Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Arjan Care Home

Small home·Licensed for 6·Antelope, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #345920019Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,700 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,750
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJanuary 15, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitJuly 22, 2026CDSS inspection record

Arjan Care Home is a small care home in Antelope — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Arjan Care Home

Is Arjan Care Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Arjan Care Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Arjan Care Home been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.

Is Arjan Care Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Arjan Care Home cost?

$4,700 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,850–$5,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size across Sacramento County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Arjan Care Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Bhandal, Sarvejeet, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Mercy San Juan Medical Center is 4.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Arjan Care Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Arjan Care Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ARJAN CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #345920019. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Bhandal, Sarvejeet, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 13 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 22, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,700a month to start

Likely $3,850–$5,750

From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,700a month

Likely $3,850–$5,950

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,700likely $3,850–$5,750

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,850–$5,950
$4,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,500–$9,050
$6,700
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

14 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,850–$6,100.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 14 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 9320 Palmerson Drive, Antelope, CA 95843Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 13 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 22, 2026.

On file since
2023
State visits
13
Most recent visit
July 22, 2026
Occupied · January 15, 2026 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated August 5, 2025 to January 15, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026330202534120242302023220

The last 36 months — 10 of 12 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 07/22/2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Sarvjeet Bhandal and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA and Administrator conducted a tour of the interior and exterior. Areas toured include but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, laundry and common areas. LPA observed required furniture, and lighting throughout the residents' bedrooms and facility. LPA observed residents' bathrooms to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair. LPA observed food supplies of non-perishables for a minimum of seven (7) days and perishable foods for a minimum of two (2) days. Toxins, cleaning supplies and knives are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed fire detectors and carbon monoxide alarms to be operable. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 04/12/2026. LPA observed medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA reviewed a total of four (4) resident files. LPA reviewed two (2) staff records. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. No deficiencies being cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2026
Mar 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 3/4/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Talwinder Bains arrived unannounced to conduct a case management inspection following receipt of incident report (LIC624), death report (LIC624A) for a resident ,R1, on 3/3/26. LPA met with staff and explained purpose of inspection. Administrator Sarvejeet Bhandal came after short while and assisted LPA with today's visit. LPA interviewed Administrator and discussed death of resident (R1) in more detail, including resident's recent condition prior to passing. LPA reviewed R1s paperwork, including but not limited to Physician's Report, Appraisal/Needs and Service Plan and Centrally Stored Medication Record . LPA requested R1s file documents to be sent to LPA via email by 3/4/26 by 5PM. At this time, further analysis is needed, and a copy of death certificate is also requested for review. There are no deficiencies being cited during today's inspection. Exit interview. Copy of report left at facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2026
Jan 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff financially abused resident in care

On 01/15/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver final findings to a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 09/05/2025. LPA met with Staff Gurleen Bhandal and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and walk through of the facility. Please continue to LIC9099C… Unfounded Allegation: Staff financially abused resident in care- Unfounded Facility Staff had assisted Resident #1 (R1) to the bank on 09/02/2025. R1 told staff they needed to pull out money to pay bills. R1 had asked Staff #1 (S1) the day prior to help write out bills and the amounts due. R1 is unable to leave the facility unassisted and has no Responsible Party, which led staff to assisting R1 at the bank. During R1s visit to the bank, no money was taken out of their accounts. Interviews with facility Administrator revealed that R1 has had a change in condition and facility is working on starting the process for R1 to be in a conservatorship through the state. Based on information obtained through interviews, the Department finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED,meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026 · control 59-AS-20250905132452
20253 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 09/10/2025 Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Laura Munoz and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a case management. LPM and LPA met with Administrator Sarvejeet Bhandal and explained the purpose of the visit. LPM and LPA conducted a file review for three (3) residents. Upon file review LPM and LPA observed Admission agreements to state under refund policy that we do not give refunds. Additionally, LPM and LPA observed the facility to have visiting hours posted in two spots throughout the facility. Facility was informed that they are not to have specific visiting hours for the facility. As a result of today's visit deficiencies observed. Please see LIC809D Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(h)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 24, 2025

87507 Admission Agreements (h) The admission agreement shall not contain the following:(3) Any provision that the facility knows or should know is deceptive or unlawful under applicable state or federal law. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above facility did not ensure that Admission agreements were incompliance. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee is to revise all six (6) resident agreements and remove we do not give refunds. Once completed Licensee will send all admission agreements to LPA by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87468.1(a)(11) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 17, 2025

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (11)To have their visitors, including ombudspersons and advocacy representatives, permitted to visit privately during reasonable hours and without prior notice, provided that the rights of other residents are not infringed upon. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above facility did not ensure that Admission agreements were incompliance. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee immediately removed visiting hour signs.

Aug 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 08/13/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA met with staff Gurleen Bhandal and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Sarvejeet Bhandal arrived towards the the end of LPAs visit. LPA and staff toured the interior and exterior of the facility. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, residents' bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, garage and backyard. LPA observed required furniture, and lighting throughout the residents' bedrooms and facility. LPA observed residents' bathrooms to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair. LPA observed food supplies of non-perishables for a minimum of seven (7) days and perishable foods for a minimum of two (2) days. Toxins, cleaning supplies and knives are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed fire detectors and carbon monoxide alarms to be operable. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 05/14/2025. LPA observed medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA reviewed a total of six (6) resident files. LPA reviewed two (2) staff records. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. No deficiencies being cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2025

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Aug 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff caused injuries to resident in care Facility staff did not report injuries to resident's responsible person Facility staff did not seek medical attention for resident

