This licence is listed as closed. The state lists it as “Closed, Agency Initiated”, September 13, 2026.

Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Loomis Home Care

Small home·6 while this license was open·Loomis, California

Closed in state recordLicence #315002096
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · DementiaState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Home size6 while this license was openSmall care home · the state license record
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedApril 29, 2026 · not a current opening

Loomis Home Care in Loomis held a license for a small care home — a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE). The license covered 6 residents, first issued in 2008. The state lists this licence as “Closed, Agency Initiated.”

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Loomis Home Care

Is Loomis Home Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Closed, Agency Initiated,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Loomis Home Care licensed for?

6 residents while this license was open — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Loomis Home Care been cited?

1 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 17 state visits over the same years.

Is Loomis Home Care still open?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

What does Loomis Home Care cost?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size across Placer County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,900 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Loomis Home Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license was held by Mile, Petre, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Can Loomis Home Care keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license.

Loomis Home Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “LOOMIS HOME CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #315002096. The state lists this license as “Closed, Agency Initiated,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • This license covered 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • This license was held by Mile, Petre, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 17 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 17 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 4, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, AGES 60 AND ABOVE. APPROVED FOR DEMENTIA CARE.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,450a month to start

Likely $3,650–$5,500

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,450a month

Likely $3,650–$5,700

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,450likely $3,650–$5,500

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$5,700
$4,450
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$8,800
$6,450
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$6,400.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7964 Rasmussen Rd., Loomis, CA 95650Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 14 documents for this home, and its records count 17 visits since 2008. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 4, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
17
Most recent visit
May 4, 2026
Occupied · April 29, 2026 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated March 1, 2022 to April 29, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations3typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations4typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2008.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202667220252212024110202311020222202021110

The last 36 months — 10 of 14 documents

20266 state visits · 7 documents
May 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

On Monday May 4, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived at the facility. LPA Parks met with Licensee Petre. This visit is in regard to the Temporary Suspension Order and Immediate Exclusion which will be in effect at 5:00pm today. LPA Parks conducted a tour of the facility to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. As of 2:30 p.m., R1-R5 were successfully relocated, and no residents remained in care. The Regional Office staff ensured that the transition process was carried out in accordance with Title 22 regulations. Collaboration with the resident families and admitting facilities supported a smooth relocation for the residents, safeguarding their health, safety, and personal rights throughout the process. The Department emphasized that the Temporary Suspension Order and Immediate Exclusion remain in effect and that the licensee retains the right to appeal under the Notice of Defense procedures. see 809D for deficiencies cited during todays visit. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 4, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 87465(e) · Plan of correction due date: May 5, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (e) For every prescription and nonprescription PRN medication for which the licensee provides assistance there shall be a signed, dated written order from a physician, on a prescription blank, maintained in the residents file . . . This requirement was not met as evidenced by R1-R6 not having signed orders for all medications. This poses a direct threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 4, 2026

Plan of correction: Due to the TSO being in effect as of 5:00pm on May 4, 2026, no plan of corrections required

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(h)(6) · Plan of correction due date: May 5, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (6) The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescription medications for each resident is maintained . . . This requirement was not met as evidenced by no centrally stored records for R1-R6. This poses a direct threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 4, 2026

Plan of correction: Due to the TSO being in effect as of 5:00pm on May 4, 2026, no plan of corrections required

May 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Sunday May 3, 2026 to conduct a case management visit regarding the Temporary Suspension Order which was served on May 1, 2026 and will be in effect on Monday May 4, 2026 at 5:00 pm. LPAs conducted a health and safety tour of the facility. At this time, there are 5 remaining residents. No deficiencies cited. A copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 3, 2026
May 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Melissa Parks and Bethany Mirlohi arrived on Saturday May 2, 2026 to conduct a case management visit regarding the Temporary Suspension Order which was served on May 1, 2026 and will be in effect on Monday May 4, 2026 at 5:00 pm. LPAs conducted a health and safety tour of the facility. At this time, there are 5 remaining residents. No deficiencies cited. A copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2026
May 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

On Friday May 1, 2026, Licensing Program Managers (LPMs) Laura Munoz and Troy Ordonez, and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived at the facility unannounced. Present at the facility was Licensee Petre Mile and one staff member. The purpose of this visit was to issue the Temporary Suspension Order and immediate exclusion for S1 which will be in effect on Monday May 4, 2026 at 5:00pm. LPM Ordonez reviewed the temporary suspension order and LPM Munoz reviewed the immediate exclusion with Licensee Petre Mile. Copies of the accusation were provided to all residents. The Licensee was reminded that he must cooperate with the Department, local placement, and advocacy agencies in the onsite evaluation of the residents and their transfer to alternative placement sites. As a result of today’s visit, no deficiencies are being issued. Exit interview. Copy of report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2026
Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Financial Abuse

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Wednesday April 29, 2026, to deliver findings for a complaint received on 4/24/2026. LPA met with Licensee Petre and explained the purpose of the visit. The result of the investigation is as follows: LPA learned that Petre obtained R1’s credit card in October of 2025. The licensee charged R1’s credit card approximately 62 times in October 2025; 9 times in November 2025; 22 times in December 2025 and 5 times between January and March 2026 for a total of $10,189.22. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegation to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Appeal rights were given. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the facility. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260424095140

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(8) · Plan of correction due date: May 1, 2026

87468.2 Additional Personal Rights . . . (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents . . . shall have all of the following personal rights: (8) To be free from neglect, financial exploitation . . . This requirement was not met as evidenced by the Licensee using R1's credit card in unauthorized charges. This poses a direct threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to repay R1 for the total amount charged on the credit card of $10,189.22. Licensee to send LPA proof of payment.

