Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Broadview Residential Care CenterLicense #191221839 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareBroadview Residential Care CenterLicense #191221839 · 535 West Broadway, Glendale, CA · (818) 246-4951Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/Glendale/Broadview Residential Care Center
Map · 535 West Broadway

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$3,400/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $2,650–$4,350 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (818) 246-4951

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

BR

Call Broadview Residential Care Center

Glendale · Licensed for 180

(818) 246-4951

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Large community · Licensed for 180 · Glendale

Broadview Residential Care Center

535 West Broadway, Glendale, CA 91204 · Licensed since 1992

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Broadview Residential Care Center

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$3,400 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $2,650–$4,350 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Languages spoken: English, Spanish and TagalogReported on Caring.com · September 9, 2026
  • Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 65 residents
  • Hospiceup to 2 residents

Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
115 AMBULATORY ONLY, 65 NON-AMB IN BDRMS 102, 104-112, 114-138 & 140-157. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Building is wheelchair accessible

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Diabetes care

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Medication management

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Level of medication service: reminders only

    Caring.com · September 9, 2026

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Broadview Residential Care Center: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,400a month to start

Likely $2,650–$4,350

From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$3,400likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,400likely $2,650–$4,350

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $2,650–$4,550
$3,400
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,250–$7,800
$5,900
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes13 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $6,100

$2,500$6,100

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

13 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,750–$5,300.

  • Atria GlendaleGlendale · 0.4 mi · Large community
    $4,595Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
  • Glen Terra Assisted LivingGlendale · 1.1 mi · Large community
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Glen Park at Glendale - Mariposa StGlendale · 1.4 mi · Large community
    $5,286Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Leisure Vale Assisted LivingGlendale · 1.5 mi · Large community
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Glen Park at Glendale - Boynton StGlendale · 1.5 mi · Large community
    $5,286Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ararat GardensGlendale · 1.8 mi · Large community
    $4,130Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Belmont Village BurbankBurbank · 3.3 mi · Large community
    $6,100Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ivy Park at BurbankBurbank · 3.8 mi · Large community
    $5,395Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
  • Kingsley ManorLos Angeles · 4.5 mi · Large community
    $3,594Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
  • Evergreen RetirementBurbank · 4.6 mi · Large community
    $2,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sparr Heights Estates Senior LivingMontrose · 4.6 mi · Large community
    $4,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Savant of Burbank WestBurbank · 4.8 mi · Large community
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Belmont Village HollywoodLos Angeles · 4.9 mi · Large community
    $4,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Rooms & the spaces they will use (11)Room types · Outdoor space · Cable or satellite TV
  • Room typesStudio · 1 Bedroom

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceGarden

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Cable or satellite TV

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasFitness and wellness facilities · Computer room · Entertainment venue

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Kitchenette in the unit

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Bath tubs

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • AmenitiesArts and Crafts Center · Piano or Organ · Game Room · Movie or Theater Room · Beautician

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Salon or barber

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (6)Dining style · Vegetarian or vegan options · Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen
  • Dining styleRestaurant style

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Places to eat on sitePrivate Dining Room

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day (6)Activity types offered · Exercise or fitness program · Trips outside the home
  • Activity types offeredTrivia Games · Educational Speakers / Life Long Learning · Cooking Club · Community Service Programs · Activities On-site · Holiday Parties · and 15 more

    Trivia Games · Educational Speakers / Life Long Learning · Cooking Club · Community Service Programs · Activities On-site · Holiday Parties · Live Musical Performances · Brain fitness / Dakim · Art Classes · Live Well Programs · Wine Tasting · Book Club · Cooking Classes · Karaoke · Happy Hour · Birthday Parties · Bridge Club · Live Dance or Theater Performances · BBQs or Picnics · Cards / Pinochle Club · Dances — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Exercise or fitness programStretching Classes · Walking Club · Wii Bowling · Qi Gong · Forever Fit · Yoga / Chair Yoga

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Intergenerational programs

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language (1)Languages spoken by caregivers
  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish · Spanish · Tagalog · Filipino

    English · Spanish · Tagalog — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

    Filipino — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved (3)Transportation costs extra · Public transit access claimed · Transport for group outings
  • Transportation costs extraReported no

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transport for group outings

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Where it is

535 West Broadway, Glendale, CA 91204Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Glendale Memorial Hospital and Health CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.4 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #191221839 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 6 of 15 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Unsubstantiated”.

