Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Autumn Hills Residential HomeLicense #197606938 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareAutumn Hills Residential HomeLicense #197606938 · 43129 Lemonwood Drive, Lancaster, CA · (661) 943-8194Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/Lancaster/Autumn Hills Residential Home
Map · 43129 Lemonwood Drive

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,300/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (661) 943-8194

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

AH

Call Autumn Hills Residential Home

Lancaster · Licensed for 6

(661) 943-8194

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Lancaster

Autumn Hills Residential Home

43129 Lemonwood Drive, Lancaster, CA 93536 · Licensed since 2007

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Autumn Hills Residential Home

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,300 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 5 residents
  • Hospiceup to 1 resident
  • Bedridden

Not on file: dementia approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
5 NON-AMBULATORY. 1 BEDRIDDEN BDRM 3. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 1.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 1 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Autumn Hills Residential Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,300a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,300

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,300likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,300likely $3,500–$5,300

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 7 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,500
$4,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,150–$8,700
$6,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $5,000

$3,500$5,300

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

8 homes like this within 7 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$4,500.

  • Antelope Valley ManorLancaster · 1.4 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Alexo ManorLancaster · 2.2 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Beyond A HomeLancaster · 3.0 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Caring Home CottageLancaster · 3.3 mi · Small home
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Club Rancho ManorPalmdale · 3.3 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Pink Coral Residence IIPalmdale · 3.8 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • 1st Golden Senior Care HomePalmdale · 5.1 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sarah's Care HomeLancaster · 6.9 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 7 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

43129 Lemonwood Drive, Lancaster, CA 93536Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Antelope Valley Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.2 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197606938 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 6 of 8 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.

20262 state visits · 2 documents

Jul 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent exit doors form being blocked Staff do not keep the facility maintained

