Large community · Licensed for 69 · Pasadena
Arbor Vista
811 E Washington Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91104Licensed since 2000
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Languages spoken: EnglishReported on Caring.com · September 9, 2026
- Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchair
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
LICENSEE PREFERS TO SERVE THE ELDERLY AGES 60 AND ABOVE. FIRST FLOOR ONLY WAS APPROVED FOR NON AMBULATORY. WAIVER TO UTILIZE BELLA VISTA RETIREMENT AS THE FOOD HEADQUARTER TO STORE, PREPARE, SERVE AND TRANSPORT MEALS TO ARBOR VISTA GRANTED. APPROVED FOR (2) HOSPICE CARE.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Activities of daily living the home lists help withSupport and assistance with daily living needs
Reported on seniorlivingatarborvista.com · source dated October 4, 2017.
Diabetes care
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
24-hour supervision claimed
Reported on seniorlivingatarborvista.com · source dated October 4, 2017.
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Arbor Vista: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,050a month to start
Likely $3,150–$5,150
From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$4,050likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,050likely $3,150–$5,150
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,150–$5,350
- $4,050
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,850–$8,550
- $6,550
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,250 to $10,995
11 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,650–$8,100.
- Pasadena HighlandsPasadena · 0.9 mi · Large community$5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- MontecedroAltadena · 1.0 mi · Large community$5,544Listed on its own website · starting rate with entrance fee contract · seen October 27, 2026
- Astoria Park Senior LivingPasadena · 1.0 mi · Large community$3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa GardensPasadena · 1.1 mi · Large community$10,995Listed on its own website · seen October 5, 2026
- Regency Park Oak KnollPasadena · 1.9 mi · Large community$5,950Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Del Mar ParkPasadena · 2.0 mi · Large community$3,250Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Morningstar of PasadenaPasadena · 2.9 mi · Large community$6,825Listed on its own website · assisted living starting rate · seen October 27, 2026
- Prospect ManorSouth Pasadena · 3.9 mi · Large community$5,500Listed on its own website · assisted living, semi-private · seen October 5, 2026
- Ivy Park at San MarinoSan Gabriel · 3.9 mi · Large community$3,995Listed on its own website · private studio & companion suites available floor plans · seen October 27, 2026
- Silverado Senior Living - The HuntingtonAlhambra · 4.4 mi · Large community$8,100Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Kensington Sierra MadreSierra Madre · 4.4 mi · Large community$7,387Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (2)Room types · Common areas
Room typesStudio · Semi-Private
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Common areasIndoor Common Areas
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (3)Meals provided per day · Snacks available · Meals provided
Meals provided per day3
Reported on seniorlivingatarborvista.com · source dated October 4, 2017.
Snacks available
Reported on seniorlivingatarborvista.com · source dated October 4, 2017.
Meals provided
Reported on seniorlivingatarborvista.com · source dated October 4, 2017.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (2)Activity types offered · Religious services off site
Activity types offeredActivities On-site
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Religious services off site
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Faith, culture & language (1)Languages spoken by caregivers
Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (2)Transportation costs extra · Contact form
Transportation costs extraReported no
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
- Open on the website
Contact form
Reported on seniorlivingatarborvista.com · source dated October 26, 2015.
About the home (1)Family-owned claim
Family-owned claim
Reported on seniorlivingatarborvista.com · source dated October 4, 2017.
Where it is
811 E Washington Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91104Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Huntington HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.7 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197602925 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 18 of 26 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated”, 9 “Unsubstantiated” and 3 not transcribed yet.
20264 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file
We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file
We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file
We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff made an inappropriate comment to a resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Blanca Gonzalez conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA Gonzalez was greeted by Administrator Kim Commodore and the purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Gonzalez requested and obtained copies of Resident Roster, Admission Agreement and Physician’s Report, interviewed staff #1-5 (S1- S5) and residents #1-#5 (R1-R5). continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation “Staff made an inappropriate comment to a resident in care,” it was reported that R1 shared that during mealtime R1 was served and slammed "a big pile of food on the table" with staff saying, "so you can stop complaining." Interviews with residents revealed 5 out of 5 residents deny the allegation. R1 stated they did not complain. R1 stated sometimes they have a bad day and will vent but did not complain about staff speaking inappropriately. R1 stated they have no problems with staff and R1 does not feel staff speak inappropriately to residents. R1 stated sometimes staff speak with familiarity, like family, but not inappropriate. R3 stated staff are not inappropriate, “staff treat us good.” Interviews with staff revealed 5 out of 5 staff interviewed deny the allegation. S4 stated residents always talk to S4 and residents have not said anything about staff speaking inappropriately. S1 stated when residents express concerns, the concerns are addressed immediately. S1 stated they had not received any complaints from R1 indicating staff spoke inappropriately. S1 also stated that R1 has no problem with letting staff know when they have a concern. S2 stated staff are careful of the way they speak to residents. LPA observed lunch service and residents were happy and interacted well with serving staff. Based on observation, interviews and record review, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Kim Commodore.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260513171632
20258 state visits · 9 documents
Nov 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is sleeping in the same room as resident.
