Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Opalec Board and Care
Small home·Licensed for 6·San Diego, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,350 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,350
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 15, 2024 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitJanuary 26, 2026CDSS inspection record
Opalec Board and Care is a small care home in San Diego — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2015. Bedridden care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Opalec Board and Care
Is Opalec Board and Care licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Opalec Board and Care licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Opalec Board and Care been cited?
1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.
Is Opalec Board and Care still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Opalec Board and Care cost?
$4,350 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,550–$5,350. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 49 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,950 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 49 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Opalec Board and Care take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Opalec, Lilia M, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Paradise Valley Hospital is 0.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Opalec Board and Care keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Opalec Board and Care license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “OPALEC BOARD AND CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #374603444. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Opalec, Lilia M, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 12 state inspection visits since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is January 26, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,350a month to start
Likely $3,550–$5,350
From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,350a month
Likely $3,550–$5,550
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$4,350likely $3,550–$5,350
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,550–$5,550
- $4,350
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,150–$8,700
- $6,350
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
11 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,400–$4,700.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Daleina's Home CareNational City · 0.4 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Morningside ManorSan Diego · 1.0 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa Victoria Care HomeSan Diego · 1.1 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ideal Home CareNational City · 1.5 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sarasona Home CareBonita · 1.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Vmb Ultimate CareNational City · 2.0 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Archangel's Residential CareSan Diego · 2.1 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Seniors Dignity Home and CareSan Diego · 2.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mayflower Home CareSan Diego · 2.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Royal Garden Guest HomeChula Vista · 2.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Warm Heart Senior LivingBonita · 2.9 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 5638 Plumas Street, San Diego, CA 92139Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2023, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2015. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 26, 2026.
- On file since
- 2023
- State visits
- 12
- Most recent visit
- January 26, 2026
- Occupied · August 15, 2024 visit
- 5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 22, 2024 to August 15, 2024. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations1typical 0
- Type B citations1typical 0
- Substantiated allegations2typical 0
- Total complaints3typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2015.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 9 of 10 documents
Jan 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Noel Firmeanes. Administrator Arnold Arenas arrived shortly after. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of 6 non-ambulatory residents age 60 and over. There is a hospice waiver for 3. During today’s inspection, there were a total of 5 residents in care, and per medical records, four were non-ambulatory and 1 was ambulatory. This facility does not feature a secured perimeter or delayed egress doors. LPA, accompanied by Caregiver Noel, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was a comfortable temperature. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE, LIC 809-C) (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1, LIC 809) No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per Arnold Arenas, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and residents. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Licensee also presented proof of current/active business liability insurance. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Arnold, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 26, 2026
Jan 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Lilia Opalec. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of 6 non-ambulatory residents age 60 and over. There is a hospice waiver for 3. During today’s inspection, there were a total of 5 residents in care, and per medical records, four were non-ambulatory and 1 was ambulatory. This facility does not feature a secured perimeter or delayed egress doors. LPA, accompanied by Licensee, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was a comfortable temperature. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant: Bathroom #1 sink was 116.4 F, and Bathroom #2 sink was 114.9 F. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE, LIC 809-C) (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1, LIC 809) No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per Lilia Opalec, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and clients. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Licensee also presented proof of current/active business liability insurance. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Lilia Opalec, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during to Lilia.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2025
Sep 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced Case Management Visit to correct/amend a report. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Noel Firmanas, Caregiver and Lilia Oplaec, Administrator arrived during the visit. During today's visit, LPA formally amended a prior facility evaluation report from August 15, 2024 and discussed the changes made with the Licensee. Licensee agreed to remove any copies of the prior report they have, substituting/replacing with the amended report. LPA amended the citation from a B deficiency to an A deficiency. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted with Lilia Oplaec, Administrator, to whom a copy of the amended report, this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024
Aug 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff locked resident in a room
