Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
The Watermark at Napa Valley
Large community·Licensed for 240·Napa, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$5,150 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,550
- Home sizeLicensed for 240Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit167 of 240 beds occupiedSeptember 30, 2025 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitJune 24, 2026CDSS inspection record
The Watermark at Napa Valley is a large care community in Napa — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 240 residents since 2025.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about The Watermark at Napa Valley
Is The Watermark at Napa Valley licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is The Watermark at Napa Valley licensed for?
240 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has The Watermark at Napa Valley been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.
Is The Watermark at Napa Valley still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does The Watermark at Napa Valley cost?
$5,150 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,550. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does The Watermark at Napa Valley take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by 4055 Solano Ave Opco LLC; Atsc II LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Atsc II LLC — at least 4 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Providence Queen of the Valley Medical Center is 1.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can The Watermark at Napa Valley keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 20 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
The Watermark at Napa Valley license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “WATERMARK AT NAPA VALLEY, THE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #286804281. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 240 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to 4055 Solano Ave Opco LLC; Atsc II LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 10 state inspection visits since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 129 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 20 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 20 residents
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 240 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 129 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 20 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,150a month to start
Likely $4,000–$6,550
From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,150a month
Likely $4,000–$6,700
With a studio and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$5,150likely $4,000–$6,550
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,700
- $5,150
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,800–$9,700
- $7,150
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
9 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,550–$4,450.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Aegis Assisted Living of NapaNapa · 0.9 mi · Large community$4,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Inn on Villa LaneNapa · 1.7 mi · Large community$3,595Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- The BerkshireNapa · 2.1 mi · Large community$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Cogir of Sonoma PlazaSonoma · 8.5 mi · Large community$4,280Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Cogir of SonomaSonoma · 8.8 mi · Large community$4,195Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at RockvilleFairfield · 12 mi · Large community$3,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Village at Rancho Solano Assisted LivingFairfield · 14 mi · Large community$4,195Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Vista PradoVallejo · 15 mi · Large community$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Cogir of North BayVallejo · 15 mi · Large community$3,250Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 4055 Solano Ave, Napa, CA 94558Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2025, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2025. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 24, 2026.
- On file since
- 2025
- State visits
- 10
- Most recent visit
- June 24, 2026
- Occupied · September 30, 2025 visit
- 167 of 240 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 30, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 1
- Substantiated allegations0typical 2
- Total complaints2typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2025.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 10 of 10 documents
Jun 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 06/24/2026, at approximately 12:45 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management - Incident inspection and met with Heidi Gallagher, Director of Nursing and William "Bryce" Groth, Maintenance Director and Designated Responsible Party. LPA is conducting a case management visit to obtain more information regarding a series of incident reports (IRs) and an SOC341 received by the Department. LPA obtained documents, made observations, and conducted interviews. On 05/13/2026, the Department received a self-reported incident report (IR) for an incident that occurred on 05/08/2026, involving Resident 1 (R1). On 05/28/2026, the Department received a SOC341 regarding an incident that occurred on 05/26/2026 involving Resident 2 (R2) where it was reported that items were taken from their room. Staff involved were ultimately terminated. On 06/09/2026, the Department received a self-reported IR regarding an elopement on 05/13/2026 of Resident 3 (R3) who per their physician's report dated 08/28/2024 is unable to leave the facility unassisted, (see LIC809D). All required parties were notified in the required time frames, R3's supervision and redirection were increased, and R3 was reassessed and was transferred to the facility's memory care unit the next day. The family ultimately moved R3 to a smaller facility due to R3's increased care needs and finances. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Designated Responsible Party and appeal of rights provided. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 24, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 25, 2026
87411(a) Personnel Requirements – General Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, self-report, and interview conducted with S1, R3 eloped from the community without staff knowledge and staff did not prevent R3 from wandering away from the facility which poses an immediate Health, Safety and/or Personal Rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 24, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee to submit self-certification that an elopement prevention training has been schduled and/or completed by POC due date of 06/25/2026.
