Savant of Woodland Hills

Allegation investigated: Due to staff neglect, resident sustained an injury due to a fall Staff did not provide medical attention to resident in a timely manner Staff administering medication to resident without consent from authorized representative

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. The LPA arrived at 11:46AM and met with Executive Director (ED) Kevan Sidney. Entrance interview conducted. On 05/18/2026, the LPA conducted an initial visit. Between 3:53PM and 4:18PM the LPA conducted a physical plant tour and reviewed and obtained pertinent documents. On 05/19/2026, additional documents were provided via email. On 08/04/2026, the LPA conducted a subsequent visit. Between 10:26AM and 12:41PM, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed one (1) resident and six (6) staff, and reviewed and obtained pertinent documents. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegations: “Due to staff neglect, resident sustained an injury due to a fall” and “Staff did not provide medical attention to resident in a timely manner” It was reported that due to staff neglect, Resident #1 (R1) sustained an open wound injury resulting from a fall and was not provided medical attention in a timely manner. Physician’s Report dated 10/25/2025 documented diagnoses including Alzheimer’s dementia, osteoarthritis, myalgia, and repeated falls. The report also noted R1 exhibited disorientation and a lack of hazard awareness. Resident Assessment dated 10/31/2025, indicated that R1 required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs) and was identified as a fall risk requiring observation and fall management. R1 also received home health services with a primary diagnosis of an unspecified open wound on the right lower leg and a secondary diagnosis of unspecified dementia. Interviews with staff revealed that R1 frequently attempted to stand and ambulate independently, which resulted in recurrent falls. Staff stated that R1 sustained minor bruising and skin tears to the legs and arm, which typically resembled minor scratches. Staff also reported that R1 often removed bandages applied to skin tears and that R1 was known to scratch and further irritate the wounds. Staff explained that R1 would be transported to the hospital following their falls if they experienced pain or suspected of hitting their head. Facility fall interventions included supervising residents in the activity room, redirecting behaviors, and providing activities to keep residents engaged. Staff stated that a 1:1 staff to resident ratio in the common areas had been effective with R1 due to restlessness; however, the facility was not equipped to maintain a 1:1 ratio. Staff #1 (S1) recalled an incident where R1 sustained a deeper skin tear on the elbow and was transported to the hospital but could not recall the date of occurrence. S1 was unsure what caused the injury but stated it could have resulted from any object within R1’s room during an attempt to get out of bed independently. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C The Department received a self-reported incident from the facility stating that on 01/12/2026 at approximately 3AM, R1 had an unwitnessed fall in their bedroom. R1 was observed with a skin tear on their right arm and left leg and subsequently transferred to the hospital via emergency services. Hospital records revealed that R1 was admitted to the emergency department at approximately 4:04AM. R1 was evaluated for a right forearm skin tear, received a wound dressing, and was provided new orders to irrigate the wound with saline. R1 was also evaluated and referred to general surgery for a right and left lower leg laceration before being discharged at approximately 7:12AM. On 01/19/2026, R1’s home health nurse observed that the right forearm skin tear appeared to require medical attention due to signs of an infection. Hospital records indicated that R1 was transported to urgent care by family and that the skin laceration was documented as approximately one (1) week old and fall related. The laceration measured approximately five centimeters (5 cm), was V-shaped, and had macerated edges. The laceration was irrigated with normal saline and R1 was referred to general surgery and wound care for further management. Although urgent care records noted that the wound had not been previously evaluated by medical staff before 01/19/2026, hospital records from 01/12/2026 confirmed that it had been evaluated and treated. Home health records did not document any treatment or observation of the right forearm skin tear before or after R1’s hospital visits. Facility Progress Notes did not document the unwitnessed fall on 01/12/2026 but did document R1’s return from the hospital with new medication orders the same day. Staff notes indicated that R1 remained stable in the following days, with home health’s observation of skin breakdown on R1’s right leg on 01/14/2026, an additional fall documented on 01/15/2026, and home health’s observation of an infected “right elbow” laceration. Home health records further documented skilled nursing visits completed approximately every two (2) days for wound care to R1’s lower extremities. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Based on interviews and record review, although R1 sustained a fall resulting in a skin laceration, there is insufficient evidence to prove the injury occurred due to staff neglect. Additionally, the facility took appropriate steps in contacting emergency services following the unwitnessed fall and observation of the skin laceration. Therefore, the allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegations: “Staff administering medication to resident without consent from authorized representative” It was reported that the facility administered Mirtazapine and Quetiapine Fumarate medications without authorization from R1’s family. Staff reported that R1’s medications were managed by R1’s family, who obtained all prescription orders and provided the orders to the facility. Staff indicated that R1’s medications were listed on their medical provider’s portal and that the family did not expect to be notified of each prescribed medication. Centrally stored medication and destruction records documented Mirtazapine 7.5MG was filled on 12/03/2025 and started on 12/04/2025 and Quetiapine Fumarate 25MG was filled on 01/12/2026 and started on 01/14/2026. Interview and documentation obtained from the prescribing pharmacy revealed that the pharmacy received telephonic prescriptions for both medications. Records indicated that Mirtazapine was prescribed by a physician and Quetiapine Fumarate was prescribed by a nurse practitioner with a Geriatric Psychiatry medical facility. Additionally, R1’s primary medical provider records showed that R1 had previously been prescribed Quetiapine Fumarate 25MG on 09/20/2025. Based on interview and record review, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the alleged violation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260518093949

Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting resident’s incontinence needs Staff are not keeping resident’s room clean, safe, and sanitary at all times Staff are not providing a signal system to residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegations. The LPA arrived at 10:11AM and met with the Business Office Director (BOD) Ariana Bashardoost. The Executive Director (ED) Kevan Sidney arrived at approximately 12:40PM. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 10:26AM, the LPA and BOD conducted a physical plant tour, and no immediate concerns were observed. Between 10:43AM and 12:41PM, the LPA interviewed one (1) resident and six (6) staff, and reviewed and obtained pertinent documents. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegations: “Staff are not meeting resident’s incontinence needs,” “Staff are not keeping resident’s room clean, safe, and sanitary at all times,” and “Staff are not providing a signal system to residents” It was reported that staff did not ensure a safe and sanitary living environment for Resident #1 (R1) due to Resident #2’s (R2) incontinence needs, which allegedly resulted in unaddressed accidents. It was further reported that R1 and R2 did not have access to a call system in their room and were unable to request staff assistance. Interview with R1 revealed that R2 required assistance from staff and that R1 frequently assisted R2 during the night. R1 acknowledged that it was disruptive but reported that they chose to assist R2 voluntarily and had no complaints. R1 stated they were able to use their call light but did not feel the need to because they were comfortable assisting R2. R1 reported that R2 had approximately two (2) incontinence accidents on the bedroom floor overnight and that R1 slipped once but did not fall. R1 stated that when they notified staff of R2’s accidents, staff responded immediately. R1 did not express any additional concerns and described staff as attentive to their needs. Per staff and record review, R2 was relocated by their family the week prior due to requiring a higher level of care and supervision. An interview with R2 was not conducted. Staff interviews indicated that R1 was mostly independent and often attempted to help other residents, including R2. Staff reported they frequently instructed R1 not to assist other residents and to notify staff instead. Staff stated that R2 had a history of aggressive behavior and was observed removing pull-ups, manipulating bowel movements, and intentionally urinating in their room and common areas. Staff indicated this behavior occurred more frequently when R2 was agitated and first moved into the facility. After staff became aware of the incidents – and following R1’s concern – staff implemented more frequent check-ins with R2. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Staff also stated that R2’s physician prescribed medication that helped reduce R2’s agitation and behaviors. Staff reported that during early morning rounds, they occasionally found incontinence accidents in the bedroom and immediately cleaned R2 and the room. Staff stated these incidents were not frequent and that they regularly communicated such occurrences to the overnight staff. Staff also reported that incontinence care is completed frequently for all residents, and that although R2 was monitored more closely, accidents could occur quickly. During today’s visit, the LPA observed R1’s bedroom and found no concerns. The room was clean, sanitary, and did not pose any safety or personal rights risks to R1. The LPA observed a call light accessible from R1’s bed. The call system was tested and found operational. Based on interviews and observations, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260727112440

