Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa

Small home·Licensed for 6·Fair Oaks, California

Licensed since 2018Licence #342700350Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,050
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJune 17, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
  • Last state visitJune 17, 2026CDSS inspection record

Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa is a small care home in Fair Oaks — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2018. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa

Is Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 18 state visits over the same years.

Is Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa cost?

$4,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,350–$5,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size across Sacramento County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Mercy San Juan Medical Center is 3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SPRING GLEN ELDERLY CARE VILLA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #342700350. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 18 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 18 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR THREE (3)

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,100a month to start

Likely $3,350–$5,050

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,100a month

Likely $3,350–$5,250

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,100likely $3,350–$5,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,350–$5,250
$4,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,950–$8,400
$6,100
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

12 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$7,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 5929 Spring Glen Dr, Fair Oaks, CA 95628Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 17 documents for this home, and its records count 18 visits since 2018. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 17, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
18
Most recent visit
June 17, 2026
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 26, 2022 to June 17, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2018.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261202025660202433020231102022451

The last 36 months — 11 of 17 documents

20261 state visit · 2 documents
Jun 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility's outdoor perimeter fencing is in disrepair, posing a safety risk to residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Doris Espinoza, to open a complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. During visit, LPA toured the premises. LPA observed a portion of the fence surrounding the property to be in disrepair. LPA observed portion of the fence in disrepair to be inaccessible to residents in care and away from any pathways or emergency exits. Based on LPA's observations, it is determined that disrepair of the fence does not pose a safety risk to the residents in care. LPA issued a deficiency regarding repair of the care home, including backyard fence, in a separate inspection conducted on June 17, 2026. Based on observations, the above allegation is found to be UNFOUNDED. A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was provided. Signatures on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260609142455
Jun 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the care home unannounced on June 17, 2026 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 117 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on site. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home and observed emergency exits to be unobstructed. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked two (2) residents' medications, six (6) resident files, and three (3) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. As a result of today's inspection, deficiencies are being cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, Section 87465 due to medications being accessible to residents in staff bedroom, and Section 87303 due to cleanliness and repair of the care home, including backyard fence in disrepair, debris in backyard, interior floors in disrepair, dishes in kitchen sink, and dish washer in disrepair. Deficiencies are listed on 809-D pages. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signatures on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2026
20256 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Michael Hood and Marisa Chiarelli arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Doris Espinoza, to conduct a case management health and safety check. LPAs conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for resident use. LPAs observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. LPAs checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPAs observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPAs observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPAs checked two (2) residents' medications and observed medication to be locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. LPAs reviewed six (6) resident records and three (3) staff records. LPAs observed that all records were complete and staff training was complete. LPAs observed staff on the premises to have a criminal background clearance on file. As a result of today's inspection, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2025
Oct 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Doris Espinoza, to conduct a case management health and safety check. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are five (5) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked two (2) residents' medications and observed medication to be locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. LPA reviewed six (6) resident records and three (3) staff records. LPA observed that all records were complete and staff training was complete. LPA observed staff on the premises to have a criminal background clearance on file. As a result of today's inspection, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025
Aug 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care due to neglect or lack of care and supervision

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Doris Espinoza, to deliver findings into the complaint allegation listed above. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: Allegation: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care due to neglect or lack of care and supervision ** Report continued on 9099-C ** Unsubstantiated On May 18. 2025, resident (R1) was admitted to the hospital due to complaints of stomach and back pain. While being evaluated by medical staff, it was discovered R1 had “aged” fractures, including an age indeterminate fracture deformity of the humeral neck. Per ER doctor, the injuries could have been caused by a “subacute” (slower onset illness). Doctor had no clear evidence to support R1 was being mistreated, however, doctor found it “inconsistent” that no falls were reported despite R1 sustaining “multiple subacute to chronic compression fractures.” The Department conducted interviews with several staff, who all denied ever witnessing R1 sustaining a fall or being involved in any sort of incident which could have caused injury. Staff reported R1 receives one-on-one (1:1) care and staff are with R1 at all times. R1 tends to walk without the assistance of their walker, so staff will escort R1 around the house. The Department conducted interviews with several residents, including R1 who still lives in the facility. Most residents have dementia, but overall there were no complaints from the residents regarding the staff and care being provided at the facility. The Department interviewed relevant party who oversees R1’s care since August of 2023. Relevant party had no concerns of abuse at the facility. Relevant party was only aware of one (1) fall, which occurred on August 15, 2024 for which R1 received medical attention. Relevant party noted R1 used to have an authorized representative who was neglecting and financially abusing R1 over a few year period. Relevant party believed “aged fractures” could have occurred during the time period in which authorized representative was overseeing R1’s care. During visit conducted on May 22, 2025, LPA Michael Hood and Local Long Term Care Ombudsman met with R1 regarding complaint. R1 stated that they were “pretty fine” and denied having hurt their neck. R1 stated that they haven’t fallen but came close to falling. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250520090643
Jun 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Doris Espinoza, regarding information obtained during inspection conducted on May 22, 2025. During visit, LPA obtained a copy of the facility's surety bond for the Department's record to allow the facility to handle resident cash. Despite surety bond, facility will not handle resident cash and will bill families after additional services provided. LPA also obtained a permit from the county regarding adding an additional bedroom to the care home. Fire inspection has already been requested and facility is in the process of obtaining fire clearance for the room. As a result of today's visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2025
May 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 5/22/25 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are five (5) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 115 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed knives, cleaning products, and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked two (2) residents' medications and found medication to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed five (5) resident files and two (2) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted and copy of report given at the conclusion of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2025
Apr 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Doris Espinoza, to conduct a case management health and safety check. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are five (5) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed knives, cleaning products, and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked two (2) residents' medications and observed medication to be locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. LPA reviewed six (6) resident records and two (2) staff records. LPA observed that all records were complete and staff training was complete. LPA observed staff on the premises to have a criminal background clearance on file. As a result of today's inspection, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

