Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Arego Home
Small home·Licensed for 6·Glendale, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$5,150 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,350
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJanuary 28, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
- Last state visitJuly 8, 2026CDSS inspection record
Arego Home is a small care home in Glendale — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Arego Home
Is Arego Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Arego Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Arego Home been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Arego Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Arego Home cost?
$5,150 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,200–$6,350. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Glendale that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $6,000 to $8,000 a month, and the middle figure is $7,000 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Arego Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Arego Home Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center is 2.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Arego Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Arego Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “AREGO HOME INC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #198603495. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Arego Home Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 8, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved by the state
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM WITH REAR EXIT ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR FOUR (4).
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,150a month to start
Likely $4,200–$6,350
From 16 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,150a month
Likely $4,200–$6,500
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$5,150likely $4,200–$6,350
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,200–$6,500
- $5,150
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,900–$9,600
- $7,150
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
16 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,200–$8,000.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 16 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Alameda Board & CareGlendale · 0.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Dryden GardensGlendale · 1.5 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Chateau MagnoliaBurbank · 1.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Grant Serenity Homes of BurbankBurbank · 2.0 mi · Small home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Victor Jem Happy HomesBurbank · 2.1 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Grant Serenity of VerdugoBurbank · 2.8 mi · Small home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Grace Residential Care FacilityGlendale · 3.0 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Seniors' HavenBurbank · 3.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Grant Serenity HomesGlendale · 3.6 mi · Small home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakridge InnGlendale · 3.7 mi · Small home$9,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- The LighthouseToluca Lake · 3.8 mi · Mid-size home$2,500Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- A Cozy ChateauGlendale · 3.8 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Atwater Village SouthLos Angeles · 4.1 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio with alcove · seen September 9, 2026
- Ardenville Home Care IBurbank · 4.2 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Hollywood Healthy LivingSun Valley · 4.5 mi · Small home$3,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- St. Anne's Golden Years HomeLos Angeles · 4.8 mi · Small home$2,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 1017 Western Ave, Glendale, CA 91201Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2021. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 8, 2026.
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 8
- Most recent visit
- July 8, 2026
- Occupied · January 28, 2026 visit
- 6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 6, 2023 to January 28, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations1typical 0
- Substantiated allegations1typical 0
- Total complaints3typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 6 of 8 documents
Jul 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 07/08/2026 at 7:45am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gina Saucedo conducted an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA was greeted by the Marianna Ohanyan, Caregiver and stated the reason for their visit. The Administrator, Armen Markosian about twenty (20) minutes after to assist with the visit. LPA asked for the census, Staff and Resident files. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at approximately 8:55am and the following was noted: The facility is a single-story building with four (4) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms. The facility is currently occupying five (5) residents. There is no designated staff room. The facility has an approved fire clearance for six (6) non-ambulatory residents of which one (1) may be bedridden. Hospice waiver approved for four (4). The living room and dining room were observed to be neat, clean, and organized. The rooms were observed to be properly furnished and in good repair. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 75°F. LPA observed a fire extinguisher to be located near the kitchen and dated 06/2026. Kitchen: The kitchen was observed to be clean and free from pests. Sufficient supplies of seven (7) day nonperishable foods and two (2) day perishable foods were observed. Knives/sharps were observed to be locked and inaccessible to the residents in a top kitchen cabinet. The cleaning solutions/toxins were observed to be kept locked underneath the kitchen sink. Kitchen appliances were observed to be working and in proper condition. LIC 809C-continued Bedrooms/Bathrooms: The resident's rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hallways/passageways are lighted appropriately. Extra linens/covers were observed to be stored in cabinets located within the hallway’s passageway. The hot water temperature was measured within regulations of 114 Fahrenheit for the bathrooms. LPA observed appropriate grab rails and slip-resistant mats to be in proper condition. Front/Backyard: The front yard of the facility is equipped with a designated shaded area with outdoor furniture for residents. The backyard of the facility was observed to be clean. There is no body of water located at the facility. Laundry Room: The laundry room was observed to be located outside of the facility. LPA observed the laundry room to be kept locked and inaccessible to the residents with more chemicals and extra incontinence. The laundry appliances were observed to be working and in proper condition. Garage: There is no garage. Medications: The medications along with staff and residents’ files were observed to be kept in a locked cabinets located near the kitchen and inaccessible to the residents. First-aid kit observed to be fully equipped. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide observed to be working properly and were tested. Residents/Staff Records: LPA conducted a complete file review of five (5) resident records and three (3) staff records. Administration: LPA observed the following postings against the wall of the entrance of the facility: Long-Term Care Ombudsman, YES Sign, Emergency Disaster Plan, Personal Rights, Rights of Resident Councils, Certificate of Liability, Administrative Certificate, LGBT Bill of Rights and License of Facility. The liability insurance expires on 10/01/26. There is another fire extinguisher outside coming into the entrance of the facility fully charged and dated 05/2026. An exit interview was conducted, no citation(s) were issued and a copy of this report was given to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2026
Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision, resulting in resident eloping and sustaining injuries
On 01/28/26, at 9:50am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gina Saucedo arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced, initial complaint visit and was greeted by Marianna Ohanyan, Caregiver. The administrator was called and arrived shortly after. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to gather information, interview staff and residents and deliver findings for this complaint. On 01/28/26, LPA Saucedo asked for the census, staff, and resident rosters. On 01/28/26, at 10:25am, LPA Saucedo conducted a physical tour and conducted interviews. LIC 9099C-continued Substantiated Regarding the allegation: Staff did not provide adequate supervision, resulting in resident eloping and sustaining injuries. It is being alleged that resident #1 (R1) eloped from the above facility, was missing for several hours and sustained injuries. During LPA's interview with R1, R1 did confirm that they left the above facility and was gone for several hours. R1 confirmed that they left early in the morning and returned around 4pm on the day they left. LPA interviewed three (3) staff, two (2) out of the three (3) staff confirmed that this is R1's second time leaving the facility. Two (2) out of the three (3) staff were present when R1 left the facility on 01/23/26. One (1) staff confirmed that they were cleaning so they did not see R1 leave the facility. Another staff did confirm that they were in and out of the facility and the front door was partially open and R1 was missing for several hours. When LPA interviewed R1, R1 did confirm they left from the front door. R1 also confirmed that they fell twice when they were walking around the streets. LPA also observed two (2) red marks on R1's facial area. LPA conducted an additional interview with a witness that confirmed this is R1's second time leaving the above facility. LPA reviewed and obtained the following documents regarding R1-Medical Assessment, Preplacement Appraisal, Resident Appraisal and Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan confirming R1 has dementia. LPA attempted to interview three (3) additional residents but to no avail did they understand and/or answer LPA's questions. Therefore, based on the record reviews and interviews conducted, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED at this time. An exit interview was conducted, citation(s) were issued for the above allegation(s), an appeal rights and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260126103402
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 11, 2026
87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities...Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement is not met by: Based on the LPA record reviews and interviews the licensee/administrator did not ensure proper supervision was provided to R1 from the above facility which poses a potential Health, Safety or Personal Rights risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator shall update R1's Resident Appraisal and Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan including that R1 elopes/wanders around and extra supervision is needed. POC Due Date and Cleard on:02/11/26
Dec 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident developed an infection while in care due to staff neglect Staff do not follow proper food safety protocols Staff mismanage resident's medications
