Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Atria Covina

Large community·Licensed for 90·Covina, California

Licensed since 1989Licence #191592479
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Starting rate$3,845 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 90Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit63 of 90 beds occupiedFebruary 9, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 11, 2026CDSS inspection record

Atria Covina is a large care community in Covina — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 90 residents since 1989. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Atria Covina

Is Atria Covina licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Atria Covina licensed for?

90 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Atria Covina been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 1989, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 20 state visits over the same years.

Is Atria Covina still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Atria Covina cost?

$3,845 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 120 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,088 to $5,973 a month, and the middle figure is $4,195 (n = 120 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Atria Covina take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Wg Covina Sh LP; Atria Management Co LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Atria Management Co LLC — at least 22 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kindred Hospital - San Gabriel Valley is 0.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Atria Covina keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Atria Covina license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ATRIA COVINA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #191592479. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 90 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Wg Covina Sh LP; Atria Management Co LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1989, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • 20 state inspection visits since 1989, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 1989, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 20 state visits in that period.
  • 6 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 1989, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 11, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 56 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND OVER, 56 NON-AMBULATORY IN ROOMS: IST FLR-102, 104,105, 108, 110, 112, 113, 119, 121, 122, 126, 128, 129. 2ND FLR- 205 THRU 207, 210 THRU 212, 214, 216, 218, 223, 22 5, 229, 232 THRU 236.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Mechanical lift (Hoyer / sit-to-stand) available — reported no

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

    caring.com · 2026-09-09

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Assisted living

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Assistance with transfers

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Medication management

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • ASL or Deaf-community services

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Independent living

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Mechanical lift (Hoyer / sit-to-stand) availableReported no

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Toileting assistance

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Respite / short-term stays

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Staff escort to meals, activities and the bathroom

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Nights & staffing

  • Male caregivers on staff

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Staff background checksEvery licensed home in California must do this.

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Training topics namedStaff trained in aging & mobility · Staff trained in ambulatory assistance · Staff trained in behavior management · Staff trained in client rights · Staff trained in diabetes care · Staff trained in disability care · and 5 more

    Staff trained in aging & mobility · Staff trained in ambulatory assistance · Staff trained in behavior management · Staff trained in client rights · Staff trained in diabetes care · Staff trained in disability care · Staff trained in diversity/inclusion/sensitivity · Staff Trained in Ethics · Staff trained in personal care · Staff trained in safety · Trained staff on-site — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Secured building entry

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • CPR / first aid certified staff

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Safety and wellness checks

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Abuse recognition and reporting training

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$3,845a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$3,845a month

Likely $3,845–$4,445

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,845this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,845–$4,445
$3,845
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,845–$7,950
$5,845
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.

8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,050–$9,350.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 825 W San Bernardino Rd, Covina, CA 91722Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 21 documents for this home, and its records count 20 visits since 1989. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 11, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
20
Most recent visit
August 11, 2026
Occupied · February 9, 2026 visit
63 of 90 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 11 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated November 17, 2021 to February 9, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (11). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 11 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints6typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1989.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202635020252202024340202344020223402021220

