Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Stonehaven Senior Living
Large community·Licensed for 116·Fresno, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,450 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,650
- Home sizeLicensed for 116Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit105 of 116 beds occupiedJuly 1, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitAugust 17, 2026CDSS inspection record
Stonehaven Senior Living is a large care community in Fresno — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 116 residents since 2025.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Stonehaven Senior Living
Is Stonehaven Senior Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Stonehaven Senior Living licensed for?
116 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Stonehaven Senior Living been cited?
0 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 21 state visits over the same years.
Is Stonehaven Senior Living still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Stonehaven Senior Living cost?
$4,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,650. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size in Fresno that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,049 to $4,271 a month, and the middle figure is $3,595 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Stonehaven Senior Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: we have not yet confirmed that an entry on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver list is this home’s. Ask the home: “Do you take the Medi-Cal Assisted Living Waiver?” The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Haven Assisted Care LLC; Bayshire LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Bayshire LLC — at least 4 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Community Regional Medical Center is 3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Stonehaven Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 16 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Stonehaven Senior Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “STONEHAVEN SENIOR LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #107209480. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 116 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Haven Assisted Care LLC; Bayshire LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 21 state inspection visits since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 21 state visits in that period.
- 11 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 116 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 16 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 16 residents
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 116 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 16 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 1-33. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 16.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 16 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,450a month to start
Likely $3,450–$5,650
From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,450a month
Likely $3,450–$5,800
With a studio and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$4,450likely $3,450–$5,650
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,800
- $4,450
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,200–$8,900
- $6,450
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverWe have not yet confirmed that an entry on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver list is this home’s. Ask the home: “Do you take the Medi-Cal Assisted Living Waiver?” The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
9 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,350–$4,500.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Carmel Village at ClovisClovis · 5.9 mi · Large community$4,300Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Terraces at San Joaquin GardensFresno · 6.6 mi · Large community$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- The WindhamFresno · 7.7 mi · Large community$3,395Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Saddle Ridge Senior LivingClovis · 7.8 mi · Large community$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- The GroveFresno · 7.8 mi · Large community$4,195Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Cedarbrook Memory Care CommunityFresno · 8.4 mi · Large community$3,600Listed on Seniorly · memory care · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Paintbrush Assisted Living and Memory CareFresno · 8.7 mi · Large community$3,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Summerfield of FresnoFresno · 9.0 mi · Large community$3,595Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Oakmont of North FresnoFresno · 9.6 mi · Large community$4,895Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 1717 South Winery Avenue, Fresno, CA 93727Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2025, the state has filed 17 documents for this home, and its records count 21 visits since 2025. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 1, 2026.
- On file since
- 2025
- State visits
- 21
- Most recent visit
- August 17, 2026
- Occupied · July 1, 2026 visit
- 105 of 116 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 11 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 27, 2025 to July 1, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 11 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations3typical 1
- Substantiated allegations3typical 2
- Total complaints11typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2025.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 17 of 17 documents
Jul 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: 'Staff abandoned resident Staff refuse to accept resident back to facility
On 7/01/2026, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) M. Medina and K. Brown conducted a subsequent complaint visit. LPAs introduced themselves, stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance to facility. LPAs met with Administrator, Radhika Jaw and Mike Salway to conduct complaint visit. During the investigation, interviews were conducted and information was gathered. During interviews it was stated that Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to skilled nursing on 3/20/2026, facility provided documentation that documents attempted e-mail correspondence with skilled nursing to obtain updated medical assessment for R1 and had a scheduled re-assessmented for 5/06/2026. Documents provided by skilled nursing facility document that as of 4/14/2026, R1 had a beside 1:1 companion which is not provided at facility and an open order for intramuscular injections which would require a higher level of care. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis, therefore, we have dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260415095554
Jul 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 7/01/2026, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) M, Medina and K. Brown conducted a Case Management visit due to observations made during facility tour conducted during complaint (#24-AS-20260518094805) visit on this date. During facility tour, LPA Brown observed kitchen scissors and a pairing knife in the drawer of the kitchenette as well as laundry detergent and cleaning supplies under the sink. All items were unsecured and accessible to resident 1 (R1) and resident 2 (R2). Review of medical assessment for R1 documents that these items could pose a danger to resident. Items were immediately removed and locked at time of inspection. A deficiency is being cited in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 on the attached 9099D. Exit interview conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report provided to facility via email for facility records. Appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 1, 2026
(b) Residents may have access to items specified in subsection (a) for personal use unless there is documentation, as specified in Section 87457, Pre-Admission Appraisal or Section 87463, Reappraisals, that indicates the resident's or other residents’ safety would be at risk if allowed access. (1) The licensee shall implement reasonable interventions in order to ensure that access to the items specified in subsection (a) does not pose a hazard to other residents. **This was not meant as evidenced by LPA observation of kitchen scissors, pairing knife, and cleaning items unlocked and accessible to resident 1 (R1).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2026
Plan of correction: Items were removed and locked at time of facility visit. DEFICIENCY CLEARED AT TIME OF FACILITY VISIT.
