Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Oakview

Large community·Licensed for 63·Thousand Oaks, California

Licensed since 2008Licence #197607372
  • Care approvals on fileDementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,700 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,400–$7,200
  • Home sizeLicensed for 63Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit50 of 63 beds occupiedOctober 22, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMay 8, 2026CDSS inspection record

Oakview is a large care community in Thousand Oaks — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 63 residents since 2008. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Oakview

Is Oakview licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Oakview licensed for?

63 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Oakview been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Oakview still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Oakview cost?

$5,700 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,400–$7,200. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 121 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,094 to $5,961 a month, and the middle figure is $4,195 (n = 121 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Oakview take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Oakview Hc LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Los Robles Hospital & Medical Center is 1.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Oakview keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Oakview license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “OAKVIEW”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197607372. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 63 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Oakview Hc LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 8, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY LICENSED FOR SIXTY-THREE (63) RESIDENTS AGES SIXTY (60) AND ABOVE. ALL MAY BE NON-AMB. APPROVED FOR DEMENTIA CARE PER 87706(87725) IN "THE GARDENS". DELAYED EGRESS & WONDERGUARD DOORS APPROVED. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER INCREASE FROM FIVE (5) TO NINE (9)

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,700a month to start

Likely $4,400–$7,200

From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,700a month

Likely $4,400–$7,350

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,700likely $4,400–$7,200

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,400–$7,350
$5,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,300–$10,300
$7,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

15 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,800–$5,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 15 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 3557 Campus Dr., Thousand Oaks, CA 91360Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2008. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 8, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
10
Most recent visit
May 8, 2026
Occupied · October 22, 2025 visit
50 of 63 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 17, 2024 to October 22, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 2
  • Total complaints4typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2008.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025330202433120231102022110

