Small home · Licensed for 6 · El Centro
Majestic Villa Assisted Living
1910 Woodside Dr, El Centro, CA 92243Licensed since 2018
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 5 residents
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
- Bedridden
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 6 OF WHICH 5 NON-AMBULATORY AND 1 BEDRIDDEN; APPROVED FOR HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Majestic Villa Assisted Living: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$4,000a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,000likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,000this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$4,600
- $4,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,000–$8,150
- $6,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
1910 Woodside Dr, El Centro, CA 92243Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- El Centro Regional Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.5 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #374604082 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 2 of 8 documents
20241 state visit · 1 document
Oct 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)s Nacole Patterson and Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPAs were welcomed by and discussed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Stephanie Escobedo. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of 5 non-ambulatory residents and 1 bedridden. During today’s inspection there were 5 residents in care. LPAs and Caregiver Stephanie Escobedo toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. The facility has a pool on site that was locked and inaccessible to residents. Per Caregiver Stephanie Escobedo, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPAs interviewed staff and residents, and reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPAs contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Stephanie Escobedo and House Manager Angelica Quintero to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by and discussed the purpose of the visit to caregivers Stephanie Escobedo and Angelica Quintero. Licensee Quetzalli Kahnis came to the facility during the visit. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) residents, five (5) of whom may be non-ambulatory and one (1) bedridden. During today’s inspection there were 6 residents in care. LPA and caregivers toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. Facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals/poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. The facility has a pool, which was fenced in and locked, inaccessible to residents. Per licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and clients, and reviewed staff and client records/files. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Angelica Quintero, Caregiver, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 6 documents
20231 state visit · 2 documents
Jan 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: - Staff did not allow resident visitation. - Staff did not provide authorized representative resident records.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Angelica Quintero, caregiver. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with caregiver Quintero and via telephone with Kevin Kahnis and Quetzalli Kahnis, Administrator's. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and outside sources, and records reviewed of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On April 1, 2022, it was alleged that the facility did not allow resident visitation. It was also alleged that staff did not provide authorized representative resident records. On April1, 2022, it was alleged that facility staff did not allow Resident #1 (R1) visitation. Interviews with staff determined a visitor was granted entry to visit R1 but was later asked by staff to leave the facility due to potential safety concerns. Staff statements indicated the visitor in question had misrepresented themselves as a “nurse”. Unsubstantiated R1 was not able to identify the visitor by name. Review of facility visitation log showed the individual in question signed in as a private visitor and was not a medical professional. Additional source documents determined the facility had subsequent negative contact with this individual. Staff concerns related to disruptive visitation were also reported to the Department during this time period. There was insufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff did not allow R1 visitation. It was also alleged that staff did not provide records to a resident’s authorized representative. Specifically, it was alleged that staff refused to provide a facility notebook that contained internal care annotations for Resident #2 (R2). There were inconsistent statements from outside sources regarding who had power of attorney for R2 and could access this information. However, records review determined the names of specific individuals who were designed as the resident’s authorized representatives on file. Neither of these individuals had made the request to staff to have access to the internal facility notebook concerning R2. No additional documentation was provided during the investigation. There was insufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff did not provide records to R2’s authorized representative. Based on evidence obtained from interviews and records review, there was insufficient evidence to support either allegation. The above allegations were therefore deemed to be unsubstantiated since the preponderance of evidence standard was not met. An exit interview was conducted with caregiver Quintero and Administrator's Kahnis' and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) was provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220401125415
Jan 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportCollateralReport on file
Type of visit: Collateral
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced collateral visit to the facility to obtain records regarding another complaint investigation. LPA Lopez identified herself and stated the purpose of the visit with Angelica Quintero, caregiver, and Quetzalli Kahnis, Administrator, via telephone. During the visit, LPA Lopez requested and obtained relevant documents. No deficiencies were observed during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) was provided to Angelica Quintero, caregiver, at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2023
