a risk assessment Based on the evaluation, the facility is cleared of COVID-19 infection. LPA Bunker met with staff Ina Hamsiah. LPA Bunker explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with staff members 1-2 (S1-S2) and residents 1-5 (R1-R5). LPA Bunker asked questions relevant to the nature of the complaint. S1 stated that the resident received all cash resources but would leave the facility for days without picking up the checks. S2 states that she was not aware of the incident, as she did not work at the facility during that time. LPA Bunker reviewed and observed the resident's records and requested copies of supporting documents. See continued LIC9099-C page 2 Unsubstantiated Continued LIC9099-C page 2 Allegation: Staff did not ensure that the resident received his cash resources Interviews were conducted with staff members S1 and S2, as well as residents R1 through R5. who stated that residents received all their cash resources. S1 stated that R1 received all cash resources and explained that she provided R1 with his checks, which he refused to pick up. S1 further stated that R1 had a bank account with Bank of America, where R1 SSI checks were deposited. S1 stated that R1 was not cashing the checks and would often leave the facility for several days or even up to a week. S1 denied owing R1 $3,000.00, referencing a letter from R1 stating, “To tell you the truth, I straight forgot about them. Please send me another set.” S1 stated that R1 provided a new mailing address, and the checks were sent to R1's current address. S1 stated that R1 moved out in March 2023. S1 stated that this incident occurred two years ago and was reported to Community Care Licensing and other appropriate agencies in a timely manner. S1 stated that the issue had been resolved. Residents 2-5 (R2-R5) stated they had no issue with their cash resources, as their family members handled their finances. In an interview with R1, R1 admitted to receiving cash resources and stated that the complaint was made out of frustration and anger. R1 acknowledged that all money was received and that the issue had since been resolved prior to the complaint. LPA Pamela Bunker requested, observed, and conducted a thorough review of the resident's file folder, including the physician's report, medical records, admission agreement, identification and emergency information, contact information, medication log, Medication Administration Records (MARs), medical assessment, consent forms, release of resident medical information, appraisal/needs and services plan, safeguards for cash resources, preplacement appraisal information, unusual incident reports, copies of the SSI checks, and the letter from R1 dated 09/12/2023. See continued LIC9099-C page 3 Continued LIC9099-C page 3 Investigation revealed the following: Staff 1-2 (S1-S2) and residents 1-5 (R1-R5) interviews all stated that they received all of their cash resources. S1 stated she was not sued and had no court documents. She explained that she provided R1 with his checks, which R1 refused to pick up. S1 also stated that R1 had a bank account with Bank of America, where R1 would deposit SSI checks directly. S1 and R1 had no court documents for LPA to review. LPA was provided with copies of the checks and a letter from R1 admitting not picking up the checks. S1 stated that R1 checks were at the facility. S1 stated that R1 was not cashing the checks and would often leave the facility for days, sometimes up to a week. S1 denied owing R1 $3,000.00, citing a letter from R1 in which he wrote, “To tell you the truth, I straight forgot about them. Please send me another set.” R1 provided a new mailing address, and the checks were sent to R1's current address. S1 stated that R1 left the facility of his own free will, and S1 stated she even assisted R1 in finding a new placement at a nice facility in the valley. S1 explained that this incident occurred two years ago and was reported to Community Care Licensing and all relevant agencies promptly. S1 emphasized that the issue had already been resolved. R1 acknowledged that checks were received and stated that the issue had been resolved prior to this complaint. S1 denied the allegation that staff did not ensure residents received their cash resources. Based on interviews, available evidence, observation, information received, and records reviewed there was not enough sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. Copies of the Complaint Investigation Report LIC9099 and LIC9099-Cs were provided to staff. There were no deficiencies cited. Exit interview conductedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024 · control 11-AS-20231018105832
Aug 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident received his cash resources
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pamela Bunker conducted an unannounced complaint visit on Wednesday, August 28, 2024. Upon arrival at the facility. LPA Bunker called the facility via telephone and conducted a Risk Assessment. Based on the assessment, the facility is cleared of COVID-19 infection. LPA Bunker met with staff Ina Hamsiah and spoke to the Licensee Miriam Rudes via telephone. LPA Bunker explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews conducted with staff members 1-2 (S1-S2) and residents 2-5 (R1-R5). S1 stated that the resident received all cash resources but would leave the facility for days without picking up the checks. S2 stated that she was not aware of the incident, as she did not work at the facility during that time. LPA Bunker reviewed and observed the resident's records and requested copies of supporting documents. See continued LIC9099-C page 2 Unsubstantiated Continued LIC9099-C page 2 Allegation: Staff did not ensure that the resident received his cash resources Interviews were conducted with staff members S1 and S2, as well as residents R1 through