Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Integrated Care Communities - B1

Mid-size home·Licensed for 20·Moreno Valley, California

Licensed since 2001Licence #336405885Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,800 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,000–$5,000
  • Home sizeLicensed for 20Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 20 beds occupiedOctober 2, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitOctober 24, 2025CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderCalifornia Drug Consultants, Inc.Since 2001 · 4 licensed homes

Integrated Care Communities - B1 is a mid-size care home in Moreno Valley — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 20 residents since 2001. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Integrated Care Communities - B1

Is Integrated Care Communities - B1 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Integrated Care Communities - B1 licensed for?

20 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Integrated Care Communities - B1 been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2001, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Integrated Care Communities - B1 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Integrated Care Communities - B1 cost?

$3,800 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,000–$5,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size in Moreno Valley that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,575 to $4,372 a month, and the middle figure is $3,800 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Integrated Care Communities - B1 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by California Drug Consultants, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to California Drug Consultants, Inc. — at least 4 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Riverside University Health System - Medical Center is 0.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Integrated Care Communities - B1 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Integrated Care Communities - B1 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “INTEGRATED CARE COMMUNITIES - B1”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #336405885. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 20 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to California Drug Consultants, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2001, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2001, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2001, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2001, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is October 24, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 20 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
20 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX (6).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Assistance with transfers

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Medication management

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Building is wheelchair accessible

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Diabetes care

    Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Nights & staffing

  • 24-hour supervision claimed

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Emergency call system

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,800a month to start

Likely $3,000–$5,000

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,800a month

Likely $3,000–$5,150

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,800likely $3,000–$5,000

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,000–$5,150
$3,800
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,600–$8,250
$5,800
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$4,450.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 14295 Nason Street, Moreno Valley, CA 92555Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2001. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated October 24, 2025.

On file since
2022
State visits
8
Most recent visit
October 24, 2025
Occupied · October 2, 2025 visit
5 of 20 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated March 22, 2023 to October 2, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints2typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2001.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025330202422020232202022110

The last 36 months — 6 of 8 documents

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On October 09, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the Required Annual Inspection and met with Maria Gaston, Lead Staff. LPA returned to complete the annual on 10/24/2025. The facility file review was conducted at the Regional Office and additional records were requested and reviewed on site. The facility is licensed for 20 Elderly Adults and is currently operating at a capacity of 15. Facility type, Elderly Adults (740). LPA Mixson toured the facility along with the Lead Staff, Juanita Gaston, and made observations pertaining to the annual visit. LPA inspected the facility inside and outside there were no obstructions or debris to the indoor or outdoor passageways at the time of this visit. Additionally, there were no bodies of water on the premises. The facility is a single-story multi building structure home located at 14295 Nason Moreno Valley CA 92555. Physical Plant: The facility phone number is (951) 601-9150 and it is operable. LPA Mixson observed the residents’ bedrooms, and each was equipped with required furniture as per Title 22. LPA Mixson inspected facility bathrooms, and the hot water temperature tested within regulations at. The bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately at the time of this visit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, and fire extinguishers. LPA Mixson observed required postings such as "If you See Something, Say Something,” the "Personal Rights," and the PUB 475. The cleaning supplies and sharp items were kept locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. There was a designated storage space for the residents and staff files, and it was locked and inaccessible to residents in care at the time of this visit. Medications: Were locked and inaccessible to residents in care, and there was a sufficient supply of medication for each resident. The overall facility is clean; the furniture is in good condition. The facility cooling system and other appliances were operable currently at the time of this visit. Administrator informed LPA there were safety lights for night throughout the facility. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient per regulations, and there are a variety of food types available for residents. Dishes and utensils were in sufficient supply and stored properly, and sharp items are locked. Care & Supervision/Administration: Adequate staff are present for the supervision of resident in care. Floor plans, telephone numbers and personal rights were found posted in the facility. The listed administrator possesses a current administrator’s certificate with an expiration date of 06/13/2026. Emely Rodriguez. Records Reviewed Resident Files: LPA reviewed the following forms in the residents files, admission agreements, medical assessments, consent forms, weight records, and emergency information. Appraisal and needs and services plan. Immunization records, along with the TB test. Records Reviewed Staff files: LPA requested and reviewed the following items for the staff records; First Aid, fingerprint clearances, abuse index, personnel records, health screenings, criminal record statements, employee rights, and TB test. Infection Control: LPA Mixson observed the hand washing stations in the facility restrooms. LPA observed PPE equipment and cleaning supplies to do regular cleaning of the facility. LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan and found all required infection control measures. There were no TA deficiencies observed or cited per Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations at this time. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was discussed and given to Lead Staff, Juanita Gaston.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025
Oct 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to ensure a supply of resident's medication Facility failed to assist resident with administration of medications. Facility failed to inform responsible party that medication was not being administered.