Allegation investigated: Illegal Eviction Staff did not issue a refund to resident in care Staff did not follow proper reporting requirements Staff did not conduct a proper preplacement assessment of resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Ariana B. - Business Office Manager. The reason for the visit was explained. On 02/09/2026, Community Care Licensing Division received the above allegations. On 02/18/2026, LPA conducted the initial complaint visit and conducted a physical plant tour which included random resident rooms, and common areas. At approximately 11:45am LPA conducted interviews with staff, reviewed records and obtained copies of pertinent records. Additional staff interviewed at approximately 2pm. At approximately 2:45pm, LPA toured the facility and met with four (4) residents. Following is a summary of the allegations and investigation findings: Regarding allegation of “Illegal eviction and Staff did not issue a refund to resident in care” – It was reported that Resident #1 (R1) was 5150d because of behavioral issues and transferred to the hospital. (Continue) Unsubstantiated Information was received that on 1/15/2026, the resident was ready to be discharged from the hospital, but facility staff refused to accept the resident back to the facility and as a result R1 was transferred to a skilled nursing home. In addition, it was reported that R1 prepaid the month of January and staff refused to refund any money to R1. Staff interviewed denied that R1 was evicted or that a refund was refused. Interview with staff and records reviewed revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility on 12/30/2025; R1 exhibit aggressive behavior during the first week of admission. Staff reported that R1 would yell, push and hit staff. Interview with staff revealed that on 01/07/2026 R1 showed signs of aggression, pushing and hitting staff. Staff contacted paramedics and R1 was evaluated by the team and considered danger to self and others therefore R1 was transported to the hospital. According to the ED and staff they never received clearance for R1 to return. ED reported that R1 was not cleared to return to assisted living and was authorized/cleared for skilled nursing facility by the medical facility. Interview conducted with Case Manager from LA Downtown Medical Center and records reviewed confirmed that R1 was cleared to transfer to a skilled medical facility and therefore could not return to Savant of Woodland Hills. According to the Case Manager, since the responsible person for R1 did not want to transfer R1 to the skilled nursing facility operated by Savant the decision was made to transfer R1 to Driftwood Health Care by R1’s responsible person. Regarding the refund issues, LPA conducted interview with R1’s responsible person and it was confirmed that Savant of Woodland Hills did issue a refund for the payment made in January 2026. Based on the above information gathered, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations or that a violation occurred; therefore, the allegations “Illegal eviction and Staff did not issue a refund to resident in care” are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding allegation of “Staff did not follow proper reporting requirements” – Information was received that resident #1 sustained a fall and the responsible person for R1 did not know the full incident and did not receive a report of the fall incident. Interviews conducted with staff and records reviewed revealed that R1 moved in on 12/30/2024; R1 was present at the facility for approximately one week and had two fall incidents with no injuries. Records reviewed revealed R1 had a fall incident on 1/1/2026 and 1/6/2026 with no injuries – on 1/7/2026 R1 was aggressive with staff; danger to others therefore was 5150d. Records reviewed revealed that R1’s responsible person was contacted for both fall incidents and 5150 transfer. Staff interviewed stated that R1’s responsible person was provided with information on hand surrounding each incident and the ED kept in communication with R1’s responsible person following R1’s 5150 transfer. (Continue to LIC9099c) Based on the above information gathered, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations or that a violation occurred; therefore, the allegation “Staff did not follow proper reporting requirements” is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding allegation of “Staff did not conduct a proper assessment of resident” – Information was received that staff “Sofia” conducted the assessment of R1 prior to admission and according to reporting party staff did not talk to the resident and completed the assessment by talking to the nursing staff at the skilled nursing home only. Interview conducted with staff revealed that prior to R1 moving in on 12/30/2025, R1 was assessed at the skilled nursing home; staff met with R1 and the nursing staff at the skilled nursing facility. Staff interviewed and records reviewed revealed that facility did conduct a preplacement assessment prior to move-in; a resident appraisal was also completed on 1/3/2026. Staff Sofia Zaretsky stated that she did meet with R1 and the nursing staff at the skilled nursing facility to conduct the assessment prior to admission. Staff reported that from her observation and the records she reviewed R1 was compatible for assisted living. However, within one-week R1 started showing signs of aggression, was unable to toilet self and was non-compliant with staff and taking medications. According to staff R1’s condition changed rapidly because R1 was non-compliant with care and medications; physician and responsible person were updated with R1’s condition. Staff reported that despite continued efforts to assist R1 with care R1 continued to be aggressive and non-compliant with care. On 01/07/2026 R1 became very aggressive with staff and was observed to be a danger to self and others; R1 was evaluated by medical team and transferred to LA Downtown Medical Center for further evaluation. Based on the above information gathered, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations or that a violation occurred; therefore, the allegation “Staff did not conduct a proper assessment of resident” is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview held. Copy of report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260209081841

Allegation investigated: Staff did not take resident to medical appointment Resident accrued an unauthorized charge that was due to staff negligence

