Large community · Licensed for 158 · Reseda
Ambassador Garden
7324 Canby Avenue, Reseda, CA 91335Licensed since 2002
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
- Licensed for 158: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 69 residents
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
69 NON-AMBULATORY 1ST FLOOR ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Assisted living
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Help with bathing or showering
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Respite / short-term stays
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Help with dressing and grooming
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Medication management
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Works with hospice
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Hiring checksCarefully hand-picked staff
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Continuing education cadenceOngoing unspecified
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Emergency call system
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Fire sprinklers
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
As needs change
Medicines
Level of medication service: assistance with self administration
ambassadorgarden.com · October 5, 2026
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Ambassador Garden: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$3,050a month to start
Likely $2,350–$3,900
From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Costs & moving in
What the base rate includesUtilities
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Term of the admission agreementMonth to month
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
What costs extraPhone · TV
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$3,050likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$3,050likely $2,350–$3,900
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $2,350–$4,100
- $3,050
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $2,950–$7,400
- $5,550
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes14 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $8,510
14 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,900–$8,250.
- Northridge Valley Senior LivingNorthridge · 1.8 mi · Large community$3,065Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Savant of TarzanaTarzana · 2.0 mi · Large community$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Avantgarde Senior Living of TarzanaTarzana · 2.1 mi · Large community$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Brookdale Gardens of TarzanaTarzana · 2.2 mi · Large community$3,065Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
- Atria TarzanaTarzana · 2.6 mi · Large community$8,300Listed on its own website · assisted/independent living studio · seen October 27, 2026
- The Village at NorthridgeNorthridge · 2.8 mi · Large community$8,510Listed on its own website · assisted living, starting price · seen October 27, 2026
- Ivy Park at Woodland HillsWoodland Hills · 3.5 mi · Large community$4,395Listed on its own website · private studio & companion suites available floor plans · seen October 27, 2026
- The Variel of Woodland HillsWoodland Hills · 3.6 mi · Large community$7,900Listed on its own website · assisted living apartments, starting price · seen October 5, 2026
- The VeredEncino · 4.3 mi · Large community$7,500Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Aegis Living Granada HillsGranada Hills · 4.3 mi · Large community$7,000Listed on its own website · private apartments, starting price · seen October 27, 2026
- The Gardens at Park BalboaVan Nuys · 4.4 mi · Large community$3,400Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at West HillsWest Hills · 4.5 mi · Large community$4,595Listed on its own website · private studio & companion suites available floor plans · seen October 27, 2026
- Valley Vista Senior LivingVan Nuys · 5.0 mi · Large community$3,395Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmont Village EncinoSherman Oaks · 5.0 mi · Large community$4,975Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (15)Private rooms · Outdoor space · Shared / companion rooms
Private rooms
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Outdoor spaceOutdoor courtyard with fountain · Courtyard with fountain · Garden · Outdoor Common Areas
Outdoor courtyard with fountain · Courtyard with fountain — reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Garden — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Outdoor Common Areas — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Common areasComfortable TV Lounge · Pool room · Activity Room with big screen TV · Lobby · Fitness and wellness facilities · Indoor Common Areas
Comfortable TV Lounge · Pool room · Activity Room with big screen TV · Lobby — reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Fitness and wellness facilities — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Indoor Common Areas — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Private bathroom
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Room typesShared studios · Private studios · Private · Semi Private Studios
Shared studios · Private studios — reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Private · Semi Private Studios — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Housekeeping frequencyWeekly
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Roll-in / accessible shower
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Grab bars and rails
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
AmenitiesPool room with exercise equipment · Activity room with big screen TV · Spacious lobby with aquarium · Exercise equipment · Aquarium · Swimming Pool
Pool room with exercise equipment · Activity room with big screen TV · Spacious lobby with aquarium · Exercise equipment · Aquarium — reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Swimming Pool — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Air conditioning in the room
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Salon or barber
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Emergency call system in the room
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (3)Meals provided · Special diets supported · Places to eat on site
Meals provided
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Special diets supportedLow / No Sodium · No Sugar
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Places to eat on siteGarden view dining room · Garden view dinning room
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (3)Activity types offered · Activity calendar published · Religious services at the home
Activity types offeredActivities On-site
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Activity calendar published
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Religious services at the home
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence (1)Residents may bring a pet
Residents may bring a petReported no
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (4)Contact form · Neighborhood or area named · Setting
- Open on the website
Contact form
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Neighborhood or area namedReseda, CA 91335
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
SettingUrban
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Public transit access claimed
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
About the home (1)Brand or trade name
Brand or trade nameAmbassador Garden
Reported on ambassadorgarden.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Where it is
