Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Sunset Villa Assisted Living
Mid-size home·12 while this license was open·El Centro, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Home size12 while this license was openMid-size care home · the state license record
- Room at the last state visit0 of 0 beds occupiedAugust 5, 2026 · not a current opening
Sunset Villa Assisted Living in El Centro held a license for a mid-size care home — a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE). The license covered 12 residents, first issued in 2022. The state lists this licence as “Closed, Licensee Initiated.”
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Sunset Villa Assisted Living
Is Sunset Villa Assisted Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Closed, Licensee Initiated,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Sunset Villa Assisted Living licensed for?
12 residents while this license was open — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Sunset Villa Assisted Living been cited?
1 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Sunset Villa Assisted Living still open?
This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
What does Sunset Villa Assisted Living cost?
This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Sunset Villa Assisted Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license was held by The Good Shepherd, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Can Sunset Villa Assisted Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is on this closed license’s record, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Sunset Villa Assisted Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “SUNSET VILLA ASSISTED LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #134604528. The state lists this license as “Closed, Licensee Initiated,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- This license covered 12 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- This license was held by The Good Shepherd, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 5, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 12 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved by the state
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 4 residents
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 12 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; ROOMS 5 & 6 ARE TO BE USED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 4 RESIDENTS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Typical starting rate
$4,500a month to start
Likely $3,500–$5,500
Covelight’s researched range for Imperial County · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,500a month
Likely $3,500–$5,700
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,500–$5,500
Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Imperial County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,700
- $4,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$8,850
- $6,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure
Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Imperial County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Where it is
- 1203 Driftwood Drive, El Centro, CA 92243Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2022. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 5, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 8
- Most recent visit
- August 5, 2026
- Occupied at that visit
- 0 of 0 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 21, 2026 to August 5, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations1typical 0
- Type B citations2typical 0
- Substantiated allegations3typical 0
- Total complaints1typical 1
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 8 of 9 documents
Aug 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent scabies outbreak. Staff left residents in soiled diapers. Staff are not following infection control requirements.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Roman conducted a phone call/zoom meeting to deliver findings in the above complaint allegations. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the contact with Licensee, Quetzali Khanis. On October 20, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging staff did not prevent scabies outbreak, staff left residents in soiled diapers, and staff are not following infection control requirements. During the investigation, LPA D. Roman collected pertinent facility records and conducted interviews with staff. Regarding the allegations of staff did not prevent scabies outbreak and staff are not following infection control requirements. Staff interviews revealed that the facility did not have sufficient personal protective equipment for caregivers to use when caring for infected residents. Staff interviews also revealed that facility management was not transparent in disclosing the contagious scabies outbreak, nor followed infection control requirements. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) Substantiated Regarding the allegation of staff left residents in soiled diapers. Staff interviews revealed that the facility was severley understaffed. Interviews revealed that facility management directed caregiver staff to double residents diapers. Staff interviews also revealed that caregivers were covering multiple shifts and working longer hours. Based on the evidence obtained, the preponderance of evidence standard was met, therefore, the allegations are Substantiated. The deficiency is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 and is noted on the attached LIC 9099-D. A plan of correction was jointly formulated with Licensee, Quetzali Kahns. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Quetzali Kahns, to whom a copy of this report, LIC 9099D and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2026 · control 08-AS-20251020150354
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87470(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 31, 2026
Infection Control Requirements: All staff... providing direct care to a resident who has a contagious disease shall wear Personal Protective Equipment to prevent exposure to infectious agents... gloves, gowns, masks, respirators, shoe coverings and eye protection. Based on LPA interviews the Licensee did not provide PPE to facility staff which posed a health and safety risk to 12 of 12 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee closed facility on 10/22/2025.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.618(c) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 31, 2026
Other Provisions (c) The facility shall employ, and the administrator shall schedule, a sufficient number of staff members... Based on LPA interviews the Licensee did not employ a sufficient number of staff which posed a health and safety risk to 12 of 12 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee closed their facility on 10/20/2025.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 31, 2026
Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights. (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. Based on LPA interviews residents were not provided with healthful and comfortable accommodations when double diapered which posed a health and safety risk to 12 of 12 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee closed their facility on 10/20/2025.