The last 36 months — 8 of 10 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
May 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted an unannounced Case Management – Incident visit for the purpose of investigating a self reported incident by the facility. Upon arrival LPA met with Executive Director (ED) James MacKay and Assisted Living Director (ALD) Shaulett Dela Cruz. Reason for the visit was discussed. On 05/06/2026 late afternoon, it was discovered of a possible psychological abuse. It was reported that on 05/2/2026, night shift staff (S1) refused to assist R1 stating "you can do it yourself". In addition it was reported that S1 would not assist R1 with care needs and made R1 fearful. ED and ALD cross reported incident to law enforcement and the Long Term Care Ombudsman. Law enforcement arrived to the facility on 05/6/2026 and spoke with R1. ADL and ED also interviewed R1. Initially R1 reported that S1 pushed resident down on the toilet and later recanted and stated that S1 did not touch R1. R1 reported that S1 would not assist R1 with toileting needs and said to R1 "you can do it yourself". S1 is placed on leave pending facility internal investigation. At approximately 1:30pm, LPA interviewed staff, reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the incident in question. From approximately 2:00pm-3:30pm, LPA and ALD toured the facility and LPA interviewed a total of nine (9) residents. Based on interviews and records review no immediate or potential health and safety concerns were observed during the visit. ADL reported that they will be conducting an in-service training for all caregivers on better approach technics on encouraging residents independence. No deficiencies cited at this time. LPA has determined should further investigation be warranted, LPA will return at a later date. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2026
Mar 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Zabel Chochian arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival, LPA met with Executive Director (ED), James Mackay, and Assisted Living Director, Shaulett Dela Cruz. The reason for the visit was stated. Entrance interview conducted. Copy of the residents and staff roster obtained. Current census is 52 of which three (3) residents are receiving hospice services and ten (10) residents are receiving home health services. Facility's approved Infection Control Plan and Emergency Disaster Plan was reviewed with the ED. Both plans have been reviewed with in the year and no changes were made. The facility has a comprehensive disaster plan. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly as per regulation; monthly fire drills conducted the last one being a fire drill and was conducted in 02/2026 and major disaster drills conducted quarterly; last one being an earthquake drill (great shake out) in 10/2025. At approximately 12:30 p.m., LPA, ED, Assistant Director Shaulett Dela Cruz and Safety Director John Miller and his team toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and community is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The facility is a two story building; units are designated for assisted living residents on the first and second floor, and a separate unit on the first floor is designated for dementia care. There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards observed. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature. The fire extinguishers were charged and last serviced 1/23/2026. Smoke Detectors and Carbon Monoxide detectors were tested by Service Pro-Fire Protection Inc. on 12/8/2025; all were found functioning properly. Individual smoke and carbon monoxide detectors in resident rooms were tested during today's visit by the Safety team. Seven out seven room smoke and carbon monoxide detectors tested were operational.(Continue to Lic809c) There are four (4) stairwells that all have emergency evacuation chairs. ACTIVITIES: Planned activities are offered, and the activity schedule was posted. Activity rooms and common spaces appeared clean and in good repair. KITCHEN: At the time of the visit, there was a sufficient supply of perishable and nonperishable food. Refrigerator, freezer, and pantry/storage area were observed; food labels were observed and checked for expiration dates, and food labels had dates clearly marked. The facility also has an emergency supply of food and water good for current census (residents and staff). The weekly menu was posted by the dining room entrance. Appliances appeared to be clean and in operable condition. Dining room also observed clean and appropriate furnished with tables and chairs. BEDROOMS: LPA toured ten (10) randomly chosen rooms; two (2) in memory care, and eight (8) in assisted living. Rooms appeared clean, well kept, with sufficient lighting and appropriately furnished. Eight (8) out of ten 10) residents were interviewed during the tour. RESTROOMS: Restrooms on all floors were clean and sanitary. Restrooms were fully stocked with supplies. The hot water temperature was tested on all floors and ranged from 107.5- and 118.7-degrees Fahrenheit. OUTSIDE AREAS: LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture with a covered shaded area for residents. There was an enclosed patio for residents who reside in the memory care unit. MEDICATIONS: Medications are centrally stored in the medication room; there is a medication room on each of the two (2) floors and one (1) in the Memory Care Unit. Random resident medication review conducted on each floor medication room including the memory care unit; PRNs observed with physicians order on file; residents medications observed recorded on the centrally stored log; Medications appeared to be given as prescribed. Some records were missing start dates; staff recorded the start dates from the bubble pack. In-service training provided during today's visit. No citations issued during today's visit. LPA will return to review personnel and resident records on a later date. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2026
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in Care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian arrived at the facility to initate complaint investigation for the above allegation. Upon arrival LPA met with staff and shortly after with the Executive Director (ED) James Mackay. Reason for the visit was explained. On 10/15/2025 the Department received a complaint regarding the following allegation: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care. To investigate this complaint, LPA obtained pertinent documents relevant to the investigation and interviewed the ED at approximately 12:45pm. Interview with the ED and documentation received revealed that the individual identified in the complaint report did not reside at this facility which is licensed by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). However, it was confirmed through record review that the individual resides at the Oakview Skilled Nursing Facility which is on the same property and is licensed by a different regulatory agency of which CCLD has no jurisdiction over. The complaint will be appropriately cross-reported. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED at this time. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is either false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2025 · control 29-AS-20251015162546
