Avantgarde Senior Living Of Tarzana is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Tarzana, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197608081, licensed for 160 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 63 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 24, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Avantgarde Senior Living Of Tarzana

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 160 residents · Tarzana, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197608081, held since 2011 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
5645 Lindley Avenue · Tarzana, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 881-0055
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 127 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 25 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 23 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
127 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 23 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 1-6, 15-19, 102, 103, 106, 110, 112, 131, 132, 134, 136, 140, 142, 144. ROOMS 247 - 253 ARE AMBULATORY ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVERS FOR 25.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 72 times and filed 63 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 24, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 24, 2026
Occupancy at the November 1, 2022 visit
112 of 138 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 24, 2021 to November 1, 2022. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (24). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 26 of 63 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 5 documents
Apr 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20256 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20249 state visits · 10 documents
Dec 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20235 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints4typical 2
Total complaints49typical 7
State visits on file72typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2011.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202655020256602024910020231313020221822120219100
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2022 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 881-0055

Is Avantgarde Senior Living Of Tarzana licensed?

Yes — Avantgarde Senior Living Of Tarzana is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Tarzana (Los Angeles County): California license #197608081, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 160 residents. State records list 63 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 24, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Avantgarde Senior Living Of Tarzana care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Avantgarde Senior Living Of Tarzana with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record127 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 23 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 1-6, 15-19, 102, 103, 106, 110, 112, 131, 132, 134, 136, 140, 142, 144. ROOMS 247 - 253 ARE AMBULATORY ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVERS FOR 25.

How much does Avantgarde Senior Living Of Tarzana cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Avantgarde Senior Living Of Tarzana's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Avantgarde Senior Living Of Tarzana accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Avantgarde Senior Living Of Tarzana through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

112 of 138 beds occupied (81%) when the state visited on November 1, 2022. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Avantgarde Senior Living Of Tarzana?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 72 state visits and 63 dated documents since 2021 for Avantgarde Senior Living Of Tarzana; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 1, 2022, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not treat resident with respect Staff do not follow through with residents medical appointments
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the assistant administrator, Abigail Gigante, and staff Joyce Martinez and Alberta Cedano, and advised them of the allegations. During the course of the investigation, interviews with staff and residents were made. Records were also reviewed and copies obtained. Between 9:30am to 12:00pm, interviews were made with staff and residents. From 12:00pm to approximately 1:00pm, Resident 1 (R1) records were reviewed. Staff do not treat residents with respect: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that some residents are being treated differently than others. LPA conducted interviews with ten of ten residents. There were no complaints or concerns from these residents about being treated different, or better than the other. According to the assistant administrator and staff, they haven't received any complaints either regarding residents being treatCDSS inspection report, November 1, 2022 · control 31-AS-20221024115542
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not answer the authorized representatives questions regarding the resident Staff are not providing the authorized representative with updated requested medication lists Staff do not ensure the Dr. orders for new medications have been received
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) MIchael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the assistant administrator, Abigail Gigante and advised her of the visit. At approximately 9:45am to 11:30am, interviews with Abigail, front desk staff and two med techs were made. An attempt was also made to interview Resident 1 (R1), but due to their diagnosis, R1 is not responsive to the LPA's questions. From 11:30am to 1:00pm, LPA conducted a review of R1's files and obtained some copies for record. From 1:00pm to 2:00pm, a physical plant inspection of the common areas was made. Staff do not answer the authorized representative questions regarding the resident: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that when R1's family would call the facility to ask what the resident's current condition is, staff will tell them that, that is not their job to report this and won't give the family information on R1. Interviews with the administrator, frCDSS inspection report, October 13, 2022 · control 31-AS-20221010101800