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Marriana Ohanyan and explained the reason for the visit. --- Resident developed an infection while in care due to staff neglect. It was alleged that facility failed to provide proper post-operative care, the wound dressing was not changed regularly, and food tray was left uncleaned near R1’s foot which led to resident developing an infection. To investigate the allegation, on 06/04/2025 at around 10:10a.m., LPA Antonia Alvizar- Ettima requested documents, conducted a physical plant tour and at around 12:00p.m., interviewed two (02) staff. On 10/23/2025, LPA conducted a physical plant tour at around 10:30a.m., requested documents at around 11:30a.m., interviewed two (02) staff from 12:00p.m. to 1:00p.m. and interviewed five (05) out of six (06) residents from around 1:30p.m. to 3:30p.m. (CONT. on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated LPA was unable to interview one (01) resident due to current health condition. During the physical plant tour, LPA did not observe any food trays being left in residents’ rooms. A review of R1’s Hospital Admission Records indicates the R1 has previous infection conditions prior to R1’s most recent hospitalization. The facility’s visitor’s log also indicates that Home Health visited once or twice a week. During interviews with staff, all staff stated Home Health was in the facility once or twice a week and staff were trained on how to change the dressing as needed. Staff added that R1 came to the facility with infections and that if anything, the facility healed R1 and made R1 better. During interviews with residents, all interviewed residents stated they feel confident staff would follow doctor’s orders and assist in getting the necessary care they need. Based on observations, record review and interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. --- Staff do not follow proper food safety protocols. It was alleged that when R1 doesn’t eat lunch, the same meal is reheated and served for dinner. To investigate the allegation, on 06/04/2025 at around 10:10a.m., LPA Antonia Alvizar- Ettima requested documents, conducted a physical plant tour and at around 12:00p.m., interviewed two (02) staff. On 10/23/2025, LPA Duguma conducted a physical plant tour at around 10:30a.m., requested documents at around 11:30a.m., interviewed two (02) staff from 12:00p.m. to 1:00p.m. and interviewed five (05) out of six (06) residents from around 1:30p.m. to 3:30p.m. LPA was unable to interview one (01) resident due to current health condition. During the physical plant tour, LPA observed fresh foods being prepared. A review of the facility’s sample menu shows that facility serves a variety of well-balanced meals for breakfast, lunch and dinner. LPA observed at least two days of perishable foods and seven days of non-perishable foods available. During interviews with staff, all staff stated they do not reheat what was served for lunch again for dinner. During interviews with residents, all interviewed residents stated they are pleased with the food and do not feel that facility is serving them leftover foods. Based on observations, record review and interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. (CONT. on LIC9099-C) --- Staff mismanage resident's medications. It was alleged that staff regularly leave medications out on Resident #1’s (R1) bedside in a shared room, which is unsafe and increases the risk of medication mix-ups or misuse. To investigate the allegation, on 06/04/2025 at around 10:10a.m., LPA Antonia Alvizar- Ettima requested documents, conducted a physical plant tour and at around 12:00p.m., interviewed two (02) staff. On 10/23/2025, LPA Duguma conducted a physical plant tour at around 10:30a.m., requested documents at around 11:30a.m., interviewed two (02) staff from 12:00p.m. to 1:00p.m. and interviewed five (05) out of six (06) residents from around 1:30p.m. to 3:30p.m. During the physical plant tour, LPA did not observe any medications left out. LPA was unable to interview one (01) resident due to current health condition. During interviews with staff, all staff stated they do not leave medications out and wait for residents to take their medications. During interviews with residents, all interviewed residents stated facility does not leave medications unattended. Based on interviews and observations, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. No health and safety hazards noted during the visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250530112416
Oct 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 10/11/2025 at approximately 09:20 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Angelica Segovia conducted an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA was greeted by the caregiver and stated the reason for their visit. The Administrator, Armen Markosian arrived shortly after to assist with today’s visit. LPA asked for the census, Staff/Resident Roster, and Liability Insurance. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at approximately 12:30 PM and the following was noted: The facility is a single-story building with four (4) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms. The facility is currently occupying six (6) residents. There is no designated staff room. The facility has an approved fire clearance for six (6) non-ambulatory residents of which one (1) may be bedridden. Hospice waiver approved for four (4). Common areas: The living room and dining room were observed to be neat, clean, and organized. The rooms were observed to be properly furnished and in good repair. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 74°F. LPA observed a fire extinguisher to be located near the kitchen and dated 06/03/2025. LPA observed required postings such as Long-Term Care Ombudsman, Emergency Disaster Plan, and Personal Rights to be located alongside the entrance. A working telephone was observed. Kitchen: The kitchen was observed to be clean and free from pests. Sufficient supplies of seven (7) day nonperishable foods and two (2) day perishable foods were observed. Knives/sharps were observed to be kept in a locked kitchen drawer. The cleaning solutions/toxins were observed to be kept locked underneath the kitchen sink. Kitchen appliances were observed to be working and in proper condition. (continued on LIC 809-C) Bedrooms: The residents’ rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hallways/passageways are lighted appropriately. Extra linens/covers were observed to be stored in cabinets located within the hallway’s passageway. Bathrooms: The bathrooms were checked for cleanliness and proper operation. The hot water temperature was measured within regulations. LPA observed appropriate grab rails and slip-resistant mats to be in proper condition. Front/Backyard: The front yard of the facility is equipped with a designated shaded area with outdoor furniture for residents. The backyard of the facility was observed to be clean. There is no body of water located at the facility. Laundry Room: The laundry room was observed to be located outside of the facility. LPA observed the laundry room to be kept locked. LPA observed cleaning solutions and toxins stored appropriately within the laundry room and inaccessible to residents. The laundry appliances were observed to be working and in proper condition. Garage: LPA observed there to be no garage. Medications: The medications along with staff and residents’ files were observed to be kept in a locked cabinets located near the kitchen. First-aid kit observed to be equipped with but not limited to bandages, scissors, digital thermometer, tweezer and First-Aid Manuel. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide observed to be working properly and were tested. Residents/Staff Records: LPA conducted a complete file review of resident records. Resident records were not complete and/or updated. Staff records: LPA conducted a complete file review of staff records. Staff records were not complete and/or updated. (Continue to LIC 809-c) The following deficiencies were observed during the day of inspection: -LPA observed R2 to have a postural support (Belt) attached to them and their wheelchair without a physician’s order. -4 out of 6 residents were missing their updated re-appraisals. -4 out of 6 residents were missing their annual medical/ Physician's report. Citations issued, please refer to 809-D. There were no other immediate health and safety hazards observed during the day of inspection. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights given and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 11, 2025
The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 6. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Sep 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an annual required visit. LPA met with Administrator Armen Markosian and explained the reason for the visit. LPA used the Care tool to evaluate the facility. LPA inspected the facility plant, reviewed resident files, staff files, and reviewed staff fingerprint clearances. Facility is approved to retain/accept six (06) hospice residents. There are currently 5 residents on hospice. The facility is a single story structure located in a residential neighborhood. LPA toured the facility. LPA observed that the facility does not have a swimming pool or other bodies of water. All indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. There is only one entrance being utilized at the facility, all required posters were posted at the entrance. Sign in sheet, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks are available. Home consists of the following: 4 resident bedrooms, 2 bathrooms , living room, dining area, office area, kitchen, and laundry area. The front yard is well maintained and has a shaded sitting area / gazebo. All resident bedrooms were toured. Each bedroom has a bed, linen, dresser, light, and sufficient closet space. The resident bathrooms have the required grabs bars and non-skid material / mat. The hot water was 120 degrees which is within the required 105 - 120 degrees. The kitchen was inspected. There is sufficient perishable and non-perishable food. All the appliances are clean and seem to be operating properly. Sharps, cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible to residents. Carbon monoxide detectors were in compliance and operational. Fire extinguishers were observed fully charged and last purchased in Feb. of 2024.. LPA observed the centrally stored medication area to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The first aid kit was observed and found to be in compliance with the Title 22 Regulations. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit interview was conducted and the copy of the report was provided to the Administrator .the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2024
Oct 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility failed to properly evaluate the resident Staff failed to provide adequate food service Staff failed to provide activities for resident Staff can’t communicate with residents due to language barrier Staff failed to treat resident with respect
