Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

The Varsity Manor

Small home·Licensed for 6·Ventura, California

Licensed since 2022Licence #565850294
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,700 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,800
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit3 of 6 beds occupiedApril 8, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 17, 2026CDSS inspection record

The Varsity Manor is a small care home in Ventura — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2022.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about The Varsity Manor

Is The Varsity Manor licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is The Varsity Manor licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has The Varsity Manor been cited?

1 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is The Varsity Manor still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does The Varsity Manor cost?

$4,700 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,850–$5,800. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Ventura that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,428 to $7,475 a month, and the middle figure is $3,750 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does The Varsity Manor take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Ventura Care Services LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Ventura County Medical Center is 1.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can The Varsity Manor keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

The Varsity Manor license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “VARSITY MANOR, THE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #565850294. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Ventura Care Services LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 4 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ROOMS 3 AND 4 APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,700a month to start

Likely $3,850–$5,800

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,700a month

Likely $3,850–$6,000

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,700likely $3,850–$5,800

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,850–$6,000
$4,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,500–$9,100
$6,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,250–$7,550.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 4656 Varsity St, Ventura, CA 93003Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated November 19, 2025.

On file since
2022
State visits
8
Most recent visit
July 17, 2026
Occupied · April 8, 2025 visit
3 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 26, 2025 to April 8, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations3typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025341202411020231102022220

The last 36 months — 6 of 8 documents

20253 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 01:35PM. LPA initially met with facility staff. Facility Designee was contacted via telephone and arrived at the facility at 02:20PM. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 02:23PM, the LPA, along with Facility Designee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Hardwired smoke detectors were tested at 02:31PM and were functional at the time of the visit. Fire extinguisher was observed to be fully charged and last serviced on 09/15/2025. BEDROOMS: There are 5 (five) total bedrooms, of which 2 (two) are designated as private resident rooms, 2 (two) for shared resident use, and 1 (one) staff room. The LPA observed the resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. RESTROOMS: The LPA observed 2 (two) restrooms in the facility. 1 (one) is for shared use and 1 (one) is designated as a private restroom. Resident restrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and slip-resistant surfaces. Water temperature measured within the required range. COMMON SPACES: In the common areas, walls and flooring were checked for cleanliness and good condition. At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The LPA observed the required postings in the common area. A fireplace was observed to be adequately screened. Auditory exit alarms were observed on exit doors. Report Continued on LIC 809-C KITCHEN/GARAGE: Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Knives and cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and properly stored at the time of the visit. Emergency food and water was observed. Adjacent to the kitchen is a locked garage. Garage was observed and contained the laundry area, extra food, cleaning supplies and storage. There is an additional staff room in the garage area. OUTDOOR SPACE: The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture for resident use. All exits and passageways were observed to be clear of hazards. Gate was observed to be self-closing and latching. RECORD REVIEW: Beginning at 01:43PM, staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, and personal rights. Four (4) staff files and four (4) resident files were reviewed. All staff and resident files reviewed contained all required documents. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility’s infection control plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. LPA also reviewed the facility's emergency disaster plan, which was observed to be complete and updated annually, as required. Emergency drills are conducted quarterly, with the last drill documented on 11/01/2025. MEDICATION REVIEW: Beginning at 02:33PM, medications for two (2) residents were observed. Both two (2) of two (2) residents' medications were observed to be maintained and administered in compliance with regulation. INTERVIEWS: Throughout the visit, LPA interviewed staff and residents. No concerns were noted during facility interviews. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2025
Apr 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Administrator did not ensure resident’s medications were available Administrator speaks inappropriately in the presence of resident in care Resident was charged for services not agreed upon in the care assessment