R5. who stated that residents received all their cash resources. S1 stated that R1 received all cash resources and explained that she provided R1 with his checks, which he refused to pick up. S1 further stated that R1 had a bank account with Bank of America, where R1 SSI checks were deposited. S1 stated that R1 was not cashing the checks and would often leave the facility for several days or weeks. S1 denied owing R1 $3,000.00, referencing a letter from R1 stating, “To tell you the truth, I straight forgot about them. Please send me another set.” S1 stated that R1 provided a new mailing address, and the checks were sent to R1's current address. S1 stated that R1 moved out in March 2023. S1 stated that this incident occurred two years ago and was reported to Community Care Licensing and other appropriate agencies in a timely manner. S1 stated that the issue had been resolved. Residents 2-5 (R2-R5) stated they had no issue with their cash resources, as their family members handled their finances. In an interview with R1, he admitted to receiving cash resources and stated that the complaint was made out of frustration and anger. R1 acknowledged that all money was received and that the issue had since been resolved prior to the complaint. LPA Pamela Bunker requested, observed, and conducted a thorough review of the resident's file folder, including the physician's report, medical records, admission agreement, identification and emergency information, contact information, medication log, Medication Administration Records (MARs), medical assessment, consent forms, release of resident medical information, appraisal/needs and services plan, safeguards for cash resources, preplacement appraisal information, unusual incident reports, copies of the SSI checks, and the letter from R1 dated 09/12/2023. See continued LIC9099-C page 3 Continued LIC9099-C page 3 Due to time constraints, LPA was unable to complete the visit and will return back at a later date to complete the visit. Copies of the Complaint Investigation Report LIC9099 and LIC9099-Cs were provided to staff. There were no deficiencies cited. Exit interview conductedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2024 · control 11-AS-20231018105832
Jul 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained pressure injuries while in care. Facility staff did not follow resident's care instructions. Facility staff did not properly bathe resident.
On 07/22/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elvira Gonzalez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to gather information pertaining to the above-mentioned allegations and deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Miriam Rudes and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 03/28/23, LPA Lourdes Montoya reviewed five resident files, and three staff files, and obtained copies of the resident’s roster, staff roster and resident records. LPA Montoya conducted interviews with residents #2-#4 (R2-R4), and attempted to interview residents #1, #5, and #6 (R1, R5, R6). LPA interfviewed witness #1 (W1) and staff #1-#3 (S1-S3). Furthermore, LPA Montoya and Administrator Miriam Rudes toured the inside and outside grounds of the facility. On 07/22/24, LPA Gonzalez attempted to interview reporting party and R1. LPA Gonzalez also requested the Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (LIC625) for resident R1. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: Allegation: Resident sustained pressure injuries while in care. It is alleged that a resident was at this facility during the dates of 03/15/23-03/22/23 and came home with sores on their buttocks and resident is not able to fully extend their left leg. On 03/28/23 LPA Montoya interviewed S1-S3. (3) out (3) staff said that there were no residents who sustained pressure injuries while in care during the dates of 03/15/23-03/22/23. On 03/28/23 LPA Montoya interviewed R2-R4 and asked if they knew or were aware of any resident sustaining injuries while in care at the facility. (3) out of (3) residents interviewed revealed that no resident had sustained injuries while in care. On 07/22/24 LPA Elvira Gonzalez conducted an interview with Administrator Miriam Rudes and it revealed that R1 was not on hospice or home health during their stay at this facility between the dates of 03/15/23 and 03/22/23. Administrator Rudes stated that when R1 was brought to the facility they had no visible pressure injuries but appeared to be very frail and delicate. On 07/22/24 LPA Gonzalez reviewed the Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, Physician’s Report for resident R1. Physician’s Report (dated 03/14/23) revealed that R1 requires assistance with all activities of daily living, which includes bathing, toileting, eating, drinking, and medication administration. Physician’s Report also revealed that R1 has a history of skin condition or breakdown with a note under the explanation column stating the buttocks and that R1 had a recent hip fracture. Based on interviews conducted with facility staff, facility clients, and LPA record review, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Continued on LIC9099-C Allegation: Facility staff did not follow resident's care instructions. It is alleged that this facility did not follow instructions in caring for the resident. On 03/28/23 LPA Montoya interviewed S1-S3. (3) out (3) staff said that they follow each resident’s plan of care. On 03/28/23 LPA Montoya interviewed R2-R4 and asked if staff do not follow resident’s care instructions. (3) out of (3) residents interviewed revealed that staff do follow the resident’s care instructions. On 07/22/24 LPA Elvira Gonzalez conducted an interview with Administrator Miriam Rudes and it revealed that the each resident has a plan of care written and is followed thoroughly. Miriam Rudes stated that when R1 arrived at the