Jun 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to resident's call button in a timely manner
On 06/27/2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Garza completed an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings. LPA was unable to locate staff and went to Skilled Nursing Facility for assistance in getting in contact with Administrator. LPA spoke with several staff (kitchen, caregivers and RN) who were unaware of who to contact. Housekeeping Director, Percilla Mendez was found and contacted Administrator, Radhika "Rads" Jawa. Reason for visit was explained to Administrator and Administrator arrived an hour and 15 minutes later. During the complaint investigation interviews were conducted and documentation was requested and reviewed. During interviews with residents, 6 of 6 residents confirmed that when a call button is pushed it takes a significate amount of time for staff to answer the call lights, "if they come at all". The allegation listed above is SUBSTANTIATED. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met per California Code of Regulations, meaning the allegation occurred or has occurred.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260106091029
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 7, 2026
87411 Personnel Requirements – General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not met as evidence by LPA interviews conducted. The licnesee did not comply with the section cited above in that 6 of 6 residents interviewed disclosed staff are not answering call lights in a timely manner, when residents need assistance, “if they come at all”. This poses a potential health safety and or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2026
Plan of correction: All staff meeting and training will be conducted. In service sign in sheets and training material for assiting residents in a timely manner will be provided to CCL by POC date as proof of correction.
Jun 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 6/24/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced Annual Required inspection. LPA arrived, stated purpose of visit and met with Administrator, Radhika "Rads" Jawa to conduct today's inspection. . Currently there are 106 residents in care, facility has two separate buildings on campus as well as a large activities building. The Hope building has rooms 1 through 24 and the Faith building has rooms 1 through 33. Facility buildings toured. Each building has separate dining rooms, menus posted for residents in care. Kitchen toured, refrigerator was at 37 degrees F and freezers were at 0 degrees F. Facility observed to have 2-day supply of perishable and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food available. Facility receives food deliveries 2 times per week. Facility also has an additional emergency food supply available. Resident rooms toured during facility tour. LPA observed private bathrooms in resident rooms to have slip resistant surfaces in showers, grab bars and shower chairs available. Faith building also has a walk in shower room available. Resident rooms observed to have adequate lighting and a comfortable temperature for residents. Residents receive housekeeping every other day as well as laundry services on a daily basis. Facility is equipped with smoke detectors, fire sprinklers, and pull stations throughout buildings. Fire extinguishers are present throughout buildings, in each hallway with a service date of 11/02/2025. LPA reviewed staff schedules and fingerprint clearance during inspection. LPA observed staff 1 to have fingerprints and not associated, staff 2, staff 3, staff 4, staff 5 to not be fingerprinted. Due to time constraints, LPA will return to review medication, staff and resident files, complete inspection tool and document any additional observations. Deficiency cited on the attached 809-D. Pursuant to Health & Safety Code, an immediate civil penalty of $500 is assessed. Exit interview conducted and a copy of report provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 24, 2026
May 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff disturbing resident’s sleep.