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint visit at this facility for the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted access by a staff member. The administrator, Augustine Kehinde met LPA and LPM shortly after. LPA explained the reason for the visit. An entrance interview was conducted. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA initiated a physical plant tour of the facility to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. While conducting the tour, from 9:10 a.m., to 10:40 a.m., LPA interviewed four (4) out of four (4) residents and two (2) staff. At approximately, 11:45 a.m., LPA and LPM interviewed the administrator. LPA obtained and reviewed copies of the facility's resident roster, personnel report (LIC 500), residents' admission agreements, residents', physician's reports, and Resident Personal Property and Valuables document. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff did not prevent exit doors from being blocked. It is alleged that an exit door is blocked with objects. (Continue to LIC9099-C) Substantiated Interviews with residents revealed exit doors have not been blocked preventing residents from using the doors. Interviews with staff revealed staff do not block the exit doors at the facility to prevent residents from exiting. They have a sound device monitoring system that notifies them when an exit door is open. During the facility’s tour, LPA observed room #2(BR#2), which is a share room with two hospital beds, a curtain in the middle to provide privacy, a stack of storage space to the right of the bed closest to the exit. An exit door to the left of the bed and a tray table blocking the passageway to the exit door. There is about 3 feet of space between the beds and about 2 1/2 feet in between the bed closest to the exit doors and the wall passageway. And about 2 feet between the end of the beds and the wall where the closet is located. Even though the tray table can be moved it causes a hazard in case of an emergency by blocking the exit door. Therefore, this allegation is substantiated. Based on LPA's observations, interviews which were conducted, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation Staff do not keep the facility maintained. It is alleged there are hazards in the facility’s backyard due to lack of maintenance. Interviews with residents revealed the facility is in working condition. Interviews with staff revealed the administrator is in charge of any repairs at the home and does a review of the home at least twice a week. During the tour of the facility LPA observed, carpet ripped with a gap of about an inch from wall to wall in room #4(BR#4)’s doorway. Room #1(BR#1) had a dent in the wall where the bed is against it, and it is eye level to the resident in care, a screw was observed in the corner of the room. Bathroom #1(BT#1) has a crack with an opening in the wall under the towel rack the size an orange. The backyard has a cover pergola over the exit door from the family room into the backyard that was observed cracking probably from water damage, the ground floor has a crack the size of a grapefruit on the right side of the patio area, screen door was observed leaning against the wall over a bicycle, a landscape border was observed bended and down against the dirt in the garden area, a broken rake was observed laying in the grass area. Based on LPAs observations, interviews which were conducted, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, LIC9099D, and appeal rights was provided to administrator. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: Staff yell at residents. It is alleged that staff scream and curse at the residents. LPA’s interviews with two (2) staff members stated they have not yelled at residents nor witnessed any staff yelling or curse at residents. One (1) staff member stated that they have a loud voice but are not yelling at residents. Interview with the administrator denied the allegation, stating staff have training regarding personal rights and know not to do that. LPA’s interviews with four (4) out of (4) residents denied the allegation, stating staff have not yelled or cursed at them and they have not witness staff yelling at other residents. One (1) resident stated that they do not like the attitude of one (1) staff member but did not wish to elaborate. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the Allegation: Staff are not meeting residents laundry needs. It is alleged that bed sheets and laundry haven’t been done for weeks. LPA’s interviews with two (2) staff members stated they schedule laundry service twice a week and as needed. One (1) staff member stated that they will wash bedding and resident’s clothes right away if someone has had an accident and that there is a resident that may refuse their bed sheets changed. LPA’s interviews with four (4) out of (4) residents reported that staff take care of laundry service and have no concerns regarding laundry. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation: Staff are not meeting residents bedding needs. It is alleged, that residents have stains on their sheets that have been there for three weeks. LPA’s interviews with two (2) staff members stated they change bedding once a week or as needed. One (1) staff member stated that one (1) resident may refuse their bedding changed and another resident requires frequent bedding changes. LPA’s interviews with four (4) out of (4) residents reported that staff change their bedding. One (1) resident stated that they prefer to make their own bed and that their bed sheets were changed two days ago. Another resident reported their bed sheets were changed yesterday. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. (Continue to LIC9099-C) Page 2 of 4 Regarding the Allegation: Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents. It is alleged, that residents are only served hotdogs, rice and noodles. LPA’s interviews with two (2) staff members stated they follow a menu and residents have not complained about meals. One (1) staff member stated that they do serve hotdogs but will serve various balanced meals as well. LPA’s interviews with four (4) out of (4) residents denied the allegation, stating staff provide different meals consisting of protein, grains and vegetables. Interview with one (1) resident stated they request soft or liquified food and staff will follow their instructions. LPA’s review of residents’ Physician’s Reports did not indicate any residents have a prescribed special diet. LPA observed various food in the refrigerator and pantry. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the Allegation: Staff did not prevent a resident from entering another resident's room. It is alleged, that a resident goes into other residents rooms. LPA’s interviews with one (1) of (2) staff members stated there are two residents that enter another residents room. One of those residents was a previous roommate and will go into the room with permission. The other resident had entered the room after the resident residing in the room had offered them snacks and may enter again but is redirected. Interview with the administrator revealed, one (1) resident when they were first admitted to the facility was wandering at night and had entered another residents room but may have been sleepwalking or had entered the room by mistake. The resident was re-evaluated and with new physician orders has improved wandering behavior. LPA’s interviews with four (4) out of (4) residents reported no issues with residents entering their rooms. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. (Continue to LIC9099-C) Page 3 of 4 Regarding allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings. It is alleged a watch was stolen from a resident. Interviews conducted with residents revealed that none of their personal belongings have gone missing. Interviews conducted with staff revealed one resident had claimed to have lost their wallet. However, staff looked for the wallet and was found and no other residents reported anything missing. LPA reviewed Resident Personal and Property Values sheets for four (4) residents, each list their personal belongings such as clothing, glasses, and other items. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Staff do not provide activities for the residents. It is alleged there are no activities available for the residents and residents only watch TV. Interviews with residents revealed residents prefer to watch TV. Two (2) residents stated that there are volunteers who come to either play chess or provide entertainment. Residents also stated that they like taking walks. Interviews with staff revealed residents would rather watch TV than engage in activities. During facility’s tour LPA observed a set of domino and a board game that was stored in the closet and some magazines in the living room. Facility maintains a daily activity sheet that includes activities of daily living(ADLs), brisk walk, leg pedaling, tea time, free activities, drawing, games, reading, and karaoke. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Staff are inappropriately punishing residents. It is alleged a resident is being asked to stay in their room as a result for using the bathroom consistently. Interviews with residents revealed staff treat them with respect and have not been threatened or punished by the staff. Interviews with staff revealed that staff treat the residents with respect, they are aware not to threaten or punish the residents. Personal Rights training was provided on 4/21/2026 to the staff. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided to administrator. Page 4 of 4the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260702115847

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87307(a)(2)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 8, 2026