Aug 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Questionable death. Staff are inappropriately administering medication to residents. Underaged staff providing care to residents. Staff are not meeting residents laundry needs.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Roman conducted an over the phone meeting to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the phone call to Licensee, Quetzali Kahns. On October 20, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging a questionable death, staff are inappropriately administering medication to residents, underaged staff providing care to residents, and staff are not meeting residents’ laundry needs. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, and records review. It was alleged that a resident's cause of death was related to a fall at the facility however, CCLD’s Investigative Bureau identified the resident’s death was due to their underlying health issues. (Cont. on LIC-9099C) Unsubstantiated Interviews with facility staff revealed that a DSP was terminated for having accidentally dropped an elderly client, interviews were unsure if the client dropped was the resident in question pertinent to the questionable death. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that medications were appropriately provided to the residents in care. Staff interviews revealed no underage staff was providing care to residents. Staff Interviews also revealed that resident’s laundry needs were being met although washer machines may have been broken the facility had its laundry needs met at their sister facilities. Records Review revealed that the resident was admitted into the facility on June 23, 2025. The client had a DNR on file. The resident’s Physician’s Assessment identified that the resident was DX of Alzheimer’s/Dementia w/hallucinations w/behavioral disturbances, hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation, thyroidism, and hypercholesterolemia. Based on interviews and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Quetzali Khans, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2026 · control 08-AS-20251020150354
May 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide assistance to resident in care resulting in a fall.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Roman conducted a phone call contact to deliver findings in the above complaint allegation to the Licensee, Quetzalli Kahnis. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the call with Facility Licensee, Quetzalli Kahnis. On June 24, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging facility staff did not provide assistance to resident in care resulting in a fall. During the investigation, LPA D. Roman reviewed pertinent facility records, conducted interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources. Resident interviews revealed contradicting information regarding the ratio of staff at the facility. Staff interviews revealed that the facility was understaffed. Caregivers reported multiple incidents in which their ratio was (1) one staff caring for (12) twelve residents for at least two hours. (Cont. on LIC9099C) Substantiated Based on the evidence obtained, the preponderance of evidence standard was met, therefore, the allegation was Substantiated. The deficiency is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 and is noted on the attached LIC 9099-D. An exit interview was conducted with Facility Licensee, Quetzalli Kahnis, to whom a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058) were provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2026 · control 08-AS-20250624144211
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 21, 2026
87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This regulation was not met as evidenced by LPA record review, observations and interviews. Licensee did not meet staffing regulations which threatened the physical, emotional or health & safety of 12 of 12 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2026
Plan of correction: The facility has been closed as of 12/05/2025.
Dec 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Roman conducted a case management visit for the purpose of monitoring the facility closure. LPA met with Administrator, Quetzali Kahnis to discuss the purpose of the visit and to obtain additional information in regards to the progress of the facility closure. The Administrator advised LPA on 11/25/25 of their plans to sell the property and close the facility. During today's visit LPA along with facility staff conducted a tour of the interior and exterior of the property to confirm the closure of operations of the Residential Care Facility for Elderly (RCFE). LPA D. Roman confirmed that the administrator has terminated all operations and collected the site license. LPA also confirmed that there are no residents in care. According to the licensee, all residents have been transferred to another facility and one resident returned to their family. An exit interview was conducted with the Administrator, Quetzali Kahnis, Licensee Rights along with a copy of this report was provided to Administrator and their signature on this form confirms receipt of the report and their rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2025
Oct 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Roman conducted an unannounced Case Management Inspection. LPA D. Roman identified himself to Evelyn Ramirez, and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA D. Roman informed the caregiver to have contacted the Licensee/Administrator, Quetzali Kahnis via telephone. The Administrator reported that the Sunset Villa will be closing and that they have provided the resident's POA with a 60 day notice. During today's visit, LPA D. Roman along with facility staff toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected bedrooms and bathrooms. The facility was sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. Smoke alarms and fire extinguishers were present. Medication is in locked cabinets. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present, residents are provided with cooked meals. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to residents, medication are locked. No pools or bodies of water on the premises. LPA D. Roman inquired on the new residents records file. Facility staff provided 1 complete record for a new resident reporting to have face sheets in an emergency binder for the 4 of 5 residents that recently moved in from their sister facility Majestic Villa, which closed. Facility staff reported that the residents were moved into the facility on 10/15/2025. An exit interview was conducted with caregiver staff, Evelyn Ramirez, to whom a copy of this report, deficiencies page, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(b)(15) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 5, 2025
Resident Records 87506 (b) Each resident’s record shall contain at least the following information: (15)The admission agreement and pre-admission appraisal, specified in Sections 87507, Admission Agreements and 87457, Pre-admission Appraisal. Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 4 out of 4 residents, by having incomplete or missing required documentation which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee is to provide the Department proof of completion by POC date.