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted a subsequent complaint investigation with the purpose continuing the investigation related to the above noted allegations. LPA met with Facility Designee John Davis and explained the reason for the visit. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 02/12/2025, LPA interviewed staff at 10:39AM, Facility Designee throughout the visit, and interviewed Administrator Alexander (Alex) Tecson and Facility Designee John Davis via video conference beginning at 11:09AM. LPA toured the facility at 01:04PM and interviewed 2 (two) residents during facility tour. LPA reviewed and obtained copies of documents relevant to the investigation. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed all relevant documents and telephonically interviewed additional relevant parties. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Substantiated Allegation: “Administrator did not ensure resident’s medications were available:” The complaint alleges that on 02/05/2025, medications were delivered for Resident #1 (R1), however medications were not provided to R1 nor their hospice care provider. LPA reviewed hospice plan of care, medications and medication orders for R1, as well as interviewed staff and Administrator related to this allegation. Administrator indicated R1’s outside medical provider did not inform the facility of a change in R1’s care plan. LPA reviewed R1’s hospice plan of care and confirmed these medications were not included in the care plan on file at the facility, which was dated 11/07/2023. However, interview revealed that Administrator called and spoke to R1’s family member who verbally confirmed there had been a change in R1’s plan of care, additional medications were prescribed by R1’s doctor, and the medications were authorized by R1’s family member. Interview revealed that the 2 (two) medications in question were delivered to the facility between 10:40-11:00PM on 02/05/2025. Staff signed for the medications and contacted the Administrator. Administrator instructed staff to place the medications in the refrigerator. Although the medications were not listed on the plan of care on file at the facility, facility staff still signed for the medications and centrally stored these medications per the Administrator’s instructions. Additionally, R1’s hospice nurse was present in R1’s room at the time of delivery, however facility Administrator nor staff informed R1’s hospice nurse that the medications were delivered and available to be administered. Interview revealed that at 10:00AM, a different hospice nurse arrived to take over R1’s care. This nurse requested R1’s medications and facility staff provided the medications to the hospice nurse at 10:16AM, which is almost 12 (twelve) hours after the medications had been delivered. Based on interview and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the allegation “administrator did not ensure resident’s medications were available” is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation: “Administrator speaks inappropriately in the presence of resident in care:” It was alleged that on 02/05/2025, the Administrator arrived at the facility, entered R1’s room, and was raising their voice at R1’s outside medical provider. Interview revealed that facility staff had noticed a rapid decline in R1’s health condition and facility staff had contacted the facility Administrator to inform them of this observation. Facility staff then contacted R1’s hospice care provider to inform them. Hospice staff arrived at the facility to assess R1’s changing needs and with R1/their family member’s consent, hospice staff remained at the facility to provide additional care to R1. Administrator arrived at the facility that afternoon and entered R1’s room. Interview with Administrator revealed the hospice agency had not communicated the change in Report Continued on LIC 9099-C plan of care to the Administrator and therefore, the nurse should not be present in the facility and further, Administrator needs to know who is coming to the facility and when. However, the facility’s visiting policy in R1’s signed Admission Agreement indicates facility visiting hours are from 09:00AM to 06:00PM daily and resident personal rights indicate residents have a right to visit privately without prior notice. Administrator admitted having the conversation with the hospice nurse while both parties were in R1’s room, with R1 present. Telephonic witnesses confirmed the conversation was “heated” and Administrator stated to LPA that he was upset that hospice had not informed him. Based on interview and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the allegation “Administrator speaks inappropriately in the presence of resident in care” is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation: “Resident was charged for services not agreed upon in the care assessment:” It was alleged that after R1 had fallen at the facility, the Administrator informed R1’s family that R1 required a 1:1 caregiver at an additional cost, however this was not agreed upon nor indicated in R1’s assessment. LPA reviewed R1’s admission agreement signed on 12/15/2021 when R1 moved into the facility. Admission Agreement states “if the facility rates for basic services change because the resident’s needed/desired services change, a written notice will be provided to the resident and the resident’s representative within two (2) business days of providing service at a new level of care.” However, there was no new care plan completed at that time, indicating the need for increased supervision and a change in level of care. No new Physician’s Report was filled out either, which is also required for a change in condition. Hospice plan of care dated 11/07/2023 states resident is “ambulatory: requires walker. Maximum assist,” however it does not indicate 1:1 supervision is required. Staff interviewed indicated they believe there was a verbal agreement with R1’s representative related to the additional care, as R1 had a diagnosis of dementia, had broken their leg, and needed additional supervision to remind R1 not to get up and re-injure their leg. LPA requested proof of written notice or signed new care plan following R1’s fall, however nothing in writing was provided by the licensee. R1’s representative stated they did not receive such written notice, but was charged in excess of $17,000 for additional care. Based on interview and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation above is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations and/or CA Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted. A copy of today’s reports and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250207094516

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(16) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 9, 2025

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (16) To receive or reject medical care or other services. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section as R1's medications were delivered to the facility, but were not provided to R1 nor their hospice provider informed of their arrival, which posed an immediate health risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to obtain training for all staff on resident personal rights by an outside vendor. Proof of scheduled training will be submitted to CCL by POC due date. Proof of training including roster, materials, and trainer information will be provided to CCL upon completion.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 22, 2025