The last 36 months — 11 of 21 documents

20263 state visits · 5 documents
Aug 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vaid conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit. LPA met with Administrator Crystene Char and the purpose of today's visit was discussed. The facility has a capacity of 90 residents and is licensed to serve elderly residents age 60 and above. The facility is approved for fifty-six (56) non-ambulatory residents. The facility has ten (10) hospice waivers on file. Administrator certificate is current and expires on 12/20/2026. The annual inspection consisted of; conducting physical plant; reviewing food supply, staff and residents’ files, and medication; and interviewing of staff/residents. 1.Infection Control: There are using appropriate hand hygiene and wearing gloves while assisting clients. Staff are cleaning and disinfecting often for high touched surfaces. Facility has an Infection Control Plan in place. 2.Disaster Preparedness: The facility has the Emergency Disaster Plan in place. The emergency disaster drills include fire, elopement, and stairwell evacuation, conducted every quarter. Last emergency drill was on 04/28/2026 Disaster training is conducted by the corporate office every quarter. 3.Resident Rights-Information: Resident rights are included in Resident files. The let-us-no and ombudsman posters were observed to be posted in the hallway near the reception desk. 4.Planned Activities: Activity schedule/calendar is posted inside the activity room. There is an activity coordinator and activity assistant for this facility on weekly basis. CONTINUED ON 809C............... 5.Physical Plant & Environment Safety: LPAs toured facility grounds. The facility is a two-story building with 63 resident rooms. The facility consists of seven (7) office rooms, reception area, medication room, library, activity room, dining room, kitchen, two (2) laundry rooms, two (2) housekeeping storage rooms, staff lounge, and courtyard. Four (4) public restrooms are available which are clean and operational. Smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were observed and are operable. Fire extinguishers are located throughout the premises (service date of 12/10/2025) Water temperature measured in eight (8) residents’ bathrooms is within 105–120-degree F. Bathrooms had non-skid surfaces and grab bars. Knives, cleaning solutions, and disinfectants are locked and inaccessible to clients. 6.Operational Requirements: The fire clearance is approved has a capacity of 90 residents and licensed to serve elderly residents age 60 and above. The facility is approved for fifty-six (56) non-ambulatory residents. The facility has ten (10) hospice waivers on file, five (5) residents are on hospice, and eight (8) residents with dementia. Administrator certificate is current and expires on 12/20/2026. Staff are adhering to operational requirements. 7.Food Service: Dining area has adequate seating. Plates, cups and utensils are kept clean and stored properly. Kitchen is kept clean and free from rodents and other vermin. There are sufficient food supplies of 2-day perishable and (1) week of non-perishable items. The food is properly stored in the refrigerator and freezer. Pesticides and cleaning supplies are kept away from the food preparation areas. Weekly menu is posted in hallway next to dining hall. Special diets are served, low sodium, low/no sugar. Residents can request special meals. 8.Staffing: Facility has reasonable staffing; staff were observed assisting residents with their activities. 9.Personnel Records-Training: Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA reviewed staff files for Staff #1 through Staff #5. Staff have their Health and TB Screening on file. Association and clearance. First Aid and CPR certificates on file. 10.Resident Records-Incident Reports: LPA reviewed Resident files for Resident #1 through Resident #6. Resident files are maintained at the facility. Admission Agreement, Physician's Report (including T.B and Ambulatory Status), Consent for Medical Treatment, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Resident Pre-Appraisal, Functional Capabilities, ALW assessment and Resident Rights were observed. 11.Incidental M&D: The medications are centrally stored in the medication room and in bubble packs and/or original containers. Medications are administered as prescribed by the Physician and marked in the Medicine Administered Record (MARs). 12.Residents with SHN: Facility does not use manual restraints at this facility. No deficiencies were noted on today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Crystene Char and copy of LIC 809s were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2026
Feb 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medications to resident as prescribed. Staff did not provide resident’s representative with requested records in a timely manner. Licensee charged resident for services not received.

