Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Melos Care Home
Small home·Licensed for 6·Thousand Oaks, California
- Care approvals on fileDementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$5,600 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,600–$6,900
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedOctober 28, 2024 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitAugust 11, 2026CDSS inspection record
- Licence holderOyasan, EdwinSince 2019 · 2 licensed homes
Melos Care Home is a small care home in Thousand Oaks — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2019. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Melos Care Home
Is Melos Care Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Melos Care Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Melos Care Home been cited?
1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.
Is Melos Care Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Melos Care Home cost?
$5,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,600–$6,900. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $6,202 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Melos Care Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Oyasan, Edwin, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Los Robles Hospital & Medical Center is 0.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Melos Care Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Melos Care Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “MELOS CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #567609672. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Oyasan, Edwin, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 9 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 11, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved by the state
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 3 residents
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBLUATORY, OF WHICH 3 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 2 RESIDENTS.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,600a month to start
Likely $4,600–$6,900
From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,600a month
Likely $4,600–$7,050
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$5,600likely $4,600–$6,900
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,600–$7,050
- $5,600
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,350–$10,100
- $7,600
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
11 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,950–$6,500.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Colony of Thousand Oaks at VenusThousand Oaks · 0.7 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Enduring Oaks Assisted LivingMoorpark · 3.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Heartland Senior Living at SunnydaleSimi Valley · 7.1 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Via EsmeraldaCamarillo · 7.9 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Nurturing TouchOak Park · 8.1 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Brookhaven AlCamarillo · 8.4 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ocean Breeze at BeechwoodCamarillo · 9.8 mi · Small home$5,700Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Chateau Le Petite IIIWoodland Hills · 13 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- My Home of AgingWoodland Hills · 14 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- 4Th Generation Senior LivingWest Hills · 15 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Elite Retirement ResidenceWest Hills · 15 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 348 W Avenida De Los Arboles, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 11, 2026.
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 9
- Most recent visit
- August 11, 2026
- Occupied · October 28, 2024 visit
- 5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 28, 2024. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations1typical 0
- Type B citations1typical 0
- Substantiated allegations2typical 0
- Total complaints2typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents
Aug 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erica Mosley arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit and entered the facility at 9:24 a.m. Upon arrival, LPA Mosley was greeted by staff who called the Administrator to inform them of the visit. The Administrator, Edwin Paul Oyasan arrived shortly after and the reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview. The LPA and Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The facility is a single-story home located in a residential neighborhood. COMMON AREAS: This includes the living room, and dining room. At the time of the visit, furniture in the common areas was observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. At 12:30 p.m., hardwire combination of smoke, carbon monoxide detectors and fire doors were tested and operational at the time of the visit. The fire extinguisher was observed and fully charged on 06/26/2026. The emergency exiting plans/sketch are posted in every room. The emergency telephone numbers are posted in the common hallway. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common space. Activities were observed in the common areas. The fireplace in the living room was adequately screened. There is a functioning telephone on the premises. Auditory alarms at the entrances and exits were tested and observed to be functional at the time of the visit. INTERVIEWS: Starting at 9:30 a.m. and throughout the visit one (1) staff and two (2) resident interviews were conducted. Staff interview revealed that staff are knowledgeable in Resident rights, different forms of abuse, and reporting procedures. Resident interview revealed that no concerns were noted or voiced at the time of the visit. Residents expressed "They are like family here". Report Continued on LIC 809-C PAGE 2... (PAGE 2) Report Continued from LIC 809-C...KITCHEN: The LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area. Knives and sharps were observed in a locked cabinet under the sink. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food. Refrigerator and food pantry were checked for proper labels and expiration dates. The kitchen faucet was measured for hot water temperature, and it measured 111.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Cleaning supplies and other chemicals are kept in the garage locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed a fire extinguisher mounted on the wall to be serviced on 6/26/26. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) total bedrooms in the facility; three (3) bedrooms are designated as private, single occupancy, resident rooms and one (1) is designated as a shared, double occupancy resident room. Two (2) out of four (4) resident rooms have exits to the exterior. All passageways were observed to be clear of obstructions. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. The bedrooms were large enough to allow for easy passage between the beds and furniture with a wheelchair or walker. In addition, no bedroom was used as a passageway to another room, bath or toilet. All rooms were free of odors. All window screens were clean and maintained in good repair. Each bedrooms have its own supply of linens. There is no staff room and Administrator stated that staff remain awake at night. RESTROOMS: There are two (2) total restrooms. One (1) is designated as a shared / common resident restroom, One (1) is designated as a private resident restroom. Resident restrooms were observed to be equipped with a slip resistant surface / mat. Grab bars were observed in the restrooms. The restrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. The hot water temperature was measured in all resident restrooms and ranged between 110.3-111.6 degrees Fahrenheit, all within the required range. LPA observed storage space closets in the hallway containing extra clean linens and towels for resident use. GARAGE: LPA observed the garage to be inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed the garage to contain the facility’s emergency food supplies, the facility’s washer and dryer, and locked storage for laundry chemicals. Additionally, the garage was observed to be utilized as the Administrator’s office. OUTDOOR SPACE: The facility has two (2) emergency exit gates located on either side of the facility; LPA observed clear passageways for emergency exit use. The facility has adequate shaded seating outdoors for resident use. LPA observed a secured storage shed that contained miscellaneous care supplies. Report Continued on LIC 809-C PAGE 2... (PAGE 3) Report Continued from LIC 809-C... RECORDS: Resident Records Four (4) Resident files were reviewed for, but not limited to, the following: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, Pre- admission appraisal, LIC627(c) Consent for Treatment form, Home Health records, Hospice records, PRN authorization letters, and current needs and services plan. All records were in order. Personnel Records Personnel files including the Administrator’s file were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All records were in order. INFECTION CONTROL/ EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit the LPA reviewed the facility’s infection control practices and the facilities emergency disaster plan. Both documents were observed to be complete and updated annually as required. The facilities policies and procedures, as they pertain to infection control and emergency planning meet the regulatory standard. The last emergency disaster drill took place on 05/18/2026 and are conducted quarterly. The facility is equipped with fire sprinklers throughout the space. The emergency disaster plan was updated on 04/02/2026 and the infection control was updated on 08/03/2026. MEDICATIONS: Medication review began at approximately 2:21 p.m. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a filing cabinet in the dining room adjacent to the kitchen. Medications for two (2) residents were reviewed. Medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. All medications including PRNs were properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record, stored, locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Medications reviewed were found to be self-administered as prescribed. No errors observed during review. LPA observed the first aid supplies to be complete, including sterile first aid dressings, bandages, tweezer, a thermometer and a current version of a first aid manual. DOCUMENTS: Documents obtained during the visit include: LIC 500 facility roster, LIC 9020A Resident roster, copy of the Limited Liability insurance, and Emergency Disaster plan, LIC610D. At the time if the visit the LPA reviewed the facilities contact information on file including phone numbers, email and annual fees. Administrator confirmed that all information is accurate. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2026
Jul 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a continuation of the required annual visit at 10:59 AM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the facility Administrator Edwin Paul Oyasan. The Administrator arrived to the facility at 11:10 AM. Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. During today’s visit LPA conducted a brief physical plant tour, conducted staff interviews, conducted a record/medication review, reviewed the facility’s emergency disaster plan/infection control plan, and obtained copies of the facility’s LIC 500, resident roster, and current liability insurance. The following was observed: PHYSICAL PLANT TOUR: During the physical plant tour LPA observed the under-sink storage of the hallway bathroom to be unlocked. LPA observed this storage to contain cleaning chemicals which were unsecured and accessible to clients in care. LPA informed the Administrator who locked the storage during the inspection. The facility’s fire alarms and fire door were tested at 02:21 PM and functioned properly at the time of the inspection. RECORD REVIEW: Record review began at 11:16 AM. Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, consent forms, and personal rights. Three (3) staff files were reviewed. All staff files contained all required documents and trainings. Four (4) resident files were reviewed. Resident #1 (R1), resident #2 (R2)’s files were observed to be missing signed copies of the personal rights of residents. LPA informed the Administrator of the missing documents. The Administrator agreed to obtain signed copies of the missing documents. Continued on LIC 809C. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medication review began at 12:45 PM. Medications for two (2) of four (4) residents were observed. All medications were documented appropriately on their respective centrally stored medication and destruction record sheets. No deficiencies were observed during medication review. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly; the facility’s last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 05/02/2025. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date and is adequate. Both the infection control plan and the emergency disaster plan are reviewed/updated annually by the facility’s Administrator. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed one (1) staff member. The staff member interviewed was knowledgeable on their roles and responsibilities, the resident’s rights, the forms of abuse, and the appropriate reporting procedures for suspected abuse. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 18, 2025
87309 Storage Space and Access (a) ... the licensee shall ensure that disinfectants, cleaning solutions, ... are in locked storage and are not left unattended if outside the locked storage. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as cleaning solutions were unsecured in an under-sink cabinet which poses an immediate health and safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator secured the chemicals at the time of the visit. POC cleared.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87468(b)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 1, 2025
87468 Personal Rights (b)...a resident...shall be...given a copy... (1) The personal rights of residents... (A) ...the signed copy shall be included in the resident's record. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as two residents did not have signed copies of the personal rights of residents included in their files which poses a potential personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to obtained signed copies of the personal rights of residents for the identified residents no later than POC due date.
