Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Wyngate Villa Gardens

Large community·Licensed for 68·Tujunga, California

Licensed since 2021Licence #197610099
  • Care approvals on fileHospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,750 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,700–$6,000
  • Home sizeLicensed for 68Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit52 of 68 beds occupiedJuly 17, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 19, 2026CDSS inspection record

Wyngate Villa Gardens is a large care community in Tujunga — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 68 residents since 2021. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care and dementia care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Wyngate Villa Gardens

Is Wyngate Villa Gardens licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Wyngate Villa Gardens licensed for?

68 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Wyngate Villa Gardens been cited?

2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 26 state visits over the same years.

Is Wyngate Villa Gardens still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Wyngate Villa Gardens cost?

$4,750 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,700–$6,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 121 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,094 to $5,961 a month, and the middle figure is $4,195 (n = 121 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Wyngate Villa Gardens take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by All Health Operations, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Can Wyngate Villa Gardens keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Wyngate Villa Gardens license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “WYNGATE VILLA GARDENS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197610099. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 68 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to All Health Operations, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 26 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 26 state visits in that period.
  • 17 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 19, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 10 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 10 residents

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (46) AMBULATORY. APPROVED FOR (22) NON-AMNULATORY, OF WHICH (10) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ALL BEDROOMS IN BUILDING 2 ARE CLEARED FOR BEDRIDDEN. ALL OTHER BEDROOMS IN OTHER BUILDINGS ARE FOR AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (10).

935 - ELDERLY · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,750a month to start

Likely $3,700–$6,000

From 19 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,750a month

Likely $3,700–$6,150

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,750likely $3,700–$6,000

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,700–$6,150
$4,750
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,450–$9,200
$6,750
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

19 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,500–$5,950.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 19 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7634 Wyngate Street, Tujunga, CA 91042Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 27 documents for this home, and its records count 26 visits since 2021. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 19, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
26
Most recent visit
August 19, 2026
Occupied · July 17, 2026 visit
52 of 68 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 20 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 15, 2021 to July 17, 2026. 20 of the 20 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (19). 20 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 20 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations2typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 2
  • Total complaints17typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202655020253402024440202366120224402021440

The last 36 months — 14 of 27 documents

20265 state visits · 5 documents
Aug 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced case management visit to this facility to follow up on the Fire Safety Order received by CCL on 08/12/26. LPA met with Licensee Representative Nieva Ruiz and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 10:06 AM and requested copies of facility documents relevant to the purpose of the visit. LPA also interviewed the Licensee Representative and Fire Inspector. LPA observed that the physical plant part of the Fire Safety Order were cleared by the facility. LPA's interview with the Licensee Representative revealed that they have already applied for the renewal for the Permit at the LAFD. Fire Inspection as required was done on 08/13/26. There is no health and safety issues observed during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2026
Jul 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was not allowed to communicate with POA/friend by phone. Resident did not have an access to the SSI check. Resident wrongfully was placed on hospice

