Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Royal Oaks Inn

Large community·Licensed for 80·Thousand Oaks, California

Licensed since 2019Licence #567609831
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$4,195 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 80Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit50 of 80 beds occupiedAugust 22, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJune 17, 2026CDSS inspection record

Royal Oaks Inn is a large care community in Thousand Oaks — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 80 residents since 2019. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Royal Oaks Inn

Is Royal Oaks Inn licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Royal Oaks Inn licensed for?

80 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Royal Oaks Inn been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Royal Oaks Inn still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Royal Oaks Inn cost?

$4,195 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 20 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,962 to $4,995 a month, and the middle figure is $4,685 (n = 20 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Royal Oaks Inn take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Ocean Group Holdings, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Thousand Oaks Surgical Hosp., A Campus of Los Robles Hosp. & Medical Ctr. is 1.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Royal Oaks Inn keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Royal Oaks Inn license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ROYAL OAKS INN”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #567609831. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 80 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Ocean Group Holdings, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 80 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 80 NON-AMBULATORY. ALL BEDROOMS APPROVED FOR NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 20.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$4,195a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$4,195a month

Likely $4,195–$4,795

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,195this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,195–$4,795
$4,195
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,195–$8,300
$6,195
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.

13 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,850–$6,350.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 45 Erbes Rd, Thousand Oaks, CA 91362Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated October 8, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
11
Most recent visit
June 17, 2026
Occupied · August 22, 2025 visit
50 of 80 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 6 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated August 11, 2021 to August 22, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 6 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints5typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20253302024450202311020222202021221

The last 36 months — 9 of 13 documents

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Angela Barutyan and Quoc Huynh arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 10AM. Upon arrival, LPAs met with Administrator Holly Gold and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 10:04AM, the LPAs, along with the Administrator, toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: KITCHEN: At 10:04AM, LPAs toured the kitchen. The kitchen is kept inaccessible to residents. Knives and sharps were stored inaccessible to residents. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Emergency food and water supply is stored in a locked storage room. COMMON AREAS: The common areas include two (2) lounges, two (2) outdoor patios, dining room, activity room, beauty salon, and book nook. LPAs observed required postings throughout the common areas. Common areas were observed to be properly furnished with enough seating to accommodate residents and had a screened fireplace. Fire extinguishers throughout the facility were fully charged and last serviced 05/19/2025. Fire system devices are tested annually by Perfect Connections and were tested 06/10/2025. BEDROOMS: LPAs inspected five (5) randomly selected bedrooms. Resident bedrooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. At 10:17AM, LPAs observed baseboards in room 38 in disrepair. Administrator stated that baseboards will be repaired or replaced. Report Continued on LIC 809. LPAs observed two (2) rooms with missing window shade panels. Administrator stated that panels will be repaired. BATHROOMS: Resident bathrooms are shared between rooms with door access from each. Some bedrooms have private bathrooms that are not shared. LPAs observed bathrooms in each resident bedroom to be clean and properly supplied with functional grab bars and fixtures. LPAs observed pull cords by the toilet. Hot water was measured in four (4) bathrooms and were between 108.9-118.8 degrees F, which is within the required range. There are eight (8) shower rooms, however, four (4) are in use. Shower rooms were observed to be clean, sanitary, in operating condition with slip-resistant surfaces, and sufficiently stocked with linens and personal hygiene supplies. MEDICATION REVIEW: LPAs began medication review at 10:35AM and reviewed medications for three (3) residents. Medications are centrally stored in the medication room by the business office. Medications are prepped up to 24 hours in advance in medication cups. All medications reviewed were stored and documented per regulation. RECORDS REVIEW: Beginning at 11:08AM, LPAs reviewed five (5) personnel and five (5) residents files for documents including but not limited to: resident Admission Agreement, resident physician’s report, TB test, health screening, staff training and fingerprint clearance. All five resident files reviewed were in compliance with regulation at the time of the visit. LPAs observed one (1) staff member without a criminal record clearance. Administrator stated that the staff member will obtain a criminal record clearance and will not provide care until cleared. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today's visit, LPAs reviewed the facility's infection control policy as well as the emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster plan is updated annually as required. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly as is required, with the last drill conducted on 07/17/2025. During today’s visit, LPAs obtained a copy of the facility’s liability insurance. Pursuant to Title 22, CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Civil penalty was issued in the amount of $500 for criminal record clearance. Administrator was informed that failure to correct deficiency may result in additional civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, report issued, and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2025