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section as Administrator was upset and was having a "heated" conversation with R1's hospice nurse in front of R1, which posed a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025

Plan of correction: Facility Designee agreed to ensure Administrator sends a statement of understanding and a plan of communication with outside service providers to CCL by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(f) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 22, 2025

87507 Admission Agreements (f) The licensee shall comply with all applicable terms and conditions set forth in the admission agreement, including all modifications and attachments. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section, as R1's signed Admission Agreement nor care plan indicated the need for a 1:1 caregiver, and no new care plan was completed and agreed upon, which posed a potential personal rights risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to review the current Admission Agreement for compliance with regulation, will send to LPA for approval by POC due date.

Apr 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an unannounced Case Management - Deficiencies visit to this facility due to deficiencies observed during the investigation of complaint control # 29-AS-20250207094516. LPA met with Facility Designee John Davis and discussed the reason for the visit. Upon entry during today’s visit, LPA observed 2 (two) of the facility’s hardwired smoke detectors had been removed in the facility dining room and the facility’s living room. Facility Designee stated the smoke detectors have been removed a least 2 (two) days ago. Administrator was contacted via telephone and stated they needed new batteries and were taken off site to replace the batteries. During today’s visit, Facility Designee picked up the smoke detectors and returned them to this facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed Administrator, staff, and reviewed documents. Interview revealed that Resident #1 (R1) had fallen while in care at the facility on 04/28/2023. R1 also passed away under hospice care on 02/07/2025. LPA reviewed the Woodland Hills North Regional Office files for reports related to R1’s fall and subsequent hospitalization as well as R1’s death. LPA found that no reports have been received in the Regional Office via fax or email from this facility since the date the facility opened on 11/03/2022. LPA asked Administrator whether reports were submitted. Administrator stated he was unaware of the requirement to send incident reports to the Regional Office, however, Administrator stated he sent death reports via email. LPA asked for proof of emails sent to the Regional Office, but no such proof was provided during the investigation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations and/or CA Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted. A copy of today’s reports were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87203 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 8, 2025

87203 Fire Safety All facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not compy with the above cited section, as 2 (two) smoke detectors were removed from the facility common areas for a minimum of 2 (two) days, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025

Plan of correction: During today's visit, Facility Designee picked up the missing smoke detectors, ensured the batteries are replaced and reinstalled them in the common areas. POC cleared.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 22, 2025

87211 Reporting Requirements (a) (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days...name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section, as no incident reports nor death reports have been received at the Regional Office since the facility opened, which poses a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025

Plan of correction: The Administrator agreed to review all emails and see if/when death reports were sent to the Regional Office. If any were sent previously Administrator will provide proof to CCL by POC due date. Administrator will provide a statement of understanding related to reporting requirements, including hospice notifications to CCL by POC due date.

