Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Centinela Assisted Living Centre
Large community·Licensed for 96·Inglewood, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchairState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$3,950 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,050–$5,000
- Home sizeLicensed for 96Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit54 of 96 beds occupiedFebruary 9, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitSeptember 3, 2026CDSS inspection record
Centinela Assisted Living Centre is a large care community in Inglewood — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 96 residents since 2009. Dementia care, hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Centinela Assisted Living Centre
Is Centinela Assisted Living Centre licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Centinela Assisted Living Centre licensed for?
96 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Centinela Assisted Living Centre been cited?
1 Type A and 6 Type B citations since 2009, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 33 state visits over the same years.
Is Centinela Assisted Living Centre still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Centinela Assisted Living Centre cost?
$3,950 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,050–$5,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 121 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,094 to $5,961 a month, and the middle figure is $4,195 (n = 121 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Centinela Assisted Living Centre take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: we have not yet confirmed that an entry on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver list is this home’s. Ask the home: “Do you take the Medi-Cal Assisted Living Waiver?” The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Centinela Assisted Living Management LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Centinela Hospital Medical Center is 0.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Centinela Assisted Living Centre keep a resident on hospice?
Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”
Centinela Assisted Living Centre license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “CENTINELA ASSISTED LIVING CENTRE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197607718. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 96 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Centinela Assisted Living Management LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2009, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 33 state inspection visits since 2009, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 6 Type B citations on file since 2009, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 33 state visits in that period.
- 20 complaints and 10 substantiated allegations on file since 2009, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 36 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY LICENSED TO SERVE ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE. FACILITY IS FIRE CLEARED FOR 60 AMBULATORY AND 36 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. TOTAL COMBINED COMPACITY IS 96.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver not on file
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$3,950a month to start
Likely $3,050–$5,000
From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$3,950a month
Likely $3,050–$5,200
With a studio and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$3,950likely $3,050–$5,000
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,050–$5,200
- $3,950
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,750–$8,300
- $5,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverWe have not yet confirmed that an entry on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver list is this home’s. Ask the home: “Do you take the Medi-Cal Assisted Living Waiver?” The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
24 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,900–$8,850.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Westchester VillaInglewood · 1.0 mi · Large community$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Studio RoyaleCulver City · 5.6 mi · Large community$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at Culver CityLos Angeles · 5.7 mi · Large community$6,295Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Westmont of Culver CityCulver City · 5.8 mi · Large community$5,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Manor Rest HomeLos Angeles · 6.2 mi · Large community$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunrise Assisted Living of Hermosa BeachHermosa Beach · 6.3 mi · Large community$9,150Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Nazareth HouseLos Angeles · 6.5 mi · Large community$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Spring Senior Assisted LivingTorrance · 7.6 mi · Large community$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Huntington Retirement HotelTorrance · 7.6 mi · Large community$3,650Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunny Hills Assisted Living (Memory Care)Los Angeles · 7.8 mi · Large community$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- The Plaza at WestwoodLos Angeles · 8.0 mi · Large community$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Garden Silver TownLos Angeles · 8.1 mi · Large community$2,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakmont of Beverly HillsBeverly Hills · 8.5 mi · Large community$8,795Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Pinnacles at BurtonLos Angeles · 8.6 mi · Large community$4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunrise of Beverly HillsBeverly Hills · 8.7 mi · Large community$10,822Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Leonard on Beverly A Clearwater CommuniLos Angeles · 8.7 mi · Large community$8,240Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Hayworth TerraceLos Angeles · 8.8 mi · Large community$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Brookdale Ocean HouseSanta Monica · 9.0 mi · Large community$7,065Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- City View LaLos Angeles · 9.0 mi · Large community$6,000Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Commonwealth Royale Guest HomeLos Angeles · 9.1 mi · Large community$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Coral Oaks Care LivingLynwood · 9.2 mi · Large community$1,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmont Village WestwoodLos Angeles · 9.3 mi · Large community$11,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Welbrook Senior Living Santa MonicaSanta Monica · 9.3 mi · Large community$10,200Listed on Seniorly · memory care studio · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Carson Senior Assisted LivingCarson · 9.3 mi · Large community$3,300Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 1000 S Flower St, Inglewood, CA 90301Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 37 documents for this home, and its records count 33 visits since 2009. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 21, 2026.