7324 Canby Avenue, Reseda, CA 91335Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Northridge Hospital Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.1 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197603652 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 16 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 4 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera arrived unannounced to conduct the required annual inspection, LPA and met with Administrator Sofi Druker, and the purpose for today’s visit was explained. The facility is licensed to serve 158 Ambulatory Residents ages 60 and over, of which 69 Residents may be Non-Ambulatory on the first floor. The facility has an approved Hospice Waiver on file for thirty (3) residents. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Infection Control: Facility maintains the required Infection Control Plan. Operational Requirements: Facility maintains the required liability insurance and Surety Bond that has an expiration date of 4/1/27. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: LPA toured facility, a total of 10 residents’ bedrooms/units were checked and had the required closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably available. The resident rooms have signal systems located in each bathroom that were tested an operating properly. There are smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors and an emergency sprinkler system throughout the facility that are operable and in compliance. The fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility and are fully charged. No bodies of water were observed at the facility. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. Hygiene products are readily available. The hot water temperature was tested throughout the facility resident private bathrooms and measured within the required range of 105-120 degrees. Staffing & Personnel Records-Training: There appears to be sufficient staffing at all times in the facility. Staff have criminal record clearance, current First-Aid/CPR/AED training along with training in postural supports, medication assistance, and other ongoing training are documented in personnel files. Administrator Sofi Druker certificate expires on 3/3/27. LPA reviewed 5 staff files with no issues. (Continued on LIC809-C) Resident Records-Incident Reports: Resident files are kept in a secure location and have the following documents in their files - Pre-admission appraisal/Appraisal Needs & Services Plan, Admission Agreements, Identification & Emergency Information and current Physician's Report. LPA reviewed 9 Resident files with no issues. Residents Rights-Information: Residents are provided with telephone and internet at the facility. The facility has the following posters posted on each floor/section: Residents Rights, Complaint Poster, and Ombudsman. Planned Activities: Facility provides scheduled activities with a monthly calendar and the required full-time staff that conduct and evaluate planned activities. There is sufficient space both indoor and outdoor for activities. Food Service: The kitchen was observed for the ability to prepare and serve food. LPA observed an appropriate food supply of two (2) days of perishables and one week (7 days) of non-perishables. Incidental Medical & Dental: Medication is properly labeled and are centrally stored and are in their original containers. A total of 10 Residents medications were reviewed with no issues. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has an Emergency Disaster Plan with contact numbers and at least 2 relocation sites. The last drill was conducted on 5/11/26. Residents with Special Health Needs: Facility admits residents who use oxygen and hospice services. During tour LPA observed the required sinage outside of rooms that have residents that use oxygen. There is currently 1 Resident using hospice services, LPA reviewed both facility file and hospice file with no issues observed. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code, there were no deficiencies observed during todays visit. Exit interview held and a copy of the report was provided to Administrator Sofi Druker.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 13, 2026
Apr 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility is kept free of pests. Staff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to resident.
At 10:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Huma Rahimi conducted an unannouncedinitial complaint visit. LPA met with the staff Isabella Litmanovich and the Administrator Sofi Druker was contacted and arrived shortly after. LPA disclosed the reason for the visit. At 10:10 AM, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At approximately 10:15 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. At 10:20 AM, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Physician’s report, Admission Agreement, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, Staff Training, Incontenence Care Logs, House keeping Logs, etc., relevant to the investigation. Between 10:30 AM – 2:30 PM, LPA interviewed the Administrator, two (2) staff, a housekeeper, a MedTech, and eight (8) residents. Continue on LIC 9099C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff does not ensure facility is kept free of pests. It was alleged that facility staff failed to ensure the facility was kept free of pests, specifically that on 03/25/2026, Resident #1’s (R1’s) room was filled with flies. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, a MedTech, two (2) staff, the housekeeper, and eight (8) residents, including R1. The Administrator reported that the facility contracts with Conirol Pest Control Company for monthly services and reminded residents to keep doors and windows closed and avoid leaving food out. Staff and the housekeeper reported daily routine cleaning with weekly deep cleaning and confirmed they had not observed pest activity. Residents, including R1, stated they had not seen flies or pests in their rooms or common areas and described the facility as clean and well maintained. On 04/01/2026 at 10:15 AM, during a tour of the facility, LPA did not observe any flies in resident rooms or common areas. Staff were observed performing deep cleaning throughout the facility. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, there was no evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to resident. It was alleged that facility staff failed to provide adequate care and supervision to R1 and that R1 was left without assistance after returning from the hospital on 03/25/2026. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, a MedTech, two (2) staff, and eight (8) residents, including R1. Staff reported that residents are assisted with mobility, toileting, and personal care according to their needs, monitored at least every two hours, and immediately assisted upon returning from the hospital. During the interview, R1 stated they feel safe, well cared for, and receive timely assistance with personal care, including incontinence care, typically within approximately ten (10) minutes. Residents interviewed confirmed staff generally respond promptly and no resident is left unattended. LPA reviewed R1’s Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, confirming R1 is non-ambulatory and requires assistance for incontinence. Incontinence care logs for March 2026 indicate care was provided at least four (4) times daily. On 04/01/2026 at 10:15 AM, during the facility tour, LPA observed staff providing care and timely assistance to residents. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Appeal rights explained and exit interview conducted. Copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 1, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260326094022
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in resident developing multiple pressure injuries.
