Mid-size home · El Centro
Parkside Villa Assisted Living
1685 Cypress Dr, El Centro, CA 92243Closed in state record
About this record
This page keeps the history of license #134604299. It does not describe current care or pricing at this address.
Browse homes in this areaAt a glance
- Care approvals recorded under this license
- Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · Bedridden
- State licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Home size
- 18 while this license was open
- Mid-size care home · the state license record
Care and support
These approvals belong to the closed license. They do not establish current care services at this address.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryRecorded under this license · up to 18 residents
- Dementia / memory careRecorded under this license
- Hospice careRecorded under this license · up to 8 residents
- BedriddenRecorded under this license · up to 8 residents
State licensing record · October 26, 2026. A different license at this address has its own record.
Read the state’s own wording
THE FACILITY SERVES EIGHTEEN (18) ELDERLY RESIDENTS, AGES 60 & ABOVE; ALL OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. THE FACILITY IS ALSO APPROVED TO SERVE EIGHT (8) BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS, WHO ARE TO BE HOUSED IN ROOMS #1,#2,#5 & #7. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR EIGHT (8) RESIDENTS.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Previously reported costs
This license is listed as closed. A current stay cannot be priced under this license.
Published prices are not on file for this license. Browse nearby homes to compare their reported costs.
This license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Daily life
Descriptions collected for this closed license. They do not describe current services at this address.
Daily-life descriptions are not on file for this license. See nearby homes for current listings.
Where it is
1685 Cypress Dr, El Centro, CA 92243Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- El Centro Regional Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.3 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #134604299 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 5 of 10 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 1 not transcribed yet.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Oct 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file
We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Neglect resulting in serious bodily injury.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Tiffany Holmes concluded the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. The facility is closed, reports mailed certified. Based on interviews and record reviews, the finding regarding the above allegation was determined to be substantiated. This finding means there is a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department's investigation included interviews and a review of pertinent records. It was alleged that neglect resulting in serious bodily injury occurred. On 1/25/2023, around 7:30 AM, Resident 1 (R1) suffered a fall in their room onto the hard surface floor. Staff 1 (S1) was the only caregiver at the facility at the time in care of fourteen (14) residents most of which are diagnosed with dementia and or are nonambulatory. Interviews revealed that S1 indicated that R1 understands and is capable of following instructions, however R1 usually doesn’t, and will get out of bed without assistance and fall. S1 was escorting R1s roommate to the dining room for breakfast and R1 was seated in their bed. S1 left the room with the roommate and instructed R1 to wait for their return before getting out of bed. Interviews revealed that once S1 left to go to the dining room, they heard a loud thump noise from R1’s room. Upon their return, S1 found R1 on the floor next to their bed. Substantiated Interviews revealed R1 told S1 they were okay and pled with S1 not to call paramedics. S1 evaluated R1 and did not observe any visual injuries. R1 stood up from the floor on their own and after a telephone conversation with the facility administrator, the decision was made to not call for medical aid. R1 began complaining of hip/groin pain later in the afternoon around 4:00 PM. Interviews revealed R1s Primary Care Physician was notified and an x-ray was scheduled the following day January. 26, 2023. Interviews revealed the primary doctor contacted facility staff on the morning of January. 27, 2023, after getting the x-ray results and instructed staff to immediately get R1 transported to the ER due to a right hip fracture. Interviews revealed that there is no set caregiver to resident ratio at the facility. It is unreasonable that one caregiver can adequately care and supervise 14 elderly residents whereas most of which are non-ambulatory and need individual assistance with their ADLs. It is reasonable, that if S1 had additional assistance, R1’s fall may have been avoided. Therefore, the allegation of neglect resulting in serious bodily injury is substantiated. Due to the facility’s closure, no exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22), were mailed via USPS certified mail to the last mailing address on file.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2025 · control 08-AS-20230127162148
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 17, 2025
Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care as required in Section 87608, Postural Supports. Additional staff shall be employed as necessary to perform office work, cooking, house cleaning, laundering, and maintenance of buildings, equipment and grounds. The licensing agency may require any facility to provide additional staff whenever it determines through documentation that the needs of the particular residents, the extent of services provided, or the physical arrangements of the facility require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not ensure facility personnel (S1) was competent to provide the services necessary to meet the needs of 1 of 14 residents which posed an immediate safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2025