***This licensing report supersedes the licensing report delivered on 11/18/2025. The purpose of the visit is to add additional information not included in the report dated 11/18/2025. The findings will remain the same. *** On today’s visit, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid spoke with Administrator Kim Commodore and discussed the purpose of the visit. Today's census is 50. On 11/18/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid conducted subsequential visit and met with Administrator-Kim Commodore and discussed the above-mentioned allegations. LPA Vaid and Commodore toured the facility and did not observe any health and safety concerns. On 5/21/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid conducted an initial visit and met with Assistant Administrator Theresa Webb and the reason for the visit was discussed. LPA Vaid and Webb toured the facility and did not observe any health and safety concerns. CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C..... Unsubstantiated The investigation consisted of; review of requested/obtained documents; staff roster, client roster, R1’s face sheet, R1 placement agency contact, R1’s physician report dated 09/09/2025, R1’s medical/health summary dated 08/19/2021, a court ordered examination/competency evaluation dated 03/02/2015, R1’s third party caregivers. Review of R1’s court order dated 04/09/2015. Interviews with staff, residents and witnesses and LPA observations. NOTE: Due to the displacement of individuals from 2025 Eaton Fires, The facility, has been housing residents on an emergency basis, including R1. Regarding the allegation: Staff is sleeping in the same room as a resident. It is alleged that a facility staff person is sleeping in the resident’s room. Five (5) out five (5) staff denied the allegation. Staff interviewed stated that no facility staff person is sleeping in a residents’ room. Staff interviewed stated the R1 is a placement from the Eaton Fire and is a temporary resident since 01/08/25. Three (3) of four (4) witnesses interviewed stated R1 has a court order that was issued in April 2015. The court order allows R1 to be placed in a behavioral facility with constant 1:1 staff supervision that is provided to R1 on 24-hour basis for seven (7) days a week. R1’s placement agency placed R1 in the facility on 01/08/25, as a result of being displaced due to the Eaton Fires and informed the facility administrator of the details of R1’s court order. According to W1, R1 needs continuous and constant 1:1 staff supervision, therefore, per the court order, R1 is assigned two third party caregivers (W2, W3). W2 provides care and supervision to R1 for 24 hours/ 6 days per week and W3 provides care and supervision to R1 for 24 hours/1 day per week. R1’s placement agency assigned W2, W3 a bed in R1’s room to monitor and provide support to R1’s due to R1s behaviors issues. Based on records reviewed, interviews conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted with Administrator Kim Commodore and a copy of LIC 9099, LIC 9099C were provided to Administrator Kim Commodore.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250516103008
Nov 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is yelling at residents.
***This licensing report supersedes the licensing report delivered on 11/18/2025. The purpose of the visit is to add additional information not included in the report dated 11/18/2025 and to reissue the citation. The findings will remain the same and the previous citation issued on 11/18/2025 will be dismissed. *** On today’s visit, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA ) Sanjay Vaid spoke with Administrator Kim Commodore and discussed the purpose of the visit. Today census is ?? On 11/18/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid conducted subsequential visit and met with Administrator Kim Commodore and discussed the above-mentioned allegations. LPA Vaid and Commodore toured the facility and did not observe any health and safety concerns. On 5/21/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid conducted the initial complaint investigation at the facility and was met by Assistant Administrator Theresa Webb, and the reason for the visit was discussed. LPA Vaid and Webb toured the facility and did not observe any health and safety concerns. CONTINUED ON 9099C............... Substantiated The investigation consisted of; review of requested/obtained documents; staff roster, client roster, R1’s face sheet, R1 placement agency contact, R1’s physician report dated 09/09/2025, R1’s medical/health summary dated 08/19/2021, a court ordered examination/competency evaluation dated 03/02/2015, R1’s third party caregivers. Review of R1’s court order dated 04/09/2015. Interviews with staff, residents and witnesses and LPA observations. NOTE: Due to the displacement of individuals from 2025 Eaton Fires, The facility, has been housing residents on an emergency basis, including R1. Regarding the allegation: Staff is yelling at residents. It is alleged that staff are yelling at residents in care. Five (5) of five (5) staff interviewed stated they are not yelling at residents in care. Three (3) of five (5) staff admit to raising their tone of voice to redirect residents, but never to degrade residents. Staff interviewed stated that R1 was displaced due to the Eaton Fire and R1 was placed at the facility on a temporary basis, since, 01/08/25. Staff #4-#5 (S4, S5) are from R1’s prior facility, which is also owned by the licensee. S4 and S5 are employed at R1’s former facility and perform wellness checks on their displaced residents on a weekly basis. Per LPA’s interview with W2, W2 recalls sitting with R1 in facility dining hall when S5 approached R1 about toileting concerns that were occurring during the night. W2 stated witnessing S5 humiliate and ridicule R1 in front of other residents by approaching R1 and offering R1 adult briefs. S5 and R1 began to argue, R1 called S5 degrading names and S5 then yelled at R1. According to W2, several other residents were present and observed the argument. Four (4) of seven (7) residents interviewed stated a few staff have become indifferent since the Eaton Fires and have taken their frustration upon residents. Based on LPAs interviews which were conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the a found Above allegation is be substantiated. Citation is being issued on a LIC 9099D, California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter number 8, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted with Administrator Kim Commodore and a copy of LIC 9099, LIC 9099C and LIC 9099D. Appeals rights discussed and a copy of appeal right were provided to Administrator Kim Commodore. Note Cite Section 87468.1 Personal Rightsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250516103008
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 21, 2025
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a)Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This Requirement was not met by evidence of: Based on interviews, S5 approached R1 and W2 in the dining room and spoke to R1 about R1's nightly accidents causing R1 to feel ridiculed and humiliated in front of other residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator to conduct Personal Rights in-service staff training. Submited in-service training to LPA on 11/25/2025.