At 9:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Huma Rahimi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with the staff Kristina Papazyan and the Administrator Sofi Druker was contacted and arrived shortly after. LPA disclosed the reason for the visit. An initial visit was conducted on 05/15/2025. At 10:20 AM, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At approximately 10:30 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. At 10:50 AM, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Physician’s report, Admission Agreement, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, Staff Training, etc., relevant to the investigation. Between 11:00 AM – 1:55 PM, LPA interviewed the Administrator and eight (8) residents. During today's visit, at 10:45 AM, LPA also interviewed Staff #1 (S1). Continue on LIC 9099C Unsubstantiated Staff neglect resulted in resident developing multiple pressure injuries. It is alleged that the facility staff neglected Resident #1 (R1) which resulted in developing multiple pressure wound injuries in the buttocks area with emitting pus and was not receiving home health or hospice services. To investigate this allegation LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator who denied ever retaining a resident with a prohibited health condition. The Administrator also informed LPA that R1 is receiving home health services since his/her admission to the facility and the treatment for the redness on the buttock area since 04/24/2025. However, on 05/12/2025 a small opening was observed by the facility staff on R1’s buttocks area which was immediately reported to R1’s Primary Care Physician (PCP). Subsequently, R1’s PCP advised the Administrator to take R1 to the hospital emergency room (ER) for further evaluation. On 05/13/2025, R1 was transported to ER and R1 was discharged the same day from the hospital. On 05/16/2025, LPA requested and reviewed R1’s hospital medical records and did not observe any medical information to conclude R1’s pressure wound injuries stage. The medical records indicated that R1 has a small ulceration with no necrosis or eschar. Lastly, interviews with R1 and seven (7) other residents revealed that they are happy with the care being provided by the facility staff and never felt neglected. No sufficient evidence was obtained, thus based on interviews and record review this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit Interview Conducted. A copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 9, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250514142748
Apr 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff illegally evicted resident in care. Staff did not issue refund to resident or resident's authorized representative.
At 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to the above facility. LPA met with the staff Ezabella Litmanovich and the Administrator Sofi Druker was contacted and arrived shortly after. LPA disclosed the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were made. At 9:35 AM LPA requested resident and staff roster. At 9:45 AM, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not to Admission Agreement, Physician’s Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, and etc., relevant to the investigation. At 9:55 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour. Between 10:20 AM. – 2:25 PM., LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator, two (2) MedTechs, two (2) staff, Resident #1 (R1) Physician Office Staff, R1's family, and eight (8) out of eight (8) residents. On 04/18/2025, LPA conducted a Community Care Licensing facility file review of the facility’s plan of operation for eviction procedures and policy on refunds. Continue on LIC 9099C Unsubstantiated Staff illegally evicted resident in care. It was alleged that the facility evicted Resident #1 (R1) illegally. To investigate this allegation LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator who denied the allegation. Administrator informed LPA that per R1’s family request a non-emergency ambulance was called to take R1 to the hospital on 04/07/2025. LPA was informed that R1 was not going to return to the facility and the Administrator refunded the prorated monthly payment to R1’s family. LPA contacted R1’s family member who confirmed that R1 still remains in the hospital and as of today date no discharge orders been received. Lastly, during today’s visit LPA observed that R1’s medication and other personal belongings were still present at the facility and R1’s room was still vacant. Therefore, based on interviews, record review, and LPA’s observation this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff did not issue refund to resident or resident's authorized representative. It was alleged that the facility refused to refund the full amount of $2,133 to R1's family for R1's stay at the facility from 04/04/2025 to 04/07/2025. To investigate this allegation LPA reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent facility and R1’s records. Furthermore, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator who informed LPA that upon R1's family request for a refund the Administrator contacted the corporate office to issue a check payable to R1's family in the prorated amount of $1,852.48. Lastly, the check was mailed to R1's family on 04/15/2025. Based on Safety Code 1569.652 and Assembly Bill 261 a refund is to be issued within 15 days after the personal property of a resident has been removed. Therefore, based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report was issuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250417115746
Mar 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 9:35 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Huma Rahimi, conducted an unannounced annual inspection at the facility mentioned above. LPA was greeted at the front desk by the staff Ezabella Litmanovich and later met with the Administrator, Sofi Druker, and explained the reason for the visit. Physical tour was conducted with the Administrator and LPA observed the following: The facility is a two story building with private and shared bedrooms, private bathrooms, kitchen, dining room, recreation rooms, common areas, patios, and outdoor areas. It has an approved fire clearance for 89 ambulatory residents and 69 non-ambulatory residents on the first floor only. Approved hospice waivers for 3. Elevator: The facility had one functioning elevator. LPA observed a posting for the facility’s emergency evacuation routes which was clearly labeled. Bedrooms: LPA and Administrator toured vacant and occupied bedrooms on the first and second floor. LPA observed lamps, nightstands, beds, linens, and private bathrooms with liquid soap, hand towels, and trash cans. Private bathrooms also had grab bars in the showers and around the toilets. Bathrooms: The facility currently has one public restroom on the first floor and two public restrooms on the second floor. The bathroom was sanitary with liquid soap, paper towels, handwashing instruction sign, and a trash can with a tight-fitting lid. At 9:55 AM, LPAs measured the hot water temperature on the first floor to be 120.0F and 118.9F on the second floor. Outside of the bathroom was the facility’s telephone. It is a payphone, but quarters are available free