Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

River Bluffs Memory Care Community

Mid-size home·Licensed for 36·Fresno, California

Licensed since 2020Licence #107209048Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Typical starting rate$4,500 a monthTypical in Fresno County · likely $3,500–$5,500
  • Home sizeLicensed for 36Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit33 of 36 beds occupiedAugust 4, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitAugust 4, 2026CDSS inspection record

River Bluffs Memory Care Community is a mid-size care home in Fresno — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 36 residents since 2020. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about River Bluffs Memory Care Community

Is River Bluffs Memory Care Community licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is River Bluffs Memory Care Community licensed for?

36 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has River Bluffs Memory Care Community been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 26 state visits over the same years.

Is River Bluffs Memory Care Community still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does River Bluffs Memory Care Community cost?

$4,500 a month to start is typical in Fresno County, likely $3,500–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Fresno County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Fresno that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,450 to $5,175 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does River Bluffs Memory Care Community take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Sierra Meadows Senior Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Can River Bluffs Memory Care Community keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

River Bluffs Memory Care Community license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “RIVER BLUFFS MEMORY CARE COMMUNITY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #107209048. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 36 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Sierra Meadows Senior Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 26 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 26 state visits in that period.
  • 10 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 4, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 36 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 10 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. THIRTY-SIX (36) NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TEN (10).

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Typical starting rate

$4,500a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,500

Covelight’s researched range for Fresno County · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,500a month

Likely $3,500–$5,700

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,500–$5,500

    Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Fresno County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,700
$4,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$8,850
$6,500
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure

Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Fresno County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 7 nearby homes that publish a rate

Where it is

  • 5425 W. Spruce Ave., Fresno, CA 93722Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 19 documents for this home, and its records count 26 visits since 2020. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 4, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
26
Most recent visit
August 4, 2026
Occupied at that visit
33 of 36 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 10 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated November 2, 2021 to August 4, 2026. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (8). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 10 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 2
  • Total complaints10typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2020.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020253612024230202322020222402021220

The last 36 months — 12 of 19 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide a refund upon resident’s death

On 8/04/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA arrived, stated purpose of visit, and allowed entrance to facility, Administrator, Donna Hurley was not available to meet with LPA during today's visit, LPA met with Health Services Director, Alexis Martin During the subsequent visit, LPA conducted additional interviews and received additional documentation. Based on LPA review of documentation and interviews conducted, family for Resident 1 (R1) did receive a refund but payment was rendered on 7/15/2026. This date of payment was approximately six (6) months after R1 passed away and their personal belongings were packed by facility. Interviews indicated that payment was rendered by facility two times but was sent to incorrect addresses on file and the third time a check was mailed never cashed. Based on information gathered, interviews and record review the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260709110654
May 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced visit today for the facility’s annual inspection. LPA met with, Licensee, Donna Hurley, Continual Administrator's Certification expires 02/19/2027. There are currently 34 residents who reside at this home and there is 7 residents on hospice at this time. LPA inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including the common living spaces, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, activity rooms, medication storage, kitchen, and outdoor areas. Bedrooms were clean and in good repair. There is a locked storage for medications. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. Fire extinguisher is within the safety regulation period. Smoke alarms were tested and are operational. The home has a carbon monoxide detector and performs disaster drills as required. Water temperature was tested in multiple rooms between 113 degrees and 116 degrees. First Aid kit is on site and complete. Toxins and cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible. LPA observed medication for Resident 1 documented on Centrally Stored Medication record with start date of 05/20/2026 despite resident being hospitalized and not administered any medication. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's inspection per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA requested the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 610-E the Emergency Disaster Plan and copy of current Administrator’s Certificate to update the facility file. Listed documents shall be sent to Licensing. Exit interview conducted with, Licensee, Donna Hurley and copy of report left at facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2026

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20253 state visits · 6 documents
Aug 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide clean clothing to resident in care in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint investigation. LPA met with and discussed the allegation with Administrator (AD) Donna Hurley. Investigation findings were delivered during this visit. This Department investigated the allegation above. Multiple staff were interviewed with consistent reporting of Resident (R1's) preferences, behavioral expressions, and ADL needs. Additionally, If R1 was in a Case Management/therapy visit, staff would be reluctant to interrupt. File review was conducted, Service Plan 10/25/25 notes R1 requires assist required for dressing from staff. Based on interview and record review the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. There were no citations issued. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250725101336
Aug 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility does not ensure resident is free from physical abuse