facility, the facility was provided with a food and beverage thickener from the family. She stated that staff at this facility did use the thickener. Miriam Rudes said that staff made sure that R1 was more than comfortable during their short stay at this facility. Based on interviews conducted with facility staff, facility clients, and LPA record review, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Allegation: Facility staff did not properly bathe resident. It is alleged that a resident was not bathed properly during their stay at this facility. On 03/28/23 LPA Montoya interviewed S1-S3. (3) out (3) staff said that they do bathe residents. On 03/28/23 LPA Montoya interviewed R2-R4 and asked if staff properly bathe residents. (3) out of (3) residents interviewed revealed that staff do properly bathe residents. On 07/22/24 LPA Elvira Gonzalez conducted an interview with Administrator Miriam Rudes and it revealed that the depending on the residents care needs is how often they are bathed. For a bedridden resident they are given a bed bath 3-4 times a week, and if the resident denies a bath, it is not forced. Based on interviews conducted with facility staff, facility clients, and LPA record review, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Based on interviews conducted with facility staff, facility clients, and LPA record review there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held. A copy of the report was provided to Caregiver, Ina Hamsiah.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2024 · control 11-AS-20230327091711
Jan 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 1/26/2024 at around 10:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Socorro Leandro conducted an unannounced Required – 1 Year Inspection to the above-named facility and met with Licensee/Administrator Miriam Rudes. LPA explained the purpose of the visit and was accompanied by a Caregiver inside and outside the facility during this inspection. This facility is licensed to serve 6 adults ages 60 and over, of which 5 may be non-ambulatory and 1 bedridden. A total of 6 residents are currently residing in this facility. The Annual Licensing Fees are current. The facility is a one-story house located in a residential street. The home consists of 4 resident bedrooms, 1 resident bathroom, 1 living/dining room, 1 kitchen, 1 entrance room, 1 laundry room, 1 staff bathroom, and 1 front patio area with shaded seating. Outside grounds were toured and no bodies of water were observed. The patio furniture is under a shaded area and accessible to residents. Walkways around the home were clear of hazards. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and fresh perishable foods for a minimum of two days. Knives and toxins were kept in locked storage cabinet. LPA observed that medications were safe, locked, and inaccessible. All medications observed were labeled and maintained in compliance with label instructions and State and Federal law. Documents are posted as mandated. Last fire drill was conducted on 11/03/2023. First aid kit is fully stocked. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were in compliance and operational. There are two fire extinguishers one is the entrance room and the other is in the kitchen. 4 out of 4 resident’s bedrooms were checked. Mattresses were in good condition, adequate lighting, plenty of dresser and closet space observed. Walls and floors were clean and in good condition. Comforters, bed linen, bath towels and mattress protectors were adequately stocked. Bathroom toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, and a non-skid mat was in place. Adequate lighting and toiletries accessible to residents. LPA tested hot water temperature and it measured between 105 and 120 degrees Fahrenheit. This facility provides residents with hygiene products such as feminine napkins, nonmedicated soap, toilet paper, toothbrush, toothpaste, and comb. 5 staff records were reviewed, 5 out of 5 staff records had Criminal Record Clearances, Job Application, Education Information, and Health Screening reports. 5 resident records were reviewed and, 5 out of 5 resident records had Admission Agreements and Medical Assessments, Consent Forms, Weight Record, Emergency Information, Tuberculosis Test, and Centrally Stored Medication Destruction Record. No deficiencies are being cited based on LPA observation, interviews conducted and record review in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Tittle 22. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left with the Caregiver.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 26, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 8 documents
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 11, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff is disclosing resident sensitive information to third parties Facility staff fails to follow infection protocols
On 09/11/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mario Leon conducted an unanounced complaint visit at the above facility. LPA was met by LUCY SETIAWAN (Staff two - S2), caregiver, and later by MIRIAM RUDES (Staff one - S1), Administrator, and the purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Leon toured the facility inside and out, interviewed three (3) staff (S1-S3) and four (4) residents (R1-R4). LPA also interviewed one witness (W1). LPA Leon requested and reviewed facility documents which included resident roster, staff roster, infection control plan and doctor's orders. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: Facility staff is disclosing resident sensitive information to third parties. It has been alleged that the facility staff are disclosing resident sensitive information to third parties. LPA Leon interviewed three (3) staff members and all three (3) have denied the allegation. LPA Leon interviewed four (4) residents and three (3) out of four (4) residents have denied the allegation. LPA Leon interviewed one witness who was also unaware of the allegation. According to LPA's observations, interviews and record review conducted, there is not enough evidence to support the above allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the above allegation is Unsubstatiated. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Facility staff fails to follow infection protocols. It has been alleged that the facility staff are failing to follow the infection control protocol. LPA observed one bath aide fully donned in gown, pants, booties, gloves and hair net conducting a bathing session on one resident. LPA also observed all staff wearing face masks and all staff using separate nitrile gloves while conducting work with different residents. LPA interviewed three staff (S1-S3) and one witness (W1). All staff have denied the allegation and have provided sufficient information to follow infection control policy. Therefore three (3) out of four (4) interviewees have not supported this allegation. LPA Leon observed the infection control policies for the facility and have observed one infected resident (R1), bedridden, isolated within their room. According to S1, the facility does not allow any visitors through 09/11/23 and all six (6) residents are currently using doctor's ordered medication to prevent further spread of the infection to the remainder of the community. According to LPA's observations, interviews and record review conducted, there is not enough evidence to support the above allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the above allegation is Unsubstatiated. An exit interview was held with Administrator, Miriam Rudes, and a copy of this report has been provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2023 · control 11-AS-20230901112957
Aug 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not following proper infection precautions with resident in care Staff made false statements about resident in care Staff did no report resident's hospitalization to appropriate parties
On 8/30/2023 LPA Alfonso Iniguez conducted and unannounced complaint visit. LPA Iniguez meet with Mariam Rudes/Administrator. LPA explained the purpose of this visit. Investigation Consisted of: LPA conducted interviews with Resident (R#1-R#3), Administrator(A#1), and Staff (S#1-S#2). Hospice Company (HC), R#1 son (W#1). LPA obtained and reviewed R#1-R#3 Physicians Report, R#1-R#3 Medication Administration Record August 2023, R#1-R#3 Needs and Services Plans, client roster, staff roster, Facility’s emergency plan, facility’s infection control plan, R#4 laboratory test results from 7/31/23, DPH steps on how to handle the spread of scabies, doctor’s orders for prescribed medications(ointment and shampoo), UIR from various dates (5/1/2023-8/29/23), administrator written stamen and facility contact list. Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Investigation Revealed the Following: Allegation: Staff are not following proper infection precautions with resident in care. The details of the complaint alleged that facility staff did not take the appropriate precautions in dealing with an active infection. During the physical tour, LPA observed (R#4) in quarantine and alone in her room; she is bedridden. The care staff changed her adult diapers and gave her baths in her room. No other resident resides in the room at the moment or since she was diagnosed with the infection. LPA also observed proper infection precautions being taken by the staff; they were wearing disposable gloves and gowns when entering her room and an adequate place to discard them after use. No outside visitors and residents are allowed inside the quarantine area. During the records review, LPA observed the test results from (R#4); test results were negative or "None seen" on 7/31/23. Also, LPA reviewed the facility's emergency disaster plan for residential care facilities for the elderly and the facility's infection control plan; both plans were submitted on 6/24/22. In addition, LPA reviewed the printout from the Department of Public Health on how to handle the spread of scabies. House doctor (W#3) orders regarding the prescribed ointment and shampoo for all residents and staff. During an interview with the Administrator, she stated that on 8/18/23, they learned (R#4) was diagnosed with an active case of scabies by a dermatologist. When (R#4) tested positive, they immediately contacted the house doctor and followed his orders. The House doctor prescribed an ointment and shampoo for all residents and staff. The facility and house doctor were in constant communication. In addition, on 8/18/23-8/21/23, the facility contacted LA DPH, but since no one returned their calls, they left voicemails. Since no one from DPH returned their calls, the Administrator stated that they went to the DPH website and followed their instructions on caring for patients with scabies. During interviews with staff (S#1-S#3), 3 out of 3 stated that the facility follows proper infection precautions, and they are aware of a resident who has an active case of scabies. Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C During interviews with residents (R#2-R#3), 3 out of 3 stated the facility follows proper infection precautions. In addition, 2 out of 3 stated they are aware of a resident in quarantine with an active case of scabies. During an interview with the house doctor (W3), he stated that the moment the facility contacted him regarding (R#4) having an active case of scabies, he immediately gave instructions to the facility and prescribed a medical ointment and shampoo for all the residents and staff at the facility. In addition, he stated that the facility administrator and he were in constant communication regarding the active case in the facility. (W3) also stated that (W1) was unhappy with his services, so he found another hospice company and doctor. During an interview with (W1), he stated that the facility and the staff do not know how to handle proper infection control procedures, and he is looking to relocate his mother to another facility. During the Interview with the Hospice representative (W2), she stated that on 7/24/23, they ran a test on (R#4) to see if she had an active infection of scabies; the test came back negative or "None saw" on 7/31/2023. Allegation: Staff made false statements about resident in care. The details of the complaint alleged that staff stated a resident passed away without being truthful. During interview with Administrator (A#1), she stated that she has not made false statements in the past regarding the death of a resident in care. During interviews with staff (S#1-S#3) 3 out of 3 stated that the facility administrator has never made false statements regarding a resident's death. During interviews with residents (R#1-R#3), 3 out of 3 stated that they don't think the administrator has made false statement about the passing of a resident in care. Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C Allegation: Staff did no report resident's hospitalization to appropriate parties. The details of the complaint alleged that the facility sent hospice residents to the hospital without letting the hospice company and family members know. During interviews with the administrator, Miriam Rudes (A#1), she stated that she has knowledge of hospice services and how hospice functions. “Once a resident is in hospice, they care for everything.” In addition, (A#1) mentioned that she has more than six years of experience dealing with hospice patients and companies. Also, (A#1) stated that she has never sent a hospice patient to the hospital without letting the hospice company or the representative know about it. During interviews with staff (S#1-S#3), 3 out of 3 stated that the facility knows about hospice services and how it works. Also, 3 out of 3 stated the facility follows the hospice procedures. During interviews with residents (R#1-R#3), 3 out of 3 residents responded that the facility handles the resident’s medical care properly and they feel the facility will take care of their medical needs properly. During an interview with the Hospice representative (W2), she stated that on 7/31/23, (W#1) decided to take (R#4) to the hospital. He noted that his mother has scabies. (W#2) advised (W#1) that since (R#4) is under hospice care, the hospice services will be terminated; (W#1) went ahead and took (R#4) to the hospital and hired a new hospice company. During this investigation, LPA found did not find sufficient evident to support the above-mentioned allegations. Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8). An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to - Luci Setiawan-Caregiverthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2023 · control 11-AS-20230824143749
Jan 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonia Alvizar conducted an unannounced Annual required visit with a primary focus on infection control measures. LPA conducted risk assessment at the front door of the facility with Caregiver, Nancy Ogemba. Nancy stated, "No COVID-19 in the facility". LPA was met by staff, Eilat Nahum then later Administrator, Miriam Rudes joined us and the purpose of today’s visit was explained. The facility is for the elderly and licensed to serve 6 residents ages 60 and over. 5 Non-Ambulatory and 1 Bedridden only. Hospice Waiver for three. There are currently (6) Residents that are at the facility. The Facility is a single -story structure located in a residential neighborhood. It consists of the following: 4 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, living room, kitchen and living room, laundry room, outdoor patio covered area. LPA and staff toured the physical plant. There are no bodies of water or firearm/ammunition on the premises. All client rooms were checked. Beds and bedding were in good condition, adequate lighting provided, storage for client personal belongings was observed. Walls and floors were in good repair. Bed linens, comforters, and bath towels were adequately stocked at the time of visit. Bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were clean and operational. The water temperature measured 109.4 F and bathroom #2 115.0 F.A comfortable temperature is maintained in the facility. LPA observed the facility to be clean and appropriately furnished at the time of visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning agents, toxins, and sharps were inaccessible to clients. The kitchen was inspected and there was enough perishable and non-perishable food available which is stored properly. Fire extinguisher was charged, smoke detectors and Carbon Monoxide were operable. Continued on LIC 809.C During the visit, LPA observed the facility infection control practices. LPA observed screening protocols for visitors, staff and residents, sanitizing stations (Located in common areas). LPA observed staff were wearing face coverings, an isolation room and required postings throughout the facility. LPA observed the facility has a 30-day supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Administrator, Miriam provided LPA with a copy of the facility Liability Insurance Quote. LPA advised the Administrator to continuously monitor the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website and Community Care Likening Provider Informational Notices (PIN) for any updates relating to COVID-19 guidance. No deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22, Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to Administrator, Miriam Rudesthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 6, 2023