On 5/22/2026, Licensing Program Analyst M. Medina and Licensing Program Manager S. Moua met with the facility licensee and administrator. Finding was delivered for the above allegation. The Department conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on the interviews conducted and records reviewed, staff conduct 2-hour checks on the residents to provide care and supervision. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were issued. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of report provided for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2026 · control 24-AS-20251216125900
May 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Office
An Office meeting was conducted on this date to discuss concerns regarding the facility, obtain clarifying information, and provide support. Present during the meeting were: Brenda White, Regional Manager See Moua, Licensing Program Manager Melinda Medina, Licensing Program Analyst D. Adam Salow, Licensee Benjamin Cortes, Licensee Mike Salway - Administrator of Stonehaven Senior Living Radhika Jawa - Administrator Carissa Danielson - Admissions The following subjects were discussed: -Licensee responsibilities -Administrator Qualifications -Reporting Requirements -Proper Evictions The Department also delivered findings on opened complaints during this office meeting. TSP was offered and accepted. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of report provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2026
Apr 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff sell drugs to residents
On 4/17/1026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit. LPA arrived, stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Administrator to conduct complaint visit. During complaint visit, LPA toured facility, conducted interviews and gathered documentation. During interviews and review of documentation, Resident 1 (R1) stated that staff 1 (S1) attempted to sell them drugs. R1 provided text messages between them and S1, review of records confirmed that the telephone number belonged to S1. Based on LPA’s interviews, and review of documentation the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report provided for facility records. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260309122748
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 17, 2026
a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1)To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. **This was not met as evidenced by Resident 1 (R1) stated that staff 1 (S1) attempted to sell them drugs. R1 provided text messages between them and S1, review of records confirmed that the telephone number belonged to S1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2026
Plan of correction: S1 was suspended then employment was terminated. Administrator conducted an all staff meeting on 3/26/2026 and 3/27/2026, agenda and sign in sheets provided to LPA during visit. DEFICIENCY CLEARED AT TIME OF VISIT
Apr 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure medications are being dispensed as prescribed Staff did not ensure resident records were updated in a timely manner
On 4/17/1026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit. LPA arrived, stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Administrator to conduct complaint visit. During complaint visit, LPA toured facility, conducted interviews and gathered documentation. The information obtained during interviews states that Resident 1 (R1) was prescribed medication and that the medication was not administered when received. There are fax records documenting a physician order but it does not indicate who it was faxed to and the time stamp information for the fax is prior to when ordered by the physician, the medication for R1 had not been received by facility. Although the allegation may have happened, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and copy of report this report was provided for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260115134506
Apr 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not meeting resident care needs Staff did not assist resident with medical appointments
On 4/17/1026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit. LPA arrived, stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Administrator to conduct complaint visit. During complaint visit, LPA toured facility, conducted interviews and gathered documentation. During interviews and review of documentation, the facility assists R1 with arranging a third party service to transport Resident 1 (R1) to and from scheduled appointments. Additional information obtained during interviews states that R1 had not missed any appointments but agency could not provide written record of appointment schedule without a supoena. During record review and interviews, it was disclosed that R1 had been out of facility on two separate occasions for illness and treated at an area hospital. During the first hospital visit R1 was out of the facility for two days and during the subsequent hospital visit R1 was treated and then transferred to a skilled nursing facility. R1 returned to the facility approximately 45 days later. Although the allegations may have happened, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and copy of report this report was provided for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260203112430
Apr 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer medication to a resident in care
On 4/17/1026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit. LPA arrived, stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Administrator to conduct complaint visit. During complaint visit, LPA toured facility, conducted interviews and gathered documentation. Medication for R1, was called into pharmacy and was awaiting approval from doctor. Per interviews, R1's physician did not provide refills on medication for R1. R1's physician had limited availability on Tuesday and Thursday, and open only during morning hours. R1 has recently changed their primary physician. Although the allegation may have happened, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and copy of report this report was provided for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260413092203
Mar 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff is not allowing resident to return to the facility
On 3/18/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Mike Salway, CEO and Radhika Jawa, Assistant Administrator to conduct visit. During the course of the investigation, information was gathered, documents were reviewed, and interviews conducted. Based on information gathered during interviews and review of documentation, there was information on discharge paperwork that the physician ordered skilled nursing for rehabilitation prior to return to community. This Department has found that the above allegations is UNFOUNDED, meaning they were false, could not have happened, and/or were without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260313112421
Mar 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff forged a resident's signature
On 3/18/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted a subsequent complaint visit to gather additional information and deliveri findings for complaint. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, gathered information and toured facility. Based on information gathered during interviews and documentation reviewed, Resident (1) provided paperwork to LPA with their signature on a form and stated that they had not signed it. During an internal investigation conducted by facility after initial complaint visit on 2/23/2026, it was determined that a former staff who was working on special project, which included all resident's medical assessments faxed over a signed document to R1's physician, which R1 did not sign. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are being cited on the attached 9099-D. Exit interview conducted and a copy of report and appeal rights provided for facility records. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260219132210
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87207 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 3, 2026
No licensee, officer or employee of a licensee shall make or disseminate any false or misleading statement regarding the facility or any of the services provided by the facility. **This was not met as evidenced by: Resident (1) provided paperwork to LPA h with their signature on a form and stated that they had not signed it. During an internal investigation conducted by facility after initial complaint visit on 2/23/2026, it was determined that a former staff who was working on special project, which included all resident's medical assessments faxed over a signed document to R1's physician, which R1 did not sign.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator to conduct training with staff regarding regulation and submit agenda and sign in sheet to Fresno Regional office by POC due date.
