Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,650 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,750
- Home sizeLicensed for 4Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit4 of 4 beds occupiedMarch 4, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitAugust 17, 2026CDSS inspection record
Peppermint Ridge is a small care home in Corona — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 4 residents since 2024. Bedridden care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Peppermint Ridge
Is Peppermint Ridge licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Peppermint Ridge licensed for?
4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Peppermint Ridge been cited?
0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.
Is Peppermint Ridge still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Peppermint Ridge cost?
$4,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,800–$5,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 11 other homes of a similar licensed size in Corona that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,125 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,500 (n = 11 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Peppermint Ridge take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Peppermint Ridge, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Corona Regional Medical Center is 0.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Peppermint Ridge keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Peppermint Ridge license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “PEPPERMINT RIDGE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #335530186. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Peppermint Ridge, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 9 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 4 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR TWO (2). APPROVED FOR FOUR (4) NON-AMBULATORY/BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. DELAYED EGRESS IS NOT PERMITTED.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,650a month to start
Likely $3,800–$5,750
From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,650a month
Likely $3,800–$5,950
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$4,650likely $3,800–$5,750
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,800–$5,950
- $4,650
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,450–$9,050
- $6,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,800–$6,000.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Twin Hearts Senior Care IICorona · 0.4 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Clarissa's Home CareCorona · 0.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Amistad Assisted Living and Memory Care HomeCorona · 1.1 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Senior Oasis 2Corona · 3.0 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Apple Senior Care of CoronaCorona · 3.1 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Victoria Ann Elderly CareRiverside · 3.3 mi · Small home$3,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Gabriela Care HomeCorona · 3.4 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Cura AmoreCorona · 3.4 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Heart of Joy Home CareCorona · 3.5 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Cathy's Cottage - Assisted Living and Memory CareCorona · 3.6 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Cathy's Cottage PalmsCorona · 3.6 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- A Dressage Home CareRiverside · 4.4 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 648 Locust St, Corona, CA 92879Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2024, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2024. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 17, 2026.
- On file since
- 2024
- State visits
- 9
- Most recent visit
- August 17, 2026
- Occupied · March 4, 2026 visit
- 4 of 4 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 22, 2025 to March 4, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations2typical 0
- Substantiated allegations2typical 0
- Total complaints3typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 8 of 8 documents
Aug 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrew Martinez made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting the required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Facility Manager Claudia Cortes and was granted entry to the facility. At time of the visit there were (2) staff and (4) residents present. Facility Administrator Stephanie Barron was contacted and informed of the LPA's arrival and administrator arrived shortly after. LPA Martinez explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Stephanie Barron. The facility is a (4) bedroom, (2.5) bathroom home with a (2) car attached garage. There is a kitchen, dining/ family area, living room, and staff study. The facility is the Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of (4) non-ambulatory/bedridden residents with delayed egress not permitted. The facility has a hospice waiver for (2) residents, and the current census is (4) residents. LPA was accompanied by a to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). LPA observed no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 73 degrees Fahrenheit (F). LPA inspected resident bedrooms; all equipped with the necessary furniture (e.g., mattresses, lamps, chairs, storage space) and sufficient lightning per regulation. LPA observed that bathrooms were clean, and all bathroom fixtures and equipment were operating appropriately. LPA observed grab bars and non-skid mat in the resident bathrooms. LPA observed sufficient furniture/seating to accommodate indoor and outdoor activities for residents in care and guests. LPA measured taps delivering hot water in the bathroom and kitchen to be at 107 degrees F. The facility is equipped with operating combination smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors. *** Continuation in LIC 809-C *** Physical Plant continued: Postings such as personal rights, the CCLD complaint poster, Ombudsman Poster, Labor Laws, facility license, administrator's certificate, and the Emergency Disaster plan were posted in a common area. Sharps were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. There is designated storage spaces for residents and staff files, and locked cabinets in the staff study storing residents’ medications. Food Service: Seven (7) days non-perishable and three (3) days perishable food supply observed at the facility. Food preparation surfaces are kept clean and there is a sufficient amount of tableware (e.g. plates, cups, utensils, etc.) to accommodate residents in care. Care & Supervision: LPA observed the facility's current Personnel Report LIC 500 and staff schedule shows a sufficient number of staff scheduled to provide twenty-four hour supervision to the residents in care. Record Review: LPA reviewed (3) completed resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and pre-placement appraisals, as well as their Medications Administration Record (MAR) showing no errors/issues. LPA reviewed three (3) completed staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training, and health screenings with tuberculosis (TB) test results. Disaster/earthquake/fire drills were observed to be conducted quarterly on a shift-rotational basis. Based on today's observations (1) Technical Violation is being cited based on Title 22 California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this Facility Evaluation Report (LIC 809, LIC 809-C) and Appeal Rights were discussed and copies were provided to Administrator Stephanie Barron.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 17, 2026