Jun 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst, David Roman (LPA D. Roman), conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator, Siklalic Garcia. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of 12 clients, of whom all may be non-ambulatory and two of which may be bedridden. LPA D. Roman toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. Water temperature was measured at 105 degrees F. No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per Administrator, Siklalic Garcia, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 11:15 AM. Emergency lighting and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguishers were present and serviced on 11/03/2024. First aid kits were complete and readily accessible. Resident records reviewed had required documentation. Staff records reviewed contained required documentation. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Siklalic Garcia, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights were provided during the visit. Their signature acknowledges the receipt of their rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025
Mar 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility background was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself, was granted entry by Facility Manager Angelica Quintero. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Facility Manager Quintero. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of 12 residents all of whom may be non-ambulatory; 4 of which may be bedridden with rooms 5 and 6 to be used for bedridden residents; and hospice is approved for 4 residents, in at any given time at the facility site. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is 8 residents living at the facility. There were 8 residents present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by House Manager Quintero, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, between 73-degrees and 76-degrees Fahrenheit (F). Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were not all compliant: kitchen sink delivered hot water at 145 degrees F but according to staff is only used by staff; sink in restroom #1 delivered hot water at 138.6 degrees F; sink in restroom #2 delivered hot water at 137 degrees F; hot water in restroom #3 delivered hot water at 116.4 degrees F. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present, and all safely stored. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to residents. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in a locked cabinet. LPA inspected the medication and found that medications were properly labeled. The facility-maintained medication logs which LPA reviewed. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per Facility Manager Quintero, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were present (03) and serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. LPA interviewed residents and staff. LPA reviewed staff and resident records. During today’s visit there were 8 residents on the facility premise but one left during the visit. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. There were deficiencies observed and cited during today's annual inspection and may be reviewed on the LIC809-D page of this report. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Angelica Quintero to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received. LPA requested House Manager Quintero to submit a current Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, Personnel Report LIC 500, Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E, and Residential Infection Control Plan LIC 9282 (6/23), to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms are available at www.ccld.ca.gov.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024
The state marks this report as 9 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Mar 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required annual inspection and in conjunction conducted this case management visit at the facility. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Angelica Quintero, House Manager. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the basic elements of the visit with House Manager Quintero. During today’s visit, LPA provided the House Manager consultation and provided additional information regarding the Department’s website, Records to be Maintained at the Facility – Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (LIC 311F), Changes to Administrator Certification Training Requirements (PIN 23-14-CCLD), Criminal Background Clearance Transfer Request (LIC9182) and Criminal Record Exemption Transfer Request (LIC 9188) Form Updates (PIN 23-08-CCLD), Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly Reference Guide to Administrator, Staff, and Volunteer Training Requirements (PIN 23-16-ASC), Revised Infection Control Regulations and Permanent Adoption (PIN 23-12-ASC); and 2023 Chaptered Legislation Affecting Adult and Senior Care Facilities: Summary and Implementation (PIN 23-19-ASC). No deficiencies were observed or cited during the case management visit. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Angelica Quintero and a copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 3/22) were provided to the House Manager at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes in Imperial County near this one, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Heart & Hand
El Centro · Mid-size home · 1.6 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Typical in Imperial County
Compassionate Senior Care 247
El Centro · Mid-size home · 1.7 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Typical in Imperial County
Casa Elite
El Centro · Mid-size home · 2.7 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Typical in Imperial County
Sonrisa Villa
Holtville · Large community · 11 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Typical in Imperial County