Nov 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Mayra Cota, conducted an unnanounced 10-day complaint visit today to investigate the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Kim Commodore, Administrator, and the reason for the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA, obtained copies of staff and resident rosters, toured the facility’s indoor and outdoor environment with a focus on inspecting the ceilings and roof, inspected (14) resident rooms, interviewed Staff 1 – Staff 7 (S1-S7) and Resident 1 – Resident 7 (R1-R7). LPA also conducted record reviews and obtained copies of the facility insurance policy renewal. The investigation revealed the following: ***Continues on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Regarding: Facility is in disrepair. It is alleged that the facility has tarps over several parts of the facility's roof and that there may be leaks in the building which have not been addressed due to the rain. It is also alleged that several utility vans were observed parked close to the facility's main entrance and parking lot. Staffy deny the allegation. Interviews with (7) out of (7) staff indicated that the facility does not have leaks due to the rain. Staff indicated that they have not observed any leaks in any part of the facility. Staff further indicated that residents have not reported any leaks in the common areas of the facility or in resident rooms. Interviews with S1 and S2 indicated that the tarp was placed over the main office area as a preventative measure. S1 and S2 indicated that last year’s rain caused a minor leak in a corner of the main office; however, the leak was repaired, and water did not continue to drip down from the ceiling. S1 and S2 further indicated that maintenance staff conduct on-going checks of the physical plant to ensure that disrepairs get fixed in a timely manner. Interview with S1 indicated that their insurance carrier conducted an inspection in August, 2025, after the city’s fires which happened near the facility. S1 stated that the facility was found to be in good repair, including the roof for the whole building and renewal their policy was issued by their carrier after the inspection was finalized. S1 and S2 also indicated that no immediate repairs were needed and that the vehicles parked outside belong to the city who is rebuilding sidewalks in front of the facility. LPA inspected 14 resident rooms, including the second story part of the building, kitchen, dining area, offices, main activity room, hallways and the building’s roof. LPA observed the ceiling and roof to be free of leaks and there was no indication that water had been filtering in and staining the ceiling. Further inspection indicated that the tarp is placed over the main office area, and the tarp is not covering other parts of the building’s roof. During today’s visit, LPA observed that the utility vehicles were not present during the visit; however, the sidewalk outside of the facility by the parking lot is coned off to prevent pedestrian activity due to work being conducted to restore plumbing under the sidewalk. Signage observed by LPA further indicated that the cones are property of the city. Review of facility’s insurance documents indicated that on 8/22/25, the facility was able to renew their policy for the term ending in 1/1/2026. Policy indicates that the property meets criteria to continue with coverage of the policy as indicated by inspection of the facility, and its findings. Based on interviews, record reviews and observations, the allegation that the facility is in disrepair could not be corroborated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251114120011
Sep 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Christian Gutierrez conducted an unannounced Required-1 year visiting using the full Care Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tools. The purpose of the visit was explained to Assistant Administrator Maria Campos who assisted with today’s visit. Administrator Kim Commodore arrived shortly. The facility is licensed to serve the elderly ages 60 and above. First floor only was approved for non-ambulatory, with a hospice waiver for two (2). Facility has a food preparation waiver. The facility is a two-story building located in a residential/commercial area and consists of 69 rooms with private bathrooms (eight of these rooms are on the second floor), dining room, living room, kitchen, and outdoor patio. Resident bedrooms were randomly chosen for review on 1st and 2nd floor. Each bedroom has a bed, linen, dresser, light, and sufficient closet space. The residents’ bathrooms have the required grab bars and non-skid mats. The hot water was between 106.8-125.2 degrees, which is not within the required 105 - 120 degrees. Fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility. Cleaning supplies and toxic substances are inaccessible to residents on first floor storage room. Kitchen was inspected. There is a sufficient supply of 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food. All the appliances are clean and seem to be operating properly. The common areas include the library, dining room, living room, and patio areas. These areas are clean and have the required furniture. There are no firearms or weapons stored at the facility. All required postings were observed throughout the facility. Sufficient additional linens/towels were observed. The facility does not have a swimming pool or bodies of water on the premises. Passageways and exits are free of obstruction. SEE LIC 809C Five (5) staff files were reviewed and included Criminal clearance record, and health screening with TB. Staff were missing the annual training required. Two (2) out of six (6) residents files were reviewed and included physicians report, TB clearance, and needs and service plan. R1 was missing admission appraisal LIC 603, R2 admission appraisal and appraisal needs and service plan LIC 625, R3 physicians report LIC 602, admission appraisal LIC 603 and appraisal needs and service LIC 625, and R5 was missing admission appraisal LIC 603. Last fire/earthquake drill was conducted in July of 2025. Infectious control plan was reviewed. Two (2) staff, and four (4) residents were interviewed. Random resident medications were reviewed. Medications are centrally stored and locked. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code, the deficiencies observed during the visit are documented on the LIC809Ds. Exit interview was held and a copy of the report along with appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 21, 2025
Jul 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not treat resident with dignity and respect. Staff do not intervene when a resident is bullied by another resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Mayra Cota, conducted an initial 10-day complaint visit to the facility to investigate the allegations mentioned above. LPA Cota, met with Kim Commodore, Administrator, and the reason for the visit was explained. The investigtion consisted of the following: LPA Cota, obtained copies of staff and resident rosters, toured common areas of the facility, including resident rooms, interviewed staff #1-6 (S1-S6) and residents #1-7 (R1-R7). Copy of Special Incident Report was also obtained at the time of visit. ***Continues on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Regarding allegation Staff does not treat resident with dignity and respect. It is alleged that staff did not provide privacy when a resident brought up issues regarding another resident who pesters and bullies resident. It is also alleged that staff interrogated a resident while resident was upset and crying due to emotional distress and embarrassment caused by onlookers at the facility. During visit, interviews with S1-S6 revealed, residents are never interrogated when a concern is brought up to staff. Staff stated, residents can speak openly and are provided privacy to talk about their concerns in the administrative offices in which they can close the door to avoid any information from being divulged to others. Staff also stated, they conduct visits to resident rooms if they need to follow up on concerns privately with residents. Staff further indicated, confidentiality is accorded to residents by letting them report concerns without pressuring them to speak more than they want to share if a problem is reported. S1-S6 stated, they treat all residents with dignity and respect and reassure residents that they can report any concerns they have about staff or residents at any time and will work to bring their concerns to resolution. Interviews