Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Dela Paz Care Home
Small home·Licensed for 4·Citrus Heights, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,100
- Home sizeLicensed for 4Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitJuly 31, 2026CDSS inspection record
Dela Paz Care Home is a small care home in Citrus Heights — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 4 residents since 2019. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Dela Paz Care Home
Is Dela Paz Care Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Dela Paz Care Home licensed for?
4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Dela Paz Care Home been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.
Is Dela Paz Care Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Dela Paz Care Home cost?
$4,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,350–$5,100. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Citrus Heights that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,625 a month, and the middle figure is $4,800 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Dela Paz Care Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Dela Paz LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Mercy San Juan Medical Center is 2.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Dela Paz Care Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Dela Paz Care Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “DELA PAZ CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #342700556. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Dela Paz LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 10 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
- 0 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 31, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 4 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FOUR (4) NONAMBULATORY ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2).
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,100a month to start
Likely $3,350–$5,100
From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,100a month
Likely $3,350–$5,300
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,100likely $3,350–$5,100
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,350–$5,300
- $4,100
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,950–$8,450
- $6,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
13 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$6,000.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Comfort & CareOrangevale · 0.9 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Love You MomOrangevale · 1.0 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- All Seasons HialeahFair Oaks · 1.3 mi · Small home$9,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Creek Villa II-Res. Care Fac. for the ElderlyOrangevale · 1.5 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Splendor Oaks Senior Living #3Fair Oaks · 1.7 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Best Life Home CareCitrus Heights · 1.9 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Glorious Homes #1Citrus Heights · 2.0 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Citrus Pines Senior LivingCitrus Heights · 2.1 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- The Elderly Inn IIICitrus Heights · 2.1 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ettys' CareOrangevale · 2.2 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aaa CareCitrus Heights · 2.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Angels Assisted LivingRoseville · 2.5 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Brookdale RosevilleRoseville · 2.9 mi · Mid-size home$3,200Listed on Seniorly · memory care second person fee · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
Where it is
- 6712 Green Ash Ct, Citrus Heights, CA 95610Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 31, 2026.
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 10
- Most recent visit
- July 31, 2026
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 0
- Substantiated allegations0typical 0
- Total complaints0typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 7 of 10 documents
Jul 31, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a case management inspection and met with DSP staff, Jocelyn Lemence and Maria Rosario Parochilin. LPA spoke to Administrator Designee, Lourdes de la Paz, by phone, and stated the reason for today's inspection. The Administrator Designee confirmed there are (4) clients residing at the care home, (1) was currently attending day program, and the Administrator was unable to attend today's inspection due to not feeling well. LPA and the Administrator discussed the recent incident with client (C1), as follows: The Administrator reiterated the information emailed to LPA on 7/31/2026 (5:36 am), regarding client (C1) going to the Emergency Room last night (10:00 pm) after having an unwitnessed fall. The Administrator stated (2) staff were present when they heard a loud thud coming from (C1's) room, immediately responded and observed (C1) to be on the floor, bleeding from the top of their head. Staff immediately applied pressure to stop the bleeding, while not moving (C1) from their position, and called 9-1-1. (C1) was not able to describe to staff how they fell before going to the ER, but stated to LPA today that they were sitting on the side of their bed, facing towards the window, and then fell on the floor, hitting their head. LPA observed (C1) to be sitting upright in their bed with a bandage/s on their head. (C1) stated they are feeling good and has had no change in appetite. LPA observed (C1) to be eating lunch later during the inspection. The Administrator explained how (C1) uses a half side bed rail and sometimes reaches for items on the side table, next to their bed, "will always utilize their call button", but did not this time. (C1) was cleared for any fractures or internal bleeding, was given a prescription to apply ointment twice daily, and will follow up with their primary care physician on 8/3/2026. The facility will submit an incident report within (7) days to the Department. (C1) has not fallen before while living at the care home, and there have been no recent medication changes. It appears the facility took appropriate and timely action in seeking medical attention for (C1). There are no deficiencies issued in this report. Exit interview. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2026