Apr 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At approximately 10:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to conduct a required 1-year annual inspection and met with Grant Wegner, Administrator. Facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) and is approved for 240 residents and 129 of whom may be non ambulatory. Facility has independent living, assisted living, and memory care residents, with a Hospice waiver for twenty (20) and approval for twenty (20) bedridden residents. Facility has a delayed egress system in place. At approximately 11:40 AM, LPA initiated a tour of the facility with Administrator and observed the following: Facility is a three story building, with emergency evacuation chairs in place at at the top of each stairwell. Facility was a comfortable temperature, and passageways were free from obstructions. LPA observed egress devices activated and staff responded timely. Water temperatures in residents' bathrooms measured within the allowable range of 105 to 120 degrees F per Title 22 regulations. LPA observed a supply of paper products available for residents. Residents' bedrooms were inspected and observed to have all the appropriate furnishings as outlined in Title 22 regulations. Closets containing cleaning supplies and other items that could pose a risk were locked. Facility has at least two days of perishable food and one week of non-perishable foods, as well as an emergency water supply. Medications were centrally stored and locked. There are outdoor shaded seating areas and space for outdoor activities. LPA observed residents engaged in activities in common areas. Facility has internet service and an internet access device designated for resident use. Continued on LIC809-C... Continued from LIC809C... LPA observed facility's first aid kit and a supply of PPE. Fire extinguishers were observed fully charged and were last inspected 06/2025. Facility has a back up generator for emergency preparedness. At approximately 1:30 PM, LPA conducted a review of eight (8) resident files. All resident records have the required documentation per regulation. At approximately 4:30 PM, LPA and Administrator conducted a spot check of centrally stored medication and medication records which were observed stored and maintained in compliance with regulation. Facility assists with coordinating medical and dental appointments as well as transportation to and from appointments as needed. Facility does not manage P&I cash resource. Administrator Certificate for Grant Wegner: certificate number 7024855740 expires 03/10/2027. LPA will return at a later date to complete this annual inspection and will conduct a review of staff records at that time. LPA will review emergency disaster plan, emergency disaster drill log, facility's fire inspection report and obtain a copy of the facility's liability insurance. Exit interview conducted with Administrator whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2026
Mar 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 03/18/2026, at approximately 10:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to conduct a case management - incident visit and met with Grant Wegner, Administrator. LPA is conducting a case management visit to obtain more information regarding an SOC341 report received by the Department on 02/17/2026 for an incident that occurred on 02/14/2026, involving Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (2). LPA conducted interviews and obtained documents. No deficiencies were cited during todays visit. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator, whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026
Feb 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 02/04/2026, at approximately 3:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to conduct a case management - incident visit and met with Grant Wegner, Administrator. LPA is conducting a case management visit to obtain more information regarding two SOC341 reports received by the Department on 01/22/2026 for two separate incidents that occurred on 01/11/2026 and 01/13/2026, involving Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (2). LPA conducted an interview and obtained documents. No deficiencies were cited during todays visit. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator, whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2026
Sep 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not dispense medications as prescribed Facility staff yelled at residents
On 09/30/2025, at approximately 10:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding LIC802 - Complaint Report #21-AS-20250725125922, which was received by Community Care Licensing (CCL) on 07/25/2025 regarding the allegations that facility staff did not dispense medications as prescribed and facility staff yelled at residents. LPA met with Grant Wegner, Administrator. On 07/31/2025, LPA Florio obtained documents and conducted interviews. Based on staff schedules obtained, staff interviews were conducted with Staff 1 (S1), Staff 2 (S2), Staff 3 (S3), and Staff 4 (S4) which revealed conflicting statements about the staff not dispensing medications as prescribed and staff yelling at residents. continued on LIC9099C... Unsubstantiated continued from LIC9099... On 09/30/2025, LPA conducted further interviews with S1 and Resident 1 (R1) who was named in the complaint and both denied any knowledge of medications not being dispensed as prescribed since a prior allegation which was addressed under the facility's previous name Watermark on complaint #21-AS-20250224164341 which was received by the Department on 02/24/2025. Additionally, both denied any knowledge of staff yelling at residents. On 09/30/2025, LPA also obtained documents which revealed that none of R1's discontinued medications for a month prior to this complaint were administered after their discontinuation orders were received by the facility. Based on interviews conducted and records obtained, the department received conflicting information regarding the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and records obtained, the allegations that facility staff did not dispense medications as prescribed and facility staff yelled at residents are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with Grant Wegner, Administrator, whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250725125922
Sep 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident did not receive timely medical Staff do not ensure resident is adequately fed