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA gained access to the facility, identified herself, and met with Lilia Oplaec, Licensee to discuss the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted the initial investigation visit on April 2, 2021, and was able to interview clients, facility staff, and outside sources. LPA also reviewed records and conducted a physical inspection of the facility. It was alleged that staff locked resident in a room. Interviews revealed that there were two outside witnesses that observed the lock on the door where the lock was on the outside leading into the hallway. Interviews revealed that both witnesses asked the staff to remove and or reverse the lock. Interviews with staff stated that there was never a lock on the door although two credible witnesses stated there was. The investigation produced supporting witness statements to substantiate the staff locked the resident in a room. Based on the evidence obtained from interviews, the complaint allegation is substantiated. A deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulation An exit interview was conducted with Lilia Oplaec, Licensee and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) was provided at the conclusion of the visit. Substantiated It was also alleged that staff are not dispensing resident's medications as prescribed. Interviews revealed the residents medications are given as prescribed. Interviews revealed the resident took medications and needed assistance with them. Interviews revealed they follow what the doctor says and then gives it to the residents. They make sure that all the residents have a prescription. It was also alleged that staff are financially abusing resident. Interviews revealed that the staff are not financially abusing the resident. Interviews revealed the resident handled their own financial obligations. Interviews revealed that R1 stayed one week and then their family moved them out and put a stop payment on the rent for that month. The investigation did not produce supporting evidence or supporting witness statements to substantiate staff gave resident a bucket to use as a toilet, staff are not dispensing resident's medications as prescribed, and staff are financially abusing resident. Based on the evidence obtained from interviews, and record review, the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Lilia Oplaec, Licensee and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) was provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210324111143
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 30, 2024
Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(6) To leave or depart the facility at any time and to not be locked into any room, building, or on facility premises by day or night. This does not prohibit a licensee from establishing house rules, such as locking doors at night to protect residents, or barring windows against intruders, with permission from the Department. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Interviews with outside source confirmed R1 had a lock on their bedroom door leading to the hallway. This posed a potential health and safety risk to 1 of 5 (R1) residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2024
Plan of correction: Lincesee removed the lock on the door while LPA was at facility. Licensee will also have training for all staff by an outside vendor regarding persoanl rights of residents. Training/ documents/ and sign in sheet is due to CCl by 08/30/2024.
Jul 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to discuss the delivery of the plan of correction. LPA identified herself, was granted entry, and stated the purpose of the visit to confirm a plan of correction issued on 6/4/2024, with Care giver Carlido Miranda LPA conducted a welfare check as well as a phone call to the licensee and an email to the administrator. Plan of Correction that was issued on 6/4/2024 was extended to 7/18/2024. An exit interview was conducted with Care giver Carlido Miranda. A copy of this report and Licensee Appeal Rights (9058 03/22) were provided to Administrator after the conclusion of the visit,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2024
Jun 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately restrained resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate a complaint regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Lilia Opalec, Licensee, and the purpose of today's visit was disclosed. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility, observed residents in care, reviewed and obtained copies of facility records, and interviewed residents and the Licensee. The facility is licensed to serve six (6) elderly residents, all of whom may be non-ambulatory. A hospice waiver is approved for three (3) residents and the facility is in compliance with the hospice waiver requirements. On May 30, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging inappropriatly restraint to Resident #1.(R1) resulted in R1 barricaded in their beds by full bed rails. [Continued on 9099-C] Substantiated [Continued on LIC9099-C]. During the investigation, LPA Rodgers collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation, conducted interviews as well as contacting two hospice care facilities to acquire documents. Observation by LPA Rodgers visit revealed full bed rails were on R1 bed. Interviews with staff confirmed full bed rails (2 half rails to make a whole bed rail) have been used since move in date of R1. A records review with Hospice organization (dated March 22, 2024) and Physican's report (dated March 2024) revealed there are no orders in place for full bed rails. The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation and based on interviews, record review, and observations, the preponderance of the evidence has been met, therefore, this allegation is deemed substantiated. The following deficiency is cited per CA Code of Regulations Title 22 and noted on the attached LIC9099-D page. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Lilia Opalec, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via hard copy [Continued from 9099] According to S1’s LIC602 Physician’s Report (dated 05//2024): C1 has a Diagnosis of Dementia. Their doctor determined that C1 is only oriented to self only, able to follow instructions, able to communicate her needs. C1 demonstrated to LPA that they were not oriented to place, and time. However, is aware of likes and dislikes and makes the needs known to staff. LPA observations and interviews revealed staff conducts themselves in a professional manner and treats residents with dignity and thoughtfulness. LPA did not encounter allegations or evidence of S1 or other staff treating residents without respect. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Lilia Opalec. Appeal Rights (LIC 9098 01/16) along with a copy of this report was provided to Licensee Lilia Opalec and their signature on this form confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240531101047
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87608(a)(5)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 4, 2024
B) Bed rails that extend the entire length of the bed are prohibited except for residents who are currently receiving hospice care and have a hospice care plan that specifies the need for full bed rails. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out of 3 residents did not have a hospice care plan that specified a full bed rail was needed or an approval from the Department which posed a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee removed the the lower half bed rail (which made a full rail) and will attend Postural Support training. Proof of training due by POC due date. 7/3/2024.
