Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Cambrian Senior Living

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Jose, California

Licensed since 2022Licence #435202854
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedMay 10, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJanuary 2, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderSilver Generations LLCSince 2022 · 3 licensed homes

Cambrian Senior Living is a small care home in San Jose — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2022.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Cambrian Senior Living

Is Cambrian Senior Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Cambrian Senior Living licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Cambrian Senior Living been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Cambrian Senior Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Cambrian Senior Living cost?

$4,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 23 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Jose that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,525 to $4,875 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Cambrian Senior Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Silver Generations LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Silver Generations LLC — at least 4 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Children's Healthcare Organization of Northern California - Pediatric Hospital is 0.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Cambrian Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Cambrian Senior Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “CAMBRIAN SENIOR LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #435202854. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Silver Generations LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is January 2, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM 3. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,900a month to start

Likely $4,000–$6,050

From 23 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,900a month

Likely $4,000–$6,200

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,900likely $4,000–$6,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 23 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,200
$4,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,700–$9,300
$6,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 23 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

23 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,600–$5,650.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 23 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 3520 May Lane, San Jose, CA 95124Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 2, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
9
Most recent visit
January 2, 2026
Occupied · May 10, 2024 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated December 12, 2022 to May 10, 2024. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020251102024230202311020222202021110

The last 36 months — 5 of 9 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Required - 1 Year visit and met with Administrator Azarel James Equing. During visit, LPA toured the facility inside and out. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed there to be locked storage areas for sharp objects and cleaning supplies. LPA observed the refrigerator and food storage areas and observed there to be a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. LPA toured six out of six bedrooms. Each bedroom had working lights and available bedding and clothing storage areas. LPA toured the outside area and found the exits to be clear of obstructions. LPA tested the smoke detectors in each resident bedroom and in the hallways. All smoke detectors functioned properly when tested. LPA tested the carbon monoxide detector in the kitchen and it functioned properly when tested. LPA toured two out of two resident bathrooms. Each bathroom had working lights and available soap and paper towels. The water temperatures in the bathroom sinks were 111 F. See LIC809-C page for more information. Page 1 of 2. LPA reviewed the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Logs and Resident Records for 5 out of 5 residents and found them to be complete. LPA reviewed 5 staff records and found them to be complete. The emergency disaster drill log indicates that the last recorded drill was on 10/15/2025. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. LPA Marrufo requests that the following documents be updated and copies sent to the department by 01/09/2026: LIC500 Personnel Summary LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility Liability Insurance Current Administrator's Certificate LIC610 Emergency Disaster Plan This report was reviewed with Administrator Azarel James Equing and a copy of this report was provided. Page 2 of 2. END REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 2, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jan 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced annual inspection, and met with Administrator (ADM) James Equing . License, Personal Rights posters, and Administrator Certificate were observed at entrance. LPA observed 4 staff and 6 residents in the facility. LPA reviewed 3 residents files (R1 - R3) and 3 staff files (S1 - S3). 2 Out of 3 residents (R1 and R3) centrally stored medication forms were observed not matching with their medication counts. LPA toured the facility with ADM inside and out. LPA inspected living room, kitchen, dining area, 2 sitting areas, and laundry room. There are 6 single rooms for residents, and one staff live-in room in facility. 