Alder Bay Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Eureka, Humboldt County, California — state license #126801871, with a licensed capacity of 49, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 29 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated February 3, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

16 homes in view

Alder Bay Assisted Living

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 49 residents · Eureka, CA · Humboldt County
Closed in state recordWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #126801871, held since 2006 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1355 Myrtle · Eureka, Humboldt County
Phone
(707) 444-8000
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 34 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 5 residents
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
10 AMBULATORY, 34 NON-AMBULATORY AND 5 BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 38 times and filed 29 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 3, 2026.

Most recent state visit
February 3, 2026
Occupancy at the November 18, 2024 visit
22 of 49 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 15 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 4, 2022 to November 18, 2024. 15 of the 15 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (9), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 15 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 15 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 13 of 29 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Feb 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure facility/resident's restrooms are clean and sanitized.

At approximately 11:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Sara Anderson, interviewed staff and residents. Based on interviews conducted, facility housekeeper unexpectedly quit on 10/02/2024. Facility was without housekeeping services for approximately 3 weeks. During this time, housekeeping was conducted by caregivers as they found time. Based on interviews conducted, when a staff was informed of a cleaning need, they responded immediately. LPA was informed a housekeeper has been hired and cleaning is back on schedule. During the course of this investigtion, LPA observed facility bathrooms and common areas were clean and in good repair. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241011132703
Aug 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents needs are not being met Residents not receiving timely medical care

At approximately 11:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Sara Anderson and reviewed records. LPA received copies of documents. Based on a review of records and interviews conducted, LPA did not find evidence that residents needs were not being met. Resident, R1, fell while in their room and staff responded quickly. Emergency personnel (EMT's) were notified and took R1 to the hospital. Facility provided R1's emergency paperwork to the EMT's at that time. It was later noticed the face sheet of the paperwork was missing Allergen information, but the information was included on the physician report, which was also provided. All of R1's diagnosis were listed correctly on the face sheet. Based on interviews conducted, Staff observed a change of condition that became noticable over the course of a few days. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240709165029
Aug 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow admission agreement

At approximately 11:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Sara Anderson and reviewed records. LPA received copies of documents. Based on a review of records and interviews conducted, facility issued a notice to all residents regarding a change to the way the payments are received. The date given in the notice for the change was incorrect. The date in the notice only provided 30 days until the change took effect. Administrator re-issued the notice with the correct date, to provide residents the full 60 day notice. LPA reviewed the current Admission agreement. There were no rate changes made to the admission agreement. There are no references made regarding the method of payment. The facility has the ability to make changes to the program design, provided they provide at least a 60 day notice to residents. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240812164151
Jul 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not address a change in resident's condition Staff retained a resident that requires a higher level of care

At approximately 11:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Sara Anderson, interviewed staff and reviewed records. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, facility did observe a change in residents condition and notified resident physician. Facility updates resident care plans quarterly, or as needed, and provides them to caregivers for review. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, facility was communicating with resident physician regarding changes in condition and to develop a plan to ensure their needs were met. Care plan was updated as needed. Resident ultimately moved to a higher level of care. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240118133728
Jan 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations12typical 1
Substantiated complaints16typical 2
Total complaints13typical 7
State visits on file38typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2006.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202533020245602023771202211138
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Humboldt County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Alder Bay Assisted Living licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Alder Bay Assisted Living in Eureka (Humboldt County), California license #126801871, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 49 residents. State records list 29 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated February 3, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Alder Bay Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Alder Bay Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record10 AMBULATORY, 34 NON-AMBULATORY AND 5 BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5.

How much does Alder Bay Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Alder Bay Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Humboldt County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Alder Bay Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Alder Bay Assisted Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

22 of 49 beds occupied (45%) when the state visited on November 18, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Alder Bay Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 38 state visits and 29 dated documents since 2022 for Alder Bay Assisted Living; 15 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 18, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