Feb 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident Staff not meeting resident's needs
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced complaint visit to start an investigation on the above-mentioned allegations. LPA gained access to the facility, identified herself, and met with Lilia Opalec to discuss the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews, made observations, and obtained and reviewed pertinent records. It was alleged that staff hit resident. Interviews revealed that the facility has two staff that are live in and assists the residents. Interviews with staff revealed they have not hit any of the residents. Interviews with residents revealed they have not seen staff hit any of the residents and that they personally have not been hit by a caregiver while at the facility. Interviews with residents did not produce any evidence to show that staff hit resident. It was alleged that staff are not meeting resident's needs. Interviews revealed that they are able to get snacks, food and drinks at any time. Interviews revealed they have not been denied any drinks or food. Staff interviews revealed they offer the residents drinks through out the day and they also offer food and snacks as well outside of times the residents have breakfast, lunch and dinner. Interviews revealed if a resident asks for food or drink they are given the items. Interviews revealed the residents with Dementia are closely monitored regarding their food and drink intake but they are never denied any food or drinks. Interviews with residents did not produce any evidence to show the facilty is not meeting their needs. Based on the evidence obtained from interviews and records review, the complaint allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Lilia Opalec and a copy of this report along with\ Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) was provided at the conclusion of the visit Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240215102408
Feb 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dawn Segura made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a Plan of Correction (POC) visit to confirm that a citation issued on January 24, 2024 has been corrected. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Lilia Opalec, Licensee, and the purpose of today's visit was disclosed. The following citation has been reviewed: 87303(e)(2) Maintenance and Operation. (e) Water supplies and plumbing fixtures shall be maintained as follows: (2) Faucets used by residents for personal care such as shaving and grooming shall deliver hot water. Hot water temperature controls shall be maintained to automatically regulate the temperature of hot water used by residents to attain a temperature of not less than 105 degree F (41 degrees C) and not more than 120 degree F (49 degrees C). During today’s visit, LPA tested the water temperature in a bathroom used by residents and observed the water temperature to measure 109.3 degrees Fahrenheit. The citation will be cleared as of today’s visit. This report was discussed with Lilia Opalec, and copies of the report and Licensee Rights (01/2016) were provided to her at the conclusion of the visit. The licensee’s signature on this form acknowledges receipt of copies of the rights and this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2024
Jan 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dawn Segura conducted an unannounced required annual inspection. LPA identified herself and was granted entry into the facility. Licensee, Lilia Opalec, to whom LPA disclosed the purpose of the visit, arrived a short time later. According to the facility’s license, the facility is licensed for six (6) residents, all of whom may be non-ambulatory. During today’s inspection, there were six (6) residents in care. The facility also has an approved waiver for 3 hospice residents. LPA, accompanied by licensee, toured the interior and exterior of the facility. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Doors, windows and screens were present and sinks and toilets were in working order. Hygiene supplies and Personal Protective Equipment were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate visitation, meetings, and activities. Hot water temperature in bathroom sinks in bathrooms that are used by residents initially measured at 152.3 and 153.1 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water heater was adjusted during the visit and signs advising of the high hot water temperatures were posted in each bathroom. Hot water temperature measured at 141.2 degrees Fahrenheit at the end of the visit. There were no sharp objects or open-faced heaters accessible to residents; however, LPA observed Comet cleanser with bleach stored in a kitchen cabinet that was accessible to residents with a diagnosis of dementia. A fireplace with appropriate screening was observed in the living area of the home. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detector, and facility telephone were all working. Refrigerator and freezer were operational. There was at least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked cabinets. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. LPA interviewed staff and clients. LPA also reviewed staff and client records/files. Resident 1’s (R1) file contained a Physician’s Report; however, the last two pages of the report were missing. Staff file contained proof of current first aid and negative TB test result. Confidential records were stored in locked area. Deficiencies were cited during today's visit, and plans of correction were jointly developed with the licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Lilia Opalec, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 809-D, LIC 9102TAs, LIC 9102TV, the LIC 811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the end of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Daleina's Home Care
National City · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$4,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
Parkview Memory Care at Paradise Village
National City · Large community · 0.4 mi away
$7,800 a month to start · Listed by the home
Paradise Valley Manor
National City · Large community · 0.5 mi away
$4,400 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Cedars @ Paradise Village
National City · Large community · 0.6 mi away
$4,190 a month to start · Listed by the home
Pacific Coast Assisted Living
National City · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Paradise Hills Senior Living
San Diego · Small home · 0.7 mi away
$4,850 a month to start · Covelight estimate