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is threatening to drug resident Facility did not safeguard resident's personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the administrator, Carol Garcia-Trejo, and advised her of the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted an inspection of the physical plant to insure the health and safety of the clients, interviews and record review. Staff is threatening to drug resident: In regards to this complaint, it's being alleged that Resident 1 (R1) is being abused by a staff named "Roberta", who is threatening to use needles to "drug up" R1. Interviews with administrator and staff deny the allegation. Interviews with ten of ten residents also deny that they've been threatened by staff of getting drugged. According to administrator, there is no staff by the name of Roberta employed at this facility. A review of the staff schedule and Licensing Information System (LIS) profile confirms that there is no staff UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 22, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220916121535
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is in financial distress
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to finish investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with administrator and explained the reason for this visit. It is alleged that several employees were not being paid during the period of December 2020 through January 2021. LPA conducted initial visit on 1/27/21 and interviewed Erin Mahoney who was the administrator at that time. During today's visit LPA interviewed the current administrator and facility staff who were working during December 2020 from 10-1pm. LPA also obtained and reviewed documents regarding payroll from the period of December 2020-January 2021 from 1-1:45pm. Interviews with facility staff indicated that staff had were paid and there were no issues with staff being paid. Documents obtained show that employees were paid during December 2020 through Janurary 2021. Based on the information obtained through interviews and documentation this allegation is deemed UnsubstantiateCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210126132048
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's confidential information.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with the administrator, Carol Trejo and staff, Joyce Martinez, and advised them of the allegation. It was reported that a friend of facility administrator obtained access to Resident 1 (R1's) confidential information due to facility's failure to safeguard R1's information. During the course of the investigation, interviews and record reveiw were made. According to the administrator and staff, they had no idea that the administrator's friend is in contact with R1. They stated the administrator's friend and R1 only met once, when R1 went out to get a haircut. Both administrator and staff does not know that R1 had multiple interactions with the administrator's friend since they've met. They only know R1 to be low key. In addition, R1 doesn't interact with the other residents in care. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 24, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220819162959
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not wearing masks in the facility.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
An unannounced initial 10 day complaint visit was conducted on this day by licensing program analysts (LPA’s) Evelin Rios and Yelena Avetisyan. Approximately 9:30 am upon LPA Rios’s arrival and entrance to the facility the LPA was not properly screened for COVID-19 precautions. LPA Rios were asked to conduct temperature check and Covid-19 screening for herself. LPA Avetisyan arrived to the facility at approximately 10:15 am was asked to conducted temperature check and Covid-19 screening for herself. Upon arrival to the facility LPA Rios met with staff Maria Juarez, who contacted the administrator Carolina Garcia Trejo. Ms. Juarez informed the LPA that administrator would not be able to come to the facility at this time. In regards to the allegation it was reported that the staff are not wearing masks while working or are wearing masks inappropriately. Approximately 9:30 am upon entering the facility LPA Rios observed Staff 1 (S1) at reception wearing a mask inappropriately under theirCDSS inspection report, July 27, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220721125636
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are making inappropriate comments towards residents Facility is not providing adequate food service for residents Staff denies residents food
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent visit to the facility to close out the investigation regarding the above facility. During the course of the investigation, interviews and physical plant inspection were made. LPA met with the administrator, Carolina Garcia-Trejo, and advised her of the visit. Staff are making inappropriate comments towards residents: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that a staff had been telling residents that are enrolled in the Assisted Living Waiver (ALW) Program that they shouldn’t be admitted into the facility. At the time of the initial investigation, the facility is retaining approximately 69 residents that are on the ALW program. Random residents on this program were interviewed, and denied this comment was ever made to them. Staff were also interviewed, and they weren’t aware that this comment was made to them, as they’ve never received any complaints or concern from the residents. Based on the information obtaineCDSS inspection report, May 13, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220209110608
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide medical attention for resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. It's being reported that Resident 1 (R1) complained of shortness of breath, but was refused immediate medical attention. LPA Cava met with the administrator, Carolina Garcia-Trejo, and advised her of the allegation. During the course of the investigation, a physical plant inspection, interviews and record review was made. Per interviews with the administrator and staff, R1 had only lived in the facility for two weeks. Since admission, R1 has been aggressive towards staff and had made some false allegations. Regarding the allegation of not being provided immediate medical attention, administrator and staff denies them. Staff stated in the early morning of 4/21/22, on or around 4am, R1 never informed the NOC shift he was experiencing pain. R1 carries a personal cell phone and called 911 on his own to get transported to the hospital. R1 was admitted for treatment,CDSS inspection report, April 26, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220422121241