20223 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 3, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff threw water on resident while in care. Staff yelled at resident in care.
On 10/03/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Troy Agard conducted a subsequent complaint investigation to address the allegations listed above. LPA Agard met with Leah Goldsmith, Caregiver and explained the purpose of this visit is to deliver findings. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Agard conducted a tour of the facility grounds. The facility is a single story family style dwelling that consist of 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms, living room, kitchen, laundry room and outside shaded patio in front. The facility is licensed for 6 individuals. LPA interviewed staff, and residents, and reviewed records. LPA Agard requested the following documents, which were received by the due date: 1) Staff and Resident roster, 2) incident reports from the last 30 days. 3) Copy of R1’s file. Cont. on 9099C Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: Staff threw water on resident while in care. “It’s being alleged a staff threw water in a residents face.” LPA Agard attempted interviews with 4 out of 5 residents in total. 3 out of 5 denied the allegation to be true. R1 was unavailable for an interview. R2 was unable to participate due to their cognitive abilities. R3 states, “they are very nice to me here and never observed a staff throwing things. R4 states, “never seen anyone throwing anything let alone water.” R5 denied the allegation. “No”. During interviews with the staff, LPA interviewed 2 out of 7 staff in total. 2 out of 2 denied the allegation to be true. S1 states R1 used to live here but doesn’t know where they are since they left for the hospital. No one ever threw water at R1. S2 states, “the water thing is a lie.” The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: Staff yelled at resident in care. “It’s being alleged that a staff yelled at a resident in care.” 3 out of 5 denied the allegation to be true. R1 was unavailable for an interview. R2 was unable to participate due to their cognitive abilities. R3 states, I’ve never overheard a staff yelling. R4 states, “staff are well behaved. I hear voices talking loudly and laughing but haven’t seen anyone yelling.” R5 states, “no, none of that here.” During interviews with the staff, LPA interviewed 2 out of 7 staff in total. 2 out of 2 denied the allegation to be true. S1 states, “no staff ever yelled at R1. No sir!’ S2 states, “never, never.” LPA Agard reviewed the following records: A staff roster dated for October 2022; all staff interviewed match roster. LPA reviewed a resident roster dated for July 2022, all residents match with roster. LPA reviewed incident reports from the past 60 days. No reports, reporting any residents that experienced verbal or physical abuse by a staff was observed. LPA reviewed R1’s file and tried to make contact with former resident and next of kin. LPA was unsuccessful. Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2022 · control 11-AS-20220916163352
Sep 26, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 09/26/2022 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Troy Agard conducted a case management-deficiency visit. LPA met with Caregiver, Rufina Eguchi and explained the purpose of the visit. During an investigation LPA was informed by the caregiver, who was informed by a representative, the Licensee and Administrator would not be available and able to assist in the investigation and obtain records due to a religious holiday. Caregiver stated Administration will not be available until Wednesday, 09/26/2022. Thus, leaving the facility without a designated substitute who shall have qualifications adequate to be responsible and accountable for management and administration of the facility in their absence. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), deficiencies were observed, and citations were issued (ref. LIC 9099-D). An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report and appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87405(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 28, 2022
87405 Administrator - Qualifications and Duties a) All facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator. The licensee and the administrator may be one and the same person...shall be on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit ... When the administrator is not in the facility, there shall be coverage by a designated substitute who shall have qualifications adequate to be responsible and accountable for management and administration of the facility as specified in this section.... This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interview w/ caregiver, the facility will be without administration until Wednesday. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2022
Plan of correction: Facility will develop a plan on how they will ensure there will be administration or a designee at all times, not just limited to holidays. Plan will be submitted to LPA Agard via email or fax by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87755(c) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 28, 2022
87755 Inspection Authority of the Licensing Agency. (c) The licensing agency shall have the authority to inspect, audit, and copy resident or facility records upon demand during normal business hours. Records may be removed if necessary for copying. Removal of records shall be subject to the requirements in Sections 87412(f), 87506(d), and 87508(b). This requirement was not met as evidence by: an attempted reocord review. LPA was unable to gain access to records during an investigation due to administration or a designee being onsite or available by phone.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2022