Jul 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 02:16 PM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the facility Administrator Edwin Paul Oyasan. The Administrator arrived to the facility at 02:23 PM. Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. Beginning at 02:25 PM the LPA, along with facility Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen area to be clean. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. LPA observed a secured under-sink cabinet to contain knives and other sharp objects. Additionally, this locked cabinet was observed to contain cleaning supplies. LPA informed the Administrator that toxins may not be stored in the same storage as kitchen equipment or utensils. Administrator agreed to remove the chemicals and store the items in an alternate locked storage. LPA observed a fire extinguisher mounted on the wall to be serviced on 06/03/2025. The kitchen contained a locked cabinet that contained resident medications. Continued on LIC 809C. COMMON AREAS: This includes the living room, hallway, and dining area. LPA observed the living room to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. The living room contains a television and activities for resident use. The dining area was observed to be equipped with adequate seating for resident use. The hallway contained storage closets which contained extra linens for resident use and additional care supplies. All furniture throughout the facility was observed to be clean and in good repair. The facility’s combination fire and carbon monoxide alarms were tested at 02:52 PM and were functional at the time of the visit. During the fire alarm test LPA observed the facility’s hallway fire door to fail to close. LPA informed the Administrator that this is a zero tolerance violation of the facility’s fire clearance. LPA informed the Administrator that an immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500 is being assessed on today’s date (07/01/2025). The Administrator agreed to call a repairman to make appropriate repairs to the fire door. All exits in the facility were observed to contain functioning auditory alarms. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms in the facility; one (1) is a dual occupancy resident room and three (3) are single occupancy resident rooms. LPA and the facility Administrator toured all four (4) bedrooms. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. Bedrooms #3 & 4 contained a direct exit to the outdoors of the facility. BATHROOMS: There are two (2) bathrooms at the facility. One (1) is designated as a shared/common resident bathroom and one (1) is a private resident bathroom. All resident bathrooms were observed to be clean and were equipped with nonskid surfaces. Both bathrooms contained locked under sink storage cabinets that contained resident grooming supplies. Grab bars were observed in all resident showers and near all resident toilets all were properly secured. The water temperature was measured to be between 108.0 and 110.7 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the range required by regulation. OUTDOOR SPACE: The facility has two (2) emergency exit gates located on either side of the facility; LPA observed clear passageways for emergency exit use. The facility has adequate shaded seating outdoors for resident use. LPA observed a secured storage shed that contained miscellaneous care supplies. Continued on LIC 809C. GARAGE: LPA observed the garage to be inaccessible to clients in care. LPA observed the garage to contain the facility’s emergency food supplies, the facility’s washer and dryer, and locked storage for laundry chemicals. Additionally, the garage was observed to be utilized as the Administrator’s office. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed two (2) residents. Both residents interviewed stated that the staff treat them well and are attentive to their needs. No residents interviewed had concerns with the facility. Due to time constraints an LPA will return at a later date to conduct staff interviews, conduct a record/medication review, review the facility’s emergency disaster plan/infection control plan, and to obtain copies of the facility’s LIC 500, resident roster, and current liability insurance. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies and civil penalty were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(24) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 2, 2025
87555 General Food Service Requirements (b) The following...shall apply: (24)... toxic substances shall not be stored...where kitchen...utensils are stored. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as knives and other sharp objects were stored alongside toxins and cleaning chemicals in a locked under-sink storage cabinet located in the kitchen which poses an immediate health risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed that licensee will relocate the chemicals to a seperate locked storage area no later than POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87202(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 2, 2025
87202 Fire Clearance (a) All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the facility's fire door failed to close during a test of the facility's smoke alarms which poses an immediate safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025
Plan of correction: The administrator agreed that licensee will ensure the fire door remains closed until appropriate repairs can be completed. Administrator agreed to submit proof of the fire door functioning properly to CCLD.