3 bathrooms were inspected. Two days perishable foods and seven nonperishable foods were observed sufficient. The temperature of the refrigerator was observed at 16 degree F, and the temperature of the freezer was observed at -1 degree F. Room temperature was observed at 72 degree F. Hot water was observed at 117 degree F. Medication cabinet, and knife closet, were observed locked. Dish washing solution bottle was observed on the top of sink in the kitchen, ADM locked the dish washing solution bottle in the closet under the sink immediately. ADM stated staff just finished using the dish washing solution after lunch. LPA checked the call bell system in resident rooms and it was functional. Door alarms were observed installed at the exit doors. First Aid box, flash lights, and night lights were observed in the facility. LPA observed 6 beds in the resident rooms with half bed rails. ADM provided 6 residents' physician reports. 1 Out 6 residents is on hospice care, and 5 Out of 6 residents having physician orders for using half bed rail. Continue on LIC809-C. The facility's last time conducted the fire drill was on 1/7/2025. Front yard and back yard were inspected. LPA observed a tree's branches blocked half of the walkway to the exit. Staff trimmed the tree branches before LPA completed the visit. No obstruction was observed to block the walkway after staff had trimmed the tree.. Deficiency noted today. See LIC809-D. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM for signature. A copy of this report was provided to ADM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2025
20242 state visits · 3 documents
May 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not seek medical attention for resident with lice.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced invetigation visit to deliver the amended investigation finding report and met with House Manager (HM) Azarel James Equing. On 10/02/2023, the Department received a complaint with the allegation that the facility staff did not seek medical attention for resident with lice. On 10/12/2023, the Department conducted an initial investigation visit. LPA interviewed Licensee, Administrator, 2 staff and 2 residents. LPA toured the facility and checked the 2 residents with staff. LPA request the resident physician report and Apprsial/Need and service plan. Continue on LIC9099-C. Page 1 of 3. Unsubstantiated Facility staff did not seek medical attention for resident with lice: On 10/02/2023, LPA interviewed resident R1's family (FM). FM stated he/she went to the facility to visit R1 every week. FM stated he/she did not know R1 had lice. FM stated the facility did not notify him/her that R1 had lice. FM stated R1 moved out from the facility on 9/23/2023 and moved to another facility. FM stated on 9/25/2023 he/she received a phone call from the new facility that R1 had lice and it took 7 days to develop to the current condition of lice. On 10/12/2023, LPA interviewed 2 staff (S1, S2). S1 and S2 stated they did not know R1 had lice. Both stated residents have two showers per week and some residents have bed bath every day if the resident cannot take shower. Both stated the facility staff clean resident bedrooms every day and residents have laundry every day with or without mix of residents' clothes. Both stated the facility cleans resident Iinens 1-2 times per week. Both stated resident R1 moved out from the facility because R1's needed higher level of care. LPA interviewed Licensee (LCN). LCN stated R1 moved out from the facility because he/she needed higher level of care. LCN stated he/she received a phone call from R1's family that R1 had lice after R1 moved out from the facility two days after. LCN stated after he/she received the notice, he/she spoke to the facility staff and residents. LCN denied the facility had lice. LCN stated R1 went to day program, R1 might get lice from being outside in the community. LPA toured the facility including the common area, bathrooms and 6 resident bedrooms. LPA did not observe the sign of lice on residents. LPA interviewed Administrator (ADM). ADM stated the residents have 2 showers per week and as needed, have laundry every day and the facility changes resident's linens every week. ADM stated he/she did not receive any report from staff that R1 having lice. Continue on LIC9099-C. page 2 of 3. On 6/14/2024, LPA conducted a collateral visit at a licensed facility where R1 is currently residing to interview R1. R1 was unable to communicate due to neurocognitive disorders. LPA interviewed a staff S3. S3 stated he/she went to R1's day program to conduct a pre-assessment a week prior to 9/23/2023, the day R1 moved in to the new facility. S3 stated he/she did not find R1 had lice during the pre-assessment.. LPA interviewed 4 staff. 4 out of 4 staff stated R1 moved in the facility on 9/23/2023, and the facility staff found R1 had lice on 9/25/2023. LPA interviewed a staff S4. S4 stated the facility staff found R1 had lice on 9/25/2023, and notified R1's day program. S4 stated R1's day program staff stated that they did not find R1 had lice and the day program did not have any one with lice. Reviewed R1's resident notes, on 9/25/23, staff found R1 scratching head and lice noted in multiple areas of the head. The facility shampooed R1, and gave shower to R1. Based on the observation, records reviewed, and interviews, there was no lice found before 9/25/2023. ADM and LNS denied R1 had lice before 9/23/2023, R1's day program also denied R1 had lice before 9/23/2023. R1 moved to the new residency facility on 9/23/2023. There is no evidence to indicate that facility staff did not seek medical attention for resident with lice. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interviews and observation, the department has found the above allegations is unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened and/or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to show the alleged violations did or did not occur. No citation noted today per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview was conducted with HM. This report was provided to HM for signature. A copy of the report was provided to HM. Page 3 of 3.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2024 · control 26-AS-20231002142714
