Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Eastvale Senior Home Care II

Small home·Licensed for 6·Eastvale, California

Licensed since 2018Licence #331800424
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,050 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,250
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJanuary 30, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMay 1, 2026CDSS inspection record

Eastvale Senior Home Care II is a small care home in Eastvale — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2018. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Eastvale Senior Home Care II

Is Eastvale Senior Home Care II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Eastvale Senior Home Care II licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Eastvale Senior Home Care II been cited?

5 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Eastvale Senior Home Care II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Eastvale Senior Home Care II cost?

$5,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,150–$6,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 161 other homes of a similar licensed size across Riverside County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 161 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Eastvale Senior Home Care II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Eastvale Senior Home Care LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Eastvale Senior Home Care LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.

Can Eastvale Senior Home Care II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Eastvale Senior Home Care II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “EASTVALE SENIOR HOME CARE II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #331800424. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Eastvale Senior Home Care LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 5 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 5 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 1, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN, BEDRIDDEN TO RESIDE IN BDRM 4 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,050a month to start

Likely $4,150–$6,250

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,050a month

Likely $4,150–$6,400

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,050likely $4,150–$6,250

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,150–$6,400
$5,050
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,850–$9,500
$7,050
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,850–$5,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 14318 Pintail Loop, Eastvale, CA 92880Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2018. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 27, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
8
Most recent visit
May 1, 2026
Occupied · January 30, 2026 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated January 30, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations5typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations5typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2018.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026231202511020241102022330

The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents

20262 state visits · 3 documents
Mar 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Caregiver Nenita Gorospe and was granted entry to the facility. The facility is a (5) bedroom (2) bathroom home and, with a kitchen/dining area, living room, attached garage. LPA was accompanied by Administrator Jerome Alim to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected client bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. There was a designated office that stored resident/staff files. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for clients in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of clients in care. Facility has a variety of food available for clients. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (3) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA observed incomplete Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan for Resident #1 (R1) and and Resident #3 (R3). Deficiency will be issued. Additionally, LPA observed no Reappraisal forms for R1 and R3. Deficiency will be issued. A previous licensing report was issued on 03/27/2025 giving notice of the same violation. Because you have been cited for repeating the same violation within 12 months, the following civil penalty shall be assessed until the violation is corrected. An immediate civil penalty of $250 is hereby assessed for the date of 03/27/2026. LPA reviewed (3) resident medications. LPA observed PRN medication for Resident #2 (R2) and Resident #3 (R3) to not be documented properly on Medication Administration Record (MAR). Deficiency will be issued. Additionally, LPA observed (2) medications not labeled or prescribed by a physician in Resident #3 (R3) medications. Deficiency will be issued. LPA also reviewed (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. No issues observed. Per record review, LPA observed facility accepted (4) hospice residents when facility is only licensed for (2). Deficiency will be issued. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809), (LIC809D), and LIC421IM was discussed and provided to Administrator Jerome Alim. Along with copy of appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2026
Jan 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to staff neglect, resident sustained a pressure injury Staff retained a resident with a prohibited health condition Staff did not notify authorized representative of change in condition Unqualified staff treating a pressure injury Questionable death

