Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Everest at Walnut Valley Senior Living
Large community·Licensed for 120·Walnut, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,450 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,650
- Home sizeLicensed for 120Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit81 of 120 beds occupiedJune 16, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitJune 16, 2026CDSS inspection record
Everest at Walnut Valley Senior Living is a large care community in Walnut — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 120 residents since 2021.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Everest at Walnut Valley Senior Living
Is Everest at Walnut Valley Senior Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Everest at Walnut Valley Senior Living licensed for?
120 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Everest at Walnut Valley Senior Living been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.
Is Everest at Walnut Valley Senior Living still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Everest at Walnut Valley Senior Living cost?
$4,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,650. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 121 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,094 to $5,961 a month, and the middle figure is $4,195 (n = 121 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Everest at Walnut Valley Senior Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Walnut Acquisition LLC; Walnut Silver Town, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kindred Hospital Brea is 3.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Everest at Walnut Valley Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 20 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Everest at Walnut Valley Senior Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “EVEREST AT WALNUT VALLEY SENIOR LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #198603444. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 120 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Walnut Acquisition LLC; Walnut Silver Town, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 11 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 16, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 120 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 20 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 10 residents
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER.120 NON-AMBULATORY,OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.ROOMS 129-145 & ALL 1ST FLOOR ROOMS APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN EXCEPT FOR ROOMS 101,103,105,107,109,111. 3 EXTERIOR GATES APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS.HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.NEW MGMT WALNUT SILVER TOWN EFF 10/15/25.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 20 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,450a month to start
Likely $3,450–$5,650
From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,450a month
Likely $3,450–$5,800
With a studio and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$4,450likely $3,450–$5,650
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,800
- $4,450
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,200–$8,900
- $6,450
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
24 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,900–$5,650.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Brookdale BreaBrea · 4.2 mi · Large community$4,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Silverado BreaBrea · 4.6 mi · Large community$11,000Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Cogir of BreaBrea · 5.1 mi · Large community$4,495Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- CaprianaBrea · 5.6 mi · Large community$4,695Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Whitten Heights Assisted Living and Memory CareLa Habra · 5.7 mi · Large community$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Regency Grand at West CovinaWest Covina · 5.8 mi · Large community$3,325Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Park View PlaceCovina · 5.8 mi · Large community$3,995Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- The Terraces at Via Verde-A Memory Care CommunitySan Dimas · 6.4 mi · Large community$4,950Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Merrill Gardens at West CovinaWest Covina · 6.9 mi · Large community$3,100Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Bayshire San DimasSan Dimas · 7.0 mi · Large community$2,700Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at BradfordPlacentia · 7.1 mi · Large community$4,395Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Whittier Glen Assisted LivingWhittier · 7.2 mi · Large community$1,550Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Atria CovinaCovina · 7.4 mi · Large community$3,845Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunrise at Yorba LindaYorba Linda · 7.4 mi · Large community$7,144Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunnycrest Senior LivingFullerton · 7.5 mi · Large community$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakmont of FullertonFullerton · 7.5 mi · Large community$5,295Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- West Park Senior LivingSan Dimas · 7.6 mi · Large community$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakmont of Chino HillsChino Hills · 7.8 mi · Large community$5,895Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Cambridge CourtFullerton · 8.3 mi · Large community$3,000Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Terrace at FullertonFullerton · 8.3 mi · Large community$3,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Palms Retirement CenterFullerton · 8.9 mi · Large community$2,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Clearwater at GlendoraGlendora · 9.0 mi · Large community$5,700Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakmont of WhittierWhittier · 9.3 mi · Large community$4,095Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Brookdale Central WhittierWhittier · 9.5 mi · Large community$2,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 19850 E Colima Road, Walnut, CA 91789Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2021. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 16, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 11
