Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Sg Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·North Hollywood, California

Licensed since 2022Licence #195850245
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,150 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,100
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 21, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 10, 2026CDSS inspection record

Sg Care is a small care home in North Hollywood — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2022. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Sg Care

Is Sg Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Sg Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Sg Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Sg Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Sg Care cost?

$4,150 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,400–$5,100. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Sg Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Sg Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Pacifica Hospital of the Valley is 1.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Sg Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Sg Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SG CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #195850245. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Sg Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 10, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,150a month to start

Likely $3,400–$5,100

From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,150a month

Likely $3,400–$5,300

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,150likely $3,400–$5,100

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,400–$5,300
$4,150
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,000–$8,450
$6,150
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

13 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,650.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7920 Vantage Avenue, North Hollywood, CA 91605Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 10, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
10
Most recent visit
August 10, 2026
Occupied · August 21, 2024 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated March 7, 2023 to August 21, 2024. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025110202413020232202022330

The last 36 months — 5 of 10 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Aug 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the required annual visit at 10:15 AM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the facility Administrator Zaruhi Harutyunyan. The Administrator arrived to the facility at 10:27 AM Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. Beginning at 10:29 AM LPA along with the facility Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: KITCHEN: LPA observed the kitchen area to be clean. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility had a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. LPA observed a secured cabinet which contained knives and other sharp objects. LPA observed a secured under-sink cabinet which contained cleaning chemicals and pesticides. COMMON AREAS: This included the living/dining room and hallway. LPA observed the living/dining room to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. The living room was observed to contain secured filing cabinets which contained facility files and resident medications, a television, and activities for resident use. LPA observed adequate seating for resident use. The hallway was observed to be clean and free from any obstructions. LPA observed a wall mounted fire extinguisher which was fully charged and purchased on 05/30/2026. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 10:34 AM and were functional at the time of the visit. CONTINUED ON LIC 809C. BEDROOMS: There are three (3) bedrooms in the facility; all are designated for resident use, and all are designated as dual occupancy rooms. LPA and facility Administrator toured all three (3) resident rooms. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Bedroom number one (1) is the approved bedridden room and contained a direct exit to the outside of the facility. Auditory alarms were observed to be functional on all facility exits. BATHROOMS: There are two (2) bathrooms at the facility. One (1) is designated as a resident restroom and one (1) is designated as a staff restroom. Both restrooms were observed to be clean and in good repair and all were equipped with nonskid surfaces. Grab bars were observed in the resident shower and by the resident toilet, all were properly secured. The water temperature was measured between 109.4 and 112.1 degrees Fahrenheit, which is in compliance with regulation. OUTDOOR SPACE: The facility had one (1) emergency exit gate located at the front of the facility. LPA observed clear passageways for emergency exit use. The facility had adequate shaded outdoor seating for resident use. Cameras were observed on the outdoors of the facility. Five (5) sheds were observed to be properly secured. The sheds were observed to contain a washer and dryer, cleaning products, an adequate supply of emergency food and water, cleaning chemicals, household supplies, and additional care supplies. RECORD REVIEW: Record review began at 11:03 AM. Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, consent forms, and personal rights. Six (6) staff files were reviewed. All staff files contained the required documents and trainings. Four (4) resident files were reviewed. All resident files reviewed contained all required documentation. No deficiencies were observed during record review. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medication review began at 12:24 PM. Medications for four (4) residents were observed. All medications reviewed were documented properly on their respective centrally stored medication and destruction record sheets. No deficiencies were observed during medication review. CONTINUED ON LIC 809C. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as they pertain to infection control are adequate. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date and is adequate. Both the facility’s emergency disaster plan and infection control plan are updated annually by the facility’s Administrator. The facility’s last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 06/26/2026. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed one (1) staff and one (1) resident. The resident interviewed stated that facility staff treat them well and are attentive to their needs. The staff member interviewed was knowledgeable on their roles and responsibilities, resident rights, the different forms of abuse and the appropriate reporting procedures for suspected abuse. During today’s visit LPA obtained a copy of the facility’s updated LIC 500, resident roster, liability insurance, and emergency disaster plan. No deficiencies were observed during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted. And a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 10, 2026