Oct 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide emergency personnel with resident's proper documentation. Staff accepted a resident into the facility requiring a higher level of care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived unannounced for a subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. The LPA met with Administrator Paul Oyasan and explained the reason for the visit. On 07/26/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elsie Campos arrived unannounced for an initial complaint visit to investigate the above allegations at 3:20 p.m. The LPA met with Administrator Paul Oyasan and explained the reason for the visit. During today’s visit, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 3:25 p.m., interviewed resident at 3:38 p.m., interviewed administrator at 4:03 p.m., and collected pertinent documents at 4:10 p.m. Continues on LIC 9099C... Substantiated Pg. 2 Staff did not provide emergency personnel with resident's proper documentation. On the allegation that staff did not provide emergency personnel with resident’s proper documentation, it is the concern of the reporting party (RP) that the staff at the facility had no information regarding the resident (R1) when EMT personnel arrived to provide care for the resident and were unable to get any information regarding the resident’ medical history or contact information for R1. On 07/26/2023 LPA Campos interviewed the administrator, and the administrator stated that when EMT arrived to provide care to R1 and asked for R1’s personal information, the administrator gave the EMT personnel a copy of the Physician’s Report. Furthermore, the Administrator stated that on a previous EMT visit, the Administrator gave by mistake the original R1’s personal information, so the administrator did not have a copy. The Administrator stated that they gave the EMT, R1’s Conservator’ card and telephone number. On 10/11/2024, LPA Urena interviewed the Administrator, and the administrator stated that they did not recall why R1 was taken to the hospital, and that the protocol when EMT’s arrive to provide care, staff are to give them the residents’ personal contact information (LIC 601), the resident’s physician’s report, and centrally stored medication list, however these documents were not provided to the EMT personnel on 07/16/2023. The physician’s report obtained by LPA Urena was incomplete as it stated to see ‘attachment’ for the diagnosis, however, the attachment was not included/attached to the physician’s report. Staff interviewed stated that they could not exactly remember if the requested documents were available at the time R1 was taken to the hospital. LPA Urena was unable to interview the reporting party, and R1’s Conservator. Based on the information obtained through interviews, the staff did not provide the EMT personnel with the R1’s medical history, and medication information. Therefore, the allegation that staff did not provide emergency personnel with resident’s medical and history documentation, is deemed Substantiated at this time. Continues on LIC 9099C... Pg. 3 Staff accepted a resident into the facility requiring a higher level of care. On the allegation that staff accepted a resident into the facility requiring a higher level of care, it is the concern of the reporting party (RP) that (R1) was extremely ill and was taken to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) on the day EMT transported R1 to the hospital. On 07/26/2023, LPA Campos interviewed the Administrator, and the administrator stated that facility staff did everything for R1: Feeding, medications, eyedrops, vitamins, bathing, incontinent care. Staff stated that they would crush the medication and would put in in R1’s food. The LPA did not receive or found doctor’s orders for medication to be crushed and put in R1's food. R1 was not receiving hospice services while residing at the facility. The Administrator stated that the first time R1 was taken to the hospital, it was due to pneumonia. Administrator did not know why R1 was taken to the hospital the second time. On 10/11/2024, LPA Urena interviewed the Administrator and the administrator stated that R1 was receiving Home Health Services, PT (physical therapy) for mobility and transferring from chair to bed and vice versa. . Per Home Health communication with Administrator, R1 was seen by nurse with weekly visits from 12/28/22- 7/16/23 totake vitals, and was seen twice a week for physical therapy from 1/18/23- 2/22/23. On 10/11/2024, LPA Urena reviewed R1’s physician’s report dated 12/26/2022, and discharge papers from Health Care Center. Diagnosis Intestinal fibrosis, dysphasia, emphysema. R1 was to be admitted to facility with 24-hour caregiver services. Per staff interviews R1 was not receiving 24-hr, or one-to-one care. Furthermore, staff stated that home health was coming to check vitals and check sugar levels of R1. Staff does not recall if R1 was receiving PT for transferring from chair to bed and bed to chair. Based on the information obtained through record review, R1 required 24-hour care, and one person assist at all times. Therefore, the allegation that staff accepted a resident into the facility requiring a higher level of care, is deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations (CCR), the following deficiencies are cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Citations were issued. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report and Appeal Rights were issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230717142820
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87458(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 1, 2024
87458(a) Medical Assessment (a) Prior to a person's acceptance as a resident, the licensee shall obtain and keep on file, documentation of a full medical assessment, signed by a physician. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as one (1) out of the five (5) resident records reviewed did not have a complete Physicians' Report (LIC 602), which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2024
Plan of correction: The Administrator has agreed to do the following: To keep full packet of Emergency Documents in case of emergencies and to hand to EMT at request, review regulation cited and send a statement of understanding to LPA via email by 11/01/2024 at COB. Administrator provided proof of correction at time of the visit.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.72(1) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 1, 2024
1569.72 Residents requiring skilled nursing or intermediate care; bedridden residents (1) The resident requires 24-hour, skilled nursing or intermediate care. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as R1 required 24 hour care, and administration of medication.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2024
Plan of correction: The Administrator has agreed to do the following: Review regulation cited and send a statement of understanding to LPA via email by 11/01/2024 at COB.
