Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

The Terraces of Los Gatos

Large community·Licensed for 458·Los Gatos, California

Licensed since 1992Licence #430708817
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,350 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,500
  • Home sizeLicensed for 458Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit273 of 458 beds occupiedApril 6, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitSeptember 17, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderHumangood & Humangood NorcalSince 1992 · 6 licensed homes

The Terraces of Los Gatos is a large care community in Los Gatos — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 458 residents since 1992. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about The Terraces of Los Gatos

Is The Terraces of Los Gatos licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is The Terraces of Los Gatos licensed for?

458 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has The Terraces of Los Gatos been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 1992, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 20 state visits over the same years.

Is The Terraces of Los Gatos still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does The Terraces of Los Gatos cost?

$4,350 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,350–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 33 other homes of a similar licensed size across Santa Clara County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,469 to $6,496 a month, and the middle figure is $5,237 (n = 33 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does The Terraces of Los Gatos take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Humangood & Humangood Norcal, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Humangood & Humangood Norcal — at least 6 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Mission Oaks Hospital is 1 mile away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can The Terraces of Los Gatos keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 21 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

The Terraces of Los Gatos license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “TERRACES OF LOS GATOS, THE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #430708817. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 458 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Humangood & Humangood Norcal, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1992, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 20 state inspection visits since 1992, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 1992, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 20 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 1992, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 21 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 71 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
387 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. LICENSED TO SERVE AGES 60 YRS & OVER. APPROVED FOR 71 BEDRIDDEN CLEARANCE (55 IN AL AND 16 IN MC). LICENSE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS & CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 21. NON- AMBULATORY RESIDENTS RESTRICTED TO ROOMS APPROVED BY FIRE AUTHORITY.

938 - CONTINUE CARE CONTRACT (CCC)

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 21 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,350a month to start

Likely $3,350–$5,500

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,350a month

Likely $3,350–$5,650

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,350likely $3,350–$5,500

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,350–$5,650
$4,350
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,750
$6,350
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,200–$7,450.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 800 Blossom Hill Road, Los Gatos, CA 95032Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 21 documents for this home, and its records count 20 visits since 1992. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 17, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
20
Most recent visit
September 17, 2026
Occupied · April 6, 2026 visit
273 of 458 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated April 11, 2023 to April 6, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (4). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 2
  • Total complaints3typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1992.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025780202455120234502021110

The last 36 months — 16 of 21 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with Wellness Director (WD) Alexandra Matjunas. On 08/21/2026, the Department received two incident reports regarding incidents of medication error of two residents (R1 and R2). On 08/20/2026, resident R1 of Assisted Living unit was administered wrong medications which were another resident's medications. On 08/18/2026, resident R2 of Memory Care unit was administered wrong dosage of medication. On 08/25/2026, LPA spoke with WD on the phone. LPA interviewed WD. LPA requested the physician reports, care plan, centrally stored medication forms, and Medication administration records of R1 and R2. LPA reviewed the incident reports with medication error of the facility in year 2026, there are 4 medication error SIRs. Deficiencies noted for today's visit. See LIC809-D. Exit interview was conducted with WD. The report was provided to WD for review and signature.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 18, 2026

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (A) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the interview and records reviewed, on 8/20/2026, resident R1 was administered wrong medication, and on 8/18/2026 resident R2 was administered wrong dosage of medication. That poses an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2026

Plan of correction: Wellness Director agreed to submit a plan of correction to prevent the similar incident to happen again by the POC due date and agreed to submit a staff training log to CCL office.