20262 state visits · 2 documents

Jul 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not allowing resident to return to the facility

At 2: 15p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonia Alvizar- Ettima conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to complete an investigation and deliver findings of the above noted allegations. LPA met with Staff #1 (S1) and explained the reason for the visit. During initial visit on 11/24/25 at about 10:05a.m. LPA requested and received copies of the facility’s residents and staff rosters. At 10:30a.m. LPA and Office Supervisor conducted a physical plant inspection. Between 11:00a.m. - 1:00p.m. LPA conducted interviews with Licensee, eight (8) out of seventy-six (76) residents, staff #1-#2 (S1-S2) and asked questions relevant to the investigation. At the time of the investigation, resident#1(R1) was out of the facility. LPA request copies of resident #1 (R1) Identification information, Admission Agreement, Physician Report, Needs & Services Plan, Appraisal, Unusual Incident Reports, and other pertinent documents. Cont. on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Cont. from LIC 9099 On 07/18/26 LPA- Alvizar-Ettima reviewed Resident #1 (R1’s) records that Administrator provided. During this visit at approximately 3:30p.m., LPA Alvizar- Ettima and Staff #1 conducted a physical plan tour and did not observe any immediate health and safety issues. Facility staff indicated that Resident #1 (R1) has not returned to the facility. Staff are not allowing resident to return to the facility It was alleged that R1 was not permitted to return to the facility following hospitalization. During the investigation, the Administrator denied the allegation and stated the facility had not refused to accept R1 back. The Administrator explained that R1 was hospitalized due to medical concerns and was subsequently admitted to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) for a higher level of care. The Administrator stated the facility has maintained communication regarding R1’s status and indicated that R1’s return to the facility would depend on whether R1’s care needs could be safely met and whether the resident remained appropriate for RCFE placement. Staff interviews corroborate with the Administrator’s statement and indicate they were not aware of the facility refusing to readmit R1. Staff further stated that no written eviction notice had been issued and that R1 remained hospitalized and later admitted to a SNF due to medical needs. LPA review, R1’s facility file, including but not immitted to Admission Agreement, Physician Report, Needs & Services Plan, Appraisal, Unusual Incident Reports and other relevant records. Records reviewed did not reveal any information to support the allegation. Based on interviews and documents review there is insufficient information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health and safety issues were noted. Exit interview was conducted. Copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2026 · control 31-AS-20251118083947
Jan 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonia Alvizar-Ettima conducted an unannounced Required One (1) year inspection visit at this facility today. LPA met with Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools. At 9:30a.m. LPA and Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards, and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The facility is fire cleared for one hundred eighty (180) residents of which sixty-five (65) may be non-ambulatory and has a hospice waiver for two (02). The facility is currently occupying seventy-five (75) residents. The facility is a two (02) story building in a residential community. The 1st floor consists of the following: a lobby area, administrative offices, dining area, activities room, kitchen, garden lounge, beauty shop, game room, tea room, indoor gardens with water fountains, TV areas, outdoor gardens, and residents’ rooms. The 2nd floor consists of activity area, TV areas, library lounge, Zen room, snack room, large lounge area, and residents’ rooms. The passageways and walkways are free of hazards and free from obstruction. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 74°F. There are carbon monoxide detectors installed in the facility. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and last inspected on 05/13/2025. The fire extinguishers were observed to be fully charged and in compliance. The facility is equipped with emergency fire sprinkler system. Facility Fire drill was last conducted on 12/02/2025. There is only one entrance being utilized at the facility, all required posters were posted in the hallway. During today's visit, in addition to the physical plant inspection LPA interviewed seven (07) out of seventy-five (75) residents. Cont. on LIC 809-C Cont. from LIC 809 A tour of the physical plant was conducted, and the following was noted: Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. Food supplies was sufficient amount for two (02) days of perishable and seven (07) days of non-perishable was stored in covered containers at the appropriate temperatures. Knives and sharp objects were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Storage areas for cleaning solutions, toxics, knives, and hazardous items were secured and made inaccessible to residents. Walls, ceiling, and floor is in good repair, ample supply of dishes, cups, glasses and utensils for the current census. Dining Area: The dining area was observed to be neat, clean and in proper order. Walls, ceiling, tables, chairs and floor is in good repair. Laundry rooms: There are laundry rooms located on each floor of the building. All toxins such as laundry detergents and cleaning agents were observed to be inaccessible to the residents in laundry rooms. Medication: Medications are centrally stored in the locked medication stations located on the first floor. The medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There are multiple complete first aid kits in the facility. Bedrooms: LPA randomly selected resident’s apartments on each floor. Resident bedrooms were properly furnished with appropriate bedding and linens with sufficient lighting. Hygiene supplies for residents were observed, and hallways/passageways are lit. There were enough clean linen available in the closets. Each resident’s apartment has their own closet and restroom. Bathrooms: LPA randomly selected residents’ bathrooms on each floor. The bathrooms were observed to be clean properly supplied, functional fixtures and appropriate grab bars in showers and toilets. The hot water temperature measure range was between 110.1 – 115.1 degrees Fahrenheit within Title 22 Regulations. Towels and washcloths are not shared. Common Areas: LPA observed common areas on every floor. All furnishings are in good repair, lighting is good, walls, ceiling and floors are also in good repair. Surrounding Grounds: The front grounds of the facility are well landscaped with a waterfall with Koi fish and turtles which are enclosed. All passageways were observed to be clear from obstruction. Due to time constraints, LPA had to terminate the visit and will return on a later date to complete the Required - 1 Year inspection by reviewing medication, residents and staff records. No health and safety issues noted at the time of this visit. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026

