Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Paradise Seniors Living Valley

Small home·Licensed for 4·Lemon Grove, California

Licensed since 2024Licence #374604829
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400
  • Home sizeLicensed for 4Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit3 of 4 beds occupiedAugust 13, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 13, 2026CDSS inspection record

Paradise Seniors Living Valley is a small care home in Lemon Grove — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 4 residents since 2024. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Paradise Seniors Living Valley

Is Paradise Seniors Living Valley licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Paradise Seniors Living Valley licensed for?

4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Paradise Seniors Living Valley been cited?

3 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is Paradise Seniors Living Valley still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Paradise Seniors Living Valley cost?

$5,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,250–$6,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 195 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Diego County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 195 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Paradise Seniors Living Valley take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Brenda Cardona, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Grossmont Hospital is 3.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Paradise Seniors Living Valley keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Paradise Seniors Living Valley license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “PARADISE SENIORS LIVING VALLEY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374604829. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Brenda Cardona, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 5 substantiated allegations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
APPROVED FOR: AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FOUR (4) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,200a month to start

Likely $4,250–$6,400

From 19 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,200a month

Likely $4,250–$6,550

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,200likely $4,250–$6,400

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,250–$6,550
$5,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,950–$9,650
$7,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

19 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$5,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 19 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 8117 Jefferson St, Lemon Grove, CA 91945Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2024, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2024. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 13, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

On file since
2024
State visits
6
Most recent visit
August 13, 2026
Occupied at that visit
3 of 4 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 12, 2026 to August 13, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations3typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations5typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622220251102024330

The last 36 months — 6 of 6 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide a full refund

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Boyles conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver investigative findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself, explained the purpose of the visit and nature of the complaint to Licensee Brenda Cardona. On June 22, 2026 the Department received this complaint which alleged facility staff did not provide a full refund. The Department’s investigation included record reviews, as well as interviews with staff and outside sources. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Substantiated (Continued from LIC9099) Based upon records and interviews, the following timeline was revealed: Resident #1 (R1) passed away at the facility on 10/11/25. [See LIC811 Confidential Name List for a description of select person identifiers used in this report.] R1’s responsible party removed R1’s personal belongings on 10/12/25. On 10/17/25 a medical supply company removed an electrical hospital bed that was used by R1. The facility issued a check of $4,290.00 on 11/21/25. This amount is reflective of the amount from date 10/17/25, however, the hospital bed is not a personal belonging of R1’s and belongs to the medical supply company. R1’s personal belongings were removed on 10/12/25. Therefore, the difference of $1,532.55 is owed to R1’s responsible party. Additionally, the facility did not issue the refund within 15 days, as required. The Department has investigated the allegation that facility staff did not provide a full refund. Based upon the information obtained during this investigation, it is determined that the preponderance of evidence was met to support or corroborate this allegation and therefore deemed substantiated. One deficiency is being cited (see attached LIC9099-D) and a plan of correction was jointly developed with the Licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Brenda Cardona, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee’s Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260622160555

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.652(c) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2026

1569.652 Termination of admission agreement upon death of resident; removal of resident's property; refund of fees paid... (c) A refund of any fees paid in advance covering the time after the resident's personal property has been removed from the facility shall be issued...within 15 days This requierment was not met as evidenced by: Based on records reveiwed and LPA interviews, Licensee did not issue a full refund within 15 days of R1's personal belongings being removed. This poses a personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to pay R1's responsible party the remaining amount owed of $1,532.55 and submit proof to LPA by POC due date.

Feb 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide resident medications as prescribed. Staff did not seek medical attention to resident. Staff wrongfully evicted resident. Staff did not provide resident's responsible party an itemized list.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to investigate the above-mentioned complaint allegations. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Ms. Cardona. On July 10, 2025, the Department received a complaint alleging that facility staff failed to administer medications to Resident 1 (R1) as prescribed. Staff 1 (S1) reported that R1 was admitted on May 19, 2025, and exhibited confusion and resistance to care. S1 acknowledged that R1 did not receive all prescribed medications and that missed or refused doses were not documented. Additionally, no physician was contacted regarding the missed medications. Substantiated (Continued from LIC9099) R1’s physician confirmed that the lack of medication could have contributed to R1’s condition and documented this in the resident’s medical file. Records review revealed no documentation of medication refusals, no physician contact logs, and an incomplete Medication Administration Record (MAR). LPA observations confirmed that the facility did not maintain complete and accurate medication records. The complaint also alleged that staff did not seek medical attention for resident. Outside Source 1 (OS1) observed that R1 appeared physically weak, disoriented, and unable to walk. OS1 conducted a medication count and determined that prescribed medications had not been administered. Records review confirmed the absence of documentation indicating that medical attention was sought or that the physician was notified. LPA observations supported that the facility did not respond appropriately to R1’s condition. The Department also received a complaint alleging that R1 was wrongfully evicted from the facility. S1 stated that the decision to discharge R1 was based on her being “disruptive.” OS1 reported being contacted by S1 on May 22, 2025, and was instructed to immediately pick up R1 from the facility. Records review confirmed that no formal eviction notice was issued to the resident, the responsible party, or Community Care Licensing. LPA observations confirmed that the facility did not follow proper eviction procedures. The complaint further alleged that the responsible party did not receive an itemized list of R1’s belongings upon discharge.S1 confirmed that no personal property inventory or itemized list was created for R1. OS1 reported that, despite multiple written requests, no itemized list of belongings or charges was provided. Records review confirmed the absence of documentation related to R1’s personal property. A licensed facility requires licensees to maintain and provide an itemized list of personal property and financial transactions upon discharge. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, a preponderance of evidence supports the allegations. Therefore, the allegations are SUBSTANTIATED.Deficiencies are cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D). A plan of correction was developed in consultation with the Administrator. An exit interview was conducted with Brenda Cardona, Administrator. A copy of this report, along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058, 03/22), was provided. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026 · control 08-AS-20250710140105

