Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Best Care Assisted Living on Haskell

Small home·Licensed for 6·North Hills, California

Licensed since 2024Licence #197610506Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileDementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,400 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,600–$5,450
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedMay 7, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitMay 7, 2026CDSS inspection record

Best Care Assisted Living on Haskell is a small care home in North Hills — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2024. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Best Care Assisted Living on Haskell

Is Best Care Assisted Living on Haskell licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Best Care Assisted Living on Haskell licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Best Care Assisted Living on Haskell been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Best Care Assisted Living on Haskell still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Best Care Assisted Living on Haskell cost?

$4,400 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,600–$5,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Best Care Assisted Living on Haskell take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Best Care Assisted Living on Haskell, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Mission Community Hospital is 2.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Best Care Assisted Living on Haskell keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Best Care Assisted Living on Haskell license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BEST CARE ASSISTED LIVING ON HASKELL”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197610506. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Best Care Assisted Living on Haskell, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORIES WHERE ONE (1) CAN BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #4. WAIVER/ GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS. DEMENTIA AND BEDRIDDEN PLAN SUBMITTED.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,400a month to start

Likely $3,600–$5,450

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,400a month

Likely $3,600–$5,650

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,400likely $3,600–$5,450

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,600–$5,650
$4,400
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,200–$8,750
$6,400
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,750.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 9756 Haskell Ave, North Hills, CA 91343Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2024, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2024. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 7, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2024
State visits
7
Most recent visit
May 7, 2026
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated December 30, 2025 to May 7, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020253402024220

The last 36 months — 7 of 7 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
May 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belogings.

At 12:00pm LPA, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina, conducted an unannounced complaint visit in response to the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. At 12:05pm, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At 12:10pm, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Admission Agreement, Physicians Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, Theft and Loss Policy, Staff Training, etc. relevant to the investigation. At approximately 12:20pm, LPA conducted a physical plant tour. Between 12:30am – 2:30pm, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator, two (2) staff and six (6) residents. Continue on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. It was alleged that R1 was hospitalized in December 2025 and subsequently transferred to a rehabilitation on 12/05/2025, where R1 remained until 03/20/2026, and the staff did not safeguard R1’s personal belongings. LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator, who denied the allegation and stated that R1 has a history of reporting missing items at various times. Administrator reported that the facility made arrangements for R1 to pick up belongings and requested that law enforcement be present to ensure transparency and safety during the process. According to the Administrator, R1 refused to participate in the police accompanied pick-up and allowed the Administrator to video the process of collecting some or all of their belongings. Staff interviewed confirmed the statement provided by the Administrator and stated that they do not recall an instance of R1’s personal items being mishandled or lost while stored at the facility. Staff confirmed that some belongings were stored in boxes, due to R1’s extended absence but stated they were maintained in R1's room #1, which was kept locked during that time. All six (6) residents interviewed denied having any issues with staff safeguarding their belongings. Each resident stated they had never experienced missing personal property, and they had not observed staff mishandling or misplacing items/belongings of the residents. Lastly, LPA was provided with pictures of R1's room and observed, multiple empty bottles and gloves, cream, coins, trash, etc. on the floor. R1's bed was piled up with purses, hangers and various items. LPA was informed that R1 refused to comply with the facility house rules and did not allow staff to clean their room. Therefore, based on interviews and information gathered this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated, at this time. No deficiency issued during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260430120837
20253 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff over medicated a resident contributed to residents death. Staff did not keep facility free of an illegal substance. Staff placed a resident on hospice without authorization.

