Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Silvana Senior Care 2

Small home·Licensed for 6·Roseville, California

Licensed since 2021Licence #312700958
(916) 586-4713From the state roster · September 13, 2026Plan a visit
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,250
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedApril 1, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 1, 2026CDSS inspection record

Silvana Senior Care 2 is a small care home in Roseville — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Silvana Senior Care 2

Is Silvana Senior Care 2 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Silvana Senior Care 2 licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Silvana Senior Care 2 been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.

Is Silvana Senior Care 2 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Silvana Senior Care 2 cost?

$5,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,150–$6,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 8 other homes of a similar licensed size in Roseville that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $5,750 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 8 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Silvana Senior Care 2 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Silvana Senior Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Silvana Senior Care, Inc. — at least 5 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Roseville is 2.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Silvana Senior Care 2 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Silvana Senior Care 2 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SILVANA SENIOR CARE 2”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #312700958. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Silvana Senior Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 15 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 1, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX(6).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,100a month to start

Likely $4,150–$6,250

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,100a month

Likely $4,150–$6,400

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,100likely $4,150–$6,250

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,150–$6,400
$5,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,850–$9,500
$7,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

11 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,450–$6,250.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1245 Crescendo Dr, Roseville, CA 95678Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 15 documents for this home, and its records count 15 visits since 2021. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 1, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
15
Most recent visit
July 1, 2026
Occupied · April 1, 2026 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 3, 2021 to April 1, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202644120254402024110202312020221102021231

The last 36 months — 9 of 15 documents

The full record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 4 documents
Jul 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 7/1/26 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested for staff to notify Administrator that LPA is present at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. Administrator , Manavdeep Sohal, arrived to assist. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. The home is clean and well kept. LPA reviewed 4 resident files. Files are complete and well organized. LPA reviewed 2 staff files. Files are complete and well organized. LPA and licensee discussed needed documents from Home Health and hospice and notification vs approval of family members for identified medical evaluation of residents. LPA requested copies of the following be submitted to CCL: Liability insurance certificate and admission agreement copy, 7/14/26. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted with licensee and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2026
Apr 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi, Kevin Mknelly, and Melissa Parks, and Licensing Program Manager Troy Ordonez and Laura Munoz met licensee Krisztina Ivascu in person for an office visit. This meeting was initiated by licensee to discuss the following topics: Night supervision. Staff supervision for dementia residents. Live in staff. Annual Fees. Refund for hospice residents. Admin will email copies of proof of POC for 4/1/26 citation. During today’s office meeting no deficiencies cited. Copy of report provided to licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2026
Apr 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not refund authorized representative after resident passed away

On (date), Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Administrator,s designee, to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA also spoke with Admistrator by phone. LPA reviewed resident records, and conducted and interview of the Administrator. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. Records and interviews found that R1 passed away 4 days after admission and was receiving hospice care. R1 was admitted on 1/25/26 and passed away on 1/28/26. Belongings were removed from the home on 1/28/26 so R1 was a resident for 4 days. Administrator acknowledged that refund fees have not yet been paid As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Report reviewed with . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 1, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260324135409

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.652(c) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 10, 2026

(c) A refund of any fees paid in advance covering the time after the resident’s personal property has been removed from the facility shall be issued to the individual, individuals, or entity contractually responsible for the fees or, if the deceased resident paid the fees, to the resident’s estate, within 15 days after the personal property is removed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 1, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to refund the prorated rate for the remaining 26 days of the month by the POC date of 4/10/26.

Feb 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

On Tuesday February 10, 2026, at 9:00 AM, an informal conference was conducted virtually via Microsoft Teams Meeting. Present in the meeting was Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Maribeth Senty, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks, LPA Bethany Mirlohi, and Licensee representative Krisztina Ivascu. License was informed that this Informal conference is a part of the Administrative Action process and that further noncompliance may result in an elevation to a formal noncompliance conference, which could lead to a referral to the Department's legal division for possible revocation of license. The purpose of today’s meeting was to discuss solvency, plan of corrections, and facility administrators. Topic discussed: - Solvency - Past due annual fees - Plan of Corrections - Facility Administrators At this time, the Department agreed to monitor each facility. Additionally, the facility will provide the Department with the required documents and a schedule of each Administrator for each facility. Krisztina agreed to pay outstanding annual fees by 2/28/2026. The Department will submit a referral to the Technical Support Program. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. Informal meeting concluded and a copy of report will be emailed. Facility Representative Signature is expected to be signed and returned to LPA by close of business, 2/10/2026.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 10, 2026
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 11/25/25, LPA Kevin Mknelly met with The purpose of the meeting was to review late annual fees due for this and other homes. Administrator, on 11/19/25, committed to pay fees in their entirety today and submit proof to LPA. Administrator failed to pay fees as agreed. As a result of today's inspection, deficiencies were cited. Report reviewed, copy and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.185(e) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 1, 2025

) Fees for license or applications (e) The failure of an applicant for licensure or a licensee to pay all applicable and accrued fees and civil penalties shall constitute grounds for denial or forfeiture of a license. This requirement was not met based on records that show late fees. This poses a potential riskthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee showed LPA that payment was completed while LPA was present. POC cleared by visit.

Nov 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 11/19/25, LPA Kevin Mknelly met with Mirel Ivascu. Administrator Kristina Ivascu joined by phone. The purpose of the meeting was to review late annual fees due for this and other homes. Administrator committed to pay fees in their entirety today and submit proof to LPA. LPA will provide Admin the PIN numbers for the other homes. As a result of today's inspection, no deficiencies were cited. Report reviewed and copy to be emailed to licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2025
Oct 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not respect resident’s choices regarding their care needs. Staff did not ensure resident had the ability to request assistance when needed. Staff did not respond to resident’s request for assistance with care needs in a timely manner. Staff did not dispense medication according to doctor’s orders. Staff did not provide adequate personal hygiene care to resident. Staff did not follow proper personal hygiene protocols. Licensee did not ensure facility was free from pests. Staff did not ensure mats provided to residents maintained slip-resistant properties. Licensee did not provide planned activities for residents.

On 10/21/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with designee. Administrator was informed of the visit by phone. LPA conducted records review , facility inspection and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. Specific to the allegations pertaining to R1: Staff did not respect resident’s choices regarding their care needs; Staff did not ensure resident had the ability to request assistance when needed; Staff did not respond to resident’s request for assistance with care needs in a timely manner; Staff did not dispense medication according to doctor’s orders; Staff did not provide adequate personal hygiene care to resident; and, Staff did not follow proper personal hygiene protocols, additional corroborating eveidence was not found during this investigation. Report continued... Unsubstantiated Regarding the general allegations: Licensee did not ensure facility was free from pests; Staff did not ensure mats provided to residents maintained slip-resistant properties; Licensee did not provide planned activities for residents, LPA did not find additional corroborating evidence to support the allegations. Regarding activities, LPA advised licensee to continue to develop activities for those residents with varied abilities and interests that fall outside the standard routine activities offered to the group. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview with administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250708140603
Jul 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 7/3/25 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested for staff to notify Administrator that LPA is present at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. Administrator arrived to assist. Upon arrival a sole staff member was present with residents who did not have a criminal record clearance. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. The home is clean. All residents observed to have their care needs met during this inspection. LPA reviewed 2 resident files. Files are complete and well organized. LPA reviewed 2 staff files. Files are complete. LPA discussed updated dementia regulations with Licensee and link to resources was provided. Licensee will update administrator. As a result of this inspection, a deficiency is noted on LIC 809D Report reviewed and copy with appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(2)(B)(v) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 4, 2025

Criminal Record crealance- (2)(B)(v)(v) The volunteer is not left alone with clients in care. This requiemtn was not met when S1 was obseved as a volunteer left alone with residents. This posed an immediate risk to residentsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2025

Plan of correction: Staff returned. Licensee wil submit a understanding of volunteer requiremtns as well as a LIC 500 showing adequate staff resources by the POC date of 7/4/25

20241 state visit · 1 document
Jun 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 6/12/24 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested for staff to notify Administrator that LPA is present at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. Administrator arrived to assist. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. The home is clean. One of five residents are able to participate in an interview- resident stated they are happy with care. All residents observed to have their care needs met during this inspection. LPA reviewed 5 resident files. Files are complete and well organized. Recent incident of a fall with injury of R2 was discussed. Needed care was provided and R2 has returned to baseline. LPA reviewed 2 staff files. Files are complete. S1 interviewed and expressed understanding of current resident care needs. LPA and licensee discussed needed documents from Home Health and hospice and notification vs approval of family members for identified medical evaluation of residents. LPA requested copies of the following be submitted to CCL: Liability insurance certificate, LIC 500, resident roster and personnel docs for S2, by 6/19/24. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted with licensee and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2024

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.
Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Print a visit sheetCompare saved homesOpen saved homes

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Placer County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Brookdale Roseville

Roseville · Mid-size home · 0.7 mi away

$3,200 a month to start · Listed by the home

WheelchairDementiaHospiceBedridden

A Loving and Joyful Home RCFE

Roseville · Small home · 0.9 mi away

$5,250 a month to start · Covelight estimate

WheelchairDementiaHospiceBedridden

Breeze Senior Care

Roseville · Small home · 0.9 mi away

$5,300 a month to start · Covelight estimate

DementiaHospiceBedridden

Delight in Care

Roseville · Small home · 1.0 mi away

$5,000 a month to start · Covelight estimate

WheelchairHospice

Brilliant Care Home

Roseville · Small home · 1.1 mi away

$4,500 a month to start · Covelight estimate

WheelchairDementiaHospice

Golden Age Retirement Home

Roseville · Small home · 1.1 mi away

$5,200 a month to start · Covelight estimate

WheelchairHospiceBedridden
Explore Placer County
CallPlan a visit