Personal Accommodations and Services (a)... provide comfortable living accommodations... The following provisions shall apply: (2) Resident bedrooms shall... : (A)... allow for easy passage... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations the licensee did not ensure a exit door was not blocked by a tray table and furniture did not allow for easy passage around bedroom #2 which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2026

Plan of correction: The administrator will certify in writing a plan of how the room will be re arranged with the required furniture to ensure passageways and exit doors are not blocked and send the statement to the department by POC due date 07/08/2026.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 17, 2026

Maintenance and Operation: (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations the licensee did not ensure facility was free of wall holes/cracks, floor cracks and carpet damage and maintain the black yard organized which poses an potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2026

Plan of correction: The administrator will repair issues to facility and send a picture of the repairs to the department by POC due date 07/17/2026.

May 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. This is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) approved for five non ambulatory residents and 1 bedridden resident in bedroom #3. LPA rang the door bell and was greeted and granted access by a staff member who contacted the Administrator, Augustine Kehinde. LPA met the administrator shortly after and explained the reason for the visit. A physical plant tour was conducted of the facility inside and out and the LPA observed the following: At entry LPA observed required postings on the wall near the front door and the hallway leading to resident bedrooms. By the entry there is a closet where the facility stores extra hygiene products for the residents. Bedrooms: There are four (04) resident bedrooms in total. Two (02) bedrooms are shared and two (02) bedrooms are for private use. Resident bedrooms were observed properly furnished with appropriate beds, night stands and chairs. Doors in bedrooms leading to the outside have auditory alarms that were observed functional. Bathrooms: There two (2) and one-half (1/2) bathrooms. Two (2) are designated for resident use. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. LPA took the hot water temperature from two (02) out of three (02) bathrooms and they measured between 107.6 and 111.2 degrees Fahrenheit. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA also observed a 7 day non-perishable and a 2 day perishable supply of food in the facility. The fire extinguishers are located by the entry and in the kitchen. They were observed fully charged with service date 04/13/26. Common Areas: These included two (02) living rooms, and the dining area. The common areas were properly furnished. The dining room has a table with chairs to sit the capacity of the facility. The living rooms have televisions and couches. The facility has a telephone accessible to residents. Surrounding Grounds: The backyard is fenced in. LPA observed that the entry/exits were free of obstruction. There is a shaded area for residents to use. The backyard is sufficient in space for outdoor exercise and activities. No bodies of water observed. Laundry/Garage: The laundry area is located in the attached garage. The door leading to the garage was observed locked. Cleaning supplies and detergents are kept locked in the garage. From 12:52 p.m. to 1:30 p.m., LPA reviewed four (4) of four (4) resident records and (4) staff records. Records were complete and in compliance with licensing forms. Medications are centrally stored and were observed locked in a cabinet by the workstation. Medications and medication records were reviewed for proper documentation. Centrally Stored Medication Records are manually completed by staff and facility keeps a Medication Administration Record (MAR). LPA reviewed the facility's, Certificate of Liability Insurance, Personnel Report (LIC500), Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610E), and last Fire Drill training conducted on 04/01/2026. LPA requested that a copy of LIC610E and liability insurance be emailed to update the Regional Office facility file. The posted facility sketch and bedroom designations are inconsistent with Fire Safety Inspection (STD 850) dated 03/09/2007 however, Regional Office facility file has an STD 850 dated 03/05/2008 missing a facility sketch. LPA requested the administrator submit the facility sketch they are currently using and will follow up with the Fire Prevention Division regarding bedroom designations. Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide. All resident rooms are equipped with smoke detectors and the facility's smoke detectors are hard wired and interconnected. The facility has two (2) carbon monoxide detector is located in the hallway leading to the bedrooms and another one in the living room. Detectors were tested by administrator at 2:00 p.m., and were observed operational. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during todays visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2026