- Most recent visit
- June 16, 2026
- Occupied at that visit
- 81 of 120 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 6, 2025 to June 16, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (5). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 1
- Substantiated allegations0typical 2
- Total complaints4typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 9 of 12 documents
Jun 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident is allowed to be readmitted to the facility.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted an unannounced complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Donghyun Moon, administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained a copy of the staff & resident rosters, SNF Admission record, Walnut Police report (SEAR 06/09/2026), Resident #1 (R1) files such as Identification and Emergency Information (Face sheet), Admission agreement, Pre admission appraisal, Medical Assessment, Appraisals Needs and services plan, Medication administration record (MAR) for May 2026 and Physician's reassessment letter (06/09/2026). LPA interviewed Staff #1 (S1) - Staff #3 (S3) and Resident 2 (R2) – Resident #9 (R9). Resident #1 (R1) was not interviewed because they are in a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). *****CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C***** Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff does not ensure resident is allowed to be readmitted to the facility. It is alleged that on 06/09/2026, facility is refusing to readmit R1 from SNF due to care needs unless they are placed on hospice care. All staff interviewed denied the allegation. Staff stated that R1 was transferred to SNF on 05/19/2026 due to worsening respiratory conditions. Prior to R1's release at SNF, S3 re-assessed R1 on 06/10/2026 to ensure that their needs are met upon their return. However, S3 determined that R1's condition has changed requiring a higher level of care that the facility was unable to provide. R1 also has a highly communicable condition that poses a high risk of infection to both staff and the current residents if readmitted. Staff informed R1's family about the decision and facility will provide a 30-day eviction notice to terminate the residency agreement. Staff also added that they are prepared to assist in finding appropriate alternative placement for R1. (5) of (8) residents stated that the facility readmitted them to the facility after being hospitalized, without any issues. All (8) residents stated that staff provide the care and assistance they need. LPA reviewed R1’s physician reassessment which confirmed that R1 requires a higher level of care due to their complex healthcare needs, chronic comorbidities and high risk of antibiotic resistance. In addition, physician stated that the facility is unable to provide services suitable for R1. Documentation reviewed and interviews conducted do not corroborate this allegation. Based on statements and interviews conducted with residents and staff as well as reviewed files and documentation, there was not enough supportive evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Donghyun Moon, Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260609142602
Mar 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained bruises, due to staff neglect.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Donghyun Moon, Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA conducted a tour of the facility, obtained copies of the Staff and Resident rosters, Staff in-service training log on Mandated reporting, Personal rights and Gait mobility/Repositioning of residents, Staff 72-hour log notes and Resident #1 (R1)'s files such as: Face sheet/Identification and Emergency Information, Physician's Report, Medication list, Hospice care plan and notes, Unusual Injury/Incident Report/SIR, photo of R1's arm, LPA also interviewed Staff #1 (S1) - Staff #5 (S5), Resident #1 (R1) - Resident #8 (R8) and Hospice Nurse #1 (N1). The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: "Resident sustained bruises, due to staff neglect." It is alleged that a large bruise was observed on R1's left arm while being given a shower. In addition, R1 has been observed to have bruises several times in the past. *****CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C***** Unsubstantiated Interviews conducted with staff members indicated they have seen R1's bruise on the left arm but denied it was caused by neglect. Staff members interviewed indicated they have never physically abused or handled R1 or any of the residents in a rough manner, nor have they seen it happen. Staff members also stated that they have received the necessary training on how to transfer the residents and how to reposition them. S5 stated that R1 has had the bruise on her arm since December 2025 and has taken actions and interventions to prevent the bruising. S5 also indicated that aging causes R1 to have thinner or fragile skin and that the bruise on R1 may have been caused by medication side effects. Some staff stated that on either March 6 or March 7, 2026, the police came to conduct a welfare check on R1 but did not have any information nor contact details provided to them. Documents reviewed revealed that the facility has sufficient staffing and that the staff members have the proper documentation and notes. Moreover, the photos of R1's bruise appeared to be consistent with R1's thin skin and possible medication side effects. During the visit, LPA observed S3 and N1 assisting and transferring R1 from wheelchair to bed. Interviews conducted with (8) residents indicated they have not been hit or handled aggressively by any of the staff. All residents interviewed indicated that staff are well trained, helpful and nice to them. Interview with R1 revealed that the staff are nice to them and they had not been hurt nor injured by any staff. Additionally, R1 does not have a roommate and there were no witnesses, surveillance footage, or evidence obtained during the investigation to corroborate with the allegation. Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, residents, review of resident files and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided to Donghyun Moon, Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260306101319
