Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

J & L Guest Home

Mid-size home·Licensed for 32·Empire, California

Licensed since 1983Licence #500309303
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,400 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $2,650–$4,450
  • Home sizeLicensed for 32Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit29 of 32 beds occupiedMarch 10, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitSeptember 15, 2026CDSS inspection record

J & L Guest Home is a mid-size care home in Empire — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 32 residents since 1983. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about J & L Guest Home

Is J & L Guest Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is J & L Guest Home licensed for?

32 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has J & L Guest Home been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 1983, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.

Is J & L Guest Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does J & L Guest Home cost?

$3,400 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,650–$4,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 12 other homes of a similar licensed size across Stanislaus County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $2,900 to $4,950 a month, and the middle figure is $3,400 (n = 12 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does J & L Guest Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Little, Jerry J. & Louise, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Memorial Medical Center is 4.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can J & L Guest Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

J & L Guest Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “J & L GUEST HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #500309303. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 32 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Little, Jerry J. & Louise, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1983, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 13 state inspection visits since 1983, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 1983, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 1983, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 15, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
APPROVED FOR 15 AMBULATORY, 6 NONAMBULATORY, AND 11 BEDRIDDEN CLIENTS, AGES 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 2 HOSPICE.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,400a month to start

Likely $2,650–$4,450

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,400a month

Likely $2,650–$4,650

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,400likely $2,650–$4,450

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $2,650–$4,650
$3,400
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,250–$7,750
$5,400
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

10 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,100–$5,050.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 237 S Abbie Street, Empire, CA 95319Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 13 visits since 1983. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 15, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
13
Most recent visit
September 15, 2026
Occupied · March 10, 2026 visit
29 of 32 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 28, 2023 to March 10, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints3typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1983.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020253302024220202333020221102021220

The last 36 months — 9 of 13 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Noel Wolf Petersn arrived unannounced to conduct a one year required inspection visit. LPA Wolf Petersen was met by Administrator Renee Little and explained the purpose of the visit to staff. Physical faciltiy inspected/toured the physical plant including but not limited to the kitchen, dining room, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, laundry area, living area and other common areas, as well as outside of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. Facility is a 32 bed facility with a current census of 29. There is entry door leading to the living room, kitchen with a hallway to the bedrooms and bathrooms. Chemicals and medications are locked to residents in care. No bodies of water were observed at the facility. Hot water temperature was measured in resident bathroom sink, which is within the required range of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. All necessary Administrator documents were in place, hiv to be sent to LPA via email by 9/23/26. LPA observed the following posted on the facility wall: Facility license, sketch, See Something Say Something poster, Ombudsman poster, Theft and Loss Policy, Resident Bill of Rights, Rights of Resident/Family Councils. LPA observed the facility to have adequate food supply of 7- days non-perishables and 2- days perishables in place. Resident rooms were sanitary and had the required furniture and furnishings. LPA observed, fire extinguishers were dated on 04/01/2026 and current, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors functional, central heating and air functional in the facility. The first aid kit was found in compliance. LPA reviewed 5 staff files. LPA reviewed three resident facility files and was in compliance. LPA needs to review the fire clearance, follow up may be required. facility side clearance says 6 bedridden, per 2025 check by the fire department. No deficiencies cited today during today’s visit, exit interview held and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2026
Mar 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff member purchased drugs during work hours

On 03/10/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA Pascua met with Facility House Manager (HM), Sarah Rico and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit was to inform the facility and its representative that a complaint has been filed against it at this time. Current census was 29. A brief interview with HM Rico was conducted. During the course of this visit, this LPA conducted staff interviews, reviewed facility records, and toured the facility. It was alleged that a staff member purchased drugs during work hours. According to the information received, a male staff member was reportedly seen in front of the facility on 03/07/2026 at approximately 10:00 p.m. purchasing drugs from an outside source.Based on interviews conducted with four facility staff members, all denied that any staff left the facility to purchase drugs during their work hours. Unfounded All four staff members also denied personally purchasing drugs while on duty.Additionally, management staff stated that there were no male staff members on site at the facility until 11:00 p.m. on 03/07/2026. LPA Pascua reviewed the facility’s staffing schedule and learned that on 03/07/2026 there were three female staff members working the PM shift from 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., and three female staff members and one male staff member working the graveyard shift from 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. This information was confirmed through a review of the facility’s staff time cards.Furthermore, all staff members who were on site beginning at 11:00 p.m. stated that they were aware of each staff member’s whereabouts during their shift and reported that no staff left the facility to purchase drugs. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility staff purchased drugs during work hours. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260309103642
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

On 09/23/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived unannounced to the community to conduct a Health and Safety check. LPA Campbell met with Administrator Little and explained the purpose of the visit to ensure the health and safety of residents. There are currently 7 staff present and 29 residents. The community is currently licensed to serve 32 ambulatory and nonambulatory clients that are age 60 and over. The community is also approved for 2 hospice residents as well. During a tour of the community, LPA Campbell observed resident bedrooms that were sufficiently furnished with beds that were made. Residents were observed watching TV in their rooms or the common area. LPA Campbell observed an adequate 2 day perishable and 7 day nonperishable food supply. The refrigerator and cabinets were reviewed in the kitchen. Sharps were made inaccessible to residents in locked cabinets. Medications were locked in a closet in the staff office where it can be locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA Campbell conducted a brief interview with R1. R1 was lying in their bed in the room that they share with their roommate watching the single TV present in the room. When questioned about their status, R1 stated that they loved the community and liked their room. They also stated that the only thing they wanted was their TV that had been left. Based on the observations made during this visit, there are no deficiencies being cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2025
Aug 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 08/21/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA Campbell met with Renee Little, Administrator and Sarah Rico, House Manager and explained the purpose of the visit. There are currently 29 people in residence in the facility. The facility is a one story building licensed to serve 32 ambulatory or non-ambulatory clients, age 60 and over. It is also approved for 2 hospice residents. LPA Campbell inspected the physical plant including bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchens and common areas. LPA Campbell observed the community to be well lit, clean, free from odor and in good repair. During a tour of the community, the fire extinguishers were observed to have last been inspected on 05/06/2025 and were fully charged. Staff conducted smoke and carbon monoxide alarm tests and they were found to be functioning. The temperature for the inside of the physical plant was observed to be 70 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 68 and 85 degrees. The water temperature for the resident bathrooms was measured at 118 degree Fahrenheit. There are no bodies of water present on the premises. Food items were stored in indoor and outdoor settings and a two day supply of perishables and a seven day supply of non-perishables were observed. The refrigerator temperature was observed at 38 degrees Fahrenheit and the freezer at 0 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Campbell observed that a sign on the front of the refrigerator stated, "Do Not Put Anything in Here Without a Label and a Date". Throughout the physical plant, LPA Campbell observed 'See Something Say Something' posters and contact information for the Long Term Care Ombudsman. LPA Campbell observed resident rooms 10, 11 and 13. They contained the required beds, lamps, closets and chest of drawers. Due to some residents having wheelchairs and/or other personal preferences, residents either had desks or chose to not have a night stand. LPA Campbell observed the first aid supply kit as having scissors, tweezers, thermometers and a first aid manual. Access to knives and cleaning products were found to be inaccessible to residents. Of the 29 residents, LPA Campbell reviewed 3 of their files. For the 24 staff. 3 of their files were reviewed. All files reviewed were found to be complete.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025
Feb 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident's oxygen tanks were secured in a stand

On 02/12/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived to the facility unannounced to open a complaint. LPA Campbell met with Sarah Rico, House Manager, and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that staff did not ensure resident's oxygen tanks were secured in a stand, LPA Campbell interviewed staff and conducted a search for unsecured oxygen tanks in R1's (R1) room. Staff 1 (S1) stated that R1's oxygen was with them at all times and at night. LPA Campbell also observed R1 with his oxygen in the living room. The tank was a DeVilbiss 5 Liter Oxygen Concentrator which is not an oxygen tank but a method of gathering oxygen from the surroundings and concentrating it for breathing.Emergency oxygen tanks were observed in the locked medicine closet in the office in a stand. Due to the above noted information, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, and therefore this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6 nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250205120513
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA Campbell met with Renee Little, Administrator and Sarah Rico, House Manager and explained the purpose of the visit. Residents were observed throughout the facility socializing with peers and staff and eating. The facility was clear of debris and passages were unobstructed. LPA Campbell toured the facility and inspected common areas, the kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, and backyard areas to ensure there are no safety hazards for residents. Furnishings were sufficient to meet the needs of residents. In each bedroom was a bed, tables, lamps and chair. No changes have been made to the floor plan in comparison to the facility sketch provided. All bedrooms are designed to be shared with two residents. Of the 20 staff files available, LPA Campbell was able to review 4 staff files and found them to be complete. Of the 27 client files, LPA Campbell was able to view 3 client files and the required documents were found to be included. All active staff were found to be cleared in Guardian. LPA Campbell reviewed the certificate for Administrator Renee Little that expired on 09/17/2024 and proof of renewal. In the physical plant, the temperature for a freezer is to be no higher then 0 degrees Fahrenheit. Of the 1 freezer found in the facility, the temperature was -1 degrees Fahrenheit. Refrigerator temperatures are to be no higher than 45 degrees Fahrenheit. Of the two refrigerators found on the premises, both had a temperature of 40 degrees Fahrenheit. Hot water must be between 105 and 120 degrees Fahrenheit. The temperature for the hot water in the resident bathroom was 116 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility temperature was 72 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 68 and 85 degrees. The backyard was toured by LPA Campbell and pathways and exits were found to be clear. Staff parking is in the back of the facility along with a locked tool storage, locked refrigerator and food pantry shed. LPA Campbell observed first aid supplies, a fully-charged and up-to-date fire extinguisher that was last checked on 03/08/2024 and working carbon monoxide/smoke detectors that were tested by staff during the visit. LPA Campbell observed a minimum 2-day supply of perishable food and a minimum 7-day supply of nonperishable food. LPA Campbell observed locked closets and cabinets for the storage of medication and P&I. LPA Campbell also observed locked storage areas for cleaning solutions in the staff bathroom. Per California Code of Regulations (CCR's) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6, no deficiencies are being cited. An exit interview was conducted with Renee Little and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2024
Jan 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 1/10/23 at 1:15pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived unannounced to conduct two case management visits regarding a resident fall incident report on 01/04/2023 and a peer to peer altercation which occurred on 01/03/2024. LPA met with Renee Little, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA reviewed an incident report dated 01/04/2023 and conducted a brief interview with Sarah Rico, House Manager. Based on an incident report, on 01/04/2023 resident 1 (R1) became agitated after their routine was disrupted by another peer (R2). An altercation resulted in which R1 pinched R2 on the stomach. R2 responded by punching R1 in the eye, resulting in a black eye. Based on an incident report and interview, R2 had no noticeable injuries but was taken to the hospital for X rays due to an older injury. The incident was reported to the licensing department, the service coordinators for both R1 and R2, and R1’s father within regulatory time frames. A team meeting for staff was held on 01/04/2023. The House Manager discussed factors that may be contributing to R1’s aggression such as the loss of her mother in addition to the holidays. Staff were urged to identify moments in R1’s routine when she is most likely to be triggered. Staff would then redirect R1 by supporting them in being patient when other residents disrupt the schedule and/or help R1 to make better behavioral choices The incident for R3 occurred on 01/04/2023. R3 uses a walker and usually showers while staff monitors them. The House Manager stated that R3 self reported that he had gotten into the shower on his own without staff monitoring him and had fallen and gotten himself up. R3 was unable to recount when the fall occurred other than “a few days ago”. None of the staff reported observing R3 fall during a shower. R3 reported he was sore and in pain on 01/04/23 and was asked if he wanted to go to the ER but declined. The next day, House Manager Sarah Rico inquired about his arm and R3 reported that it was “a little sore” per the House Manager. R3 is now scheduled to be seen by a Nurse Practitioner for a home visit on 01/15/2023 instead. This is the first incident of falling in the shower with R3. R3’s Service Coordinator Juanita Cardona was informed of the fall. Staff urged R3 to inform them if he wanted a shower in the future. A review of R3’s 602 shows that he is non-ambulatory and uses a walker and that he must be monitored when showering. This is the first known incident when R3 tried to get in the shower on his own. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 ,and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 80078(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 17, 2023