Plan of correction: Facility will develop a plan on how they will ensure there will be administration or a designee available to assist in providing records. Plan will be submitted to LPA Agard via email or fax by POC due date.
Jan 27, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martessa Brown and Licensing Program LPM Janae Hammond conducted an unannounced Annual required visit with a primary focus on infection control measures. LPA was met by Miriam Rudes, Administrator and the purpose of today’s visit was explained. The facility is for the elderly and licensed to serve 6 residents ages 60 and over. 5 Non-Ambulatory and 1 Bedridden only. Hospice Waiver for three. There are currently (5) Residents that are at the facility. The Facility is a single -story structure located in a residential neighborhood. It consists of the following: 5 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, living room, kitchen and living room, laundry room, outdoor patio covered area. LPA, LPM and staff toured the physical plant. There are no bodies of water or firearm/ammunition on the premises. All client rooms were checked. Beds and bedding were in good condition, adequate lighting provided, storage for client personal belongings was observed. Walls and floors were in good repair. Bed linens, comforters, and bath towels were adequately stocked at the time of visit. Bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were clean and operational. The water temperature measured 115 F and bathroom #2 135 F.A comfortable temperature is maintained in the facility. LPA observed the facility to be clean and appropriately furnished at the time of visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning agents, toxins, and sharps were inaccessible to clients. The kitchen was inspected and there is a enough perishable and non-perishable food available which is stored properly. Fire extinguisher was charged, smoke detectors and Carbon Monoxide were operable. During the visit, LPA observed the facility infection control practices. LPA observed screening protocols for visitors, staff and residents, sanitizing stations ( Located in common areas and restrooms). LPA observed staff and residents were wearing face coverings, an isolation room and required postings throughout the facility. LPA observed the facility has a 30-day supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). LPA advised the Administrator to continuously monitor the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website and Community Care Likening Provider Informational Notices (PIN) for any updates relating to COVID-19 guidance. During today’s visit there were no deficiencies observed. Exit interview held. A copy of the report was provided to Diana Fernando Caregiver.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2022
Jan 27, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
The narrative section of the state’s online copy of this report is blank.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(3)(c) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 7, 2022
87411 Personnel Requirements - General (3) The training shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (c) All RCFE staff who assist residents with personal activities of daily living shall receive at least ten hours of initial training within the first four weeks of employment and at least four hours annually thereafter. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on observation LPA did not observed current training records for Staff #1-2. This possess a potential health and safety risk to residents in care. This posses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator will submit proof of staff#1-2 hours completed of training outlined in regulation to CCLD by 2/7/2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 7, 2022
87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident... This requirement is not met as evidence by: During LPA's interview conducted with administrator and police officer. Administrator did not submit and incident report to LPA regarding R1's incident that took place prior to visit. This posses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator will provide incident reports and submit to LPA. Administrator will review Title 22 and provide a written statement that she read and understood the regulation and will submit to LPA by POC due date 2/7/2022.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87405(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 7, 2022
87405 Administrator - Qualifications and Duties (a) All facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator. The licensee and the administrator may be one and the same person. The administrator shall have sufficient freedom from other responsibilities .. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on observation and record reviews the Administrator Miriam Rudes did not have a current Administrator Certificate or an Administrator wavier on file. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator will provide proof of a current certificate or waiver and read the regulation and submit a statement to LPA by POC due date 2/7/2022.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87608(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 7, 2022
87608 Postural Supports (a) Based on the individual's preadmission appraisal, and subsequent changes to that appraisal, the facility shall provide assistance.. 3) A written order from a physician indicating the need for the postural support shall be maintained in the resident’s record... This requirement is not met as evidence by: LPA observed bed rails on R#2's bed. LPA reviewed residents files and did not see an exception for R2 to have bed rails. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator will request an exception or remove the bed rails fro R#2's bedroom and read the regulation/submit a statement to LPA by POC due date 2/7/2022.