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct the initial complaint investigation. LPA met with and discussed the allegation with Administrator (AD) Donna Hurley. Investigation findings were delivered during this visit. Interviews were conducted of facility staff which included Caregivers, Med Tech, Activity Director and Administrator. Interview statements were consistent, R1 has not reported abuse and there have been no reports or observations of skin markings or bruising. R1's Hospice Case Manager visits regularly and stated there have been no changes or irregularities in R1’s skin condition. When asked, R1 denied experiencing any kind of physical abuse and praised the staff. This Agency has investigated the allegation listed above. We have found that the allegation is UNFOUNDED, therefore we have dismissed the allegation. There were no citations issued. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report was provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250822151010
Aug 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown conducted a Case Management in conjunction with a complaint visit (Control Number 24-AS-20250822151010). LPA met with and discussed the reason for this Case Management with Administrator (AD) Donna Hurley. During this visit, LPA toured the facility, selecting resident rooms to enter. Upon entering the room of R1 and R2, LPA observed a hospital bed with 2 - 1/2 side rails attached to one side of the bed. During this visit, a Physician's Order was obtained, and the rails were placed properly on the hospital bed. A deficiency is being cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations on the attached LIC 9099-D. An exit interview was conducted, and Plan of Correction was developed. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were provided to AD.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87608(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 29, 2025

87608 Postural Supports (a) Based on… Postural supports may be used under the following conditions.(3) A written order from a physician indicating the need for the postural support shall be maintained... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure there was a written physician's order indicating the resident's need for a postural support (1/2 side rails) for R1's hospital bed. There were 3 1/2 side rails attached to the bed, there should only be 1 per side This poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025

Plan of correction: AD obtained a complete written physician's order for R1's 1/2 siderails during the visit. The extra (3rd) side rail was removed to ensure the postural support was used safely and properly. DEFICIENCY CLEARED DURING VISIT

Jun 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct the Annual Inspection. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Administrator (AD) Donna Hurley and Alexis Martin. During this visit, LPA toured the facility inside & out. Resident rooms and common areas were clean, in good repair and contained required equipment, furnishings and lighting. LPA observed required items in bathrooms which were clean with faucets delivering hot water as required. LPA observed hygiene items, paper products, towels, extra bedding, and linens which were stored and available for use. The kitchen was found to be clean, with necessary items and appliances. LPA observed required food supply, emergency food, water, and paper products. Medications are centrally stored. Cleaning/disinfecting supplies and chemicals are locked and stored separate from food. Doors and passageways are unobstructed throughout the facility including outdoors. First aid kits contained required items. LPA walked the outdoors to find the grounds well-kept with clear walkways with sitting areas. Fire extinguishers were found to be charged and serviced 6/2/25. LPA conducted resident and staff file reviews. Emergency Disaster and Infection Control procedures and plans were reviewed during the inspection. Deficiencies are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations on the attached LIC 809-D. A Repeat Violation Civil Penalty is being assessed on the attached LIC421M. An exit interview was conducted and Plan of Correction (POC) developed. A signed copy of this report and Appeal Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2025
Mar 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to maintain bathroom cleanliness

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA explained the reason for the visit and the elements of the allegations with Wellness Director Alexis Martin (LVN) as Administrator (AD) Donna Hurley was unavailable at the time of visit. During this visit, LPA toured the facility with LVN. LPA was provided a resident roster and randomly selected rooms to observe. LPA observed the bathrooms of 12 currently occupied resident rooms and bathrooms. LPA observed multiple restrooms found to be unsanitary as evidenced by unclean toilets, toilet seats needing repair and briefs not being disposed of properly. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A deficiency is being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations on the attached LIC 9099-D. An exit interview was conducted and Plan of Correction was developed. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were discussed and left with Alexis Martin. Substantiated Continued from LIC9099 - Unsubstantiated report. The invoice was provided and notes that "General Monthly Service" was provided on this date. The invoice does not note service specific to roaches in resident rooms. Based on LPA observation, interview and record review the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur. There were no citations issued. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left with Alexis Martin.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250226141132

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 19, 2025

87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times..... (1) Floor surfaces in bath, laundry and kitchen areas shall be maintained in a clean, sanitary, and odorless condition. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that resident bathrooms are clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair. LPA observed multiple resident toilets that were unsanitary and unclean. 2 toilet seats are broken requiring replacement and a soiled resident brief was found on the floor in a resident bathroom.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator has agreed to provide inservice to all staff on the maintenance of resident bathroom requirements. A sign in sheet will be provided containing the name and signature of all appropriate staff attending the inservice. LVN ordered new toilet seats during the visit. A receipt and written statement that the repairs have been made as well as a receipt copy will be provided. The poc will be submitted to CCL via email by poc date.

Mar 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown is at the facility to conduct a Case Management visit in conjunction with a complaint investigation. LPA met with Wellness Director Alexis Martin (LVN) as Administrator (AD) Donna Hurley was unavailable at the time of visit. During this visit, LPA observed the following: 1. A sharp cooking knife was left in a drying rack in the facility kitchen. The knife was not secured or locked. 2. A bottle of bleach was left out on the counter of a laundry room counter. The room was unlocked and the door found ajar. 3. A housekeeping cart was left unattended in the hallway leaving cleaning and disinfecting supplies accessible. The items listed above were immediately removed and locked as required. A deficiency is being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations on the attached LIC 809-D, Section Storage Space and Access. The deficiency was cleared during this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a signed copy of this report and Appeal Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 6, 2025