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Arjan Marlo Banez and explained the purpose of the visit. On August 8, 2025, the Department received a complaint with allegation of personal rights violation resulting in R1 sustaining a pressure injury. The Department investigation consisted of review of facility and other records, observations, and interviews with pertinent individuals. Per facility records, R1 was admitted to the facility at the end of January 2025. According to physician report completed around this time, R1 did not have pressure injuries. However, records did indicate that R1 has history of skin condition or breakdown. Substantiated In addition, records indicated that R1 did not have capacity for self-care in areas including bathing, dressing, incontinent care, and medication administration. R1 was non-ambulatory, used wheelchair, and needed help with transferring, moving about facility. Also, R1 needed special observation/night supervision. Based upon further records review, there was no written record of the care R1 would be receiving in the facility. The written record of care would have included how facility would provide care to meet R1 care and observation needs. During the investigation, it was revealed that on or around June 13, 2025, R1 was observed with reddened area on tailbone (sacral area). Several facility staff, including administrator, acknowledged awareness of reddened area on R1 on June 13th, 2025. It is not indicated how long the reddened area was observed prior to June 13th , 2025. From around June 13th, 2025, until July 16, 2025, the reddened area on R1 sacral was not assessed by physician nor skilled medical professional. Facility staff acknowledged that during this time, the area was being treated with ointment, not authorized by physician or skilled medical professional. Responsible party of R1 was made aware of the “worsening” of the reddened area on July 12th, 2025. This prompted the responsible party, not facility staff, to make contact for medical assessment. When the area was assessed by medical professional on July 16th, 2025, it was found that R1 had an unstageable pressure injury. Per Title 22 regulations, "Pressure Injury" means localized damage to the skin and/or soft tissue under the skin that is usually over a bony part of the body or related to a medical or other device. This damage can appear as intact skin or an open ulcer and may be painful. It occurs as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure on the affected part of the body or pressure combined with shear (an action or stress that causes internal parts of the body to become deformed). Based on appearance and severity, the damage to tissue is a Stage 1, 2, 3, or 4 pressure injury.” Unstageable pressure injury, according to the Mayo Clinic, is “an unstageable pressure ulcer (or bedsore) is a full-thickness skin and tissue loss where the wound bed is obscured by dead, yellow, brown, or black tissue (slough or eschar), preventing healthcare providers from determining the true depth and extent of the damage until that tissue is removed. It's considered a serious injury (Stage 3 or 4)………”. Based upon Department investigation, the allegation that due to staff neglect, R1 sustained an unstageable pressure injury is substantiated. Facility staff did not ensure that R1 received the care needed and identified in facility records. R1 was admitted to facility with no pressure injuries. R1 had history of skin condition or breakdown. However, no written record of care was documented to include how facility would provide care and observation to meet R1 needs. Prior to or around June 13th, 2025, R1 developed reddened area on sacral area, but facility staff neglected to obtain appropriate assistance for care. The area continued to worsen and then R1 was diagnosed with unstageable pressure injury to the area on July 16th, 2025. A deficiency is being issued per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. A substantiated finding means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. In addition, this violation posed an immediate Health and Safety risk to resident(s) in care. An Immediate Civil Penalty of $500 is being assessed. The licensee was also informed that a civil penalty may be assessed based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099D, LIC421IM, and appeal rights were discussed and provided to the Administrator Arjan Marlo Banez. Additionally, On August 08, 2025. The department received a complaint in regards to facility staff retained a resident with a prohibited health condition. Through interviews, it was revealed R1 had an unstageable pressure injury, which is a prohibited health condition in Title 22 Regulations. The department observed the facility staff did not attempt to relocate or notify department of prohibited health condition. The finding is substantiated A deficiency is being issued per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Furthermore, on August 08, 2025 the department received a complaint regarding facility staff not notifying authorized representative of change in condition. Interviews revealed R1’s responsible party was made aware of pressure injury on 07/12/2025, however, facility staff stated R1’s responsible party was made aware of pressure injury on 06/13/2025. The department determined there is not sufficient evidence to support R1’s responsible party was informed of change in condition of R1. A deficiency is being issued per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Moreover, on August 08, 2025 the department received an additional complaint regarding untrained staff treating a pressure injury. Interviews revealed that facility staff confirmed to treating R1’s reddened area/stage wound with ointment that was not ordered from hospital or physician. Additionally, interviews and observations disclosed no documentation of turning or repositioning R1. The finding is substantiated. A deficiency is being issued per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. On August 8, 2025, the Department received a complaint with allegation of personal rights violation which contributed to R1 death/questionable death. The Department investigation consisted of review of facility and other records, observations, and interviews with pertinent individuals. R1 relocated from facility on July 18th , 2025, and subsequently passed away on August 1st , 2025. The sacral pressure injury was identified as condition contributing to R1 death. Based on the investigation, there is preponderance of evidence to support that facility staff neglected R1. Specifically, it was found that from around June 13th 2025, until July 16th, 2025, staff did not provide R1 with care and services to meet their needs. During this time, R1 sustained an unstageable pressure injury and subsequently passed away. The allegation that facility staff neglect contributed to R1 death/questionable death is substantiated. A substantiated finding means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. In addition, this violation posed an immediate Health and Safety risk to resident(s) in care. An Immediate Civil Penalty of $500 is being assessed. The licensee was also informed that a civil penalty may be assessed based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099D, LIC421IM, and appeal rights were discussed and provided to the Administrator Arjan Marlo Banez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250808100431

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 2, 2026

87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operate Facilities (a) In addition to the rights listed... (4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based upon review of facility and other records, observations, and interviews with pertinent individuals, licensee failed to ensure that R1 was provided with care, supervision, and services required. As a result, R1 sustained an unstageable pressure injury while at facility. This violation posed an immediate health and saftey risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to read over regulation with facility staff and not allow facility staff to care for any residents with prohibited health conditions.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 2, 2026

87615 Prohibited Health Conditions (a) ) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition...(1) Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interviews, the licensee did not comply with section cited above by not ensuring that R1 was relocated due to pressure injury and or notified licensing department, which poses an immediate health, saftey and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to read over regulation and to not accept residents with prohibited health care conditions without care by licensed care professional and/or notifying licensing department. POC will be cleared.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 2, 2026