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 22, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tammer de los Santos visited the facility to conduct an annual required licensing inspection. LPA was granted entry into the facility by Samantha Granados, Caregiver to whom LPA disclosed the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility and verified compliance with infection control practices. LPA observed one central entry point for universal entry screening; temperature check initiated at entry for staff, residents, and visitors; a sign-in policy enacted for visitors; signs in the facility to promote hand hygiene, cough / sneeze etiquette, symptom, and transmission awareness; face coverings worn by staff; hand sanitizer readily available; available visitation area; emergency agencies’ contact information visible to staff; and an ample supply of cleaning products and personal protective equipment. LPA gave a copy of Provider Information Notice PIN 22-13-ASC. The licensee was granted a waiver under the Authority of Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-11-22 issued on June 17, 2022, and the licensee agreed to submit the Infection Control Plan by January 21, 2023. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted with Samantha Granados, Caregiver and copies of this report and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. Ms. Granados’ signature on this form acknowledges receipt of the rights and a copy of the report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2022
Apr 6, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit to ensure ongoing compliance with laws and regulations and ensure the health and safety of residents in care. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by a Aurora Lopez, Caretaker. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the basic elements of the visit with caretaker Lopez. Facility Manager Siklalic Garcia later arrived and joined the visit. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility, observed residents in care, and provided consultation regarding Title 22 requirements. LPA discussed the following regulations: CCR – 87211 Reporting Requirements; CCR – 87633 Hospice Care of Terminally Ill Residents; CCR – 87632 Hospice Care Waiver. The Facility Manager was debriefed on the regulations and there is an understanding of the regulations. Based on today’s inspection, there were no deficiencies cited at this time in the areas evaluated. An exit interview was conducted with Facility Manager Siklalic Garcia and caretaker Kate Delgadillo. A copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided via email to Facility Manager Garcia and Licensee Quetzalli Kahnis via email. An electronic receipt of confirmation was requested to be sent upon receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2022
20211 state visit · 2 documents
Nov 15, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual required licensing inspection. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Aurora Lopez, Caregiver. LPA met with Facility Manager Siklatic Garcia, Facility Manager and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. A tour of the facility was conducted inside and out. LPA, accompanied by Facility Manager conducted a general overall inspection, with specific focus on infection control protocols. During today's inspection LPA observations include the following: Symptom screening procedures for staff, residents and visitors; posted signs regarding visitor policy, promoting hand washing, cough and sneeze etiquette and other infection control procedures; testing plan and procedures; plans for containing infections, PPE supplies procedures and training; and disinfection procedures. Based on today’s inspection, no deficiencies were observed. An exit interview was conducted with Facility Manager. A copy of this report, along with the Licensee Rights (01/2016) was emailed to Facility Manager Garcia and Licensee at the conclusion of the visit. LPA requested Facility Manager or for the Licensee Quetzalli Kahnis to send LPA an electronic message reply confirming receipt of these documents. A current Personnel Report LIC 500, Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308 and an Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E was given to LPA during the visit. Form are also available at www.ccld.ca.gov.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2021
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Nov 15, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced Case Management visit at the facility, to complete a health and safety check for clients in care. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Aurora Lopez, Caregiver. LPA met with Siklatic Garcia, Facility Manager and disclosed the purpose of the visit. The facility self-reported an incident regarding Resident 1 (R1) (See LIC 811 Confidential Names List) to Community Care Licensing on November 5, 2021. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility, spoke with staff, residents and Licensee, and reviewed and obtained resident records maintained by the facility. No immediate health or safety concerns were observed. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted with Facility Manager Garcia, and a copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16), was provided to the Quezalli Khanis Licensee and Facility Manager Garcia via electronic mail. An electronic read receipt confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2021
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the January 12, 2023 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Precious Truth LLC, licensed since 2018.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2018, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 1
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2018, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 1 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Majestic Villa Assisted Living
Is Majestic Villa Assisted Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Majestic Villa Assisted Living licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Majestic Villa Assisted Living been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Majestic Villa Assisted Living still open?
The state does not list this license as closed, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
What does Majestic Villa Assisted Living cost?
$4,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 197 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Diego County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,125 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 197 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Majestic Villa Assisted Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Precious Truth LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
El Centro Regional Medical Center is 0.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Majestic Villa Assisted Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Majestic Villa Assisted Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “MAJESTIC VILLA ASSISTED LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #374604082. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Precious Truth LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 21, 2024, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$6,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,750 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,550–$7,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,850On the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,650–$7,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County