***This report supersedes the report delivered on 01/16/2026. The findings will remain unsubstantiated. *** On 01/16/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vaid conducted a subsequential visit to deliver the findings for the above-mentioned allegations. Met with Crystene Char, toured the facility and did not observe any health and safety concerns. On 12/12/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vaid conducted a subsequential visit to deliver the findings for the above-mentioned allegations. Met with Crystene Char, toured the facility and did not observe any health and safety concerns. On 5/6/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) S Vaid conducted an initial 10-day complaint investigation visit for the above allegations. LPA met with Irina Sarkisyan, Community Business Director, Crystene Char, Administrator was notified, Administrator arrived shortly after, and complaint was discussed. LPA Vaid and Administrator Char did not observe any safety concerns during the facility tour. CONTINUED ON 9099C…………………. Unsubstantiated ***This report supersedes the report delivered on 01/16/2026. The findings will remain unsubstantiated. *** The investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the physical plant. LPA Interviewed staff 1-7 (S1-S7), and residents #2-#8 (R2-R8) resident R1 is currently in skilled nursing home. LPA requested, collected, and reviewed documents from R1's face sheet, physicians reports, admissions agreement, preplacement Assessment, medication log MARs, list of residents’ medications, plan of care and service plan and copies of four (4) random residents: face sheet, physician reports, admissions agreement, preplacement assessments, and medication list. Telephone contact information about staff and residents. Staff and residents’ rosters. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: Staff did not dispense medications to resident as prescribed. It is alleged that the staff did not dispense and administer medications to resident#1(R1) as prescribed. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Staff interviewed stated they dispensed and administered R1’s medication as listed on the prescribed physicians’ orders received. The medications not transferred from R1’s previous pharmacy were communicated to R1’s physician on 04/01/25 and the facility pharmacy was awaiting insurance approval for the medication. Staff stated they communicated the medication and pharmacy issue to R1 and their POA’s to help resolve. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents interviewed could not corroborate this. According to the records reviewed medication list received dated 4/01/25 listed fourteen (14) medications, Nine (9) medications with four (4) PRN’s and one (1) medication on hold. According to records reviewed R1’s pharmacy had already provided R1’s family with the month’s medication allowance. Facility requested R1 and family bring the medication to the facility. Facility made multiple attempts to notify R1’s physician(s) and requested medication reconciliation, no response was received. R1 moved to the facility on 04/01/25 and was admitted to the hospital on 4/15/25. Records show R1 was administered medications dosage correctly from the MARs log dated 04/01/25 to 04/15/25, staff dispensed and R1 was administered their medication as prescribed. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. CONTINUED ON 9099C........... ***This report supersedes the report delivered on 01/16/2026. The findings will remain unsubstantiated. *** Regarding the allegation: Staff did not provide resident’s representative with requested records in a timely manner. It is alleged that the staff did not provide resident #1(R1) representatives with requested medication records in a timely manner. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied the allegation. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents could not corroborate this allegation. According to staff interviewed, records request is handled by the resident service director and administrator. R1’s POA request for records was communicated to the administrator and request for medication records was provided to R1’s POA within five (5) days. Request for records was made on 4/18/25 and records were provided to R1’s POA on 4/23/25 by the staff at Atria. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation: Licensee charged resident for services not received. It is alleged that the Licensee has charged Resident #1(R1) for services not received. Resident #1 being overcharged with the room rental rate, only having lived in the community for two weeks. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents could not corroborate this allegation. According to record review, R1 signed and dated the admissions agreement and is therefore held responsible for rental payment until the end of April. Thirty (30)day notice to leave the community was sent the administrator on 4/18/25, R1 is responsible for the payment of the room rental until 05/18/25, as agreed in the admissions agreement dated 03/31/2025 by R1. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted and copy of these licensing report was provided to Administrator Crystene Char.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2026 · control 28-AS-20250501163701
Jan 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medications to resident as prescribed. Staff did not provide resident’s representative with requested records in a timely manner. Licensee charged resident for services not received.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vaid conducted a subsequential visit to deliver the findings for the above-mentioned allegations. Met with Crystene Char, toured the facility and did not observe any health and safety concerns. On 5/6/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) S Vaid conducted an initial 10-day complaint investigation visit for the above allegations. LPA met with Irina Sarkisyan, Community Business Director, Crystene Char, Administrator was notified, Administrator arrived shortly after, and complaint was discussed. LPA Vaid and Administrator Char did not observe any safety concerns during the facility tour. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the physical plant. LPA Interviewed staff 1-7 (S1-S7), and residents #2-#8 (R2-R8) resident R1 is currently in skilled nursing home. LPA requested, collected, and reviewed documents from R1's face sheet, physicians reports, admissions agreement, preplacement Assessment, medication log MARs, list of residents’ medications, plan of care and service plan and copies of four (4) random residents: face sheet, physician reports, admissions agreement, preplacement assessments, and medication list. Telephone contact information about staff and residents. Staff and residents’ rosters. CONTINUED ON 9099C…………………. Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: Staff did not dispense medications to resident as prescribed. It is alleged that the staff did not dispense and administer medications to resident# 1(R1) as prescribed. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Staff interviewed stated they dispensed and administered R1’s medication as listed on the prescribed physicians’ orders received. Four (4) medications were not transferred to the facilities’ pharmacy from R1’s previous pharmacy and therefore were not administered. Staff stated they communicated the medications and pharmacy issue to R1 and their POA’s. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents interviewed could not corroborate this. According to the records reviewed medication list dated 4/01/25 listed fifteen (15) medications, four medications are shown as not administered. R1 moved to the facility on 04/01/25 and was admitted to the hospital on 4/15/25. Records show R1 was administered medications dosage correctly. The medical report dated 4/16/25, indicated R1’s attending physician suspected R1 did not receive medications at assisted living due to issues with the pharmacy. Staff dispensed all the prescribed medications transferred from R1’s previous pharmacy and awaiting approval from R1’s insurance to approval of the remaining. Medications log indicates all medications were prescribed were dispensed and administered to R1. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation: Staff did not provide resident’s representative with requested records in a timely manner. It is alleged that the staff did not provide resident #1(R1) representatives with requested medication records in a timely manner. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied the allegation. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents could not corroborate this allegation. According to staff interviewed, records request is handled by the resident service director and administrator. R1’s POA request for records was communicated to the administrator and request for medication records was provided to R1’s POA within five (5) days. Request for records was made on 4/18/25 and records were provided to R1’s POA on 4/23/25 by the staff at Atria. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. CONTINUED 9099C……….. Regarding the allegation: Licensee charged resident for services not received. It is alleged that the Licensee has charged Resident #1(R1) for services not received. Resident #1 being overcharged with the room rental rate, only having lived in the community for two weeks. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents could not corroborate this allegation. According to record review, R1 signed and dated the admissions agreement and is therefore held responsible for rental payment until the end of April. Thirty (30)day notice to leave the community was sent the administrator on 4/18/25, R1 is responsible for the payment of the room rental until 05/18/25, as agreed in the admissions agreement dated 03/31/2025 by R1. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Copy of this report was provided to Administrator Crystene Char.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2026 · control 28-AS-20250501163701
Jan 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medications to resident as prescribed. Staff did not provide resident’s representative with requested records in a timely manner. Licensee charged resident for services not received.