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Mar 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate food service
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Stephanie Barron. On February 24, 2026, it was alleged that staff did not provide adequate food service. According to the allegation received, the food that was bought for the facility was food that residents do not eat or cannot eat. It was alleged that staff are only providing residents with food that staff enjoy and residents do not. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff and resident interviews. [CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C] Unsubstantiated Interviews with staff and residents did not reveal concern with the meals and snacks provided for residents. During LPA’s visit on March 4, 2026, LPA observed at least 2-days perishable food and at least 7-days non-perishable food all safely stored. Review of the facility food menu did not reveal inadequate meals were provided. Based on LPA observations, interviews, and record review, the investigation did not yield a preponderance of evidence to conclude staff did not provide adequate food service. Based on the foregoing, the allegation is unsubstantiated. This finding means that although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Operations Manager Jessica Paz, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260224094307
Mar 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced case management visit to. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Administrator Stephanie Barron & Operations Manager Jessica Paz. On November 20, 2025, the facility self-reported an incident that occurred on November 19, 2026, involving Staff #1 (S1) using the facility debit card to make personal charges. The charges made by S1 would have come from Resident #1 (R1)’s P&I balance [See LIC811 Confidential Name List for identification of select person identifiers used in this report]. During today’s visit, LPA observed residents in care, reviewed facility records, and interviewed residents and staff. There were no deficiencies cited during today's visit and an exit interview was conducted with Operations Manager Jessica Paz, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided to.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2026
Oct 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure the facility had sufficient staffing. Licensee falsified records.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Operations Manager Jessica Paz. On October 6, 2025, it was alleged that licensee did not ensure the facility had sufficient staffing and licensee falsified records. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff and resident interviews. According to the allegations received, Resident #1 (R1) requires a Hoyer lift and two staff members to transfer them. However, the facility was understaffed and there have been incidents where there is only one staff member at the facility. Also, the staff were incorrectly filling out Medication Administration Records (MARs) and other pertinent documents at the facility. [Continued on LIC9099-C] Substantiated Review of R1’s medical assessment date May 22, 2025, revealed that R1 is non-ambulatory and can feed themself but required assistance with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Interviews revealed that R1 requires a Hoyer lift to be transferred to their wheelchair from their bed. Interviews also revealed that the Hoyer lift requires two (2) staff members, and there have been instances where there is only one (1) staff member on-site at the facility. Due to only one (1) staff member being present at the facility, R1 could not be transferred until another staff member had to be called to come to the facility and assist with the transfer. During LPA’s initial visit on October 14, 2025, from 9:20AM-11:15AM, LPA reviewed facility records. Review of the residents’ MARs revealed that a staff member had initiated an administration at 12:00PM prior to it being 12:00PM. Review of R1’s repositioning checklist also revealed that a staff member had initialed the repositioning of R1 at 12:00PM and at 2:00PM prior to those times. The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegations and based on interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence exists to support the allegations. Two deficiencies are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D). An exit interview was conducted with Operations Manager Jessica Paz, to whom a copy of this report, LIC 9099-C, LIC 9099-D, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to. Review of R1’s medical assessment date May 22, 2025, revealed that R1 is non-ambulatory and can feed themself but required assistance with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Interviews revealed that R1 requires a Hoyer lift to be transferred to their wheelchair from their bed and the Hoyer lift requires two (2) staff members to operate it. Interviews did not reveal that staff have transferred R1 with only one (1) staff member nor have staff operated the Hoyer lift if they are the only staff on site at the facility. Review of staff training records did not reveal that staff are untrained in medications. Records reviewed revealed that current medication trainings were maintained on file for staff members. Based on interviews and records review, the investigation did not yield a preponderance of evidence to conclude that staff did not meet resident’s transfer needs and staff did not have medication training. Based on the foregoing, the allegations are unsubstantiated. This finding means that although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Operations Manager Jessica Paz, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251006094602
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 21, 2025
87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that there was not sufficient number of staff to transfer Resident #1 (R1) which posed a potentional health, safety, or personal rights risk to one (1) out of four (4) persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to conduct an in-house training on staffing requirements and submit training agenda and sign-in sheet to the Department by POC date of 11/21/2025.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87207 · Plan of correction due date: Nov 21, 2025
87207 False Claims No licensee... or employee of a licensee shall make or disseminate any false or misleading statement regarding ... any of the services provided by the facility. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that resident records were falsely filled out in advance for Resident #1 (R1) which posed a potential health and safety risk to one (1) out of four (4) persons in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to conduct an in-house training on medication administration and submit training agenda and sign-in sheet to the Department by POC date of 11/21/2025.