On 12.30.2025 at 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda arrived at this facility to conduct an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to deliver the final determination of the above-noted allegations. LPA was granted entry into the facility by the staff #1 (S1) and explained the reason for the visit. An entrance interview was conducted. At the time of this visit, at approximately 9:10 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. LPA did not observe any immediate health and safety issues. To investigate the allegations, prior to the initial visit on 4.7.2025, LPA Ngo-Castaneda subpoenaed medical records from the hospital. Continue to LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated On 04/08/25, LPA Ngo-Castaneda conducted an initial complaint visit at which time, at approximately 10:19 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. From 12:30 PM – 1:30 PM, LPA interviewed three (3) staff members present in the facility and five (5) residents. At 11:00 AM, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which included, but not limited to Physician’s report, Admission Agreement, Staff Training, LIC 500, resident roster, needs and service plan, and other relevant documents to the investigation. Before this visit on 4.7.2025, LPA reviewed the documents previously gathered from the facility. Allegation #1: Staff over medicated a resident contributed to resident’s death. It was alleged that facility staff over-medicated resident #1 (R1), resulting/contributing in their death. LPA interviewed five (5) residents on 4.8.2025, and it was revealed that residents do not have any issues with staff over medicating anyone at the facility. During interviews with staff, it was revealed that all medications are given as prescribed. LPA reviewed R1’s medical records, which revealed that on 3.21.2025, no drug overdose was found in R1's system. R1’s death was due to ‘cardiac arrest’ on 4.1.2025. Based on interviews and record review, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation #2: Staff did not keep the facility free of an illegal substance. It was alleged that the facility kept an illegal substance that R1 took and consumed. During LPA Ngo-Castaneda facility plant tour, medication review, and observation, LPA did not observe any ‘illegal substance’ in the facility. During interviews with staff, it was revealed that all medications are given as prescribed. All of the staff confirmed that no one uses or sells drugs in the facility. During interviews with residents, all interviewed residents stated that they were given their medications as prescribed. Residents revealed no occurrences of illegal drug use or sales in the facility. Based on interviews and record review, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Continue to LIC 9099-C Allegation #3: Staff placed a resident on hospice without authorization. It was alleged that R1 was placed on hospice care without their consent. LPA phone interview with R1 family at 12:15 PM on 4.8.2025 revealed that R1’s family was aware of what they signed and was advised on the services that hospice will provide. LPA interview with staff revealed that R1 was admitted at the facility on 1.17.2025. Before being admitted to the facility, R1's family signed and agreed to R1 to receive hospice care. R1’s hospice care was approved by Circle of Life Hospice coverage on 1.01.2025. Based on the information provided and record review, the allegation is deemed to be UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health or safety hazards were observed during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250404163531
Dec 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

In conjunction with the complaint investigation, (complaint number # 31-AS-20250404163531), Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted a case management visit to address the deficiencies unrelated to the complaint. During the complaint investigation, completed by Senior Investigator (SI) Heidy Bandana it was found that on 2.24.2025, R1 primary care physician (PCP) discontinued the prescription for Hydrocodone- Acetaminophen (Norco) tablet, 5-325 mg, two tablets every six hours as needed. According to R1’s PCP, they wrote a new prescription for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Norco) tablet, 10-325, one tablet every four hours as needed. Per centrally stored medication and destruction records (CSMDR), reviewed by SI-Bendana, the facility was giving R1 two tablets of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen instead of one as prescribed as of 02.24.25. In addition, Incident report dated 3.21.2025, started at 1100 hours, R1 took his prescribed Hydrocodone 10-325 mg; then the incident report also stated R1's last dose was administered at 1000 hours. The day of the incident, R1 was found sweaty, warm to the touch, unresponsive, drooling, with snoring respiration. R1 became somewhat alert after paramedics administered two Narcan injections. Based on the interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper medication assistance to R1, which reflected R1’s health and safety. A deficiency is cited on the corresponding LIC 809-D page. Deficiencies Cited. Exit Interview Conducted. Report Issued. Licensee was informed that an immediate Civil Penalty of $500.00 will be issued to the facility at the time of this visit. Additional civil penalty maybe be assessed at later time based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49. Exit interview was conducted. Appeal rights discussed and a copy of report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 31, 2025

Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services. Once ordered by the physician, the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the information obtained during the course of the investigation, staff did not comply with the section cited by failing to ensure R1's Norco medication was given as prescribed, which posed an immediate health and safety and personal rights risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2025

Plan of correction: Within 24 hour the Licensee will provide written plan of action explaining the steps they will take to avoid similar issues from happening again. Medication training through the licensed vendor must be secured within 24 hours and training records will be provided upon completion.

