Renaissance At Timber Ridge is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Eureka, Humboldt County, California — state license #125000592, licensed for 22 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 9 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated January 20, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Renaissance At Timber Ridge

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 22 residents · Eureka, CA · Humboldt County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #125000592, held since 1998 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2780 Timber Ridge Lane · Eureka, Humboldt County
Phone
(707) 443-3000
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 20 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
20 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS.State service designation981 - RCFE / DELAYEDthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 9 times and filed 9 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on January 20, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
January 20, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
20 of 22 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 3, 2023 to January 20, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (4). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 6 of 9 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 2 documents
Jan 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide resident assistance with obtaining medical and dental care. Staff failed to assist residents with transportation needs. Staff did not ensure residents’ beds were in good condition. Staff do not assist residents in a timely manner. Staff do not ensure the facility is free of odor.

At approximately 11:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Larona Farnum, interviewed staff and reviewed records. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, facility has assisted with obtaining medical and dental care for residents. LPA reviewed the appointment book and observed multiple scheduled appointments. LPA reviewed facilities transportation records and observed facility has scheduled days of the week to transport residents to medical and dental appointments. When a resident needs a different day, the facility works with the resident to find an alternative mode of transport. Based on interviews conducted and an inspection of residents beds, LPA did not find evidence to support the allegation that residents beds were not in good condition. LPA reviewed the facility call log records. LPA observed response times averaged approximately 3the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2026 · control 21-AS-20251215121957
Jan 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident soiled in urine. Staff not properly trained to care for residents. Personal rights

At approximately 11:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Larona Farnum, interviewed staff and reviewed records. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, Resident, R1, did not require assistance with continence care. Staff interviewed informed LPA that R1 would use the restroom on their own. LPA reviewed staff training records and observed staff have the required initial and annual training to work with residents with Dementia. LPA spoke with Executive Director regarding the facility policy on contacting law enforcement. Director informed LPA that if a resident becomes aggressive and assaults other residents or staff, and staff feel the situation is beyond their control, staff will contact emergency services. Director stated she has not had to contact law enforcement often because her staff are well trained in caring for dementia residentthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260115151742
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to arrange for medical care

At approximately 1:00PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Larona Farnum and reviewed records. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, Resident, R1, was at a scheduled medical visit when they were informed the physician was out unexpectedly. The physician office staff suggested R1 be seen at the emergency room, ER, or return later to the Urgent Care. Due to lack of available staff and wait times in the ER, facility staff did not take R1 to ER and returned later with R1 to be seen at the Urgent Care. Urgent care staff told R1's escort there were too many people waiting to be seen and they would not be able to see R1 that day. Licensee contacted Hospice the following day for a consult and R1 was admitted to Hospice. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did othe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250612142910
Aug 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Oct 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints4typical 7
State visits on file9typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1998.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202612020252202024110202322020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Humboldt County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 443-3000

Is Renaissance At Timber Ridge licensed?

Yes — Renaissance At Timber Ridge is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Eureka (Humboldt County): California license #125000592, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 22 residents. State records list 9 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated January 20, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Renaissance At Timber Ridge care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Renaissance At Timber Ridge with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record20 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS.

How much does Renaissance At Timber Ridge cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Renaissance At Timber Ridge's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Humboldt County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Renaissance At Timber Ridge accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Renaissance At Timber Ridge is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

20 of 22 beds occupied (91%) when the state visited on January 20, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Renaissance At Timber Ridge?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 9 state visits and 9 dated documents since 2021 for Renaissance At Timber Ridge; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated January 20, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide resident assistance with obtaining medical and dental care. Staff failed to assist residents with transportation needs. Staff did not ensure residents’ beds were in good condition. Staff do not assist residents in a timely manner. Staff do not ensure the facility is free of odor.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 11:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Larona Farnum, interviewed staff and reviewed records. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, facility has assisted with obtaining medical and dental care for residents. LPA reviewed the appointment book and observed multiple scheduled appointments. LPA reviewed facilities transportation records and observed facility has scheduled days of the week to transport residents to medical and dental appointments. When a resident needs a different day, the facility works with the resident to find an alternative mode of transport. Based on interviews conducted and an inspection of residents beds, LPA did not find evidence to support the allegation that residents beds were not in good condition. LPA reviewed the facility call log records. LPA observed response times averaged approximately 3CDSS inspection report, January 20, 2026 · control 21-AS-20251215121957
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident soiled in urine. Staff not properly trained to care for residents. Personal rights
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 11:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Larona Farnum, interviewed staff and reviewed records. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, Resident, R1, did not require assistance with continence care. Staff interviewed informed LPA that R1 would use the restroom on their own. LPA reviewed staff training records and observed staff have the required initial and annual training to work with residents with Dementia. LPA spoke with Executive Director regarding the facility policy on contacting law enforcement. Director informed LPA that if a resident becomes aggressive and assaults other residents or staff, and staff feel the situation is beyond their control, staff will contact emergency services. Director stated she has not had to contact law enforcement often because her staff are well trained in caring for dementia residentCDSS inspection report, January 20, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260115151742

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to arrange for medical care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 1:00PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Larona Farnum and reviewed records. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, Resident, R1, was at a scheduled medical visit when they were informed the physician was out unexpectedly. The physician office staff suggested R1 be seen at the emergency room, ER, or return later to the Urgent Care. Due to lack of available staff and wait times in the ER, facility staff did not take R1 to ER and returned later with R1 to be seen at the Urgent Care. Urgent care staff told R1's escort there were too many people waiting to be seen and they would not be able to see R1 that day. Licensee contacted Hospice the following day for a consult and R1 was admitted to Hospice. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did oCDSS inspection report, September 9, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250612142910

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedAdministration did not prevent staff from physically abusing resident in care. Staff are not properly trained to administer resident's medications. Staff are not keeping record of resident's medication log. Staff leave resident's soiled for an extended period of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 2:45PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to deliver results from an investigaiton into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Larona Farnum, toured the building and reviewed records. LPA reviewed incident reports from 2022 and 2023 and found no incidents of staff abusing residents or causing harm. LPA reviewed medication technician training records and found all medication technicians have the required training. LPA reviewed medication administration records for memory care and observed all medications were accounted for. LPA interviewed staff on medication practices and staff displayed a good knowledge of facility procedures. LPA received copies of training records. The building was toured on 07/20/2023 and during this visit. Continued on LIC9099-C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 3, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230712112128

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 9 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
9
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Renaissance At Timber Ridge?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Western Living Concepts, who operates 3 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 443-3000
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Renaissance At Timber Ridge? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.