20252 state visits · 2 documents

Nov 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not provide resident with assistance. Staff do not treat resident(s) with dignity and respect.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an unannounced complaint visit at this facility for the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted access by Staff#1 (S1). The administrator, Augustine Kehinde could not meet LPA. LPA met with the administrator designee, Adebisi Ogunsaju shortly after. LPA explained the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations LPA initiated a physical plant tour of the facility to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. LPA did not observe any health or safety concerns. While conducting the tour, from 9:33 a.m., to 10:30 a.m., LPA interviewed four (4) out of four (4) residents and two (2) staff. At approximately 10:30 a.m., LPA obtained and reviewed copies of the facility's roster, personnel report (LIC500), resdients' admission agreements, resdients' physician's reports, and residents' appraisals. (Continue to LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated (Continued from LIC9099) Allegation: Staff does not provide resident with assistance. In regards to the allegation, it was reported that staff are not assisting Resident #1 (R1) with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) such as bathing, cleaning or ambulating. LPA's interview with one (1) out of the four (4) residents stated that staff initially helped them with bathing and transferring out of bed. However, the resident later refused further assistance due to Staff #1’s (S1) rude behavior and lack of effort. The resident reported that S1 made dismissive remarks, such as stating they "don’t have time to assist". Interview with three (3) out of four (4) residents reported they receive varying degrees of assistance with ADLs from staff based on their own ability and denied having issues receiving such assistance when they need it or ask for it. Although one (1) of these residents denied the allegation they stated S1 had been rude when they had asked for an item. Four (4) out of four (4) residents deny witnessing staff refuse to provide assistance to other residents. LPA's interview with staff denied the allegation, reporting that assistance is offered regularly, but some residents decline help, telling staff, they are capable of doing things independently. LPA's review of R1's physician's report revealed R1's physician checked that R1 has the capacity for self-care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not enough evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time Allegation: Staff do not treat resident(s) with dignity and respect. In regards to the allegation it was reported, that Resident #1 (R1) was told to go back to their room because they were being too noisy. During interviews with staff, staff denied the allegation. According to Staff #1 (S1), they have a routine cleaning schedule and had asked R1 to return to their room only until they had finished cleaning. Interview with staff deny telling any resident they are being too noisy. LPA's interview with two (02) out of four (04) residents reported they feel staff do not treat them with dignity and respect. All other residents stated they feel staff treat them with respect and dignity. LPAs interview with four (4) out of four (4) residents deny witnessing staff being disrespectful to other residents. Based on interviews, and conflicting information there is not enough evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025 · control 31-AS-20251118152752
May 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 05/29/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. The inspection tool was used for todays visit. LPA met with Staff#1 (S1) who granted access and contacted the Administrator, Augustine Kehinde. LPA met the administrator shortly after and explained the reason for the visit. Physical tour was conducted and LPA observed the following: At entry LPA observed appropriate postings on the wall near the front door and the hallway leading to residents bedrooms and bathroom. Kitchen: At 11:32 AM, LPA observed S1 washing dishes. The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA also observed enough 7 day non-perishable amount of food and a 2 day perishable supply of food in the facility. Staff #2 (S2) arrived to the facility at 11:39 a.m., with more groceries. Bedrooms: There are four (04) resident bedrooms in total. Two (02) bedrooms are shared and two (02) bedrooms are for private use. Resident bedrooms were observed clean and clear of clutter, properly furnished with appropriate beds, night stands and chairs. Doors in bedrooms leading to the outside had auditory alarms that were observed functional. In the hallway closet leading to bedrooms labeled 2 and 3 LPA observed extra bed and bath linens. Bathrooms: There are three (03) bathrooms designated for residents' use. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. From 12:27 p.m. to 12:30 p.m. LPA took the hot water temperature from two (02) out of three (03) bathroom and they measured between 110.1 and 119.1 degrees Fahrenheit, within regulation. (Continue on LIC809-C) Common Areas: These included two (02) living rooms, and the dining area. The common areas were properly furnished. The dining room has a table with chairs to sit the capacity of the facility. The living rooms have televisions and couches that were observed in good repair. Outside/Surrounding Grounds: LPA observed that the entry/exits were free of obstruction. There is a shaded area for residents to use and furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The backyard is sufficient in space for outdoor exercise and activities. No bodies of water observed. Laundry/Garage: The laundry area is located in the attached garage. there is access to the garage inside the facility. The door leading to the garage was observed locked. Cleaning supplies and detergents are kept locked in the garage. The garage is used for facility storage. STAFF WORKSTATION: Facility has a work station for staff. The work station is located by the dining area. Facility files and resident records are stored in a locked cabinet in the workstation. Medications are stored in a locked cabinet in the work station. A first aid kit is kept in the locked cabinet with the medications. Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide. All resident rooms are equipped with smoke detectors and the facility's smoke detectors are hard wired and interconnected. There is a pull station located at the front entrance. The carbon monoxide detector is located in the hallway. Detectors were tested by administrator at 1:17 p.m., and were observed operational. The fire extinguishers are located by the entry and in the kitchen. They were observed fully charged with service date 04/21/25. From 1:20 p.m. to 2:30 p.m., LPA reviewed six (06) of six (06) resident records and (3) staff records. Records were observed locked in a workstation cabinet, complete and up-to-date. At 2:31 p.m., LPA reviewed residents' centrally stored medication and medication records. LPA observed medications are centrally stored and locked in the work station cabinet. LPA collected a copy of the Certificate of Liability Insurance, and LIC500. LPA reviewed administrator certificate, LIC610E, and last Fire Drill training conducted on 02/22/2025. No deficiency cited during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2025

