Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Avocado Creek

Mid-size home·Licensed for 12·Escondido, California

Licensed since 2007Licence #374602565
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$4,500 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 12Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit10 of 12 beds occupiedJanuary 14, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJanuary 14, 2026CDSS inspection record

Avocado Creek is a mid-size care home in Escondido — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 12 residents since 2007. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Avocado Creek

Is Avocado Creek licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Avocado Creek licensed for?

12 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Avocado Creek been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is Avocado Creek still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Avocado Creek cost?

$4,500 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 31 other homes of a similar licensed size in Escondido that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 31 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Avocado Creek take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Avocado Creek, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Palomar Ucsd Medical Center Escondido is 1.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Avocado Creek keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 5 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Avocado Creek license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “AVOCADO CREEK”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374602565. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 12 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Avocado Creek, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2007, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is January 14, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 12 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 5 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES TWELVE (12) NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE. FACILITY HAS A HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIVE (5) AND APPROVE FOR ONE BEDRIDDEN RESIDENT.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 5 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$4,500a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$4,500a month

Likely $4,500–$5,100

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,500this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,500–$5,100
$4,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,500–$8,600
$6,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

17 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,850–$6,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 17 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1080 Avocado Ave, Escondido, CA 92026Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2007. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on January 14, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
6
Most recent visit
January 14, 2026
Occupied at that visit
10 of 12 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated December 16, 2024 to January 14, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 1

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2007.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202422020232202021110

The last 36 months — 4 of 6 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that a resident was provided with a safe environment

On 01/14/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Marija Banovic who was informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews, and obtained copies of pertinent documentation. Regarding the allegation, “Staff did not ensure that resident was provided a safe environment” it was alleged on 01/02/2026 and 01/04/2026, Resident 1 (R1) reported wanting to get a gun to kill Resident 2 (R2). It was further alleged on 01/03/2026, R1 slapped R2 in the facility. During the tour, LPA did not observe any firearms in the home. LPA reviewed an Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC 624) dated 01/03/2026 documenting on 01/02/2026 at 1:20 p.m. Staff 1 (S1) and a nurse observed R1 stand up from a reclining chair in the living room, begin walking towards R2, and slapped R2 for no reason. The LIC 624 documents police were called and R1 was transported to the hospital by police on 01/04/2026. Unsubstantiated S1 was interviewed and reported the following information. The incident occurred on 01/02/2026 not 01/03/2026 as alleged and was an isolated incident involving R2. On 01/02/2026, S1 was speaking with a hospice nurse in the kitchen when they observed the incident as described in the LIC 624. S1 and the nurse immediately responded to the scene, separated and redirected the residents, assessed R2 for injuries/pain, and called law enforcement and Administrator Banovic. R1 claimed to have a gun and threatened to kill R2. However, R1 does not own a gun, nor did they have the means to go out to purchase one. R1 has resided in the facility since October 2025 and prior to this incident, R1 had not exhibited any signs of aggression in the past. Law enforcement and administrator responded to the facility, and law enforcement determined that due to R1’s cognitive impairment and limited physical capabilities, R1 was not realistically able to gain access to a firearm to carry out the threat. Law enforcement advised S1 to follow up with the Crisis Response Team (CRT) and request an evaluation for R1. Law enforcement determined it was safe for R1 remain in the facility pending CRTs evaluation. As a result, S1 was assigned by administrator to provide 1:1 care and supervision to R1 to ensure the safety of R2 and the remaining residents pending the CRTs evaluation results. A witness interview was conducted with the hospice nurse identified from the LIC 624. This witness corroborated the information provided by S1 and added they also assessed R2 for injuries. The witness reported they have visited R2 in the facility twice a week since 02/01/2025 and have never witnessed R1 or any other resident make verbal threats or display physical aggression towards R1 or other residents. Administrator was interviewed, corroborated the information provided by S1 and added the following information. There are no firearms stored in the facility. On 01/03/2026, S1 contacted CRT due to R1 aggressing towards staff. Law enforcement responded to the facility and determined it was safe for R1 to remain in the facility pending their CRT evaluation scheduled for 01/04/2026. On 01/04/2026, R1 was hospitalized as a result of the CRT evaluation. Administrator reported they ensured the safety of all residents in care and even offered R1 a private room to avoid further possible incidents by residing with a roommate, to which R1 accepted. Administrator maintained contact with R1’s responsible person who was in the process of arranging for R1 to also be evaluated by their primary care physician. LPA conducted an interview with R1’s responsible person who reported facility staff have done a fantastic job despite current difficult circumstances. R1’s responsible person reported prior to this incident, R1 did not display any aggression. They reported R1 does not own a firearm, has never touched one, and is not able to gain access to one. LPA reviewed R1’s signed physician’s report dated 10/23/2025 documenting R1 has dementia. The “Expressions of Frustration” subsection in R1’s physician’s report is marked “No”. This subsection is nested under the category “Behavioral Expressions” defined as behavior(s) displayed by a resident that may result in harm to self or others. LPA reviewed a letter from the Department of Justice dated 01/05/2026 addressed to R1 prohibiting them from possessing or gaining access to a firearm or any other deadly weapon beginning 01/04/2026 to 01/04/2031. R1 refused to be interviewed. LPA conducted an interview with R2 who recalled the incident as described in the LIC 624 and reported S1 ran to the incident location to intervene and assess them for injuries. R2 reported they did not experience any verbal threats or physical aggression from R1 or any other residents in the home prior to this incident. R2 reported S1 offered them immediate medical attention to which R2 declined. LPA made contact with the reporting party who reported facility staff intervened and responded appropriately to the incidents involving R1 and R2. LPA was unable to identify any additional possible witnesses. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and Confidential Names list (LIC 811) was reviewed and provided to Administrator Banovic.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026 · control 18-AS-20260106095207
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Night staff do not respond to resident's call for assistance Staff left resident in soiled diapers for an extended time period Staff on duty is unable to transfer resident