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA met with the Business Office Manager (BOM), Nieva Ruiz and explained the reason for the visit. The administrator, Alma Epinal, was advised over the phone. The initial visit to this complaint was made on 01/29/26. During today’s visit LPA conducted a tour of the facility between 10:30am and 11:30am, interviewed administrator and two (2) staff between 11:30am to 12:30pm and interviewed ten 10) residents between 12:30pm and 1:30pm. LPA also reviewed and requested copies of the following documents (between 1:30pm to 2:30pm): Resident 1’s (R1) Information Sheet, R1’s Admission Agreement, R1’s Identification and Emergency Contact Information, Consent Forms, Appraisals, and Physician’s Report. Regarding allegation: Resident was not allowed to communicate with POA/friend by phone, it was reported that facility staff isolated R1 and prevented R1 from reaching out to their POA/friend, often turning off Unsubstantiated R1's cell phone. R1 no longer resides at the facility. The reporting party is unable to confirm if this allegation occurred at this facility, or the most recent facility where R1 is now. Interview with administrator and staff deny the allegation stating R1 had their own personal cell phone, and would call their friend or family, or have their friend or family visit them at least twice per week. LPA was able to obtain R1's contact information and made contact with R1, who stated this allegation is towards current location where R1 is at. R1 had no issues while residing at Wyngate, but opted to move into a community more related to R1's ethnicity. R1 confirmed they were able to use their personal cell phone to communicate with their friend or POA. In addition to interviewing R1, LPA interviewed ten residents, of which the majority had no complaints or issues with making contact with their friends and family. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove that Resident was not allowed to communicate with POA/friend by phone. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding allegation: Resident did not have an access to their SSI check, it was reported that From October 2023 through January 2025, R1 was at two different Board & Care facilities and R1 never saw their Social Security checks. Interviews with administrator and staff deny the allegation, stating R1 managed their own finances during their stay at this facility. R1's Security Check was mailed to them during their stay here, and R1 made their monthly payments on time. Rent was $1420 a month. Interview with R1 confirm that they manage their own finances and their Social Security check was received during their stay at facility. LPA also interviewed ten residents, of which the majority had no issues with receiving their mail or Social Security checks. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove that R1 did not have an access to their SSI check. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding allegation: Resident wrongfully was placed on hospice, it was reported that R1 was placed fraudulently under hospice care. Interviews with administrator and staff deny R1 being on hospice or being placed on hospice while at facility. Interview with R1 also confirm that they are not receiving hospice care. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove that R1 was wrongfully placed on hospice. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260122141516
Jun 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have hot water Facility is in disrepair Staff does not provide adequate care to prevent resident falls