20211 state visit · 1 document
Nov 16, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglect led to hospitalization of resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ulysses Coronel initiated a complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. LPA met with Miriam Rudes, the facility administrator and the purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: On 06/16/2020 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pamela Bunker interviewed 3 staff and 3 residents. LPA Bunker requested copies of supporting documents. On 08/31/2021 LPA Coronel conducted a tour of the facility, interviewed the administrator, 2 staff, 6 out of 6 residents and 2 witnesses. LPA Coronel requested client, staff and facility records. On 09/08/2021 LPA Coronel Conducted record Reviews. On 09/23/2021 LPA interviewed staff S3. On 10/19/2021 LPA Coronel submitted a service request for the Departments Investigation Bureau to obtain client C1’s Hospital Medical Records. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: “Staff neglect led to hospitalization of resident.” On 07/20/2020 the department received information that R1 was observed having an infection, high temperature, pus in their Foley catheter and had feces on them. Unsubstantiated On 08/31/2021 3 out of 6 clients interviewed stated that they got helped by staff whenever they needed it, client R3 stated “Yes, (I get helped) immediately.” 1 out of 6 clients R4 did not provide an answer when asked 1 out of 6 clients was neutral, R5 stated they “I never really needed help.” and 1 out of 6 clients stated they did not get helped by staff whenever they needed help. Caregiver S1 stated “R1 did not have a catheter, R1 always peed in their diapers... I was not here when they called 911, R1 was no longer here when I came back." S2 stated “I was not working here yet." The administrator stated ‘Prior to the paramedics arriving, I told former caregiver S3 not to touch or move R1. The paramedics then told me that they will make a report about R1 having feces when they got here." Witness W1 stated “Due to it being the peak of COVID-19 at the time, I did not see R1 during their stay at Beit Shalom." On 09/08/2021 LPA Coronel did not observe records of C1’s Foley Catheter. On 09/23/2021 S3 stated “C1 does not have Catheter Care Records." On 11/12/2021 Special Investigator Assistant Veronica Padilla reported that Olympia Medical Center and Kaiser Hospital were not able to provide any Hospital Medical Records based on C1’s information on file. Regarding the allegation: “Staff neglect led to hospitalization of resident.”; Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Miriam Rudes.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2021 · control 11-AS-20200708111651
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the January 29, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Beit Shalom Group LLC, licensed since 2018.
Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Beit Shalom Group II · Los Angeles
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2018, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 15
- Total complaints
- 7
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2018, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 7 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Beit Shalom Group
Is Beit Shalom Group licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Beit Shalom Group licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Beit Shalom Group been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.
Is Beit Shalom Group still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 9, 2026.
What does Beit Shalom Group cost?
$5,750 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,750–$7,100. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size in Los Angeles that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,375 to $8,250 a month, and the middle figure is $7,000 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Beit Shalom Group take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Beit Shalom Group LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Beit Shalom Group LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital-West La is 0.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Beit Shalom Group keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Beit Shalom Group license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “BEIT SHALOM GROUP LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197609314. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Beit Shalom Group LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 15 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
- 7 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is January 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,750 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,700–$7,100On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,900–$7,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,100–$5,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $2,950–$4,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County