Chateau Magnolia is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Burbank, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197604809, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated April 6, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Chateau Magnolia

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Burbank, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197604809, held since 2004 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1061 East Magnolia St. · Burbank, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 843-5873
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 1 resident
Bedridden careApproved for 6 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH SIX (6) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 1, 2, 3. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR ONE (1).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 16 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 6, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 6, 2026
Occupancy at the July 24, 2023 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 2, 2022 to July 24, 2023. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 4 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Apr 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Apr 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations7typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints8typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file16typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2004.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025220202411020232222022563
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $4,000–$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 843-5873

Is Chateau Magnolia licensed?

Yes — Chateau Magnolia is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Burbank (Los Angeles County): California license #197604809, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 6, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Chateau Magnolia care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Chateau Magnolia with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordSIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH SIX (6) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 1, 2, 3. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR ONE (1).

How much does Chateau Magnolia cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Chateau Magnolia's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Chateau Magnolia accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Chateau Magnolia is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on July 24, 2023. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Chateau Magnolia?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 16 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2022 for Chateau Magnolia; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 24, 2023, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit resident Staff covered resident's face Staff threatened resident with harm
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
The purpose of this report is to provide additional infomation regarding Staff S1's date of termination. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Karine Filikyan. The purpose of the visit is a subsequent complaint visit and to deliver findings from the original complaint dated 06/07/2022. The initial visit was conducted on 06/14/2022 and the following was done: Facility tour was conducted at 10:00 AM which included 6 client bedrooms, 2 client bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen, front and backyard area. Interviews were conducted at 10:15 AM to 11:00 AM with S 1 and Administrator. A subsequent visit was conducted on 10/05/2022 and included the following: Interviews were conducted at 10:50 AM to 11:05 AM with Administrator. Interview was conducted telephonically with former Staff S 1 from 11:05 to 11:20 AM. The termination date from the facility for Staff S 1 was 06/01/2022. Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, July 24, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220607104211
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit resident Staff covered resident's face Staff threatened resident with harm
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Karine Filikyan. The purpose of the visit is a subsequent complaint visit and to deliver findings from the original complaint dated 06/07/2022. The initial visit was conducted on 06/14/2022 and the following was done: Facility tour was conducted at 10:00 AM which included 6 client bedrooms, 2 client bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen, front and backyard area. Interviews were conducted at 10:15 AM to 11:00 AM with S 1 and Administrator. A subsequent visit was conducted on 10/05/2022 and included the following: Interviews were conducted at 10:50 AM to 11:05 AM with Administrator. Interview was conducted telephonically with former Staff S 1 from 11:05 to 11:20 AM. At today's visit interviews were conducted with Staff S2 and Resident's # R 2- R 4 from 930AM to 10:10 AM. Interviews with Staff S 2 and Resident's 2-4 were done telephonically with Licensing Program— CDSS inspection report, June 22, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220607104211

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are unable to communicate due to language barrier Medications were left accessible to residents Staff do not follow protocals to prevent the spread of COVID-19
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Subsequent visit made 10/17/2022 to correct the sections cited on 809D only. Findings remain the same. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility. LPA was greeted by caregiver who was not wearing a mask and did not screen LPA as required. Administrator arrived a little later. Facility tour was conducted at 9:47am which included 6 client bedrooms, 2 client bathrooms, living room, dining room and kitchen. Interviews were conducted with Administrator, House manager and staff #1 and #2. Interviews were conducted with R1 and R2 Regarding allegation: Staff do not follow protocols to prevent the spread of COVID-19 LPA was greeted by S1 and S1 was not wearing a mask and did not screen LPA at entrance. A tray was set up at entrance to screen, but screening was not done. LPA observed Administrator and house manager wearing mask most of the time of visit, Administrator would pull mask down under her chin and house manager wore mask under her nose. Subs— CDSS inspection report, October 17, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220418123049
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are unable to communicate due to language barrier Medications were left accessible to residents Staff do not follow protocals to prevent the spread of COVID-19
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility. LPA was greeted by caregiver who was not wearing a mask and did not screen LPA as required. Administrator arrived a little later. Facility tour was conducted at 9:47am which included 6 client bedrooms, 2 client bathrooms, living room, dining room and kitchen. Interviews were conducted with Administrator, House manager and staff #1 and #2. Interviews were conducted with R1 and R2 Regarding allegation: Staff do not follow protocols to prevent the spread of COVID-19 LPA was greeted by S1 and S1 was not wearing a mask and did not screen LPA at entrance. A tray was set up at entrance to screen, but screening was not done. LPA observed Administrator and house manager wearing mask most of the time of visit, Administrator would pull mask down under her chin and house manager wore mask under her nose. Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, April 26, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220418123049
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are unable to communicate with residents due to language barrier. Staff not wearing masks.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This report is amended to remove staff names. Previously issued LIC 9099s are rescinded. The amendment does not change the findings. LPA Nune Margaryan redelivered report on 04/14/2022 to obtain signatures. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Staff 1. Initial visit was conducted on 1/26/22 and the following was done: Facility tour was conducted at 10:AM which included 6 client bedrooms, 2 client bathrooms, living room, dining room and kitchen. Interviews were conducted at 10:15 AM with Client 1 and 11:30 AM with Client 2. Interviews were conducted from 10:30 AM to 11:30 AM with Staff 1 -3. In regards to the allegation Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to language barrier, on initial visit conducted 1/26/22 based on LPA's observation staff member who greeted LPA had difficulty communicating because of the language barrier. LPA asked questions of where could the computer be set up and is the administr— CDSS inspection report, March 2, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220118125103

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 16 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
7
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
8
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
16
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 843-5873
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Chateau Magnolia? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.