Jul 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an annual required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA was greeted with staff Daniyar Kusoangaliyev and Robert Mkrttchian and was advised for the reason of the visit. At 9:30 AM who is the designee met with LPA, explained the reason for the visit. At 10:00 AM, with the assistance of designee, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. At 11:36 AM the smoke alarms are operational that are located each bedroom, the hallway and kitchen. There are carbon monoxide detectors that functions properly. The fire extinguisher is in the kitchen. The charge date is 11/7/2024. During the visit the facility is at 73 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is fire cleared maybe for six (06) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) bedridden room #4. Hospice waiver for six (6). Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. The kitchen has a working gas stove, faucet, freezer, refrigerator, and microwave. LPA found enough at least two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food at the facility that is properly stored. Frozen foods are wrap, dated, and stored properly as well. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Garbage cans have tight fitting covers. Cleaning supplies, pesticides or toxic cleaning supplies were stored and locked away in the locked laundry area. Office is located beside the living room. Bedrooms: There were four (4) bedrooms designated for residents' use. Bedroom #1 and bedroom #3 are for private used. Bedroom #2 and bedroom #4 are shared and is used for residents only, Bedrooms were properly furnished with appropriate dresser, beddings, and linens with sufficient lighting. Continue to LIC 809-C BATHROOMS: At 1:10 PM LPA observed three (3) bathrooms are clean and in good repair. Properly supplied with toilet papers, soap, and paper towels. The hot water temperature measured between 119.5°F. observed appropriate grab bar and had non-skid mat. Bathroom #1 is located in the hallway beside the entrance of the facility. Bathroom #2 is located inside bedroom #3 for private use. Hot water for bathroom #2 measured at 113.2°F. Bathroom #3 is located inside bedroom #4 for private use. Hot water for bathroom #3 measured at 118.1°F. Common Areas: LPA toured all common areas of the facility. These included the living room and dining area for residents. The common areas were properly furnished. Residents dining table fits enough for six (6). LPA observed common areas to be very clean and tidy. LPA observed the floors to be in very good condition. No obstructions and or tripping hazards throughout the facility. Furniture in common area was observed to be in good repair. There are no issues with Fire Clearance. Infection control: Facility mitigation plan to make sure licensee was following current infection control recommendations. LPA obtain a copy and reviewed the infection control plan during this visit. Surrounding Grounds: Entry and exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The facility does not have a swimming pool or bodies of water. There is no garage in the facility only street parking. Laundry service: There is enough linen available to change weekly or more if need. Cleaning supplies are being stored in a locked cabinet in the laundry area and is located beside the kitchen. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to ensure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Office is located beside the dining table. Records were checked for expired or missing certificates and clearances: LPA conducted a file review of staff for criminal record clearances and current First Aid. The administrator file was reviewed for current first aid, fingerprint clearance, administrator certificate, and HIV/AIDS and TB training. Continue to LIC 809-C Medications are in a centrally stored and locked place, including over-the-counter medicines; medications are properly labeled and checked for expiration dates. Each centrally stored prescription and PRN medication has been logged in the medications log with proper documentation from the residents’ physician. It was observed on 12:30 PM R1 and R4 medication were pop-out of the bubble pack and prep in a cup for the residents to take later tonight. Deficiency will be cited on LIC 809-D. First-aid has all proper items and is current. Resident records were reviewed for requirements and legibility: LPA reviewed client’s files for current appraisal. Planned activities are offered. Facility is not within CA code of Regulations Title 22 or Health and Safety Code. Deficiencies were found, exit interview conducted, copy of report has been issued and discussed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2025
Apr 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 4.8.2025 in conjunction with an initial complaint visit control number 31-AS-20250404163531. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda completed an unannounced CASE MANAGEMENT- Deficiencies visit. LPA met with staff designee Sona Gevorkyan, explained the purpose of the visit. During the facility tour at 10:19 AM . LPA observe the following: Facility did not notify Regional Office (RO) regarding resident #1 (R1) being in hospice. Upon record review, LPA observed facility medications and supplies to have surplus that were from residents who are no longer at the facility. Per the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiency was observed and cited (Refer to LIC 809-D). Copy of this report provided, appeal rights given. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87632(d)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 22, 2025

The licensee shall notify the Department in writing within five working days of the initiation of hospice care services for any terminally ill resident in the facility or within five working days of admitting a resident already receiving hospice care services. The notice shall include the resident's name and date of admission to the facility and the name and address of the hospice. Based on record review, administrator did not comply with the above section by failing to report R1 being in hospice, which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to send hospice notification to RO of R1. Administrator will sign a declaration that they will ensure the facility abides by the regulation cited. Signed declaration will be sent to LPA by POC date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87465(i) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 22, 2025