with R1-R7 revealed, residents can report concerns to staff confidentially. Residents stated, they know they can speak to administrative staff privately in their offices, privately. Residents also stated, they have no concerns about staff not furnishing private spaces to talk when they have concerns regarding facility staff or residents. Residents further indicated, staff conduct room visits to check in and talk to them privately if needed. Residents also stated, they are treated with respect and dignity by all staff, especially administrative staff. LPA observation indicated, administrative staff have two offices in which residents can visit to talk to staff at any time. The two administrative offices have comfortable space and seating area for residents. Residents were allowed to close the door to the administrator’s office to talk to LPA during time of visit. LPA observation also indicated, staff were observed making regular rounds to resident's rooms during the course of the visit. Staff and resident interviews and LPA observations, do not corroborate the allegation. ***Continues on LIC 9099-C Regarding: Staff do not intervene when a resident is bullied by another resident. It is alleged that resident reported to staff that they are living in a hostile environment due to a resident pestering and bullying resident. Interviews with S1-S7 indicated, they have not witnessed any resident on resident bullying nor any sort of pestering behavior. Staff stated, the facility hardly ever has any incidents in which bullying is reported; however, if concerns are brought up regarding any issues with residents or even with staff, they speak to parties involved privately in administrative offices to work on resolution. Staff indicated, facility informs all residents regarding their rights to report bullying and other issues to staff during Resident Council monthly meetings, and any opportunity to discuss the topic with residents. Staff also indicated that the facility has a reporting grievances policy in place and residents are highly encouraged to report any issue immediately. Interviews with (6) out of (7) residents revealed that they have no concerns regarding bullying or other pestering behaviors either from other residents or staff and furthermore, they have not witnessed bullying or pestering behavior from any residents toward other residents. Six (6) out of (7) residents stated, they like living at the facility and they feel supported by staff, especially the administrator to whom they can express their concerns, and they can talk to privately in the administrative offices to ensure privacy. One (1) resident stated, they do not recall an incident of bullying or pestering behavior toward a resident; however, resident stated, they know they can report any incident to administrative staff at any time. Staff and resident interviews do not corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted, with Kim Commodore and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250702093605
Jun 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure facility is free from pests
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation visit on 06/19/2025 to regarding the above allegation. During today’s visit, LPA Ramirez was greeted by Kim Commodore and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Ramirez requested and obtained copies of Resident/Client Roster, Staff Roster Staff#1 - 4 interviews (S1 – S4), Resident#1-5 interviews (R1-R6), Pest Control Service Invoice dated 6/13/25, and physical plant tour. See 9099-C Substantiated The investigation revealed the following regarding the allegation: “Staff do not ensure facility is free from pests” It is alleged pests have been observed in the facility kitchen. Staff interviews conducted corroborated this allegation. Resident interviews conducted corroborated this allegation. During tour of kitchen area, LPA Ramirez observed several small black/brown pellet droppings under a wire shelf rack, and on top of canned goods in the facility pantry area. Although the facility maintains pest control services, interviews with staff revealed the facility has been unable to eliminate rodents from the kitchen area for at least 6 months. Interview with Administrator Commodore revealed the facility receives pest control services twice a month as part of routine maintenance but is still unable to eradicate rodents from the kitchen. This poses a immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care. Per Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, Article 10- General Food Service Requirements- 87555(b)(2)- (b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (27) All kitchen areas shall be kept clean and free of litter, rodents, vermin and insects. Based on interviews and observations, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. LPA Ramirez will issue one (1) type A deficiency. A copy of this report, 9099-D and appeals rights was provided. Exit interview was conducted. The investigation revealed the following regarding the allegation: “Staff do not treat resident with respect.” It is alleged staff do not treat resident with respect. Staff interviews conducted did not corroborate this allegation. Resident interviews conducted did not corroborate this allegation. During facility tour, LPA Ramirez observed staff-resident interactions were warm, respectful, and responsive to resident’s needs. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250611155959
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(27) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 20, 2025
87555 General Food Service Requirements (b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (27) All kitchen areas shall be kept clean and free of litter, rodents, vermin and insects. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPA's observations of rodent droppings in kitchen and staff and resident interviews corroborating allegation. This poses a immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator Kim Commodore agreed to send a plan to address how the facility plans to keep the kitchen area free from rodents. Proof from pest control services that the facility kitchen area is free from rodents, is due by July 1, 2025. Proof must be sent via email to LPA Ramirez.
Jun 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff spoke inappropriately to resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Kim Commodore, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA reviewed and obtained copies of the staff & resident rosters, Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) in service training logs (Clients rights) and Write up/Consultation (dated 06/12/2025), Incident report (dated 04/14/2025), Pasadena Police information (Officer #5472) and Resident #1 (R1) - Resident #2 (R2) pertinent files. LPA also interviewed Staff #1 (S1) - Staff #4 (S4) and Resident #1 (R1) - Resident #6 (R6). In regards to the allegation "Staff spoke inappropriately to resident", it is alleged that approximately 2 months ago, R1 heard a loud noise from R2's room and found R2 on the floor under a walker. R1 helped and called for help. S1 entered and aggressively told R1 to move, while S2 also scolded R1. S1 continued to berate and embarrassed R1 for interfering in front of other residents in the dining area. It is also alleged that on 06/08/2025, when R1 asked S1 for more food, S1 responded, "You’re gonna get fat!" ******CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C***** Unsubstantiated Interviews conducted with (4) out of (4) staff members all denied the allegation. Staff members interviewed stated that they are naturally loud speakers, but they did not intend any disrespect to residents. Some staff also indicated that because some residents have hearing issues, they need to speak louder for them to hear. S4 denied the allegation regarding the incident on 06/08/2025 and stated that they did not body shame or make inappropriate comments to any residents. (5) out of (6) residents interviewed denied the allegation and indicated that staff treat them with respect and have not spoken improperly to them. LPA did not observe staff being disrespectful to residents, being loud or speaking in loud voices. Based on statements and interviews conducted with residents and staff as well as reviewed files and documentation, there was not enough supportive evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided to Kim Commodore, Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250611092527
Mar 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff abandoned resident at hospital.