****The reason for the amendment is to remove confidential information listed on the initial report dated 12/12/25. The findings will remain unsubstantiated. ** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vaid conducted a subsequential visit to deliver the findings for the above-mentioned allegations. Met with Crystene Char, toured the facility and did not observe any health and safety concerns. On 05/06/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) S Vaid conducted an initial 10-day complaint investigation visit for the above allegations. LPA met with Irina Sarkisyan, Community Business Director, Crystene Char, Administrator was notified, Administrator arrived shortly after, and complaint was discussed. LPA Vaid and Administrator Char did not observe any safety concerns during the facility tour. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the physical plant. LPA Interviewed staff 1-7 (S1-S7), and residents #2-#8 (R2-R8) resident R1 is currently in skilled nursing home. LPA requested, collected, and reviewed documents from R1's face sheet, physicians reports, admissions agreement, preplacement Assessment, medication log MARs, list of residents’ medications, plan of care and service plan and copies of four (4) random residents: face sheet, physician reports, admissions agreement, preplacement assessments, and medication list. Telephone contact information about staff and residents. Staff and residents’ rosters. CONTINUED ON 9099C…………………. Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: Staff did not dispense medications to resident as prescribed. It is alleged that the staff did not dispense and administer medications to resident#1 (R1) as prescribed. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Staff interviewed stated they dispensed and administered R1’s medication as listed on the prescribed physicians’ orders received. The medications not transferred from R1’s previous pharmacy were communicated to R1’s physician on 04/01/25 and the facility pharmacy was awaiting insurance approval for the medication. Staff stated they communicated the medication and pharmacy issue to R1 and their POA’s to help resolve. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents interviewed could not corroborate this. According to the records reviewed medication list received dated 4/01/25 listed fourteen (14) medications, Nine (9) medications with four (4) PRN’s and one (1) medication on hold. Staff awaited approval from R1’s insurance for the remainder. R1 moved to the facility on 04/01/25 and was admitted to the hospital on 4/15/25. Records show R1 was administered medications dosage correctly from the MARs log dated 04/01/25 to 04/15/25, staff dispensed and R1 was administered their medication as prescribed. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation: Staff did not provide resident’s representative with requested records in a timely manner. It is alleged that the staff did not provide resident #1(R1) representatives with requested medication records in a timely manner. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied the allegation. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents could not corroborate this allegation. According to staff interviewed, records request is handled by the resident service director and administrator. R1’s POA request for records was communicated to the administrator and request for medication records was provided to R1’s POA within five (5) days. Request for records was made on 4/18/25 and records were provided to R1’s POA on 4/23/25 by the staff at Atria. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. CONTINUED 9099C……….. Regarding the allegation: Licensee charged resident for services not received. It is alleged that the Licensee has charged Resident #1(R1) for services not received. Resident #1 being overcharged with the room rental rate, only having lived in the community for two weeks. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents could not corroborate this allegation. According to record review, R1 signed and dated the admissions agreement and is therefore held responsible for rental payment until the end of April. Thirty (30)day notice to leave the community was sent the administrator on 4/18/25, R1 is responsible for the payment of the room rental until 05/18/25, as agreed in the admissions agreement dated 03/31/2025 by R1. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Copy of this report was provided to Administrator Crystene Char.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2026 · control 28-AS-20250501163701
Jan 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medications to resident as prescribed. Staff did not provide resident’s representative with requested records in a timely manner. Licensee charged resident for services not received.