On 09/30/2025, at approximately 12:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding LIC802 - Complaint Report #21-AS-20250801085042, which was received by Community Care Licensing (CCL) on 08/01/2025 regarding the allegations that Resident 1 (R1) did not receive timely medical and staff do not ensure Resident 2 (R2) is adequately fed. LPA met with Grant Wegner, Administrator. On 08/06/2025, LPA Florio obtained documents and conducted interviews. Based on interviews conducted with facility staff S1 and S2, all the appropriate emergency responses were activated and implemented and CPR was performed according to direct instruction from 911 dispatched phone assistance while EMS were in route to the facility. These instructions included performing CPR in the resident's bed. Per S1, S2, and R1's Death Report dated 07/24/2025, R1 died at the hospital. Continued on LIC9099C... Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099... On 09/30/2025, LPA attempted to speak via telephone with R1's spouse who was present during the incident but was unable to reach them. LPA was able to speak with R1's adult child (W1) who was contacted immediately by R1's spouse when the incident occurred. W1 states that they were close by and arrived at the facility within minutes of receiving the phone call. W1 states EMS were already present performing care upon their arrival. On 08/06/2025, LPA obtained R2's LIC602 Physician's Report dated 04/03/2024, which revealed that R2 is not on a special diet, does not have any listed dietary restrictions, and is ambulatory. Based on an interview conducted with the dietary staff (S3) the same day, R2 submits requests to have meals in their room because they prefer not to leave their room. S3 states these meals are delivered when requested, which is usually 2-3 meals per day. On 09/30/2025, LPA conducted an interview with R2 who states that they don't like the food but that food is mostly delivered when they order it. R2 states there have been a few times that staff forget. R2 states they have a call bell that they can use to call staff and remind them or request food, but admits that they choose not to use it in these instances. R2 states that family brings food as a treat or to have their preferred snacks around, but that this is not because there is not enough food being served in the facility. Based on interviews conducted and records obtained, the department received conflicting information regarding the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and records obtained, the allegations that resident did not receive timely medical and staff do not ensure resident is adequately fed are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with Grant Wegner, Administrator, whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250801085042
Sep 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 09/15/2025, at approximately 3:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to conduct a case management - incident visit and met with Karina Loera, Memory Care Director. LPA is conducting a case management visit to obtain more information regarding an incident report and SOC341 received by the Department on 09/09/2025 for an incident that occurred on 09/07/2025, involving Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (2). LPA conducted and interview and obtained documents. No deficiencies were cited during todays visit. Exit interview was conducted with Memory Care Director, whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2025
Jul 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 7/10/2025, at approximately 3:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to conduct a case management - incident inspection and met with Grant Wegner, Administrator. LPA is conducting a case management visit to obtain more information regarding an incident report received by the Department on 05/23/2025 for an incident that occurred on 05/20/2025, involving Resident 1 (R1). LPA conducted and interview and obtained documents. No deficiencies were cited during todays visit. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator, whose signature on form confirms receipt of document.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2025
Mar 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
At approximately 12:00 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAss) Julie Florio and Ethel Conteras arrived unannounced to conduct a Pre-Licensing visit and met with Grant Wegner, Executive Director. Applicant has applied for a Change of Ownership for an existing Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) identified as The Watermark at Napa Valley 286803919. At Approximately 12:30 PM, LPAss conducted a physical plant walk-through and observed the following: The facility is a three-story facility with independent living, assisted living and memory care residents. Facility was found to be clean with all exits free from obstruction. Facility had emergency lighting. LPAs observed required postings including the CCL complaint poster, personal rights poster, and a long-term care ombudsman poster. Facility has an Infection Control plan and Emergency Disaster Plan on file. LPAs observed a supply of at least two (2) days of perishable and and seven (7) days of nonperishable foods as required by Title 22 Regulations. Emergency evacuation chairs, emergency supplies, water, and a first aid kit were observed. Toxins were observed to be stored inaccessible to residents. Hot water temperatures tested within Title 22 Regulations of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility received an approved fire clearance on 11/21/2024 for 91 Ambulatory, 129 Non-Ambulatory residents, and 20 bedridden residents. Fire extinguishers were observed charged. At approximately 2:00 PM, LPAs conducted file review and found the following: staff files reviewed had current First Aid and CPR certifications as well as all the required paperwork. Resident files reviewed had all the required paperwork. Medication was observed to be centrally stored and secure. At approximately 4:40 PM, LPAs conducted Component III with Applicant. LPAs notified Applicant that once licensed, they will need to complete a new Admission Agreement and Care Plan for the current resident in care. No Deficiencies cited during today's Pre-Licensing visit which is now complete. Facility is ready to be Licensed as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly. Continued on LIC809C... Continued from LIC809... LPA will submit Pre-Licensing Application Report to the Application Unit Analyst in Sacramento. Application Unit Analyst will notify Applicant of Status. Exit interview conducted with ED, whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2025
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Feb 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Office
COMP II by CAB successfully completed Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 240 Census (if any clients in care): 143 Method: Telephone call with CAB COMP II Participants: Grant Wegner, Administrator; David Adams, Company President; Shannon Betker, analyst. Applicant/administrator participated in COMP II at CAB via telephone call with analyst at CAB. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified by confirming driver’s license number. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed the understanding of Title 22. Component II was successfully completed. Applicant and administrator were advised to email/fax signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID to CAB. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2025
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Napa County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
4K Senior Home
Napa · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$5,750 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Celebrity Haven II
Napa · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$5,250 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Golden Hearts Senior Care
Napa · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$5,800 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Napa Valley Royale
Napa · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$5,900 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Heart to Heart Provider
Napa · Small home · 0.8 mi away
$5,800 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Vine Hill Senior Living
Napa · Small home · 0.8 mi away
$5,900 a month to start · Covelight estimate