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Aug 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not address an outbreak of scabies in the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA arrived at 11:00AM and met with Administrator Brandon Jakobovich. Entrance interview conducted. On 07/28/2025, the LPA interviewed three (3) Staff, three (3) Hospice Agency Staff, attempted one (1) resident interview, reviewed and obtained pertinent documents, and toured the physical plant. During today’s visit, the LPA and Building Manager conducted a safety check tour at 11:30AM. No immediate concerns were observed. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: “Staff did not address an outbreak of scabies in the facility.” It was reported that Resident #1 (R1) had scabies, and the facility did not address the matter. It was alleged that R1 had neighboring residents – Resident #2 (R2) and Resident #3 (R3) – who also had scabies and persistent rashes that resulted in R1 contracting scabies. Record review revealed that R2 was admitted to the facility with persistent rashes that was actively treated by the facility and hospice. On 03/06/2025, R2 was prescribed Ivermectin for itching and on 06/16/2025 they were prescribed Permethrin and treated for scabies. Administrator Holly Gold stated that infection protocols were followed and R2’s condition subsided. Records confirmed R2 did not have any skin issues in July 2025. R3 was admitted to the facility with wound care addressed by hospice and prescribed Hydrocortisone with no documentation of rashes. R1 was diagnosed with skin cancer and reported by Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) to have very fragile skin due to R1’s age and condition. S2 stated R1 had recurrent skin issues that were addressed and treated accordingly and due to autoimmune and inflammation episodes, had on and off again rashes. The Reporting Party (RP) initially reported scabies in November 2024 to which the facility staff denied the observation. However, the facility and hospice proceeded to treat R1’s rashes with scabies medication. They observed the medications and Aquaphor were not effective and switched to Triamcinolone ointment. The Triamcinolone was observed to work well and R1’s rashes improved. The RP was persistent with the alleged scabies outbreak to which they had R1 undergo a scrape test through UCLA Health on 03/04/2025 and the test returned negative. The RP reported that in April to May 2025, R1’s rash came back. Record review and interview with Hospice staff confirmed that during this time, R1 transferred hospice agencies and was no longer prescribed Triamcinolone. Once R1 was received the ointment again, the rashes improved. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C The RP stated they addressed the scabies to the facility several times and did not observe the facility make any changes. Between 06/23/2025 and 07/02/2025, S2 conducted staff in-service training and addressed topics including resident rights, bruises, skin breakdown, and infection control and personal protective equipment (PPE) protocols. On 07/14/2025, Purcor Pest Solutions visited and treated all areas of the facility. Between 04/24/2025 and 07/23/2025, Purcor Pest Solutions reported zero (0) pest activity. The LPA also observed PPE placed outside R1’s unit for contingency measures for the alleged outbreak. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250723103455
Jan 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that infection control practices are maintained