On 08/05/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver final findings to a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 02/13/2025. LPA met with Administrator Sarvejeet Bhandal and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and record review. Please continue to LIC9099C... Unsubstantiated Allegation: Facility staff caused injuries to resident in care-Unsubstantiated According to medical records, Resident #1 (R1) sustained a fracture on their finger on their right hand. R1 was bedbound and required a high level of care. Multiple staff were interviewed and stated the injury was present when R1 was admitted to the facility in November of 2024. Administrator observed additional swelling and reported the injury to R1’s Hospice Nurse. Additionally, there was allegations that R1 was found with bruising on their back area. Based on interviews conducted, there was insufficient evidence to determine if R1 had bruising on their back and if any bruising occurred at the facility. R1 stated a male “beat” them. R1 did not identify anyone by name. During the investigation, it was found that there were no male residents residing at facility however, there was a male staff. The male staff was interviewed and denied the allegations of abusing R1 or providing care to them at any time. Multiple staff were interviewed and denied seeing anyone aggressive or inappropriate towards R1. Allegation: Facility staff did not report injuries to resident's responsible person- Unsubstantiated Based on interviews R1 had the injury before they moved into the facility in November of 2024. Facility staff stated that R1s responsible person knew about the swelling as well. Staff does not have documentation of the conservation. LPA cannot prove or disprove if communication was happening between the facility and R1s responsible person. Allegation: Facility staff did not seek medical attention for resident- Unsubstantiated Staff stated they reported to R1’s Hospice Agency when they observed swelling on R1’s finger. Hospice records documented the injury was reported and additional emergency medical attention was not necessary due to R1 receiving hospice care services. Based on this information, these allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. At this time no deficiencies are cited. Exit interview conducted a copy of the report was left at the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250213143824
Aug 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not assisting resident with grooming as needed

On 08/05/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver final findings to a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 12/23/2024. LPA met with Administrator Sarvejeet Bhandal and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and record review. Please continue to LIC9099C... Substantiated Allegation: Facility staff are not assisting resident with grooming as needed Based on interviews with staff indicated that they did not assist R1 in cutting their finger and toe nails due to R1 having diabetes. Staff further stated they did not arrange for R1’s nails to be trimmed which resulted in R1’s finger and toe nails to become long and unkept. Based on LPAs interviews, the facility did not ensure that R1s grooming needs were met. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 regulations, Division 6, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. As a result of today's visit deficiencies are cited. Exit interview conducted a copy of the report and appeal rights were left at the facility. Allegation: Facility staff are not assisting resident with diabetic care as needed-Unsubstantiated Based on R1’s Physician Report (LIC602) and staff interviews, R1 is able to do their own injections for their diabetic mediation. The department was unable to interview resident as they moved out of the facility at the time this complaint was received by the department. Allegation: Facility staff are not assisting resident with incontinence care as needed- Unsubstantiated The Department conducted interviews and record reviews. R1s Physician Report (LIC602) dated 11/27/2024 indicated R1 was able to care of their own toileting needs. Interviews with staff indicated R1s health started to decline resulting in R1 not wanting to walk and/or care for their own toileting needs. Staff stated they assist R1 with their incontinence needs however due to R1’s decline, it would take several attempts to assist R1. Allegation: Facility staff are not assisting resident with hygiene as needed-Unsubstantiated Based on records reviewed, R1 was able to handle their own hygiene needs. Staff interviews indicated they did assist R1 with showers two (2) times a week. The department was unable to interview resident as they moved out of the facility at the time this complaint was received by the department. Based on this information, these allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. At this time no deficiencies are cited. Exit interview conducted a copy of the report was left at the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2025 · control 59-AS-20241223132536

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 19, 2025

87465Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (1)The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview the licensee did not comply with the section cited above facility did not ensure that R1s nails were trimmed. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee is to submit a plan on how the facility will arrange or assist in arranging residents medical needs. The plan shall include procedures, staff responsibilities and training.

20242 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Collateral

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Holly Williams arrived unannounced to conduct a collateral visit. LPAs Moleski and Williams met with facility administrator Sarvejeet Bhandal and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Williams interviewed a resident during this visit (R1). No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was held and a copy of this report was left with Bhandal.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2024
Jul 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct an annual required and post licensing visit. LPA met with Administrator Sarvejeet Bhandal and explained the purpose of the visit. For more information on the post licensing visit, please see LIC809 for Required - 1 Year dated 07/01/24. No deficiencies cited for the post licensing visit. Exit interview conducted a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2024
Jul 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 07/01/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA met with Administrator, Sarvejeet Bhandal and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA and Administrator toured the interior and exterior of the facility. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, residents' bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, garage and backyard. LPA observed required furniture, and lighting throughout the residents' bedrooms and facility. LPA observed residents' bathrooms to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair. LPA observed food supplies of non-perishables for a minimum of seven (7) days and perishable foods for a minimum of two (2) days. Toxins, cleaning supplies and knives are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The hot water temperature was measured in the kitchen at 119.1 degrees Fahrenheit. The temperature in the facility was 74 degrees Fahrenheit. First aid kit was completed. LPA observed fire detectors and carbon monoxide alarms to be operable. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 05/20/2024. LPA observed medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA reviewed a total of three (3) resident files. Resident files contain signed admission agreements, physician's reports, appraisals, identification sheets, releases, and resident's rights. LPA reviewed a total of one (1) staff record. Staff has training in infection control, first aid, and other various areas of care provision. LPA requested Administrator to send updated copies of the following by 07/08/24 to LPA LIC308- Designation of Administrative Responsibility Liability insurance Administrator Certificate No deficiencies being cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Sacramento County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Sacramento County