Plan of correction: FACILITY IS CLOSED
Jun 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Licensee InitiatedReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Licensee Initiated
Licensing Program Analyst, David Roman (LPA D. Roman) conducted an unannounced case management visit to process the facility's closure. LPA D. Roman gained entry upon arrival to the facility by identifying himself to and discussing the purpose of the visit with Administrator, Siklalic Garcia. LPA D. Roman had previously spoken to Licensee, Quetzali Kahnis, by phone and advised the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA D. Roman along with facility staff conducted a tour inside and outside of the facility. LPA D. Roman inspected each room and observed the facility to be vacant. The home is empty of resident property however, some household furnishings are present (table, chairs, couches, books, and nightstands). On May 21, 2025, the Licensee notified the Department of the facility’s closure process. At the time of notification, the facility had a census of 12 residents. The residents were relocated to their sister facilities, Majestic and Sunset Villa. Licensee had previously advised POA’s of plans to relocate residents. No deficiencies were issued during this visit and the facility is ready for closure. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Siklalic Garcia, and with Licensee, Quetzali Kahnis via phone. Licensee was not present in person to sign this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025
Mar 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Boyles made an unannounced visit to conduct the required One-Year Inspection. LPA was granted entry into the facility by Evelyn Ramirez, House Manager, after identifying herself and stating the purpose of the inspection. The facility serves 18 elderly residents, age 60 and above, all whom may be non-ambulatory. During today’s visit, LPA performed a welfare check on all residents in care, interviewed facility staff, and reviewed records of residents and staff. LPA, accompanied by House Manager, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected all common areas and client bedrooms. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, active fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. The facility had a pool on the premises which had a locked fence in good repair and is designed to surround the pool and may not be removed. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Per the Licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Fire detection system, carbon monoxide detector, night lights, and facility telephone were all working. The facility’s fire extinguisher was serviced within the last twelve (12) months. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA reviewed multiple staff records/files and interviewed staff and residents. The interviews did not raise any immediate health and safety concerns. The reviewed files contained all required documents. LPA also conducted a review of In-service training procedures. [Continued on 809-C] [Continued from 809] According to House Manager food supply is cooked and delivered from another facility for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. LPA observed an adequate two-day supply of perishable and seven-day supply of nonperishable food items. Based on today’s inspection, no deficiencies were observed or cited. A final exit interview and a copy of this report were provided to Evelyn Ramirez, House Manager, whose signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Feb 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers, made an unannounced visit to conduct the required One-Year Inspection. LPA Rodgers were granted entry into the facility Siklalic Garcia, care giver , after identifying herself and stating the purpose of the inspection. The facility serves 18 elderly residents, age 60 and above, all whom may be non-ambulatory. . LPA was accompanied by House Manger Angelicia Quintero , for a tour of the facility which was conducted inside and out and included a sample of resident units, the dining area and recreation rooms. Exterior and interior passageways were free from obstructions. Pendants (call buttons) are present at the facility. Resident and facility room temperatures were within a comfortable range. Each resident had clean and sufficient bed linens, towels, and washcloths. All residents’ rooms were equipped with required furnishings. Lighting was present in the bedrooms. Residents’ bathrooms were observed to be sanitary and operational. Toilets and showers were equipped with grab bars Food menus and activities schedule were posted. Chemicals and cleaning supplies were stored in a locked closet. The medications were locked and medications were labeled and kept in compliance with label instructions. LPA interview confirmed the licensee provides assistance in meeting medical and dental needs. LPA reviewed multiple staff records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained all required documents. LPA also conducted a review of In-service training procedures. [Continued on 809-C] [Continued from 809] According to the House manager food supply is cooked and delivered from another facility for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. LPA observed a few small containers of ready to eat food in the refrigerator and fresh fruit on counters however, facility has did not have two-day supply of perishable and a seven-day supply of nonperishable food items. After LPA review of multiple staff residents licensee did not obtain and keep on file documentation of a medical assessment for some residents in care. During a tour of the facility LPA observed water tap temperature. Bathroom tap temperature was not complaint but was adjusted while LPA was present. Based on today’s inspection, deficiencies were observed at this time in the areas evaluated. These deficiencies are listed on the attached LIC 809-D, and cited in accordance to the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. A final exit interview and a copy of this report, Licensee/Appeal Rights - LIC 9058 (rev. 01/16), 809-d's, and were provided to , Siklalic Garcia, care giver. whose signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents
20231 state visit · 2 documents
Aug 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings. LPA was allowed entry by the Siklalic Garcia, Manager. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit and shared findings with the Manager. On July 29,2020 a complaint was received regarding the alleged incident that staff did not see timely medical care for resident. On July 24, 2020 the Licensee (LC) called Veteran's Affair (VA) via tele-health (scheduled) for Resident (R1). During the call, Licensee explained "violent" behavior to Attending Physician (AP1) to increase medication, respiradone, to "control" R1's behavior. Continued on 9099C Substantiated AP1 advised that antipsychotic medications require medical evaluation "to rule out a medical problem, such as UTI or urinary retention." AP1 explained to licensee that UTI and urinary retention contribute to increased behaviors. Per AP1's interview and medical notes, licensee stated to AP1 on July 24, 2020 that R1 had hit a nurse and an incident report was submitted to CCLD (unknown date). No such incident report was submitted to CCLD. AP1 ordered the resident to be seen on July 24, 2020 but the client was not brought to the VA to be evaluated. This was corroborated by interviews with AP1 and Licensee. On July 27, 2020 R1 was brought into to be seen and AP1 determined that R1 was retaining 600 cc of urine even though the resident was able to release some urine. According to AP1, anything more than 100 cc of urine is urinary retention and requires additional medical attention. AP1 ordered the Licensee to bring R1 to the ER with a recommendation of a bladder scan for the urinary retention and insertion of a foley catheter. In the interim, to rule out untreated UTI, per medical procedure according to the VA's Licensed Medical Social Worker, AP1, and AP2, that antibiotics were prescribed. AP2 during an interview on August 14, 2020, stated that the benefits of prescribing antibiotics for the UTI far outweighs untreated UTI. Any side effects from the antibiotics would not be as significant as an untreated UTI and that it would be overseen by the physician. Medical records: Resident complained of suprapubic pain for one week. This was noted by AP1 in the VA report. July 28, 2020 Licensee was asked to come back into the office because the VA found out that they had an ultrasound machine, as well as, lab results for the urinary analysis. Lab results returned negative for a UTI but that R1 still had 600 cc of urine. AP1 ordered that the resident be taken to the ER that night. Per Licensee's interview, the resident refused to be brought to the hospital for a foley catheter, therefore, Licensee did not take R1 to the hospital. On July 29, 2020 Resident was brought to the ER for a foley catheter insertion. During interview on August 18, 2020 with the Licensee denied that a physical or violent incident occurred. Licensee denied there was an incident that occurred regarding resident hitting staff. AP1 suspected that Licensee was lying to manipulate AP1 into ordering a medication increase. Based on LPA's interview with the Licensee, Licensee was inconsistent regarding the physical incident that R1 apparently hit a nurse. Licensee admitted that he "presented symptoms to the doctor to see what we can get for R1" to address the behaviors." Continued on 9099C August 5,2020 R1 was seen by AP2 at the VA and an infection was ruled out, aka, not a UTI. The medical assessment was that the "it was behavioral" because the white blood cells were not elevated, only lung congestion (which is consistent with diagnosed CHF). On August 6, 2020 R1 was sent back to the hospital for pulling out the Foley catheter. Per Licensee, urologist advised that catheter is no longer needed but that the resident will continue to be evaluated. August 10, 2020 El Centro Medical ER visit - at 1853, patient is retaining 215 mL of urine; On August 14, 2020 AP2 referred to a psychiatric/geriatric physician to be seen on September 21, 2020 to determine suitability of placement or whether resident requires a higher level of care. Based on the evidence, interviews conducted, and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Licensee ignored doctor's orders to bring R1 into the VA clinic on July 24, 2020 to rule out a medical problem after tele-health consultation. After in-person visit, Licensee ignored doctor's orders for catheter insertion and did not bring the resident to the ER post-visit. R1 expressed to the physician that R1 was experiencing pain for the past week. "Change me, change me," which was expressed by R1 prior to doctor's visits, Licensee dismissed it as a dry diaper and ignored any continence issues. Interview with AP1 and medical notes indicate that the urinary retention could be from untreated prostate cancer. Hence, AP1 ordered an emergency room visit. Licensee, based on a non-medical background, did not feel like the catheter was necessary because R1 was able to void, even though the ultrasound indicated that the resident was retaining 600cc of urine. Licensee did not bring R1 to the ER on July 29, 2020 after a follow-up examination for catheter insertion. An exit interview was conducted with Sikalalic Garcia, Manager. A copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to the Administrator and her signature on this report confirms receipt of the Licensee Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2023 · control 08-AS-20200729131655