***This report supersedes the report delivered on 12/19/2025. The findings will remain unsubstantiated. *** On 12/12/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vaid conducted a subsequential visit to deliver the findings for the above-mentioned allegations. Met with Crystene Char, toured the facility and did not observe any health and safety concerns. On 5/6/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) S Vaid conducted an initial 10-day complaint investigation visit for the above allegations. LPA met with Irina Sarkisyan, Community Business Director, Crystene Char, Administrator was notified, Administrator arrived shortly after, and complaint was discussed. LPA Vaid and Administrator Char did not observe any safety concerns during the facility tour. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the physical plant. LPA Interviewed staff 1-7 (S1-S7), and residents #2-#8 (R2-R8) resident R1 is currently in skilled nursing home. LPA requested, collected, and reviewed documents from R1's face sheet, physicians reports, admissions agreement, preplacement Assessment, medication log MARs, list of residents’ medications, plan of care and service plan and copies of four (4) random residents: face sheet, physician reports, admissions agreement, preplacement assessments, and medication list. Telephone contact information about staff and residents. Staff and residents’ rosters. CONTINUED ON 9099C…………………. Unsubstantiated ***This report supersedes the report delivered on 12/19/2025. The findings will remain unsubstantiated. *** The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: Staff did not dispense medications to resident as prescribed. It is alleged that the staff did not dispense and administer medications to resident#1(R1) as prescribed. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Staff interviewed stated they dispensed and administered R1’s medication as listed on the prescribed physicians’ orders received. The medications not transferred from R1’s previous pharmacy were communicated to R1’s physician on 04/01/25 and the facility pharmacy was awaiting insurance approval for the medication. Staff stated they communicated the medication and pharmacy issue to R1 and their POA’s to help resolve. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents interviewed could not corroborate this. According to the records reviewed medication list received dated 4/01/25 listed fourteen (14) medications, Nine (9) medications with four (4) PRN’s and one (1) medication on hold. According to records reviewed R1’s pharmacy had already provided R1’s family with the month’s medication allowance. Facility requested R1 and family bring the medication to the facility. Facility made multiple attempts to notify R1’s physician(s) and requested medication reconciliation, no response was received. R1 moved to the facility on 04/01/25 and was admitted to the hospital on 4/15/25. Records show R1 was administered medications dosage correctly from the MARs log dated 04/01/25 to 04/15/25, staff dispensed and R1 was administered their medication as prescribed. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation: Staff did not provide resident’s representative with requested records in a timely manner. It is alleged that the staff did not provide resident #1(R1) representatives with requested medication records in a timely manner. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied the allegation. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents could not corroborate this allegation. According to staff interviewed, records request is handled by the resident service director and administrator. R1’s POA request for records was communicated to the administrator and request for medication records was provided to R1’s POA within five (5) days. Request for records was made on 4/18/25 and records were provided to R1’s POA on 4/23/25 by the staff at Atria. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. CONTINUED 9099C……….. ***This report supersedes the report delivered on 12/19/2025. The findings will remain unsubstantiated. *** Regarding the allegation: Licensee charged resident for services not received. It is alleged that the Licensee has charged Resident #1(R1) for services not received. Resident #1 being overcharged with the room rental rate, only having lived in the community for two weeks. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents could not corroborate this allegation. According to record review, R1 signed and dated the admissions agreement and is therefore held responsible for rental payment until the end of April. Thirty (30)day notice to leave the community was sent the administrator on 4/18/25, R1 is responsible for the payment of the room rental until 05/18/25, as agreed in the admissions agreement dated 03/31/2025 by R1. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Copy of this report was provided to Administrator Crystene Char.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2026 · control 28-AS-20250501163701
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medications to resident as prescribed. Staff did not provide resident’s representative with requested records in a timely manner. Licensee charged resident for services not received.