of charge at the front desk. The facility has an additional telephone on the second floor for incoming resident calls. Continue on LIC 809C Fire Safety: LPA observed that the facility has fifteen (15) fire extinguishers, and all were fully charged and last serviced on 01/21/2025. LPA observed all required postings by the front desk of the facility. The facility has fire sprinklers throughout the inside of the facility, resident bedrooms, hallways, dining room, and outdoors as well. At 1:00 p.m. LPA reviewed the most recent fire safety report from the Los Angeles Fire Department conducted on 02/17/2025. All systems were functional and passed inspection. At 1:10 p.m. LPA tested the call system in Room #115 to be functional. Staff responded to the call within thirty (30) seconds. Between 12:00 PM to 1:30 PM, LPA reviewed records of eight (8) resident and four (4) staff. Resident and staff records appeared to be complete and updated. No deficiency cited during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered. Common Areas: All floors, walls, and ceilings were clean. Furniture in the dining room, lounges, living room, and activity room were clean and in good repair. Hand sanitizer was readily available. Facility posted the most recent Community Care Licensing (CCL) Provider Information Notice at the front desk, along with recent CCL reports, an activity schedule, resident rights poster, and a confidential complaint hotline. At 10:00 AM LPA measured the room temperature to be 70 F downstairs and 73 F upstairs. Outdoor Space: LPA and Administrator toured the outside space. One gazebo was designated for resident smoking, had ashtrays, and were at least 20 feet from buildings. LPA observed two (2) locked storage sheds which contained gardening tools in parking lot area. Sufficient space was available for activities. LPA walked on the south side of the facility’s exterior and tested an exit door which was unlocked from the inside. LPA observed an electronic gate on the north side of the facility’s exterior which led to the employee parking lot. Laundry: In the back parking lot, LPA observed a laundry room with two (2) washers and two (2) dryers. Detergents were locked in a closet. Medication Room: LPA observed a locked Medication Room and met with a Med Tech who supervised and dispensed medication. Storage: LPA observed a storage room with sufficient emergency food and water supplies. LPA also observed a locked maintenance room with cleaning supplies. LPA observed an additional, locked storage room on the second floor designated for PPE. Kitchen: LPA observed menus outside of the kitchen and dining room. Menus applied to typical and diabetic diets. The kitchen floors and surfaces were clean, and all food was sealed and labeled. Cleaning supplies remained by the dishwashing area and were not stored with food. The dining room contained tables with designated seating with labels for residents with special diets. Continue on LIC 809Cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2025
Jan 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
At 2:00 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi conducted a case management visit to the facility to check on the safety and wellness of the Eaton Fire evacuated residents from Inn at the Park Ventura with the license number 197609623. LPA met with the Administrator Sofi Druker and explained the reason for the visit. LPA and the Administrator conducted a physical plant tour of the facility to ensure there are no immediate health and safety issues . LPA was informed that the residents from Inn at the Park Ventura did not move in to the above facility and LPA did not observe any evacuated residents at the time of the visit. No immediate health and safety issues were noted. No further action is necessary at this time. Exit Interview conducted. Copy of report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 10:00 AM Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Huma Rahimi, and Nicholas Reed, conducted an unannounced annual inspection at the facility mentioned above. LPAs were greeted at the front desk by the staff Ezabella Litmanovich and later met with the Administrator, Sofi Druker, and explained the reason for the visit. Physical tour was conducted with the Administrator and LPAs observed the following: The facility was last visited on 03/19/2024, for a complaint visit. The facility is a two story building with private and shared bedrooms, private bathrooms, kitchen, dining room, recreation rooms, common areas, patios, and outdoor areas. It has an approved fire clearance for 89 ambulatory residents and 69 non-ambulatory residents on the first floor only. Approved hospice waivers for 3. Elevator: The facility had one functioning elevator. LPAs observed a posting for the facility’s emergency evacuation routes which was clearly labeled. Bedrooms: LPAs and Administrator toured vacant and occupied bedrooms on the first and second floor. LPAs observed lamps, nightstands, beds, linens, and private bathrooms with liquid soap, hand towels, and trash cans. Private bathrooms also had grab bars in the showers and around the toilets. Bathrooms: The facility currently has one public restroom on the first floor and two public restrooms on the second floor. The bathroom was sanitary with liquid soap, paper towels, handwashing instruction sign, and a trash can with a tight-fitting lid. At 10:20 AM, LPAs measured the hot water temperature on the first floor to be 106.8F and 111.7F on the second floor. Outside of the bathroom was the facility’s telephone. It is a payphone, but quarters are available free of charge at the front desk. The facility has an additional telephone on the second floor for incoming resident calls. Continue on LIC 809C Common Areas: All floors, walls, and ceilings were clean. Furniture in the dining room, lounges, living room, and activity room were clean and in good repair. Hand sanitizer was readily available. Facility posted the most recent Community Care Licensing (CCL) Provider Information Notice at the front desk, along with recent CCL reports, an activity schedule, resident rights poster, and a confidential complaint hotline. At 10:35 AM LPAs measured the room temperature to be 73F. Outdoor Space: LPAs and Administrator toured the outside space. One gazebo was designated for resident smoking, had ashtrays, and were at least 20 feet from buildings. LPAs observed two (2) locked storage sheds which contained gardening tools in parking lot area. Sufficient space was available for activities. LPAs walked on the south side of the facility’s exterior and tested an exit door which was unlocked from the inside. LPAs observed an electronic gate on the north side of the facility’s exterior which led to the employee parking lot. Laundry: In the back parking lot, LPAs observed a laundry room with two (2) washers and two (2) dryers. Detergents were locked in a closet. Medication Room: LPAs observed a locked Medication Room and met with a Med Tech who supervised and dispensed medication. Med Tech informed LPAs that all residents have at least a 30 day supply of medication. Storage: LPAs observed a storage room with sufficient emergency food and water supplies. LPAs also observed a locked maintenance room with cleaning supplies. LPAs observed an additional, locked storage