**This report was amended to include additional information** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Kevan Siddney. The reason for the visit was explained. On 01/09/2026, Community Care Licensing Division received the above allegations. On 01/14/2026, LPA conducted an initial complaint visit to this facility. Upon arrival LPA was greeted by staff. LPA met with ED and reason for the visit was explained and allegations were discussed. At approximately 2:45pm, LPA conducted interview with staff. At approximately 3:15pm, LPA toured the facility, interviewed five (5) random residents and reviewed records. In addition, interview was conducted with other potential witnesses. Following is a summary of the allegations and investigation finding: Regarding allegations: Staff did not take resident to medical appointment and Resident accrued an unauthorized charge that was due to staff negligence: (Continue to 9099c) Unsubstantiated It was reported that resident #1 missed a scheduled medical appointment due to staff negligence. Information was received that R1 receives an injection for cancer every 3 weeks at a medical facility and this injection keeps the resident from having diarrhea which is caused by the cancer. Reporting party (RP) stated that the appointments are scheduled by family and the facility’s driver takes R1 to these appointments. According to the RP, recently, the staff forgot to take the resident to the medical appointment for the injection. Since R1 did not receive the injection, the resident had diarrhea for many weeks and as a result facility reported that R1’s level of care will increase service fee of $1250.00 a month more. Resident records reviewed revealed that R1 moved into the facility in 2023. R1’s care service level is level 2; needs and services plan dated 12/23/2025 indicates R1’s level of care need for bathing enhanced to twice a week shower/bathing with 2 persons assist; toileting needs was moderate – standby assists. Records reviewed and staff interviews revealed that increase in R1’s level of care services was communicated to R1’s family/responsible person. Staff confirmed that R1’s increase in fees was a result of R1’s enhanced service needs. Attempt was made to interview R1 however R1 was not present at the facility during LPA’s visit on 01/14/2026, 01/30/2026 and 02/18/2026. Interviews conducted and records reviewed revealed that R1’s medical appointments are managed/scheduled by the family; facility provides transportation only.Staff reported that after the 12/5/2026 medical appointment they were notified by the medical facility where R1 receives the injection for the medical condition every three weeks would require personal assistance during the medical appointment. It was agreed that family would accompany R1 to the next medical appointment. Staff reported that the reason R1 missed the medical appointment in the month of 12/2025 was due to R1’s family not being able to attend. In addition, R1 and family were responsible for managing medical appointments and arrange for transportation. Records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff revealed that R1 was provided transportation by the facility to two medical appointments which were scheduled for 12/05/2025 and another on 12/26/2025. Staff confirmed that these appointments were known and scheduled with the facility in advance and R1 was assisted and provided transportation to and from the medical appointments. No other medical appoint was recorded or scheduled with the facility for R1. Reporting party did not provide any evidence to support that facility was notified of scheduled medical appointment. Based on the above information gathered, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations or that a violation occurred; therefore, the allegations “Staff did not take resident to medical appointment” and “Resident accrued an unauthorized charge that was due to staff negligence” are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260109083855

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure food served to residents is of good quality Staff does not ensure residents receive adequate care in a timely manner Staff does not ensure resident is accorded respect in relationships with other residents Licensee does not ensure all staff are able to communicate with residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. LPA met with staff and explained reason for the visit. Staff contacted Executive Director (ED) Kevan Sidney and the reason for the visit was explained. On 11/13/2025, Community Care Licensing Division received information regarding the above allegations. On 11/20/2025, LPA conducted a complaint visit to initiate the investigation for the above allegations. Beginning at approximately 5:55pm, LPA met with staff discussed allegations. LPA toured the facility kitchen, dining and common areas. LPA also conducted interviews with (2) random residents in the common areas. Staff contacted Executive Director Kevan Sidney and LPA discussed the allegations over the phone with the ED. Additional residents and staff were interviewed during subsequent visits made on 1/14/2026 from approximately 2:30pm-4:30pm, 1/30/2026 from approximately 10:30am-12:30am and 2/18/2026 from approximately 2pm-3pm. (Continue to LIC9099c) Unsubstantiated Following is the summary of the allegations and investigation finding: Regarding allegation: “Staff does not ensure food served to residents is of good quality” Information was received that the food quality is terrible and the food servers give terrible customer service. No other detail was provided. During the initial visit and subsequent visits, facility kitchen and dining was toured; total of eight (8) random residents and four staff were interviewed. LPA was provided with a copy of the facility menu. During subsequent visits to the facility, LPA observed a sufficient supply of non-perishable and perishable food supply. The supply of perishable and nonperishable food observed found it to be in good condition and of substantial variety. The LPA observed a variety of meats, fish, fruits, and vegetables. Eight (8) of eight random residents interviewed reported to be very satisfied with the facility, food quality and quantity. Interviews revealed that if a resident does not like a meal, they are offered a different option. In general, interviews revealed minimal complaints as it pertains to food quality and adequate food service. LPA spoke with the reporting party (RP) on 2/18/2026 and it was mentioned that they are satisfied with the food quality and service at this time. Based on observation and interview, although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred, therefore the allegation “Staff does not ensure food served to residents is of good quality” is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding allegation: “Staff does not ensure residents receive adequate care in a timely manner”: Information was received that a resident (name unknown) screamed for help for several hours (date unknown) and the facility staff didn’t respond. In addition, it was reported that the front desk staff don't answer the phones at night and just let the phone ring. LPA attempted to speak with the RP however RP declined and stated that “everything is ok”. Staff interviewed denied the allegation and reported that the front desk phone is answered day/night and they have not had any issues reported by residents. Staff reported that the residents are checked regularly at least every 2hrs by staff on each shift. Eight (8) out of eight (8) residents interviewed expressed being satisfied with care service and availability of staff in the community. Residents interviewed did not report any issues with reaching front desk staff at night. Based on observation and interview, although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred, therefore the allegation “Staff does not ensure residents receive adequate care in a timely manner” is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. (Continue to LIC9099c) Regarding allegation “Staff does not ensure resident is accorded respect in relationships with other residents”: Information was received that residents’ turn the volume on the TV up really high and it keeps other residents up all night. It was also stated that the staff in the kitchen ignore residents when they ask for their food. LPA attempted to speak with the RP about this allegation however RP declined and stated that “everything is ok”. Staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated that majority of the residents in the assisted living side get along well and respect each other; staff reported that if there were an issue residents would speak up. Staff reported that there are residents who are challenging but are respectful to each other and keep things neutral. Staff stated that they have not had any issues reported by any residents at this time. Eight (8) out of eight (8) residents interviewed reported no mistreatment. Based on observation and interview, although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred, therefore the allegation “Staff does not ensure resident is accorded respect in relationships with other residents” is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding allegation “Licensee does not ensure all staff are able to communicate with residents”: Information was received that several of the care staff don't speak or understand fluent English. LPA attempted to speak with the RP about this allegation however RP declined and stated that “everything is ok”. Staff interviews consist of direct care staff, housekeeping staff and kitchen staff. All were able to demonstrate understanding questions asked and were able to converse with LPA. Eight (8) out of eight (8) residents interviewed reported no issues with communicating with staff. No complaints received about communicating issues with staff. Based on observation and interview, although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred, therefore the allegation “Licensee does not ensure all staff are able to communicate with residents” is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interviewed conducted and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2026 · control 29-AS-20251113083532