Apr 6, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are overcharging residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced investigation visit to deliver the investigation finding and met Wellness Director Alexandra Matjunas (WD). On 01/27/2026, the Department received a complaint with the allegation that facility staff are overcharging residents. On 02/04/2026, the Department conduct an initial investigation visit. On 02/25/2026, the complaint was referred to Continuing Care Contracts Bureau to investigate. On 03/05/2026, Continuing Care Contracts Bureau Financial Analyst started to interview witness and facility staff. Continue on LIC9099-C. Page 1 of 2. Unfounded On February 25, 2026, the Continuing Care Contracts Bureau received a complaint alleging that Terraces of Los Gatos is overcharging residents. It was further alleged that the community participates in the Below Market Price (BMP) Housing Program established by the Town of Los Gatos through Ordinance 2313, adopting Chapter 29 of the Town Code, and that the provider denied participation in the program. The Department conducted interviews with both the Witness and the Executive Director. Based on the information obtained, the Department determined that the allegation does not constitute a violation of laws or regulations within the Department’s jurisdiction. Rent control provisions and local BMP housing requirements do not apply to Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs), and rental agreements are not considered continuing care contracts subject to Continuing Care Contracts Bureau (CCCB) oversight. Accordingly, the Department has determined that the allegation is unfounded meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No citations noted at today’s compliant investigation visit. Exit interview conducted with WD. This report was provided to review and for signature. A copy of this report was provided to WD. Page 2 of 2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260127093623
20257 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit and met with Health Service Administrator (HSA). The facility has 40 Assisted Living residents and 16 Memory Care residents. License, ADM certificate, and Personal rights posters were observed in the facility. LPA reviewed 7 resident files and 6 staff files. LPA toured the Memory Care Unit. LPA tested the delay exit door. The alarm sounded when the exit door was pushed; and the door was able to open after 30 seconds. Two caregivers came on site around 20 seconds after the alarm sounded. The memory care unit has 16 bedrooms. LPA randomly picked up one resident room to inspect. LPA toured the activity room and living room, and dining area in memory care unit. Room temperature was observed at 74 degree F. LPA toured the memory care unit patio area. LPA toured Assisted Living unit. The elevator was observed functional. LPA toured 2 resident rooms in Assisted Living Unit. LPA toured the activity rooms, dining room. Laundry room and chemical supplies room were observed locked. Evacuation chairs were observed in the stairs. LPA toured the Independent Living Unit and toured one resident room and fitness center. LPA toured the common area. Two days perishable foods and seven day nonperishable foods were observed sufficient. Room temperature was observed at 74 degree F, hot water temperature was observed at 118 degree F. The temperature of the freezer was observed at 0 degree F and the temperature of the refrigerator was observed at 37 degree F. Medication room, laundry room were observed locked. Continue on LIC809-C. page 1 of 2. The facility was equipped with fire alarm, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Carbon monoxide detector was tested, and was working. Fire extinguisher was serviced on 4/24/2025. The last the facility fire drill was last conducted on 12/08/2025. No citation issued today. This report was reviewed with HSA and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2025
Dec 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with Director of Wellness (DW) Alexandra Matjunas. DW stated all these residents live in Independent Living unit.On 12/05/2025, the Department received 4 incident reports regarding resident R1, R2, R3 and another incident report regarding R1. On 12/02/2025, resident R1 was given wrong medication nurse (S1) found the mistake immediately. R1 was also given the correct medication. S1 wanted to assessed R1 to check if R1 was fine but R1 refused and stated he/she was fine upon incorrect administration. R1 allowed S1 to assess later. The facility notified R1' PCP, and follows PCP's instruction. The facility notified pharmacist who stated the medications that S1 gave to R1 had no interaction to each other. DW stated R1 is fine and still lives in independent living unit. After the incident, the facility provide the staff training to S1, nurses and Med Techs. DW stated this is the first time of the incident regarding S1 and R1. On 12/01/2025, resident R2 reported R2's jewelry was lost to staff. Around 2:00PM, R1 called police department and reported the incident. DW stated