room on the second floor designated for PPE. Kitchen: LPAs observed menus outside of the kitchen and dining room. Menus applied to typical and diabetic diets. The kitchen floors and surfaces were clean, and all food was sealed and labeled. Cleaning supplies remained by the dishwashing area and were not stored with food. The dining room contained tables with designated seating with labels for residents with special diets. Continue on LIC 809C Fire Safety: LPAs observed that the facility has fifteen (15) fire extinguishers, and all were fully charged and last serviced on 11/29/2023. LPAs observed all required postings by the front desk of the facility. The facility has fire sprinklers throughout the inside of the facility, resident bedrooms, hallways, dining room, and outdoors as well. At 12:45 p.m. LPAs reviewed the most recent fire safety report from the Los Angeles Fire Department conducted on 12/04/2023. All systems were functional and passed inspection. At 1:00 p.m. LPAs tested the call system in Room #207 to be functional. Staff responded to the call within thirty (30) seconds. LPAs observed that one screen door was not in good repair. LPAs also observed that the fire door glass was cracked. Between 1:00 PM to 2:30 PM, LPAs reviewed records of seven (7) resident and four (4) staff. Resident and staff records appeared to be complete and updated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2024
Mar 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff yelled at resident while in care Staff did not ensure that resident received assistance while in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Sofi Drucker and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:12 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:42 AM, reviewed facility documents between 10:00 AM and 11:000 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that staff yelled at resident while in care, it was alleged that a staff yelled at Resident #1 (R1). LPA's interview with eight (8) residents or more than 10% of the current census on 09/22/23 between 10:50 AM to 11:45 AM and today between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that eight (8) out of eight (8) residents did not experience being yelled at by any staff nor witnessed any resident being yelled at by any staff. LPA's interview with the administrator today at 11:35 AM also revealed that whenever she used the public address (PA) system for general address, she has to talk loud because some of the residents are hard of hearing. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Further interviews with staff also revealed that R1 was also hard of hearing so people around R1 including staff tend to talk loudly and near R1. Regarding the allegation that staff did not ensure that residents received assistance while in care, it was alleged that whenever R1 calls via intercom, staff do not respond. LPA's interview with eight (8) residents or more than 10% of the current census on 09/22/23 between 10:50 AM to 11:45 AM and today between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that eight (8) out of eight (8) residents the staff provided all the care they need and staff are respectful and attentive. All eight (8) residents interviewed also stated that staff respond to their calls almost immediately or within ten (10) minutes. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visits, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230919091551
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 8 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Jan 10, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At approximately 10:05 a.m. on 01/10/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced annual visit. LPA met with the Administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. LPA and Administrator toured the facility inside and out. The facility was last visited on 12/20/2022 for a complaint visit. It is a two story building with private and shared bedrooms, private bathrooms, kitchen, dining room, recreation rooms, common areas, patios, and outdoor areas. It has an approved fire clearance for 89 ambulatory residents and 69 non-ambulatory residents on the first floor only. Approved hospice waivers for 3. Upon entry, LPA observed signs for the facility’s masking and visitation policies. COVID precautions were posted throughout the building. Other postings included the Ombudsman contacts, emergency disaster plan, facility license, facility sketch, grievance procedure, rights of resident councils, non-discrimination notice, theft and loss policy, daily menu, and activity calendar. The confidential complaint sign had been ripped off, so LPA instructed the Administrator to repost the notice. LPA was screened for infectious disease upon entry. The screening station contained a digital thermometer, visitor log, hand sanitizer, and N95 masks. All staff were observed wearing N95 masks. Walls, floors, ceilings, windows, screens, and blinds were clean and in good repair. At approximately 10:30 a.m. LPA observed residents participating in a staff-led exercise program in the main living room. LPA also observed outside contractors repairing A/C units. The facility elevator was operational, and staff and LPA used it to access the second floor. Fire extinguishers were posted at hallway corners. At 10:32 a.m. LPA observed a fully charged fire extinguisher on the second floor. It was last service on 11/12/2022. Room 212 was inspected. It contained a chair, nightstand, lamp, storage, and bed with adequate bedding. All furnishings were clean and in good condition. At 10:43 a.m. the water temperature from the bathroom faucet was measured at 112.1 degrees Fahrenheit. The bathroom contained liquid soap, trash can, and grab bars near the toilet and shower. At 10:48 a.m. staff tested the smoke detector to be functional. At 10:52 a.m. staff tested the carbon monoxide detector near the dining room to be functional. LPA observed an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food in the kitchen. Surfaces were sanitary. Cleaning solutions were stored away from food. Sharps and cleaning solutions were attended to by staff and inaccessible to residents. The maintenance room, nurse room, and medication room were all locked. LPA observed a fully stocked first aid kit in the medication room. The back patio contained a designated smoking area. Emergency exits paths were free of hazards and unlocked. A covered seating area contained furniture in good repair. At 11:35 a.m. LPA measured the room temperature to be 75.4 degrees Fahrenheit. The Administrator notified LPA that although the elevator is currently functional, it will need to be shut down soon for further maintenance. Maintenance is scheduled for February 2023 and a city inspection will follow. LPA advised the Administrator to inform all residents of the scheduled maintenance once exact timeframes are known. During today's inspection, the facility is in compliance with Title 22 regulations. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2023
20225 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 20, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility has mold/ mildew problem Facility elevator is not operating Resident has been confined to their room Residents are locked in facility at night.