Mar 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with staff, Evie Sloan, and Jocelyn Lemence, and explained purpose of inspection. Administrator, Lourdes dela Paz, and facility manager, Dennis Abadilla, arrived at 10:30 am. The facility is a level 7, vendorized by Alta California Regional Center, and is licensed for (4) non-ambulatory clients. LPA observed (2) clients in the home during the inspection and was advised (1) client was attending day program, and (1) client remains hospitalized temporarily. There are no clients currently under hospice care. LPA and Administrators toured the interior/exterior of the facility including the common areas, (4) private resident bedrooms, staff room, (2) resident bathrooms, kitchen, office, laundry area and garage. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and odor-free. Bathrooms have the necessary grab bars, non-skid flooring or shower chair, paper towels, trash can with lids and 20-second hand-washing poster. There is sufficient 2+day perishable, including fresh produce, and 7+day non-perishable supply of food. Sharps and toxins are locked in the kitchen, and medications are secured in the office. The inside temperature measured 69*F and hot water measured 116*F in the kitchen. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 8/4/25. Smoke/monoxide alarms are in working order. Resident rooms are very organized and decorated according to personal preference. All required postings and an emergency clipboard are posted in the common area. There are (2) unlocked exit gates on the outside patio and covered patio seating. LPA reviewed (2) client files. Files contain current documentation. P&I funds and medications were reviewed for (1) client. No discrepancies noted. (2) staff files reviewed- current training documentation on file. RCFE Administrator Cert #7035764740 (exp 7/12/26). LPA requested current copy of liability insurance, LIC308 and LIC500. There were no deficiencies observed. Exit interview. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2026
Dec 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a case management inspection and met with DSP staff, Eduardo Chico and Olive Jackson. Dennis Abadilla, Administrator Designee, arrived shortly and LPA stated the reason for the inspection. LPA observed (2) clients resting in the front common area, a third client resting in their room. A fourth client was attending day program. LPA and Administrator Designee discussed (2) recent incident reports submitted to the Department for client (C1) who was hospitalized on both occasions. (C1) has a renal mass on both kidneys. Client (C1) was hospitalized on November 12, 2025 after receiving results from blood work done two days prior and admitted for testing and fluid hydration. (C1) was discharged on November 16, 2025, and the facility was given instructions to continue to monitor for signs/symptoms related to the renal mass. Discussions of surgery and options most viable to (C1) are ongoing. On November 25, 2025, (C1) was taken to a follow up appointment with urology following hospitalization and for foley management. Due to having a low blood pressure reading, the Urologist recommended (C1) be evaluated further in the Emergency Room. The incident report states that upon arrival to the ER, Diagnostic procedures including an x-ray, urinalysis and blood draw were completed. Medication to increase blood pressure was administered via IV and (C1) was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for (4) days. It was determined (C1) had sepsis due to a possible infection related to the catheter. Medications were changed, including a Beta Blocker, Propranolol, which was paused at the last hospital stay. The facility will continue to monitor blood pressure 2x/day and communicate with the primary care physician (PCP). LPA reviewed blood pressure logs which document blood pressure has increased. (C1) will continue to be seen weekly by both a home health nurse and a facility nurse. The facility is awaiting a call from the PCP to schedule a follow up. There are no deficiencies issued in this report. Exit interview. Copy of report providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2025
Nov 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a case management inspection and met with DSP staff, Junald Nate and Olive Jackson. Dennis Abadilla, Administrator Designee, arrived shortly and LPA stated the reason for the inspection. LPA and the Administrator discussed an incident when (C1) was in the bathroom on November 1, 2025 (7:30 pm) and fell to the floor, face down. (S1) went to get another staff to assist when she observed blood on the right eye socket area and called another staff to assist. (C1) got up on their own and staff observed a cut on the right and left orbital. The administrators were contacted and requested staff take (C1) to to the hospital for further medical evaluation. The CT Scan showed no fractures on the head or spine; however, there was a fracture on the maxillary bone. (C1) received sutures, antibiotics and returned the same day. A follow up appointment is scheduled on November 10, 2025 to have the sutures removed and determine if a referral to the oral surgeon is needed. The administrator stated (C1) returned to day program on Monday, November 3, and has been attending all week. LPA observed (C1) return from the day program at the start of the inspection and to be ambulating fine. LPA observed the bruising on (C1's) right eye area and the administrator stated (C1) seems to be back to baseline- their appetite is okay. The administrator stated (C1) will often pretend to be fainting to get attention from staff and has also done this while being transported to day program. (C1) is now required to be in a wheelchair during transport. LPA reviewed (C1's) Individual Health Care/Nursing Plans which note "caregivers should be aware that (C1) may have sudden movements and pseudo seizures behaviors and to ensure safety from injury during these events". The administrators will review the Nursing Care Plan with all staff to reinforce what steps can be taken to minimize any injuries. The facility took immediate action in getting (C1) medically evaluated. (C1) was last injured in December 2024. There are no deficiencies issued. Exit interview. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2025
Sep 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a case management inspection and met with Evie Sloan, DSP and Dennis Abadilla, Administrator Designee. LPA stated the reason for the inspection. A case management inspection is being conducted today to follow up on (2) allegations made through a formal complaint on June 2, 2025, at a related facility. During the investigation, it was determined that the (2) staff/individuals referenced in the allegations did not work or were not present at the related facility, but at this facility. The (2) allegations and determinations are as follows: Uncleared adult(s) are present in the facility. The complaint alleged that staff (S1) was working at the facility without the required fingerprint clearances. Documentation was reviewed confirming that (S1) received a fingerprint clearance on May 1, 2024 and was associated to the facility on this same day. The allegation also stated individual (S2) who was not employed at the facility, stayed at the facility beginning in March 2025 and was not fingerprint cleared. The investigation revealed that (S2) entered the facility on/around March 10, 2025 and stayed there until as late as on/around May 18, 2025. The Administrator indicated that (S2) stayed at the facility for approximately two weeks. Staff (S3) stated (S2) was visiting the facility off and on starting on March 10, 2025. Review of department records showed that (S2) did not receive fingerprint clearance and was not associated to this facility, or any other licensed facility. Based on information obtained, this portion of the allegation is substantiated and a citation and penalties are being issued. *cont on 809C-1.. 809C-1.. Allegation: Residents were exposed to a staff member with Tuberculosis. The allegation states that individual (S2) was visiting and staying with staff (S3) and (S2) was recently discharged from the hospital for having a diagnosis of Tuberculosis (TB). The allegation states (S3) and the clients are/were possibly exposed to TB. During the investigation, LPA spoke with (2) public heath nurses in June 2025 regarding (S2) possibly being treated and hospitalized due to having TB. One nurse provided information on (S2's) TB status beginning on 5/20/25 and confirmed that (S2) was "approved to be discharged to a skilled nursing" on 5/29/25, after being hospitalized in San Diego County starting on 5/20/25. This nurse confirmed there was "no active TB" upon discharge but "(S2) has a history of TB from the Philippines" and (S2) completed all their treatments. A second public health nurse, in Sacramento County, confirmed that (S2) was in San Diego and Sacramento County was planning on seeing them again but (S2) was in the process of relocating to another area. The nurse stated that (S2) was not considered to have active TB; however, a "final determination is still needed" from her office, asserting (S2) "would not have had an active disease in March 2025" and the county was planning to see them. The nurse explained that (S2) could have had residual findings related to a positive test and "collective sputem on (S2)" which is not considered an active case. The Administrator stated (S2) is currently residing out of state and was recently hospitalized due to other medical conditions unrelated to TB. The Administrator stated that it's very common for individuals from (S2's) country of origin to test positive initially for TB after taking a Quantiferon TB test and then follow up with a chest X-ray which shows a negative result for TB. All staff and clients (4) at this facility had a TB test given from June 2025 through August 2025. All results provided showed a negative result, if not initially from the Quantiferon test, then from a follow up X-ray. (S3) was advised to have a follow up X-ray done on 6/16/25, and was not found to have active TB. Based on information obtained, this allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(d)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 11, 2025
87355 Criminal Record Clearance (d) All individuals subject to criminal record review shall be fingerprinted and sign a Criminal Record Statement (LIC 508 [Rev. 1/03]) under penalty of perjury. (3) The licensee shall submit these fingerprints to the California Department of Justice, along with a second set of fingerprints for the purpose of searching the records of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or comply with Section 87355(c), prior to the individual's employment, residence, or initial presence in the facility. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews conducted, the Licensee did not ensure that individual (S2) received a finger print clearance prior to residing at the facility, on/around March 10, 2025, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator agree to read Regulation 87355 and submit a statement of understanding. Also submit fingerprints for processing for (S2), if they plan to be present in the facility in the future. Request (S2) complete an LIC508 also prior to being present in the facility again.