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to protect resident from being harmed by another resident. Staff failed to destroy the non-active medications in the facility. Residents receiving hospice care without a cause. Administrator is not available at the facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to conclude the investigation regarding the allegations above. LPA met with the administrator, Carolina Garcia-Trejo and advised her of the investigation which consisted of interviews with residents, staff and record review. Staff failed to protect resident from being harmed by another resident: In regards to the allegation, it's being reported that Resident 1 (R1) is physically abusive towards staff and other residents, but staff are not doing anything to protect the other residents. It's also alleged that R1 had bitten another resident. Interviews with staff and residents do not corroborate with the allegation. Furthermore, when an interview was held with the reporting party (RP), they could not provide any witnesses vicitms, date and time of when R1 was aggressive towards other residents. Furthermore, RP could not confirm R1 biting another resident as they did not physically witness the incidentCDSS inspection report, April 15, 2022 · control 31-AS-20200914160454
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was sexually abused while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced complaint visit to finish investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with facility staff and explained the reason for this visit. This complaint was referred to accepted by the Investigations Branch (IB). IB Investigator Harmin Sandhu conducted the investigation. It is alleged that resident #1 (R1) was sexually abused by staff #1 (S1). This investigation consisted of interviews with R1 and facility staff on 12/20/21. R1's physician report was obtained and reviewed. Information obtained from interviews reveal that on 10/28/21 at approximately 11am facility staff went to R1's room, knocked on the door then opened the door and observed S1 partially undressed from the waist down with R1. Facility staff promptly left the room and alerted the administrator. S1 was promptly escorted from the facility. Interviews were conducted with R1 and other facility staff. Information from interviews reveal that S1 and R1 were inCDSS inspection report, March 25, 2022 · control 31-AS-20211101161122
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has insects
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan and Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to facility to investigate the above allegation. LPAs met with the administrator, Carol Trejo, and explained to her the purpose of the day's visit. It's being alleged that the facility has fleas and it was observed in the resident's room, bed and carpeting. Today's investigation consisted of resident and staff interviews, a physical plant inspection of resident rooms and common areas, and record review. According to staff, on or around 3/11/22, R1 was noticed to be scratching self. When staff assessed R1, they did observe fleas and eggs on her. Home Health was notified, prescription and treatment was applied. Staff stated additional flea medication was prescribed and will be applied to R1 every seven days. Staff stated R1's roommate, Resident 2 (R2) was also assessed and was observed with flea eggs. R2 was also given treatment and prescription. In addition to getting both residents treated for fleas,CDSS inspection report, March 17, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220310161117
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility not keeping residents room free from pests. Staff isolates residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan and Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to facility to investigate the above allegation. LPAs met with the administrator, Carol Trejo, and explained to her the purpose of the day's visit. Today's investigation consisted of resident and staff interviews, a physical plant inspection of resident rooms and common areas, and record review. Facility not keeping residents room free from pests: In regards to the allegation, it's alleged that facility has cockroaches and lice. This investigation is made in conjunction to complaint control # 31-AS-20220310161117, allegation facility has insects. LPAs conducted interviews and record review to address the concern. According to staff, on or around 3/11/22, R1 was noticed to be scratching self. When staff assessed R1, they did observe fleas and eggs on her. Home Health was notified, prescription and treatment was applied. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 17, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220311130718
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnqualified staff assessing resident's care Unqualifeid staff signing off on resident's documents Resident's care is not being assessed for a higher level of care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to facility to investigate the above allegations. The day's investigation consisted of a physical plant inspection, record review, and interviews with residents and staff. During the course of the investigation, LPAs met and interveiwed with the administrator, Carolina Garcia-Trejo. LPA's conducted a physical plant inspection at 9:02am, requested and reviewed facility documents at 9:35am, and conducted interviews from 10:00am to 12:45pm. Unqualified staff assessing resident's care/Unqualified staff signing off on resident's documents: In regards to the above allegations, it's alleged that Staff 1 and 2 (S1 & S2) are assessing for resident's care, signing prescription forms that are sent to the pharmacy, and placing residents on hospice care, even if the residents do not qualifiy. S1, admits she is not a nurse. Her job title is care coordinator. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 3, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220209110608
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff pushed resident while in care Staff stole resident's personal property
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Michael Cava conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with Executive Director Carol Trejo and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted physical plant tour at 9:02 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:35 AM and conducted interview with additional staff and residents between 10:00 AM to 12:45 PM. Regarding the allegation that a Staff pushed resident while in care, it was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) pushed Resident #1 (R1). LPA's record review today at 9:40 AM of Police interview with R1 revealed that the alleged incident occurred on 02/04/2022 at 8:00 PM, further review revealed that S1 was not on duty at the reported time of alleged incident. LPA's interview with R1 on 02/15/22 at 11:45 AM revealed that R1 did not remember the date and time of the alleged incident. LPA's interview with Resident #2 (R2) who is thCDSS inspection report, March 3, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220207120245