At 9:50 a.m. on 12/20/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with the Administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed no immediate health or safety concerns. LPA interviewed 10% of residents and inspected rooms from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff from 12:00 p.m. to 12:40 p.m. Regarding the allegation “Facility has a mold/mildew problem”, it was alleged resident rooms contain mold and mildew. From interviews, most residents and staff had no issues with mold or mildew in the facility. From room inspections, LPA noticed some minor signs of wear and tear but no immediate or potential risks to health or safety. Based on interviews and inspections, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation “Facility elevator is not operating”, it was alleged the facility elevator was not working for an extended period of time. The allegation was previously investigated on 11/30/2022 as part of complaint investigation #31-AS-20221129091305. At 2:38 p.m. on 11/30/2022 LPA reviewed records related to elevator repairs and facility efforts to alleviate the situation. From interviews today, most residents noted the elevator has been out of order for several months, but they have not had issues using the stairwells to access the first floor. The Administrator has offered all residents room changes to the first floor, and staff have accommodated resident needs in the meantime. Staff have transported walkers, groceries, and personal belongings up and down the stairs, and meals and medications have been offered to upstairs residents. Based on interviews, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Resident has been confined to their room”, it was alleged Resident #1 (R1) has been confined to their room due to their inability to use the stairs and elevator. From interviews, R1 noted they can get down the stairs in an emergency. R1 preferred not to be carried or transported by other means. R1 and the Administrator noted a room change was offered, but the room was not to the liking of R1. R1 further stated that they want to keep their second floor room but want the elevator to work soon. Facility offerings for tray service and medication have met R1’s needs. Based on interviews, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Residents are locked in facility at night”, it was alleged residents are unable to leave the facility at night after the doors are locked. From interviews, R1 stated there is only one overnight staff with the key for the front door. The Administrator stated the doors remain unlocked from the inside but locked from the outside. The facility locks the doors every night at 9:00 p.m. for resident safety. Based on interviews, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided. Appeal rights discussed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2022 · control 31-AS-20221207140538
Dec 7, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident in care. Staff confiscated resident's belongings.
At 9:55 a.m. on 12/07/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with staff and later Administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. At approximately 10:15 a.m. LPA conducted a records review. From 10:50 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. LPA interviewed the Administrator, Staff #1 (S1), and Staff #2 (S2). LPA and Administrator toured the facility, resident rooms, and the outside areas. No immediate health and safety concerns were observed. At 11:35 a.m. the Administrator shared pertinent photographs with LPA. Regarding the allegation above, it was alleged staff hit Resident #1 (R1). From interviews, no staff were aware of instances of hitting or abuse. S1 stated R1 was normally quiet, but R1 sexually and verbally harassed staff after becoming intoxicated. The Administrator noted R1’s history of alcohol abuse and knew R1 did not want to return to the facility. (continued on LIC 9099-C page) Unsubstantiated From record review, the social worker at the hospital noted R1’s intoxication as R1 alleged the staff abuse. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation above, it was alleged staff took R1’s belongings and would not release them. From interviews, the Administrator and staff did not know of any requests for R1’s belongings to be released. The Administrator also noted R1’s room had a cockroach infestation from spoiled meat in their refrigerator. S2 confirmed the cockroach problem. From record review, a pest control company serviced the room on 11/28/2022 and removed the refrigerator. R1’s responsible party was notified and said to remove all spoiled food. S1 stated R1 was admitted to the hospital on 11/29/22. LPA observed all belongings listed on R1’s inventory form (LIC 621) were still present at the facility. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2022 · control 31-AS-20221201090344
Dec 7, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Licensee InitiatedReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Licensee Initiated
During the complaint investigation for complaint # 31-AS-20221201090344, Administrator Sofi Druker requested guidance from Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed. At 11:45 a.m. on 12/7/22, LPA initiated a case management visit. From 11:45 a.m. to 12:40 p.m. LPA interviewed the Administrator Sofi Druker and Resident #1 (R1). LPA attempted to assist the maintenance of a broken call system pull cord in R1’s bathroom. Multiple attempts to fix the call system were made. In respecting the personal rights of R1, the facility will wait to fix the call system until R1 leaves the facility or requests maintenance. The call system pull cord in the main part of R1’s room was functional. Exit interview conducted. Copy of Report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2022
Nov 30, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair (broken elevator).