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Barutyan arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint investigation with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegation listed above at 01:37PM. LPA met with Licensee Brandon Jakobovich. Reason for the visit was explained. During the initial visit on 12/09/2024, LPA conducted a brief physical plant tour, conducted interviews with four (4) staff members, two (2) staff from outside agencies, and three (3) residents, reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation, and discussed allegation with Administrator Gold and Licensee Jakobovich. It was alleged that the infection control practices are not maintained at the facility as Resident #1 (R1) contracted possible scabies. The complainant alleges that R1 had chronic skin irritation, believed to be scabies, while residing at the facility which cleared after R1 moved out. Interviews conducted with R1’s responsible parties explained that three (3) members began exhibiting skin irritation symptoms after visiting the facility. Per responsible parties, symptoms of the visitors and R1 cleared after using a Permethrin treatment, a topical medication used to treat scabies and head lice. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated However, it was also stated that R1 and other members were seen by multiple doctors, including at least two (2) dermatologists, and that a biopsy of R1’s skin was collected, all of which did not result in a scabies diagnosis. It was further stated that R1’s skin condition differed from the other members and that R1’s skin condition began and ended on the same timeline as one of R1’s medications; responsible parties also speculate that R1’s condition could have been an allergic reaction to the medication used during the same time as the skin condition. Responsible parties further stated that not all visiting members contracted the skin condition that the three (3) members did and that it is still unclear what the skin condition could have been as there were no official diagnoses and scabies was never confirmed. During the initial visit, LPA observed and interviewed the three (3) residents at the facility who had varying skin conditions or rashes. LPA observed the resident’s rooms, checked mattresses, bed covers, and pillows, and observed residents’ skin. The rashes observed by LPA differed from each other and did not resemble R1’s skin condition. LPA did not observe any indications of bed bugs, lice, or other such parasitic insects in residents’ rooms. LPA interviewed staff who stated that at no point did they have symptoms of scabies or skin irritation after caring for residents and that no skin-related outbreaks have occurred at the facility. Online research states that scabies mites can be transmitted by direct skin-to-skin contact with an infected person, however, no staff members or other residents exhibited scabies symptoms or symptoms similar to R1. LPA also reviewed the facility’s infection control policy and interviewed the Licensee and Administrator who were knowledgeable in infectious disease prevention and control. No concerns were noted. The facility has handled recent unrelated outbreaks by following proper procedure and protocol. No evidence of past scabies or skin-related outbreaks were confirmed. Licensee and Administrator stated that a chemical sheet for the facility was pulled for review for possible irritants to R1, and that R1’s responsible parties were informed that alternative soaps, shampoos, detergents, and lotions could be provided for facility staff to use on R1, as there were concerns of irritants in the products. Per Licensee and Administrator, no staff or other residents contracted anything resembling scabies at any point. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation “Licensee does not ensure that infection control practices are maintained” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2025 · control 29-AS-20241206113504
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Barutyan conducted a Case Management - Deficiencies visit in conjunction with a complaint visit (Complaint Control # 29-AS-20241206113504). The purpose of the visit is to issue a citation for deficiencies observed during the initial complaint investigation. During the visit on 12/09/2024 between 10:30AM – 11:20AM, LPA reviewed four (4) resident files and observed Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) with a dementia diagnosis without a current physician’s report for 2024 (both dated 08/17/2022). Administrator Holly Gold stated that the residents are seen by hospice nurses and doctors and that the forms have been sent to the doctor to be filled out. However, Administrator was unable to provide physician’s reports for 2023. R1 and R2 also did not have current appraisals of needs and services with R1’s dated 03/19/2021 and R2’s dated 09/03/2021. Administrator stated that they have R1’s current appraisal and provided LPA with an unsigned copy dated on 03/21/2024. Administrator signed the copy today, 12/09/2024, with the date 03/21/2024, but resident or responsible party of resident remained unsigned at the time of the visit. Administrator stated that the appraisal has been reviewed with R1’s family. The following deficiency was observed (See LIC 809-D.) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Administrator was informed that failure to correct deficiency may result in civil penalties. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87705(c)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 23, 2024

87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (c) Licensees who accept...residents with dementia shall be...ensuring the following: (5) Each resident with dementia shall have an annual medical assessment...and a reappraisal done at least annually... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as R1 and R2 have dementia and did not have an annual medical assessment and reappraisal which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee and Administrator stated they will obtain current medical assessments and reappraisals for R1 and R2 and submit proof to CCL by 12/23/2024.

