Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Femms Residential Homes I

Small home·Licensed for 6·Granada Hills, California

Licensed since 2007Licence #197606973
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,400 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,600–$5,450
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 8, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 8, 2026CDSS inspection record

Femms Residential Homes I is a small care home in Granada Hills — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2007. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Femms Residential Homes I

Is Femms Residential Homes I licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Femms Residential Homes I licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Femms Residential Homes I been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Femms Residential Homes I still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Femms Residential Homes I cost?

$4,400 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,600–$5,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Femms Residential Homes I take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Fructuosa M. Morales, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Providence Holy Cross Medical Center is 2.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Femms Residential Homes I keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 1 resident, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Femms Residential Homes I license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “FEMMS RESIDENTIAL HOMES I”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197606973. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Fructuosa M. Morales, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 8, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 1 resident
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM# 3 OR 6. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 1.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 1 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,400a month to start

Likely $3,600–$5,450

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,400a month

Likely $3,600–$5,650

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,400likely $3,600–$5,450

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,600–$5,650
$4,400
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,200–$8,750
$6,400
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

10 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$6,400.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 11811 Paso Robles Street, Granada Hills, CA 91344Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2007. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 8, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2022
State visits
8
Most recent visit
July 8, 2026
Occupied at that visit
4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 7, 2024 to July 8, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2007.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263302025110202422020231102022110

The last 36 months — 7 of 8 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not accept resident back after hospital discharge

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Flory Morales and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 8:55 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:10 AM, reviewed records between 9:30 AM to 10:30 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:30 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Facility staff did not accept resident back after hospital discharge. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was abandoned at the hospital by facility staff. LPA's record review today between 9:30 AM to 10:30 AM, revealed that R1 was brought to the hospital on 01/03/26 due to a disruptive mental health condition. R1 was supposed to be discharged by the hospital but staff was concerned about R1's mental health condition that needed to be addressed before going back to the facility, secondary is that R1 was a client of Enriched Residential Care (ERC) program of Los Angeles County and having prolonged stay at the hospital automatically disenrolled R1 to the program. Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Further review also revealed that R1 was accepted back at the facility upon discharged on 01/30/26 from the hospital. LPA's interview with the Administrator revealed that the Administrator was in constant communication with the ERC and hospital staff during the entire hospitalization and worked with R1, hospital, and ERC social worker for the safe return of R1 to the facility. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260129102142
Jun 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a Case Management (CM) visit to the facility to follow up on an Incident/Death Report submitted to the Licensing Agency on 05/30/28. LPA met with staff, Edwardo Morales, and advised him of the visit. Administrator was unavailable at this time of the visit. Today's CM consisted of interviews with staff, a physical plant inspection, and record review. Although this follow up will be submitted to LPM for review, Based on the LPA’s observations, interviews, and record review(s), there doesn't appear to be neglect in regards to this incident as the resident is ambulatory, able to make decision on their own, and does not require any supervision when leaving the facility. Staff is advised and a copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2026
May 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with the administrator, Neil Morales and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 12:00pm, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. The facility is a one story building that houses clients age 60 and above. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are hardwired and interconnected. The carbon monoxide detector is located by room #4. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased on February 10, 2026. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food sealed and properly stored. There were no knives or cleaning supplies out and accessible during the day's visit. Bedrooms: There were seven (7) bedrooms. Six (6) rooms designated for residents' use. All six rooms are private. One (1) bedroom is designated for staff use. Resident bedrooms were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are three (3) bathrooms. Two (2) are designated for residents' use, and one (1) for staff. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured between 110 to 111 degrees Fahrenheit. No cleaning supplies were observed stored in any of the resident bathrooms. Common Areas: These included the living room, family room and dining area. All furniture were maintained in good repair. Floors were mopped and clean. Passageways/hallways were clear of obstruction. There is a fireplace that is blocked and no tools were present. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. OFFICE/STAFF WORKSTATION: Staff workstation is located at the corner in the family room, by the back exit. Resident and staff files are maintained in a locked filing cabinet there. Laundry area: The laundry area is located adjacent to the kitchen. Toxins and detergents not present at this time. Garage: The garage is attached to the building. The only entry to the garage is through the side of the home. The garage has a freezer and a refrigerator. The garage is used as storage for extra perishable and non-perishable food. Entry to the garage is kept locked and inaccessible to the residents Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There is a patio in the backyard with furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The backyard has sufficient space to hold outdoor activities. There are two storage buildings in the back that stores extra beds and furniture. Both storage building were locked during the day's visit. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medications are stored in a locked cabinet in the kitchen. Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper storage and documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
May 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with the administrator, Neil Morales and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 12:00pm, with the assistance of the administrator, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. The facility is a one story building that houses clients age 60 and above. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are hardwired and interconnected. The carbon monoxide detector is located by room #4. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased on January 23, 2025. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food sealed and properly stored. There were no knives or cleaning supplies out and accessible during the day's visit. Bedrooms: There were seven (7) bedrooms. Six (6) rooms designated for residents' use. All six rooms are private. One (1) bedroom is designated for staff use. Resident bedrooms were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are three (3) bathrooms. Two (2) are designated for residents' use, and one (1) for staff. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured at 115 degrees Fahrenheit. No cleaning supplies were observed stored in any of the resident bathrooms. Common Areas: These included the living room, family room and dining area. All furniture were maintained in good repair. Floors were mopped and clean. Passageways/hallways were clear of obstruction. There is a fireplace that is blocked and no tools were present. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. OFFICE/STAFF WORKSTATION: Staff workstation is located at the corner in the family room, by the back exit. Resident and staff files are maintained in a locked filing cabinet there. Laundry area: The laundry area is located adjacent to the kitchen. Toxins and detergents not present at this time. Garage: The garage is attached to the building. The only entry to the garage is through the side of the home. The garage has a freezer and a refrigerator. The garage is used as storage for extra perishable and non-perishable food. Entry to the garage is kept locked and inaccessible to the residents Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There is a patio in the backyard with furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The backyard has sufficient space to hold outdoor activities. There are two storage buildings in the back that stores extra beds and furniture. Both storage building were locked during the day's visit. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medications are stored in a locked cabinet in the kitchen. Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper storage and documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident in care sustained multiple unexplained injuries while in care Staff hit resident in care Staff did not seek timely medical help for resident in care Staff stole resident's personal belongings Staff spoke inappropriately to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent visit to the facility to conclude the investigation regarding the above allegations. The initial visit was made by LPA Cava on 05/06/24. LPA met with staf Eduardo Morales, and advised them of the complaint. LPA’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents and staff, record review, and a physical plant inspection to insure the health and safety of the residents in care. Resident in care sustained multiple unexplained injuries while in care/Staff hit resident in care: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that Resident 1 (R1) has scratches to the knee and bruises under the eye. The reporting party is not sure if these wounds were due to a fall, or abuse by facility staff, as it was also reported that staff slapped R1 in the face. Furthermore, the reporting party stated R1 was alleging that these injuries occurred while they were living at a board and care called Alverado Care Home, located off of Alverado Street, in Los Angeles. No witnesses were identified to this allegation. Unsubstantiated Moreover, no staff name was given or identified to these allegations. Interview made with the administrator reveal that R1 lost their balance and fell when coming out of the hallway bathroom at approximately 08:10am on 05/01/24. Staff 1 (S1) was present, and they stated they were waiting for R1 outside of the bathroom so that they can assist R1 when R1 gets done. As R1 was exiting the bathroom, R1 just lost their balance and fell. Paramedics were called immediately, and R1 was taken to the hospital to treat R1’s injury to their hip. An Incident Report (IR) was submitted, and Licensing notified. R1 was currently at the hospital at the time of the investigation. They will be discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) for rehabilitation for the hip at discharge. Interviews with five (5) of five residents made. All five could not corroborate with the allegations made. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove that R1 sustained multiple injuries while in care, or staff hit R1. Therefore, the allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff did not seek timely medical help for resident in care/Staff spoke inappropriately to resident in care: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that R1 had a fall in the morning of, on or around 05/02/24, and was left unnoticed by staff. R1 was unable to get up. When R1 called for help, staff was verbally abusive towards R1, insisting that R1 could get up on their own. Eventually emergency services were contacted and paramedics came to take R1 to the hospital. No witnesses or staff name given or identified to these allegations. Interview made with the administrator acknowledged that R1 lost their balance and fell when coming out of the hallway bathroom at approximately 08:10am on 05/01/24. (S1) was present, and they stated they were waiting for R1 outside of the bathroom so that they can assist R1 when R1 gets done. As R1 was exiting the bathroom, R1 lost their balance and fell. S1 deny the allegation of not seeking timely medical attention as paramedics were called immediately, and R1 was taken to the hospital to treat R1’s injury. An Incident Report (IR) was submitted on 05/02/24, and Licensing notified. R1 was currently at the hospital at the time of the investigation. They will be discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) for rehabilitation for the hip at discharge. Interviews with five of five residents were made. All five have no complaints regarding staff services, as staff is able to meet their needs. Moreover, all five residents stated the administrator and staff are never verbally abusive towards them or their peers. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove that staff did not seek timely medical help for R1, or that staff spoke inappropriately to R1. Therefore, the allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff stole resident's personal belongings: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that R1 is financially abused by a facility staff. It was also reported that staff has been stealing their clothes. Staff name was not given or identified. According to the reporting party, R1 was alleging this occurred while they were living at a board and care called Alverado Care Home, located off of Alverado Street, in Los Angeles. Interviews made with the administrator and staff deny the allegation, stating R1 has never reported anything missing to them. R1 completed the LIC 621 (Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables) and everything in R1’s room is accounted for. Moreover, the administrator stated they do not handle resident cash resources. Interviews with five of five residents also deny the allegation. All five residents stated they have never had to report anything missing or stolen during their stay in the facility. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation that staff stole R1 belongings. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 7, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240502131856
May 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with the administrator, Neil Morales and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 12:15pm, with the assistance of the administrator, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. The facility is a one story building that houses clients age 60 and above. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are hardwired and interconnected. The carbon monoxide detector is located by room #4. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased on 10/10/23. The fire drill was last conducted on February 13, 2024. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food sealed and properly stored. There were no knives or cleaning supplies out and accessible during the day's visit. Bedrooms: There were seven (7) bedrooms. Six (6) rooms designated for residents' use. All six rooms are private. One (1) bedroom is designated for staff use. Resident bedrooms were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are three (3) bathrooms. Two (2) are designated for residents' use, and one (1) for staff. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured at 111.6 degrees Fahrenheit. No cleaning supplies were observed stored in any of the resident bathrooms. Common Areas: These included the living room, family room and dining area. The living room has a couch, two chairs and television. There is a fireplace that is blocked and no tools were present. The family room has a couch and television. The dining room has a table to accommodate six (6). All furniture in common areas were in good repair. The floors were mopped and clean. Hallways/passageways are clear of obstruction. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. OFFICE/STAFF WORKSTATION: Staff workstation is located at the corner in the family room, by the back exit. Resident and staff files are maintained in a locked filing cabinet there. Laundry area: The laundry area is located adjacent to the kitchen. Toxins and detergents not present at this time. Garage: The garage is attached to the building. The only entry to the garage is through the side of the home. The garage has a freezer and a refrigerator. The garage is used as storage for extra perishable and non-perishable food. Entry to the garage is kept locked and inaccessible to the residents Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There is a patio in the backyard with furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The backyard has sufficient space to hold outdoor activities. There are two storage buildings in the back that stores extra beds and furniture. Both storage building were locked during the day's visit. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medications are stored in a locked cabinet in the kitchen. Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper storage and documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with the administrator, Neil Morales and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 1:01pm, with the assistance of the administrator, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are hardwired and interconnected. There are carbon monoxide detectors that functions properly. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased on 10/10/23. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Properly labeled medications were locked in one of the kitchen cabinets. Bedrooms: There were seven (7) bedrooms. Six (6) rooms designated for residents' use. All six rooms are private. One (1) bedroom is designated for staff use. Resident bedrooms were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are three (3) bathrooms. Two (2) are designated for residents' use, and one (1) for staff. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured at 110.4 degrees Fahrenheit. No cleaning supplies were observed stored in resident bathrooms. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The common areas were properly furnished. There are two living rooms. The dining area has a large dining room table to accommodate six (6). The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. OFFICE/STAFF WORKSTATION: Staff workstation is located by one of the living rooms. Resident and personnel files are maintained in a locked filing cabinet there. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The laundry area and detergents are located by the kitchen. Detergents and cleaning supplies stored separate and away from the non-perishable food. Detergents and cleaning supplies were locked in a cabinet. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medication and Medication Records were review for proper documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County