Oct 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is utilizing resident's room as storage. Staff does not ensure resident is provided a bed. Staff creates a barrier in common room for resident in care. Staff does not ensure facility is kept clean.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived unannounced for a subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. The LPA initially met with facility staff; Administrator Edwin Paul Oyasan arrived shortly thereafter. The LPA met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. On 07/26/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elsie Campos arrived unannounced for an initial complaint visit to investigate the above allegations at 3:20 p.m. The LPA met with Administrator Paul Oyasan and explained the reason for the visit. During today’s visit, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 3:25 p.m., interviewed resident at 3:38 p.m., interviewed administrator at 4:03 p.m., and collected pertinent documents at 4:10 p.m. Continues on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated Pg 2. Staff is utilizing resident's room as storage. On the allegation that staff is using the residents’ room as storage; it is the concern of the reporting party (RP) that they observed the resident’s (R1) bedroom crowded with various items and used as a storage area. On 07/26/2023, LPA Campos interviewed the Administrator, and residents. LPA Campos conducted a tour of the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards. The LPA observed the residents’ rooms to be free of clutter. The residents’ interviews revealed that they were happy with their rooms, and that their rooms were not used for storage. On 10/15/2024, LPA Urena interviewed residents, and residents’ representatives, and the interviews revealed that they were very happy with the way facility staff kept their rooms clean. On 10/11/2024, LPA Urena conducted a tour of the physical plant at approximately 11:01 a.m. and found the facility to be free of clutter and in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. LPA Urena was unable to interview the reporting party. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, based on the interviews, and observation, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur. Therefore, the allegation that staff is utilizing resident's room as storage, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff does not ensure resident is provided a bed. On the allegation that staff does not ensure resident is provided a bed, it is the concern of the reporting party (RP) that they witnessed a resident sleeping in the living room on two recliners pushed together. 07/26/2023, LPA Campos conducted a physical plant tour, and observed beds in each bedroom for residents living at the facility. On 10/15/2024, LPA Urena conducted a physical plant tour, and observed that residents have a room and a bed designated for their use. Bedrooms one (1), two (2) and three (3) are private rooms; and bedroom four (4) is a shared room. Each bedroom was observed to have a bed(s) and required furniture. On 10/15/2024, LPA Urena interviewed staff, and they stated that sometimes residents do fall asleep on the recliners by the window in the living room area, but that all residents have a bed in their bedroom, and staff will encourage the residents to sleep on their beds. Residents’ representatives’ interviews revealed that they know that sometimes the residents may fall asleep on their recliners, however, they do have a bed in their room. LPA Urena was unable to interview the reporting party. Based on the information gathered through observation and interviews, the allegation that Staff do not ensure resident is provided a bed, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Continues on LIC 9099C... Pg3. Staff creates a barrier in common room for resident in care. On the allegation that staff creates a barrier in common room for residents in care; the reporting party (RP) reported that they observed a barrier between the living room area and the common area, creating a barrier for the resident(s) while they are in the living room area and preventing them from going to other areas of the facility. On 07/26/2023, LPA Campos conducted a physical plant tour of the common areas and did not observed barriers of any type. Residents’ interviews revealed that they had not experienced any obstructions within the facility preventing them from moving from the common area to their rooms. LPA Urena interviewed residents’ representatives, and the representatives stated that they had not witnessed barriers preventing residents from moving freely throughout the facility. The Administrator denied staff creating barriers to prevent residents from leaving the common room. The staff denied creating barriers to keep residents secluded in the living room area. LPA Urena was unable to interview the reporting party. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, based on the interviews, and observation, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur. Therefore, the allegation that staff creates a barrier in common room for residents in care, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff does not ensure facility is kept clean. On the allegation that staff does not ensure facility is kept clean; it is the concern of the reporting party (RP) that the facility was observed to be dirty. On 07/26/2023, LPA Campos interviewed the Administrator, and residents. LPA Campos conducted a tour of the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards. The LPA observed the facility to be clean and in order. The residents’ interviews revealed that they were happy with the cleanliness of facility and their room. On 10/15/2024, LPA Urena interviewed residents, and residents’ representatives, and the interviews revealed that they were very happy with the way the facility staff keep their rooms clean. On 10/11/2024, LPA Urena conducted a tour of the physical plant at approximately 11:01 a.m. and found the facility to be clean and in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. LPA Urena was unable to interview the reporting party. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, based on the interviews, and observation, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur. Therefore, the allegation that staff does not ensure facility is kept clean, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No citations were issued. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230726084730
Aug 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 10:54AM. LPA initially met with facility staff; Administrator Edwin Paul Oyasan arrived shortly after the visit began. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 11:03AM, the LPA, along with Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Hardwired combination smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 01:09PM and were functional at the time of the visit. Fire extinguisher was observed to be fully charged and last serviced on 04/25/2024. BEDROOMS: There are 4 (four) total bedrooms; 3 (three) are for private resident use and 1 (one) is designated for shared use. The LPA observed the resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. 2 (two) full bedrails were observed on Resident #1 (R1)'s bed and 1 (one) full bedrail was observed on Resident #2 (R2)'s bed. Neither R1 nor R2 are on hospice. RESTROOMS: The LPA observed 2 (two) restrooms in the facility; 1 (one) is for shared use and 1 (one) is designated for private resident use. Resident restrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. Water temperature was measured in both resident restrooms and measured within the required range. COMMON SPACES: In the common areas, walls and flooring were checked for cleanliness and good condition. At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The LPA observed the required postings in the common area. A fireplace was observed in the living room to be adequately screened and inaccessible to residents in care. Auditory exit alarms were functional at the time of the visit. Report Continued on LIC 809-C OUTDOOR SPACE: The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture for resident use. All exits and passageways were observed to be free of hazards. No bodies of water were observed on the premises. KITCHEN: Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Knives and cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and properly stored at the time of the visit. A locked garage was observed adjacent to the kitchen and contained extra food, emergency food & water supply, storage, and laundry area. RECORD REVIEW: Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, and personal rights. 5 (five) resident records were reviewed. 2 (two) residents with a diagnosis of dementia did not have current annual medical assessments. The medical assessment for Resident #3 (R3) was dated 04/28/2023 and the medical assessment for Resident #4 (R4) was dated 08/15/2023. 5 (five) staff files reviewed were complete and contained all required documents. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility’s infection control plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. LPA also reviewed the facility's emergency disaster plan, which was observed to be complete and updated annually, as required. Emergency drills are conducted quarterly. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medications for 2 (two) residents were observed. Both 2 (two) of 2 (two) residents' medications were observed to be maintained and administered in compliance with regulation. LPA provided Administrator with the Department's RCFE Medication Guide via email. INTERVIEWS: Throughout the visit, LPA interviewed 2 (two) residents and 2 (two) staff. No concerns were identified. During today's visit, LPA obtained a copy of the facility's liability insurance. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 809-D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or CA Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Administrator. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Who holds the licence
Oyasan, Edwin, licensed since 2019, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Melos Care Home II · Thousand Oaks
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Ventura County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Applegate @ Drummond
Thousand Oaks · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$5,400 a month to start · Covelight estimate
2592 Ciro
Thousand Oaks · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$5,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Cinnamon Garden Home
Thousand Oaks · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$5,700 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Compassionate Care Residence - Flores
Thousand Oaks · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$5,400 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Erten Home Care
Thousand Oaks · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$5,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Select Senior Living II
Thousand Oaks · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$5,350 a month to start · Covelight estimate