Mar 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not administering resident's medication in a timely manner Staff engaged in a verbal altercation with residents
On 3/18/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted a subsequent complaint visit to gather additional information and deliver findings for complaint. LPA met with Mike Salway, CEO and Radhika Jawa, Assistant Administrator to conduct visit. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, gathered information, reviewed documentation and toured facility. Based on information gathered during interviews and documentation reviewed, there is no documentation on medication administration records that R1 did not receive medication as prescribed by physician or that staff engaged in a verbal altercation with residents. The department has insufficient information regarding the above allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260108144909
Oct 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a severe fracture due to staff neglect Staff did not assist resident after a fall Staff made inappropriate comments towards residents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)'s Shawna Doucette and Brianna Miranda conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Radhika Jewa. LPA's explained the purpose of the visit. Staff Radhika Jewa contacted Consultant Jaycee Sanderson who responded to assist with the visit. LPA's reviewed records. LPA's interviewed staff and residents. Based on interviews and records review, it was undetermined if a resident sustained a severe fracture due to staff neglect. Based on interviews, LPA's received conflicting statements regarding R2's fall. It is undetermined if staff did not assist resident after a fall. Based on interviews, it is undetermined if staff made inappropriate comments towards residents. Unsubstantiated Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A copy of this report was provided and signed by Staff Radhika Jewa.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250922144728
Oct 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 10/27/2025 LPAs B. Miranda & S. Doucette arrived to the facility unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPAs initially met with Radhika Jawa Assistant Administrator, and Consultant Jaycee Sanderson arrived later. During the unannounced visit LPAs observed the following: LPAs reviewed staff roster and cleared staff on licensing system. LPAs observed staff files, schedule, and conducted interviews which verified some staff on duty to not have proper background clearance. Jaycee sent uncleared staff home and informed staff not on duty with uncleared background clearances to not return to work until background clearance is completed. LPAs observed some residents without call buttons and another resident with call button not working. LPAs were informed that the call button board only holds 6-7 calls and then will stop sounding if the board is full. LPA also observed R5’s call button in the bathroom to not be in working order. Jaycee later explained the system for the bathroom call lights was unplugged. Jaycee plug in system and placed a notice to not unplug. LPA observed R5’s bathroom to have dead cockroaches and debris. LPA observed R4’s file and conducted interviews. Documentation shows on 10/5/2025 R4 fell and hit his head. A timely report was found to not be made to licensing. The facility failed to call 9-1-1 and seek medical attention, this did not allow R4 to directly refuse medical services to emergency services or to be properly assessed. Under California Title 22 citations will be issued. Exit interview was conducted with Radhika Jawa, a copy of this report LIC809, LIC809-D, and appeal rights were provided to Radhika Jawa Assistant Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 28, 2025
(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (2) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department or This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not ensure fingerprint clearance has been obtained for all staff members on and off duty, which poses an immediate Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2025
Plan of correction: Jaycee had all staff without proper background clearance to leave the facility until background clearance has been completed.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(g) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 28, 2025
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (g) The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health including, but not limited to, an apparent life-threatening medical crisis except as specified in Sections 87469(c)(2), (c)(3), or (c)(4). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to call for 9-1-1 after R4 fell and hit their head, which poses an immediate Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2025
Plan of correction: Facility will be speaking with family regarding calling emergency services for residents who fall and hit their head.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 7, 2025
87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the licensee failed to report R4's fall in a timely manner to CCLD, which poses a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2025
Plan of correction: Jaycee stated reports will be sent for any incidents that happen at the facility.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87303(i)(1)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 7, 2025
87303 Maintenance and Operation (i) Facilities shall have signal systems which shall meet the following criteria: (1) All facilities licensed for 16 or more and all residential facilities having separate floors or buildings shall have a signal system which shall: (B) Transmit a visual and/or auditory signal to a central staffed location or produce an auditory signal at the living unit loud enough to summon staff. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the licensee failed to have a proper signal system within the facility. LPA tested call buttons which did not alarm due to call button board being full. The call button board hold only 6 calls, this poses a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2025
Plan of correction: Jaycee will have a call button board added to each wing.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 7, 2025
87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation & interviews the licensee failed to maintain R5's bathroom which has dead cockroaches and debris, this poses a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2025
Plan of correction: Jaycee will have R5's room checked in and cleaned.