20252 state visits · 3 documents

Oct 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is wrongfully evicting resident

At 9:30a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonia Alvizar- Ettima conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to complete an investigation and deliver findings of the above noted allegation. LPA met with Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. Initial visit was conducted on 06/04/2025 at about 2:20p.m., LPA requested and received copies of the facility resident and staff rosters. At 2:30p.m., LPA and Administrator conducted a physical plant walk-through. At approximately 2:50p.m., LPA interviewed Administrator and asked questions relevant to the investigation. LPA request copies of Resident #1 (R1) Identification Information, Admission Agreement, Physician Report, Needs and Services Plan, Rules & Regulations, Unusual Incident Reports, and other pertinent documentations. Prior to this visit on 10/17/2025 LPA Alvizar-Ettima reviewed records and prior documentation obtained during the initial visit. Unsubstantiated Cont. from LIC 9099 During this visit at 10:10a.m., LPA and Administrator conducted a physical plan tour. Between 10:35a.m. – 12:20p.m. LPA conducted additional interviews with facility staff and Resident #1 (R1). Staff is wrongfully evicting resident It was alleged that when Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) planned to discharge Resident #1 (R1) back to facility, the Administrator refused re-admission, citing that R1 was disruptive and a threat to staff. Interview conducted with the Administrator denied the allegation and stated that R1 was not evicted from the facility. The Administrator explained that R1 had been hospitalized for an extended period and is scheduled to return back today. Administrator further stated that R1 exhibited repeated behavioral concerns prior to hospitalization, including verbal outbursts toward staff and refusal of care. Administrator indicated that no eviction letter was issued because R1 was hospitalized and not residing at the facility at the time. The Administrator confirmed that R1’s belongings remained secure, and the facility would have accepted R1’s payment had they been readmitted through proper discharge coordination. Staff interviews indicated that R1 had previously displayed verbal aggression toward staff and residents. Staff denied that R1 was wrongfully evicted and stated that the facility was awaiting discharge coordination from SNF before determining if R1 could safely return. Staff confirmed no written eviction notice was issued. Records reviewed do not demonstrate that the facility initiated or executed an eviction process. During interview, R1 stated she has never threatened or acted aggressively toward anyone and denied that any eviction process was initiated. R1 further stated she has not received a written eviction notice, continues to reside at facility and paying rent accordingly. Based on interviews, observation and record reviewed, there is not sufficient information to support this allegation. Thus, this allegation is deemed to be UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health and safety issues were noted. Exit interview was conducted and copy of was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250603104620
Oct 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not allowing residents to pass away in the facility

At 9:30a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonia Alvizar- Ettima conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to complete an investigation and deliver findings of the above noted allegation. LPA met with Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. During initial visit on 10/14/2025 at 9:55a.m. LPA Alvizar-Ettima requested copies of the facility resident and staff roster. At 10:30a.m. LPA and Administrator conducted a physical plant inspection. Between 11:15a.m. - 2:55p.m. LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1 (S1), Administrator, five (5) out of seventy-eight (78) residents and asked questions relevant to the investigation. LPA request copies of Resident #1 (R1) Identification Information, Admission Agreement, Physician Report, Facility & Hospice Collaboration Plan, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, Preplacement Appraisal, Unusual Incident Reports, and other pertinent documentations. Cont. on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Cont. from LIC9099 Prior to this visit on 10/17/2025 LPA Alvizar-Ettima reviewed records and prior documentation obtained during the initial visit. During this visit at 10:10a.m., LPA and Administrator conducted a physical plan tour. Between 10:35a.m. – 12:20p.m., LPA conducted additional interviews with facility staff and three (3) residents. At the time of the investigation, resident #1 (R1) had already passed away. Staff are not allowing residents to pass away in the facility It was alleged that Administrator is not allowing Resident (R1) to pass away in the facility and instead arranges for resident to be transferred to Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) or other setting at the end of life. Interviews conducted with facility staff revealed that R1 never expressed a desire to pass away in the facility. Administrator indicated that they discussed with R1 the need for higher level of care, and R1 reportedly agreed with the plan for transfer. Staff#1(S1) indicated that R1 had become too weak to transfer independently from bed to restroom. Staff provided continuous care until the last few days, when R1 appeared increasingly weak and immobile. Resident#2 (R2) indicated that staff will temporarily assist residents with mobility. However, all residents must be able to ambulate independently as part of the facility’s admission and retention criteria. A review of R1’s Admission Agreement dated 12/12/2022 confirmed that the agreement included a clause stating that residents requiring medical care and assistance beyond the facility’s capacity must be transferred to a higher level of care. Other residents interviewed during investigation verified that they had knowledge that anyone requiring medical care and assistance beyond the facility’s capacity must be transferred to a higher level of care. Based on interviews and records reviewed, there is not sufficient information to support this allegation. Thus, this allegation is deemed to be UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health and safety issues were noted. Exit interview was conducted and copy of was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025 · control 31-AS-20251008082013
Mar 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma met with Betsy Davis for a Required One (01) Year visit. LPA explained the reason for the visit. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at around 11:00 AM and the following was noted: There is one entrance being utilized at the facility. The facility is fire cleared for one hundred eighty (180) residents of which sixty-five (65) may be non-ambulatory and has a hospice waiver for two (02). The facility is currently occupying seventy-two (72) residents. The facility has outdoor furniture with a covered shaded area for residents and visitors. The facility does not have a swimming pool/body of water. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins are locked away. Kitchen is sufficiently stocked with at least two (02) days perishable and seven (07) days non-perishable food. Frozen foods are wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Knives and sharps are observed to be inaccessible to residents. The common and dining areas are neat and clean. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 72°F. The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are centralized, hardwired, interconnected and checked quarterly for operation. Fire extinguishers are located throughout the facility, observed to be fully charged and last inspected 05/22/2024. (continued on LIC 809-C) LPA randomly selected six (06) rooms, and they were all adequately furnished with appropriate lighting system. Hallways are well lit. Residents have enough personal hygiene product provided by the licensee. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operations. The hot water temperature was measured at an average 114.5°F. Towels and washcloths are not shared. There was enough clean linen available. LPA observed medication to be inaccessible to residents. Facility maintains a complete first aid kit. No health and safety hazards noted during the visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2025