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident's prescribed medication is filled.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Martha Arroyo conducted an initial complaint visit to investigate the allegation noted above. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Kevan Sidney and the reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview. During today’s visit, approximately between 09:10 a.m. and 11:10 a.m., the LPA conducted interviews with the ED, three staff members and seven residents, conducted a file review and a medication review of three randomly selected residents, and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report Continued on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated Report Continued from LIC 9099C... It was alleged that staff does not ensure resident's prescribed medication is filled. It was reported that pain medication had been prescribed for the resident; however, the resident had not yet received the medication. A review of R1’s physician’s report dated 09/17/2025 lists the primary diagnoses as metabolic encephalopathy, emphysema, protein-calorie malnutrition, alcohol dependence, immunodeficiency, GERD, repeated falls, depression, neuropathy, and cannabis abuse. According to the report, R1 is able to care for their own personal needs, including bathing, dressing/grooming, feeding, managing toileting needs, managing personal cash resources, communicating their needs, following directions and instructions, and leaving the facility unsupervised. R1’s routine medication list includes Gabapentin 300 mg, one capsule by mouth three times daily; Aspirin EC 81 mg, one tablet by mouth once daily; and Lidocaine 4% patch, applied to the affected area for 12 hours once daily for pain. According to the medication review, R1’s routine medications are being administered as prescribed. Additionally, R1 has PRN medications that include Acetaminophen 325 mg, take two tablets by mouth every four hours as needed for pain, and Ibuprofen 800 mg, take one tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. However, according to the medication review, Ibuprofen has only been administered six (6) times since it was filled on 02/17/2026. An interview conducted with R1 revealed that they are currently taking Gabapentin for neuropathy pain. Although they experience pain and are aware that PRN pain medications are available, they prefer not to take them because they feel the medications take too long to take effect. Interviews conducted with staff revealed that R1 does have PRN pain medications prescribed; however, the resident does not request the medication to be administered when staff assist with routine medications. Staff also reported that all prescriptions are sent directly from the prescribing physician’s office to the pharmacy and then delivered to the facility. Furthermore, seven out of seven residents interviewed reported no concerns regarding their medications. Based on the information obtained and reviewed, the Department has insufficient evidence to say the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, allegation “staff does not ensure resident's prescribed medication is filled” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260304162151