15 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure facility/resident's restrooms are clean and sanitized.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 11:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Sara Anderson, interviewed staff and residents. Based on interviews conducted, facility housekeeper unexpectedly quit on 10/02/2024. Facility was without housekeeping services for approximately 3 weeks. During this time, housekeeping was conducted by caregivers as they found time. Based on interviews conducted, when a staff was informed of a cleaning need, they responded immediately. LPA was informed a housekeeper has been hired and cleaning is back on schedule. During the course of this investigtion, LPA observed facility bathrooms and common areas were clean and in good repair. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 18, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241011132703
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents needs are not being met Residents not receiving timely medical care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 11:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Sara Anderson and reviewed records. LPA received copies of documents. Based on a review of records and interviews conducted, LPA did not find evidence that residents needs were not being met. Resident, R1, fell while in their room and staff responded quickly. Emergency personnel (EMT's) were notified and took R1 to the hospital. Facility provided R1's emergency paperwork to the EMT's at that time. It was later noticed the face sheet of the paperwork was missing Allergen information, but the information was included on the physician report, which was also provided. All of R1's diagnosis were listed correctly on the face sheet. Based on interviews conducted, Staff observed a change of condition that became noticable over the course of a few days. Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 19, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240709165029
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow admission agreement
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 11:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Sara Anderson and reviewed records. LPA received copies of documents. Based on a review of records and interviews conducted, facility issued a notice to all residents regarding a change to the way the payments are received. The date given in the notice for the change was incorrect. The date in the notice only provided 30 days until the change took effect. Administrator re-issued the notice with the correct date, to provide residents the full 60 day notice. LPA reviewed the current Admission agreement. There were no rate changes made to the admission agreement. There are no references made regarding the method of payment. The facility has the ability to make changes to the program design, provided they provide at least a 60 day notice to residents. Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 19, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240812164151
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not address a change in resident's condition Staff retained a resident that requires a higher level of care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 11:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Sara Anderson, interviewed staff and reviewed records. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, facility did observe a change in residents condition and notified resident physician. Facility updates resident care plans quarterly, or as needed, and provides them to caregivers for review. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, facility was communicating with resident physician regarding changes in condition and to develop a plan to ensure their needs were met. Care plan was updated as needed. Resident ultimately moved to a higher level of care. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 15, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240118133728

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are not being provided adequate food service
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Sara Anderson, interviewed residents and reviewed records. Based on interviews conducted, food service for the evening meal has been a common concern with residents. The staff responsible for preparing the evening meal served residents food that was not at the proper temperature and did not provide proper amounts. LPA discussed this issue with the Director and was informed the staff responsible has been terminated. After several attempts to correct the situation, S1 refused to conform to the proper techniques for serving meals. The Director has several job postings advertised for a replacement and has rearranged kitchen staff to ensure meals are served in the appropriate manner. Based on the Departments investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the abCDSS inspection report, April 20, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230405092217
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has inadequate staffing to meet resident's needs. Staff does not answer facility phone. Staff does not ensure resident's laundry needs are being met. Staff does not provide activities for resident's in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 11:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Sara Anderson, interviewed residents and reviewed records. LPA was not able to find supporting evidence that the needs of the residents are not being met due to inadequate staffing. LPA reviewed staffing schedules and found facility had staff scheduled to meet the residents needs. LPA reviewed "resident call for assistance logs" and found the average response time for staff to respond was 7 minutes. The facility has a business office manager that answers the telephone during business hours. If a person were to call after hours or on weekends, the calls are answered by the medication technician, if available, or the call will go to voicemail. The business office manager checks for messages when they return to the office the next business day. LPA reviewed the facility laundry scheduleCDSS inspection report, April 10, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230324084346