police officers came to the facility to interview staff and residents. On 12/03/2025, Housekeeper supervisor reported that resident R3 lost Diamond Omega Watch. DM stated police officers came to the facility to interview staff and residents. Continue on LIC809-C. Page 1 of 2.. On 12/03/2025, resident R1's fiduciary reported that someone outside may financial abuse R1. DW stated police officers conducted interview on 12/09/25. LPA interviewed DW, Housekeeper Supervisor, 3 residents, and 1 staff. LPA toured resident rooms. LPA obtained the staff training material, copies of the updates of the incidents, and the statement of staff. At this time, these cases are under review and the Department will conduct a follow visit if warranted. Exit interview was conducted with DW. The report was provided to DW for review. A copy of the report was provided to DW. Page 2 of 2..the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2025
Sep 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with Director of Wellness (DW) Alexandra Matjunas. Today's visit is to follow up with the case management visit on 09/04/2025. . On 8/12/2025, resident R1's private companion (PC) noticed that R1 breathing changed and lip turned in blue color. PC notified the facility wellness center. The facility LVN went on site and 911 was called immediately. R1 was sent to hospital. On 08/12/2025, at 08:55AM, R1 passed away in the hospital. On 09/04/2025, LPA conducted an unannounced case management visit at the facility. LPA interviewed DW and Health Service Administrator (HSA). LPA requested R1's physician report, assessment, and progress notes. On 09/09/2025, LPA received R1's death certificate. Based on the review of R1's death certificate, R1's cause of death is heart disease, natural cause. Based on the interview and records reviewed, there is no suspicion of R1's death. No citation noted today. Exit interview was conducted with WD. The report was provided to WD for review and signature. A copy of the report was provide to WD.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2025
Sep 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with Assisted Living Director Lady Anthonett Turman (ALD). On 6/4/2025, the department received an incident report regarding resident R1 from ALD. On 6/6/2025, LPA interviewed ALD. ALD stated on 6/4/2025, R1's old bank account was closed and a new bank account was opened. On 6/6/2025, R1's bank already reimbursed the full amount of money of the 3 unknown transactions to R1. ALD provided the police report case number. ALD stated R1 did not leave bank statement in the room and did not have any missing check. LPA toured R1's room in the assisted living unit and interviewed R1. R1 stated he/she does not have any complaint. R1 stated the facility staff are helpful. R1 confirmed he/she received the refund from the bank of the full amount of money of the 3 unknown transactions. On 9/4/2025, LPA interviewed 3 staff and a private companion of R1. 4 out of 4 stated they never saw R1's bank statement, checkbook or bank card. Based on the interview and records reviewed, The investigation finding for this case is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegation did or did not occur. No Citation noted today. Exit interview was conducted with ALD. The report was provided to ALD for review and signature. A copy of the report was provide to ALD.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 4, 2025
Sep 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with Director of Wellness (DW) Alexandra Matjunas. On 8/13/2025, the Department received a report from DW regarding resident R1. On 8/12/2025, R1's private companion (PC) noticed that R1 breathing changed and lip turned in blue color. PC notified the facility wellness center. The facility LVN went on site and 911 was called immediately. R1 was sent to hospital. LPA interviewed DW and Health Service Administrator (HSA) Bill Penrod. LPA requested R1's physician report, assessment, and progress notes. DW stated he/she will send R1's death certificate to CCL office when available. This case needs further investigation. Exit interview was conducted with DW. The report was provided to DW for review and signature. A copy of the report was provided to DW.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 4, 2025
Jun 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analysts Steve Chang conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with Health Service Administrator Bill Penrod (BP). The purpose of today's visit is to deliver immediate exclusion letter for an individual (referred as PC1). LPA read and explain the immediate exclusion letter to BP that the Department determined that PC1 must not have continued or future contact with clients/residents or presence in the facility constitutes a threat to the health and safety of clients/residents in care. BP agreed and understood that PC1 is not allowed to work, resident or volunteer in the facility. PC1 is not an employee or employed by the facility; he/she was hired by resident as Private Caregiver through a Home Care Agency (HCA). Exit interview was conducted with BP. The report was provided to BP for review and signature. A copy of this report and the exclusion letter for PC1 were provided to BP.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2025