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is out of ratio with hospice resident's Unqualified Director operating facility Resident's are being overmedicated
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to facility to investigate the above allegations. The day's investigation consisted of a physical plant inspection, record review, and held interviews with residents and staff. During the course of the investigation, LPAs met and interveiwed with the operations manager, David Aguiniga. LPA's conducted a physical plant inspection from 9:35am to 10:30am, requested and reviewed facility documents at 10:30am, and conducted interviews from 10:45am to 1:00pm. Facility is out of ratio with hospice residents: In regards to the above allegation, a review of the facility license indicate that facility has a hospice waiver approved for 25. Mr. Aguiniga and staff conducted a count to confirm how many facility residents are receiving hospice care. Their count reveals 22 residents receiving hospice care. LPAs Tan and Cava UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 15, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220209110608
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not issue refund to resident's POA
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith made an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the allegation above. LPA met with the administrator and explained the reason for this visit. Regarding the allegation it is alleged that resident #1 (R1) moved out and the facility did not refund R1's pre-admission fee. LPA interviewed the administrator regarding this allegation from 1:30-1:45pm. LPA also reviewed R1's admission agreement from 1:45-2:10pm. LPA also interviewed R1's responsible person regarding this allegation. Information from a review of R1's admission agreement found that if the resident has lived in the facility for four or more months, the licensee may, but is not required to make a refund of the preadmission fee. It was noted that R1 lived in the facility from 7/5/21 through 1/13/22 which is more that four months. Based on the information obtained this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit Interview conducted. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 1, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220131121000

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left residents in soiled diapers for an extended period of time Staff did not administer residents medication in a timely manner Facility is understaffed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to finish investigation into the allegations above. LPA met with the administrator and explained the reason for this visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure no immediate health and safety concerns from 11:10-11:30am. Staff left residents in soiled diapers for an extended period of time it is alleged that residents are not being changed in a timely manner. LPA conducted an intial visit on 11/5/21 where LPA conducted interviews with residents regarding this allegation. During today's visit LPA interviewed residents who require assistance with incontinent care from 12pm-2pm. Interviews revealed that residents are satisfied with the time it is taking to get changed when they need assistance. Based on the information obtained through interviews this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 19, 2021 · control 31-AS-20211103144234
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedSmoke alarms are not working. Staff working with hospice residents are not qualified.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
An unannounced subsequent complaint visit was conducted on this day by licensing program analyst (LPA) Yelena Avetisyan. Regarding the allegation of Smoke alarms were not working it was reported that there was a small fire in the room of a resident in the memory care caused by a lamp, the smoke alarms did not go off when the fire was occurring. On 10/18/2021 LPA conducted a tour of the room indicated on the complaint and spoke with the current administrator. While touring the room LPA did not observe any smoke damage. According to Ms. Trejo the family of the resident brought a new lamp and did not completely remove the plastic. When the lamp was turned on it melted the plastic causing very little smoke. Per administrator the incident did not cause a fire and did not cause heavy smoke to be in the rooms and believes that is the reason the smoke alarms were not activated. On 10/20/2021 at 8:30 am LPA conducted telephone interview with LAFD Inspector regarding the allegation. According toCDSS inspection report, October 20, 2021 · control 31-AS-20211013141439
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not issue Resident's Representative a refund. Facility did not provide Resident's Representative written notice of policies regarding contract termination upon death in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s) Wendell Smith and LaQueena Lacy conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to investigate the allegations above. LPA met with the administrator and explained the reason for this visit. Upon entry to the facility a physical plant tour was conducted from 9:45am-10:00 am to ensure no immediate health and safety issues. No immediate health and safety issues were noted during the walk through. Facility did not issue Resident's Representative a refund Regarding this allegation it is alleged that resident # 1(R1) rent was paid in advance for October 2021 and that R1 passed away on 9/24/21 and the facility has not issued a refund for the October 2021 payment. LPA's conducted interviews with the administrator and facility staff regarding this allegation from 10-10:20am. LPA's reviewed R1's facility file and obtained copies of pertinent information related to R1's file from 10:20-11:00am. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 5, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210929150409