May 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not addressing an insect infestation at the facility. Staff are not following proper food services sanitation practices.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced investigation visit to deliver the amended investigation report and met with Administrator (ADM) Justin Ladwig. On 01/16/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 01/26/2024, an initial investigation visit was conducted. LPA interviewed the House Manager, 2 staff, 5 residents, a private caregiver, and a nurse. LPA obtained LIC500 personnel report, the facility cleaning schedule and the facility infection control plan/protocol. Continue on LIC9099-C. Page 1 of 3.. Unsubstantiated Staff are not addressing an insect infestation at the facility: On 1/26/2024, at 1:00PM, LPA arrived at the facility. Staff S1 opened the door for LPA. LPA toured the kitchen and the facility with S1. LPA observed dishes in the kitchen sink. S1 stated he/she and another staff just finished helping residents for lunch and was washing dishes when LPA arrived. LPA did not observe insects, cockroaches, ants on the kitchen counter or on the kitchen floor. LPA did not observe any "insect trap" on the kitchen counter or on the floor. LPA toured the dining room, living room, reading rooms, laundry room, resident rooms and restrooms. LPA did not observe insects, cockroaches, ants or any "insect traps". LPA interviewed house manager (HM). HM stated the facility had cockroaches around in the middle of last year. HM stated the facility conducted treatment for that. HM stated the facility does not have insect, cockroaches, or ants after the treatment. HM stated he/she did not see insects, cockroaches, or ants recently. HM stated facility staff clean the facility in the morning and in the evening every day. HM stated the facility staff clean the kitchen before and after each meal. LPA interviewed 2 staff (S1, S2). both staff stated the facility staff clean the facility in the morning and evening every day, and the staff clean the kitchen before and after the meals. Both stated they did not see insects, cockroaches or ants in the facility recently. LPA interviewed 5 residents. 5 out of 5 residents stated the facility is clean. 3 out of 5 residents stated they did not see insects, cockroaches, or ants in the facility. LPA interviewed a private caregiver (PC). PC stated the facility is clean and the food is good. PC stated he/she does not see the facility has any problem. LPA interviewed a nurse at the facility. The nurse stated the facility everything is good and clean. The nurse stated the facility is the top level of the facilities he/she ever visited. Based on the interviews with staff and residents and observation, no evidence to indicate that staff are not addressing an insect infestation at the facility. Continue on LIC9099-C. Page 2 of 3. Staff are not following proper food services sanitation practices: On 01/26/2024, LPA toured the facility kitchen. LPA did not observe insects, cockroaches, ants, or "insect traps" on the kitchen counter. LPA interviewed 3 staff. 3 out of 3 staff stated they did not see insects, cockroaches, or ants in the facility. 3 out of 3 staff stated the facility staff clean the kitchen before to cook meals and clean the kitchen after the meals. LPA interviewed a facility cook, he/she stated he/she did not put "insect trap" on the kitchen counter. LPA interviewed a resident R1 who stated the facility staff prepare their meals in good sanitation practices. LPA interviewed 5 residents. 5 out 5 residents stated the facility food was good. 5 out of 5 residents stated the facility has no insects or bugs and the kitchen is clean. LPA interviewed a private caregiver on site and a home care nurse on site in the facility. Both stated the facility food is good. Both stated they did not find any issue of the procedures of the facility food processing for the meals. On 6/14/2024, LPA interviewed 4 staff. 4 out of 4 stated they received the training for food preparation and food processing. 2 out of 4 staff addressed the procedures of food preparation and food processing for cooking the meals. LPA obtained and reviewed the facility Food Safety Best Practices documents. ADM stated the Food Safety Best Practice document is the guideline for staff to follow. Based on the observation, records reviewed and interviews with staff and residents, there is no evidence to indicate that the facility staff are not following proper food services sanitation practice. The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on interviews and observation, the department has found the above allegations are unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened and/or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to show the alleged violations did or did not occur. No citation noted today per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM for signature. A copy of the report was provided to ADM. Page 3 of 3.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240116100529
Jan 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced annual inspection, and met with Administrator (ADM) Justin Ladwig . License, Personal Rights posters, and Administrator Certificate were observed at entrance. LPA observed 3 staff and 5 residents in the facility. LPA reviewed 3 residents files and 3 staff files. LPA toured the facility with ADM inside and out. LPA inspected living room, kitchen, dining area, 2 reading rooms, and laundry room. There are 6 single rooms for residents, and one staff live-in room in facility. 3 bathrooms were inspected. Grabs and non-skid mats were observed in the bathrooms. Two days perishable foods and seven nonperishable foods were observed sufficient. Room temperature was observed at 72 degree F. Hot water was observed at 119 degree F. Medication cabinet, Knife closet, and cleaning products closet were observed locked. LPA checked the call bell in resident room and the staff responded in 2 minutes. First Aid box, flash lights were observed in the facility. Front yard and back yard were inspected. No obstruction was observed to block the walkway. ADM stated the last date that the facility conducted the emergency drill was 1/12/2024. Deficiency noted today. See LIC809-D. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM for signature. A copy of this report was provided to ADM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Silver Generations LLC, licensed since 2022, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Santa Clara County