Small home · Loomis
Loomis Home Care
7964 Rasmussen Rd., Loomis, CA 95650Closed in state record
About this record
This page keeps the history of license #315002096. It does not describe current care or pricing at this address.
Browse homes in this areaAt a glance
- Care approvals recorded under this license
- Wheelchair · Dementia
- State licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Home size
- 6 while this license was open
- Small care home · the state license record
Care and support
These approvals belong to the closed license. They do not establish current care services at this address.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryRecorded under this license · up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careRecorded under this license
Not on file in this record: Hospice care and Bedridden.
State licensing record · October 26, 2026. A different license at this address has its own record.
Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, AGES 60 AND ABOVE. APPROVED FOR DEMENTIA CARE.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Previously reported costs
This license is listed as closed. A current stay cannot be priced under this license.
Published prices are not on file for this license. Browse nearby homes to compare their reported costs.
This license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Daily life
Descriptions collected for this closed license. They do not describe current services at this address.
Daily-life descriptions are not on file for this license. See nearby homes for current listings.
Where it is
7964 Rasmussen Rd., Loomis, CA 95650Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #315002096 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 10 of 14 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Substantiated”.
20266 state visits · 7 documents
May 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceDeficiency pages: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
On Monday May 4, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived at the facility. LPA Parks met with Licensee Petre. This visit is in regard to the Temporary Suspension Order and Immediate Exclusion which will be in effect at 5:00pm today. LPA Parks conducted a tour of the facility to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. As of 2:30 p.m., R1-R5 were successfully relocated, and no residents remained in care. The Regional Office staff ensured that the transition process was carried out in accordance with Title 22 regulations. Collaboration with the resident families and admitting facilities supported a smooth relocation for the residents, safeguarding their health, safety, and personal rights throughout the process. The Department emphasized that the Temporary Suspension Order and Immediate Exclusion remain in effect and that the licensee retains the right to appeal under the Notice of Defense procedures. see 809D for deficiencies cited during todays visit. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 4, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 87465(e) · Plan of correction due date: May 5, 2026
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (e) For every prescription and nonprescription PRN medication for which the licensee provides assistance there shall be a signed, dated written order from a physician, on a prescription blank, maintained in the residents file . . . This requirement was not met as evidenced by R1-R6 not having signed orders for all medications. This poses a direct threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 4, 2026
Plan of correction: Due to the TSO being in effect as of 5:00pm on May 4, 2026, no plan of corrections required
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(h)(6) · Plan of correction due date: May 5, 2026
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (6) The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescription medications for each resident is maintained . . . This requirement was not met as evidenced by no centrally stored records for R1-R6. This poses a direct threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 4, 2026
Plan of correction: Due to the TSO being in effect as of 5:00pm on May 4, 2026, no plan of corrections required
May 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Sunday May 3, 2026 to conduct a case management visit regarding the Temporary Suspension Order which was served on May 1, 2026 and will be in effect on Monday May 4, 2026 at 5:00 pm. LPAs conducted a health and safety tour of the facility. At this time, there are 5 remaining residents. No deficiencies cited. A copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 3, 2026
May 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Melissa Parks and Bethany Mirlohi arrived on Saturday May 2, 2026 to conduct a case management visit regarding the Temporary Suspension Order which was served on May 1, 2026 and will be in effect on Monday May 4, 2026 at 5:00 pm. LPAs conducted a health and safety tour of the facility. At this time, there are 5 remaining residents. No deficiencies cited. A copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2026
May 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
On Friday May 1, 2026, Licensing Program Managers (LPMs) Laura Munoz and Troy Ordonez, and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived at the facility unannounced. Present at the facility was Licensee Petre Mile and one staff member. The purpose of this visit was to issue the Temporary Suspension Order and immediate exclusion for S1 which will be in effect on Monday May 4, 2026 at 5:00pm. LPM Ordonez reviewed the temporary suspension order and LPM Munoz reviewed the immediate exclusion with Licensee Petre Mile. Copies of the accusation were provided to all residents. The Licensee was reminded that he must cooperate with the Department, local placement, and advocacy agencies in the onsite evaluation of the residents and their transfer to alternative placement sites. As a result of today’s visit, no deficiencies are being issued. Exit interview. Copy of report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2026
Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Financial Abuse
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Wednesday April 29, 2026, to deliver findings for a complaint received on 4/24/2026. LPA met with Licensee Petre and explained the purpose of the visit. The result of the investigation is as follows: LPA learned that Petre obtained R1’s credit card in October of 2025. The licensee charged R1’s credit card approximately 62 times in October 2025; 9 times in November 2025; 22 times in December 2025 and 5 times between January and March 2026 for a total of $10,189.22. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegation to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Appeal rights were given. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the facility. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260424095140
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(8) · Plan of correction due date: May 1, 2026
87468.2 Additional Personal Rights . . . (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents . . . shall have all of the following personal rights: (8) To be free from neglect, financial exploitation . . . This requirement was not met as evidenced by the Licensee using R1's credit card in unauthorized charges. This poses a direct threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to repay R1 for the total amount charged on the credit card of $10,189.22. Licensee to send LPA proof of payment.