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA initially met staff Jaqueline Montoya who called the Administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. Mr. Chavez is indisposed at this time. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:31 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:00 AM, reviewed documents between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that the Facility does not have hot water, LPA's observation during visit on 01/13 26, hot water temperature at building # 1 measured at 107.2°F, building #2 at 114.6°F, building #3 at 118.1°F, building #4 at 112.5°F and building #5 at 111.3°F. During today's visit, hot water temperature at building # 1 measured at 106.7°F, building #2 at 113.0°F, building #3 at 116.2°F, building #4 at 118.8°F and building #5 at 108.2°F. All were within the required range. LPA's interview with five (5) residents today or 10% of the current census revealed that five (5) out of five (5) residents interviewed stated that they always have hot water in their building. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that Facility is in disrepair, it was alleged that overhead roof falling and electricity attached to it in an illegal and/or hazardous way, LPA's observation on prior and today's visit revealed that the facility's bathroom and kitchen are generally clean and in good repair, no machine or equipment was observed to be broken or in disrepair. Further, the roof and ceiling on each building were observed to be intact and in good repair, LPA did not observe any exposed electrical wire anywhere in the facility. LPA's interview with the maintenance manager on 01/13/26 at 12:45 PM revealed that the only exposed wire was telephone wire which was no longer in use which was covered immediately. Regarding the allegation that Staff does not provide adequate care to prevent resident falls, LPA records review today between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM revealed that there was no resident who fell at the facility in 2025 up to May of 2026. LPA's interview with five (5) residents today or 10% of the current census revealed that five (5) out of five (5) residents interviewed stated that the facility has enough staff to care for them. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, these allegation are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 2, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260106085440
Jan 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents have grooming supplies. Staff are mismanaging residents' mail.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Co-Administrator Alma Espinal and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:43 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:18 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:30 AM and 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff do not ensure residents have grooming supplies, it was alleged that toiletries were not provided for residents both men and women. LPA's observation during visit revealed that the facility has sufficient stock of toiletries from shampoo, razors and shaving cream, bath soap, toothpaste, etc. LPA's interview with five (5) residents or 10% of the current census between 10:30 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that five (5) out of five (5) residents both male and female get their toiletries supplies regularly and were not refused when they ask the staff for toiletries. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation Staff are mismanaging residents' mail. It was alleged that social security cards and state identification cards were missing when checks were expected via mail route. LPA's interview with the Administrator and staff between 10:30 AM to 12:30 PM, revealed that they distribute on the same day regularly during dinner time at the dining area and for non-ambulatory residents, the medication technician brings the mail during medication pass. Further interview with the Administrator also revealed that there was no missing mail reported to the office for the last two (2) years. LPA's interview with five (5) residents or 10% of the current census between 10:30 AM to 12:30 PM, revealed that five (5) out of five (5) residents stated that they get their mail regularly and did not have any mail missing. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026 · control 31-AS-20250905101430
Jan 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced Required One (1) year visit at this facility today. LPA initially met with staff Ricardo Rodriguez who called the administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The co Administrator Alma Espinal arrived twenty (20) minutes later. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:25 AM and the following was noted: The facility consists of five (5) buildings, each house has one main entrance. The facility had submitted and approved Mitigation Plan and Infection Plan on file.. The facility has sufficient stock of PPE in the storage room. The facility has five (5) buildings with a total of (34) shared bedrooms. Each building has their own bathrooms ranging from one (1) at building #3 up to five (5) on building #2. The facility is fire cleared for bedridden in building #2 only. Approved hospice for ten (10) residents. Common areas were inspected. All buildings has its own living room. Activity room is located on building #4 and dining area is located on building #2. Dining area was observed to be neat, clean and in proper order. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 74°F. There are carbon monoxide detector installed in the facility. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and last inspected on 06/20/25. The facility is equipped with emergency pull alarm and sprinkler system. (continued to LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 809) Laundry room is located adjacent to the kitchen and was observed to be locked. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins are stored in a locked cabinet in the laundry room inaccessible to the residents. Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days of perishable and seven (7) days of non-perishable food. Knives and sharp objects were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The residents' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hallways/passage ways are lit. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed that there are appropriate grab bars in the showers and toilets. The hot water temperature at building # 1 measured at 129.2°F, building #2 at 134.4°F, building #3 at 118.8°F, building #4 at 145.0°F and building #5 at 108.3°F. There were enough clean linen available in the closets. Medications were kept in a locked medication carts in the medication room. The medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Medications were reviewed and inventoried, medication count did not tally with the record. There are multiple complete first aid kits located in the medication room. Facility emergency disaster plan was reviewed. Facility disaster drill was last conducted on 11/10/25. A fire alarm inspection by the LAFD was last performed on 09/23/24 with validity until 03/31/27. There is no body of water in the facility. Back and front yard passageways were observed to be clear from obstruction. There is a shaded area on each building for the residents. In addition to the physical plant inspection, residents and staff records were reviewed, LPA reviewed files of five (5) randomly selected residents. Residents files appear to be complete and updated. Five (5) staff files were also reviewed, staff files appear to be complete and updated. Citation issued. Appeal rights discussed and given. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2026
20253 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has mold/fungus. Staff do not ensure that facility is free of pests.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:10 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:48 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:00 AM to 12:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that the facility has mold/fungus, it was alleged that the bathrooms have mold, fungus, bugs, and dirty towels. LPA's observation during physical plant tour today revealed that all the bathrooms and toilets in buildings 1,2,3,4 & 5 were clean and did not observe anything that may look like fungus and mold in any of the bathrooms. Further, LPA did not see any towels in any of the bathroom. LPA's interview with the administrator revealed that all the toilets are being cleaned every day and re-stocked with toilet paper. LPA's interview with two (2) housekeepers today confirmed that they clean all the toilets on all buildings every day. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that Staff do not ensure that facility is free of pests, it was alleged that the bathrooms have bugs. LPA's observation during physical plant tour today revealed that all the bathrooms and toilets in buildings 1,2,3,4 & 5 were free of bugs and pests. LPA's record review today also revealed that the facility has a contracted pest control company that visits monthly to ensure that there is no infestation at the facility. LPA's interview with five (5) residents or 10% of the current census revealed that five (5) out of five (5) residents did not see any bugs or pests in their bathroom at any time. Based on the information gathered during this visit, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250905101430