On 12/16/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with Licensee, Marija Banovic who was informed of the purpose of the visit. It was alleged Resident 1 (R1) uses a bell to call for assistance during night hours, but facility staff cannot hear it and do not respond. It was further alleged R1 does not receive incontinent care throughout the night and facility staff are unable to transfer R1 when using the hoyer lift. R1 was interviewed and corroborated the allegations. Regarding the allegation "Night staff do not respond to resident's call for assistance", LPA reviewed the facility’s program description noting each resident will receive routine observation, care, and supervision. LPA reviewed R1’s Physician’s Report (LIC 602A) dated 3/21/23 indicating R1 is able to communicate their needs and does not exhibit confusion or wandering behavior. LPA also reviewed R1’s Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (LIC625) dated 2/15/2023 noting R1 exhibits confusion. Licensee was interviewed and reported overnight staff have a baby monitor near them to listen and respond to resident bell calls, incidents, and emergencies. Unsubstantiated Two (2) care staff were interviewed and reported they check on the residents three (3) times during night hours and are able to hear resident bell calls from the baby monitor. Both staff interviewed reported they have not received complaints from residents reporting they sounded the bell during night hours and did not receive assistance. Two (2) additional residents were interviewed of which one (1) reported they are independent and do not require assistance from facility staff. One (1) of two (2) residents interviewed reported they do not require assistance from staff during night hours and only sound the bell to call for help during the day, to which facility staff respond in a timely manner. Regarding the allegation "Staff left resident in soiled diapers for an extended time period" R1's LIC 602A indicates R1 does not have the capacity to care for their own toileting needs. Staff 1 was interviewed and reported R1 exhibited memory lapses as evidenced by their complaints of staff not providing incontinent care moments after S1 changed their brief. An additional staff was interviewed and reported they assist R1 with incontinent care as necessary. Two (2) residents were interviewed, of which one (1) reported they do not require assistance with incontinent care. One (1) of two (2) residents interviewed reported facility staff provide incontinent care to them in a timely manner. Regarding the allegation "Staff on duty is unable to transfer resident" R1's LIC 602A indicates R1 is non-ambulatory and does not have the capacity to independently transfer themselves to and from bed. Licensee reported all facility staff received hoyer lift training to assist R1 with transfers. LPA reviewed the facility’s Training Log signed by facility staff documenting on 9/6/2023 they received a one (1) hour hoyer lift operation training for R1. Two (2) staff were interviewed and confirmed they received hoyer lift training and added they assist R1 with transfers anytime they request it. Two (2) residents were interviewed, of which one (1) reported they are able to independently transfer themselves to and from bed. One (1) of two (2) residents interviewed reported staff assist them with transfers each time they request it. Information gathered by the two (2) additional residents interviewed did not corroborate or refute the allegations. LPA made several attempts to contact R1's responsible person for an interview but was unsuccessful. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2024 · control 18-AS-20230901085939
Nov 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