Apr 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff mismanaged residents medication Licensee does not have enough staff to meet the needs of residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with James Mackay and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. On 09/23/2024, Community Care Licensing Division received the above complaint allegations. It was reported that resident #1 (R1) was in sever pain on the weekend of 09/21/2024 and was not administer Morphine. It was also reported that the facility staff admit to missing the medication delivery and noted that they didn't have the staffing. No additional information was provided by the reporting party to support allegations made. Email notification was sent to the reporting party however no return response was received. Following is a summary of the investigation finding: On 10/01/2024, from approximately 3:15pm-4pm, LPA reviewed resident #1’s (R1) records which included R1’s Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction records; MARs, Controlled Drug Record and Controlled Substance Inventory form. (Continue to LIC9099c.) Unsubstantiated LPA also interviewed staff and reviewed staffing schedules. Furthermore, during an annual inspection on 03/26/2025 randomly selected residents were interviewed regarding staffing and medication services. Regarding allegation “Facility staff mismanaged resident’s medication”: Interview with staff and records review revealed that Resident 1 (R1) lived at the facility until they passed away on 09/23/2024; R1 had a prescription for Morphine Sulfate 15mg and 20mg (tablets); records noted last fill date of morphine medication was on 09/21/2024 (20mg-tablets-as needed 3x a day). Medication Administration Records (MAR) indicated that on 09/21/2024, R1 received Morphine, which was prescribed by a physician solely for pain and comfort. Interviews with staff indicated that they did not have a problem filling R1’s medications on time. Staff denied the allegations. Records reviewed indicated morphine medication was provided according to physician and hospice instructions. Further interviews with the medication technicians and facility LVN confirmed that all controlled drugs are stored separately, recorded and inventoried at every shift. According to staff they never ran out of R1’s morphine. Interview with staff and records reviewed indicated that morphine was administered to R1 by a hospice and facility nurse following physician and hospice instructions. Controlled Substance Inventory form indicated facility had a supply of morphine for R1 until they passed on 09/23/2024. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may be valid, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation “Facility staff mismanaged residents medication” is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding allegation “Licensee does not have enough staff to meet the needs of residents in care”: Interview with staff and facility records reviewed revealed facility staffing for the Assisted Living (AL) side with census of 35 residents, consist of three (3) caregivers; two (2) medtechs and Wellness nurse for both AM and PM shifts; NOC shift: one (1) caregiver and one (1) medtech; for the Memory Care unit with census of 15. Additionally, Five randomly selected residents of the assisted living side were interviewed and all five expressed no issues or concern with facility managing medications and care service. LPA attempted to interview residents in the memory care unit however residents were unable to comprehend questions asked due to lack of capacity. Based on the above information gathered although the allegation may be valid, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred; therefore, the above allegation “Licensee does not have enough staff to meet the needs of residents in care” is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240923155324
Mar 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Zabel Chochian arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival, LPA met with Executive Director, Jeannette Ruggiero, Assistant James Mackay, and Assisted Living Director, Shaulett Dela Cruz. The reason for the visit was stated. Entrance interview conducted and check list provided. At approximately 12 p.m., LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and community is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The facility is a two story building; units are designated for assisted living residents on the first and second floor, and a separate unit on the first floor is designated for dementia care. There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards observed. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature. The fire extinguishers were charged and last serviced 04/19/2024. Smoke Detectors and Carbon Monoxide detectors were tested by Fire Protection Inc. on 12/20/2024; all were found functioning properly. Facility elevator was operating properly. There are four (4) stairwells that all have emergency evacuation chairs. ACTIVITIES: Planned activities are offered, and the activity schedule was posted. Activity rooms and common spaces appeared clean and in good repair. Currently group activities are on hold due to the outbreak. KITCHEN: At the time of the visit, there was a sufficient supply of perishable and nonperishable food. Refrigerator, freezer, and pantry area were observed; food labels were inspected and checked for dates and expiration dates, and food labels had dates clearly marked. The facility also has an emergency supply of food and water. The weekly menu was posted by the dining room entrance. Appliances appeared to be clean and in operable condition. At this time due to the outbreak dining room is closed and meals are being served to residents in their room. Continued on LIC 809C... BEDROOMS: LPA toured seven randomly chosen rooms; two (2) in memory care, and five (5) in assisted living. Rooms appeared clean, well kept, with sufficient lighting and appropriately furnished. Five (5) out of seven (7) residents were interviewed during the tour. RESTROOMS: Restrooms on all floors were clean and sanitary. Restrooms were fully stocked with supplies. The hot water temperature was tested on all floors and ranged from 107.5- and 120-degrees Fahrenheit. OUTSIDE AREAS: LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture with a covered shaded area for residents. There was an enclosed patio for residents who reside in the memory care unit. MEDICATIONS: Medications are centrally stored in the medication room; there is a medication room on each of the two (2) floors. Random resident medication review conducted; PRNs observed with physicians order on file; residents medications observed recorded on the centrally stored log; Medications appeared to be given as prescribed. Some records were missing start dates; staff recorded the start dates from the bubble pack. In-service training provided. RECORDS REVIEW: LPA reviewed seven resident records at approximately 3p.m. All seven (7) resident files were reviewed for, but not limited to, the following: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, LIC627(c) Consent for Treatment form, personal rights form, and current needs and services plan. All records were in order. Five (5) personnel files were reviewed at approximately 4:30 p.m. for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All records observed in order. The facility has a comprehensive disaster plan. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly as per regulation; the last one being a fire drill and was conducted in 01/2025 (1st shift); 2/2025 (2nd shift); third shift is scheduled in 3/2025. No citations issued during today's visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff handled resident in a rough manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted a subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the above listed allegation. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by front desk staff. LPA met with Administrator Jeannette Ruggiero at 02:52PM and explained the reason for today’s visit. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial visit conducted on 06/04/2024, LPA interviewed Administrator at 04:10PM, toured the facility at 04:38PM, interviewed Resident #1 (R1) at 04:43PM, conducted interviews with additional management members at 04:59PM, and obtained relevant documents and staff contact information. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed documents, additional information provided and conducted interviews. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated The complaint alleges that facility staff handled resident #1 (R1) in a rough manner based on a statement R1 made indicating Staff #1 (S1) “threw [R1] like a sack of potatoes.” Record review revealed that R1 has a diagnosis of dementia and resides in the facility’s memory care unit. Interview with R1 revealed that S1 is their favorite staff, S1 is very strong and has no trouble lifting R1 by themselves without additional staff assistance. R1 indicated they enjoy S1’s company, as S1 understands R1’s sense of humor and R1 stated that S1 is nice to them. When LPA asked R1 if S1 had ever been rough with them, R1 denied this ever occurring and reiterated that S1 is strong. LPA reviewed the police report taken on the night of the alleged incident. In their interview with police, R1 denied that anyone was rough with them. Additionally, S1 denied the allegation and other staff interviewed indicated they have never witnessed S1, nor any other staff handle any residents in a rough manner. Staff that regularly work with R1 stated that R1 does have a sense of humor and they could see R1 saying that as a joke. No bruising was noted on R1’s body on the night of the alleged incident nor in the days following the alleged incident. Communication with R1’s family revealed that R1 had used this same phrase to describe how a family member had pulled R1 to a seated position. Based on interview and record review, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred, therefore, the allegation that “facility staff handled resident in a rough manner” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240531145527
May 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an initial complaint inspection at the facility today. LPA arrived at 09:55AM and met with Administrator Jeanette Ruggiero and Assisted Living Director Shaulett Dela Cruz. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA interviewed both facility managers at 10:00AM, toured the facility at 10:30AM, and conducted interviews with residents, staff and other relevant parties from 10:40AM to 02:21PM. Additionally, LPA reviewed the facility's incident report that was submitted to the Regional Office related to the complaint allegation as well as a police report filed. The following was then determined: It was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) was providing care to Resident #1 (R1) when S1 hit R1 in the back. Incident report reviewed indicated that a witness was entering the room while S1 was providing care and the witness overheard a sound that appeared to be a slap. R1 was then heard saying "please don't hit me." Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Substantiated While S1 initially stated that R1's care that day was typical and without incident, S1 then stated that R1 grabbed S1's hand and squeezed it, causing pain to S1's fingers and that S1 then in turn grabbed R1's hand. Interviews revealed that other staff characterized S1 as "very stubborn" and wants to do things their own way, rather than how the residents prefer their care. Staff indicated there are residents who have reported to them they do not want S1 working with them due to S1 being rough. Staff interviewed indicated R1 is very respectful, gentle and has never shown aggressive behavior. All persons interviewed agreed that the allegation S1 made about R1 grabbing their hand and causing pain to S1's fingers is very uncharacteristic of R1's behavior. Interview with R1 revealed their story aligned with that of the witness, including S1 appearing agitated, the sound of a slap on exposed skin and R1 stating "please don't hit me" following the sound heard. R1 indicated S1 told them they needed to hurry and to stop asking questions. Then S1 hit R1 on the back with an open hand, but stated that it wasn't too hard. Nurse observed R1 and did not note any marks on their back or any part of their body following the incident. Police report reviewed also indicated the same timeline of events, including a hit or slap with an open hand to R1's back. Other residents management interviewed indicated S1 tends to get frustrated, is in a hurry often, and does things their own way. No other residents the LPA interviewed indicated they have witnessed or been subjected to any physical aggression from S1 or any other staff. Management indicated that S1 had previously been counseled regarding their approach with the residents, but that there had been no previous reports of any physical abuse or altercations. S1 was placed on leave as soon as management was made aware of this incident involving R1 and has not returned to the facility since the date of the incident. Management indicated that due to this incident and the previous counseling that S1 had received, S1 will not be returning to employment at the facility. Based on information gathered in interviews and record review, the allegation that "staff hit resident" is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 9099-D): Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights were reviewed. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240515160652