Aug 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff chemically restrain resident Resident sustained unexplained injury while in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings. LPA was allowed entry by Sikalalic, Manager. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit and shared findings with the Manager. On July 29, 2020 a complaint was received regarding the alleged incidents that staff chemically restrain resident; resident sustained unexplained injury while in care. Resident's medication was not changed. LPA unable to verify the medication count at this time. MAR indicate that the medication was given as prescribed. There was no increase in dosages. VA did not order additional medication based on reconciliation documented on VA notes. Continued on 9099C Amended report.2 Unsubstantiated Resident sustained unexplained injury while in care Licensee was not at facility at the time of the follow-up call on August 18, 2020. Unable to conduct interviews with staff. Currently no indication of a fall or injury at this time. Medical assessment record shows that resident was a fall risk. Based on the review of documentation, the allegations of: Staff chemically restrain resident and Resident sustained unexplained injury while in care is Unsubstantiated due to a lack of conclusive evidence. A finding that is unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Sikalalic Garcia, Manager . A copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to the Administrator and her signature on this report confirms receipt of the Licensee Rights. Amended Reportthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2023 · control 08-AS-20200729131655
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 12, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Miller, Community Health Nurse II Corina De Leon, Liason Infection Preventionist Hosniyeh Bagheri, Infection Preventionist Hilary Metcalf, Infection Preventionist Assistant Cinthya Coronado with Imperial County Public Health Department's Healthcare Associated Infection (HAI) Program conducted an on-site visit. LPA and nurse identified themselves and discussed the purpose of the visit with Siklalic "Laly" Garcia, House Manager. The Department conducted the on-site visit to provide technical assistance and to evaluate the facility's disinfection, testing surveillance, screening protocols as well as the use of personal protective equipment. During today's visit, House Manager were interviewed and a walk-though of the facility was conducted. A debriefing was conducted with Administrator at the conclusion of the visit. During today's visit, no deficiencies were issued. An exit interview was conducted with the House Manager and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC9058 01/16), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 12, 2022
Mar 25, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced annual required licensing inspection. LPA was granted entry after identifying herself and disclosing the purpose of the visit by House Manager Siklalic Garcia. An overall tour of the facility was conducted inside and out. The inspection included, but was not limited to, verifying compliance with statutes, regulations and other written requirements that are most relevant to protecting the health of residents in care and staff, including in the area of infection control practices. LPA reviewed the facility’s Plan for Epidemic Outbreak Specific to COVID-19 Mitigation Plan Report (LIC 808) with Siklalic including the following sections: Person in Care, Staff, Visitors, Facilities without COVID-19, Residents, Facility Plans for Infection Control and Physical Distancing. LPA assessed the strategies that the facility is employing for the prevention, containment and mitigation of COVID-19, implementation of infection control guidance, staff retention and essential health and safety. LPA observed one central entry point for universal entry screening; routine symptom screening initiated at entry for staff, residents and visitors; a sign-in policy enacted for all visitors; signs were provided to be posted at facility entrance with the facility’s visitor policy and signs throughout the facility to promote hand hygiene, cough/sneeze etiquette and physical distancing; face coverings worn by staff and encouraged for residents; hand sanitizer/hand washing stations readily available; a designated visitation area; emergency agencies’ contact information posted in a location visible to staff and residents; and an adequate supply of PPE. The facility is in compliance with and has implemented infection control practices as outlined in its LIC 808. Based on today’s inspection, no deficiencies were observed. An exit interview was conducted with Siklalic. A copy of this report, along with the Licensee Rights (9058 01/16) was emailed to Director Kevin Kahnis. An electronic response confirms the receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Aug 4, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Alexandre Vo, conducted an announced Pre-Licensing visit regarding the application for Change of Capacity. LPA met with Licensee, Kevin Kahnis, and Administrator, Quetzalli Kahnis, and was allowed entry into the facility after identifying himself and stating the purpose of the visit. Facility currently serves fifteen (15) elderly residents and request to increase the capacity to eighteen (18) elderly