At 2:15 p.m. on 11/30/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with Administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. LPA and Administrator toured the facility inside and out. No immediate health and safety concerns were observed. Regarding the allegation above, it was alleged the facility elevator is broken, and the facility has not accommodated residents during the maintenance. At 2:20 p.m. LPA inspected the elevator and elevator control room. At 2:30 p.m. LPA interviewed the Administrator. At 2:38 p.m. LPA conducted a record review. From observations, the facility posted signs on the elevator stating it was inoperable and estimated to be repaired by 12/05/22. In the elevator control room, LPA observed a new, large barrel of oil, two packages with new parts, and a new control box. From interviews, the Administrator stated the elevator is old and therefore has been difficult to repair. The facility hired a company in June to fix the elevator, and it worked for a month and a half. The elevator broke again in September, and the facility hired a new company to completely renovate the elevator. Unsubstantiated Since then, the Administrator has called the elevator company every day for updates. Administrator stated the company was at the facility just ten minutes before LPA arrived to deliver the large barrel of oil. From record review, the facility reported the elevator’s maintenance on an LIC 624 form on 07/09/2022. The facility accommodated residents by offering tray service to bring food to residents 3 times each day. Med techs brought medication to residents on the second floor, and the facility offered to temporarily move residents to the first floor if requested. The Administrator called LPA at 3:27 p.m. on 07/19/2022 to report that elevator parts had been found, but all 5 technicians from the company were sick with COVID. LPA observed a check written to the new elevator repair company from 09/14/2022 and the “Elevator Modernization Contract” with the new elevator repair company, signed on 10/14/2022. LPA also observed the Dining Room Absence Log which showed room numbers, times, and meals to be brought to residents. An email sent on 11/08/2022 cited supply chain challenges as a reason for delays in parts and showed an estimated date of completion as 01/03/2023. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 30, 2022 · control 31-AS-20221129091305
Aug 19, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Illegal eviction
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the allegation above. LPA met with the administrator and explained the reason for this visit. Illegal eviction It is alleged that resident # 1 (R1) was being illegally evicted because R1 did not pay all of their rent and the facility is not accepting partial payment. LPA conducted interview with R1 from 10:50-11:30am regarding this allegation. LPA interviewed the administrator regarding this allegation from 11:30-12:10pm. LPA reviewed R1's facility file and obtained copies of pertinent information from 12:10-12:40pm. Information obtained from interviews and documentation R1 has not paid their full proper rent for the months of June, July, and August of 2022. R1's rent is 1231.77 and for the month of June 2022 R1 paid 1,000 dollars, for July 2022 another 1000 dollars, and for August 2022 only 750 dollars was paid. R1 was given a thirty day eviction on 8/10/22 due to non-payment of rent. LPA reviewed a copy of the eviction notice given and after review it is a lawful eviction. R1 has since agreed to pay the balance owed and the eviction notice has been rescinded. Based on the information obtained this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit Interview conducted. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220811150301
Feb 10, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At approximately 12:55 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced, annual inspection using the Infection Control Domain of the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tools. LPA met with Administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. Census: 72 Entry: LPA observed signs pertaining to the facility’s visitation policy and masking requirement at the main entrance. LPA observed a rear entrance for employees which had a digital thermometer, hand sanitizer, surgical masks, and an employee log with daily symptom and temperature documentation. Screening: Upon entry, staff screened LPA for temperature and symptoms. Staff prompted LPA to record temperature, any symptoms, and contact tracing information in a visitor log. 4 bottles of hand sanitizer were available at the entrance. LPA also observed signs for coughing etiquette, social distancing, handwashing, signs and symptoms of COVID-19, cleaning practices, and droplet precautions. At approximately 1:15 PM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour. Elevator: The facility had one elevator. The elevator had a sign for social distancing which noted a limit of 2 persons at a time. LPA observed a posting for the facility’s emergency evacuation routes which was clearly labeled. Bedrooms: LPA and Administrator toured vacant and occupied bedrooms on the first and second floor. All bedrooms were tidy with operational appliances. LPA observed lamps, nightstands, beds, linens, and private bathrooms with liquid soap, hand towels, and trash cans. Private bathrooms also had grab bars in the showers and around the toilets. Bathrooms: The facility currently has one public restroom on the first floor. The bathroom was sanitary with liquid soap, paper towels, handwashing instruction sign, and a trash can with a tight-fitting lid. Outside of the bathroom was the facility’s telephone. It is a payphone, but quarters are available free of charge at the front desk. The facility has an additional telephone on the second floor for incoming resident calls. Common Areas: All hallways had signs about COVID-19 policies and precautions in both English and Spanish. All floors, walls, and ceilings were clean. Furniture in the dining room, lounges, living room, and activity room were clean and in good repair. Hand sanitizer was readily available. Facility posted the most recent Community Care Licensing (CCL) Provider Information Notice at the front desk, along with recent CCL reports, an activity schedule, resident rights poster, and a confidential complaint hotline. Fire Safety: LPA observed 2 fire extinguishers on the second and 1 on the first floor. All extinguishers were fully charged and last inspected on 02/07/2022. All smoke detectors tested were operational. The facility has fire sprinklers throughout the inside of the facility, resident bedrooms, hallways, dining room, and outdoors as well. Outdoor Space: LPA and Administrator toured the outside space. Benches had red X’s made of tape to designate social distancing areas. A set