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: May 17, 2024

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) (3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature... interfering with daily living functions such as eating, sleeping, or elimination. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section, as R1 indicated S1 hit them and S1 admitted to grabbing R1's hand, which poses an immediate personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator indicated that as of a 03:00PM meeting today, S1 is no longer employed with the facility. As interviews revealed this incident appeared to be isolated to S1 only, no additional staff training is required. POC cleared.

Mar 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Teresa Camara and Martha Arroyo arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The last annual conducted at this facility was on 01/13/2023. Upon arrival, LPAs met with Executive Director, Jeannette Ruggiero, and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview. LPAs toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and community is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. KITCHEN: At the time of the visit, there was a sufficient supply of perishable and nonperishable food. Refrigerator, freezer, and pantry area were observed; food labels were inspected and checked for dates and expiration dates, and food labels had dates clearly marked. The facility also has an emergency supply of food and water. The weekly menu was posted by the dining room entrance. Appliances appeared to be in operable condition. COMMON AREAS: The facility is a two story building; units are designated for assisted living residents on the first and second floor, and a separate unit on the first floor is designated for dementia residents. There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards observed. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature. The fire extinguishers were charged and last serviced 01/13/2024. Smoke Detectors and Carbon Monoxide detectors were tested within the past 12 months and were operable. Facility elevator was operating properly. There are four (4) stairwells that all have emergency evacuation chairs. ACTIVITIES: Planned activities are offered, and the activity schedule was posted. Activity rooms and common spaces appeared clean and in good repair. Continued on LIC 809C... Continued from LIC 809... BEDROOMS: LPAs toured ten randomly chosen rooms; three (3) in memory care, and seven (7) in assisted living. Rooms appeared clean, well kept, with sufficient lighting and appropriately furnished. RESTROOMS: Restrooms on all floors were clean and sanitary. Restrooms were fully stocked with supplies. The hot water temperature was tested on all floors and ranged from 109.2- and 120-degrees Fahrenheit. OUTSIDE AREAS: LPAs observed appropriate outdoor furniture with a covered shaded area for residents. There was an enclosed patio for residents who reside in the memory care unit. There was a water waterfall; however, water level was compliant at the time of the visit. RECORDS: LPA’s reviewed Resident Records at 12:27 p.m. and Personnel Records at 11:40 a.m. Five (5) resident files were reviewed for, but not limited to, the following: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, LIC627(c) Consent for Treatment form, and current needs and services plan. All records were in order. Five (5) personnel files and the current Executive Director’s file were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All records were in order. The facility has a comprehensive disaster plan. The last fire inspection was completed on 12/27/2023 and was found to be in compliance with Fire Code Regulations at the time of inspection. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly as per regulation; the last one being a fire drill and was conducted on 01/26/2024. Continued on LIC 809C... Continued from LIC 809C... MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at approximately 2:17 p.m.; medications are centrally stored in the medication room; there is a medication room on each of the two (2) floors. PRNs have physicians order on file. Medications appeared to be given as prescribed. INTERVIEWS: LPAs interviewed three (3) residents and three (3) staff members during the inspection; no concerns were noted. Exit interview conducted. No deficiencies cited. Report was reviewed and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County