20231 state visit · 1 document

Dec 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced required one year annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Betsy Davis and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Valenzuela conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. The facility is a two-story building. Areas inspected: the front lobby, dining area, activity spaces / common lounge areas, medication room, storage/ disaster rooms, resident common restrooms, laundry room, outside gardens, residents bedrooms and kitchen area. LPA observed that the facility does not have a large body of water, small fountains were observed and were secured and fenced. All indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. There is only one entrance being utilized at the facility. LPA toured randomly selected resident bedrooms. All bedrooms were clean and furnished with required furniture. The resident's bathrooms were observed to be clean, operational and equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. Common resident restrooms were observed. The hot water temperature was tested and measured 115 degrees Fahrenheit. Smoke detectors are present throughout the facility and in resident bedrooms. Fire extinguishers were last serviced on May of 2023 . Oxygen monoxide detectors were observed to be operable. Fire alarms are hardwired throughout the facility. The kitchen was inspected. LPA observed all kitchen equipment to be clean and in working condition. LPA observed sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable foods, food menu was posted and no foods were expired. Common areas were observed clean and properly furnished. LPA observed the centrally stored medication area to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The first aid kit was complete. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 9 documents

20233 state visits · 3 documents

Sep 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not arrange a reappraisal meeting. Facility staff restrained a resident in care. Facility staff handle residents in a rough manner. Facility staff do not dispense medications according to physician's orders.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced visit for the above noted allegations. LPA met with Administrator Betsy Davis and explained the purpose of the visit. It was reported that staff did not arrange for a reappraisal meeting. To investigate this allegation on 9/14/2023 between 12:00pm and 12:30pm, staff interviews were initiated. Interviews revealed that Resident #1 (R1) had a sudden and steep decline in their health. According to staff, R1 appeared weak, had increase impulsiveness, inaudible speech, decrease attention to safety, a fall risk, an over active bladder, and an inability to self-feed. R1's family was immediately made of aware of R1's change in medical condition. Between 1:00pm and 2:00pm. LPA reviewed facility records. Records revealed that on 9/05/2023, R1 was reappraised. On 9/04/2023 R1's needs and services plan was updated and on 9/07/2023 R1's physician report was updated as well. Per physicain report it was recommended by the doctor that R1 be sent to a skilled nursing facility due to requiring a higher level of care as their condition had worsened. Unsubstantiated Based on interviews and records review, there is not sufficient information to support this allegation. Therefore, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. It was alleged that facility staff restrained a resident in care by placing chairs around their bed. To investigate this allegation on 9/14/2023 between 12:00pm and 12:30pm, staff interviews were initiated. Interviews revealed that Resident #1 (R1) was a fall risk due to a worsening of their medical condition. In order to make sure that R1 did not fall, staff were asked to check on them every fifteen minutes. In addition, one chair was placed next to the bed so that R1 could be transferred in and out of their bed. The chair was not used to restrain R1. Based on interviews there is not sufficient information to support this allegation. Thus, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. It was reported that staff handle residents in a rough manner. To investigate this allegation on 9/14/2023 between 12:00pm and 12:30pm, staff interviews were initiated. Interviews revealed that staff are cordial and helpful towards residents. Residents personal rights are respected. Between 3:00pm and 3:35pm, resident interviews were initiated. Interviews revealed that staff are kind and assist when called upon. Based on observation and interviews, there is not sufficient information to support this allegation. Therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. It was alleged that facility staff do not dispense medications according to physician's orders. Between 2:45pm and 3:00pm, R1's medical administration record (MAR) was reviewed. LPA did not note any discrepancies. Medications that were administered were initialed by the facility medical technicians. R1's MAR showed that medications were being dispensed daily. Between 3:00pm and 3:30pm, staff were interviewed. Interviews revealed that medications are being dispensed in a timely manner daily and on schedule. Between 3:00pm and 3:35pm, resident interviews were initiated. Interviews revealed that they are given their medication on time and do not report any issues. Based on records review and interviews, there is not sufficient information to support this allegation. Thus, it is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 14, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230907153007
Aug 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not allowing residents to participate in activities

