Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Avalon Palm Care, Inc. DBA Avalon Palm

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Diego, California

Licensed since 2021Licence #374604489Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$6,050 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,950–$7,450
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedMay 10, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitDecember 10, 2025CDSS inspection record

Avalon Palm Care, Inc. DBA Avalon Palm is a small care home in San Diego — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Avalon Palm Care, Inc. DBA Avalon Palm

Is Avalon Palm Care, Inc. DBA Avalon Palm licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Avalon Palm Care, Inc. DBA Avalon Palm licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Avalon Palm Care, Inc. DBA Avalon Palm been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Avalon Palm Care, Inc. DBA Avalon Palm still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Avalon Palm Care, Inc. DBA Avalon Palm cost?

$6,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,950–$7,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 49 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,950 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 49 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Avalon Palm Care, Inc. DBA Avalon Palm take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Avalon Palm Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

UC San Diego Health La Jolla - Jacobs Medical Center & Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center is 3.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Avalon Palm Care, Inc. DBA Avalon Palm keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Avalon Palm Care, Inc. DBA Avalon Palm license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “AVALON PALM CARE, INC. DBA AVALON PALM”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374604489. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Avalon Palm Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is December 10, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS OF WHICH ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ROOMS 1-5 APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR FOUR (4) HOSPICE RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$6,050a month to start

Likely $4,950–$7,450

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$6,050a month

Likely $4,950–$7,600

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$6,050likely $4,950–$7,450

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,950–$7,600
$6,050
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,750–$10,600
$8,050
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,850–$8,750.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 3271 Innuit Ave, San Diego, CA 92117Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2021. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 10, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
11
Most recent visit
December 10, 2025
Occupied · May 10, 2024 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated April 18, 2024 to May 10, 2024. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20253302024330202322020221102021220

The last 36 months — 7 of 11 documents

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose De La Cruz conducted an unannounced Continuation Annual Inspection visit. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Fanetia Avril. During the visit the LPA interviewed residents, review records and completed the inspection tool. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Fanetia Avril. A copy of this report and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058), were provided to Caregiver Fanetia Avril to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during today’s visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2025
Dec 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose De La Cruz made an unannounced visit to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Maria Torga. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, ages 60 and over, one of which might be bed ridden. Hospice waiver approved for four (4) hospice residents. LPA and Licensee toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per caretaker, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher was serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC809] LPA interviewed staff and clients, and reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations.. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Maria Torga, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during today’s visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2025

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jan 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced Continuation Annual Inspection visit. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Magdarline Winblad. During the visit the LPA reviewed facility records, including the Infection Control Plan, Emergency Disaster Plan, Liability insurance, and resident and staff records. Facility postings were observed to be in a visible area of the facility. The facility had telephone service. The facility was clean, and in good repair. There were no deficiencies cited during the visit. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Bryan Gonzalez. A copy of this report and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058), were sent to Administrator Magdarline Winblad via email. An email read receipt confirms the documents were received by the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection visit. The LPA introduced himself to and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Malia Samuela. Administrator Magdarline Winblad arrived during the visit. The facility was licensed for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, of which one (1) may be bedridden in bedrooms one through five. The facility also had an approved hospice waiver for four (4) residents. The LPA, accompanied by staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected bedrooms. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. The facility had sufficient space to facilitate dining, visitation, meetings, and activities. No pools, nor bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per staff, no firearms nor ammunition were kept at the facility. Due to time constraints, an additional visit on a subsequent day is necessary to complete the annual inspection. No deficiencies were cited during today's date. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Malia Samuela. A a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058), were emailed to the administrator. An email read receipt confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 31, 2024
May 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure the facility was free from mold

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, conducted an unannounced follow up complaint investigation visit, and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Carmen Campas. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not ensure the facility was free from mold. On 04/15/2024, it was reported to the Department a source had witnessed a mildew smell in a resident’s bedroom. Interviews with both internal and external sources did not reveal any concerns with mold, nor similar smells emanating from resident bedrooms. On several visits to the facility, the LPA tour the facility, including the room in question, and did not witness any mildew, nor odors emanating from the rooms. (See LIC 9099C for continuation of report.) Unsubstantiated An interview with the administrator revealed a previous resident occupying the room in question may have stored a large amount of a dietary supplement, which could have contributed to the alleged smell. Staff, along with the LPA observation, confirmed bedroom windows were frequently opened to avoid odors. Based on the evidence obtained, there was not enough evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred, therefore, the allegation was Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Campas, to whom a copy of this report, and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240415153129
Apr 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not allow resident to visit with family/friends

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the allegation mentioned above. LPA was allowed entry by Malia Samuela, Caregiver . LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint to the Caregiver. On August 28, 2023, a complaint was received alleging that the licensee denied a resident's right to visit with their friend. The complainant alleged that the licensee did not allow Resident 1 (R1) to visit with their family and friends. The complainant claimed that the resident's visitation rights were being denied without any valid reason. Interviewed R1 to obtain their perspective on the visitation restrictions. Interviewed facility staff members who were involved in the decision-making process regarding visitation. Reviewed facility policies and procedures related to visitation rights. Examined any relevant documentation, such as visitation logs or incident reports. Continued on 9099C Unsubstantiated During the interview, the complainant stated that they had been denied to visit with R1 and were denied by the licensee. The complainant claimed that no valid reason was provided for the denial of visitation rights. The complainant also stated that they could visit outside of the residence on the porch. Staff members involved in the decision-making process regarding visitation were interviewed. They explained that the visitation restrictions were implemented due to continuous disruption to other residents in care and leaving the door to R1 bedroom open with the alarm disarmed which led to the resident leaving their room and being found in the patio and or backyard of the facility. The alarm is in place to alert staff to ensure the resident's safety. However, visitation was never denied to family or friends. Based on the investigation findings, it is concluded that the allegation of the licensee not allowing the resident to visit with their family and friends is unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Malia Samuela, Caregiver . A copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to the and her signature on this report confirms receipt of the Licensee Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 18, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230828153715
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Malia Samuela. Administrator Magdarline Winblad arrived during the visit and assisted the LPA. The facility file reflected the facility was licensed for four (4) non-ambulatory residents in rooms 1-4, one (1) bedridden in room # 5, and one ambulatory resident in room # 6. A review of documents and the Field Automation System (FAS), revealed the Department received an updated fire clearance, received a request for non- ambulatory increase, and the Department conducted a Case Management visit on 8/7/23. During today's visit, the LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, and stored in a locked area. No pools, nor bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per staff, no firearms, nor ammunition were kept at the facility. Smoke detectors, fire extinguisher(s), a first aid kit, and required licensing postings were observed in visible area of the facility. The LPA interviewed staff and reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Winblad, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County