Prescription medications which are not taken with the resident upon termination of services, not returned to the issuing pharmacy, nor retained in the facility as ordered by the resident’s physician and documented in the resident’s record nor disposed of according to the hospice’s established procedures or which are otherwise to be disposed of shall be destroyed in the facility by the facility administrator and one other adult who is not a resident. Based on record review, administrator did not comply with the above section by failing to dispose residents medication and supplies who are not residing at the facility, which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to dispose and remove rx that belong to residents who are not residing at the facility anymore. Administrator will sign a declaration that they will ensure the facility abides by the regulation cited. Signed declaration will be sent to LPA by POC date.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

At 9:38am Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Leslie Ngo-Castaneda and Leizl De La Cerra conducted an announced pre-Licensing visit for a change of ownership to the above facility and met with Administrator, Sona Gevorkyan. Fire Clearance was approved on 1/30/2024 for a maximum capacity of six (6) residents, of which six (6) Non-Ambulatory and one (1) bedridden residents in room #4; hospice for six (6). The purpose of today’s visit is to inspect the facility to ensure that the facility is in compliance with rules and regulations under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. The facility is a single-story building. Today's site visit consisted of team touring the physical plant inside and outside and observed the following: KITCHEN: The kitchen is equipped with a refrigerator, freezer, microwave oven and sink. At 10:34am, the team observed adequate supplies of perishable and nonperishable food and dining ware to accommodate a maximum capacity of six (6). All knives and sharps are observed to be locked in a kitchen drawer and inaccessible to residents. FIRE EXTINGUISHER was last purchased on 1/30/2024 is located in the kitchen. First-aid is complete. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms designated for client use. All bedrooms are furnished with beds, dresser and required bedding and linen. Extra linen is available in the cabinet at the hallway. The bedrooms have sufficient closet space and have sufficient lighting. Auditory alarms were tested and observed to be operational. Facility will have awake staff. Bedroom #1 and bedroom #2 is for private use located at the left side of the hallway. Bedroom #3 and bedroom #4 is shared located at the right side of the hallway. Continue to LIC 809-C BATHROOMS: At 10:48am the team observed three (3) bathrooms are clean and in good repair. Properly supplied with toilet papers, soap, and paper towels. The hot water temperature measured between 117.5°F. observed appropriate grab bar and had non-skid mat. Bathroom #1 is located in the hallway beside the entrance of the facility. Bathroom #2 is located inside bedroom #3 for private use. Hot water for bathroom #2 measured at 117.2°F. Bathroom #3 is located inside bedroom #4 for private use. Hot water for bathroom #3 measured at 118.1°F. COMMON AREAS: The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 71°F. The living room and dining appeared clean and were properly furnished. No obstructions and or tripping hazards throughout the facility. Office is located beside the living room and exit to the patio. MEDICATION: The medications will be kept in the kitchen cabinet and the team observed the cabinet kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. SMOKE DETECTORS/CARBON MONOXIDE. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were located throughout the facility. At 10:35am they were tested and observed to be operational. SURROUNDING GROUNDS: In the back of the facility has sufficient yard space. LPAs observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for clients. The backyard is fenced. LPAs discussed the importance of maintaining the care and supervision to meet the needs of clients. There are no bodies of water. The driveway passageway and entrance to the home was clear of obstructions. All entry and exit doors have a functional auditory alert when the doors open. GARAGE – there is a garage that is used as a storage and is blocked off to the residents. In addition, LPAs observed laundry room is located in the beside the kitchen. The washer/dryer appear to be in good condition. Laundry supplies are kept lock and inaccessible when not in use with supervision. Component III was conducted with the administrator and licensee. Facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations at this time. This report will be forwarded to the Centralized Application Bureau (CAB) and be notified by the CAB Analyst when your license has been approved. Exit interview was conducted and with a copy of this report was provided to the Applicant/Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2024
Mar 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): 4 COMP II Participants: Siranuysh Gevorkyan/Lic Sona Gevorkyan/Admin Interview Method: Telephone interview On 3/14/24, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County