An informal conference was conducted at 9:00 AM on September 30, 2024, with Sacramento North Regional Office via Microsoft Teams. The purpose of this informal conference meeting is to address citations issued during inspections conducted on 6/19/2024 and 9/10/2024. The Administrator was told that this Informal conference is a part of the Administrative Action process and that further noncompliance may result in an elevation to a formal noncompliance conference, which could lead to a referral to the Department's legal division for possible revocation of license. The following Licensing staff were present: Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Michael Hood and Cassie Mikkelson, and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Anthony Perez The following facility representatives were present: Administrator Doris Espinoza, and Licensee Leilani Aragon The following topics were covered during today's meeting: · An overview regarding 6 Type A citations, 9 Type B citations, and 4 civil penalties · Recommendations for pending plan of corrections · Recommended hours for Administrator's presence at the facility. Administrator submitted updated documents prior to meeting showing new hours for Administrator to be at facility. Facility was notified that the Department may increase monitoring at the facility. Technical support was offered to facility representative during meeting. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report will be provided to the facility via email. A copy must be signed and returned to the Department.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2024
Sep 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Michael Hood and Cassie Mikkelson arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Melissa Szeto, to follow-up on plan of corrections made to the facility during an inspection conducted on 6/19/2024. During today's visit, LPAs conducted a tour of the care home. LPAs observed backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPAs inspected medication and conducted file reviews for six (6) residents and two (2) staff. LPAs observed residents to have property and valuable records on file. LPAs observed staff at the care home to have CPR and first aid training. LPAs observed staff to have health screenings on file. LPAs observed knives and disinfectants unlocked and accessible to the residents in care in the kitchen area. LPAs observed medications administered not documented with start dates. LPAs observed new staff to have an insufficient amount of initial training documented. LPAs observed an insufficient amount of nonperishable food supply on cite. As a result of today's inspection, deficiencies are being cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Civil penalties were assessed as a result of today's visit. Deficiencies are listed on 809-D pages. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.625(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2024

(1) The department shall adopt regulations to require staff members of residential care facilities for the elderly who assist residents with personal activities of daily living to receive appropriate training. This training shall consist of 40 hours of training. A staff member shall complete 20 hours, including six hours specific to dementia care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.626 and four hours specific to postural supports, restricted health conditions, and hospice care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.696, before working independently with residents. The remaining 20 hours shall include six hours specific to dementia care and shall be completed within the first four weeks of employment. The training coursework may utilize various methods of instruction, including, but not limited to, lectures, instructional videos, and interactive online courses. The additional 16 hours shall be hands-on training. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs' observations and records reviewed, facility did not ensure that staff received initial training and documentation for initial training was maintained at the facility, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024

Plan of correction: Facility will ensure to complete initial training for all newly hired staff and maintain documentation for training at the facility at all times. Facility will complete initial training for any staff missing initial training and submit documentation for initial training to LPA by POC due date of 9/25/2024. A civil penalty in the amount of $250 was assessed for repeat violation.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87555(b)(26) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2024

87555 General Food Service Requirements (b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (26) Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs' observations, facility did not ensure to have a seven (7) day nonperishable food supply on cite, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024

Plan of correction: Facility will ensure to have a two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day nonperishable food supply on cite. Licensee will complete a statement of understanding regarding regulation 87555 and submit statement to LPA by POC due date of 9/25/2024.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 11, 2024

(a) Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs' observations, the facility did not ensure that storages for disinfectants, cleaning solutions, and knives were locked and inaccessible to the residents at all times, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024

Plan of correction: Facility will conduct an in-service training for staff regarding regulation 87309. Facility will submit date of training and materials to LPA by POC due date of 9/11/2024. A civil penalty in the amount of $250 was assessed for repeat violation.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 11, 2024

(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs' observations and records reviewed, facility did not ensure to document medications on Centrally Stored Medication Forms for all residents with some medications having no identifiable start date, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024

Plan of correction: Facility will complete a weekly medication audit and document audit for the next month. Facility will submit documentation for weekly audit to LPA each week. A civil penalty in the amount of $250 was assessed for repeat violation.

Jun 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 6/19/24 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are five (5) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 116 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. LPA walked the perimeter of the care home and checked medication storage. LPA reviewed six (6) resident files and two (2) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. As a result of today's inspection, deficiencies are being cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Deficiencies are listed on 809-D pages. An immediate civil penalty per Health and Safety Code § 1548 in the amount of $500 for the date of 6/19/2024 is assessed for a violation that the department determines was a fire clearance violation. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signatures on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Sacramento County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Sacramento County