Apr 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Rachel Bruce and Jimmy Duarte, arrived at the facility for the purpose of conducting a pre-licensing inspection as a result of change of ownership effective October 2024. LPAs were greeted by Administrator Jaycee Sanderson. LPAs toured the facility inside and outside. The facility was observed to be clean, free from clutter and was odor free. The common area rooms were observed to have adequate furnishings, window coverings and lighting. LPAs inspected three resident rooms and observed them to be with in regulatory requirements. All bedrooms had the required furniture, to include beds with good mattresses, night stands, and chairs. All rooms had overhead lighting; however; some rooms were missing lamps. Administrator will purchase lamps for every room, regardless of resident's request. Water temperature in rooms were within range. Showers had slip resistant flooring with grab bars. In addition, there were grab bars next to the toilets. Hot water temperature was observed to be 126 F in the kitchen sink and there was a sign indicating there is extremely hot water. LPAs observed an adequate amount of perishable and nonperishable food. There was also 72 hours of emergency food and water properly stored. The frozen food freezer door was repaired since last inspection and is functioning properly. Continued in LIC809-C Continued from LIC809 Medications are locked in a medical designated office. LPAs conducted pill count and compared numbers to the medical distribution system Point Click Care (PCC). Fire extinguishers noted to be inspected December 2024 and were located throughout the facility. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors are combined with the sprinkler system and were also tested in December of 2024. Component III was not needed at today's visit as operations are continuing from the previous owner. Pre-Licensing Inspection is complete. Applicant has met all pre-licensing requirements. LPA will submit documentation to CAB in Sacramento for final review prior to license being issuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2025
Jan 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Office
COMP II by CAB successfully completed Applicant/administrator participated in COMP II at CAB telephone call with analyst at CAB. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified by presenting photo ID via phone. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed the understanding of Title 22. Component II was successfully completed. Applicant and administrator were advised to email/fax signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID to CAB. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Staff qualifications and responsibilities 3. Applicant and Administrator qualifications 4. Program policy: Abuse, admission agreement, medication management, reporting incidents to CCL, restricted & prohibited conditions 5. Grievances, Complaints, Community resources 6. Physical plant, food service 7. Application document review and technical assistance: Criminal record clearance, Health screening, Fire clearance, First Aid/CPR certificate, Administrator certificate, Financial verification, Pre-licensing inspection, Compliance history, Control of propertythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2025
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Fresno County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
New Horizons Fresno
Fresno · Small home · 0.7 mi away
$4,000 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Helping Hands Senior Care
Fresno · Mid-size home · 0.7 mi away
$4,300 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Vintage Gardens
Fresno · Large community · 0.8 mi away
$3,950 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Jan-Roy Place of Fresno
Fresno · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,000 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Serenity Garden Home 2
Fresno · Small home · 1.3 mi away
$4,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
Sgs Care Home I
Fresno · Small home · 1.3 mi away
$4,400 a month to start · Covelight estimate