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Betsy Davis and explained the reason for this visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:48 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:10 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 10:15 AM to 1:00 PM. It was alleged that the Administrator took a card game away from Resident #1 (R1) because there must be 10 players to play. LPA's interview with the administrator today at 10:15 AM revealed that she did not take away any card game from any resident but only changed the card game activity to another form of activity so more residents could participate. LPA's observation during physical plant tour at 10:00 AM revealed that the card game that was supposed to be taken by the administrator was at R1's room as it has always been per LPA's interview with the Activity Director at around 10:43 AM. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Further interview with the Activity Director also revealed that while it was scheduled on the Activity Calendar, the card game activity that R1 would like to play attracts only a few residents to participate as it did on prior weeks it was scheduled and played. Further, the card game was bought and owned by the facility but it was always R1 who would like to keep it after every game which is why it was on R1's room. LPA's interview with another staff also revealed that it was explained to R1 by the Activity Director hours prior to the allotted time for the card activity game that the card activity game will be changed to another activity to encourage more residents to participate and R1 agreed. LPA's interview with seven (7) residents or 10% of the current census revealed that seven (7) out of seven (7) residents participate in the Activity of their choosing and no staff or anyone stop them from participating nor anyone forced them to participate in any Activity that they do not like. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230811092041
Mar 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was assaulted while in care Facility staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings

On 03/21/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Troy Agard conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegation(s). LPA Agard was met by Besty Davis, Administrator. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to gather information and deliver findings for this complaint. The investigation consisted of the following: On 02/12/2023, LPA Agard conducted a 10-day visit, toured the physical plant and requested documents. LPA Agard requested the following documents: 1) staff and resident roster, 2) incident reports from the past 30 days and 3) R1’s physician report. All documents were received at the time of visit. On 03/21/2023, LPA Agard conducted interviews with residents, staff and a witness. LPA delivered findings on the same day. Cont. on 9099C Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation… Resident was assaulted while in care. It’s being alleged a resident in care was possibly drugged and raped during the night. LPA Agard interviewed 2 staff out of 29. 0 out of 2 confirmed the allegation. S1 states, R1 has presented with a recent onset of memory loss, confusion and delusions. “R1 was just diagnosed with a cognitive impairment so that is where all this is coming from. R1 complained that staff were stealing their things. I would go to the room and find the missing items. The night that resident came back from a (offsite) home visit, they completed their activities of daily living independently, forgot to put on their undergarments and alleged they had been assaulted because of this. Ultimately, R1 was not reporting correctly. R1 requested for a rape kit but the hospital denied it because they did not observe any signs or indications of rape.” During interviews with residents, LPA Agard attempted interviews with 6 out of 63 residents. 0 out of 5 confirmed the allegation. R1 was unable to be interviewed due to resident’s cognitive impairment. All residents interviewed unanimously denied the allegation. Citing only positive experiences while living at the facility. R2 states, “I love living here. So does my spouse. They love it too. The staff treat me very nice. I don’t know about that allegation. Never heard about that but could you please tell S1 that we love it here.” R3 states, “It’s absolutely wonderful here. The staff are very caring, they keep the place clean and take care of me just the way I like. I’m very fortunate to be here. I don’t know about anyone being assaulted.” LPA interviewed one witness that also denied the allegation. W1 states, “R1 was taken to the hospital and was checked by the Obstetrician Gynecologist (OBGYN) during the hospitalization. They told us there was no signs of R1 being attacked.” Regarding the allegation… Facility staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. It’s being alleged items and clothing has been stolen from a resident in care.” During interviews with staff, 0 out of 2 confirmed the allegation. S1 states, “no one was stealing from R1. They would report stuff missing, but I would find it. Many of the things they reported missing had all been there. We found so many things that were doubles and triples.” S2 states, “Many residents might say something is missing but is just misplaced and is usually in their room.” cont on 9099C During an interview with residents, 0 out of 5 confirmed the allegation. R1 was unable to be interviewed. All residents interviewed unanimously denied the allegation. R2 states, “My belongings are safe. People give me a lot of things all the time. I’ve never had anything go missing.” R3 states, “Absolutely. I never had an issue with my stuff going missing.” R5 states, “My personal belongings have always been safe. We don’t have theft issues here.” LPA interviewed one witness that also denied the allegation. W1 states, “The truth is, I know R1 always says things were disappearing, but I can tell you they lose everything. For example, R1 would say someone took their phone. Not remembering they gave their phone to me to charge. This continues even while they live with me now.” During a record review, LPA observed the following: an incident report dated 10/14/2022 stating R1 had been experiencing signs of paranoid behavior, reporting staff wanting to harm them, and steal from them. LPA reviewed a physician report dated for 12/09/2021 that identified a mild cognitive impairment in R1. On 02/05/2023, R1 was admitted to Keck Medicine of the University of Southern California for signs and symptoms of dementia and alleged assault. Resident was diagnosed with an Acute Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), confusion and delusions. Most recently, R1 had an evaluation on 03/09/2023 due to residents’ recent changes in health condition. The assessment identifies a diagnosis of moderate dementia with other behavioral disturbances, and a decline in cognition complicated by anxiety, depression and psychosis. Based on LPA’s record review and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230207091758

