Small home · Licensed for 6 · Redding
New Vision Services Senior Care 3
2800 Squire Ave, Redding, CA 96002Licensed since 2020
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 27, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
Not on file: bedridden approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER 6 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 27, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 27, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 27, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for New Vision Services Senior Care 3: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Typical starting rate
$5,000a month to start
Likely $3,650–$6,850
From homes this size in Shasta County · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,000likely a month
Starting monthly rate$5,000likely $3,650–$6,850
Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 5 small homes publish in Shasta County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$6,950
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,650–$10,000
- $7,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes7 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,000 to $5,000
- Spring Hills Assisted LivingRedding · 1.3 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Oaks Senior LivingRedding · 2.2 mi · Mid-size home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Life PasticheRedding · 4.2 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunset Comfort CareRedding · 5.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Redbud Care HomeRedding · 5.9 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Westside Assisted LivingRedding · 5.9 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Hallmark NorthRedding · 5.9 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure
Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 5 small homes publish in Shasta County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
2800 Squire Ave, Redding, CA 96002Address from the public record · October 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Shasta Regional Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.9 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 27, 2026 · License #455002745 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 3 of 6 documents
20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kerry Hiratsuka arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-year annual inspection and met with Melissa Farley and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Hiratsuka and Administrator toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. The LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked area. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms furnished with at least one night stand, bed, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed the resident bathrooms to be clean, and properly supplied. Residents have sufficient supplies for personal hygiene products. Common Areas: These included but are not limited to the living area, activity area, and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no firearms or bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: A review of facility files was initiated. The LPA reviewed four staff, and two resident files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Medications: Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was providethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Mar 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/04/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-year annual inspection and met with Melissa Johnson and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila and Administrator toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. The LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked area. Water temperature measured within the required range. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms furnished with at least one night stand, bed, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed the resident bathrooms to be clean, and properly supplied. Residents have sufficient supplies for personal hygiene products. Common Areas: These included but are not limited to the living area, activity area, and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no firearms or bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: A review of facility files was initiated. The LPA observed documentation of the Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill. Facility records are stored inaccessible to residents. The LPA reviewed four (4) staff, and four (4) resident files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Medications: During the facility visit a medications review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record log. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Mar 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/04/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-year annual inspection and met with Melissa Johnson and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila and Administrator toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. The LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked area. Water temperature measured at 118 degrees. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms furnished with at least one night stand, bed, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed the resident bathrooms to be clean, and properly supplied. Residents have sufficient supplies for personal hygiene products. Common Areas: These included but are not limited to the living area, activity area, and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no firearms or bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: A review of facility files was initiated. The LPA observed documentation of the Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill. Facility records are stored inaccessible to residents. The LPA reviewed four (4) staff, and four (4) resident files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Medications: During the facility visit a medications review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record log. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 3 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Mar 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Wallace conducted unannounced Required 1 Year Inspection Visit utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; facility administrator and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by administrator. LPA and administrator toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, and common restrooms. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA and facility staff completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. LPA observed hot water temperature was measured at 117.3 degrees Fahrenheit in resident bathroom sink, which is within the required regulation of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Fire Extinguishers were inspected on 12/8/2022 and in compliance. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are in compliance with fire safety. LPA observed centrally stored medications locked up in medication rooms. LPA reviewed three (3) client and three (3) staff files, including criminal record clearances. LPA reviewed Fingerprint clearance and associations to the facility. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA received the following updated documents on today's date: LIC 610-E - Emergency Disaster Plan, Administrator Certificate, and Liability Insurance. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left with administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2023
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 11, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Family was not notified of residents’ pressure ulcer - SUBSTANTIATED Facility is not following doctors ordered diet - SUBSTANTIATED
/11/2022 10:30 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight, made an unannounced visit to the facility and met with house manager Lindsey Domreis. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the results of the complaint investigation of the above allegations. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 Mask, gloves. In addition, LPA was screened by facility staff. During the course of the investigation house manager and 4 staff were interviewed. LPA obtained the following documents to investigate the above allegations: LIC602 Physician's Report, Admission Agreement, LIC603A Resident Appraisal form, List of medications, Staff Roster, Notice of Inability to Continue Care, Text messages, photographs of pressure ulcer and example meal, home health nursing notes. Continued on LIC9099-C Substantiated Family was not notified of residents’ pressure ulcer – SUBSTANTIATED LPA review of documents revealed that starting on 02/09/2022 R1 was being treated in the facility by home health for a stage 2 pressure injury. Various text messages received between 02/05/2022 – 02/07/2022 confirmed that the family was aware that R1 had an on-going spot that was visible during R1’s admission to the facility. On 02/05/2022 the family was notified that the spot opened up and the facility had been treating it for 1 week. At this time family stated they thought the facility would inform them if they were treating R1 for a pressure injury. During staff interviews it was learned that when R1 moved into the facility they already had the pressure injury and the family was aware of it. House manager stated R1’s family member was present in the bathroom when the facility did R1's physical assessment. When R1 moved in R1 had a wound on their hip that had a band aid on it. The family supplied a cream to put on the wound. The wound healed and came back a few times. The family took R1 back to see their doctor in February 2022 and home health was ordered for R1. Administrator texted the family and notified the wound was getting bad again and was not healing. The family said, “I wish you would have told me sooner.” It was determined that although the family was aware that R1 had an ongoing issue with the pressure wound, the family was not notified in a timely manner that the wound had opened up until 1 week after discovery by the facility therefore the allegation is substantiated. Continued on LIC9099-C Facility is not following doctors ordered diet – SUBSTANTIATED LPA review LIC602 Physicians Report dated 12/31/2021 revealed that R1 required a special diet with thickened fluid, pureed diet. Text from family states that LIC602 issued by R1’s physician had “NO” checked in the column for special diet. Daughter took the LIC602 back to the doctor the same day for correction, daughter planned to pick up the LIC602 on 01/05/2022. LPA review of home health nursing notes for R1 revealed that the RN had reviewed a signed order in the facility from R1’s physician that required a pureed diet and thickened fluids. RN confirmed this requirement during telephone call with R1’s physician. RN stated that facility staff informed RN that R1’s DPOA had OK’d for soft foods. RN was not provided any documentation to confirm this. Interview with RN revealed that RN witnessed facility staff feeding R1 cottage cheese and halved strawberries with thin fluids. RN asked why they were not following R1’s diet that was ordered by MD. Facility staff said that R1's family ok'd for R1 to have a soft diet. RN asked the facility staff if R1 had anything in writing saying so, staff said "NO." RN states they followed-up with R1’s family and family deny giving the facility permission in following a different diet than what has been ordered. Three of four staff interviewed stated that they were aware that R1 required a pureed diet. One staff stated that R1 required a soft mechanical diet. Two staff stated that they provided R1 with a pureed diet. One staff stated they work nights and don’t provide food. One staff stated that they provided R1 with soft foods. Continued on LIC9099-C House manager stated that the physician had initially filled out NO to special diet on the LIC602 Physician's Report. A family member then took the Physician’s Report back to R1’s doctor and the doctor changed the form rather than filling out a new form. The date that the doctor made this change is unknown. LPA reviewed a black and white photograph with three bowls, one containing cubed vegetables, the second contains beans, and the third contains an unknown substance. There are handwritten notes in the margins that state “When giving R1 meals they need resemble this picture. She always needs a main, a side, and a veg. R1 can eat soft foods whole like the beans and mixed veggies. Per family members.” The photograph is dated 01/05/2022. House manager stated that she and a family member made the meal together as an example of what R1 should eat and the house manager took a photograph and made the notes. It was determined that even though the family indicated that it was OK for R1 to have a soft diet the facility always has to follow the LIC602 Physicians Report that prescribes the required diet for the resident. LPA requested the LIC602 Physician’s report from the facility three times and all copies that were provided to LPA by the facility indicate that R1 requires a pureed diet. RN witnessed staff giving R1 soft food which is not the prescribed diet for R1. The allegation is substantiated. Based on interviews and evidence obtained during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Appeal rights were provided. Exit interview was conducted and the report was emailed to house manager Lindsey Domereis, and administrator Melissa Johnson.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220321145705
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: Aug 25, 2022
87466 Observation of the Resident - The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs. When changes such as unusual weight gains or losses or deterioration of mental ability or a physical health condition are observed, the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person, if any. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA interviews and records review it was determined that although the family was aware that R1 had an ongoing issue with the pressure wound, the family was not notified in a timely manner that the wound had opened up until 1 week after discovery by the facility which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to review regulation and submit a statement of understanding. Additionally, Administrator to submit a plan of how facility staff will notify physician and responsible party of resident changes in a timely manner. The proof of correction is to be received by LPA Knight by 8/25/2022.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(7) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 25, 2022
87555 General Food Service Requirements - (b) (7) The following food service requirements shall apply: Modified diets prescribed by a resident's physician as a medical necessity shall be provided. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA interviews and records review it was determined that the facility was not adhering to the resident’s prescribed pureed diet as listed on the LIC602 Physicians Report on file at the facility which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to conduct staff training on the requirement that staff follow Physician’s Orders when a resident has a prescribed diet. Administrator to send in-service curriculum and staff attendance sheet with signatures to LPA Knight as proof of correction. The proof of correction is to be received by LPA Knight by 8/25/2022.
Mar 15, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/15/2022 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Misty Valencia, arrived at the facility unannounced on 07/28/2021 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met with Administrator Melissa Johnson and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted Facility Administrator Melissa Johnson and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by Melissa Johnson.. LPA and Administrator toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, and common restrooms.. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA and facility staff completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report emailed to administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2022
4 of 6 beds were occupied at the August 11, 2022 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
New Vision Services, Inc., licensed since 2020.
Operates 5 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- New Vision Services Senior Care 2 · Redding
- New Vision Services Senior Care 1 · Redding
- Country Oaks Senior Living · Redding
- Golden Oaks Senior Living · Redding
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2020, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 6
- Total complaints
- 1
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2020, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 1 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about New Vision Services Senior Care 3
Is New Vision Services Senior Care 3 licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
How many residents is New Vision Services Senior Care 3 licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
Has New Vision Services Senior Care 3 been cited?
0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.
Is New Vision Services Senior Care 3 still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does New Vision Services Senior Care 3 cost?
$5,000 a month to start is typical in Shasta County, likely $3,650–$6,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 5 small homes publish in Shasta County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size in Redding that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does New Vision Services Senior Care 3 take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by New Vision Services, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to New Vision Services, Inc. — at least 7 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Shasta Regional Medical Center is 3.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can New Vision Services Senior Care 3 keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
New Vision Services Senior Care 3 license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “NEW VISION SERVICES SENIOR CARE 3”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #455002745. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- Licensed to New Vision Services, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- 6 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is March 19, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Shasta County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$5,390 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Shasta County