Allegation investigated: Staff did not adequately supervise a resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Martha Arroyo conducted an initial complaint visit to investigate the allegation noted above. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Kevan Sidney and the reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview. During today’s visit, approximately between 09:10 a.m. and 11:15 a.m., the LPA observed the dining room area, conducted interviews with the ED, three staff members and seven residents, and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report Continued on LIC 9099C.. Unsubstantiated Report Continued from LIC 9099... It was alleged that staff did not adequately supervise a resident in care. It was reported that a resident went into the dining room and pulled out their genitalia in front of the residents. Records reviewed and interviews conducted revealed that there have been no reported incidents of residents exhibiting inappropriate behavior within the facility, specifically in the dining room. The ED reported that the facility is currently fully staffed, and that servers are present in the dining room to assist residents during mealtimes. Interviews conducted with residents indicated that they have not observed any residents engaging in inappropriate behavior while dining in the dining room. Residents further reported that staff are present in the dining room at all times during meal service. Additionally, seven out of seven residents interviewed reported no concerns regarding staffing levels or their living conditions at the facility. Based on the information obtained through interviews and record review, the Department has insufficient evidence to say the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, allegation “staff did not adequately supervise a resident in care” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260309170538

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that the residents’ room was kept free of pests

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Kevan Sidney. The reason for the visit was explained. On 10/08/2025, Community Care Licensing Division received the above allegation. It was reported that residents’ room were infested with cockroaches and when reported to management there was no follow-through with any pest control service for weeks. On 10/15/2025, LPA conducted a complaint visit to investigate the allegation listed above. At approximately 3:15pm, LPA toured the facility common areas, interviewed residents and toured four (4) random resident rooms (108, 113, 114 and 115) with staff. In addition, copies of records pertinent to the investigation was requested and provided by ED. (Continue to LIC9099c) Unsubstantiated On 10/20/2025, LPA conducted a subsequent complaint visit and at approximately 1:45pm, LPA toured the facility with staff and interviewed eight (8) random residents. One out of twelve residents interviewed reported bug activity in their room. This resident did mention that the facility did provide assists; offered to switch rooms and provide pest control service for their room. Resident reported that they haven’t seen any bugs yet. Resident shared that they keep food items sealed in bags and boxes and so far no bug activity observed. Other residents interviewed denied any bed bug activity in their room at this time. Staff interviewed reported that the facility is contracted with Orkin pest control for monthly service and more frequently if needed. Staff reported that resident rooms are inspected by maintenance staff for any issues and the exterminator is contacted anytime bug activity is reported/seen. Executive Director provided records and invoices from Orkin Pest Control for the last two months confirming general pest (bug) prevention treatment conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, documentation and interviews confirmed the facility is making a continuous effort to keep the facility free from pests and insects at this time. Therefore, based on information gathered the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026 · control 29-AS-20251008150341

Allegation investigated: Staff do not respond to resident's calls for assistance in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Kevan Sidney. The reason for the visit was explained. On 10/17/2025, Community Care Licensing Division received the above allegation. It was reported that staff do not respond to residents’ call for assistance timely; resident reported that it took staff over 30 minutes to respond. On 10/20/2025, LPA conducted a complaint visit to investigate the allegation above. Beginning at approximately 1:45pm, LPA toured the facility with staff and interviewed eight (8) random residents. LPA also interviewed staff and obtained relevant documents. Regarding allegation: Staff not providing assistance to resident in a timely manner. (Continue to LIC9099c) Substantiated Resident interviews revealed 6 of 8 interviewed residents stated they do sometimes wait for extended periods of time for staff to respond. LPA interviews with staff revealed that staff are expected to respond to resident calls for assistance within 5-10 minutes. Staff reported that there are times that residents have to wait for extended periods of time to receive assistance since staff are helping other residents. Staff also stated that the call system does not always function properly, sometimes losing signal and other times they forget to follow through with re-setting residents pendant/alert devices. Review of facility call system records for resident calls from 09/2025-10/2025 revealed pendant calls with response times varying from 5 minutes to over 60+ minutes. Based on interviews conducted and record review, at this time the above allegation was found to be substantiated, there is a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. See 9099-D for deficiencies. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were issued. The supply of perishable and nonperishable food observed found it to be adequate and of substantial variety. The LPA observed a variety of meats, fruits, vegetables, grains, and liquids. The facility had a variety of both hot and cold meal options. Eight (8) of eight random residents interviewed reported to be very satisfied with the facility food quality and quantity. Interviews revealed that if a resident does not like a meal, they are offered a different option. In general, interviews revealed minimal complaints as it pertains to adequate food service. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that "Staff do not provide adequate food service". This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026 · control 29-AS-20251017122035

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468(a)2 · Plan of correction due date: Jan 16, 2026