LPA Vaid conducted an Initial 10-Day complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA was met by Thersa Webb, Assistant Administrator. Administrator Kim Commodore joined shortly after. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility with Administrator and did not observe any health and safety concerns. Investigation consisted of the following: interview of Staff #1 - Staff #5 (S1-S5); interviews of clients from client#1 through client #6 (C1-C6); requested, obtained, and reviewed client #1(C1) clients face sheet and ID, physicians report, client notes, house rules and admissions agreement. Staff roster and client roster. Regarding the allegation: Staff abandoned resident at hospital. It is alleged that the facility staff had abandoned client at the hospital after client was sent to hospital for medical and psych evaluations after being involved in incidents at the facility on 03/16/25 and 03/17/25. Continued on 9099C...... Unsubstantiated Witness 1 interviewed stated that their family member has substance problem, are trying to seek help through rehabilitation however the client is reluctant to go to the rehab program after claiming they need help. Witness 2 stated, that the facility did allow client to return after discharge from hospital on 03/17 and 03/18. Five (5) out of six (6) clients interviewed could not corroborate this allegation. Clients interviewed stated they saw the police and paramedics in the facility however do not know why they were there. One client stated they saw the client in their room on the 03/17 and 03/18 being unruly. Five (5) out of five (5) staff interviewed denied this allegation. According to Administrator Kim Commodore the client has had previous issues with violating house rules and admissions agreement. On 03/16, client was found with drugs and drug parahelia and was sent to the hospital by police and paramedics after being becoming aggressive and confrontational, client was released from the hospital and was allowed back to the facility. On 03/17/25, client was again aggressive and combative with staff and other facility clients. Clients were complaining of the unruly noise and breaking of furniture, staff call PET team to take client on 51/50 hold. PET team and staff found client unresponsive in their room and called 911. Police and paramedics came to the facility and announced client had drug overdose. Client was transported to the Hospital and police reports were made on 03/16 -PA 2025-20784 and 03/17-PA 2025-20814 respectively, family was notified of each incident. Kim Commodore stated, after speaking with clients’ family on 03/18/25 about the house rules and agreements violated and this being the clients first incident, the client would be able return to the facility. On Administrator Kim provided the client and their family with rehab facility options. On 03/21/25 Administrator Kim last spoke to client, he was going to phone company to get new phone, client was accompanied by staff to the phone company. On 03/22/25, while client was allegedly supposed to be in rehab. Staff discovered client had been at Arbor Vista facility destroying the room and ran away, staff called police and family was notified. Currently, client is at the hospital having been found overdosed by family member on 03/23/25 who are trying to admit client to the rehab facility. Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Copy of this report was provided to Administrator Kim Commodore.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250319104152
Jan 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vaid conducted an unannounced Case Management Health Checks visit regarding the evacuation of the residents from Bella Vista Lincoln facility. Administrator stated that on 1/13/25, facility at Arbor Vista 811 E Washington Blvd, Pasadena 91104. License # 197602925 started to receive eleven (11) residents/clients from Bella Vista Lincoln a licensed facility, 2612 N Lincoln Ave, Altadena 91001. Additionally, to conduct a health and checks visit regarding the Eaton fire incident on the relocation of (11) residents from facility Bella Vista at Lincoln, 2612 N. Lincoln Ave., Altadena, CA. 91001 - License # 198602253 to Arbor Vista 811 E Washington Blvd., Pasadena, CA. 91104 - License # 197602925 on 1/13/25. LPA met with Administrator, Kim Commodore and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA Vaid conducted a health and safety check and no concerns observed. LPA reviewed and obtained the resident and staff rosters. Per interview with the Administrator eleven (11) residents of Bella Vista Lincoln relocated to the facility on 01/13/2025. (4) resident is still with family members and are expected to be back in the facility by the end to the weekend. LPA toured the facility, inspected random residents' bedrooms and bathrooms. LPA observed kitchen to be clean and orderly. Facility was offering bottled water as the tap water is undrinkable until 01/14/25. LPA interviewed random residents and indicated that they are aware and were instructed not to use tap water. Facility is now okay to use tap water as per Fire Advisory. The facility has sufficient beds, hygiene supplies, beddings, linens, and everyone has a designated room. The kitchen has sufficient two-day perishable and seven-day non-perishable food supplies. The kitchen staff will be serving food using plates and utensils. Administrator posted signs on the elevator and common areas to remind residents not to use/consume tap water, until 01/14/2025. Medications, MARs, and files of the (11) residents that have been transferred to Arbor Vista in Pasadena were brought with them and stored in a secured place. All Bella Vista at Lincoln residents are fully ambulatory, use no assistive devices, and do not require any incontinent care. There is sufficient staffing available to provide care for residents. Five (5) staff from Bella Vista Lincoln have on the premises assisting the facility. ***Continued on LIC 809-C***....... Per the Administrator, it has been verified that a routine fire inspection and testing was completed on 12/30/2024 and fire drill was conducted with staff on 12/18/2024. Administrator has extra supply of masks and gloves. LPA informed the Administrator to reach out to CCL if any resources or assistance is needed. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Kim Commodore.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) S Vaid conducted the required annual inspection. LPA met with Kim Commodore, Administrator and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. The facility is licensed to serve the elderly ages 60 and above. First floor only was approved for non-ambulatory, with a hospice waiver for two (2). The facility is a two story building located in a residential/commercial area and consist of 69 rooms with private bathrooms (eight of this rooms are in the second floor), dining room, living room, a kitchen, an outdoor patio. Infection Control: There are using appropriate hand hygiene and wearing gloves while assisting clients. Staff are cleaning and disinfecting often for high touched surfaces. Facility has an Infection Control Plan in place. Operational Requirements: The fire clearance is approved for first floor only approved for non-ambulatory, with a hospice waiver for two (2). Staff are adhering to operational requirements. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: LPAs toured facility grounds. Smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were observed. Both, smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and operable. Four fire extinguishers are located throughout the premises (service date of 02/05/2024). Water temperature measured as per Title 22 regulations, within 105-120 degree F. Bathrooms had non-skid surfaces and grab bars. Knives, cleaning solutions, and disinfectants are locked and inaccessible to clients. Staffing: Facility has reasonable staffing; staff was observed assisting residents with their activities and housekeeping duties cleaning rooms and commons areas. Continued on 809C.......... Personnel Records-Training: Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA reviewed staff files for S-1 through Staff #3 (S1-S3). Staff have their Health Screening and Tuberculosis Screening on file. Administrator license 7033366735 expires 10/10/2025. Resident Rights-Information: Resident rights are included in Resident files. The let-us-no and ombudsman posters were observed to be posted in the TV room. Planned Activities: Activity schedule/calendar is posted inside the activity room. There is an activity coordinator and activity assistant for this facility on weekly basis. Food Service: Dining area has adequate seating. Plates, cups and utensils are kept cleaned and stored properly. There are sufficient food supplies of 2-day perishable and 7-day of non-perishable items. The food is properly stored in the refrigerator. Posted menu observed on the refrigerator. Emergency food supply on 2nd floor. Pesticides and cleaning supplies are kept away from the food preparation areas. Kitchen is kept clean and free from rodents and other vermin. Incidental M&D: The medications are centrally stored in the medication room and in bubble packs and/or original containers. Medications are administered as prescribed by the Physician. LPA reviewed four (4) residents medications, all medications are being administered as per physicians directions and orders. Resident Records-Incident Reports: LPA reviewed Resident files for Resident #1 (R-1) to resident #4(R-4). Resident files are maintained at the facility. Admission Agreement, Physician's Report (including T.B and Ambulatory Status), Consent for Medical Treatment, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Resident Pre-Appraisal, Functional Capabilities, ALW assessment and Resident Rights were observed. Resident files were inspected, and emergency contact information and health screenings were up to date for all residents. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has the Emergency Disaster Plan in place. Safety drills held monthly and quarterly with random drills types. Three time per day on each shift. No deficiencies noted on today's visit. Exit interview was held with Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2024
Mar 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not treat residents with dignity and respect. Staff yells at residents.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Luis Mora conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to determine the validity of the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Kim Commodore (Director) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Mora obtained copies of the resident and staff rosters, interviewed Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 3 (S1 - S3) and Resident 1 - Resident 10 (R1 - R10). The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegations "staff do not treat residents with dignity and respect" and "staff yells at residents", it is alleged that the Administrator and S1 yell at the residents, and that S1 glares and bullies the residents. Administrator and staff denied the allegations. The majority of the residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit interview held and a copy of the report was provided Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240307075653