87309 Storage Space and Access (a) Except as specified in subsection (b), the licensee shall ensure that disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisonous substances, knives..., are in locked storage and are not left unattended if outside the locked storage.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure a sharp cooking knife in the kitchen, bottle of bleach in a laundry room and an open housekeeping cart were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2025

Plan of correction: During the visit, the knife was removed and locked, bleach and housekeeping cart containing cleaning supplies were locked and secused. DEFICIENCY CLEARED DURING VISIT

20242 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident who ingested incorrect medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint visit and deliver investigation Findings. LPA met with Welness Director, Alexis Martin. This Department investigated the allegation: Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident who ingested incorrect medication. Interviews reveal that the staff are not aware of a medication error or emergency where a resident needed medical attention. The facility did not submit a Special Incident Report to CCL reporting an incident. The Reporting Party did not identify the resident who ingested the wrong medication, therefore a medication audit and file review could not be conducted. Based on interview and record review the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur. There were no citations issued. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was signed and left with Alexis Martin. Unsubstantiated This Department investigated the allegation: Licensee does not ensure facility is adequately staffed to meet resident's toileting needs. The facility was toured 7/25/24 and 9/24/24. Residents were observed throughout the common areas and in rooms dressed, appearing clean with no odors. Staff interviews did not reveal concern about staff meeting resident needs. Resident care plans note each residents assistance level for toileting and other ADLs. The staffing schedule was reviewed for July 2024. We have found that the allegations are UNFOUNDED, therefore we have dismissed the allegations. There were no citations issued. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was signed and left with Alexis Martin.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240717095726
Sep 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff yells at residents in care Staff is racist towards a resident in care Staff did not ensure residents clothing was changed Staff changed a resident in an aggressive manner Staff are not meeting the needs of a resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct the initial complaint investigation. LPA also delivered investigation findings during the visit. This Department investigated the allegations listed above. LPA toured the facility and found residents dressed in clean clothes with no odors noticed. Bedding was found to be clean as well. Multiple Care Providers (CPs) and Med Techs (MTs) from both AM and PM shifts were interviewed. All staff members interviewed denied seeing or knowing about any of the allegations listed above occurring at the facility. Multiple resident interviews were attempted. The residents were unable to answer or participate in conversation due to Dementia. Record reviews were conducted and revealed that R1's ostomy and catheter bags are changed or drained daily and as needed by trained staff. Based on interview and record review the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur. There were no citations issued. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left with Alexis Martin, whose signature confirms receipt of these documents. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240916165135
May 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct the Annual Inspection. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Administrator (AD) Donna Hurley and Wellness Director (WD) Alexis Martin. AD re-certification was confirmed to be in process during the visit. During this visit, LPA toured the facility inside & out Resident rooms are found to be in good repair and contained required furnishings and lighting. The resident bathrooms was clean and in good repair with faucets delivering hot water within required limits, grab bars and non-skid shower floors observed. LPA observed required hygiene items, towels, extra bedding, and linens were stored and available for use. The kitchen was clean, with necessary items and appliances. LPA observed required food supply and paper product storage. Cleaning/disinfecting supplies, knives and sharps are locked and stored separate from food. Medications are locked and centrally stored in a medication cart. The First aid kit contained required items. There are visitation areas available inside and out. Doors and passageways are unobstructed throughout the facility. The Fire extinguishers were serviced by Valley Fire Co. on 4/5/2024. LPA conducted resident and staff file reviews. A medication audit was also conducted Emergency Disaster Plan and Infection Control Plans were reviewed during this visit and found to be updated. A deficiency is being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations on the attached LIC 809-D in the area of: Hospice Care Waiver and Incidental Medical and Dental Care. An exit interview was conducted and Plan of Correction (POC) developed. A copy of this report was signed by AD and Appeal Rights were provided. LPA requested the following updated forms faxed to CCLD by 5/22/2024: Designation of Facility Responsibility (Lic308), Administrative Organization (Lic309), Surety Bond (Lic402), Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610E), Client Roster (LIC 9020), Proof of current Liability Coverage.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are blocking the facility's exits Staff spoke inappropriately towards a resident while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the initial 10 - day complaint inspection. LPA met with and explained the elements of the allegations with Administrator (AD) Donna Hurley. Immediately upon arrivial to the facility, AD and LPA toured the facility. LPA observed that passageways and emergency exits were free of obstruction. Based on observation and staff interviews, the exits were not blocked during this visit. Interviews were conducted with 3 Care Providers who worked the day RP identified overhearing a staff member speak inappropriately to Resident (R1). The CPs interviewed deny being aware of or hearing the inappropriate conduct. See LIC 9099-C for continuation of this report Unsubstantiated Based on observation, interview and record review of R1's file, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. There were no citations issued An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left with AD, whose signature confirms receipt of these documents. R1 ambulates independently with a walker. Record review and interview state that R1 can walk through the facility independently including in and out of the room by self. This Agency has investigated the allegations listed above. We have found that the allegations are UNFOUNDED, therefore we have dismissed the allegations. There were no citations issued An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left with AD, whose signature confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231024092235
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a petReported no

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Fresno County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Fresno County