Dec 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted an unannounced Required- 1 year visit. LPA was met by Christina Matsumoto, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to serve for a capacity of (120) non ambulatory residents, age range 60 and over, of which (10) may be bedridden. Rooms 129-145 and all 1st floor rooms approved for bedridden except for room 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, and 111. Exterior gates approved for delayed egress. Hospice waiver for (20) has been approved. The facility has a new management, Walnut Silver Town effective 10/15/2025. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Infection Control: Infection control practices and Personal Protective Equipment (PPEs) were maintained. Bathrooms have hygiene items such as paper towel, hand soap and toilet paper. Staff are adhering to infection control requirements. Operational Requirements: The facility has an approved fire clearance, there is a plan of operation with required Infection Control Plan. The facility has a dementia care plan to accept or retain residents with dementia. Facility maintains the required liability insurance which expires on 12/22/2025. Facility does not handle residents cash resources. Physical Plant/Environment Safety: The facility is a 2 story building with resident rooms on both floors. The main floor consists of the main lobby, administrative offices, activity room, dining room, kitchen, resident rooms, laundry room and the memory care unit. The 2nd floor consists mainly of resident rooms, medication room, office, laundry room and activity rooms. LPA selected random rooms in the 1st and 2nd floors to inspect. They are clean and have the required furnishings. There are no items obstructing the walkways. The fireplace is adequately screened. There are multiple carbon monoxide detectors in each hallway and fire sprinklers throughout the facility. There are shaded areas with outdoor furniture in the Memory Care unit and Assisted Living unit provided to the residents. There are no pools or large bodies of water. Facility has sufficient space to accommodate indoor and outdoor activities. There are planned activities daily. There are sufficient food supplies of 2-day perishable and a week of non-perishable items as well as water supply. The foods are properly stored in the refrigerator. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. The facility has central air and heating accommodations. The hot water temperature was tested throughout the facility and measured within Title 22 Regulation guidelines. Storage areas for cleaning solutions, toxic, knives, and hazardous items were inaccessible to residents. The fire extinguishers were observed to be fully charged. *****CONTINUED ON LIC809-C***** Staffing: A total of 62 staff members including the Administrator provide care and supervision to the residents. There is sufficient staffing for each shift. Staff employed are over the age of 18 and have criminal background clearance, fingerprint cleared, have training and associated to the facility. Personnel Records-Training: The Administrator's certificate expires on 07/25/2027. Staff have criminal background clearance and training. (7) staff files were reviewed. There is at least one staff with CPR & First Aid training on each shift. Proof of staff training, health clearance and 1st Aid/CPR training are current. Resident Rights-Information: A total of (10) resident files were reviewed. They contained admission agreements, Physician's Reports, Appraisal, Individual Needs/Service Plans, TB clearance, Functional Capability Assessment, Physician's Orders, medical consent, and medication records, RCFE complaint poster and Personal rights were observed posted in the lobby. Planned Activities: Sufficient space to accommodate both indoor and outdoor activities was observed. An activity calendar is posted in the lobby and the elevator. The facility has a Resident Council. Food Service: Sufficient food supply is stored in the kitchen and pantry areas consisting of: 2-day perishables, 7-day non-perishables, and emergency food supplies. Sanitation practices and kitchen cleanliness was observed. Incidental Medical and Dental: Residents medications were reviewed containing 30-day supply of medications to confirm medication is given as prescribed and is documented properly. The facility uses the Quick Medication Administration Record (MAR) log to document medications given. Medications are centrally stored and locked in the medication room. Facility uses medical carts. Medications are administered as prescribed. Medical and dental transportation is provided. First aid is available and stored in each medical cart. Resident Records-Incident Reports: Resident files are kept in a secured location and have the following documents in their files: Pre-admission appraisal/Appraisal Needs & Services Plan, Admission Agreements, Identification & Emergency Information and current Physician's Report. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has an Emergency Disaster Plan with contact numbers. Facility conducts fire drill at least quarterly for each shift. Last fire drill was conducted on 09/29/2025. Residents with Special Health Needs: (2) residents who are utilizing oxygen tanks have signs posted at the front door. There are (10) residents receiving hospice care in the facility. Staff provide support care and supervision appropriate to meet the need of the residents receiving care from a Hospice agency. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Christina Matsumoto, Executive Director.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2025