20224 state visits · 4 documents

Dec 27, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Ashley Calderon conducted an unannounced Annual - 1 Year Required visit to this facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with Assistant Administrator / Dennise Alonso and later with Administrator Betsy Davis who assisted with the visit. During today's visit, LPA used the infection control tool to evaluate the facility. The facility has a hospice waiver for two (2) and currently has no residents on hospice. LPA and Davis toured the entire physical plant of the facility, the facility is a two-story building. Areas toured: the front lobby, dining area, activity spaces / common lounge areas, medication room, storage/ disaster rooms, resident common restrooms, laundry room, outside gardens, five (5) residents bedrooms and kitchen area. LPA observed that the facility does not have a swimming pool or other large body of water, small fountains were observed and were secured and fenced. All indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. There is only one entrance being utilized at the facility, all required posters were posted at the entrance. Screening area is located and hand sanitizers are placed throughout the facility. All staff were observed to be wearing mask during this visit and facility had enough PPE supplies. LPA toured randomly selected resident rooms. Rooms 108, 118 were inspected on the first floor, rooms 222, 240 and 244 were inspected on the second floor. All bedrooms were furnished with required furniture. The resident's bathrooms were observed to be clean, operational and equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. Common resident restrooms were observed. One common restroom on the second floor was observed having a disinfectant bottle accessible to resident's, a deficiency was observed and cited on LIC809D . The hot water temperature was tested and measured within Title 22 Regulations guidelines, all were in measured between 110.5 - 118.9 Fahrenheit. Smoke detectors are present throughout the facility and in resident bedrooms. Fire extinguishers are fully charged and present throughout the facility, oxygen monoxides are operable, and fire alarms are wired to the Glendale Fire Department. Continuation 809-C... The kitchen was inspected. LPA observed all kitchen equipment to be clean and in working condition. LPA observed sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable foods, food menu was posted and no foods were expired. Common areas were observed clean and properly furnished. LPA observed the centrally stored medication area to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The first aid kit was observed and found to be in compliance with the Title 22 Regulations. Deficiencies were noted during this visit on LIC 809D per Title 22 Regulations. A copy of the report was provided to the administrator and appeal rights were given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 27, 2022
Nov 9, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley conducted an announced informal Teams meeting visit regarding COVID 19 recommendations and guidelines. LPA Calderon conducted the visit virtually with Administrator Besty Davis, Department of Public Health Outbreak Management Branch Representative, Alan Garcia, Brenna De Leon, and Dr. Al-Ahmad. LPA Calderon, conducted a tour of the facility with Alan Garcia, Brenna De Leon and Betsy Davis and observed the following: Entrance had thermometer, hand sanitizer and Covid-19 symptom log in book. Facility is currently following Covid-19 (infection control) recommendations. No vaccination shots / booster issues. Staff were observed wearing face masks and no staff shortages. . Residents are placed in green zone – 35 residents, yellow zones- 1 resident and red zone- 18 residents. Staff do not have direct contact with residents in the yellow and red zones, residents are independently living residents. Sufficient PPE for 60 days and PPE located outside of rooms and trash cans with lids in the rooms. Facility has appropriate Covid-19 signs throughout the facility as well as hand sanitizing stations. Kitchen uses disposable utensils, plates and cups for meals, getting delivered to yellow and red zones. Dining room area open only to green zone residents. Laundry is done by staff, wear PPE while washing residents’ clothes, each resident gets individual washing services. Recommendations from Public Health: change air filter and leave on air conditioner 24/7 to help viral partials and help with the air flow. No deficiencies were given during this visit. Exit interview was conducted with Betsy Davis and a copy of this report will be mailed to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2022