80078 Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision a) The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the client's needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and record review, the facility did not provide supervision as necessary to meet the client’s needs. Which poses a potential Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees provide reassessment for R3 with updated 602 and will submit a plan outlinining procedures on maintaining awareness of residents whereabouts. Plan to be submitted to LPA by POC due date.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 2, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 11-02-23 at 3:00 pm, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Renee Campbell arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit regarding an incident which occurred on 10/03/23. LPA Campbell met with Administrator Renee Little and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested facility file documentation including physician's report for resident 1 (R1) and hospital discharge paperwork for R1. LPA also conducted facility observation and reviewed incident report dated 10-04-23. Additionally, LPA conducted brief interview with Administrator. Based on incident report and interviews, the following was determined: R1 was taken to the hospital on 09/01/23 and evaluated. Based on discharge paperwork reviewed, R1 had contracted pneumonia and received antibiotics for treatment. R1 went to the hospital again due to a pressure wound on 10/03/23 and passed away that afternoon at approximately 4:42 pm. Per the death certificate, R1’s death was due to sepsis and pneumonia was listed as a contributing factor. As a result of this case management, no citations are issued today. An exit interview was conducted with Renee Little and a copy of this report was provided to Renee Little.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2023
Sep 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Consumer sustained unexplained bruising while in care.

Unannounced complaint visit made out to this facility on 09/28/2023 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility house manager, Sarah Rico, who was requested by this LPA to go ahead and contact the facility designated Administrator, Renee Little, to inform her that CCL was present at this time. Current census was 29 residents. The facility designated Administrator, Renee Little, arrived shortly thereafter to this facility while this LPA was conducting this complaint visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver and present the findings of this investigation to this facility and it's representatives at this time. Based on interviews and information gathered throughout the course of this investigation, it was learned that R1 would often get picked up and taken out of this facility from time to time by their loved ones. It was learned that while seated in the vehicle, R1 attempted to put on the seatbelt and had a hard time in doing so. It was learned that while R1 was wrestling with the seat belt in trying to pull it out far enough so that R1 Unsubstantiated could insert the clip into the buckle, R1 was pushing up against the seat and thrashing around in the back seat. It was learned that it was difficult for R1 to locate the buckle and get the seat belt to click securely. Based on interviews, these actions caused R1 to sustain bruises to the shoulder areas and parts of the arms. It was learned that this incident took place on the weekend away from this facility and the bruising did not show up until later on the week after returning to this facility. As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated meant that although the allegations may have happened or was valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. There were no deficiencies observed or cited at this time. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230717130540
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Stanislaus County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Stanislaus County