20242 state visits · 2 documents

Oct 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff blocked exit to resident's room.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an unannounced complaint visit at this facility for the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted accesses by staff#1 (S1). S2 contacted the administrator via telephone and LPA explained the reason for the visit. The administrator, Augustine Kehinde informed LPA they would meet LPA at the facility. Allegation: Staff blocked exit to resident's room. In regards to the allegation, it was reported a wooden board was being used to block the only exit to resident #1's (R1's) bedroom. To investigate the allegation LPA toured the facility to ensure the health and safety of resident's. LPA did not observe a wooden plank or board anywhere in the facility. From approximately 12:23 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. LPA interviewed four (4) residents, the administrator, S1 and S2. LPA did not obtain information about the allegation from R1's interview. At approximately 1:25 p.m. LPA obtained copies of R1's physician report, unusual incident report and mental health appointments. (Continued to LIC9099-C) Substantiated (Continued from LIC9099) At 2:23 p.m. LPA interview two (2) more residents. LPA's review of R1's physician report revealed the physician did not select yes or no for "able to leave the facility unassisted" question. According to the administrator the primary care physician was leaving the response up to R1 psychiatrist. According to the administrator the psychiatrist had verbally told them R1 cannot leave the facility unassisted. LPA's interview with administrator and S1 revealed R1 has gotten lost in the past and tends to pick up trash from the floor to eat. LPA's interview with S2 confirmed there was a piece of wood holding R1's door closed because R1 is prone to leaving the facility unassisted. LPA's interview with the Administrator confirms he found out about the wood and immediately instructed his staff to throw it away. According to the administrator R1 has had an escalation of behaviors due to R1's mental health diagnosis. Administrator states his staff informed him R1 has made threats to staff and residents prompting staff to keep R1 in their room afraid R1 may attack another resident. Interview with four (4) out of six (6) residents that responding to LPA's questioning state they feel safe with staff at the facility and are able to leave the facility when they want. Administrator states in-service training has been conducted regarding residents personal rights. Administrator provided copies of in-service sign in sheet to LPA. Based on LPA's interviews the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights provided and a copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241022152637

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 30, 2024

(a)Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(6) To leave or depart the facility at any time and to not be locked into any room, building or on facility premises by day or night. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the regulation cited as staff would obstruct R1's bedroom door preventing R1 from exiting which posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2024

Plan of correction: The administrator has thrown away the wood used to obstruct bedroom door and has had inservice training with his staff relating to personal accommodations and services. POC cleared today.