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nune Margaryan conducted a subsequent visit in order to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Marianna Ohanyan and explained the reason for today's visit. Administrator arrived shortly after. The initial visit was conducted on 02/14/22. The investigation consisted of the following: During initial visit, LPA inspected facility kitchen requested and received copies of pertinent documents related to complaint allegations. LPA interviewed total 5 residents (R2 - R6) and 5 staff (S1 - S5). During the investigation R1 was no longer in the facility. During todays visit LPA obtained Residents and Staff roster and copies of R1 hospice care agreement. Cont. 9099C Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation - Facility failed to properly evaluate the resident. It was alleged that on November 2021, based on R1’s weaknesses, Resident #1 (R1) was enrolled in the hospice care without getting consent from POA. At the time of this visit at 9:00 am LPA Margaryan inspected the facility, at 9:15 am LPA requested additional records, including R1’s hospice care agreement. The Administrator indicated that at the time of admission all records were signed by R1. Although, R1’s family member represented themselves as a POA, they never submitted any documents. Hospice agreement was signed by resident. A review of facility records verified the information received from the Administrator. All facility documents were signed by R1. A review of hospice records revealed that the hospice service agreement was also signed by R1 and R1’s evaluation for hospice services was completed by hospice personnel. During this investigation R1 was no longer in the facility. Based on interviews and record review, there is no sufficient information or evidence to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation - Staff failed to provide adequate food service. It was alleged that the facility failed to provide adequate food service for the residents. The food served to R1 was unhealthy as it didn’t contain any protein. During this investigation LPA inspected the facility kitchen and reviewed food supply. On 02/14/2022 LPA observed resident eating lunch. The facility was serving sufficient quantity of well-balanced meal. Lunch consists of chicken w/fresh vegetables bread, and a beverage. An interview of Administrator revealed that based on R1”s health condition, they required physicians approved special diet and the staff was following physician’s order. A review of R1’s records verified the information received from the Administrator. Based on observation, interviews and record review, there is no relevant information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. Cont. 9099C Allegation - Staff failed to provide activities for resident. It was reported that the facility is not providing activities to R1. During this investigation on 02/14/22, while visiting the facility before lunch time LPA observed residents engage in activities. One resident (R2) was watching TV and one resident (R3) was reading a book. In addition, on 02/16/2022, the administrator emailed photographic and videographic evidence of the activities, which clearly shows R1’s engagement to the activities. Interviews of staff and residents’ conducted during investigation indicated that facility is providing activities to the residents. Based on observation, interviews and LPA’s review of the evidence provided by the Administrator, there is no pertinent information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation - Staff can’t communicate with residents due to language barrier. It was alleged that facility staff couldn’t communicate with the residents due to a language barrier. During this investigation on 02/14/2022, LPA spoke with the Administrator, staff and residents. The Administrator was fluently communicating in English. He stated that caregivers may not be fluent. However, they are able to communicate with residents. All interviewed residents during visits had no concerns about staff communicating with them. At the time of visit, LPA spoke with staff, and observed them communicating with residents in English. Based on observation and interviews, there is no sufficient information to corroborate with allegation. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. Cont. 9099C Allegation - Staff failed to treat resident with respect. It was alleged that the staff members were very mean towards R1 and were not taking care of them. The resident needed a chair while going in the shower and the facility failed to provide it to him. During investigation R1 was no longer in the facility. The Administrator denied being disrespectful to R1 or any other resident. Residents interviewed at the facility stated that the staff is very respectful towards them. Interviewed residents did not witnessed staff being disrespectful to R1 or other residents. During this investigation LPA spoke with caregivers who assisted R1 and they stated they always treated R1 with respect. Based on observation and interviews there is no supporting information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. No immediate health and safety hazard is noted during this visit. Exit interview was conducted, appeal rights were discussed, and a copy of report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220204161635
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Touching Hearts Boarding Care
Glendale · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Alameda Board & Care
Glendale · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$3,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
No Place Like Home for Golden Ages 2
Glendale · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$5,200 a month to start · Covelight estimate
No Place Like Home for Golden Ages
Glendale · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$5,250 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Garden Care Home
Burbank · Small home · 1.1 mi away
$5,750 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Alameda Villa
Burbank · Small home · 1.1 mi away
$5,250 a month to start · Covelight estimate