Mar 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure safe keeping of a resident's personal property and cash.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Angelica Rea and Christian Gutierrez conducted an initial complaint visit in response to the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Kim Commodore, who assisted with today's visit. Regarding the allegation that : Staff did not ensure safe keeping of a resident's personal property and cash. The investigation consisted of review of resident #1s file, interviews with Administrator, Staff #1 - Staff #4 and interviews with Resident #1 - Resident # 5. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. Four out of five residents stated that staff do ensure the safe keeping of resident's personal property and cash. Four out of five residents stated that none of their belongings have ever been missing while they have lived at the facility. Staff interviewed denied the allegation. Administrator and four out of four staff stated that resident property and cash are safeguarded. Unsubstantiated Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240227094830
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff made derogatory/racial statements towards resident. Staff yells at residents. Staff does not treat residents with dignity and respect.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Galarza conducted an initial 10-day complaint visit regarding the above allegations. The purpose of the visit was explained to Administrator Kim Commodore. The investigation consisted of: A physical plant inspection of the facility, record review, and interviews with staff (S1- S6) and residents (R2- R10). Resident (R1) was not interviewed because they are hospitalized as a result of behavior incident dated 12/11/2023. The following documents were obtained:R1's Face Sheet, Admission Agreement/packet, Physician Report, medication list, Welbe Health Pacific Pace provider agreement, three (3) incident reports, Client Notes, LIC, LIC 500 Personnel Report, and resident roster. See LIC 9099C for report continuation. Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff made derogatory/racial statements towards resident. It is alleged a day shift staff (S2) has called resident (R1) a racial slur using the "N" word and also called them a "bald headed B word." A total of nine (9) residents were interviewed, of which two (2) residents stated that they have heard staff say derogatory words to residents. The residents did not want to disclose what was said, or the name(s) of staff. One (1) resident reported that R1 has cussed and threatened them. A total of six (6) staff were interviewed. All staff denied the allegation. They stated that resident (R1) is uncooperative and verbally, as well as physically aggressive towards staff. Staff reported that R1 says derogatory words/names to staff. It was also reported that R1 hit med-tech staff (S4's) forearm with the housekeeper's broom. None of the staff have heard other staff say derogatory words towards R1 or other residents. Per Client Notes, R1 has history of using derogatory words towards staff and residents, and not vice versa. There is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Allegation: Staff yells at residents. It is alleged that Administrator (S1) has been overheard yelling/screaming at residents and stating "If you don't like how I do things there's the door." The date(s) of the alleged yelling is unknown. A total of nine (9) residents were interviewed of which three (3) stated that they have heard Administrator yell down the hallway at residents in general, because they refused to stay in their rooms during a recent COVID virus outbreak isolation period. All staff denied the allegation, and acknowledged that Administrator has a loud voice tone that could be misconstrued as yelling, but when residents are addressed in a loud voice it is never in a disrespectful manner. Staff (S1) stated that they talk loud to both residents and staff, but never in a shouting or screaming manner. LPA confirmed that S1's natural voice tone is loud and residents are addressed in a respectful manner. Based on interviews conducted, the findings indicate that S1/Administrator's voice is boisterous but professional. Allegation: Staff does not treat residents with dignity and respect. According to information obtained it is alleged that facility staff speak to residents "like babies" and residents do not like it. Based on interviews conducted the allegation could not be supported because only one (1) resident out of nine (9) residents interviewed stated that S1 and S5 address residents in a babyish way because they try too hard to treat residents well. In addition, the resident stated that staff (S4) has been overheard getting impatient with residents and whining about residents. All staff interviewed stated they treat all residents with dignity and respect, and some residents are addressed in a more sweet and parental manner because they respond better to that approach, and it uplifts their mood and self esteem. LPA observed satisfactory staff treatment towards residents, as well as good rapport. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. An exit interview and a copy of the report was issued to Administrator Kim Commodore.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231212110800
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 8 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 10, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced annual visit at the facility using the CARE tool. LPA met with Teresa Webb and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator arrived 15 minutes later. The facility is licensed to serve the elderly ages 60 and above. First floor only was approved for non-ambulatory, with a hospice waiver for two (2). Facility has a food preparation waiver. The facility is a two story building located in a residential/commercial area and consist of 69 rooms with private bathrooms (eight of this rooms are in the second floor), dining room, living room, a kitchen, an outdoor patio. LPA conducted a tour with Teresa Webb and observed the following: The facility is in good repair indoor and outdoor. The living/dining area is clean and has sufficient seating furniture in good repair. The fireplace located in the living room is covered. The kitchen was observed with... LPA observed 5 resident rooms each had sufficient lighting, the required furniture and bedding supplies. Each bathroom was observed clean, in good repair, with skid mats, and grab bars. Water temperature was tested in each bathroom between 105.8-111.3 degrees F. which is within the required 105-120 degrees F. No large bodies of water were observed. Patio has sufficient shaded seating area. Mediation room was observed locked. Cleaning supplies were inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and medication, and 5 staff files. Administrator certificate was observed for KIm Commodore #6018823740 exp: 10/10/24. LPA interview 3 residents and 3 staff. No deficiencies were noted during this visit. Exit interview was conducted with Kim Commodore Administrator and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2023
20226 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 9, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff provide care and supervision while under the influence of drugs Staff do not properly assist residents with their medications Staff speak inappropriately to residents in care
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Kim Commodore and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to deliver the findings for the above allegations from original complaint dated 10/25/2021. Initial visit was conducted 1/02/2021 which included interviews with Administrator, Staff #1- Staff # 3 and a subsequent visit was conducted on 12/01/2021 which included Resident's 1-8 who were interviewed. In regards to the allegation Staff provide care and supervision while under the influence of drugs, based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed by interviews with residents that Staff S1 is a good worker and is nice to them. Stated they have never seen him drinking or doing drugs. Said he is very good and helpful and professional. Stated that the Administrator would never put up with that. Staff interviewed stated that S1 does a professional job and is good to the resident and will work all day alongside him and never seen him under the influence of drugs. Staff also stated that the Administrator would never put up with that. Unsubstantiated Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. In regards to the allegation Staff do not properly assist residents with their medications, based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed in interviews with residents that Staff are good with meds. They have never received anyone elses meds and never gotten wrong meds. Two residents here 4 and 12 years stated they had never missed a medication. Staff interviewed stated that all medications are administered properly and no one at any time will get someone elses medication. Stated that there are occasions where residents have forgotten they were already given medication and say they didn't get it. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. In regards to the allegation Staff speak inappropriately to residents in care, based on interviews conducted and information gathered residents interviewed stated that S1 is not inappropriate and has not used bad language. Said they have not heard staff talk negatively to residents. Stated that staff may have to be stern with certain residents, but never are inappropriate using bad language and Administrator would never put up with that. Staff interviewed stated that they have never seen or observed anything inappropriate. Said there is an In service and they first thing they say is if you see something you say something. There is a hotline with the company to report anything. Also stated Administrator would not put up with it and there is zero tolerance and any negative concerns are addressed immediately with the Administrator. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2022 · control 28-AS-20211025135008
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(c)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 9, 2022
Personnel Requirements - General All RCFE staff who assist residents with personal activities of daily living shall receive initial and annual training as specified in Health and Safety Code sections 1569.625 and 1569.69 Policies and procedures regarding medications, including the knowledge in Section 87411(d)(4). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted facility failed to have Staff S2 receive medication training which caused an Immediate Health and Safety Risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2022
Plan of correction: Facility Administrator submitted medication certificate for Staff S2. Deficiency cleared.