Apr 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 04/29/2024 at 9:30 a.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lorena Casillas arrived at the facility listed above to conduct an unannounced annual inspection. LPA was greeted by staff #1 (S1) and granted access. S1 called the Administrator Agustine Kehinde and the reason for the visit was explained. Administrator would not be able to attend at the moment but would be arriving at a later time. Administrator designated House Manager (HA) Adebisi Ogunsajo to assist LPA in the meantime. At 10:00 a.m. LPA and the HA toured the physical plant of the facility inside and outside, and the following was observed. Living room: There are 2 living room areas, both were clean and properly furnished. LPA observed one (1) fire extinguisher fully charged last serviced 04/26/2024. Kitchen: The kitchen was observed to be clean and clear of clutter. Appliances and fixtures were functioning properly. LPA observed cleaning products kept locked under the kitchen sink. LPA observed knives locked in a bottom cabinet. LPA observed a sufficient amount of 2- day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food at the facility all properly stored. LPA observed a second fridge in the kitchen meant for staff only. LPA observed a second fire extinguisher fully charged with a last serviced date of 04/26/2024. Dining area had an appropriate table, and chairs to sit the capacity of the facility. Bedrooms: LPA inspected five (5) out of five (5) bedrooms. Four (4) out of Five (5) bedrooms are for resident use. Two (2) bedrooms are currently shared by two (2) residents. LPA observed each resident room to be properly furnished with a bed, bedding, night-stand, chair, and with sufficient lighting and storage. LPA observed extra linens in a hallway cabinet outside the bedrooms. One (1) bedroom is used for live in staff, it was locked and inaccessible to residents. (Continued on LIC809-C) Bathrooms: The facility has 3 bathrooms. LPA took water temperature at 10:15 a.m. from one (1) out of the three (3) bathroom's sink and temperature read 105.0 degrees F. LPA observed the bathrooms to be clean and properly supplied with toilet paper, soap, paper towels. Laundry/Garage: Laundry area is located in the garage. Garage is inaccessible to clients. Detergents are kept locked in the garage. Surrounding Grounds: Entry and exits were free from obstructions. There is covered patio. LPA observed appropriate furniture for residents to use. There is a small shed that was locked and used to store extra facility supplies. Administrative: LPA collected Resident Roster, LIC500 and Liability Insurance. Annual fees are current. Resident Records: From 10:30 a.m. to 11:30. a.m. LPA reviewed resident records. Staff Records: From 11:30 a.m to 12:00 p.m. LPA reviewed staff records. Interviews: From 12:30 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. LPA conducted interviews with four (4) out of four (4) residents and three (3) out of four (4) staff present. At 1:00 p.m. LPA observed Administrator test a dual smoke and carbon monoxide detector. Detectors are hardwired and interconnected to other detectors located throughout the facility. Detectors were observed to be functioning properly. Medication: Medication Records were reviewed for proper documentation. Centrally stored medications are maintained in a locked cabinet by the kitchen and dining area. Medications were observed locked. No citations issued. Exit Interview Conducted. A copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 2 documents

20231 state visit · 1 document

Jun 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 06/04/2023 at 9:30 a.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios arrived at the facility listed above to conduct an unannounced annual inspection. LPA observed appropriate Covid-19 postings on the outside wall by the front door. LPA was greeted by staff #1 (S1) and granted access. S1 called the Administrator designee and notified Administrator designee Adebisi Ogunsaju, LPA was at the facility. Administrator Augustine Kehinde and administrator designee met LPA shortly after and LPA explained the reason for the visit. At 10:00 a.m. LPA and the administrator toured the physical plant of the facility inside and outside, and the following was observed: Living room: There are 2 living room areas and both were clean and properly furnished. LPA observed one (1) of two (2) fire extinguisher fully charged last serviced 04/10/2023. Kitchen/ Dinning area: LPA observed breakfast had just finished and S1 was clearing the table and then washing the dishes. The kitchen was observed to be clean and clear of clutter once S1 was done. Appliances and fixtures were functioning properly. LPA observed cleaning products kept locked under the kitchen sink. LPA observed knives locked in a bottom cabinet. LPA observed a sufficient amount of 2- day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. LPA observed a second fridge in the kitchen meant for staff only. LPA observed a second fire extinguisher fully charged with a last serviced date of 04/10/2023. Dining area had appropriate table and chairs to sit the capacity of the facility. Bedrooms: LPA inspected five (5) out of five (5) bedrooms. Four (4) out of Five (5) bedrooms are for resident use. One (1) bedroom is currently shared by two (2) residents. LPA observed each resident room to be properly furnished with a bed, bedding, night stand, chair, and with sufficient lighting and storage. LPA observed extra linens in a hallway cabinet outside the bedrooms. Bathrooms: The facility has 3 bathrooms. LPA took water temperature at 12:44 p.m. from one (1) out of the three (3) bathroom's sink and temperature read 117.3 degrees F. LPA observed the bathrooms to be clean and properly supplied with toilet paper, soap, paper towels. (LIC 809-C onto next page) (LIC 809-C continued) Laundry/Garage: Laundry area is located in the garage. Garage is inaccessible to clients. Detergents are kept locked in the garage. Surrounding Grounds: Entry and exits were free from obstructions. There is a small covered patio. LPA observed appropriate furniture for residents to use. There is a small shed that was locked and being used to store extra facility supplies. Interviews: From 10:25 a.m. to 11:20 a.m. LPA conducted interviews with four (4) out of four (4) residents and three (3) out of three (3) staff present, including the administrator. Resident/Staff Records: From 11:20 a.m. to 12.24 p.m. LPA reviewed facility records. Review of resident records revealed one (1) out of four (4) resident records had incomplete information on their physician's reports and did not have a medical assessment on file. According to Administrator the primary physician visits facility in person and primary physician did not complete physician's report entirely or attached a copy of the medical assessment report. Administrator states, they will call physician on Monday to obtain records. LPA review of record revealed the same resident #3 (R3) did not have a reappraisal/needs and services plan for their change in condition (current condition). At 1:00 p.m. LPA observed Administrator test a dual smoke and carbon monoxide detector. Detector is hardwired and interconnected to other detectors located through out the facility. Detectors were observed to be functioning properly. Medication: Medication Records were reviewed for proper documentation. Centrally stored medications are maintained in a locked cabinet by the kitchen and dining area. Medications were observed locked. Refills are either done automatically every 30 days, or ordered by the physician. From 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. LPA and administrator reviewed Centrally Stored Medication Records and medication for (4) four out of (4) residents in care. CSMDR are provided by the pharmacy for three (3) out of four (4) residents. Resident #1 (R1) has a different pharmacy from the other residents and CSMDR is filled in by staff at the facility. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were deficiencies observed during todays visit (refer to 809-D). Exit Interview Conducted. A Copy of appeal rights and this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2023