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 33
- Most recent visit
- September 3, 2026
- Occupied · February 9, 2026 visit
- 54 of 96 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 25 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 16, 2021 to February 9, 2026. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (12), “Unsubstantiated” (13). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 25 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations1typical 0
- Type B citations6typical 1
- Substantiated allegations10typical 2
- Total complaints20typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2009.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 5 of 37 documents
May 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mario Leon conducted an unannounced required 1- year visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. California Department of Social Services (CDSS) met with Social Worker Elizabeth Hernandez and explained the purpose of today's Annual Inspection. CDSS verified the facility has an approved mitigation plan report and infection control plan. The facility currently has 46 residents in placement. The facility is licensed to serve elderly residents aged 60 and above. The fire clearance is for 60 ambulatory and 36 non-ambulatory residents. CDSS verified five staff fingerprints that were cleared and associated with the facility. The facility is a single-story business building located in a residential neighborhood. CDSS and Lead Maintenance Antonio Molina toured the facility's main office/receptionist areas, administrator office, medication room, nurse station, dining room, break room, kitchen, male and female's restrooms, public restrooms, activity room, laundry room located on the other side of the parking lot, patios, shaded area, and indoor/outdoor activity areas. During the visit bedrooms and bathrooms were observed. Documents have been diligently posted as mandated on the wall in the receptionist areas, nurse station, dining room, break room, and hallways. The following Title 22 regulated areas were audited and found to be in compliance: Bedrooms #52, #57/58/59, #37/38/39, #27 & #2 contain the required furniture, and bathrooms are clean and operational. Personal accommodations were observed for safety, privacy, and comfort, including the provision of non-skid surface mats. The kitchen was observed for its ability to prepare and serve food. The food service was reviewed for appropriate quantity and proper storage; there was an ample supply of perishable and nonperishable food. The resident’s medications were reviewed for proper storage, documentation, and PCC system implementation. Medications are securely locked in the medication room, records are current and up to date. Report continues, please see LIC809-C. Common areas observed for the ability to safely serve the needs of the residents, including cleanliness, and clear of any potential hazards to the residents. The first aid kit is fully stocked with manual, smoke, and carbon monoxide detectors were in compliance, the hot water temperature was measured within normal limits in the main building at , and in the bungalows as follows: #52 at 110.6°F (degrees Fahrenheit), #57/58/59 at 112.3°F, #37/38/39 at 116°F, #2 at 111.9°F and #27 at 113.2°F (all rooms are within the range of 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit). The fire extinguishers are fully charged, adequate linen supply, and the facility's telephones are tested and found to be in working order. All exit doors were found to be in compliance, the yard was free of debris hazards, and trash cans were covered. All five staff members have undergone training on reporting dependent adult and elder abuse and were presented with an alternate form of Physician's Health Assessment (LIC503). During today's inspection, there were no deficiencies observed. Therefore, there have been zero deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was held with Elizabeth Hernandez - Social Services Worker and a copy of this report has been provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2026
Feb 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are trying to force residents to use the facility physician
On February 09, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pamela Bunker conducted an initial visit to gather information regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Raniyah Thomas and Joseph Daniel Tampoya, Medical Technician, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA was granted entry to the facility. The Administrator Meshulem Weiss arrived later to assist with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On February 09,2026, LPA Bunker requested, reviewed, and obtained copies of the following documents: Personnel Report (dated 02/09/20256), Resident Roster (dated 02/09/2026) Admission Agreement (dated 05/09//2025), Identification and Emergency Information (dated 05/15/2025), Physician’s Report (dated 07/08/2025), Medical Assessment (dated 07/08/2025), Medication Administration Records (MARs) (02/09/2026 - present), Appraisal & Needs and Services Plan (dated 05/15/2025), Resident Appraisal Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (05/15/2025), Functional Capability Assessment (dated 11/20/2025), Preplacement Appraisal Information (dated 05/15/2025), and House Rules (dated 05/09/2025), See continued LIC9099-C, page 2. Unsubstantiated Continued LIC9099-C page 2 Personal Rights (dated 05/15/2025), Consent Forms (dated 05/15/2025, Resident personal Property and Valuables (dated 05/15/2025). Interviews were conducted with Staff Members #1 through #4 (S1–S4) as well as with Residents #1 through #6 (R1–R6). Investigation revealed the following. Allegation: Staff are trying to force residents to use the facility physician. On 02/09/2026, between 10:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., LPA Bunker conducted interviews with staff members #1–#4 (S1–S4). 4 out of 4 staff members stated that the facility does not force residents to use the facility’s physician. 4 out of 4 staff stated residents are allowed to choose their own primary care physicians, and responsible parties are informed of this option. 4 out of 4 staff members stated that the facility provides an in-house physician for residents who prefer not to leave the facility for outside medical appointments. However, residents maintain the right to keep their personal physicians. 4 out of 4 staff members stated that a majority of residents choose the convenience of the in-house physician, who visits the facility three times per month. 4 out of 4 staff members confirmed that residents have never complained about their physicians providing care at the facility. They emphasized that staff do not pressure or coerce residents to use the facility’s physician. Each staff member denied the allegation. 4 out of 4 staff members confirmed that residents have never complained about their physician's choice or the care that is being provided at the facility. They emphasized that staff do not pressure or coerce residents to use the facility’s physician. Each staff member denied the allegation. Based on interviews and information gathered, there is no evidence to support the allegation that staff force residents to use the facility's physician. Residents retain the right to choose their own medical providers. See continued LIC9099-C – Page 2 Continued LIC9099-C page 3 On 02/09/2026, between 10:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., LPA Bunker interviewed residents #1–#6 (R1–R6). 6 out of 6 stated that facility staff does not force them to use the facility’s physician. 4 out of 6 residents stated they are allowed to choose their own primary care physicians. 2 out of 6 residents stated they are veterans and receive medical care both at the facility and through the VA Hospital. 3 out of 6 residents stated they chose to use the in-house physician, who visits the facility three times per month. 3 out of 6 residents stated their responsible parties were informed of this option and agreed with their decision. 3 out of 6 residents stated that they have no responsible parties or family contacts; they are independent and make their own healthcare decisions. 6 out of 6 residents denied the allegation. Based on interviews, available evidence, observation, information received, and records reviewed there was not enough sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. There were no deficiencies cited. A copy of the Complaint Investigation Report LIC9099 and LIC9099-Cs was provided to Raniyah Thomas, Administrator. An exit interview was conductedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2026 · control 11-AS-20260202081551
May 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pamela Bunker conducted an unannounced required 1- year visit with the primary focus on Infection Control measures and using the new CARE Inspection Tool. LPA Bunker met with Administrator Gwen Craig and Social Worker Elizabeth Hernandez and explained the purpose of today's Annual Inspection. LPA Bunker verified the facility has an approved mitigation plan report and infection control plan. The facility currently has 57 residents in placement. The facility is licensed to serve elderly residents aged 60 and above. The fire clearance is for 60 ambulatory and 36 non-ambulatory residents. LPA Bunker verified five staff fingerprints that were cleared and associated with the facility. The facility's annual fees are current. 12 Domains in the Infection Control Practices will be observed and reviewed. "I will be using this tool and methods that have been developed to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the Department of Social Services' facility inspections." The above facility is a single-story business building located in a residential neighborhood. LPA Bunker and Administrator Gwen Craig toured the facility's main office/receptionist areas, administrator office, medication room, nurse station, dining room, break room, kitchen, male and female's restrooms, public restrooms, activity room, hair salon, bar shop, janitor closet, storage closet, storage units, laundry room located on the other side of the parking lot, patios, shaded area, and indoor/outdoor activity areas. During the visit bedrooms and bathrooms #2, #5, #8, #9, #15, #16, #20, #21, #38, #39, #43, #43, #44, #52, #54, and #55 were observed. See continued LIC809-C page 2. Continued LIC809-C page 2 Documents have been diligently posted as mandated on the wall in the receptionist areas, nurse station, dining room, break room, and hallways. The following Title 22 regulated areas were audited and found to be in compliance: Bedrooms contain the required furniture, and bathrooms are clean and operational. Personal accommodations were observed for safety, privacy, and comfort, including the provision of non-skid surface mats. The kitchen was observed for its ability to prepare and serve food. The food service was reviewed for appropriate quantity and proper storage; there was an ample supply of perishable and nonperishable food. The resident’s medications were reviewed for proper storage, documentation, and PCC system implementation. Medications are securely locked in the medication room, records are current and up to date. Common areas observed for the ability to safely serve the needs of the residents, including cleanliness, and clear of any potential hazards to the residents. The first aid kit is fully stocked with manual, smoke, and carbon monoxide detectors were in compliance, the hot water temperature was measured within normal limits in the main building at (105), and in the bungalows as follows: #1 at 108, #2 at 107, and #3 at 110 degrees Fahrenheit (within the range of 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit). The fire extinguishers are fully charged, adequate linen supply, and the facility's telephones are tested and found to be in working order, The resident's bedroom windows have no sliding window lock with thumbscrews, all exit doors were found to be in compliance, the yard was free of debris hazards, and trash cans were covered. Staff members have undergone training on reporting dependent adult and elder abuse. The facility conducted a fire drill on May 12, 2025 LPA Bunker provided Administrator Gwen Craig with a copy of the facility evaluation reports. There were no deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2025
Jan 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are financially abusing residents in care.
The department conducted an unannounced complaint visit on Monday, January 06, 2025, Upon arrival at the facility, The department conducted a risk assessment. Based on the evaluation, the facility is clear of COVID-19 infection. The department met with Administrator Gwen Craig and explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews were conducted with staff members S1-S2 and residents 1-6 (R1-R6). Residents' records were requested and reviewed. The department requested and reviewed the resident's records and asked for copies of the following documents: Personnel report, Resident Roster, Admission Agreement, Identification and Emergency Information, Physician's Report, Medical Assessment, Medication Administration Records (MARs), Medication Logs, Consent Forms, Functional Capability Assessment, Safeguards for Cash Resources, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Appraisal and Needs Service Plan, Individual Program Plan (IPP), and Citibank bank statements and deposits. See continued LIC9099-C page 2 Unsubstantiated Continue LIC9099-C page 2 Allegation: Staff are financially abusing residents in care. S1-S2 and R1-R6 stated that the staff is not financially abusing residents in care. R1-R6 stated they received all their funds and had no complaints about their money or being financially abused by staff. S1-S2 stated that the facility is the payee for 12 residents, and their Social Security checks are sent directly to the facility's business office, where the checks are deposited into the Citibank account. S1 stated she is only responsible for issuing Personal and Incidental (P&I) funds to the 12 residents, who sign off on the amount they receive. S1-S2 and R1-R6 denied the allegation. The investigation revealed the following: Interviews were conducted with staff members 1 and 2 (S1-S2) and residents 1 through 6 (R1-R6). All individuals interviewed stated that the allegation did not occur. S1-S2 and R1-R6 stated that staff safeguard residents’ cash resources and personal property. S1-S2 and R1-R6 stated that neither the administrator nor the facility social worker is stealing money from the residents. S1-S2 and R1-R6 also reported that staff are not removing funds from residents’ bank accounts or altering records to conceal any such actions. S1-S2 stated that residents’ funds are not being taken for personal use and later returned to the accounts. S1-S2 and R1-R6 stated that residents are not complaining about not receiving their monthly payments. According to S1, the facility is the payee for 12 residents, and their checks are deposited into Citibank by the business office, not by the administrator or the social worker. S1-S2 also stated that neither the administrator nor the social worker deposits residents’ checks. A