Jun 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with Assisted Living Director Lady Anthonett Turman (ALD). On 6/4/2025, the department received an incident report from ALD. On 6/3/2025 at 11:25AM, ALD received a notice from resident R1 that his/her bank account has been hacked. There were 3 transactions he/she cannot recognize. ALD spoke with R1 and R1's family member. ALD suggested R1's family member to report to police depart. On 6/6/2025, LPA interviewed ALD. ALD stated on 6/4/2025, R1's old bank account was closed and a new bank account was opened. On 6/6/2025, R1's bank already reimbursed the full amount of money of the 3 unknown transactions to R1. ALD provided the police report case number. ALD stated R1 did not leave bank statement in the room and did not have any missing check. LPA toured R1's room in the assisted living unit and interviewed R1. R1 stated he/she does not have any complaint. R1 stated the facility staff are helpful. R1 confirmed he/she received the full amount of money of the 3 unknown transactions. LPA requested R1's physician report and appraisal needs and service plan. This case needs further investigation. Exit interview was conducted with LAD. The report was provided to ALD for review and signature. A copy of the report was provided to ALD.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2025
May 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with Director of Wellness Alexandra Matjunas (DW). On 5/13/2025, the Department received a incident report regarding an private caregiver abuse a resident. On 5/14/2025, the Department interviewed a staff on the phone. On 5/15/2025, LPA interviewed DW, resident R1's family on the phone and NextGen Operation Supervisor on the phone. DW stated R1 is an independent living resident. LPA and DW went to tour resident R1's room and to interview R1, R1 refused to have an interview. LPA was unable to enter R1's room. LPA toured another room with similar layout as R1's room with DW. LPA requested R1's physician report, appraisal needs and service plan, and the contract between R1 and NextGeb. The case need further investigation. Exit interview was provided with DW. The report was provided to DW for review and signature. A copy of the report was provided to DW.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2025
20245 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Marcela Yanez and Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit and met with Sandra Mirasol, Residential Living Director (RLD). LPAs stated the purpose of the visit. LPAs toured Assisted Living building with RLD inside and out, which include upstairs and downstairs. LPAs randomly inspected the following, but not limited to resident bedrooms: 45,47, 60, 66,70,and 72 LPAs randomly tested 4 resident bedrooms water with thermometer and measured range from 116.0 to 118.0 degrees F. LPAs also inspected the dining area and kitchen of the Assisted Living building. LPAs observed the kitchen area LPAs observed perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. No obstructions were noted during tour. LPAs toured the Memory Care building inside and out. LPAs randomly inspected the following, but not limited to resident bedrooms: 1,2,3,4,5 and 9. LPAs randomly tested 6 bedrooms water temperature with thermometer and measured to range from 110.0 to 115 degrees F. LPA tested delayed egress doors which activated auditory sound when pressed. LPAs toured the Independent Living with RLD inside and out which included 3 floors and multiple different buildings. LPAs randomly toured the following, but not limited to, resident bedrooms: M151, M153, M154,M155, Q66,M355, and P397. LPA observed fire extinguisher was last serviced on 04/16/2024. LPA reviewed Fire and Earthquake log. the last Drill was last conducted on 12/06/2024. Facilities Sprinkler system was last inspected on 09/06/2024 Page 1 Out of 2. LPA reviewed resident records for 10 residents.. LPA reviewed 5 staff records and found them to be complete. LPAs interviewed 13 residents and 3 staff. LPA provided RLD with a flyer "Important updates to Dementia Care & Miscellaneous Changes, Effective January 1, 2025." LPA requested a copy of the following documents: 1.LIC 500, Personnel Summary 2. LIC 308, Designation of Administrative Responsibility 3.LIC400, Affidavit Regarding Client/Resident Cash Resources 4. Liability Insurance 5. Qualifications of Administrator (Certificate) 6. Please review your facility program for updates (incorporating new laws and/or regulations) No deficiency were cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Residential Living Director Sandra Mirasol and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Page 2 Out of 2. END OF REPORT.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2024
Oct 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: A resident was inappropriately touched by a staff