Nov 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Physical abuse by staff led resident sustaining a large bruise.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Barutyan arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct an initial complaint investigation for the allegation listed above at 10:08AM. LPA met with Administrator Holly Gold and Licensee Brandon Jakobovich. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA interviewed eight (8) staff, two (2) residents, conducted a health and safety check at 11:50AM, and reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documents. At approximately 12:05PM, LPA discussed allegations with Licensee and Administrator. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated It was alleged that physical abuse by staff led resident to sustain a large bruise. Interviews with Licensee, Administrator, Staff #1 (S1), and Staff #2 (S2) agreed that on 10/08/2024, Resident #1 (R1) asked S1 to leave their wheelchair by the bed before S1 left R1’s room, but S1 did not feel it would be safe since it would prompt R1 to attempt to transfer from the bed alone and risk a fall. R1 got agitated and swung the phone pull cord at S1, which then led to S1 grabbing R1’s hand to remove the pull cord. S2 stated they were nearby and heard R1 yelling “stop hitting me.” S2 stated they immediately went to R1’s room and observed R1 holding the pull cord and S1 trying to remove the pull cord before R1 could hurt S1. S2 stated that S1 was not hitting R1, but R1 claimed that S1 slapped their hand. S1 denied the claim and told S2 they were trying to remove the pull cord. S2 stated they told S1 to leave the wheelchair by R1’s bed and to leave the room so R1 could calm down. S2 stated they did not observe marks on R1 or S1 and that there have been no other incidents with R1. The complainant alleged that a large bruise was observed on R1’s right arm that was different colors, indicating the bruise could be older. The complainant stated that R1 has a condition which gives R1 an unsteady gait and has caused multiple falls, and that it is possible the bruise is from a previous fall. However, the complainant stated that R1 stated multiple times that facility staff hit R1. According to the complainant, R1 did not initially state that S1 hit R1 and R1 denies every hitting S1. LPA interviewed R1 who stated that they “feel safe” but there was an incident two weeks ago where staff “punched” R1. R1 stated they do not remember the staff member, what they look like, or what events led up to the incident. R1 was unable to provide additional details to LPA. R1 stated they were told that the staff member would be kept away from them. The complainant, S1, Licensee, Administrator, and S2 also confirmed that S1 will not tend to the resident and is covering a different section of the facility. The complainant, R1, Licensee, and Administrator, all confirmed that R1 stated they do not want S1 to lose their job. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C The Licensee conducted an investigation and had undetermined findings due to S1 and R1 having different accounts of the incident. Family of R1 stated they felt the incident was handled in a satisfactory way. Record review of R1’s medical records indicate that R1 is prescribed a daily 81 mg dose of Aspirin, a blood thinner medication that could cause easy bruising. A physician’s report dated 08/06/2024 and appraisals dated 08/08/2024 indicate that R1 has an abnormal gait, mild cognitive impairment, requires a walker and wheelchair, is able to self-transfer out of bed or chair, and is a high fall risk. Licensee and Administrator stated that although the physician’s report documents that R1 is able to self-transfer, that determination might not be accurate because the physician’s report was completed at a skilled nursing facility and not by R1’s primary care provider. S2 stated that S1 does not like to leave wheelchairs by residents’ beds so that residents are more inclined to call staff for transfer assistance rather than attempting to transfer alone. S2 stated that this has prevented many falls, but that they told S1 to leave the wheelchair by R1’s bed anyway due to R1’s request. Staff #3 (S3), Staff #4 (S4), and the Administrator confirmed that R1 had 1-2 falls when R1 first moved into the facility, but that there have not been falls within the last month. S3 stated that R1 is alert sometimes, but also has moments of forgetfulness where R1 cannot recall events, repeats phrases, and exhibits dementia symptoms. During staff interviews, S1, S2, and Staff #5 (S5) who showered R1 on 11/16/2024 and 11/13/2024, stated they did not observe any marks or bruises on R1. Licensee and Administrator stated they were not aware of any marks or bruising on R1. However, at 3:48PM, LPA observed a 2-inch purple bruise on R1’s upper right arm with larger yellow and green hues surrounding the purple mark. LPA asked R1 about the bruise, R1 initially stated they were punched by a staff member but then stated that they do not remember where the bruise came from. LPA reviewed a body check conducted by Guardian Angel Home Health on 10/22/2024, that documented that R1 did not have any bruising. Based on interviews, record review, and observation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred, therefore, the allegation “Physical abuse by staff led resident sustaining a large bruise” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No deficiencies issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241115145747
Nov 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Barutyan conducted a Case Management - Deficiencies visit in conjunction with a complaint visit (Complaint Control # 29-AS-20241115145747). The purpose of the visit is to issue a citation for a deficiency observed during the initial complaint investigation. During the visit on 11/18/2024, LPA observed Staff #1 (S1) without a criminal record exemption and Staff #2 (S2) without a criminal record clearance transfer. Licensee Brandon Jakobovich stated that S1 will submit a new livescan and obtain a criminal record exemption and that S2’s criminal record clearance will be transferred and associated to the facility. The following deficiency was observed (See LIC 809-D.) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Civil penalties were issued in the amount of $1000. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in additional civil penalties. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 19, 2024

87355Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as S1 did not have a criminal record exemption and S2 did not have a transfer of criminal record clearance which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2024

Plan of correction: The licensee stated that S1 will submit a new livescan by tomorrow and obtain a criminal record exemption and that S2 will be associated to the facility. Licensee will submit proof to CCL by 11/19/2024.