review of the bank statements for the 12 residents for whom the facility serves as payees indicated that all Personal and Incidental P&I funds are being distributed as required. The residents’ bank records appeared accurate during the investigation. S1-S2 stated that the facility adheres to Title 22 Regulations. Based on the department Interviews with S1-S2 and R1-R6, as well as a review of relevant documents, the department did not have sufficient information or documents to substantiate the allegation. Both staff and residents denied the claim. Based on interviews, available evidence, observation, information received, and records reviewed there was not enough sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. There were no deficiencies cited. An exit interview conductedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 6, 2025 · control 11-AS-20240415104646
May 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pamela Bunker conducted an unannounced required 1- year visit with the primary focus on Infection Control measures and using the new CARE Inspection Tool. Upon arrival at the facility, LPA Bunker conducted a risk assessment. Based on the assessment, the facility is clear of COVID-19 infection. LPA was properly screened for COVID-19 symptoms and temperature was checked. LPA Bunker met with Administrator Gwen Craig and explained the purpose of today's Annual Inspection. LPA Bunker verified that the facility has an approved mitigation plan report and infection control plan. The facility's annual fees are current. 12 Domains in the Infection Control Practices will be observed and reviewed. "I will be using this tool and methods that have been developed to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the Department of Social Services' facility inspections." The above facility is a single-story business building located in a residential neighborhood. LPA Bunker and Administrator Gwen Craig toured the facility's main office/receptionist area, administrator office, medication room, nurse station, dining room, break room, kitchen, male and female's restrooms, public restrooms, activity room, hair salon, janitor closet, storage closet, laundry room located on the other side of the parking lot, patios, shaded area, and indoor/outdoor activity areas. During the visit bedrooms and bathrooms #7, #9, #15, #16, #30, #31, #38, #39, #43, #44, #53, #54, and #59 were observed. See continued LIC809-C page Continued LIC809-C page 2 Documents have been diligently posted as mandated on the wall in the receptionist area, nurse station, dining room, break room, and hallway. The following Title 22 regulated areas were audited and found to be in compliance: Bedrooms contain the required furniture, and bathrooms are clean and operational. Personal accommodations were observed for safety, privacy, and comfort, including the provision of non-skid surface mats. The kitchen was observed for its ability to prepare and serve food. The food service was reviewed for appropriate quantity and proper storage; there was an ample supply of perishable and nonperishable food. The resident’s medications were reviewed for proper storage, documentation, and system implementation. Medications are securely locked in the medication room, records are current and up to date. Common areas observed for the ability to safely serve the needs of the residents, including cleanliness, and clear of any potential hazards to the residents. The first aid kit is fully stocked with manual, smoke, and carbon monoxide detectors were in compliance, the hot water temperature was measured within normal limits at 120 degrees Fahrenheit (within the range of 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit). The fire extinguishers are fully charged, adequate linen supply, and the facility's telephones are tested and found to be in working order, The resident's bedroom windows have no sliding window lock with thumbscrews, all exit doors were found to be in compliance, the yard was free of debris hazards, and trash cans were covered. Staff members have undergone training on reporting dependent adult and elder abuse. The facility conducted a fire drill on May 14, 2024. Due to time constraints and technical difficulties, LPA Bunker will return at a later date to conclude the visit. There were no deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Butterfly Love Residential Care Home
Inglewood · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$5,400 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Westchester Villa
Inglewood · Large community · 1.0 mi away
$4,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
Augustine Family Elder Care
Inglewood · Small home · 1.1 mi away
$6,350 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Alabaster Elderly Care
Inglewood · Small home · 1.3 mi away
$5,150 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Caring Hands Hope House
Inglewood · Small home · 1.6 mi away
$5,400 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Rich Residential Care
Los Angeles · Small home · 1.8 mi away
$4,650 a month to start · Covelight estimate