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not properly trained.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 11:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Sara Anderson, reviewed records and interviewed staff. LPA reviewed staff training records and found a lack of required annual training. Executive Director has implemented a training plan to ensure staff receive the required hours of training. Based on the Departments investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. This report was reviewed with Executive Director and Appeal rights were given. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 20, 2022 · control 21-AS-20221122121315
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing adequate food services to residents. Staff are not meeting resident's showering needs. Staff are not providing scheduled activities for residents. Staff are not providing laundry service to residents.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Sara Anderson, reviewed records and interviewed staff. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the facility did not provide adequate food services to residents, see complaint 21-AS-20221018160309. Facility is in the process of hiring additional kitchen staff and equipment to ensure residents receive quality food service. Based on interviews conducted, residents are not consistently receiving showers due to a lack of staff. LPA reviewed documentation that showed some residents refused showers while others were not showered due to time or lack of staff. LPA observed there has only been weekly bingo as an activity for several months. Facility is in the process of hiring a designated activities director. Based on interviews conducted, facility was without housekeeping staff and housekeCDSS inspection report, December 1, 2022 · control 21-AS-20221031122319
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair. Facility is unsanitary. Food services are inadequate.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to deliver findings to an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Dale Woytek, toured the facility, reviewed records and intereviewed staff and residents. LPA toured the kitchen and inspected equipment. The stove/oven/griddle combination was not in good repair. LPA was informed and observed a crack in the grease tray section of the griddle that has already caused several fires. The last fire caused the grease tray to melt and now it is not removeable. Two of Three ovens are non operational. Facility does not have an area to keep food warm while serving residents, resulting in cold to partially warm food being served to residents. LPA inspected the warming station and found large, rusted holes in the base where water would be. The ventilation unit above the stove was in need of degreasing and cleaning. Unit was not being used during this visit. TCDSS inspection report, November 15, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220930122431
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to meet residents care needs Facility not providing adequate meal service
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 11:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to deliver findings to an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Dale Woytek, toured the facility, reviewed records and intereviewed staff and residents. Based on interviews conducted and LPA observation, care staff did not meet the needs of residents on at least two occasions. During a visit on 11/07/2022, LPA witnessed staff not provide shower assistance due to not having enough staff on duty at the time. LPA inquired if this situation occurred often and was told that it was not a daily issue, but did happen often. LPA observed meal service on several occasions during this investigation. LPA observed the meal during the morning and afternoon was served in a timely manner. During the evening meals, LPA was informed that food served to residents is luke warm or cold, due to the lack of a warming station and lack of space in the kitchen to prepCDSS inspection report, November 15, 2022 · control 21-AS-20221018160309
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff financially abusing resident. Facility failed to safeguard resident's property.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 10:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to deliver findings to an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Dale Woytek, toured the facility, reviewed records and intereviewed staff and residents. Based on interviews conducted, staff did not financially abuse a resident. Based on interviews conducted, the encounters where S1 received money from residents were all consenual and residents freely gave money to S1. S1 also received money from various staff. There were no incidents of threats or bullying to get money. Based on interviews conducted, the personal property that was taken by S1 was given as a gift from a resident. S1 was terminated for violating facility policy. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 15, 2022 · control 21-AS-20221004173642
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide resident's with a comfortable temperature.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 11:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Business Office Manager Kim Gibbs, toured the building, interviewed residents and staff and reviewed records. LPA measured the air temperature on each floor of the building. Temperatures ranged from 61-68 degrees in the hallways. LPA measured the temperature in a sampling of resident rooms. Temperatures ranged from 62-69 degrees. LPA spoke with residents and was informed they were provided individual space heaters for their rooms until the heating system was repaired. LPA was informed by Tod Murray, a corporate representive, the repairs were in process and the contractor was scheduled to be on site 11/08/2022 to correct the issue. Based on the Departments investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are cited from thCDSS inspection report, November 7, 2022 · control 21-AS-20221031122319
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not fingerprint cleared and/or associated.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 10:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Daly Woytek, toured the facility, reviewed records and interviewed staff and residents. LPA reviewed staff schedules and compaired them to the background clearance records for the facility. Based on this record review, LPA observed S1 and S2, currently working at the facility, did not have a background clearance. LPA observed S3 and S4, no longer employed at the facility, had worked at the facility without a background clearance. A civil penalty is being issued in the amount of $2000. Based on the Departments investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or beforeCDSS inspection report, October 6, 2022 · control 21-AS-20221004173642
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not being properly trained Facility is in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility, unannounced, to complete an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Dale Woytek, toured the building, interviewed staff and reviewed records. During the course of this investigation, LPA reviewed staff training records and interviewed staff regarding the training they received. LPA was informed that the training consisted mostly of watching a video and shadowing another staff, then they would work on their own after approximately 2-3 days. LPA was provided documentation of staff training hours for 10 staff. Of the 10 staff, only 1 out of 10 had the required annual 20 hours of training. LPA toured the facility on 08/04, 08/11 and 8/24/2022. LPA observed carpets in need of cleaning and a door in the hallway that was broken. LPA was informed by Dale that new doors are in the process of being ordered. It is a challenge in this area due to the lack of availabiliCDSS inspection report, September 16, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220805163150
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnqualified Administrator working at facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 10:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility, unannounced, to open an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Tiffany Blake and reviewed documents. Tiffany told LPA she submitted the administrator application on 10/20/2021. Then again, after taking and passing the Administrator test. Tiffany told LPA that her payment was returned due to it being the wrong amount. A new check, for the proper amount, was sent, which was also returned, due to the date being past the 30 day time frame from taking the test. Although it appears there was some miscommunication between Tiffany and the Administrator certification unit, no application was received, therefore no Administrator certificate was issued. LPA discussed the steps that need to be taken to correct this issue. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ieCDSS inspection report, August 4, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220802120803

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 38 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
12
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
16
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
13
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
38
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 444-8000
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Alder Bay Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.