Mar 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Evie Sloan, staff and Edgardo Chico, staff, and explained purpose of inspection. Administrator, Lourdes dela Paz, and facility manager, Dennis Abadilla, arrived around 10:30 am. The facility is a level 7, vendorized by Alta California Regional Center, and is licensed for (4) non-ambulatory clients. LPA observed (2) clients in the home during the inspection and was advised (2) clients were attending day program. There are no clients currently under hospice care. LPA and staff toured the interior/exterior of the facility including the common areas, (4) private resident bedrooms, staff room, (2) resident bathrooms, kitchen, office, laundry area and garage. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and odor-free. Bathrooms have the necessary grab bars, non-skid flooring or shower chair, paper towels, trash can with lids and 20-second hand-washing poster. There is sufficient 2+day perishable and 7+day non-perishable supply of food and sharps were locked in the kitchen. There are locked toxins in the laundry area and locked medications in the office. There are sufficient towels, linens/blankets/PPE/emergency supplies. The inside temperature measured 68*F and hot water measured 107*F in the kitchen. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 8/16/24. Smoke/monoxide alarms are in working order. Resident rooms are very organized and decorated according to personal preference. There are (2) evacuation clipboards posted in the common areas that contain forms required for emergencies. There are (2) unlocked exit gates on the outside patio and covered patio seating. There is a very shallow pond that is fenced in the back yard. LPA reviewed (2) of (4) client files. Files contain current individual/nursing care plans, physician's reports and other documentation. P&I funds were reviewed for (1) client- funds match documentation maintained. Medications were checked for (1) client. Orders match medications and documentation on file. (4) staff files were reviewed. Staff are completing initial/ongoing required training, including First Aid/CPR. RCFE Administrator Cert #7035764740 (exp 7/12/26). Discussed PIN 24-09 and age exception currently needed. LPA to provide additional information by email. LPA obtained current copy of liability insurance, LIC308 and LIC500. There were no deficiencies observed. Exit interview. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2025
Mar 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada and IB Investigator, Nathan Rodriguez, arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Jennifer Newell and Luz Sunga, staff, and explained purpose of inspection. Administrator, Lourdes, arrived at approximately 1:00 pm. The facility is a level 4--I home, vendorized by Alta California Regional Center, and is licensed for (4) non-ambulatory clients. LPA observed (2) clients in the home at the start of the inspection and (2) clients return from day program with staff, Edgar. There are no clients currently under hospice care. LPA and Administrator toured the interior and exterior of the facility including the common areas, (4) private resident bedrooms, staff room, (2) resident bathrooms, kitchen, office, laundry area and garage. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and odor-free and each bathroom to have the necessary grab bars, non-skid flooring or shower chair, paper towels, trash can with lids and 20-second hand-washing poster. There is sufficient 2+day perishable and 7+day non-perishable supply of food and sharps were locked in the kitchen. There are locked toxins in the laundry area and locked medications in the office. There are sufficient towels/linens/blankets/PPE/emergency supplies. The inside temperature measured 70*F and hot water measured 108*F in the kitchen. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 9/12/23 and the smoke/monoxide alarms are in working order. LPA observed locks on each client door, as required by Title 17, and there is a key for each client and a spare key for staff, if needed. There are (2) unlocked exit gates on the outside patio and covered patio seating. LPA reviewed (2) of (4) client files and found them to contain current individual/nursing care plans, physician's reports and other documentation. P&I funds were reviewed for (2) clients, found to be accurate with receipts/documentation maintained. Current copy of a surety bond was obtained. Medications orders were compared to medications being administered for (2) clients and no discrepancies were noted. (9) staff files were reviewed and found to contain current First Aid/CPR training and other required training. RCFE Administrator Cert #6041507740- exp 7/12/24.LPA observed required postings to be posted. LPA requested an updated copy of the LIC308, LIC500 be sent to CCLD by 3/22/24. Current insurance copy obtained. There are no deficiencies issued during today's inspection. Exit interview. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Sacramento County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Sugar Maple Care Home
Citrus Heights · Small home · 0.1 mi away
$3,900 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Sunrise Senior Care
Citrus Heights · Small home · 0.1 mi away
$4,350 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Elim Courte
Citrus Heights · Mid-size home · 0.3 mi away
$4,400 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Harmony Haven Care Home
Citrus Heights · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,300 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Delicate Stems for the Elderly Inc.
Citrus Heights · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$4,750 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Wholesome Elderly on Mathis
Citrus Heights · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$4,050 a month to start · Covelight estimate