20221 state visit · 1 document

Apr 6, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 11:40 a.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Ruiz conducted an unannounced annual inspection at this facility. LPA was greeted by staff and later met with the Administrator’s wife, Adebisi Kehinde who was designated to sign the report. At 12:00 p.m. a physical tour was initiated with designee. This is a 5-bedroom, 2.5-bathroom facility. Infection control: Upon arrival, staff took LPA’s temperature, but was not asked to sign-in the visitor’s log. LPA reminded staff and designee to ensure all visitors are asked to sign in. Proper signage was observed inside along the hallway but was no signs were observed posted outside the facility. LPA reminded designee to ensure infection control signs are posted outside the facility. LPA observed sufficient PPE supplies for residents and staff. Food Inspection: LPA observed there to be sufficient stock of one-week non-perishable foods and two-day perishable foods. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Sharps are kept inaccessible to residents. Medications are in a centrally stored and are kept locked in a cabinet along the hall. Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide were located throughout the facility and appear to be functional. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 5/7/21. Resident rooms: There are 4 bedrooms designated for residents. All bedrooms are properly furnished, have appropriate bedding, and linens. Bathrooms: LPA observed bathrooms had trash cans with closed tight-fitting lids. Soap and paper towels were readily available. Outside areas: LPA toured the outside area of the facility. LPA did not observe a covered shaded area with seating for residents. LPA asked that photographic evidence of a covered shaded area with seating be provided no later than 4/13/22. There are no bodies of water. No deficiencies observed at this time. Exit interview conducted and report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2022

4 of 6 beds were occupied at the July 7, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Autumn Hills Residential Home, Inc., licensed since 2007.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2007, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
9
Total complaints
3
Substantiated allegations
3
Type A citations
2
Type B citations
1

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2007, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations20
Type B citations10
Substantiated allegations30
Total complaints30

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Autumn Hills Residential Home

Is Autumn Hills Residential Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Autumn Hills Residential Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Autumn Hills Residential Home been cited?

2 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2007, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Autumn Hills Residential Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Autumn Hills Residential Home cost?

$4,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,300. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 7 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Lancaster that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $4,250 a month, and the middle figure is $3,800 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Autumn Hills Residential Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Autumn Hills Residential Home, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Antelope Valley Medical Center is 2.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Autumn Hills Residential Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 1 resident, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Autumn Hills Residential Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “AUTUMN HILLS RESIDENTIAL HOME, INC.”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197606938. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Autumn Hills Residential Home, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2007, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2007, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Lancaster · 0.4 mi

    Bellamar Lancaster

    Large community · licensed for 68

    Starting rate

    $3,965 a month to start

    Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Lancaster · 0.7 mi

    A Helping Hand Home Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,550 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,600

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Lancaster · under 0.1 mi

    Mark Alton Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,750 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,900

    On the state record

    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Lancaster · 0.5 mi

    Touch of an Angel Lancaster

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,700 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,800

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Lancaster · 0.7 mi

    Blossom Love for Elderly

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,750 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,850

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Lancaster · 0.7 mi

    Strawberry Cottage

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,550 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,600

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
AH

Call Autumn Hills Residential Home

Lancaster · Licensed for 6

(661) 943-8194

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Autumn Hills Residential Home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages