Mid-size home · Licensed for 32 · Olivehurst

Feather River Manor

3962 West Ella Ave., Olivehurst, CA 95961Licensed since 1982

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,000 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,150–$5,300 See costs

No openings reported

Approved by the state: WheelchairState licensing record · October 26, 2026
Licensed for 32: a mid-size care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days

AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

Wheelchairup to 4 residents

Not on file: dementia, hospice and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording

AMBULATORY/4 NONAMBULATORY, AGES 60 YEARS AND OVER.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

Diabetes care
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

As needs change

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Feather River Manor: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines, staying through hospice and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,000a month to start

Likely $3,150–$5,300

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,000likely a month

Room

Daily care

Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

Starting monthly rate$4,000likely $3,150–$5,300
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,150–$5,450: $4,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,850–$8,600: $6,500

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance

MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.

If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers

Rates at nearby homes10 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $8,000

10 homes like this within 25 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,050–$8,000.

Comfort Care Elderly HomeOlivehurst · 2.3 mi · Small home
$5,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
The GardensYuba City · 6.1 mi · Mid-size home
$8,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Floradale VillaLincoln · 18 mi · Small home
$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
Happy Life VillaLincoln · 19 mi · Small home
$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
Ferrari RCFELincoln · 21 mi · Small home
$4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
Nadia's Care HomeLincoln · 23 mi · Small home
$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Diamond Wood Senior CareRoseville · 23 mi · Small home
$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Wood Creek Senior CareRoseville · 24 mi · Small home
$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
Bridgeway Senior CareRoseville · 25 mi · Small home
$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
Oasis for Seniors at Heaven's GardenRocklin · 25 mi · Small home
$3,600Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026

How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.

Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask

The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Search the home’s details

Rooms & the spaces they will use (2)Room types · Common areas

Room typesStudio
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Common areasIndoor Common Areas
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (1)Meals provided

Meals provided
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day (2)Activity types offered · Religious services off site

Activity types offeredActivities On-site
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Religious services off site
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

Where it is

3962 West Ella Ave., Olivehurst, CA 95961Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

Sutter Surgical Hospital - North ValleyHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list4.6 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #581302894 · See the state’s own record

The last 36 months — 5 of 12 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated” and 1 “Unfounded”.

20262 state visits · 2 documents

Sep 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

LPA Hiratsuka visited the facility to complete the annual inspection visit. LPA met with Administrator Scott Terry. LPA toured the facility including common areas, kitchen, storage, medication storage areas, food storage areas, storage for cleaners, hallways, bathrooms, resident rooms. The facility consists of a main house, and two additional buildings that house resident bedrooms. There is also a separate building for laundry. The facility is clean and nicely kept with needed repairs/painting being performed on a regular basis. Bedrooms are appropriately furnished and cleaned. Bathrooms are clean and plumbing is functioning. Grab bars, etc. installed. Smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors installed and functioning. There is a sprinkler system installed in the facility. Fire extinguishers are charged and checked regularly. Rooms have call buttons available to residents if needed. Food supplies appear plentiful and varied, of good quality. Supplies meet requirement for 2 days perishable and 7 days non-perishable. Food appears to be stored appropriately. LPA observed several physical plant projects going on today. The roof is almost done, the kitchen is being remolded. None of the remodeling has interfered with resident care. At this time, LPA finds the facility to be in substantial compliance. No deficiencies were cited at this visit. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2026

Apr 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee didn't report relationship to responsible party

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hiratsuka, conducted the investigation into the allegation above. The allegation had to do with an alleged inappropriate relationship between a staff and a resident which LPA went unfounded on the allegation. LPA interviewed staff and residents. The Administrator made a comment to someone that appeared they might have thought something but didn't look into it. LPA spoke to Administrator who stated they deny the relationship occurred. LPA cannot prove or disprove the administrator didn't know about the alleged allegation to report it. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260406162132

20251 state visit · 1 document

Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced annual visit. LPA toured with House Manager Jessica Burwell. This facility has three buildings for residents. The main building has ten rooms that are shared, the main common areas, food storage, kitchen, and dining areas. A second building in the back has three client rooms that are shared and two private rooms, and the third building for residents has two resident rooms which are shared. In the main building some resident rooms have private full bathrooms, several common full bathrooms, locked cabinets and closets for records, cleaning chemicals, and medications. The other buildings have full bathrooms for the residents. There is a separate building for laundry. Resident and staff records were reviewed. A couple of topics were discussed. No deficiencies cited. Due to LPA's printer not working, LPA is going to email a copy of this report to Administrator Scott Terrythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025

20242 state visits · 2 documents

Aug 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 8/8/2024 LPA Tryon visited the facility to complete the annual inspection visit. LPA met with Administrator Scott Terry. The facility currently has 31 residents. LPA toured the facility including common areas, kitchen, storage, medication storage areas, food storage areas, storage for cleaners, hallways, bathrooms, resident rooms. The facility consists of a main house, and two additional buildings that house resident bedrooms. There is also a separate building for laundry. The facility is clean and nicely kept with needed repairs/painting being performed on a regular basis. Bedrooms are appropriately furnished and cleaned. Bathrooms are clean and plumbing is functioning. Grab bars, etc. installed. Smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors installed and functioning. There is a sprinkler system installed in the facility. Fire extinguishers are charged and checked regularly. Rooms have call buttons available to residents if needed. Food supplies appear plentiful and varied, of good quality. Supplies meet requirement for 2 days perishable and 7 days non-perishable. Food appears to be stored appropriately. The facility has adequate supply of cleaning and other supplies, as well as PPE. Medications are centrally stored, locked and logged. Medications are stored in original containers. LPA reviewed 4 resident files and 4 staff files. Files include appropriate documents. Staff receives regular training, are first aid certified. Admin. Certificate is current; liability insurance current. At this time, LPA finds the facility to be in substantial compliance. No deficiencies were cited at this visit. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2024

May 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring the facility is mold free Staff did not ensure the roof was fixed timely

On 5/1/2024 LPA Tryon arrived at the facility to complete the complaint. LPA met with Licensee/ Administrator B. Scott Terry. LPA has spoken with staff and inspected the facility. Regarding the allegation that the staff are not ensuring the facility is mold free, LPA inspected the house and found no mold anywhere in the building. There had been some mold around a bathroom window, but it has been cleaned up and resident encouraged to open the window while the shower is going to vent the steam. So, there was some mold, but it was cleaned up right away when licensee became aware. Allegation is UNFOUNDED. Regarding the allegation that staff did not fix the roof in timely: LPA interviewed licensee/administrator and inspected building inside. It was learned that there never WAS a roof leak; the leak that happened in one bathroom was caused by a broken shower pipe in the wall. When it was learned that there was a leak, the licensee immediately fixed the leak, repaired walls, etc. Clothes and items were cleaned. LPA finds no current evidence of a leak. So, although there was a leak, as soon as licensee became aware he fixed and cleaned everything. Allegation is unfounded. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240223081746

Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 7 documents

20231 state visit · 1 document

Sep 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced annual visit. LPA toured with Caregiver Tina Daughter, and House Manager Jessica Burwell the visit with LPA. This facility has three buildings for residents. The main building has ten rooms that are shared, the main common areas, food storage, kitchen, and dining areas. A second building in the back has three client rooms that are shared and two private rooms, and the third building for residents has two resident rooms which are shared. In the main building some resident rooms have private full bathrooms, several common full bathrooms, locked cabinets and closets for records, cleaning chemicals, and medications. The other buildings have full bathrooms for the residents. There is a separate building for laundry. Resident and staff records were reviewed. A couple of topics were discussed. The following shall be updated and submitted to Community Care Licensing by 10/15/2023: -LIC 500 facility personnel or staff schedule -LIC 610 emergency disaster plan -LIC 308 designation of administrative responsibility No deficiencies cited.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023

20224 state visits · 4 documents

Nov 1, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced annual continuation visit. LPA wore a surgical mask. LPA observed staff wearing masks. LPA toured the facility with Administrator Scott Terry. LPA reviewed staff and resident files during this visit. LPA and Administrator also discussed several topics. No deficiencies cited.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 1, 2022

Oct 19, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced visit. LPA wore the surgical mask during this visit. The purpose of this visit was to go over the documents that are required for resident files and staff files. This was a continuation from the first annual inspection last week. Administrator Scott Terry was unavailable this morning to review the files with LPA. LPA did leave behind some documents that are required for staff and resident files with Caregiver. LPA shall return at a later date. No deficiencies cited during this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2022

Oct 11, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced annual visit. LPA wore a surgical mask. LPA observed staff wearing masks. LPA toured the facility with Administrator Scott Terry. LPA toured the physical plant portion. Due to time constraints LPA is going to return to complete the visit. A couple of topics were discussed during this visit. No deficiencies cited.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 11, 2022

Jan 26, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - COVID-19Report on file