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Aug 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide a safe environment for resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:08 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:32 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:00 AM to 12:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff do not provide a safe environment for resident in care, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was choked by Resident #2 (R2) after R1 refused to be intimate with R2. LPA's interview with R1 on 05/20/25 at 11:15 AM, revealed that the incident happened at the parking area at around 7:30 AM while they were waiting for transportation going to the Day Program. Further interview also revealed that R1 had a relationship with R2 and tried to break up with R2 during that incident. (continued to LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA's interview with R2 today at 11:33 AM, however, revealed that R1 asked R2 to massage R1 at the back so R2 did but denied choking R1 in any way because it was only massaging R1's nape and not R1's throat. LPA's interview with the Administrator today at 10:30 AM and Assistant Administrator on 05/20/25 revealed that when R1 reported to them the incident R1 stated that the incident happened in R1's room and when they interview R2, R2 denied choking R1. LPA's interview with both R1 & R2 confirmed that there was no one else present in the parking area when the incident occurred. LPA's record review on 05/20/25 also revealed that there was no camera installed at the parking area so there was no record of the alleged choking incident. LPA's interview with two (2) residents that are both living in the same building as R1 and rooms were adjacent to R1 revealed that they did not witness R2 being rough to R1 and coming to R1's room during early morning hours. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250514160241
Mar 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that resident's belongings are safeguarded

On 03/17/2025 at 10:00 am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lorena Casillas conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above stated allegation. LPA was greeted by staff who allowed entry and called Administrator Oscar Chavez, to meet with LPA. Administrator arrived shortly after, and LPA explained the reason for the visit. An entrance interview was conducted. From 10:30 am to 2:00 pm LPA toured the facility with Administrator, interviewed residents and staff, and reviewed facility files. The facility has five (5) buildings with a total of (34) shared bedrooms. The facility is fire cleared for forty six (46) ambulatory and twenty two (22) non-ambulatory residents, ten (10) of which maybe bedridden in building #2 only. LPA requested copies of resident roster, LIC 500, Liability Insurance and Administrator Certificate. LPA requested copies of pertinent information relevant to the investigation including but not limited to admission agreements, resident property inventory sheet, resident medical records, and any information pertaining to residents in care. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff do not ensure that resident's belongings are safeguarded. It is alleged that staff do not ensure that resident's belongings are safeguarded. Regarding this allegation it is reported that Resident #1 (R1)’s room was broken into and R1’s tablet was broken. Interview with Administrator revealed that R1 did report to staff that the tablet was broken on 03/14/25 however Administrator stated that R1 has a tendency of damaging property and accusing others of stealing but when staff investigate, belongings are left forgotten in common areas by R1 and property that is damaged is caused by R1. Interview with two (2) out of two (2) staff assigned to R1’s building revealed that R1 did not directly report anything to them however staff did express that they are aware of R1’s tablet incident. Staff stated R1 has a tendency of making false allegations due to R1’s mental state, furthermore staff revealed that R1 has the ability to lock the room and does so every day, therefore no other residents would have access to R1’s room. Interview with ten (10) out of (10) residents revealed that they have never had issues with their property being stolen or damaged and that staff make sure that their belongings are safeguarded by being vigilant about residents staying out of other residents’ rooms. LPA reviewed resident records and found a property inventory sheet for R1 that did not reflect a tablet. LPA also reviewed the facility admission agreement that reflects that residents agree that they will self-report and update their own property inventory sheet and that they are responsible for their own belongings. LPA did not find a tablet on R1’s inventory sheet but Administrator did confirm that R1 has a broken tablet. Furthermore, Administrator states that they looked over video footage for 03/14/25 when incident was reported to staff and there was no observation of anyone other than R1 entering and/or leaving R1’s room. Footage is only recorded for seven (7) days and as of today’s date anything outside of seven (7) days is not available. LPA interviewed R1 and R1 states that they do not know how the tablet was broken as they did not witness anyone breaking it, R1 just suspects that it was broken by someone else but cannot state who or when. Therefore, based on observations, file reviews and interviews this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. Report signed by designee Ricardo Rodriguez as Administrator had to leave before LPA was able to deliver report. No citation issued. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250312131151
Mar 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 03/17/25 LPA Casillas arrived at facility above to conduct an initial 10-day complaint investigation for complaint # 31-AS-20250312131151. This Case Management is not related to the original complaint visit. During the facility tour LPA observed that cleaning supply cart was left unattended for an extended period of time. This allowed residents to have access to cleaning supplies. LPA asked staff why it was left unattended and staff replied that the cleaning staff was performing another duty. LPA asked staff to please call cleaning staff to return to cart and put away the supplies until they are able to supervise them appropriately. LPA waited for cleaning staff member to return and take charge of cart. LPA explained to Administrator the importance of ensuring that harmful products are not left unattended if outside the locked storage area. LPA explained to Administrator that a citation would be issued for this deficiency. LPA also advised Administrator that there needs to be a training of all staff on the importance of keeping harmful items locked for resident safety. Administrator will email LPA a copy of the training that was provided along with a log of all staff that was in attendance by end of POC date. Report signed by designee Ricardo Rodriguez as Administrator had to leave before LPA was able to deliver report. Citation Issued. Appeal rights discussed and provided. Exit Interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 24, 2025