87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operate Facilities (a) In addition to the rights listed... (4) To care, supervision... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: From around June 13th 2025, until July 16th, 2025, R1 was not provided care and services to meet their needs. Records revealed that R1 needed care and assistance in ADLs, including incontinent care, as well as observation with history of skin condition or breakdown. Under the care of facility staff, R1 sustained an unstageable pressure injury, and subsequently passed away. This posed an immediate risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to not admit any future residents with prohibited health conditions unless waiver is submitted to licensing department and care is provided by a licensed care professional.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: Feb 2, 2026

87466 Observation of the Resident: The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs... Based on observation and interviews, the licensee did not comply with section cited above by not ensuring R1's responsible party was notified of change of condition in R1, which poses an immediate health, saftey, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to read over regulation with facility staff on Observation of the Resident. POC will be cleared.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(d)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 2, 2026

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (d) All personnel shall be given on the job training or have related experience in the job assigned to them... (5) Knowledge necessary in order to recognize early signs of illness and the need for professional help. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews, the licensee did not comply with section cited above by not ensuring R1 received care from an appropriate skilled professional and having staff care for R1 instead, which poses an immediate health, saftey, and personal rights risk to residents in care,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to read over regulation with facility staff and acknowledged having only appropriate skilled professionals care for residents with prohibited/restricted health care conditions. POC will be cleared.

Jan 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 01/30/2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit in regards to complaint 56-AS-20250808100431. LPA met with facility staff and explained purpose of visit. During investigation of complaint, it was revealed Staff #1 (S1) was not associated to facility until 9/25/2025, however, S1 became employed several months prior to association. Additionally, Resident #1 (R1) care plan was not complete. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) (LIC809D) was discussed and provided to Administrator Arjan Marlo Banez. Along with a copy of the appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 2, 2026

87355(e)(1) Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall...facility: (1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department or This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and record review, the Administrator did not comply with section cited above by not obtaining a criminal record clearance for Staff #1 (S1) prior to working at the facility, which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to understand regulation and will ensure facility staff are background cleared prior to working at the facility. POC will be cleared.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87467(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 2, 2026

87467 Resident Participation in Decisionmaking (a) Prior to, or within two weeks of the resident’s admission, the licensee shall arrange a meeting with the resident, the resident’s representative, if any, appropriate facility staff, and a representative of the resident... Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with section cited above by not ensuring R1 had a completed care plan while living at the facility, which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to understand regulation and moving forward will ensure each resident's care plan will be completed. POC will be cleared.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Mar 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Caregiver Nenita Gorospe and was granted entry to the facility. The facility is a (5) bedroom (2) bathroom home and, with a kitchen/dining area, living room, attach garage. LPA was accompanied by Caregiver to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected client bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed Resident #4 (R4) to have a full bed rail and not currently on hospice care services or doctor ordered. Deficiency will be issued. LPA observed water temperature to test at 120 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. LPA observed toilet bowl bleach cleaner located underneath Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) bathroom sink unlocked accessible to residents in care. Deficiency will be issued. There was a designated office for client/staff files. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for clients in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of clients in care. Facility has a variety of food available for clients. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (4) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA observed incomplete Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan for Resident #3 (R3) and Resident #4 (R4). Deficiency will be issued. Additionally, LPA observed no Reappraisal forms for Resident #1 (R1), Resident #2 (R2), Resident #3 (R3), and Resident #4 (R4). Deficiency will be issued. LPA reviewed (4) resident medications. LPA Hernandez observed for Resident #2 (R2), Resident #4 (R4) and Resident #5 (R5) no documentation for daily medications in Medication Administration Record (MAR). Deficiency will be issued. Additionally for R2, R4 and R5 PRN medication was not documented correctly. Deficiency will be issued. LPA also reviewed (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. No issues observed. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809), (LIC809-D) was discussed and provided to Administrator Rea Badillo Alim. Along with copy of appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Mar 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with caregiver Rosendo Lara and was granted entry to the facility. The facility is a (5) bedroom (2) bathroom home and, with a kitchen/dining area, living room, attach garage. LPA was accompanied by Administrator Rea Badillo Alim to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected client bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated space for client/staff files. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of clients in care. Facility has a variety of food available for clients. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: Based on record review 1 out 2 dementia residents did not have an updated Physician Report. LPA also reviewed (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, one (1) Type A deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) (LIC809D) was discussed and provided to Administrator Rea Badillo Alim. Along with the appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Riverside County