Type of visit: Case Management - COVID-19

On 1/26/22 around 1:00 pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mai Thao conducted a case management visit with Licensee, Scott Terry, to provide additional infection control guidance to help control the spread COVID. Also joining the visit was Shantala Ahanya, Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) Program Center for Health Care Quality California Department of Public Health (CDPH). Prior to visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 Mask, Face Shield, Gloves, and Gown. The purpose of the visit is to evaluate the facility to ensure infection control measures are followed. During the inspection screening process for staff and visitors was observed and PPE was evaluated. Licensee also toured the front entrance bathroom to ensure hand washing is available. During this inspection the Department and facility representatives discussed the cohorting of staff and positive residents, positive residents continuing to isolate with non-positive residents, face shield/eye protection for staff, hand hygiene for residents before and after smoking and eating. LPA, Shantala Ahanya, and Licensee toured the facility, but not limited to, Entrance, Entrance Area, Bathroom, Resident Bedroom, and Common Area. (Continue 809-C.....) Recommendations discussed: · Screening of residents with COVID and under observation · Training of staff, donning and doffing · cohorting COVID and Non-COVID residents · increased air circulation inside the facility · encouraged mask wearing for residents · encouraging staff/Residents to wear N95/KN95 · plan on mitigating residents who goes out of the facility The Licensee agreed to do the following: · have screening protocol in place · have the proper PPE available for staff · have an isolation room and bathroom available for cohorting COVID positive residents · open windows for air circulation and purchase portable air purifier (HEFA Filtered) · encourage residents to wear mask indoor, as tolerable · encourage staff to wear N95 mask/KN95 · encourage positive resident to wear N95 mask when out of their room (KN95 is okay) Licensee agreed to implement these mitigation practices at the facility. The Department will continue to provide assistance with daily calls with the facility until it has been cleared by local public health. Facility will continue to provide the department daily line list until cleared by the public health. LPA advised Licensee to screen ALL visitors and staff prior to entry to the facility. LPA also advised Licensee to report all positive COVID-19 cases to Licensing, Public Health, and other reporting parties as soon as facility find out. Exit Interview Conducted and a copy of this report was left with Licensee, Scott Terry, at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 26, 2022

20212 state visits · 2 documents

Dec 23, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to keep the facility free from pests – UNSUBSTANTIATED

/23/2021 11:00 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the results of a complaint investigation. LPA met with licensee / administrator Scott Terry and explained the purpose of the visit was to deliver complaint investigation results for the above allegation. Prior to initiating the complaint investigation LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 mask, gloves. During the course of the investigation LPA interviewed 1 administrator, 2 staff, and 2 clients. LPA attempted to interview an additional 4 staff however, these staff persons did not return LPA’s telephone calls. LPA reviewed the following documents: Staff list with telephone numbers, invoice for pest control supplies, invoice for new mattresses and box springs, roster of facility clients/residents. Continued on LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiated Staff failed to keep the facility free from pests – UNSUBSTANTIATED It was alleged that Staff failed to keep the facility free from pests. The licensee stated the last time the facility had a bed bug infestation was a few months ago. The licensee stated they treat the facility once a month for bedbugs, have placed mattress covers on all of the beds, and replaced the two beds in the room where the last bed bug outbreak occurred. During client interviews C1 stated the last time they saw bed bugs in the facility was a few months ago. C2 stated they had never seen bed bugs in the facility. During staff interviews S1 stated the facility first had bed bugs in 2018 but thought the licensee got rid of them. S4 stated they never saw any bed bugs. S1 stated the licensee changed the mattresses and bought new bedding and beds. S1 stated the licensee sprays for bed bugs and noted that they even took the base boards off to get rid of them. During LPA’s tour of the facility C1 stated they had a bed bug on their arm the previous night. LPA Knight then observed the licensee remove C1’s bedspread and inspect for bedbugs, none were found. The licensee then removed the sheets and inspected the bedbug cover. No bed bugs were found. LPA Knight was present during the inspection and did not observe any bed bugs. Document review included a receipt from a home improvement store that included 2 gallons of bed bug spray which were purchased on 9/08/2021. A receipt from a local home furnishings store showed the purchase of 2 twin size mattress and box spring sets were purchased for the facility on 07/03/2021. These purchases are consistent with the administrator’s statement of fogging and spraying the facility for bed bugs and purchasing new mattresses for the afflicted client room. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was emailed to facility licensee /administrator Scott Terry. No deficiencies were cited on today’s date.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2021 · control 25-AS-20210903154708

Oct 22, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

10/22/2021 9:00 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dawn Keane arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met with Administrator Benjamine Scott Terry and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA contacted Administrator and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured hand sanitizer was applied before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95. Additionally, LPA Keane was screened by Administrator/Staff person. LPA Keane and AD toured facility to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, three (3) bathrooms, four (4) bedrooms, isolation rooms, kitchen and storage areas. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA Keane and the AD completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was to AD.giventhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2021

31 of 32 beds were occupied at the April 14, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Terry, Nora and Scott, licensed since 1982.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 1982, as the state’s facility page counts them

State visits on file: 13
Total complaints: 3
Substantiated allegations: 0
Type A citations: 0
Type B citations: 0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 1982, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size

	This home	Typical
Type A citations	0	0
Type B citations	0	1
Substantiated allegations	0	2
Total complaints	3	6

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean

Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record error Operate this home? Respond or correct, free →

Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Feather River Manor

Is Feather River Manor licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Feather River Manor licensed for?

32 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Feather River Manor been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 1982, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.

Is Feather River Manor still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.

What does Feather River Manor cost?

$4,000 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,150–$5,300. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Feather River Manor take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Terry, Nora and Scott, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sutter Surgical Hospital - North Valley is 4.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Feather River Manor keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”