Oct 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Barutyan arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 9:25AM. Upon arrival, LPA met with Administrator Holly Gold and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 09:32AM, the LPA, along with the Administrator, toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: COMMON AREAS: The common areas include two (2) lounges, two (2) outdoor patios, dining room, activity room, beauty salon, and book nook. LPA observed required postings throughout the common area. Common areas were observed to be properly furnished with enough seating to accommodate residents and with appropriately screened fireplace. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. LPA tested auditory exit device at 09:51AM, exits were observed to have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. Fire extinguishers throughout the facility were fully charged and were last serviced 04/09/2024. Fire system devices are tested annually and were last tested 06/06/2024. BEDROOMS: LPA inspected eleven (11) randomly selected bedrooms between 09:42AM – 11AM. Resident bedrooms were properly furnished with a bed, night stand, chest of drawers, closet space, and sufficient lighting for each resident. Bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. At 09:42AM, LPA observed stained carpets in room 1. At 09:51AM, LPA observed food crumbs and stains on the carpet in room 38. At 10:52AM, LPA observed a hole about 4 inches in size on the lower portion of the bathroom door, a broken dresser with a loose drawer that poses a safety hazard if it were to fall, and stained carpets in room 44. Administrator immediately replaced the broken dresser and will schedule a carpet shampooing. Report Continued on LIC 809 BATHROOMS: Resident bathrooms are shared between rooms with door access from each. Some bedrooms have private bathrooms that are not shared. LPA observed bathrooms in each resident bedroom to be clean and properly supplied with functional grab bars and fixtures. LPA observed pull cords by the toilet. Hot water was measured in five (5) bathrooms and was between 106.1 – 117.4 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range. There are eight (8) shower rooms, however, four (4) are in use. Shower rooms were observed to be clean, sanitary, in operating condition with non-skid surfaces, and sufficiently stocked with linens and personal hygiene supplies. KITCHEN: At 10:21AM, LPA toured the kitchen. The kitchen is kept inaccessible to residents in care. Knives and sharps are kept inaccessible to residents in care. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. At 10:22AM, LPA observed a dented can of tomatoes, staff discarded can immediately, and observed enchilada sauce stored in an old cottage cheese container without dates or labels. Kitchen staff stated that the enchilada sauce was made one week ago. At 10:23AM, LPA observed two (2) containers of expired Lactaid Milk (expired 09/16/2024 and 09/29/2024). Staff immediately discarded expired items. At 10:28AM, LPA observed unlabeled and undated meats stored in the freezer that were gray in color and had freezer burn. Kitchen staff stated they will go through the freezer and remove all unlabeled and undated items. MEDICATION REVIEW: LPA began medication review at 10:29AM and reviewed medications for three (3) residents. Medications are centrally stored in the medication room by the business office. Medications are prepped up to 24 hours in advance in medication cups. All medications reviewed were stored and documented per regulation. RECORDS REVIEW: Beginning at 11:14AM, LPA reviewed five (5) personnel and five (5) residents files for documents including but not limited to: resident Admission Agreement, resident physician’s report, TB test, health screening, staff training and fingerprint clearance. All five (5) personnel and resident files reviewed were in compliance with regulation at the time of the visit. Report Continued on LIC 809 INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today's visit, LPA reviewed the facility's infection control policy as well as the emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster plan is updated annually as required. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly as is required, with the last drill conducted on 08/17/2024. INTERVIEWS: During today’s visit, LPA interviewed three (3) residents and three (3) staff. During today’s visit, LPA obtained a copy of the facility’s liability insurance. Pursuant to Title 22, CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Administrator was informed that failure to correct deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, report issued, and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2024
May 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not assist resident with self administered medications as prescribed Facility staff did not accurately document resident's medication administration