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Manuel Monter and Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Residential Living Director Sandy Mirasol. On September 26, 2024, the Department received a complaint alleging a resident was inappropriately touched by a staff. It has been alleged that R1 was inappropriately touched on September 19, 2024. On September 28, 2024, LPA obtained and reviewed Independent, Assisted and Memory Care Unit’s copy of resident and staff rosters including names of residents who were recently, temporarily, and permanently admitted at their Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) which is under the CA Department of Health. Page 1 Out of 2. Unfounded Staff S1 provided a detailed information of each 3 residents who were from their Assisted, Independent and Memory Care. 1 Out 3 residents (referred as R1) were transferred to Skilled Nursing Facility on September 2024, because of a fall while others need higher level of care and/or rehabilitation. S1 stated that R1 has never been back to his/her independent residence since he/she was admitted to SNF. S1 stated R1 will be returning to his/her independent living unit on September 28, 2024. S1 is the director of independent living unit wherein S1 was informed about the alleged sexual abuse by R1 that happened on September 19, 2024, and the investigation conducted by law enforcement agency at SNF. S1 stated that the alleged sexual abuse did not occur within the premises of the Assisted, Independent and Memory Units. S1 stated that they don't have staff working at SNF. Based on record review and interviews, R1 has neurocognitive disorder. On October 4, 2024, LPA Monter and Tarin interviewed Skilled Nursing Health Services Administrator (HSA). HSA stated resident R1 was located at the SNF from September 10 - September 28, 2024. HSA stated he/she is aware of the allegations that R1 has made during his/her stay at the SNF and reported it. HSA stated local law enforcement did come to the SNF and took a report. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and records review, the department has found that the above allegations were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies cited, an exit interview conducted with Residential Living Director Sandy Mirasol and a copy of the report was provided. Page 2 Out of 2. END OF REPORT.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240926164112
Oct 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Case Management visit and met with Administrator Peter Morris. The purpose of the visit was to follow up on a Death Report submitted to the Department on 05/21/2024. The Death Report stated that resident R1 was found deceased on 05/20/2024 at approximately 08:00 AM. The Death Report stated that R1 had complained of neck pain as well as having experienced vomiting and a headache at 12:01 AM on 05/20/2024. The Death Report states R1 was offered to call 911 but R1 refused. R1 was observed deceased in R1's bed at around 08:00 AM. During today's visit, LPA Marrufo interviewed staff S1 and S2. S1 stated to have received a call from R1's spouse on 05/20/2024 stating that R1 appeared deceased. S1 stated to have entered R1's living unit and observed R1 to be laying on R1's bed with R1's feet touching the floor and R1's back resting on pillows and blankets. S1 stated 911 was called and firemen, paramedics, and police arrived. S1 stated police approved of the removal of R1's body from the facility. S2 stated during interview that the facility has not received a coroner's report. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator Peter Morris and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2024
Jan 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced case management to amend a complaint investigation deficiency page, LIC9099-D issued on January, 22, 2024.(26-AS-20230404163203) LPA met with Residential Living Director Sandy Mirasol. The deficiency page is being amended due to citing the incorrect deficiency. LPA printed out a copy of the amended report. LPA requested Residential Living Director resend POC, with updated code section. No deficiencies cited during todays visit. A copy of the report was provided to Residential Living Director Sandy Mirasol.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2024
Jan 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents are being financially abused.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA Monter met with ADM and stated the purpose of the visit. On 4/4/2023, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. On 4/11/2023 the Department conducted the initial investigation of financial abuse by private caregiver PC1 and PC2 who misappropriated resident R1’s finances and applies undue influence toward R1 for financial gain. On 4/04/2023, the Department conducted an initial investigation visit to the facility that a resident is being financially abused. On 4/11/23 the Department received additional information and the case was reopened. page 1 of 2 Substantiated page 2 of 2 Continuation from page 1 Based on investigation, document reviews, and interviews, private caregiver 1(PC1) & private caregiver 2 (PC2) engaged in conduct that is inimical to the health and morals, welfare or safety of either an individual in or receiving services. PC1 & PC 2 engaged in acts of financial malfeasance concerning the operation of a facility, including, but not limited to, improper use or embezzlement of client moneys and property or fraudulent appropriation for personal gain of facility moneys and property, or willful or negligent failure to provide services for the care of clients. Based on documentation, interviews and observation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies were cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22 during today’s visit, see LIC 9099-D. This report was reviewed with Administrator and a copy of the report was provided. Appeal Rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230404163203

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.58(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 24, 2024

1569.58 Persons prohibited from being a licensee, ... or holding certain positions ... appeal; petition for reinstatement (a)The department may prohibit any person ... person who is not a client and who has done any of the following This requirement was not met as evidenced by; Based on interviews conducted, and evidenced reviewed, private caregiver PC1 and PC2 misappropriated resident R1’s finances and applied undue influence toward R1 for financial gain. This poses an immediate threat to residents health, safety and personal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2024

Plan of correction: ADM stated those two private care givers would no longer be let back in the facility. ADM stated he will send a written plan of action on overseeing private care givers hired by residents, including those in independent living. ADM to submit POC to LPA by 01/24/24.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 12/22/2023 at 3:30 p.m. Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Steve Chang and Maria (Mita) Partoza conducted an unannounced Case Management visit and met with Health Services Administrator (HSA) Bill Penrod and explained that the purpose of the visit was to hand deliver a letter of exclusion for 2 individuals private care giver 1 (PC 1) and private care giver 2 (PC 2) from the facility. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Health Services Administrator Bill Penrod and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 22, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Humangood & Humangood Norcal, licensed since 1992, operates 6 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Santa Clara County