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not administering medications to residents according to physicians instructions. Staff are not allowing resident to purchase a new bed. Staff are not allowing resident to go outdoors.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s) Wendell Smith and LaQueena Lacy conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegations above. LPA met with the administrator and explained the reason for this visit. Staff are not administering medications to residents according to physicians instructions. It is alleged that the facility changed resident # 1(R1) medication without permission and R1 was not receiving their medication as prescribed. From 12:15-1:00PM LPA's reviewed R1's medication record from January to March 2021. LPA obtained copies of pertinent information related to the allegation. LPA's interviewed facility staff from 1:00-1:15pm. LPA's were not able to interview R1 due to R1 passing on 9/24/21. Interviews revealed that R1's family picked R1's pharmacy and that R1 had their own physician Based on information obtained through interviews and record review this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 5, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210120115809
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure the residents are properly fed while in care Residents personal belongings are mishandled while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Calvin Tsui and Alex Pritz conducted a unannounced complaint visit to invesitgate the allegations of "Staff do not ensure the residents are properly fed while in care" and "Residents personal belongings are mishandled while in care". For the allegation. "Staff do not ensure the residents are properly fed while in care" the allegation indicates the food is in poor quality and the portions are too small, the meals are served at inconsistant times resulting in residents going hungry. At 11:30 a.m. LPA's interviewed 10% of facility census; 5/5 residents interviewed in memory care and 8/8 interviewed in assisted living stated that they where getting enought to eat. Furthermore, LPA observed residents asking for seconds during lunch and getting more. The allegation is unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 28, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210915103232
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to check on residents in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to further investigate the allegation above. LPA met with the administrator and explained the reason for this visit. Regarding the allegation above it is alleged that staff failed to check on residents in a timely manner when they pushed their pendant in their room. LPA had previously conducted visits regarding this allegation on 6/18/21 and 1/29/21. During today's visit LPA conducted interviews with random residents regarding the allegation from 11:30-12:30pm. Based on the information obtained during interviews this allegation is still deemed Unsubstantiated. Exit Interview conducted. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 27, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210127105116
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are not able to communicate with staff. Facility phone doesn’t get answered because of not enough staff. Resident not being provided adequate service.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith made an unannounced subsequent visit to finish investigation into the allegations above. LPA met with facility staff and explained the reason for this visit. LPA conducted an initial visit to this facility on 8/17/21. Residents are not able to communicate with staff It is alleged that residents are not able to communicate with staff due to staff not speaking english. LPA conducted interviews from approximately 10am-11:30am with various residents regarding this allegation. Information from interviews reveal that residents are able to communicate sufficiently with facility staff. LPA also spoke with various staff throughout the visit and was able to communicate with staff in English. Based on the information obtained through interviews and observation this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 24, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210816082350
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to report Covid Cases
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and explained the reason for this visit. Regarding the allegation above it is alleged that facility failed to report they had active covid cases. At approximately 12:30 pm LPA conducted an interview with the administrator regarding this allegation. Administrator stated that they did covid testing on 7/27/21 and on 7/30/21 late in the afternoon the results came back that one resident and one staff were positive. They then called Department of Public Health and notified them of the situation. Facility then conducted mandatory covid testing for all residents and staff from 4pm-8pm on 7/30/21. They received the results today and all were negative including the two that were initially positive. LPA received an incident report regarding the covid cases this morning at 9:28 am. Based on the information obtained through interviews and documentation received this allegation isCDSS inspection report, August 2, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210730150302
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not give resident a sufficient amount of water Staff handled resident in a rough manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to this facility to further investigate the above stated allegations. LPA met with Assistant Care Coordinator Jero Argota and explained the reason for the visit. LPA also talked to the new Executive Director Carolina Garcia Trejo on the phone and designated Mr. Argota to sign the report. At around 9:00 AM, LPA conducted physical plant tour. At 10:00 AM, LPA requested copy of pertinent facility documents relevant to the investigation. At 11:02 AM to 2:30 PM, LPA conducted interview with staff and residents. Regarding the allegation that Staff did not give resident a sufficient amount of water, LPA interview with five (5) Memory Care Unit staff today between 11:02 to 2:30 PM revealed that staff conduct routine check to ensure that all residents are comfortable and their needs are met. LPA interview with staff present during the incident on 05/22/2020 where Resident #1 (R1) was screaming for water, revealedCDSS inspection report, July 24, 2021 · control 31-AS-20200601091800

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 72 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
49
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
72
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 881-0055
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Avantgarde Senior Living Of Tarzana? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.