87309(a)Storage Space and Access ...the licensee shall ensure that disinfectants, cleaning solutions…and other similar items ....are in locked storage and are not left unattended if outside the locked storage. This was not met as evidenced by: Based observation, staff do not ensure that cleaning supplies were inaccessible to residents in care, this poses a potential health and safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2025

Plan of correction: Supply cart with cleaning supplies was put away in LPA’s presence. Administrator will email LPA a copy of the training that was provided along with a log of all staff that was in attendance by end of POC date.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced Required One (1) year visit at this facility today. LPA initially met with staff Vanessa Rodriguez who called the administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The Assistant Administrator Alma Espinal arrived thirty (30) minutes later. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:35 AM and the following was noted: The facility consists of five (5) buildings, each house has one main entrance. There are required posters posted at each main door and all over the facility. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Sign in sheet and hand sanitizer is available. All the staff were observed to be wearing mask. The facility had an approved Mitigation Plan. Signs to wear a mask and other COVID-19 prevention protocol signs were posted outside the door. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, physical distancing and other necessary signs were posted in the bathroom and all over the facility. The facility has multiple screening stations all through out the facility. The facility has sufficient stock of PPE in the storage room. The facility has five (5) buildings with a total of (34) shared bedrooms. Each building has their own bathrooms ranging from one (1) at building #3 up to five (5) on building #2. The facility is fire cleared for forty six (46) ambulatory and twenty two (22) non-ambulatory residents, ten (10) of which maybe bedridden in building #2 only. Approved hospice for ten (10) residents. Common areas were inspected. All buildings has its own living room. Activity room is located on building #4 and dining area is located on building #2. Dining area was observed to be neat, clean and in proper order. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 74°F. There are carbon monoxide detector installed in the facility. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and last inspected on 04/04/24. The facility is equipped with emergency pull alarm and sprinkler system. (continued to LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 809) Laundry room is located adjacent to the kitchen and was observed to be locked. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins are stored in a locked cabinet in the laundry room inaccessible to the residents. Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days of perishable and seven (7) days of non-perishable food. Knives and sharp objects were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The residents' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hallways/passage ways are lit. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed that there are appropriate grab bars in the showers and toilets. The hot water temperature at building # 1 measured at 118.9°F, building #2 at 126.5°F, building #3 at 113.9°F, building #4 at 130.5°F and building #5 at 119.5°F. There were enough clean linen available in the closets. Medications were kept in a locked medication carts in the medication room. The medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There are multiple complete first aid kits located in the medication room. Facility emergency disaster plan was reviewed. Facility disaster drill was last conducted on 10/18/24. A fire alarm inspection by the LAFD was last performed on 09/23/24 with validity until 03/31/27. There is no body of water in the facility. Back and front yard passageways were observed to be clear from obstruction. There is a shaded area on each building for the residents. In addition to the physical plant inspection, residents and staff records were reviewed, LPA reviewed files of five (5) randomly selected residents. Residents files appear to be complete and updated. Six (6) staff files were also reviewed, staff files appear to be complete and updated. Citation issued. Appeal rights discussed and given. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2024
Apr 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is charging residents to take a shower Staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time Staff did not administer medications to residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:35 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:02 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:30 AM to 12:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff is charging residents to take a shower, it was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) charges residents to give showers. LPA's interview with six (6) residents who needs shower assistance on 08/24/23 between 11:00 AM to 1:45 PM and additional three (3) residents who also needs shower assistance on 01/11/24 between 10:34 AM to 1:00 revealed that nine (9) out of nine (9) residents interviewed denied paying S1 or any of the staff for their showers. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA's interview with S1 on 08/24/23 at 11:34 AM revealed that S1 never asked any residents for payment when assisting them with their showers nor witnessed or have knowledge of any staff charges any resident to give them showers. LPA's interview with the administrator today at 12:00 PM also revealed that he did not receive any report of S1 or any staff of charging any resident for showers. Regarding the allegation that Staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time, it was alleged that residents (no particular resident was identified on the complaint) are left with soiled diapers for four (4) to five (5) hours. LPA's interview with three (3) incontinent residents on 08/24/23 between 11:00 AM to 1:45 PM, one (1) incontinent resident on 01/11/24 between 10:34 AM to 1:00 and three (3) additional incontinent residents today between 10:30 AM to 12:30 PM revealed that all seven (7) incontinent residents interviewed stated that staff always change their diapers on time three (3) to four (4) times a day and staff always come within reasonable time or within (15) minutes or less when they push their call button. Regarding the allegation that Staff did not administer medications to residents, it was alleged that S1 did not give residents their medication. LPA's interview with the administrator today at 12:00 PM revealed S1 or any caregiver do not administer medication to any resident, only the medication technician. LPA's interview with S1 today at 12:30 PM revealed that S1 never once administer or provided any medication to any resident at any time. LPA's interview with six (6) residents today between 10:30 AM to 12:30 PM. revealed that six (6) out of six (6) residents interviewed confirmed that S1 did not administer or gave them any medication at any time. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visits, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230818155055
Jan 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced Required One (1) year visit at this facility today. LPA initially met with staff Vanessa Rodriguez who called the administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator Oscar Chavez arrived fifteen (15) minutes later. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:25 AM and the following was noted: The facility consists of five (5) buildings, each house has one main entrance. There are required posters posted at each main door and all over the facility. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Sign in sheet and hand sanitizer is available. All the staff were observed to be wearing mask. The facility had an approved Mitigation Plan. Signs to wear a mask and other COVID-19 prevention protocol signs were posted outside the door. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, physical distancing and other necessary signs were posted in the bathroom and all over the facility. The facility has multiple screening stations all through out the facility. The facility has sufficient stock of PPE in the storage room. The facility has five (5) buildings with a total of (34) shared bedrooms. Each building has their own bathrooms ranging from one at building #3 up to five (5) on building #2. The facility is fire cleared for forty six (46) ambulatory and twenty two (22) non-ambulatory residents, ten (10) of which maybe bedridden in building #2 only. Approved hospice for ten (10) residents. Common areas were inspected. All buildings has its own living room. Activity room is located on building #4 and dining area is located on building #2. Dining area was observed to be neat, clean and in proper order. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 74°F. There are carbon monoxide detector installed in the facility. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and last inspected on 04/07/23. The facility is equipped with emergency pull alarm and sprinkler system. (continued to LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 809) Laundry room is located adjacent to the kitchen and was observed to be locked. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins are stored in a locked cabinet in the laundry room inaccessible to the residents. Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days of perishable and seven (7) days of non-perishable food. Knives and sharp objects were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The residents' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hallways/passage ways are lit. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed that there are appropriate grab bars in the showers and toilets. The hot water temperature at building # 1 measured at 106.6°F, building #2 at 112.6°F, building #3 at 119.2°F, building #4 at 116.9°F and building #5 at 115.8°F. There were enough clean linen available in the closets. Medications were kept in a locked medication carts in the medication room. The medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There are multiple complete first aid kits located in the medication room. Facility emergency disaster plan was reviewed. Facility disaster drill was last conducted on 01/19/24. A fire inspection by the LAFD was last performed on 07/27/22 with validity until 03/31/24. There is no body of water in the facility. Back and front yard passageways were observed to be clear from obstruction. There is a shaded area on each building for the residents. In addition to the physical plant inspection, residents and staff records were reviewed, LPA reviewed files of five (5) randomly selected residents. Residents files appear to be complete and updated. Six (6) staff files were also reviewed, staff files appear to be complete and updated. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2024
Jan 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents are allowed to smoke inside the facility Staff shower resident with only cold water