of benches which were too close were taped off. Two gazebos were designated for resident smoking, had ashtrays, and were at least 20 feet from buildings. LPA observed 2 locked storage sheds which contained gardening tools. LPA and staff walked on the south side of the facility’s exterior and tested an exit door which was unlocked from the inside. LPA observed an electronic gate on the north side of the facility’s exterior which led to the employee parking lot. Laundry: In the back parking lot, LPA observed a laundry room with 2 washers and 1 dryer. Administrator explained that resident laundry is cleaned on an individual basis. The facility can sanitize the machines after each use. Medication Room: LPA and Administrator entered a locked Medication Room and met with a Med Tech who supervised and dispensed medication. Med Tech informed LPA that all residents have at least a 30 day supply of medication. Storage: LPA observed a storage room with sufficient emergency food and water supplies. LPA also observed a locked maintenance room with cleaning supplies. LPA observed an additional, locked storage room on the second floor designated for PPE. Inside, LPA observed adequate supplies of surgical masks, N95 masks, gowns, gloves, and sanitizer. Kitchen: LPA observed menus outside of the kitchen and dining room. Menus applied to typical and diabetic diets. The kitchen floors and surfaces were clean, and all food was sealed and labeled. Cleaning supplies remained by the dishwashing area and were not stored with food. The dining room contained tables with two chairs at each table. All tables were at least 6 feet apart and had hand sanitizer readily available. The dining room also had COVID-19 signs related to social distancing, cough etiquette, and masking requirements. LPA conducted exit interview and issued report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 10, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Jul 19, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident caused harm to another resident while in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Patrick Shanahan, Arrived at the facility at 8:40 am in response to the above mentioned allegation. LPA was greeted by facility staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 8:50am, LPA began touring the facility and interviewing residents and staff regarding the allegation At 9:15 am, LPA was able to speak with one of the residents (R1) in question. R1 confirmed that a fight had broke out and that R1 had struck the other resident (R2). After R1 struck R2, R2 stated that R2 was going to stab R1 and retreated to R2's room and came back out with a knife. Staff who were present at the time of the incident were interviewed at 10 am over the phone. All staff interviewed confirmed that R1 hit R2. R2 stated that R2 was going to R2's room to get a knife to stab R1. When R2 came out of the room, R2 did have a knife and staff moved R1 out of the way and were able to get the knife from R2. Continues on Lic 9099-C Substantiated All staff and residents interviewed confirmed that R2 did state that R2 was returning to the bedroom to get a knife. Staff interviewed stated that they did not believe R2 was getting a knife and were surprised when R2 came out of the room with a knife. Staff and residents also confirmed once R2 returned with the knife, staff removed R1 from danger and were able to get the knife from R2. 911 was called and the police did arrived but no charges were pressed by either resident. Based on information received by staff and residents, this allegation is deemed substantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, deficiencies cited and report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 19, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210709100024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1 · Plan of correction due date: Jul 19, 2021
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in all Facilities. Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal right: (3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the interviews with staff and residents, the Licensee did not ensure that clients are free from abuse, as R1 struck R2 which posed an immediate health and safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 19, 2021
Plan of correction: Staff immediately separated R1 and R2. R1's room has been changed to the opposite side of the facility. The police were called and reports made. POC corrected prior to visit.
70 of 158 beds were occupied at the April 1, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Canby Retirement, Corp., licensed since 2002.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2002, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 15
- Total complaints
- 8
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2002, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 8 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Ambassador Garden
Is Ambassador Garden licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Ambassador Garden licensed for?
158 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Ambassador Garden been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2002, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.
Is Ambassador Garden still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Ambassador Garden cost?
$3,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,350–$3,900. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 133 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,306 to $5,961 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 133 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Ambassador Garden take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Canby Retirement, Corp., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Northridge Hospital Medical Center is 1.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Ambassador Garden keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Ambassador Garden license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “AMBASSADOR GARDEN”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197603652. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 158 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Canby Retirement, Corp., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2002, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 15 state inspection visits since 2002, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2002, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
- 8 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2002, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 16, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,350On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,250On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,350On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County