Apr 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaging resident’s medication(s). Staff misplaced resident’s medication(s). Staff billing resident for medication not administered.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Christina Matsumoto/S-1 and discussed the purpose of today's visit. During the initial visit (02/18/25), LPA obtained a copy of the staff and resident rosters, interviewed Staff #1 (S-1)/Facility Administrator and reviewed Resident #1 (R-1) file and obtained relevant documentation. During the course of this investigation, LPA also interviewed Staff #2 (S-2) through Staff #4 (S-4) and Resident #1 (R-1) through Resident #7 (R-7). Refer to LIC 9099C for the continuation of this report. Unsubstantiated Staff mismanaging resident’s medication(s). It has been alleged that staff are mismanaging R-1’s sodium chloride medication. Staff interviews revealed that staff made numerous attempts to contact R-1’s physician to have R-1’s sodium chloride medication discontinued (per R-1’s authorized representative request) and were unsuccessful. Interviewed staff indicated that R-1’s authorized representative was successful in reaching R-1’s physician and obtained an order to discontinue the sodium chloride medication in which facility staff discontinued administering since receiving this new order (discontinued on 01/24/25). Resident interviews revealed that staff do not mismanage medications. Interviewed residents indicated that staff provide their medication as prescribed. Interviewed residents indicated they have not heard anyone complain nor have any concerns pertaining to this matter. Interviews do not corroborate this allegation. Staff misplaced resident’s medication(s). It has been alleged that Atenolol medication for R-1 was provided to a med tech “last September” and it was misplaced. Interviewed staff indicated that staff do not misplace residents’ medications. Staff interviews revealed that Atenolol medication for R-1 was not received from R-1’s authorized representative. Resident interviews revealed that staff do not misplace residents’ medications. Interviewed residents indicated they have not heard anyone complain nor have any concerns pertaining to this matter. Interviews do not corroborate this allegation. Staff billing resident for medication not administered. It has been alleged that staff are billing R-1 for medication that is not administered. Interviewed staff indicated that the staff nor this facility are not involved with billing for medications as the billing comes directly from the pharmacy. Interviewed staff indicated that residents and/or authorized representatives are responsible for paying any medical/pharmacy co-pays directly to those entities and not to this facility. Interviewed staff indicated that the medication billed and received by the pharmacy is administered as prescribed. Staff interviews revealed they have not received any complaints pertaining to this matter. Resident interviews revealed that residents pay their own co-pays for medical and medication services directly to the providers and not this facility. Interviewed residents indicated they have not heard anyone complain nor have any concerns pertaining to this matter. Interviews do not corroborate this allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted, appeals rights and a copy of this report was provided to Christina Matsumoto/S-1/Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250212113650
Mar 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff administered felony drugs to resident. Resident sustained an unexplained head injury.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a subsequent visit to continue the investigation on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Christina Matsumoto, and explained the purpose of the visit. On 1/23/25, LPA Chan conducted the initial visit and toured the physical plant. LPA obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters and collected documents for Resident #1. No health and safety concerns were observed. During the visit today, LPA interviewed the Administrator, Staff #1 - #6, and Residents #1 - #8. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation – Staff administered felony drugs to resident. It is alleged that Resident #1 (R1) tested positive for cocaine and PCP. LPA obtained medication records for R1 and were reviewed by the Department of Social Services clinical consultant nurse. Unsubstantiated There was no indication that the medications R1 is taking can produce false positives for cocaine and PCP. However, the hospital medical records showed that R1 was tested positive for felony drugs. The administrator and Staff were interviewed regarding this allegation. Per the administrator, no felony drugs were given to the resident. Staff interviewed denied giving R1 any illegal drugs and did not notice any signs of drug use. R1 did not behave differently prior to being hospitalized. The med techs stated they only administer medications that are prescribed by the physician, and they are careful in distributing the medications. LPA interviewed R1 who did not remember how resident fell but stated there was no usual item given by staff or visitors. Although R1 tested positive for cocaine and PCP, there is no evidence that the facility staff gave the drugs. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation - Resident sustained an unexplained head injury. LPA interviewed the administrator, Staff, and Residents on this allegation. The facility submitted an incident report to Licensing regarding Resident #1's fall in January. Resident #1 (R1) had a fall on 1/17/25 at approximately 2 a.m. and sustained a head injury. Per the administrator, R1 resided in the assisted living side at the time of the fall. Staff indicated R1 does not like to ask for assistance and would go to the restroom on own. For this reason, staff would ensure that the assistive devices are moved closer to the resident, and nothing is obstructing the walkway. Staff interviewed stated they check on R1 at least every 2 hours and remind resident to press the pendant if assistance is needed. R1’s son was aware of the resident's falls and was in communication with the administrator to move R1 to the memory care unit prior to the last fall. LPA interviewed 8 residents during today’s visit. All the residents stated staff check on them and will assist if needed. Although the resident sustained a head injury, there is no sufficient evidence to show that there is a lack of care/supervision. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with the administrator. A copy of this report along with the appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250121093142
Feb 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are discriminating against resident. Staff are not safeguarding residents belongings.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with Executive Director, Christina Matsumoto. LPA obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters, reviewed file for Resident #1, and interviewed the administrator, 4 Staff members, and 9 Residents. For allegation – Staff are discriminating against resident. LPA interviewed staff and residents regarding this allegation. Staff stated they do not discriminate against residents. They provide reasonable accommodation if needed and treat residents fairly. For the incident in the dining room, the administrator stated she had explained and kindly asked the resident to move from the seat one time because it had been another resident’s daily seating. The resident got upset but got up to move on own. Unsubstantiated Staff indicated that the resident occasionally comes out to the dining room to eat and had moved from table to table due to preference. They do not tell the resident that they cannot sit at a particular spot but would let the resident know of available spots. LPA interviewed 9 residents, and 8 out of the 9 feel that the staff are kind and respectful. They have not felt discriminated by staff or have seen them discriminate against others. Allegation – Staff do not safeguard resident’s belongings. The administrator stated they try their best to safeguard belongings. The residents have their keys to their rooms and staff would only go in to do housekeeping or provide assistance. Staff interviewed do not touch or move residents' belongings without their consent. Staff stated that when a resident reports something missing/stolen, they would look for it right away. Sometimes the reported items were found misplaced in their rooms. LPA interviewed 9 residents. 3 out of the 9 residents have reported some of their belongings or money were stolen from their rooms. One of the residents stated their belongings were recovered after looking in the room. The rest of the residents did not have any missing or stolen items. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report along with the appeal rights was provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250131144725
Nov 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted the required annual inspection on 11/8/24. LPA arrived unannounced and met with the Executive Director, Christina Matsumoto. The facility is licensed to serve 120 non-ambulatory residents, ages 60 and over, of which 10 may be bedridden. Rooms #129 - #145 and all first floor rooms (except for rooms #101, #103, #105, #107, #109, and #111) are approved for bedridden. The 3 exterior gates are approved for delayed egress. There is a hospice waiver for 20 residents. LPA inspected the facility using the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools. The facility is a 2 story building with resident rooms on both floors. The main floor consists of the main lobby, dining room, kitchen, resident rooms, and the memory care unit. The 2nd floor consists mainly of resident rooms and activity rooms. There is no swimming pool on the premises. LPA selected 8 random rooms (#112, #141, #143, #156, #215, #225, #226, and #238) to inspect. The rooms have non-skid mats and the hot water temperature was measured within range of 105-120 degrees F. There are multiple carbon monoxide detectors in each hallway. The fireplace is adequately screened. Facility has sufficient space to accommodate indoor and outdoor activities. There are planned activities daily. There are sufficient food supplies of 2-day perishable and a week of non-perishable items as well as water supply. The foods are properly stored in the refrigerator. The facility has a dementia care plan to accept or retain residents with dementia. Residents utilizing oxygen tanks have signs posted at the front door. Facility is continuing to follow their infection control plan and using appropriate hand hygiene. Gloves are worn by staff while assisting residents with some of the activities of daily living. The liability insurance is still current for the coverage of $1 million (per occurrence) and $3 million (total annual aggregate). Per the administrator, there is sufficient staffing for each shift. There is at least one staff with CPR & First Aid training on each shift. LPA reviewed 5 personnel files. The Administrator's certificate expires on 7/25/25. The staff files have the required documents and have fingerprint clearance. Staff are receiving the appropriate training for dementia care. LPA reviewed 8 resident files. The files contain the admission agreement, medical assessment with TB results, consent forms, property valuable form, and pre-appraisal form. Medications are centrally stored in a locked cart in the med room. The medications were checked for 6 out of the 8 residents and there were no discrepancies found. Information for appropriate reporting agencies are posted at the facility. The facility has the updated Emergency Disaster Plan and is receiving unannounced fire drills/disaster drills training from a specialist for all shifts. There were no deficiencies issued today. An exit interview was held and a copy of this report was given to Administrator Matsumoto.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 8, 2024