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:44 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:02 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 10:34 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Residents are allowed to smoke inside the facility, it was alleged that some residents smoke inside the facility especially residents in room #9. LPA physical plant tour on prior visit on 08/24/23 at 9:18 AM and today at 9:44 AM revealed that no traces of cigarette smell was observed inside the facility especially surrounding Room #9. LPA's interview with six (6) residents on 08/24/23 between 11:00 AM to 1:45 PM and four (4) residents today between 10:34 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that ten (10) out of ten (10) residents interviewed did not smoke or witnessed anyone smoking inside the facility. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that Staff shower resident with only cold water, it was alleged that a resident is showered with cold water all the time. LPA's interview with six (6) residents on 08/24/23 between 11:00 AM to 1:45 PM and four (4) residents today between 10:34 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that eight (8) out of ten (10) residents interviewed were assisted by the staff to shower and eight (8) out of eight (8) residents interviewed were showered with warm water. The two (2) residents who did not need assistance showering also revealed that they always shower with warm water. Ten (10) out of ten (10) residents interviewed confirmed that the facility always has hot water. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 11, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230818111812
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent a resident from hitting another resident while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:38 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:02 AM and interviewed staff and residents and witness between 10:10 AM to 1:00 PM. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was punched by Resident #2 (R2) in the shoulder. LPA's record review today at 10:15 AM revealed that both R1 and R2 are independent and attending Adult Health Day Center (ADHC) in Canoga Park. LPA's interview with the administrator today at 10:10 AM revealed that it was reported to him by R1 that the incident happened at the ADHC when R1 and R2 were doing activity in the ADHC and when R1 tried to assist R2 in the game, R2 allegedly hit R1. LPA's interview with the staff of ADHC today at 12:35 PM revealed that the staff did not witness any physical or verbal altercation between R1 and R2 at any time while in the day program. (continued to LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Further interview with the ADHC staff also revealed that no staff and/or client witnessed the alleged incident either per the staff's investigation. LPA's interview with another resident which is a common friend of both R1 & R2 confirmed the story of the administrator that the incident did not happen at the facility and also revealed that R1 & R2 had an ongoing relationship. Further interview with the administrator also revealed that there was no reported incident wherein R2 had any physical or verbal altercation with R1 at any time while in the facility. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2023 · control 31-AS-20231002164728
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  4. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County