Nov 28, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted an unannounced required annual continuation visit. LPA was greeted and met by the Administrator, Kim Commodore and Med-Tech/Administrative Assistant, Ashley Ganther and explained the purpose of today's visit. Today's visit will continue to focus on Infection Control Domain. The facility is licensed to serve the elderly ages 60 and above. First floor only was approved for non-ambulatory. The current census is 48 ambulatory residents, zero (0) non-ambulatory, 26 total number of staff. The initial annual visit was conducted by LPA Pena on 11/21/2022. During the initial visit the following was inspected, reviewed and toured: The main entrance (front door) was used as the central entry point for everyone. A check in station was set up by the entrance and Covid-19 symptom screening was initiated at entry, where LPA was screened. COVID-19 Infection Control screening protocols and supplies, PPE supplies, and sign-in sheet were observed. COVID-19 signage was placed in several areas of the facility. Lobby, receiving area, dining area, kitchen rooms, living room, dining room, kitchen are all located in the first floor. Staff on duty including the Administrator wore face masks. Facility has 30 days of PPE supplies. PPE supplies are stored in the Emergency Food Storage Room in the 2nd floor. Knives and other sharp items are stored in the kitchen drawer. The kitchen has 3 entry/exit points which are kept locked at all times. Sufficient food supply of 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable were observed. The kitchen has 3 freezers, 2 freezer store the meats and the other freezer stores the vegetables and fruits. The kitchen has a walk in freezer and refrigerator. The fire extinguishers located around the facility were all inspected on 3/01/22. Hot water temperature was measured in 3 random rooms and read at 108.7 deg F (Room 17), 118.2 deg. F (Room 33) and 106.9 deg F (Room 6), all are within the required range of 105-120 degree Fahrenheit. During today's annual visit, LPA Pena along with the Administrator inspected the following: Entire physical plant outdoor and indoor Outdoor and indoor passageways and exit doors Random residents bedrooms in main floor There are cameras in the common areas, entrance, parking lot and outside of the building. There were no cameras seen in private areas. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are operable. Medication records for six (6) random residents. Medications were locked and centrally stored in a medication room located in the main floor which are inaccessible to residents. Three (3) random Staff records/files. Staff files were inspected and contained the required health screenings, criminal record clearances, and training. Five (5) random Resident records/files. Resident files were inspected, and emergency contact information and health screenings were up to date for all residents. The annual required visit is complete. Per Title 22 Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the initial and continuation visits. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator, Kim Commodore.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 28, 2022
Nov 21, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 4:05pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted an annual inspection with the focus of the Infection Control Practice domain. LPA Pena met with the Administrator, Kim Commodore who allowed entry to the facility and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to serve the elderly ages 60 and above. First floor only was approved for non-ambulatory. The current census is 48 ambulatory residents, zero (0) non-ambulatory, 26 total number of staff. At 4:20pm, LPA and the Administrator toured the facility and observed/inspected the following: This facility is a 2-story building which consists of 69 rooms, of which 62 room are located in the 1st floor and 7 rooms in the 2nd floor. Every room is a private room, no shared room The main entrance (front door) is used as the central entry point for everyone. A check in station is set up by the entrance and Covid-19 symptom screening is initiated at entry, where LPA was screened. COVID-19 Infection Control screening protocols and supplies, PPE supplies, and sign-in sheet were observed. COVID-19 signage was placed in several areas of the facility. Lobby, receiving area, dining area, kitchen rooms, living room, dining room, kitchen are all located in the first floor. Staff on duty including the Administrator wore face masks. Facility has 30 days of PPE supplies. PPE supplies are stored in the Emergency Food Storage Room in the 2nd floor. Knives and other sharp items are stored in the kitchen drawer. The kitchen has 3 entry/exit points which are kept locked at all times. Sufficient food supply of 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable were observed. The kitchen has 3 freezers, 2 freezer store the meats and the other freezer stores the vegetables and fruits. The kitchen has a walk in freezer and refrigerator. The fire extinguisher was last inspected on 3/01/22. Hot water temperature was measured in 3 random rooms and read at 108.7 deg F (Room 17), 118.2 deg. F (Room 33) and 106.9 deg F (Room 6), all are within the required range of 105-120 degree Fahrenheit. No deficiencies observed during the time of this visit. The facility is operating within compliance. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator, Kim Commodore. ***Due to time constraints, LPA was not able to complete the annual inspection for this facility. LPA will do a continuation of this inspection.***the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2022
Sep 29, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not ensure that resident was adequately fed. Facility staff did not notify resident’s representative of a change in the resident’s condition in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)/Retired Annuitant (RA) Elizabeth Ceniceros made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator (A1: Kim Commodore). LPA/RA spoke to A1 prior to entering the facility to conduct a risk assessment. A1 informed LPA/RA that the facility has no COVID cases nor do any of the residents or staff have symptoms. The purpose of today’s visit is to conduct a subsequent visit and to deliver the findings pertaining to the above-mentioned allegations. An initial 10-Day visit was conducted by LPA Angelica Rea on 09/20/21. LPA/RA Ceniceros re-interviewed (between 1:00 p.m. - 1:30 p.m.) two (2) staff members (A1 & S1). LPA/RA did not interview (former) Resident #1; as the resident did not return to the facility following hospitalization on 09/13/21. LPA/RA reviewed (between 1:45: p.m. – 2:15 p.m. the requested documents: Emergency I.D. and Information, Physician’s Report, Resident Appraisal, Functional Capability Assessment, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, and Pre-hospital Care Report for Resident #1 (R1); including police reporting of local law enforcement, Unusual Incident/Injury Report, Facility Staff and Residents rosters, and weekly menu. Unsubstantiated