Sep 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is verbally abusing residents. Staff are mismanaging resident's medications. Staff are not meeting resident's medical needs. Staff are not providing adequate supervision.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Jessica Paz and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of resident and staff interviews and record review. For the allegation, staff is verbally abusing residents. LPA conducted (2) resident interviews. 2 out of the 2 residents stated facility staff do not verbally abuse them. LPA conducted (2) staff interviews. 2 out of the 2 facility staff stated they have not verbally abused any of the clients in care and have not witnessed other facility staff do so. Unsubstantiated For the allegation, Staff are mismanaging resident's medications. LPA conducted (2) resident interviews. 2 out of the 2 residents stated facility staff do not mismanage residents medications. LPA conducted (2) staff interviews. 2 out of the 2 facility staff stated they do not mismanage residents medications and all medications are administered as prescribed. LPA observed all (4) residents medications. No issues were observed. For the allegation, Staff are not meeting residents medical needs. LPA conducted (2) resident interviews. 2 out of the 2 residents stated facility staff meet their medical needs. LPA conducted (2) staff interviews. 2 out of the 2 facility staff stated all residents medical needs are being met. Staff #2 (S2) reported residents are taken as needed to doctor appointments or hospital visits. For the allegation, Staff are not providing adequate supervision. LPA conducted (2) resident interviews. 2 out of the 2 residents stated facility staff are providing adequate supervision. LPA conducted (2) staff interviews. 2 out of the 2 facility staff stated they are providing adequate supervision. Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. During today’s visit pertaining to the allegations listed, no deficiency were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Administrator Jessica Paz.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250916084407
Aug 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 08/21/2025, at 09:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Singh met with a staff and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there were two (2) staff present, and five (5) residents present. Facility Administrator Stephanie Barron was contacted and informed of the visit, administrator Stephanie Barron arrived during the visit. LPA Singh explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Stephanie Barron. The facility is a four (4) bedroom, two and a half (2 1/2) bathroom home with a attached garage. There is a kitchen/dining area, living room, activity room and laundry area. The facility is the Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of four (4) residents of which three (3) can be non-ambulatory and one (1) bedridden. The current census is two (2) residents. LPA was accompanied by administrator Stephanie Barron to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). LPA observed no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 74 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, lamps and storage space. LPA observed sufficient lightning. Moreover, LPA observed that bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed grab bars and non-skid mat in the resident bathrooms. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 106 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. ***Continuation in LIC809C *** Posters such as personal rights, the CCLD complaint poster, Ombudsman Poster, Labor Laws and the Emergency Disaster plan were posted in a common area. LPA observed the knives locked and inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. There is a cabinet in the staff office with the residents’ medications locked in the medication cabinet. Food Service: Seven (7) days non-perishable and three (3) days perishable food supply observed at the facility. Care & Supervision: The facility has certified administrators. LPA Singh observe sufficient number of staff to provide care and supervision to the residents in care. Record Review: LPA reviewed three (3) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and pre-placement appraisals. The files reviewed were complete. LPA reviewed three (3) personnel files- one(1) administrator and two(2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training, and health screenings with tuberculosis (TB) test results. Fire drill conducted on 05/28/2025 and earthquake drill was conducted on 06/20/2025 at the facility. LPA Singh also reviewed medications administration record (MAR), was complete, no issues. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC809, LIC809C were discussed and provided to Facility Administrator Stephanie Barron and operations manager-Jessica Paz.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025
Jul 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an announced Pre licensing visit 07/08/2024 at 09:08 AM. This is an announced Pre-Licensing visit conducted with Administrator Jessica Paz who assisted in the tour of inside and outside of facility and the evaluation. The follow up visit was made and observed the following. The facility is a four (4) bedroom and two and a half (2 1/2) bathroom home with an attached garage. Facility tour reveals the physical plan meeting regulations. Water temperature 113.5 degrees. Facility has appropriate furnishings to meet the needs of the resident. Outdoor tour has shaded areas and free from obstructions. The facility has locked cabinets where medication, disinfectants, and other items that are to be inaccessible to clients are needed. The facility carbon monoxide and smoke detectors were tested and found to be in working order. On this date, a COMP III orientation was conducted. The facility was evaluated in accordance with the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, CCR. Based on the observations and evaluation of the facility this date, the facility’s ready for licensure. Administrator will be notified once facility is licensed. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided with Administrator Jessica Paz.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2024
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Apr 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Office
Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: Initial Capacity: 4 Census (if any clients in care): 0 COMP II Participants: MCCARNS, DANEETE - APPLICANT & BARRON, STEPHANIE - ADMINISTRATOR Interview Method: Virtual interview (Skype, Go To Meeting, etc) On 04/11/2024, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Barrett Villa
Corona · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$5,300 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Brookdale Corona
Corona · Large community · 0.4 mi away
$5,180 a month to start · Listed by the home
Twin Hearts Senior Care II
Corona · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$3,800 a month to start · Listed by the home
Zion Senior Living
Corona · Small home · 0.7 mi away
$5,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Valencia Terrace
Corona · Large community · 0.7 mi away
$4,270 a month to start · Listed by the home
Clarissa's Home Care
Corona · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Listed by the home