Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Golden Angel of La Habra II

Small home·Licensed for 6·La Habra, California

Licensed since 2007Licence #306003764
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedMay 14, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 6, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderAjl Guest HomeSince 2007 · 2 licensed homes

Golden Angel of La Habra II is a small care home in La Habra — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2007. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Golden Angel of La Habra II

Is Golden Angel of La Habra II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Golden Angel of La Habra II licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Golden Angel of La Habra II been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Golden Angel of La Habra II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Golden Angel of La Habra II cost?

$4,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,400–$5,150. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 188 other homes of a similar licensed size across Orange County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 188 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Golden Angel of La Habra II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Ajl Guest Home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Ajl Guest Home — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Providence St. Jude Medical Center is 2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Golden Angel of La Habra II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Golden Angel of La Habra II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GOLDEN ANGEL OF LA HABRA II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #306003764. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Ajl Guest Home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 6, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,200a month to start

Likely $3,400–$5,150

From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,200a month

Likely $3,400–$5,350

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,200likely $3,400–$5,150

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,400–$5,350
$4,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,000–$8,500
$6,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

15 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,250–$6,350.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 15 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1250 Viviwood Place, La Habra, CA 90631Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2007. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 6, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
9
Most recent visit
July 6, 2026
Occupied · May 14, 2026 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated May 14, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2007.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263302025220202411020221102021110

The last 36 months — 6 of 8 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of conducting a Required – 1 Year Inspection. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Lornita S. Panis and discussed the purpose of the inspection. LPA reviewed Infection Control requirements. At about 9:45AM, LPA and AD conducted a tour of the inside and outside of the facility, common areas, resident rooms, kitchen, and garage and observed the following: Structure: facility is a 6-bedroom, 2-bathroom, one-story house with an attached garage that is used for storage. There is a back yard with a patio cover for the residents. LPA observed 2 staff and 4 residents present at the facility in addition to AD. Resident Bedrooms: the 5 resident bedrooms are spacious and will easily accommodate the residents’ furnishings. Furniture for each resident bedroom inspected. Staff Bedrooms: LPA inspected the 1 staff bedroom. Bathrooms: the bathrooms were clean, faucets and toilets were operational. Water temperature: tested between 117 and 118 degrees F in the 2 bathrooms. Linens & Hygiene Supplies: new linens and fully stocked linen closets were observed. Emergency Phone Numbers, Exit Plan & Menu: reviewed. Food Service: LPA observed the facility has a 2-day supply of perishables and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food is available as required by regulations. Carbon Monoxide, Smoke Detectors, Fire Extinguisher: observed and tested. Appliances: stove burners, microwave, washer, and dryer inspected. Knives: observed locked in the kitchen. Toxins: observed locked in the kitchen and garage. Medication cabinet: observed to be locked. First-Aid Kit and Activity Supplies: observed and available. Facility’s licensing fees are not yet paid but are not past due. At about 7:45AM, LPA reviewed 4 resident files and 4 staff files, interviewed 2 residents and 2 staff, and inspected medications for 4 residents. Facility does not handle resident money. During the inspection, LPA and AD observed the following: based on observation and admission, the facility was previously cited for not following their fire clearance as a new wall had been installed in the original bedroom #3 splitting it into new bedrooms #4 and #5, and the facility is continuing to work on obtaining a new occupancy code and fire clearance but the process has not yet been completed; based on documents, S3's health screening does not have a TB test result; and based on documents, S3's first aid training expired on June 22, 2026. Based on the observations made during today’s inspection, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. See LIC809D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was discussed with and provided to facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 6, 2026

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 6. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jun 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

This unannounced Case Management – Other inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering amended findings for Complaint Control No. 22-AS-20260506155811. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Lornita S. Panis and explained the reason for today’s inspection. During the inspection, LPA and AD reviewed and discussed the previously delivered findings and the amended findings and LPA delivered the amended reports to AD. An exit interview was conducted and copies of this report and the amended reports were discussed with and provided to facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 25, 2026
May 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff is rough with resident's in care resulting in bruising

This is an amended report This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Lornita S. Panis and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that facility staff is rough with resident's in care resulting in bruising revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, staff, and residents, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and a photograph of Resident #1 (R1). Unsubstantiated It was alleged that a staff was rough with a resident resulting in bruising. LPA inspected the facility, conducted health and safety checks on residents, and observed no health and safety issues. LPA interviewed the four other residents and did not obtain information corroborating the allegation. LPA interviewed AD and three staff who denied the allegation. LPA reviewed a photograph of R1 which does show a small, superficial, finger-sized bruise on R1’s leg allegedly caused by rough handling by Staff #1 (S1) and noted that by the time of today’s inspection, the bruise had resolved, indicating that it was indeed a bruise and not a permanent mark. However, S1 denied causing the bruise and the information obtained did not confirm the cause of the bruise. Based on the information gathered during the investigation and review of all documents obtained, the Department is unable to ascertain if the above allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was discussed with and provided to facility representative. This is an amended report It was alleged that staff do not respond to a resident’s calls for assistance timely at night. LPA inspected the facility, conducted health and safety checks on residents, and observed no health and safety issues. LPA interviewed the four other residents and did not obtain information corroborating the allegation. LPA interviewed AD and three staff who denied the allegation, stating that while staff sleep at night, they wake up and provide care when they hear residents’ request assistance, and in response to a resident needing additional night care, an additional staff was added to address that resident’s needs at night. It was alleged that staff leave a resident in soiled diapers for extended periods of time. LPA interviewed the four other residents and did not obtain information corroborating the allegation. LPA interviewed AD and three staff who denied the allegation. Based on the information gathered during the investigation and review of all documents obtained, the Department is unable to ascertain if the above allegations occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violations occurred; therefore, these allegation are deemed Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was discussed with and provided to facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260506155811

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 000000 · Plan of correction due date: May 15, 2026

This is an amended report. This citation page was created in error.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2026

Plan of correction: This is an amended report. This citation page was created in error.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

This unannounced Case Management – Deficiencies inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of issuing citations for deficiencies observed during the investigation into Complaint Control No. 22-AS-20250905161130. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Lornita S. Panis and explained the reason for today’s inspection. During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, conducted health and safety checks on residents, interviewed AD and staff, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster and staff roster. Per AD, on August 27, 2025, Resident #1 (R1) was noted to have severe swelling on their neck, R1 was taken to the hospital, and R1 was hospitalized. However, based on incident reports received at the Orange County Regional Office (OCRO) and AD’s admission, R1’s medical emergency and hospitalization on August 27, 2025, was not reported as required. Based on the observations made during today’s inspection, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. See LIC809D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was discussed with and provided to facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 23, 2025

87211 Reporting Requirements (a) … (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency … within seven days of the occurrence of … (B) Any serious injury… This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on documents and admission, the licensee did not ensure R1’s medical emergency and hospitalization on August 27, 2025, was reported to licensing, which poses a potential safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee stated that they will review Section 87211 Reporting Requirements and submit a statement of understanding to LPA by POC due date.

Jul 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of conducting a Required – 1 Year Inspection. LPA met with Staff #1 (S1) Lizette Magbitang and discussed the purpose of the inspection. Administrator (AD) Lornita S. Panis was not present during the inspection. LPA reviewed Infection Control requirements. At about 1:45PM, LPA and S1 conducted a tour of the inside and outside of the facility, common areas, resident rooms, kitchen, and garage and observed the following: Structure: facility is a 6-bedroom, 2-bathroom, one-story house with an attached garage that is used for storage. There is a back yard with a patio cover for the residents. LPA observed 3 staff and 6 residents present at the facility. Resident Bedrooms: the 5 resident bedrooms are spacious and will easily accommodate the residents’ furnishings. Furniture for each resident bedroom inspected. Staff Bedrooms: LPA inspected the 1 staff bedroom. Bathrooms: the bathrooms were clean, faucets and toilets were operational. Water temperature: tested between 108 and 118 degrees F in the 2 bathrooms. Linens & Hygiene Supplies: new linens and fully stocked linen closets were observed. Emergency Phone Numbers, Exit Plan & Menu: reviewed. Food Service: LPA observed the facility has a 2-day supply of perishables and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food is available as required by regulations. Carbon Monoxide, Smoke Detectors, Fire Extinguisher: observed and tested. Appliances: stove burners, microwave, washer, and dryer inspected. Knives: observed locked in the kitchen. Toxins: observed locked in the garage. Medication cabinet: observed to be locked. First-Aid Kit and Activity Supplies: observed and available. Facility’s licensing fees are paid. At about 2:45PM, LPA reviewed 6 resident files and 4 staff files, interviewed 2 residents and 2 staff, and inspected medications for 6 residents. Facility does not handle resident money. During the inspection, LPA and S1 observed the following: based on observation, the licensee is not following their fire clearance as a new wall has been installed in the recreation room creating a new bedroom #3 and a new wall has been installed in the original bedroom #3 splitting it into new bedrooms #4 and #5; based on observation and documents, the licensee did not ensure S1, S2, and S3, who LPA confirmed are background cleared, were associated to the facility. Based on the observations made during today’s inspection, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. See LIC809D. Immediate civil penalties are being assessed. See LIC421IM. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was discussed with and provided to facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christian Gutierrez conducted an unannounced annual inspection using the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools. LPA was met by Caregiver Cora Dominguez at approximately 8:00 AM and explained reason for visit. Administrator Lornita Panis arrived shortly. Facility is licensed to serve residents over 60 years old six (6) can be non-ambulatory. Hospice waiver approved for six (6). The facility is in a residential area, and it is a one-story family home. A tour of the single-story facility included the living room, kitchen, 4 client bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, laundry area, front yard, backyard, attached garage, and staff room. LPA toured the facility and observed the following: Each resident’s bedroom has the required furniture and bedding. There is extra clean linen and towels in hallway closet. Smoke / carbon monoxide detectors were observed in each room and throughout the facility and are properly operating. The facility has one (1) fully charged fire extinguishers which is kept in laundry room. Cleaning supplies and toxic substances are inaccessible locked in cupboards in kitchen. Freezers are maintained at a temperature of 0-degree F and the refrigerators at a maximum of 40 degrees F. Sufficient supply of 2 days perishable & 7 days non-perishable foods was observed in the kitchen. There are no firearms or weapons stored at the facility. The hot water temperature in the bathrooms were measured between the required range of 105-120 degrees F. The facility does not have a swimming pool or bodies of water on the premises There is a shaded seating area for the residents located in the backyard. Passageways and exits are free of obstruction. Garage has an extra refrigerator with more food. SEE LIC 809C Four (4) staff files were reviewed and included Criminal clearance record, CPR/training, and health screening with TB. Four (4) resident files were reviewed and included physicians report, TB clearance, and all necessary documents. Last fire/earthquake drill was conducted in December of 2024. Infectious control plan was reviewed. Two (2) staff and (1) resident was interviewed. Four (4) resident medications were reviewed. Medications are centrally stored and locked MAR log is used. No deficiency was observed during today’s visit. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator Panis and a copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Ajl Guest Home, licensed since 2007, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Orange County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Orange County