Mar 29, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are inappropriately restraining the residents while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Wong conducted an initial complaint investigation for the above allegation listed aboved. LPA met wtih the receptionist Arlene Cirera and explained the purpose of the visit. Then LPA met wtih Administrator Betsy Davis and assisted witht visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewd administrator, four staff (S1-S4) and six residents (R1-R6) and obtained resident and staff roster, resident sign in out sheet from March 11 to March 25, 2022, residetns exercise attendence sheet and outbreak line list and incident reports. The investigation revelaed of the following: Allegation "Staff are inappropriately restraining the residents while in care." LPA interviewed six residents and six out of six residents denied the allegation. They reported that they were able to go out during the pademic. They never felt the facility were inapproproately restraining them. (See LIC 9099C for continuation) Unsubstantiated The residents reported they can still go to their doctor appointments and families can come and visit them during the pandemic. LPA interviewed staff and all denied the allegation. Staff reported residents have their right to go outside of their rooms and the building if they have no symptoms with good health. Administrator reported two weeks ago, the facility had another outbreak (Norovirus) in the facility and facility consulted with the Department of Public Health and its better to lock down the facility due to the virus is very contagious as they have about 8 residents and 2 staff were getting infected. Currently the facility has been cleared from the outbreak. LPA also reviewed the resident sign in and out sheet and residents were able to go in and out from the building. LPA also reviewed the exercise class attendance sheet and residents do attend the exercise class during the time of the outbreak which is meant that resident were not locked in the room. Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, residents and record reviews, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report and appeal right was provided to the administrator Batsy Davis.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 29, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220323161606
Jan 24, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Nune Margaryan conducted an unannounced Annual - 1 Year Required visit to this facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with Assistant Administrator / Dennise Alonso and Administrator Betsy Davis who assist with the visit. During today's visit, LPA used the infection control tool to evaluate the facility. The facility is licensed for one hundred and eighty residents (180) and currently has sixty two (62) residents in care. The facility has a hospice waiver for two (2) and currently has no residents on hospice. LPA and administrator toured the facility at 10:00 am. Areas inspected included but are not limited to: the lobby, activity spaces, tea room, common areas, six (6 ) residents bedrooms -three (3) on each floor, kitchen, medication room and gardens. LPA observed that the facility does not have a swimming pool or other bodies of water. All indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. There is only one entrance being utilized at the facility, all required posters were posted at the entrance. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Sign in sheet, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks are available. LPA was screened upon entry. All staff were observed to be wearing mask during this visit. LPA toured randomly selected resident rooms. Rooms 108, 142,149 were inspected on the first floor, rooms 220, 242, 244 were inspected on the second floor. All bedrooms were furnished with required furnitures. The bathrooms were observed to be clean, operational and equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. The hot water temperature was tested and measured within Title 22 Regulations guidelines. Smoke detectors are present throughout the facility and in resident bedrooms. Fire extinguishers are present through the facility and are fully charged. The kitchen was inspected. LPA observed all kitchen equipment to be clean and in working condition. LPA observed sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable foods. Common areas were observed clean and properly furnished. LPAs observed the centrally stored medication area to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The first aid kit was observed and found to be in compliance with the Title 22 Regulations. Based on California Code of Regulations, Title 22, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. A copy of the report was provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2022