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Aug 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 10:12 AM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the facility Administrator Zaruhi Harutyunyan. The Administrator arrived to the facility at 10:33 AM Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. Beginning at 10:33 AM LPA along with the facility Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: KITCHEN: LPA observed the kitchen area to be clean. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. LPA observed a secured cabinet contain knives and other sharp objects. LPA observed a secured under-sink cabinet to contain cleaning chemicals that were locked and inaccessible to clients in care. BEDROOMS: There are three (3) bedrooms in the facility; all are designated for resident use, and all are designated as dual occupancy rooms. LPA and facility Administrator toured all three (3) resident rooms. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Bedroom number one (1) is the approved bedridden room and contains a direct exit to the outside of the facility. Auditory alarms were observed to be functional on all exits. Continued on LIC 809C. BATHROOMS: There are two (2) bathrooms at the facility. One (1) is designated as a resident restroom and one (1) is designated as a staff restroom. Both restrooms were observed to be clean and in good repair and all were equipped with nonskid surfaces. Grab bars were observed in the resident shower and by the resident toilet, all were properly secured. The water temperature was measured between 109.8 and 112.0 degrees Fahrenheit, which is in compliance with regulation. COMMON AREAS: This includes the living room and hallway. LPA observed the living room to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. The living room was observed to contain secured filing cabinets which contained facility files and resident medications, a television, and activities for resident use. LPA observed adequate seating for resident use. The hallway was observed to be clean and free from any obstructions. Required postings were observed throughout the facility. LPA observed a wall mounted fire extinguisher to be fully charged and purchased on 05/10/2025. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 11:20 AM and were functional at the time of the visit. OUTDOOR SPACE: The facility has one (1) emergency exit gate located at the front of the facility. LPA observed clear passageways for emergency exit use. The facility has adequate shaded outdoor seating for resident use. Cameras were observed on the outdoors of the facility. Five (5) sheds were observed to be properly secured. The sheds were observed to contain a washer and dryer, cleaning products, an adequate supply of emergency food and water, cleaning chemicals, and additional care supplies. RECORD REVIEW: Record review began at 11:15 AM. Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, consent forms, and personal rights. Three (3) staff files were reviewed. All staff files contained the required documents and trainings. Five (5) resident files were reviewed. All resident files reviewed contained all required documentation. No deficiencies were observed during record review. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medication review began at 12:05 PM. Medications for three (3) residents were observed. All medications reviewed were documented properly on their respective centrally stored medication and destruction record sheet. No deficiencies were observed during medication review. Continued on LIC 809C. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as they pertain to infection control are adequate. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date and is adequate. Both the facility’s emergency disaster plan and infection control plan are updated annually by the facility’s Administrator. The facility’s last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 06/26/2025. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed one (1) staff and two (2) residents. All residents interviewed stated that facility staff treat them well and are attentive to their needs. No residents interviewed had concerns with the facility. The staff member interviewed was knowledgeable on their roles and responsibilities, resident rights, the different forms of abuse and the appropriate reporting procedures for suspected abuse. During today’s visit LPA obtained a copy of the facility’s updated LIC 500, resident roster, and liability insurance. No deficiencies were observed during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted. And a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2025
20241 state visit · 3 documents
Aug 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring that resident's hygiene needs are being met. Staff are not repositioning resident as necessary. Staff are not ensuring that resident is being fed in a safe manner. Staff are not ensuring that resident has clean bedding. Staff handle resident in a rough manner.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Emily Peraldi and Trevor Byrne conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility. At 9:35 a.m., the LPAs met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 9:36 a.m., the Administrator, Zaruhi Harutyunyan arrived at the facility. During today’s visit, between 9:37 a.m. and 10:48 a.m., the LPAs conducted a physical plant tour, a record review and interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff and five (5) residents. During the initial visit, on 03/27/2023 between 1:53 p.m. and 3:00 p.m., LPA Camara conducted a physical plant tour, reviewed records, conducted an interview with one (1) resident and the Administrator and conducted a phone interview with a witness. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegations: 1.) Staff are not ensuring that resident's hygiene needs are being met. The Department received a complaint on 03/22/2023 alleging that staff do not properly clean Resident #1 (R1). During the physical plant tours on 03/27/2023 and 08/21/2024, LPAs observed residents to be well groomed. Interviews with residents did not reveal any concerns with staff not meeting their hygiene needs. Interviews with staff and Administrator revealed that residents get bathed twice a week. Additionally interview with R1’s family member did not have any concerns regarding R1’s care and hygiene needs. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegations: 2.) Staff are not turning resident as necessary. The Department received a complaint on 03/22/2023 alleging that staff do not reposition Resident #1 (R1). Interviews with residents revealed that staff do reposition residents throughout the day. Interview with staff and Administrator revealed that staff reposition residents every two hours or as needed. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegations: 3.) Staff are not ensuring that resident is being fed in a safe manner. The Department received a complaint on 03/22/2023 alleging that staff do not ensure Resident #1 (R1) is positioned properly before eating to prevent any choking. Interviews with the Administrator revealed that staff do supervise R1 and other residents while eating. The Administrator stated that R1 and other residents can feed themselves, however, do require supervision for their safety. No concerns were brought up during resident interviews regarding supervision during meals. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Contiued on LIC 9099-C. Regarding the allegations: 4.) Staff are not ensuring that resident has clean bedding. The Department received a complaint on 03/22/2023 alleging that staff do not ensure Resident #1’s (R1’s) sheets are changed and cleaned. During the physical plant tours on 03/27/2023 and 08/21/2024, LPAs observed all residents’ beds with clean linens. Interviews with residents revealed that staff and clean change their linens daily and weekly. Staff interviews revealed that staff change linens as need which could be daily. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegations: 5.) Staff handle resident in a rough manner. The Department received a complaint on 03/22/2023 alleging that Staff #1 (S1) handled Resident #1 (R1) in a rough manner. Interviews with residents, including R1 revealed that staff including S1 are very gently with residents and had no complaints regarding staff. Additionally interview with R1’s family member did not have any concerns regarding R1’s care or staff. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230322095137
Aug 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident in soiled diapers for an extended period of time. Staff does not meet the needs of resident in a timely manner. Staff did not provide adequate food service to resident in care. Staff does not assist resident with transfers to wheelchair. Staff are unable to communicate with resident due to language barrier.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Emily Peraldi and Trevor Byrne conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility. At 9:35 a.m., the LPAs met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 9:36 a.m., Administrator Zaruhi Harutyunyan, arrived at the facility. During today’s visit, between 9:37 a.m. and 10:48 a.m., the LPAs conducted a physical plant tour, a record review and interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff and five (5) residents. During the initial visit, on 05/02/2024 between 12:50 p.m. and 2:20 p.m., LPA Peraldi conducted a physical plant tour, conducted interviews with three (3) residents and one (1) staff, the Administrator and with a resident’s family member. During the initial visit, the LPA also requested and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegations: 1.) Staff left resident in soiled diapers for an extended period of time. 2.) Staff does not meet the needs of resident in a timely manner. The Department received a complaint on 04/30/2024 alleging that staff did not change R1’s diaper in a timely manner leaving R1 in a soiled diaper for an extended period of time. During the physical plant tours on 05/02/2024 and 08/21/2024, LPAs did not observe any foul odors that may have indicated soiled diapers. LPAs observed pendants for each resident. Residents ring their pendant when they need to use the bathroom or if they need a diaper change. Interviews with staff and the Administrator revealed that staff change residents’ diapers 3 times a day or as needed. Interviews with residents reveal that staff do change their diapers as needed and do not leave residents with soiled diapers. Resident interviews revealed that staff do assist residents in a timely manner. Additionally interview with R1’s family member did not have any concerns regarding R1’s care. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegations. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: 3.) Staff did not provide adequate food service to resident in care. The Department received a complaint on 04/30/2024 alleging that Resident #1 (R1) was served cold soup. During the physical plant tours on 05/02/2024 and 08/21/2024, LPAs observed sufficient amount of perishable and nonperishable food. Interviews conducted with residents revealed that residents had no complaints regarding the food and stated that they enjoyed the food that is served. Interviews with staff revealed that staff cook food that residents prefer. Staff stated that they always include fruits, vegetables, and protein for each meal and or snacks. Administrator provided photos of various meals served to residents to the LPAs. Additionally interview with R1’s family member did not have any concerns regarding R1’s food service. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Regarding the allegation: 4.) Staff does not assist resident with transfers to wheelchair. The Department received a complaint on 04/30/2024 alleging that Resident #1 (R1) does not receive assistance with transfers to wheelchair. Interviews with residents revealed that staff do assist residents with transfers to wheelchair. Resident interviews revealed that staff assist with transfers to wheelchair daily or when requested. Interviews with staff revealed that residents get transferred to their wheelchairs for their meals, outdoor time and when residents request to do be on their wheelchairs. Additionally interview with R1’s family member did not have any concerns regarding R1’s care. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: 5.) Staff are unable to communicate with resident due to language barrier. The Department received a complaint on 04/30/2024 alleging that Staff #1 (S1) is unable to communicate with residents since S1’s primary language is not English. Interviews with residents revealed that staff, including S1, are able to properly communicate with residents and if there are issues, staff and S1 call the Administrator for assistance. Resident interviews did not reveal any concerns with staff and S1’s communication. The information obtained during the investigation did not include sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240430154047
Aug 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Trevor Byrne and Emily Peraldi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 09:35 AM. LPAs met with facility staff who contacted the facility administrator Zaruhi Harutyunyan. Facility administrator arrived to the facility at 09:36 AM Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. Beginning at 09:37 AM, the LPAs, along with facility administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: KITCHEN: The LPAs observed the kitchen area to be clean. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. LPAs observed a secured cabinet contain knives and other sharp objects. The LPAs observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and purchased on 06/12/2024. BEDROOMS: There are three (3) bedrooms in the facility; all are designated for resident use, and all are designated as dual occupancy rooms. LPAs and facility administrator toured all three (3) resident rooms. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Bedroom number one (1) is approved for a bedridden resident. Auditory alarms were observed to be functional on bedroom one’s (1’s) exit door. BATHROOMS: There are two (2) bathrooms at the facility. One (1) is designated as a resident restroom and one (1) is primarily used as a staff restroom. Both restrooms were observed to be clean and in good repair and all were equipped with nonskid surfaces. Grab bars were observed in the resident restroom shower and by the resident toilet, all were properly secured. The water temperature was measured between 110.1 and 113 degrees Fahrenheit, which is in compliance with regulation. Report Continued on LIC 809-C Continued from LIC 809-C COMMON AREAS: This includes the living room. LPAs observed the living room to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 10:00 a.m. and were functional at the time of the visit. OUTDOOR SPACE: The facility has one (1) emergency exit gate, LPAs observed clear passageways for emergency exit use. The facility has adequate seating for resident use. Cameras were observed by the front entrance to the facility. Five (5) sheds were observed to be properly secured, one (1) contained a washer and dryer as well as cleaning products. One (1) shed contained an adequate supply of emergency food and water. The remaining three (3) sheds contained additional supplies and cleaning chemicals. RECORD REVIEW: Record review began at 10:05 a.m. Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, TB tests, consent forms, and personal rights. Five (5) staff files were reviewed. All staff files contained the required documents and trainings. Six (6) resident files were reviewed. All resident files reviewed contained all required documentation. No deficiencies were observed during record review. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medications are stored centrally and securely in a filing cabinet located in the living room. Medications for three (3) residents were observed. All medications reviewed were documented properly on their centrally stored medication and destruction record sheet. No deficiencies were observed during medication review. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPAs reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Last emergency disaster drill was conducted 06/26/2024. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date and adequate. Report Continued on LIC 809-C Continued from LIC 809-C INTERVIEWS: LPAs interviewed one (1) staff and five (5) residents. All residents interviewed stated that the food was of good quality and is provided in sufficient amounts. All residents stated that staff treat them well and are attentive to their needs. The staff member interviewed was knowledgeable on their roles and responsibilities, resident rights, the different forms of abuse and the appropriate reporting procedures for suspected abuse. During today’s visit LPAs obtained a copy of the facility’s updated LIC500, resident roster, and liability insurance. No deficiencies were cited at the time of the visit. Exit interview conducted. And a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County