PERSONAL RIGHTS:(a)Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. 7 of 8 residents stated they wait over 30 to 60 minutes for staff to respond when pendant or call system is activated. Facility call system records reviewed for 9/2025- 10/2025 revealed pendant calls withthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026

Plan of correction: Executive Director will submit a written plan to ensure residents are assisted in a timely manner. response times varying from 5 minutes to over 60+ minutes

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Brian Balisi and Martha Arroyo arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at approx 9:18 a.m. Upon arrival LPAs met with Executive Director Kevan Sidney and explained the reason for the visit. At approx 10:00a.m. , LPAs toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. LPA began the inspection in the kitchen/food service area. Knives are kept inaccessible to residents in care. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. Facility dining room and commercial kitchen were inspected and found to be in compliance with Title 22 regulations. The LPAs observed sufficient perishable and non-perishable foods to meet the minimum two-day and seven-day supply of food and water. Refrigerator and food pantry were checked for proper labels and expiration dates and food labels had expiration date clearly marked. LPA inspected the common areas throughout the facility. The common areas include the following on the first floor a library, multi-purpose/activity room, dining room, bistro, and the auditorium. On the second floor is the memory care area with patio, 2 sitting/living rooms. All the rooms have been appropriately furnished. The common areas were observed to be properly furnished and relatively clean at the of the visit. There is a dedicated area for the posting of required documents directly by the main entrance and hallway. Fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility, fully charged and were last serviced 03/08/2025. All exits in Memory care have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. Facility has four stairwells, LPAs observed each stairwell with an evacuation chair. LPAs inspected ten (10) randomly selected bedrooms in memory care and assisted living. The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with a bed, night stand, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens. LPA observed all bathrooms in each resident bedroom were clean, properly supplied and had functional fixtures. The hot water was measured in each bathroom within 105 - 115 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident bathrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. Records review six (6) resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to: appraisals, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. Six (6) Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All records reviewed were in order at the time of the visit. Daily vehicle inspection list and California Highway Patrol Inspection report was reviewed for facility vehicles Medications review. The medications are centrally stored in a med room on the third floor inaccessible to residents in care. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. Medications were observed to be given as prescribed at the time of the visit. Infection Control / Emergency Disaster Planning: During today’s visit, the LPAs reviewed the facility's infection control policy as well as their emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as they pertain to infection control are adequate at this time. Daily vehicle inspection list and California Highway Patrol Inspection report was reviewed for facility vehicles. The last fire alarm system inspection was completed on 08/21/2025 and was found to be in compliance with Fire Code Regulations at the time of visit. The last Wet Sprinkler system was completed on 05/21/2025 and was found to be in compliance with Fire Code Regulations at the time of the visit. Emergency disaster drills conducted quarterly as per regulation; last disaster drill conducted on 12/07/2025. LPAs obtained the following documents: Census, Staff schedule, Emergency Disaster plan, Fire Extinguisher, carbon monoxide, and sprinkler test records and updated Limited Liability insurance. Last disaster drill was conducted this month. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and report issued to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2025

Allegation investigated: Staff did not document changes to resident's condition. Staff did not obtain consent prior to moving resident into the memory care unit.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Sofiya Zaretsky, Wellness Director. The reason for the visit was explained. On 04/28/2025, Community Care Licensing Division received the above allegations. On 05/07/2025, LPA conducted the initial complaint visit and conducted a physical plant tour which included random resident rooms, and common areas. From approximately (approx.)11am -1pm LPA interviewed six (6) residents and two (2) staff. Between 1pm-2:45pm LPA reviewed resident records and facility daily communication logs. In addition, on 05/02/2025 at approximately 3:45pm LPA conducted interview with potential witness. Following is a summary of the allegations and investigation finding. Regarding allegations “Staff did not document changes to resident's condition and Staff did not obtain consent prior to moving resident into the memory care unit”: (Continue to LIC9099c) Unsubstantiated It was reported that Resident #1 (R1) was moved to the memory care without documenting changes to the resident’s condition or notifying the residents responsible person. It was also mentioned that this transition was done without any prior notice or consent from the family. Records reviewed confirmed R1 resided in the Assisted Living unit since 08/2020. Facility documentation showed that R1 began showing signs of cognitive decline, aggression and wandering behavior beginning in 01/2025 – 03/2025. Records reviewed revealed documentation of events leading up to R1’s move on 04/09/2025 to the memory care unit which is a secured unit with approved delayed egress exits. According to the ED and Health and Wellness Director it was unsafe for R1 to continue living in the AL due to R1’s increased confusion and exit seeking behavior. Staff interviews revealed that everything was communicated with R1, R1’s family and R1’s responsible person. Staff confirmed that R1 was able to speak english however was incoherent. Records reviewed and interviews conducted confirmed that R1’s family was aware of the move and R1’s responsible person signed the admission agreement (04/09/2025). Interview with R1’s responsible person revealed that they were aware of R1’s cognitive decline and the facility did communicate their observation of the change in R1’s condition. It was also confirmed that R1’s responsible person was aware of the necessary transfer and agreed to the transfer for R1’s safety. Based on the above information gathered, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations or that a violation occurred; therefore, the allegations “Staff did not document changes to resident's condition and Staff did not obtain consent prior to moving resident into the memory care unit” are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250428061537