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted a subsequent complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPA arrived at the facility at 01:58PM and met with Administrator Brandon Jakobovich. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA interviewed Administrator, conducted staff interviews 02:24PM and 02:33PM, and LPA reviewed medications for 3 (three) residents. During the initial complaint visit conducted on 04/23/2024, LPA interviewed Administrator at 01:40PM, toured the facility at 02:18PM, LPA observed Resident #1 (R1), reviewed R1's file and obtained copies of pertinent documents, and at 02:48PM, LPA reviewed medications for 3 (three) residents, including R1. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated The complaint alleges that medications for Resident #1 (R1), who has a diagnosis of dementia, are not being administered as prescribed and not documented accurately on their medication list, as reflected by inaccurate expiration dates listed on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Interview with both Administrators indicates that R1 has resided at the facility since 2022, previously with their spouse. After their spouse passed away, R1's son became their responsible party. R1's son then did not pay the facility fees and was non-responsive to management's attempts at correspondence. Facility staff indicated they faxed requests to R1's physician for medication refills, however received response faxes indicating R1 was no longer their patient. Administrator contacted the facility's pharmacy provider for R1's medications and Administrator paid the balance on R1's account so that R1's medications would be refilled. In October 2023, Administrators contacted Adult Protective Services (APS) to file a report on R1's son, as the facility was still unable to reach him and R1 continued to accrue a balance at the facility and pharmacy. The facility contracted pharmacy continued to provide medications for R1 through the end of December 2023, after APS had assisted R1 in obtaining medical insurance through a new provider and had brought R1's medications to the facility. Interview revealed that the facility's pharmacy provides the MAR records for the residents at the facility, based on their most recent medication list provided to them. As R1 did not have a physician for some time, and even when R1 got new medical insurance and APS took R1 to the doctor, no new medication list or prescription orders were provided to the facility or the pharmacy. Interview revealed that without getting new orders or a new medication list, the pharmacy will not remove any medications from the MAR, even at the facility's request. Facility staff interviewed indicated that at no time did R1 go without medications. Medications reviewed during both facility visits revealed that the medications were documented and administered as prescribed, on both the centrally stored medication record and the MAR. Based on interview and record review, although the allegations may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations, therefore, the allegations that "Facility staff did not assist resident with self administered medications as prescribed" and "Facility staff did not accurately document resident's medication administration" are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240422132222
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Brian Balisi and Martha Arroyo arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 9:30am. Upon arrival LPAs met with Administrator Holly Gold and explained the reason for the visit. At approx. 10am LPAs toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Common Areas: LPAs inspected the common areas throughout the facility. The common areas include two (2) lounges, (2) outdoor patios, Dining room, activity room and book nook. There is a dedicated area for the posting of required documents directly by the Medication room. The common areas were observed to be properly furnished and relatively clean at the of the visit. LPA observed appropriate signage regarding infection control posted throughout the facility. At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. Smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detectors were operational at the time of the visit. Fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility, fully charged and were last serviced May 18, 2023. All exits were observed to have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. The LPAs observed required postings throughout the common spaces. Bedrooms: At approximately 10:10am, LPAs inspected (6) randomly selected bedrooms. The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with a bed, night stand, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. LPA observed all bathrooms in each resident bedroom were clean, properly supplied and had functional fixtures. The hot water was measured in each bathroom within 105 - 120 degrees Fahrenheit. At 10:20am LPAs observed multiple personal hygiene items in Room 16 , easily accessible to residents in care. At 10:32am LPAs observed hand lotion in Room 49., easily accessible to residents in care. Continued from 809 There are 5 shower rooms . LPAs observed shower rooms were clean, sanitary and in operating condition with non-skid surfaces. The shower rooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies of linen and personal hygiene supplies. LPAs observed kitchen was inaccessible to residents in care. Knives are kept inaccessible to residents in care. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. At approximately 10:17am the LPAs observed non-perishable items in poor condition – Mint Jelly (expired 08/27/2023). LPAs observed staff immediately discard expired items. Dining room furniture were observed to be in good condition and appeared to be relatively clean. LPAs observed staff cleaning the dining room. At approximately 11:45am, LPAs observed residents having lunch in dining room. Records review began at 10:55 am, six (6) resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to: appraisals, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. Six (6) Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. Last emergency disaster drill was conducted - 8/23/2023 Evacuation Drill Medications review began at approximately 1:30pm The medications are centrally stored in a med room on the first floor. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. Upon entry, the facility has a central entry point for symptom screening, temperature checks, and sanitation station. At this time, the staff will continue to keep up signs that promotes good hand hygiene and symptoms of Communicable disease. The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of a communicable disease. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Continued from 809-C Between 12pm - 1pm the LPAs interviewed six (6) staff and four (4) residents. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 809-D.) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Ventura County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Ventura County