On October 2, 2025, the Department of Social Services staff conducted an unannounced visit to this facility to continue investigation of the above allegations and to deliver findings. The Department was met by Administrator Emely Rodriquez and the purpose of the visit was explained. Investigation consisted of the following: On 5/17/22, the Department conducted an unannounced initial visit to the facility to investigate the complaint allegations mentioned above. During the visit, it was determined that the complaint required further investigation. On October 1, 2025, the Department toured facility’s med room, requested and received copies of the following: Staff roster (dated 9/3/25) Resident Roster (dated 10/1/25), R1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR)-dated March 2022, April 2022, May 2022, R1 physician’s report (dated 2/17/22), Needs and Services Plan (dated 10/10/23), Medication audit sheet (dated 5/25/22), staff medication training (dated: 7/3/25, 6/25/25, 6/15/25, 5/30/25, 4/25/25, 4/9/25). The Department conducted interviews with 4 staff (S1-S4 ) and Administrator (A1). The Department interviewed 4 residents (R2-R5). Page 1 of 5 Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Facility failed to ensure a supply of resident's medication. The detail of complaint alleges that there was a pharmacy change at the facility, and the pharmacy had trouble filling R1’s medication resulting in R1 only receiving 2 out of 9 of R1’ medications. On October 1, 2025, the Department obtained, reviewed and evaluated R1 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2022, April 2022 and May 2022. Records revealed that all R1's medications, including PRNs were given and properly initialed by staff; no discrepancies found. Additionally, the records reveal there weren’t any lapses in medication administration during the specified time frame as indicated in the complaint. On October 1, 2025 at 9:35am, The Department interviewed Administrator (A1), who denied the allegation stating there were no reports of R1 missing medication as mentioned in the complaint. A1 went on to state that in the event a resident medication has not arrived due to any issue, the facility's pharmacy will provide them an emergency supply of medication until issue is resolved so that resident is not missing the medication. On October 1, 2025, between 10:00am and 11:00am, The Department interviewed 4 staff regarding the allegation and of those interviewed, 4 out 4 stated that at no time has R1 missed any of her medication. Additionally, 4 out of 4 stated that medications for all residents are dispensed as prescribed and are on time. Page 2 of 5 On October 1, 2025 between 11:00am and 12:00pm, the Department interviewed 4 Residents (R-2 -R5). The Department was unable to interview R1 as she reportedly moved out of facility on 12/31/24. No contact information provided. Of those interviewed, 4 out of 4 state they receive their medication as prescribed and on time and they have never missed medication due to staff not giving it. Based on the information gathered, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation mentioned above; Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Allegation: Facility failed to assist resident with administration of medications. The detail of the complaint alleges that R1 had not received the medication for her depression and pain. On October 1, 2025, the Department obtained, reviewed and evaluated R1 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2022, April 2022 and May 2022 in addition to the facility medication audit sheet (dated 5/25/22) which showed medication given and accounted for. Lastly, the Department also observed that any discontinued medication was properly noted on the MAR. On October 1, 2025, at 9:35am, The Department interviewed Administrator (A1), who denied the allegation stating medications are always given and there have been no reports of missed medication. Additionally, A1 expressed that if a resident’s medication runs out, “our pharmacy would give an emergency supply of medication so that Residents won’t miss their medication.” Page 3 of 5 On October 1, 2025, between 10:00am and 11:00am, The Department interviewed 4 staff regarding the allegation and of those interviewed, 4 out 4 stated that at no time has R1 missed any of her medication. Additionally, 4 out of 4 stated that medications for all residents are dispensed as prescribed and are on time. On October 1, 2025 between 11:00am and 12:00pm, the Department interviewed 4 Residents (R-2 -R5). Of those interviewed, 4 out of 4 residents state that they receive their medication as prescribed and on time and they have never missed medication due to staff not giving it. Based on the information gathered there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation mentioned above; Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Allegation: Facility failed to inform responsible party that medication was not being administered. The detail of complaint alleges that R1’s Responsible Party received an invoice from the pharmacy which showed that most of R1’s medications ran out March 19, 2022, and 1 other medication ran out April 4, 2022. On October 1, 2025, the Department conducted interview with A1 who denied the allegation stating that there was no missed medication, so there wasn’t a need to contact responsible party. A1 further explained that it is their practice to notify the responsible party if there are changes or if medications are “running low.” Lastly, A1 stated that not only do they inform the responsible party, but they also contact the resident’s Primary Care Physician. Page 4 of 5 The review of R1’s MARs was consistent with A1’s assertion of no missed medication during that time frame. Based on the information gathered there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation mentioned above; Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. There were no deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted with Administrator Emely Rodriguez and copy of report provided. Page 5 of 5the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025 · control 18-AS-20220511152553
Jan 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On January 10, 2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Abdoulaye Zerbo and Seo Jeon did an unannounced visit to conduct a case management, and met with the Administrator Emely Rodriguez. LPAs introduced themselves and stated the purpose of the visit. LPAs toured the facility, along with the Administrator Emely Rodriguez, conducted interviews and made observations. The facility have three(3) staff per shift attending the residents' needs and conducting rounds every hour or more frequently if needed. There were no imminent health and/or safety concerns observed at the time of visit. LPAs did not observe any obstructions or debris inside or outside of the facility at the time of this visit. LPAs observed that the facility is using a generator as a source of power due to the outage. LPAs assessed the available food and observed sufficient food to be available for the residents in care. The food supply meets the requirement of a two-day supply of perishable foods and a seven-day supply of non-perishable foods. . The medications were found to be in sufficient supply, locked, and inaccessible to the residents in care. The facility is clean, and meets all the requirements for the residents in care. Based on the information obtained during today's visit, there were no immediate health and safety issues of the residents in care. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator, Emely Rodriguez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit for a required annual inspection. The LPA was greeted by the Administrator Emely Rodriguez notified her of the purpose for the visit and was allowed to enter the facility to conduct the inspection. Facility Overview: The facility is a single story building with 10 residents bedrooms, and 11 bathrooms. There is no gated pool and there are no firearms on the premises. Infection Control: LPA observed that hygiene and cleaning supplies were available for regular facility maintenance. The facility’s infection control plan was reviewed and found to meet department requirements. Physical Plant: The physical plant, including floors, windows, and doors, was clean and well maintained. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair. Laundry equipment was in good working condition. Sharp and dangerous objects were securely locked in a kitchen cabinet and inaccessible to residents. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide detector were operational. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be in compliance with the department requirements and with an expiration date of 07/15/2025. LPA observed the hot water temperature to meet requirements at 107.1°F. Food Service: The facility’s kitchen was clean and equipped to prepare food. The facility maintained the required two-day supply of perishable foods and a seven-day supply of non-perishable foods. Continued on LIC809-C..... Care & Supervision/Administration: Adequate staff were present to supervise clients during the visit. The administrator holds a current administrator’s certificate with expiration date of June 10th, 2026 and a CPR certification with the expiration date of 06-25-26 Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed files for Four(4) staff members, confirming criminal clearances, updated training, and CPR/First Aid certification. Four (4) residents' files were reviewed and contained all required documentation. LPA observed resident files, to be stored in a locked cabinet in the office. The first aid kit was stored in a cabinet in the office. Health-Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: All residents' medications were securely locked in a cabinet and located in the medication room. LPA reviewed medications for six(6) residents, and noticed medications that were not punched out but marked as given to the resident. A citation will be issued Disaster Preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility’s emergency and disaster plan, including documentation of the last fire drill conducted on 11-06-2024, which met department requirements. All facility exits were clear of obstructions. An exit interview was conducted, during which this report was reviewed, and a copy was provided to Emely Rodriguez along with the appeal rightsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 27, 2024