***This report supersedes the report delivered on 12/12/2025. The reason for the amendment is to remove confidential information listed on the initial report. The findings will remain unsubstantiated. *** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vaid conducted a subsequential visit to deliver the findings for the above-mentioned allegations. Met with Crystene Char, toured the facility and did not observe any health and safety concerns. On 5/6/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) S Vaid conducted an initial 10-day complaint investigation visit for the above allegations. LPA met with Irina Sarkisyan, Community Business Director, Crystene Char, Administrator was notified, Administrator arrived shortly after, and complaint was discussed. LPA Vaid and Administrator Char did not observe any safety concerns during the facility tour. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the physical plant. LPA Interviewed staff 1-7 (S1-S7), and residents #2-#8 (R2-R8) resident R1 is currently in skilled nursing home. LPA requested, collected, and reviewed documents from R1's face sheet, physicians reports, admissions agreement, preplacement Assessment, medication log MARs, list of residents’ medications, plan of care and service plan and copies of four (4) random residents: face sheet, physician reports, admissions agreement, preplacement assessments, and medication list. Telephone contact information about staff and residents. Staff and residents’ rosters. CONTINUED ON 9099C…………………. Unsubstantiated ***This report supersedes the report delivered on 12/12/2025. The reason for the amendment is to remove confidential information listed on the initial report. The findings will remain unsubstantiated. *** The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: Staff did not dispense medications to resident as prescribed. It is alleged that the staff did not dispense and administer medications to resident# 1(R1) as prescribed. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Staff interviewed stated they dispensed and administered R1’s medication as listed on the prescribed physicians’ orders received. The medications not transferred from R1’s previous pharmacy were communicated to R1’s physician on 04/01/25 and the facility pharmacy was awaiting insurance approval for the medication. Staff stated they communicated the medication and pharmacy issue to R1 and their POA’s to help resolve. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents interviewed could not corroborate this. According to the records reviewed medication list received dated 4/01/25 listed fourteen (14) medications, Nine (9) medications with four (4) PRN’s and one (1) medication on hold. Staff awaited approval from R1’s insurance for the remainder. R1 moved to the facility on 04/01/25 and was admitted to the hospital on 4/15/25. Records show R1 was administered medications dosage correctly from the MARs log dated 04/01/25 to 04/15/25, staff dispensed and R1 was administered their medication as prescribed. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation: Staff did not provide resident’s representative with requested records in a timely manner. It is alleged that the staff did not provide resident #1(R1) representatives with requested medication records in a timely manner. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied the allegation. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents could not corroborate this allegation. According to staff interviewed, records request is handled by the resident service director and administrator. R1’s POA request for records was communicated to the administrator and request for medication records was provided to R1’s POA within five (5) days. Request for records was made on 4/18/25 and records were provided to R1’s POA on 4/23/25 by the staff at Atria. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. CONTINUED 9099C……….. ***This report supersedes the report delivered on 12/12/2025. The reason for the amendment is to remove confidential information listed on the initial report. The findings will remain unsubstantiated. *** Regarding the allegation: Licensee charged resident for services not received. It is alleged that the Licensee has charged Resident #1(R1) for services not received. Resident #1 being overcharged with the room rental rate, only having lived in the community for two weeks. Seven (7) of seven (7) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents could not corroborate this allegation. According to record review, R1 signed and dated the admissions agreement and is therefore held responsible for rental payment until the end of April. Thirty (30)day notice to leave the community was sent the administrator on 4/18/25, R1 is responsible for the payment of the room rental until 05/18/25, as agreed in the admissions agreement dated 03/31/2025 by R1. Based on LPAs records reviewed and interviews which were conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Copy of this report was provided to Zugey Soto, Resident Services Directorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250501163701
Aug 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vaid conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit. LPA met with Administrator Crystene Char and the purpose of today's visit was discussed. The facility has a capacity of 90 residents and licensed to serve elderly residents age 60 and above. The facility is approved for fifty-six (56) non-ambulatory residents. The facility has eight (8) hospice waiver on file, eight (8) residents are on hospice, and four (4) residents with dementia. Administrator certificate is current and expiring on 12/20/2026. The annual inspection consisted of applying CARE tools; conducting physical plant; reviewing food supply, staff and residents’ files, and medication; and interviewing of staff/residents. The facility is a two-story building with 63 resident rooms. The facility consists of seven (7) office rooms, reception area, med room, library, activity room, dining room, kitchen, two (2) laundry rooms, two (2) housekeeping storage rooms, staff lounge, and courtyard. Four (4) public restrooms are available which are clean and operational. 1.Infection Control: There are using appropriate hand hygiene and wearing gloves while assisting clients. Staff are cleaning and disinfecting often for high touched surfaces. Facility has an Infection Control Plan in place. [ CONTINUED ON 809C .....] 2.Operational Requirements: The fire clearance is approved has a capacity of 90 residents and licensed to serve elderly residents age 60 and above. The facility is approved for fifty-six (56) non-ambulatory residents. The facility has eight (8) hospice waiver on file, eight (8) residents are on hospice, and four (4) residents with dementia. Staff are adhering to operational requirements. 3.Physical Plant & Environment Safety: LPAs toured facility grounds. Smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were observed. Both, smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors are operable. Fire extinguishers are located throughout the premises (service date of 12/17/2024) Water temperature measured in eight (8) residents’ bathrooms is within 105-120 degree F. Bathrooms had non-skid surfaces and grab bars. Knives, cleaning solutions, and disinfectants are locked and inaccessible to clients. 4.Staffing: Facility has reasonable staffing; staff was observed assisting residents with their activities. 5.Personnel Records-Training: Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA reviewed staff files for S-#1 through Staff #6. Staff have their Health and TB Screening on file. Association and clearance. 6.Resident Rights-Information: Resident rights are included in Resident files. The let-us-no and ombudsman posters were observed to be posted in the hallway near the reception desk. 7.Planned Activities: Activity schedule/calendar is posted inside the activity room. There is an activity coordinator and activity assistant for this facility on weekly basis. 8.Food Service: Dining area has adequate seating. Plates, cups and utensils are kept cleaned and stored properly. Kitchen is kept clean and free from rodents and other vermin. There are sufficient food supplies of 2-day perishable and (1) week of non-perishable items. The food is properly stored in the refrigerator and freezer. Pesticides and cleaning supplies are kept away from the food preparation areas. [ CONTINUED ON 809C.....] 9.Incidental M&D: The medications are centrally stored in the medication room and in bubble packs and/or original containers. Medications are administered as prescribed by the Physician and marked in the Medicine Administered Record(MARs). 