Apr 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Wednesday April 29, 2026 to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Licensee Petre and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA reviewed R1-R5's facility files. Per regulation 87506(d), LPA is removing the following documents: R1: LIC602 R2: LIC602 R3: emergency contact information, admission agreement, LIC601, LIC602 R4: emergency contact information, Admission agreement, LIC601, LIC602, R5: LIC602, admission agreement, emergency contact information, LIC601 LPA will return the above files by end of day tomorrow, Thursday April 29, 2026. LPA did not observe admission agreements for R1 and R2. LPA did not observe preadmission appraisals for R1, R2, and R4.. LPA did not observe personal rights (LIC613-C) for R1-R5. Additionally, LPA did not observe reappraisals for R5 and R6. LPA and Petre toured the facility. LPA did not observe any health, safety or personal rights violations. see 809-D for deficiencies cited during todays visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of appeal right and this report was provided to the Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(c) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2026
87507 Admission Agreements (c) Admission agreements shall be signed and dated, acknowledging the contents of the document, by the resident or the resident’s representative, . . .no later than seven days following admission. This requirement was not met as evidenced by R1 and R2 not having signed admission agreements in their resident records. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to: have admission agreements signed for R1 and R2 by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87467(c) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2026
87457 Pre-Admission Appraisal (c) Prior to admission a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for admission shall be completed and shall include an appraisal of their individual service needs . .this requirement was not met as evidenced by no completed preadmission appraisals for R1-R5. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to have preadmission appraisals for R1, R2 and R4 by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468(b)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2026
87468 Personal Rights (b) At the time the admission agreement is signed . . .(1) The personal rights of residents (A) The licensee shall have each resident and the resident's representative sign a copy of these rights, and the signed copy shall be included in the resident's record. This requirement was not met as evidenced by no signed LIC613-C in R1-R6 facility files. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to have LIC613C signed for R1-R6 and kept in resident records by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87463(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2026
87463 Reappraisals (a) The pre-admission appraisal, as specified in Section 87457, Pre-Admission Appraisal, shall be updated in writing as frequently as necessary or once every 12 months, whichever occurs first . . . This requirement was not met as evidenced by R5 and R6 not having reappraisals completed within the last 12 months. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to complete LIC625 for R5 and R6 by POC due date.
Feb 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff will not allow resident to be readmitted to the facility
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday February 12, 2026, to deliver findings for a complaint received on 12/1/2025. LPA met with Administrator Peter and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed the Administrator and POA for R1. Per both parties, R1 was sent to the hospital due to behaviors and a suspected UTI. Once R1 was medically cleared to return to the facility, the Administrator refused to let R1 return. Per R1’s POA, the hospital agreed to let R1 stay admitted until new placement was secured. The Administrator did not follow eviction procedures per Title 22. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegation to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Appeal rights were given. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the facility. Substantiated Based on information obtained during the investigation, LPA finds the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- a finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251201141816
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 26, 2026
87224 Eviction Procedures (a) The licensee may evict a resident for . . .Thirty (30) days written notice to the resident is required (4) If, after admission, it is determined that the resident has a need not previously identified . . . This requirement was not met as evidenced by R1 not being allowed to return to the facility, from the hospital, due to behaviors. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator submitted a statement of understanding regarding eviction procedures. Citation was cleared during visit.
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity/respect
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Wednesday September 17, 2025 to conduct a visit regarding a complaint received on 9/16/2025. LPA met with Administrator Peter and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff regarding the allegation. LPA reviewed R1's facility file. LPA learned the following: R1 moved into the facility in May 2025. On September 14, 2025, R1 requested for the Administrator to give them a pill to die. The Administrator explained that he will reach out to R1's primary physician for psychiatry referral the following day (Monday). Then R1 stated 'why do you hate me'. The Administrator explained that he does not hate them, but now it is time for their routine toileting.R1 declined. The Administrator then attempted to give R1 a glass of water and take their dinner plate, at which time, R1 scratched the Administrator's arm. The Administrator became upset and used derogatory language towards R1. R1 then asked for the phone from the staff. R1 then called their family and then 911. While waiting for 911, the Administrator called an advise line for R1's healthcare, who then instructed for the Administrator to send R1 to the hospital for testing. Substantiated Once the police and paramedics arrived, R1 was taken to the hospital and later diagnosed with a UTI. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegation to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Appeal rights were given. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was left with the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250916084932
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 30, 2025
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities . . . (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff. . .This requirement was not met as evidenced by interview with the Administrator. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2025
Plan of correction: Facility agrees to do the following: The Administrator submitted a statement of understanding during the visit.
Aug 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 08/28/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived to the facility unannounced to conduct a Required 1- year annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Petre Mile, to conduct a tour and file review. LPA reviewed (2) resident files and (1) staff file. All files contained the correct documentation. During today's inspection, LPA and Administrator conducted a tour of the exterior and interior of facility to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured included but not limited to: residents bedrooms, bathroom, medication closet, kitchen, backyard and the common areas. LPA observed toxins, medication and sharps to be locked and secured. Fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. LPA observed complete first-aid kit. LPA completed the CARE tool and found the facility to be in compliance. Facility meets the perishable and nonperishable food requirements. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. No deficiencies are being cited during todays visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was emailed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Sep 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Graham Gunby and Kerry Hiratsuka arrived on Thursday September 12, 2024 to conduct the unannounced annual inspection. During today's annual inspection, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. LPA reviewed resident (3) and staff (1) files. All resident files contained the required paperwork. All staff files contained the required paperwork. LPAs discussed continuing training to maintain compliance. Facility is compliant with fire drills. LPAs and Administrator Petre toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The areas toured included common areas, resident bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, and backyard. Facility has all required postings. All water temperatures were within the required range. Facility has a fully stocked first aid kit. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was left with administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Aug 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Thursday August 31, 2023 to conduct the unannounced annual inspection. During today's annual inspection, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. LPA reviewed resident (5) and staff (1) files. All resident files contained the required paperwork. All staff files contained the required paperwork. Facility is complaint with fire drills. LPA and Administrator Petre toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The areas toured included resident apartments, resident bathrooms, kitchen, and backyard. Facility has all required postings. All water temperatures were within the required range. Facility has a fully stocked first aid kit. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was emailed to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2023
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 9, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced on 08/09/2022 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met with Licensee, Petre Mile, and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms and contacted licensee and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA were screened by Licensee upon entering the facility. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with Licensee to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, three (3) resident bedrooms, one (1) bathrooms, kitchen, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA and Licensee completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. During today's visit, LPA dropped of PPE supplies to the facility. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 9, 2022
Mar 1, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: - Resident not allowed to converse with other residents. - Facility is witholding personal property. - Staff did not allow resident to receive occupational therapy services.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced on 03/01/2022 to deliver a complaint finding for a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 09/30/2021. LPA met with Licensee, Petre Mile, and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA completed a facility risk assessment at the facility. LPA ensured the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn Surgical Mask. Throughout the course of the complaint investigation the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the allegation listed above.The Department had requested the facility to submit staff roster, resident roster, resident’s (R1’s) LIC 624 Physician’s report, admission agreement and medical documents. Allegation: Resident not allowed to converse with other residents. - Unfounded. Unfounded The Department received statement from a total of four (4) residents and two (2) facility staff. Statement received from all four (4) residents were consistent. All residents denied that the facility does not allowed resident to converse with one another. Allegation: Facility is withholding personal property. – Unfounded. According to complainant, R1’s T.V was not installed in the bedroom and R1’s magnifying glass to help assist with reading has not been returned to R1. R1's audio book recorder has gone missing. On 10/07/2021, the Department investigated and observed a T.V installed in R1’s bedroom. Interview with R1 revealed that there was no need for Licensee to install R1’s T.V in the bedroom because there was one installed and ready to be used. Interview with Licensee indicated that R1 had moved into the facility about two (2) months ago. R1 had personal belongings that needed to be stored such as furniture. Licensee stated he usually do not allow residents to store personal belongings at the facility, but he made an exception for R1. Interview statement received from R1 indicated that T.V, magnifying glasses, and audio book recorder had all been located. Allegation: Staff did not allow resident to receive occupational therapy services. – Unfounded. According to Complainant, R1 had an appointment at the facility with Physical Therapist but Licensee refused the appointment for R1. The Department received a total of three (3) interview statements from Clinical (CS) Supervisors and PT. CS1 stated R1 had completed all occupational therapy sessions. There was a total of four (4) weeks of sessions with R1 at the facility. Interview statement received from CS2 indicated R1’s first physical therapy session was on 09/02/2021 and the last session was on 09/24/2021. Interview statement received from CS2 revealed that Licensee had not refused physical therapy session for R1. Interview with PT revealed that Licensee had restricted certain areas at the facility for PT to use while working with R1. PT stated Licensee had an issue with PT walking around the facility and requested for PT to work with R1 in the bedroom. PT mentioned R1’s sessions were also conducted outside. PT stated Licensee had never refused entry. PT stated reasons for restriction given by Licensee is due to COVID-19. Interview statement received from Licensee indicated that the PT working with R1 at the facility was using common areas, entering other residents’ bedrooms, and working in other residents’ bedrooms. Licensee had asked PT to work with R1 in R1’s bedroom and to not go into other residents’ bedrooms. Licensee asked PT and R1 to work in R1’s bedroom or outside the facility. Licensee stated he has never denied resident from receiving physical therapy. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging resident not allowed to converse with other residents and facility is withholding personal property. We have found the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview conducted and report left at the facility. It was discovered that some activities are being provided to residents in care, however; facility is not providing activities beneficial to residents with limitations (e.g residents in wheelchairs). The Department received interview statements from a total of four (4) residents. Interview with R1 indicated activities is provided by the facility such as walking, socializing, crochet, and card games. Interview statement from R2 and R3 indicated the facility does not provide activities. R4 stated is limited to activities but would like to go on walks but does not think staff would allow it. Interview statement received from Licensee indicated residents are not interested in activities. Licensee stated the facility provide books and magazines to residents. Most of the time residents watch TV and socialize with each other. Licensee also mentioned all but one resident is in a wheelchair so physical activities are limited. Licensee stated program description planned activities calendar is outdated and the facility does not follow it. Due to this information CCL finds the allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED. – A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies are cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. Appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 1, 2022 · control 25-AS-20210930162233
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87219(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 8, 2022
87219 Planned Activities. (a) Residents shall be encouraged to maintain and develop their fullest potential for independent living through participation in planned activities. The activities made available shall include:(4) Physical activities such as games, sports and exercise which develop and maintain strength, coordination and range of motion. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview statements from residents in care and Licensee. No physical activities are provided to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 1, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to create new planned activities calendar to incorporate physical activities to promote strength, coordination, and range of motion. Calendar is to be completed and submitted to CCL by POC due date, 03/08/2022.
20211 state visit · 1 document
Sep 1, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced on 09/01/2021 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met with Administrator, Petre Mile, and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms and contacted licensee and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA were screened by administrator upon entering the facility. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with Administrator to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, three (3) resident bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, kitchen, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA and Administrator completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2021
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the April 29, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
Held this license
Mile, Petre, license first issued in 2008.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2008, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 16
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 4
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 3
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2008, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 3 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 4 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Loomis Home Care
Is Loomis Home Care licensed?
The state lists this license as “Closed, Agency Initiated,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Loomis Home Care licensed for?
6 residents while this license was open — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Loomis Home Care been cited?
1 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 16 state visits over the same years.
Is Loomis Home Care still open?
This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
What does Loomis Home Care cost?
This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Among 19 other homes of a similar licensed size across Placer County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,125 to $5,899 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 19 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Loomis Home Care take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license was held by Mile, Petre, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Can Loomis Home Care keep a resident on hospice?
Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license.
Loomis Home Care license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “LOOMIS HOME CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #315002096. The state lists this license as “Closed, Agency Initiated,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- This license covered 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- This license was held by Mile, Petre, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 16 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 16 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 4, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Placer County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$6,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$6,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,600 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,250On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Placer County