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian arrived at the facility to conduct a Pre-Licensing visit at the proposed facility site. Upon arrival LPA met with Applicant Representative/Administrator Kevan Sidney and Savant of Woodland Hills - Vice President Nirjara Acharaya. This is a change of ownership application from Commons at Woodland Hills, The to Savant of Woodland Hills - A Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with requested capacity of 322 residents. The facility is currently operating as Commons at Woodland Hills #197609641 with a current census of 103. At 11:30am a tour of the physical plant was conducted. The Facility consist of a single building with three (3) levels. The Facility is equipped with climate control central air and heating (75*F at the time of visit today). KITCHEN: The facility is equipped with a kitchen that is supplied with adequate dining and cook ware. Sufficient supplies of perishable and nonperishable food observed. Appliances and fixtures observed clean and functional. The walk-in refrigerator observed at 40 degrees and walk-in freezer at 0 degrees. They have a dishwashing machine that is used to clean the dishes. Emergency food storage and supplies observed on the 2nd floor. BEDROOMS: There are 161 resident units total in assisted living side, with 12 rooms that are shared in the memory care area. The memory care rooms are 201 - 211 and 226- 240. There is a delayed egress door to both entrances to the memory care unit with a 15 second delay and key code entry. LPA observed the following resident rooms #103, 108, 115, 208, 210, 336, 310, 315, 325, and 317; all rooms observed appropriately furnished. All bedrooms were supplied with all required bedding and linens. There is sufficient lighting as well as closet and drawer space available. All resident bathrooms are properly equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats/strips for shower and walk in tubs. Hot water in the resident rooms was between 111.5-114.5 degrees Fahrenheit . All bathrooms are properly equipped with grab bars in the shower / walk in tub and by the toilet. The resident rooms have emergency pull cord system - pull cords tested during visit. COMMON AREAS: These include the following on the first floor a library, multi-purpose / activity room, dinning room, hydration area, and the auditorium. On the second floor has the memory care area with patio, dining and activity area. The third floor has additional resident rooms. All the rooms have been appropriately furnished. There is a dedicated area for the posting of required documents directly by the main entrance and hallway. The facility has a fire alarm and sprinkler system in place. The facility smoke alarm system is hard wired and last tested on 11/7/2024 by Taasco Co.. All fire extinguishers are fully charged and last serviced on 03/08/2024. The facility has no fountain or swimming pool. There are no bodies of water. BATHROOMS: There are several common bathrooms. The first floor has 2 bathrooms along the main hallway. The second floor has 1 bathroom located in the memory care unit. The third floor bathroom is along the main hallway by the elevator. LAUNDRY ROOM / PARKING AREA / STORAGE: There is a laundry room located next to the kitchen. There are two laundry areas, the one with industrial washers and dryer that the facility staff use. There is also a smaller laundry area is equipped with 2 washers and 2 dryers for resident use. The staff break room is located next to the laundry rooms. There is no garage but there is limited parking at the back of the facility (north side). SURROUNDING GROUNDS: The property is equipped with gates west side of the building. There is no gate on the east side of the building leading to the parking area. MEDICATION ROOM: Is located on the third floor and is locked and inaccessible to the residents. The room is also equipped with several first kits. FACILITY RECORDS: The facility records are kept in the office for both residents and staff members. The medication room also has resident records pertaining to health care needs. Comp III conducted with the Administrator. This report will be sent to the Centralized Application Bureau (CAB). You will be notified by the CAB Analyst when your license has been approved. You are not allowed to begin operating until you have been notified that your license has been approved by the CAB Analyst. Failure to comply could affect approval of your license. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2024

Type of visit: Office

COMP II by CAB successfully completed Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 322 Census (if any clients in care): 103 Method: Telephone call with CAB COMP II Participants:Kevan Sidney, Administrator; Adam Zenou, Owner; Shannon Betker, analyst. Applicant/administrator participated in COMP II at CAB via telephone call with analyst at CAB. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified by confirming driver's license number. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed the understanding of Title 22. Component II was successfully completed. Applicant and administrator were advised to email/fax signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID to CAB. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2024