Jul 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Martinez, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to follow up on a report of alleged abuse and neglect. The LPA met with Administrator, Emely Rodriguez, and informed her of the purpose for the visit. The LPA received a report, on 07/18/2024, of alleged verbal abuse by staff toward a resident in care. A report was also received on 07/18/2024 regarding staff members not answering the call system when a resident in care utilizes the pull cord in their bedroom. During the visit the LPA conducted staff and resident interviews, reviewed, and collected copies of relevant documentation. Three staff interviews reported having no knowledge of any staff members yelling at residents in care. Two staff interviews reported staff did have to speak to Resident One (R1) sternly after the resident was observed to be cussing when yelling at Resident Two (R2) on or around 07/17/2024. Staff interviews reported R1 frequently yells at other residents in care and staff intervene to discontinue the behavior. Four resident interviews were conducted; two residents reported staff have been observed to be yelling at residents while the remaining two residents reported they have never observed staff to yell at residents in care. Regarding the call system, one resident interview reported no occasion in which they have had to use the call system, while a second interview reported staff answer the pull cord within or under ten (10) minutes. Administrator Rodriguez was interviewed and reported no knowledge of the above concerns. No information was obtained, at the time of visit, to substantiate either allegation. This report was reviewed with Administrator Rodriguez and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/16/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chinwe Nwogene arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Emely Rodriguez and Relief Manager, Juanita Gaston who were informed of the purpose of visit. LPA toured the facility with Juanita Gaston. The following was observed, reviewed, and inspected: The physical plant, in general, was in good repair. The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). The buildings and grounds were free from hazards. Outdoor and indoor passageways were kept free of obstruction. LPA inspected a sample of resident bedrooms and bathrooms. Resident bedrooms have the required bedding and furniture; such as clean mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting. Room temperatures were comfortable for residents in care. LPA inspected a sample of resident bathrooms; LPA observed bathrooms to be clean and sanitary. There is also a good number of personal toiletries available for the residents in care. LPA measured the hot water temperature in the sampled bathrooms, in which all bathroom sinks measured within regulation. Sampled bathrooms were equipped with non-skid surfaces and grab bars. Bedrooms were equipped with a pull cord system to notify staff of any emergencies. LPA toured the kitchen and dining area. The facility was stocked with a 2-day supply of perishable and 7-day supply of non-perishable food items that were labeled appropriately. The facility had a menu posted and available for review. Dishes, glasses, and utensils were in good condition and stored in a healthful manner. LPA inspected the common areas. Smoke detectors were last tested on 7/25/2023 by Costco. LPA observed several carbon monoxide alarms throughout the facility. Continue on LIC809 Continued from LIC809 There was a locked and centralized storage area for medications, including refrigerated medications. Medications appeared to be dispensed and documented appropriately. The facility had a designated area for resident files and staff files. All staff present have a criminal record clearance in file and are confirmed as being associated with the facility. Random staff and residents' records were reviewed. All required postings were posted near the entryway and throughout the facility. There was adequate seating in the common areas and several activity rooms. LPA observed several activity posters. The facility was also equipped with a complete first aid kit as well as the first aid manual. LPA inspected the outdoor area of the facility. There was shaded area with seating. Overall, the facility was clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Emely Rodriguez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

California Drug Consultants, Inc., licensed since 2001, operates 4 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Rooms come furnished

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceWalking paths · Garden

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasDining room · Indoor Common Areas

    Dining room — reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

    Indoor Common Areas — reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • AmenitiesMove-in coordination

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • All-day or flexible dining

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Food allergy management

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredScheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Activities On-site

    Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights — reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

    Activities On-site — reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Riverside County