Nov 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a subsequent visit to finish the annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Christina Matsumoto, to explained the reason for the visit. LPA continued the inspection using the CARE tools. The following domains were reviewed: Staffing: The facility has sufficient staffing to meet the needs of the residents. There are awake staff providing night supervision in both assisted living side and the memory care unit. Personnel Records-Training: LPA reviewed 5 Staff files. The administrator's (Christina Matsumoto) certificate expires on 7/25/25. Staff have fingerprint clearance and associated to the facility. Staff have appropriate dementia care training and ongoing training. Resident Records-Incident Reports: LPA reviewed 5 resident files. The files contain the admission agreement, medical assessment with TB results, consent forms, property valuable form, and pre-appraisal form. Resident Rights-Information: Information for appropriate reporting agencies are posted at the facility. Residents' rights are respected and implemented by staff. Incidental Medical & Dental: The medications are centrally stored in the wellness office. The facility uses an electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR) log to document medications given. LPA reviewed 5 residents' medication and they are being administered as prescribed by the physician. Residents with Special Health Needs: Facility accepts and retain residents with dementia. Staff are ensuring that incontinence residents are changed often and the facility remains free of odor from incontinence. No smoking-Oxygen in use signs are posted where appropriate. The facility has approved delayed egress on 3 of the exterior gates. No deficiencies are issued today. A technical violation is provided on the LIC9102 form. An exit interview was held and a copy of this report was given to Administrator Matsumoto.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 30, 2023
The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Nov 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cynthia Chan and Sanjay Vaid conducted the required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Christina Matsumoto, and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed for a capacity of 120 residents ages 60 and over, of which 10 may be bedridden. Rooms #129 - #145 and all first floor rooms (except for rooms #101, #103, #105, #107, #109, and #111) are approved for bedridden. The 3 exterior gates are approved for delayed egress. There is a hospice waiver approved for 20 residents. LPAs conducted the inspection using the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tools. The following were observed: Infection Control: The facility staff are using appropriate hand hygiene and wearing gloves while assisting residents. Staff continue to clean and disinfect daily. Facility has sufficient PPE supplies and the Infection Control Plan in place. Operational Requirements: The facility has a dementia care plan to accept or retain residents with dementia. Residents utilizing oxygen tanks have signs posted at the front door. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: The facility is a 2 story building with resident rooms on both floors. The main floor consists of the main lobby, dining room, kitchen, resident rooms, and the memory care unit. The 2nd floor consists mainly of resident rooms and activity rooms. There are no swimming pool or bodies of water on the premises. LPA selected 8 random rooms - (rooms #143, #137, #116, #104, #234, #239, #218, #202) to inspect. The rooms have non-skid mats and the hot water temperature was measured within range of 105-120 degrees F. There are multiple carbon monoxide detectors in each hallway. Planned Activities: Facility has sufficient space to accommodate indoor and outdoor activities. There are planned daily activities and are posted on the monitor. Food Service: There are sufficient food supplies of 2-day perishable and a week of non-perishable items. The food are properly stored in the refrigerator. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has an Emergency Disaster Plan posted with contact numbers and at least 2 relocation sites. There are no deficiencies observed during the visit today. An exit interview was held and a copy of this report was given to administrator Matsumoto.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 28, 2023
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
The Leaning Pine
Diamond Bar · Small home · 1.9 mi away
$4,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
Kathleen Care Home
Diamond Bar · Small home · 2.2 mi away
$4,300 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Acacia Guest Home
Diamond Bar · Small home · 2.6 mi away
$4,650 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Walnut Home Care
Walnut · Small home · 2.7 mi away
$4,100 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Delta Home Care
West Covina · Small home · 2.7 mi away
$5,100 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Delta Home Care II
West Covina · Small home · 2.7 mi away
$4,900 a month to start · Covelight estimate