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569,683 · Plan of correction due date: Feb 13, 2026

Requirement: Licensees must provide a written 30-day eviction notice with specific reasons and notify the Department. This requirement was not met as evidenced by; Based on interviews, and records reviewed: The licensee did not provide a written 3 day notice to one of four residents in care which posed an immediate Health and Safety risk to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to be retrained on Eviction notices. Inform LPA of training registration date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 13, 2026

The licensee shall ensure that medications are given according to the physician's instructions. This requirement was not met as evidenced by; The licensee shall ensure that medications were given according to the physician's instructions in one of four persons in care which posed an immediateHealth and Safety risk to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to conduct a medication training for all staff and administrator, Inform LPA of training registration date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(g) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 13, 2026

The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health including, but not limited to, an apparent life-threatening medical crisis This requirement was not met as evidenced by; Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed: The licensee shall seek medical attention for one of four residents in care, which posed a potential Health and Safety risk to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to conduct a medical emergency training for all staff and administrator, Inform LPA of training registration date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87218(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 27, 2026

Theft and Loss. The initial personal property inventory shall be completed by the licensee, and the resident, or the resident's representative. Based on interviews, and records reviewed: The licensee did not provide or complete a resident belongings list to one of four residents in care which posed a potential Health and Safety risk to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to conduct a new admission training for all staff and administrator, Inform LPA of training registration date.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Nov 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Domingo was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator, Brenda Cardona. According to the facility’s license, the facility's license shows a maximum capacity of 4 (four) and the facility is approved for four (4), age sixty (60) and over, non-ambulatory and a hospice waiver for two (2). LPA, accompanied by licensee’s staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was 68 F. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant: Kitchen sink was 102 F, Bathroom #1 sink was 106 F, and Bathroom #2 sink was 106 F. Refrigerator temperature was 31 F and freezer temperature was 0 F. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPAs interviewed multiple staff and clients. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. LPA observed that residents were being treated with dignity by staff, and there were sufficient staff on duty to meet resident’s needs. The reviewed files contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Licensee's staff also presented proof of current/active business liability insurance and surety bond. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Brenda Cardona, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh and Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced, Required Post Licensing Inspection. The facility file and personnel report was reviewed prior to the visit. LPAs were welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to Licensee Brenda Cardona. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of 4 and the facility is approved for 4. During today’s inspection there was 1 resident in care. LPAs and Licensee Cardona toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedroom contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors and emergency lighting were all in working order. Fire extinguishers were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility.LPA interviewed one staff and one client, and interviews did not reveal any licensing or regulatory concerns. LPA reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Brenda Cardona to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2024
Aug 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an announced Pre-Licensing visit to observe the facility’s physical plant for compliance with Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations and California Health & Safety Code. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit to Licensee Brenda Cardona. The facility fire clearance was granted on 06/13/24 and reflected that the facility was approved for 4 non-ambulatory residents aged 60 and above. The facility's fire clearance did not include endorsements for delayed-egress doors or secured perimeter. The submitted facility sketch was consistent with the current layout of the facility. LPA Rodgers toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were well lit and free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms allowed for easy passage and contained the required furnishings. Toilets, sinks, and showers were in working order. During today’s visit, LPA, accompanied by Licensee Brenda Cardona, checked Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were also compliant: Bathroom #1 sink was 113 F, Bathroom #2 sink was 113.0 F The facility’s ambient internal temperature was complaint at 75 degrees.. The facility has enough linens, hygiene supplies, cooking and dining supplies, and perishable and non-perishable food for future resident use. All kitchen appliances were in working order. The facility has sufficient space and equipment to facilitate laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility has locked areas for storage of sharp objects, medication, and confidential resident and staff records. (CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C, NEXT PAGE) (CONTINUED FROM LIC 809) No bodies of water were observed at the facility. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to residents. Per Licensee Cardona, no firearms or ammunition are or will be stored at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all operational. All fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last twelve months. A complete first aid kit was present. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. The items reviewed were complaint with Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations and California Health & Safety Code. The applicant passed the pre-licensing inspection. LPA also reviewed the Component III Training with Cardona on 08/22/24. Cardona was advised that the facility’s application is pending management final review and approval. An exit interview was conducted with Cardona, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2024
Aug 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: Initial Capacity: 4 Census (if any clients in care): 0 COMP II Participants: Name, Title Interview Method: Telephone interview On 0801/2024, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County