20212 state visits · 2 documents

Sep 14, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair. Resident has not been adequately hydrated resulting in dehydration. Staff continued to provide discontinued medication to the resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Sicairos conducted an subsequent unannounced complaint visit regarding the above stated allegations. LPA met with Administrator Betsy Davis and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation revealed the following: during the intial televisit conducted on 09/11/20, LPA interviewed the Administrator. LPA also requested via email copies of documents for Resident #1 (R1) such as Physician's Report, Identification and Emergency Information, Resident Appraisal, Progress Notes, MAR's for the last 3 months, and any recent Incident Reports. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility including common areas and interviewed Staff #1 - Staff #5 and Resident #1 - Resident #9. LPA also interviewed Dr. Hoang over the phone. The investigation revealed the following: in regards to the allegation "facility is in disrepair", it is alleged that the common areas in the facility do not have air conditioning and the facility will get too hot. During today's visit, LPA toured the common areas with the Administrator and observed the common area thermostats in the first floor read between 75F - 76F and 72F - 77F in the 2nd floor. (CONTINUED ON 9099C) Unsubstantiated 9 out of 9 residents interviewed indicated that they feel that the temperature in the common areas of the facility is always at a comfortable temperature. Residents interviewed also indicated that they have individual A/C units in their rooms and they are able to adjust the temperature and turn on and off the unit as they please. 5 out of 5 staff members interviewed indicated that the facility is always set at a comfortable temperature. Staff members indicated that they will assist residents with their A/C units and room temperature adjustments as necessary. LPA obtained a "Temperature Log" for R1 dated 09/03/20 - 09/11/20 monitoring R1's room temperature. Room temperature ranged from 72F - 76F. Therefore there was insufficient evidence to corroborate with this allegation. In regards to the allegation "resident has not been adequately hydrated resulting in dehydration", it is alleged that R1 was moved to the first floor closer to the nurse’s station so that they could monitor her water intake. Resident was offered to be moved downstairs, however R1's Responsible Party declined. Reporting Party is concerned that the residents are not being properly hydrated. 9 out of 9 residents interviewed indicated that the facility always has drinking water available for residents. Residents indicated staff members will pass out pitchers of waters with ice to all residents throughout the day as needed. Residents are also provided with liquids during each meal. 5 out 5 staff members interviewed indicated that residents are provided with pitchers of waters throughout the day. Residents can request as much water as they want. Staff members indicated that they will prompt and remind residents to drink fluids as they pass out meals and water. During today's visit, LPA observed staff members passing out pitchers of waters to residents. LPA obtained a "Fluid Intake Log" for R1 dated from 09/03/20 - 09/11/20 monitoring R1's water intake. Therefore there was insufficient evidence to corroborate with this allegation. In regards to the allegation "staff continued to provide discontinued medication to the resident", it is alleged that facility staff found some R1's discontinued pills after being discharged from the hospital and administered them to the resident. On 08/03/20, Clobazam was put "on hold" for R1 by Dr. Hoang. R1 was hospitalized between 08/24/20 - 08/26/20. Upon discharge from the hospital, Clobazam 10mg was listed as part of the discharge medication orders for R1. Based on Doctor's Orders received from the hospital, facility staff administered Clobazam to R1 on 08/27/20. R1 then refused the medication on 08/28/20. Around 6:30pm on 08/28/20, Administrator received Doctor's Orders from Dr. Harutunian instructing facility to discontinue use of Clobazam on R1. Facility proceeded to discontinue medication based on doctor's written orders. R1 has not been given Clobazam since the date facility received written doctor's orders to discontinue the medication. Therefore there was insufficient evidence to corroborate with this allegation. Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, residents, review of resident files and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 14, 2021 · control 28-AS-20200903103643
Sep 3, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Wong conducted a complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. LPA met with Betsy Davis, the Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During today’s visit, LPA interviewed the Administrator, one staff and obtained a copy of the staff and resident roster. LPA also interviewed the Administrator from the Broadway Manor (skilled nursing home) at 605 W. Broadway Glendale 91204 and obtained the resident roster for Broadway Manor. Based on interview and document reviewed, Resident #1 (R1) did not reside at this facility but at the Broadway Manor. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was provided to to the adminsitrator Betsy Davis Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210827123656

The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

69 of 180 beds were occupied at the July 24, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

535 W. Broadway, Inc., licensed since 1992.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 1992, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
14
Total complaints
7
Substantiated allegations
0
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 1992, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations01
Substantiated allegations02
Total complaints76

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Broadview Residential Care Center

Is Broadview Residential Care Center licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Broadview Residential Care Center licensed for?

180 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Broadview Residential Care Center been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 1992, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is Broadview Residential Care Center still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 10, 2026.

What does Broadview Residential Care Center cost?

$3,400 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,650–$4,350. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Glendale that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $5,286 a month, and the middle figure is $4,363 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Broadview Residential Care Center take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by 535 W. Broadway, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Glendale Memorial Hospital and Health Center is 1.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Broadview Residential Care Center keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Broadview Residential Care Center license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BROADVIEW RESIDENTIAL CARE CENTER”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #191221839. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 180 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to 535 W. Broadway, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1992, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 1992, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 1992, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 7 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 1992, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Glendale · 0.4 mi

    Atria Glendale

    Large community · licensed for 113

    Starting rate

    $4,595 a month to start

    Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Glendale · 0.9 mi

    Dryden Gardens

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $7,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Glendale · 0.4 mi

    Glendale Garden Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,850 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,800–$7,200

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Glendale · 0.3 mi

    My Happy Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,050 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,950–$7,450

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Glendale · 0.4 mi

    Comfort Care Assisted Living 1

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,100 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $5,000–$7,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Glendale · 0.5 mi

    Comfort Care Assisted Living Facility

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,550 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,550–$6,850

    On the state record

    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
BR

Call Broadview Residential Care Center

Glendale · Licensed for 180

(818) 246-4951

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Broadview Residential Care Center

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages