Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Lifestyle Home Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Riverside, California

Licensed since 1999Licence #336402994
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · DementiaState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,800 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,100–$4,700
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit3 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 9, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 13, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderMateas, MarySince 1999 · 2 licensed homes

Lifestyle Home Care is a small care home in Riverside — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 1999. Hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Lifestyle Home Care

Is Lifestyle Home Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Lifestyle Home Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Lifestyle Home Care been cited?

2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Lifestyle Home Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Lifestyle Home Care cost?

$3,800 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,100–$4,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 31 other homes of a similar licensed size in Riverside that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,925 to $4,725 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 31 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Lifestyle Home Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Mateas, Mary, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Riverside Community Hospital is 1.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Lifestyle Home Care keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Lifestyle Home Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “LIFESTYLE HOME CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #336402994. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Mateas, Mary, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY CLIENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE. MAY RETAIN TWO HOSPICE CLIENTS AT ANY ONE TIME.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,800a month to start

Likely $3,100–$4,700

From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,800a month

Likely $3,100–$4,900

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,800likely $3,100–$4,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,100–$4,900
$3,800
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,650–$8,100
$5,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

15 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,800–$4,800.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 15 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 5377 Carol Way, Riverside, CA 92509Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 1999. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 13, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
11
Most recent visit
July 13, 2026
Occupied · September 9, 2024 visit
3 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated August 2, 2022 to September 9, 2024. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations2typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1999.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025110202412020232312022330

The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jul 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Mary Mateas, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). License capacity of (6) non-ambulatory residents and a current census of (4). Hospice waiver for (2). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: LPA inspected the facility inside and out. Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. Facility has no outdoor bodies of water. Facility has furniture in good repair for residents in care. Facility has a covered outdoor area and gated front and back yard. LPA inspected the kitchen. The refrigerator temperature is maintained at 40 degrees F. Hot water temperature is maintained at 116.6 degrees F in the kitchen and 117.6 in the bathrooms. Facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for the number of residents in care. A monthly menu is posted in the kitchen. Facility has sufficient cups, plates, and utensils for residents in care. Facility food is stored in a safe and healthful manner. LPA inspected client bedrooms. Bedrooms are equipped with mattresses, night stands, pillows, chairs, and storage space. Bedrooms have sufficient linen and lighting. LPA inspected client bathrooms. Bathrooms are equipped with handrails and operating in safe and sanitary conditions. Bathrooms hot water temperature is maintained at 105.6. degrees F. LPA observed the facility is equipped with operating carbon monoxide alarms and fully charged fire extinguisher. Facility has operating telephone service on the premises. Posters such as personal rights, Licensing complaint contact number, Ombudsman contact number, emergency phone numbers are posted in a common area. Emergency drill was conducted on 06/10/2026. Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, and toxins are kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Sharps are kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Client medications are kept in a safe and locked cabinet inaccessible to clients in care. All medication are labeled and administered as prescribed. Three staff files reviewed had First Aid Certifications, fingerprint clearances/exemptions, health screenings, training, employee applications. All client records (3) reviewed had admissions agreements, medical assessment, needs service plans, record of personal property. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. No deficiencies were cited during today's visitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 13, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Aug 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Mary Mateas, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). License capacity of (6) non-ambulatory residents and a current census of (3). Hospice waiver for (2). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: LPA inspected the facility inside and out. Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. Facility has no outdoor bodies of water. Facility has furniture in good repair for residents in care. Facility has a covered outdoor area and gated front and back yard. LPA inspected the kitchen. The refrigerator temperature is maintained at 40 degrees F. Hot water temperature is maintained at 105.6 degrees F. Facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for the number of residents in care. A monthly menu is posted in the kitchen. Facility has sufficient cups, plates, and utensils for residents in care. Facility food is stored in a safe and healthful manner. LPA inspected client bedrooms. Bedrooms are equipped with mattresses, night stands, pillows, chairs, and storage space. Bedrooms have sufficient linen and lighting. LPA inspected client bathrooms. Bathrooms are equipped with handrails and operating in safe and sanitary conditions. Bathrooms hot water temperature is maintained at 105.6. degrees F. LPA observed the facility is equipped with operating carbon monoxide alarms and fully charged fire extinguisher. Facility has operating telephone service on the premises. Posters such as personal rights, Licensing complaint contact number, Ombudsman contact number, emergency phone numbers are posted in a common area. Emergency drill was conducted on 6/10/24. Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, and toxins are kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Sharps are kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Client medications are kept in a safe and locked cabinet inaccessible to clients in care. All medication are labeled and administered as prescribed. Three staff files reviewed had First Aid Certifications, fingerprint clearances/exemptions, health screenings, training, employee applications. All client records (3) reviewed had admissions agreements, medical assessment, needs service plans, record of personal property. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. No deficiencies were cited during today's visitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2025
20241 state visit · 2 documents
Sep 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation LPA Prieto met with Administrator Mary Mateas and explained the elements of the complaint. Regarding the allegation that staff hit resident in care, LPA Prieto interviewed resident #1 (R1), in question, and expressed that staff does not hit or mistreat R1 while in care. LPA interviewed R2, who states that staff does not hit R2 or witnessed staff hit any other resident in care. LPA interviewed R3, who states that staff does not hit R2 or witnessed staff hit any other resident in care. Unsubstantiated LPA Prieto interviewed staff #1 (S1), who states that S1 has not hit any resident in care or witnessed any other staff hit resident while in care. LPA Prieto interviewed staff #2 (S2), who states that S2 has not hit any resident in care or witnessed any other staff hit resident while in care. Based on the information obtained there is not enough evidence that staff hit resident in care. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. This report was signed by LPA Prieto and Administrator Mary Mateas and a copy was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240904160642
Sep 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Mary Mateas, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). License capacity of (6) non-ambulatory residents and a current census of (3). Hospice waiver for (2). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: LPA inspected the facility inside and out. Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. Facility has no outdoor bodies of water. Facility has furniture in good repair for residents in care. Facility has a covered outdoor area and gated front and back yard. LPA inspected the kitchen. The refrigerator temperature is maintained at 40 degrees F. Hot water temperature is maintained at 117.6 degrees F. Facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for the number of residents in care. A monthly menu is posted in the kitchen. Facility has sufficient cups, plates, and utensils for residents in care. Facility food is stored in a safe and healthful manner. LPA inspected client bedrooms. Bedrooms are equipped with mattresses, night stands, pillows, chairs, and storage space. Bedrooms have sufficient linen and lighting. LPA inspected client bathrooms. Bathrooms are equipped with handrails and operating in safe and sanitary conditions. Bathrooms hot water temperature is maintained at 105 degrees and 117 degrees F. LPA observed the facility is equipped with operating carbon monoxide alarms and fully charged fire extinguisher. Facility has operating telephone service on the premises. Posters such as personal rights, Licensing complaint contact number, Ombudsman contact number, emergency phone numbers are posted in a common area. Emergency drill was conducted on 9/10/24. Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, and toxins are kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Sharps are kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Client medications are kept in a safe and locked cabinet inaccessible to clients in care. All medication are labeled and administered as prescribed. Three staff files reviewed had First Aid Certifications, fingerprint clearances/exemptions, health screenings, training, employee applications. All client records (3) reviewed had admissions agreements, medical assessment, needs service plans, record of personal property. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2024
20231 state visit · 2 documents
Sep 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in resident #1 (R1) sustaining an unstageable pressure injury. Staff did not notify resident's authorized person of a change in health condition.

On 09/29/2023 at 01:00 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Melody Brown and Bianca Wolcott met with Licensee/Administrator Mary Mateas and staff Steven Mateas at Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Adult and Senior Care (ASC) Regional Office to deliver the findings of the above allegations. LPA Brown explained the purpose of the requested Office Visit. The Department investigation included interviewing staff, residents, collecting pertinent records and records review. Based on the evidence collected during the investigation, the Department staff determined that there was corroborating evidence that Resident 1 (R1) sustained a stage 3 pressure sore while in care (Allegation #1). Department staff reviewed R1’s medical records. Medical records show that on 04/03/2022, R1 was transported to the hospital and unstageable pressure ulcer in R1’s sacral area was observed on hospital admission and R1 was later diagnosed with “Unstageable Sacral Area on Admission. *** Continuation in LIC9099 *** Substantiated R1 was admitted to the facility in 2019. R1 was considered non-ambulatory and used a wheelchair for mobility. R1 was paralyzed on right side of body and had limited mobility. Physician assessment in facility records indicates that R1 was incontinent and needed staff assistance with toileting needs, including changing of incontinent briefs. In addition, R1 needed care and assistance with activities of daily living such as bathing, dressing, and eating. R1 did not have a history of skin breakdown, according to assessment. Per investigation, R1 did require two people for transfer. Per staff interviews, something described as a “small scratch” was observed on R1’s sacral area on March 31, 2022, several days prior to being admitted to the hospital. According to facility documentation, the area was described on April 1, 2022, as “red (irritation).” Facility staff did not seek medical assistance regarding these observations. Rather, facility staff treated the “scratch” with “diaper cream” and Neosporin. In addition, facility staff reported that R1 would spend most of the day in a recliner or wheelchair. Investigation revealed that on April 3, 2022, R1 was admitted to the hospital due to vomiting. Upon admission, medical records show that R1 was diagnosed with an unstageable pressure injury to sacral area, with a Stage 1 pressure injury to mid upper back and abrasions to right hand and right knee. Facility records nor staff interviews revealed observations of pressure injuries as diagnosed. Based on the Department investigation, it is concluded that there is sufficient evidence to substantiate allegation of staff neglect of R1. It was evident that R1 required staff assistance with activities of daily living, including incontinent care. However, it was found that facility staff failed to provide the services needed by R1 to meet R1 needs. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** As a result, R1 sustained an unstageable pressure injury to sacral area while in care. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation(s) is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An immediate Civil Penalty in the amount of $500.00 was assessed. The licensee was informed that a civil penalty might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(f). Regarding allegation #2, Staff did not notify resident's authorized person of a change in health condition, LPA Brown determined that there was corroborating evidence that staff did not notify R1’s authorized person, the Inland Regional Center (IRC), of a change in health condition. Interview with Staff 1 (S1) indicated that Staff 2 and Staff 3 did not report a change in health condition specifically R1’s pressure injury to S1. In addition, an interview with IRC Consumer Services Coordinator revealed that staff did not notify them of R1’s change in health condition, and specifically indicated that no pressure injury was reported to them, and they only found out of the reported change of health condition from the hospital. Based on the information and interviews gathered the allegation Staff neglect resulted in resident #1 (R1) sustaining an unstageable pressure injury (Allegation #1) and Staff did not notify resident's authorized person of a change in health condition (Allegation #2), are SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation(s) is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Please see LIC9099D for deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC9099), LIC9099D, LIC421IM and Appeal Rights were discussed, and a copy was provided to Licensee/Administrator Mary Mateas and staff Steven Mateas at the conclusion of the visit. Evidence shows that the facility staff called American Medical Response (911) on April 3 for R1’s complaint of Nausea and Vomiting. Staff interviews revealed that R1 was not exhibiting any unusual behavior or complaining of pain. Moreover, it was reported that facility staff monitored R1’s blood pressure and oxygen levels until emergency services arrived. There is insufficient evidence to prove that Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner. The evidence also demonstrates that the facility acted appropriately by calling AMR when R1 complaint of nausea/vomiting and monitored R1’s blood pressure and oxygen levels. Therefore, based on the evidence obtained during the Department's investigation, the allegation of Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner is unsubstantiated at this time. Although the allegation Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Mary Mateas and staff Steven Mateas.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2023 · control 56-AS-20220407125449

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 30, 2023

87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following…(4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency… This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews & records review, it was found that Licensee did not ensure R1 received the care, supervision & services to meet their needs. On April 3, 2022, R1 was admitted to the hospital and was diagnosed with an unstageable pressure injury to their sacral. However, it was found that treatment and care for the injury was not being provided as needed. This violation of regulation posed an immediate risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2023

Plan of correction: The licensee stated to train all staff on CCR 87468.2 (a) (4) and submit Training Log to LPA Brown by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: Sep 30, 2023

87466 Observation of the Resident The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional, and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews and record review, the Licensee did not comply with section cited above by not reporting to R1's physician and R1's responsible person the observed changes or deterioration of R1's physical health condition and by not ensuring that such changes are documented which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risks to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2023

Plan of correction: The licensee stated to train all staff on CCR 87466 and submit Training Log to LPA Brown by POC due date.

Sep 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 09/29/2023 at 01:00 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Melody Brown and Bianca Wolcott met with Licensee/Administrator Mary Mateas and Steven Mateas at Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Adult and Senior Care (ASC) Regional Office to initiate a Case Management Office Visit. LPAs Brown and Wolcott explained the purpose of the requested Office Visit. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews and a review of pertinent documentation. During the Inland Regional Center (IRC) facility visit on 04/25/2022, IRC staff reported that Staff 2 (S2) has not received Direct Support Professional (DSP) – I certification which should have been obtained 01/31/2020 and Staff 3 (S3) has not received the required Direct Support Professional (DSP) – II certification which should have been obtained 04/30/2022. LPA Brown will be issuing a citation for this deficiency as this poses immediate risk to residents in care. In addition, IRC staff reported that during their visit, it was observed that no Physician Oder on file for both “Calmoseptine” and “Neosporin” for Resident 1 (R1) and its administration were not recorded on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Moreover, during the IRC Visit, they observed that there’s no Physician Order, Medical Documentation or Plan on file to support that the facility staff were required to assist with R1’s glucose testing and monitoring. Also, per IRC’s review of documents, the administration of glucose testing was not recorded in MAR and no documentation was available to support that the S2 or S3 received training by licensed professional for glucose testing. IRC staff also observed during the visit that there is a prescription on file at the facility for R1 to take Ensure or Glucerna one (1) can twice per day, but it was also observed that the administration of Ensure or Glucerna is not being documented in the MAR. LPA Brown will be issuing a citation for these deficiencies as this poses immediate risk to residents in care. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC809), LIC80D and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Mary Mateas and staff Steven Mateas.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(c)(2)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 30, 2023

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (c) All RCFE staff who assist residents with personal activities of daily living shall receive initial and annual... (2) This training shall be...(B) Importance and techniques of personal care... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews and record review, the Licensee did not comply with section cited above by having S2 and S3 worked at the facility without the required initial/annual training which poses immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to submit Proof of Required Trainings of all staff to LPA Brown by POC due date. Licensee stated to submit a Signed Statement of Understanding on CCR 87411(c)(2)(B) by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(h)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 30, 2023

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications...(6) The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews and record review, the Licensee did not comply with section cited above by not documenting in R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) the administration of Calmoseptine and Neosporin, the administration of glucose testing was not recorded in MAR and Ensure or Glucerna per prescription issued which poses immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to train all staff on CCR 87465(h)(6) and submit Training Log to LPA Brown by POC due date. Licensee stated to submit Signed Statement of Understanding on CCR87465(h)(6) to LPA Brown by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87628(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 30, 2023

87628 Diabetes (a) The licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain a resident who has diabetes if the resident is able to perform his/her own glucose testing with blood or urine specimens and is able to administer his/her own medication including medication administered orally or through injection, or has it administered by an appropriately skilled professional. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and records review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by allowing Staff #2 (S2) to perform blood glucose testing to Resident #1 (R1) which pose immediate health, safety and personal rights risks to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to train all staff on CCR 87628(a) and will submit Training Log to LPA Brown by POC due date. Licensee stated to not allow staffs to perform blood glucose testing to residents and will only allow appropriately skilled professional to perform blood glucose check and will submit signed Statement of Understanding on CCR 87628(a) to LPA Brown by POC due date.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Mateas, Mary, licensed since 1999, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Riverside County