Feb 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handle residents in a rough manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted an initial complaint investigation visit to the facility regarding the above noted allegation. LPA initially met with a caregiver who called the administrator. Administrator Alex Tecson arrived at 11:57 a.m. and LPA explained the reason for the visit. LPA interviewed three residents starting at 12:25 p.m. LPA interviewed two staff at 11:53 a.m. and 12:22 p.m. LPA reviewed and obtained pertinent records at 12:10 p.m. LPA conducted a brief facility tour at 1:07 p.m. (continued on LIC9099-C, page 2) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC9099) Staff training records were up to date. Staff received dementia training in June of 2024 and postural support training in July 2024. Based on interviews with staff, they appear to understand how to handle fragile residents. Based on interviews with residents, they have never been handled roughly staff. Residents were happy with how staff treat them at the facility. Residents had nothing negative to say about staff or the administrator. Based on interviews and training records, the allegation staff handle residents in a rough manner is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No deficiencies were observed. Exit interview conducted and report issued to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250218091237
20241 state visit · 1 document
Nov 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 09:25AM. LPA initially met with facility staff. Facility Designee was contacted via telephone and arrived at the facility at 09:37AM. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 09:39AM, the LPA, along with Facility Designee and facility staff toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Hardwired smoke detectors were tested at 11:57AM and carbon monoxide detector was tested at 11:56AM and all were functional at the time of the visit. Fire extinguishers were observed to be fully charged and last serviced on 09/06/2024. COMMON SPACES: In the common areas, walls and flooring were checked for cleanliness and good condition. At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The LPA observed the required postings in the common area. A fireplace was observed to be adequately screened. Auditory exit alarms were observed on exit doors. KITCHEN/GARAGE: Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Knives and cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and properly stored at the time of the visit. Emergency food and water was observed. Adjacent to the kitchen is a locked garage. Garage was observed and contained the laundry area, extra food, cleaning supplies and storage. BEDROOMS: There are 5 (five) total bedrooms, of which 2 (two) are designated as private resident rooms, 2 (two) for shared resident use, and 1 (one) staff room. The LPA observed the resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Report Continued on LIC 809-C RESTROOMS: The LPA observed 2 (two) restrooms in the facility. 1 (one) is for shared use and 1 (one) is designated as a private restroom. Resident restrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. Water temperature measured within the required range. OUTDOOR SPACE: The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture for resident use. All exits and passageways were observed to be clear of hazards. Gate was observed to be self-closing and latching. RECORD REVIEW: Beginning at 09:55AM, staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, and personal rights. LPA observed full bedrails on Resident #1 (R1)'s bed and although R1 does have a physician's order for full bedrails, R1 is not on hospice nor does the facility have an approved exception on file for R1. Bedrails were replaced with half bedrails during the visit. 4 (four) staff files were reviewed. Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) did not have proof of annual medication training, however, both S1 and S2, as well as both Facility Designees stated the training has been completed within the last 12 months. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility’s infection control plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. LPA also reviewed the facility's emergency disaster plan, which was observed to be complete and updated annually, as required. Emergency drills are conducted quarterly, with the last drill documented on 09/10/2024. MEDICATION REVIEW: Beginning at 10:49AM, medications for 2 (two) residents were observed. Both 2 (two) of 2 (two) residents' medications were observed to be maintained and administered in compliance with regulation. INTERVIEWS: Throughout the visit, LPA interviewed staff and residents. No concerns were noted during facility interviews. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2024

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 12:33PM. LPA initially met with facility staff. Facility Designee was contacted via telephone and arrived at the facility at 12:53PM. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 01:08PM, the LPA, along with Facility Designee and facility staff toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Hardwired combination smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 02:47PM and were functional at the time of the visit. Fire extinguishers were observed to be fully charged and last serviced on 09/15/2023. BEDROOMS: There are 5 (five) total bedrooms, of which 2 (two) are designated as private resident rooms, 2 (two) for shared resident use, and 1 (one) staff room. The LPA observed the resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. RESTROOMS: The LPA observed 2 (two) restrooms in the facility. 1 (one) is for shared use and 1 (one) is designated as a private restroom. Resident restrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. Water temperature was measured in the shared resident restroom and measured within the required range. COMMON SPACES: In the common areas, walls and flooring were checked for cleanliness and good condition. At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The LPA observed the required postings in the common area. A fireplace was observed to be adequately screened. KITCHEN: Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of Report Continued on LIC 809-C perishable and non-perishable food. Knives and cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and properly stored at the time of the visit. Emergency food and water was observed. Adjacent to the kitchen is a locked garage. Garage was observed and contained the laundry area, extra food, cleaning supplies and storage. OUTDOOR SPACE: The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture for resident use. All exits and passageways were observed to be clear of hazards. RECORD REVIEW: Beginning at 01:25PM, staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, and personal rights. 4 (four) resident records reviewed were complete and contained all required documents. 5 (five) staff files reviewed were complete and contained all required documents. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility’s infection control plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. LPA also reviewed the facility's emergency disaster plan, which was observed to be complete and updated annually, as required. Emergency drills are conducted quarterly, with the last drill documented on 09/15/2023. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medications for 2 (two) residents were observed. Both 2 (two) of 2 (two) residents' medications were observed to be maintained and administered in compliance with regulation. INTERVIEWS: Throughout the visit, LPA interviewed 1 (one) staff and 1 (one) resident. During today's visit, LPA gathered the following items: LIC 500 A copy of the facility's liability insurance No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Room types1 Bedroom · Semi-Private

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceOutdoor Common Areas

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Roll-in / accessible shower

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasIndoor Common Areas

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Air conditioning in the room

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Meals provided

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Special diets supportedNo Sugar · Low / No Sodium

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegan · Vegetarian

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Kosher foodKosher style

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Ventura County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Ventura County