residents, ages 60 and above. This facility houses nine (9) bedrooms and four (4) bathrooms for residents' use. The Fire Clearance was approved on July 26, 2021 for ten (10) non-ambulatory residents and eight (8) bedridden residents who are to be housed in rooms number one (1), two (2), five (5), and seven (7). Facility has an approved hospice waiver for one (1). Facility serves residents diagnosed with dementia. Facility has two (2) kitchen staff and four (4) caregivers on shift during the visit. A tour of the facility was conducted inside and out. LPA was accompanied by Licensee, Kevin Kahnis, and Administrator, Quetzalli Kahnis during the inspection. According to the Licensee, the facility does not keep firearms, ammunition, or dangerous items on the property. The pool is fenced, has a self-closing latch, and is inaccessible to residents. There is a locked centralized storage area for medication and for confidential residents and staff files. The facility is clean and in good repair. Smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors are operational. The facility has a call pendant for residents and plan to obtain pendants for each resident upon capacity increase approval. Facility’s temperature was set at 78 degrees Fahrenheit. Hot water temperatures were measured at 110, 114, and 120 degrees Fahrenheit at faucets for residents’ use. There is appropriate furnishings including lighting, hygiene products, beds, storage capacity, clean linens in good repair. Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. There are non-slip materials on rugs. Bathrooms are equipped with grab bars, non-skid mats, and showers, sinks, and toilets are operational. Chemicals and cleaning solutions are inaccessible to residents and are stored separate from the food supply. There is a seven-day supply of non-perishable food items, and a two-day supply of perishable food items. There is a shaded outdoor activities area. First aid and emergency supplies are present. Auditory devices are in place to monitor exits. Residents' special health care needs were reviewed. Required postings were observed to be placed in prominent areas, which include emergency exit plan, Resident’s Council, resident’s rights, facility’s visitation policy, the Department’s complaint poster, theft and loss policy, and information for the Long-Term Care Ombudsman. The certified administrator’s certificate is current through July 24, 2022. Surveillance cameras are in use in common areas and are reflected in the Facility Sketch, Plan of Operation, and residents’ admission agreement. The Plan of Operation was reviewed with the Licensee and Administrator. The facility has a designated activities director. Component III was waived. No deficiencies were observed during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted. The Licensee was informed that the report will be forwarded to management for approval. A copy of this report and Licensee’s Rights (9058 01/16) were provided to the Licensee by electronic mail. An e-mail confirmation receipt was requested.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2021
0 of 18 beds were occupied at the July 17, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
Held this license
Amazing Grace for You LLC, license first issued in 2020.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2020, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 7
- Total complaints
- 2
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2020, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 2 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Parkside Villa Assisted Living
Is Parkside Villa Assisted Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Closed, Licensee Initiated,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Parkside Villa Assisted Living licensed for?
18 residents while this license was open — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Parkside Villa Assisted Living been cited?
1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.
Is Parkside Villa Assisted Living still open?
This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
What does Parkside Villa Assisted Living cost?
This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Parkside Villa Assisted Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license was held by Amazing Grace for You LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
El Centro Regional Medical Center is 0.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Parkside Villa Assisted Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is on this closed license’s record, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Parkside Villa Assisted Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “PARKSIDE VILLA ASSISTED LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #134604299. The state lists this license as “Closed, Licensee Initiated,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- This license covered 18 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- This license was held by Amazing Grace for You LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 7 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 16, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Imperial County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Typical starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Typical in Imperial County · likely $3,500–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Typical in Imperial County · likely $3,500–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Typical in Imperial County · likely $3,500–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Typical in Imperial County · likely $3,500–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Typical in Imperial County · likely $3,500–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Imperial County