n 11/14/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver, Marisa Hipolito who was informed of the purpose of the visit. Licensee, Marija Banovic arrived during the visit. The facility has a fire clearance for 12 non-ambulatory elderly residents of which one (1) may be bedridden. The facility also has an approved hospice waiver for five (5) and LPA was informed three (3) residents are currently receiving hospice services at the facility. During the visit, there was eight (8) residents and two (2) staff present. LPA toured the facility with Caregiver Hipolito and observed the facility is made up of a one-story home with 10 resident bedrooms, seven bathrooms, a kitchen, dining room, and attached garage. Resident bedrooms had the required bedding, furniture and lighting. Bathrooms had grab bars and non-skid mats in the showers. Indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. The facility had a two-day supply of perishable foods and seven-day supply of non-perishable foods, which were stored in a safe and healthful manner. Knives are secured in a locked kitchen drawer. Medications are secured in a locked dining room cabinet. LPA toured the garage and observed an operating laundry washer and dryer along with additional incontinent supplies, blankets, comforters, food and water. Cleaning solutions are secured in a locked storage cabinet in the garage. Licensee Banovic tested one of the smoke alarms/carbon monoxide detectors and LPA observed it to be operation. LPA also observed charged fire extinguishers mounted throughout the facility, last serviced on 6/26/2024. Staff present have a criminal record clearance and valid first aid/cardiopulmonary certification. LPA reviewed the facility's Fire Drill Log noting the facility's last fire drill was conducted on 10/13/2024. Complaint information, facility sketch, and emergency phone numbers are visibly posted near the front entrance and dining room walls. During today's visit, LPA did not observe any issues or concerns. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Licensee Banovic.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On November 29, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived to the facility unannounced in order to conduct the required annual inspection, and met with the Administrator, Marija Banovic. LPA Mixson toured the facility, along with the Administrator, Marija Banovic, and inspected the inside and outside of the facility. There were no obstructions to indoor and/or outdoor passageways at the time of this visit. The facility is a single story home, located at 1080 Avocado Ave Escondido CA 92026. Physical Plant: The facility is not operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL), which is 12, but has 9 residents at the time of this visit. The facility phone number is (760)822-5860, and is operable at this time. The LPA observed the resident's bedrooms, and each was equipped with required furniture; including bed & mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting. The LPA inspected the residents bathrooms, and the hot water temperature tested within regulations. The bathrooms were clean and appliances were operating appropriately at the time of this visit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, and a fire extinguisher. Posters such as; the Ombudsman and CCL complaint poster were posted in a common area. The cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharps were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident and staff files. Medications: were reviewed, and were locked and inaccessible to the residents. The overall facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents currently at the time of this visit. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents, and there are a variety of food types available for the residents. Dishes and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient staff, and staff were engaging the residents during this visit. Record Review: LPA Mixson interviewed two staff, the residents were not available at the time of this visit. The LPA reviewed four resident files, and two staff files, and the required CCL reports from previous visits. There were no observable Title 22, Division 6 Regulation violations observed and/or cited during todays visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator, Marija Bancovic.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

Meals, preferences & familiar food

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredActivities On-site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversCroatian · English · Spanish

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

Visiting & staying involved

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County