Apr 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Wednesday April 29, 2026 to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Licensee Petre and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA reviewed R1-R5's facility files. Per regulation 87506(d), LPA is removing the following documents: R1: LIC602 R2: LIC602 R3: emergency contact information, admission agreement, LIC601, LIC602 R4: emergency contact information, Admission agreement, LIC601, LIC602, R5: LIC602, admission agreement, emergency contact information, LIC601 LPA will return the above files by end of day tomorrow, Thursday April 29, 2026. LPA did not observe admission agreements for R1 and R2. LPA did not observe preadmission appraisals for R1, R2, and R4.. LPA did not observe personal rights (LIC613-C) for R1-R5. Additionally, LPA did not observe reappraisals for R5 and R6. LPA and Petre toured the facility. LPA did not observe any health, safety or personal rights violations. see 809-D for deficiencies cited during todays visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of appeal right and this report was provided to the Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(c) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2026

87507 Admission Agreements (c) Admission agreements shall be signed and dated, acknowledging the contents of the document, by the resident or the resident’s representative, . . .no later than seven days following admission. This requirement was not met as evidenced by R1 and R2 not having signed admission agreements in their resident records. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to: have admission agreements signed for R1 and R2 by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87467(c) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2026

87457 Pre-Admission Appraisal (c) Prior to admission a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for admission shall be completed and shall include an appraisal of their individual service needs . .this requirement was not met as evidenced by no completed preadmission appraisals for R1-R5. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to have preadmission appraisals for R1, R2 and R4 by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468(b)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2026

87468 Personal Rights (b) At the time the admission agreement is signed . . .(1) The personal rights of residents (A) The licensee shall have each resident and the resident's representative sign a copy of these rights, and the signed copy shall be included in the resident's record. This requirement was not met as evidenced by no signed LIC613-C in R1-R6 facility files. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to have LIC613C signed for R1-R6 and kept in resident records by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87463(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2026

87463 Reappraisals (a) The pre-admission appraisal, as specified in Section 87457, Pre-Admission Appraisal, shall be updated in writing as frequently as necessary or once every 12 months, whichever occurs first . . . This requirement was not met as evidenced by R5 and R6 not having reappraisals completed within the last 12 months. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to complete LIC625 for R5 and R6 by POC due date.

Feb 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff will not allow resident to be readmitted to the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday February 12, 2026, to deliver findings for a complaint received on 12/1/2025. LPA met with Administrator Peter and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed the Administrator and POA for R1. Per both parties, R1 was sent to the hospital due to behaviors and a suspected UTI. Once R1 was medically cleared to return to the facility, the Administrator refused to let R1 return. Per R1’s POA, the hospital agreed to let R1 stay admitted until new placement was secured. The Administrator did not follow eviction procedures per Title 22. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegation to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Appeal rights were given. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the facility. Substantiated Based on information obtained during the investigation, LPA finds the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- a finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251201141816

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 26, 2026

87224 Eviction Procedures (a) The licensee may evict a resident for . . .Thirty (30) days written notice to the resident is required (4) If, after admission, it is determined that the resident has a need not previously identified . . . This requirement was not met as evidenced by R1 not being allowed to return to the facility, from the hospital, due to behaviors. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator submitted a statement of understanding regarding eviction procedures. Citation was cleared during visit.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity/respect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Wednesday September 17, 2025 to conduct a visit regarding a complaint received on 9/16/2025. LPA met with Administrator Peter and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff regarding the allegation. LPA reviewed R1's facility file. LPA learned the following: R1 moved into the facility in May 2025. On September 14, 2025, R1 requested for the Administrator to give them a pill to die. The Administrator explained that he will reach out to R1's primary physician for psychiatry referral the following day (Monday). Then R1 stated 'why do you hate me'. The Administrator explained that he does not hate them, but now it is time for their routine toileting.R1 declined. The Administrator then attempted to give R1 a glass of water and take their dinner plate, at which time, R1 scratched the Administrator's arm. The Administrator became upset and used derogatory language towards R1. R1 then asked for the phone from the staff. R1 then called their family and then 911. While waiting for 911, the Administrator called an advise line for R1's healthcare, who then instructed for the Administrator to send R1 to the hospital for testing. Substantiated Once the police and paramedics arrived, R1 was taken to the hospital and later diagnosed with a UTI. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegation to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Appeal rights were given. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was left with the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250916084932

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 30, 2025

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities . . . (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff. . .This requirement was not met as evidenced by interview with the Administrator. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2025

Plan of correction: Facility agrees to do the following: The Administrator submitted a statement of understanding during the visit.

Aug 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 08/28/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived to the facility unannounced to conduct a Required 1- year annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Petre Mile, to conduct a tour and file review. LPA reviewed (2) resident files and (1) staff file. All files contained the correct documentation. During today's inspection, LPA and Administrator conducted a tour of the exterior and interior of facility to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured included but not limited to: residents bedrooms, bathroom, medication closet, kitchen, backyard and the common areas. LPA observed toxins, medication and sharps to be locked and secured. Fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. LPA observed complete first-aid kit. LPA completed the CARE tool and found the facility to be in compliance. Facility meets the perishable and nonperishable food requirements. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. No deficiencies are being cited during todays visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was emailed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Sep 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Graham Gunby and Kerry Hiratsuka arrived on Thursday September 12, 2024 to conduct the unannounced annual inspection. During today's annual inspection, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. LPA reviewed resident (3) and staff (1) files. All resident files contained the required paperwork. All staff files contained the required paperwork. LPAs discussed continuing training to maintain compliance. Facility is compliant with fire drills. LPAs and Administrator Petre toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The areas toured included common areas, resident bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, and backyard. Facility has all required postings. All water temperatures were within the required range. Facility has a fully stocked first aid kit. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was left with administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes in Placer County near this one, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Placer County