10.Resident Records-Incident Reports: LPA reviewed Resident files for Resident #1 through Resident #7. Resident files are maintained at the facility. Admission Agreement, Physician's Report (including T.B and Ambulatory Status), Consent for Medical Treatment, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Resident Pre-Appraisal, Functional Capabilities, ALW assessment and Resident Rights were observed. 11.Disaster Preparedness: The facility has the Emergency Disaster Plan in place. The emergency disaster drills include fire, elopement, stairwell evacuation, conducted every quarter. Last emergency drill was on 6/26/2025. Disaster training is conducted by the corporate office every quarter. 12.Residents with SHN: Facility does not use manual restraints at this facility. No deficiencies were noted on today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Crystene Char and copy of LIC 809s were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an unannounced Case Management- Incident visit in response to resident#1 (R1) Incident Report, dated 08/21/24. The facility has a capacity of 90 residents and licensed to serve elderly residents age 60 and above. The facility is approved for fifty-six (56) non-ambulatory residents. LPA explained the purpose of today's visit to Irina Sarkisyan, Community Business Director who assisted with this visit. During today's visit LPA toured the facility, interviewed Administrator, staff, resident#1 (R1) and reviewed R1's file. The incident report stated R1 reported that staff took R1 out to the courtyard at 7am for 10 mins. R1 was upset and stated staff hit R1. LPA interviewed Administrator/staff revealed that the facility investigated this incident and the finding was unfound. Per interview of R1, resident seem unable to recall the incident. Police came and found it unfound. Case#24-18510. LPA did not observe nor identify signs of neglect, abuse or other immediate health and safety threats. LPA obtained copies of the following documents: · Staff / Resident roster · R1’s Identification/Emergency Contact Information (facesheet) · Unusual Incident Report · Physician Report · In-service training No deficiencies were observed and cited during this visit. Exit interview held and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2024
Aug 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an unannounced Case Management- Incident visit in response to resident’s Incident Report, dated 07/24/24. The facility has a capacity of 90 residents and licensed to serve elderly residents age 60 and above. The facility is approved for fifty-six (56) non-ambulatory residents. LPA met with and explained the purpose of today's visit to Brooke Lamotte, Resident Service Director who assisted with this visit. During today's visit LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff /resident and reviewed resident's file. The incident report stated resident said to the administrator that staff slapped resident’s hands and not allowed resident to use restroom on resident’s initial request. LPA interviewed staff, it revealed the facility had investigated this incident and Brooke called police when she aware of the incident. The Covina Police come to investigate, and the finding was unfound. Police report # 24-16416. Per resident interview, resident stated the suspected abuser staff had slapped resident’s hands multiple times and resident reported no injuries by felt sad about the incidents. Regardless, the administrator decided to let go the suspected abuser staff on 7/25/24. The facility provided the in-service training to facility staff on 8/4/24 regarding abuses and mandated reporter. LPA obtained copies of Staff /Resident roster; Resident’s Identification/Emergency Contact Information (facesheet), Needs and service plan; Unusual Incident Report; Physician Report; In-service training documents and Employee Corrective action plan (let go the staff). LPA did not observe nor identify signs of neglect, abuse or other immediate health and safety threats. No deficiencies were observed and cited during this visit. Exit interview held and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2024
Aug 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit. LPA met with Brooke Lamotte, Resident Service Director and the purpose of today's visit was discussed. The facility has a capacity of 90 residents and licensed to serve elderly residents age 60 and above. The facility is approved for fifty-six (56) non-ambulatory residents. The facility has eight (8) hospice waiver on file, six (6) residents are on hospice, and five (5) residents with dementia. Annual fees are current. Administrator certificate is current and expiring on 8/14/25. This annual inspection consisted of applying CARE tools; conducting physical plant; reviewing food supply, staff and residents files, and medication; and interviewing of staff/residents. The facility is a two-story building with 63 resident rooms. The facility consists of seven (7) office rooms, reception area, beauty salon, med room, library, activity room, dining room, kitchen, two (2) laundry rooms, two (2) housekeeping storage rooms, staff lounge, and courtyard. Four (4) public restrooms are available which are clean and operational. Resident rooms consisted of a bedroom, bathroom and closet. Residents' rooms and bathrooms were inspected and in compliance. Hot water temperature was measured in a range from 106.7 to 120.0 degrees Fahrenheit which was within Title 22 Regulation guidelines. Sufficient supply of perishable and nonperishable foods were observed. (-continued on LIC 809 C-) Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors in residents' rooms are operable. Smoke detectors in the common areas are hard wired and monitored by a fire alarm company which it's last service was on 6/12/24. The fire extinguishers were fully charged. Elevator at the facility is operable. All mandated documents and signages are posted in common areas. The outdoor activity area is free of visible hazards and debris. There is shaded patio and garden areas with ample seating. Medications are centrally stored and locked. Resident records inspected are current. Fire/ Emergency drill conducted on 7/7/24. LPA checked the signal systems in resident rooms and found system to be operable and staff responded to residents in a range from 7 to 10 minutes. No deficiencies were observed to be in violation of California code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. An exit interview was conducted. This report was discussed with Administrator and report LIC 809s were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2024
May 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Tao and Reyes conducted an unannounced Case Management- Incident visit in response to Client (C1’s) Incident Report, dated 04/26/24. The facility has a capacity of 90 residents and licensed to serve elderly residents age 60 and above. The facility is approved for fifty-six (56) non-ambulatory residents. LPAs explained the purpose of today's visit to Irina Sarkisyan, Community Business Director and administrator who assisted with this visit. During today's visit LPA toured the facility, interviewed Administrator, staff, resident#1 (R1) and reviewed R1's file. The incident report stated R1 said to the administrator that staff grabbed and twisted resident#1’s right arm. LPA interviewed Administrator/staff revealed that the facility investigated this incident and the finding was unfound. Per interview of R1, resident seem unable to recall the incident. Staff and hospice nurse were monitoring the resident. LPA did not observe nor identify signs of neglect, abuse or other immediate health and safety threats. LPA obtained copies of the following documents: · Staff roster/Resident roster · R1’s Identification/Emergency Contact Information (facesheet)/ Hospice Document · Needs and service plan/Unusual Incident Report/In-service training · Admission Agreement Attachment C (Personal Rights) · Physician Report /Pre appraisal / Admission Agreement No deficiencies were observed and cited during this visit. Exit interview held and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Private bathroom

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceGarden · Outdoor common areas

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Wifi

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Rooms come furnishedReported no

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasCommunal dining room · Game room · Computer room · TV lounge with cable/satellite · Shared common areas

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Air conditioning in the room

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Emergency call system in the room

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Call system typeWearable pendant

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • AmenitiesBeverages provided · Bed Making Services · Groundskeeping Services · Maintenance & Repair Services · Maintenance Staff On-Site · Pest Control Services · and 8 more

    Beverages provided · Bed Making Services · Groundskeeping Services · Maintenance & Repair Services · Maintenance Staff On-Site · Pest Control Services · Trash Removal Services · Mail delivery · Newspaper delivery · Closet Space In Unit · Individual climate controls in unit · Telephone hookup in unit · Restaurant on-site · Convenient location — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Cable or satellite TV

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Dining styleRestaurant style

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Special diets supportedLow / No Sodium · No Sugar

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • All-day or flexible dining

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegan · Vegetarian

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Residents choose between options at each meal

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Cultural cuisine regularly servedInternational

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Residents have input into the menu

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals served in the room

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Professional chef

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Dining atmosphereCasual dining

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredArts and crafts · Culinary Activities/Programs · Cultural activities/programs · Educational Activities/Programs · Entertainment activities/programs · Music activities · and 6 more

    Arts and crafts · Culinary Activities/Programs · Cultural activities/programs · Educational Activities/Programs · Entertainment activities/programs · Music activities · Organized activities/programs · Performing arts activities/programs · Recreational activities/programs · Seasonal, holiday, and themed events · Social Activities/Events · Tabletop & Other Games/Programs — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Intergenerational programs

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Activities coordinator on staff

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Clergy or chaplain visits

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Languages spoken by caregiversFilipino · Spanish · Russian · American Sign Language · English · Mandarin · and 2 more

    Filipino · Spanish · Russian · American Sign Language · English — reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

    Mandarin · Tagalog · Vietnamese — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Pet types allowedDogs · Cats

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Overnight guests

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Family may bring a pet to visit

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visiting hoursFlexible Visitation Hours

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Pet weight limit

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Pet restrictions

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transport to medical appointments

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Wheelchair-accessible vehicle

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transport for shopping and errands

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transportation costs extraReported no

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transport for group outings

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County