Regarding Allegation #1: this investigation revealed a review of R1's "Physician Report" (dated 11/10/19) documented under "Mental Condition" Able to communicate Needs: Yes; under "Capacity for Self Care" Resident able to feed self: Yes. A review of the "Resident Appraisal" (dated 01/23/20) documented under the "Services Needed" Help with eating (need for adaptive devices or assistance from another person): No. A review of R1's "Functional Capability Assessment" (dated 01/23/20) documented under "Eating" that the resident feeds self completely and under "Communication" that the resident expresses self verbally. A review of R1's "Appraisal Needs and Services Plan" (dated 01/23/20) documented that facility staff will monitor the resident to ensure that the resident is using their independent skills. A review of the facility's weekly menu documented the daily diet to be of quality necessary to meet the needs of the residents. The facility has an approved Waiver to utilize Bella Vista Retirement (#197608297) as the food headquarter to store, prepare, serve, and transport meals to Arbor Vista was granted by CCLD. LPA/RA reviewed Witness #1 [local law enforcement police report (dated 09/13/21)] attempts made by W1 & W3 to encourage R1 to eat the food served at the facility; however, R1 refused food service. Resident #1 was also encouraged to go and see a doctor to be assessed; however, the resident refused medical services. W1 & W3 notified W4. Interviews conducted by facility staff corroborated that R1 had stopped eating for five (5) days and refused medical treatment from doctors. Facility Staff contacted (9-1-1) to respond to the facility as Resident #1 was later transported to the hospital on 09/13/21. A review of the "Pre-hospital Care Report" (dated 09/13/21) documented that the patient (R1) was advised multiple times by assisted-living staff to go with transport (9-1-1) to the hospital; but, patient (R1) repeatedly refused and stated that this was too much for the patient (R1) right now. Patient (R1) was advised of risks and consequences and advised to seek alternative medical care. Patient (R1) understood the consequences of refusal of medical services by hospital staff. Patient (R1) signed an AMA (against medical advice). Resident #1 did not return to the facility following hospital discharge. Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of NEGLECT/LACK OF SUPERVISION: Facility did not ensure that resident was adequately fed is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding Allegation #2: this investigation revealed a review of R1's "Emergency I.D. and Information" (dated 11/23/09) documented that Resident #1 is their own responsible person and present/legal guardian. A review of the "Unsual Incident/Injury Report" (dated 09/13/21) documented the incident and immediate action taken by facility staff (including persons notified) that included R1's family member (Witness #2) and CCLD. Interviews conducted by facility staff corroborated that R1 was their own responsible person; but, R1 did have family. Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: Facility staff did not notify resident’s representative of a change in the resident’s condition in a timely manner is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview has been conducted and a copy of the Complaint Report was provided to the Administrator, Kim Commodore.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2022 · control 28-AS-20210916162357
Jul 6, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident is being illegally evicted from the facility. Facility did not ensure that resident was receiving their medication while in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Staff, Willa Mae, and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator, Kim Commodore, arrived at 10:40 a.m. to assist with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of Staff roster, Resident Roster, and documents for Resident #1. LPA interviewed the Administrator, 2 Staff, and 5 Residents. During the visit today, LPA also reviewed the medication log for 5 residents. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation – Resident is being illegally evicted from the facility. Administrator Commodore denied serving an eviction notice to Resident #1 (R-1). Unsubstantiated She stated that although R-1 has not been paying the rent in full, she has not given any eviction letter. The 2 Staff interviewed stated that there were no eviction letters given to any residents. LPA interviewed R-1 who stated an eviction notice was given about 2 weeks ago and cannot recall if it was signed. R-1 was unable to provide a copy of the notice for verification. LPA interviewed R-1’s family member who is unaware of any eviction letter given to R-1 and is seeking for a place with higher level of care for R-1. LPA reviewed R-1’s file and did not observe any eviction letter. LPA interviewed 4 other residents and only one stated an eviction letter was given about 2 ½ years ago. There is no supportive evidence to concur with this allegation. Allegation – Facility did not ensure that resident was receiving their medication while in care. Administrator and Staff interviewed stated that the residents are all medication compliant. They take their medications daily and at the prescribed time. The Med Tech stated the medications are distributed in the medication room. The residents come down during their medication times and if a resident does not go during the medication period which rarely happens, the Med Tech will take it to them. LPA interviewed 5 residents and all 5 stated they take their medications daily. LPA reviewed the medication for 5 residents and it appears that the medications are administered in accordance with the physician’s orders. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with the Administrator. A copy of this report along with the appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 6, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220630091412
Apr 15, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Reporting Requirements
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Galarza conducted a subsequent complaint visit regarding the above allegation and delivered findings. The purpose of the visit was explained to Administrator Kim Commodore. The investigation consisted of: On 4/12/22, LPA Galarza and Associate Governmental Program Analyst (AGPA) Michael Moriel conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed staff (S1-S5), and resident (R1). The following documents were obtained pertaining to R1: Face Sheet, Physician Report, ALW ISP, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, incident reports, SNF & hospital discharge documents, LIC 500 Personnel Report, and resident roster. Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) and Home Health staff were interviewed. During today's visit, residents (R2- R9) were interviewed. See LIC 9099C for report continuation. Substantiated Allegation: "Reporting Requirements". Resident (R1) returned to the facility from a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) on April 1, 2022. It is alleged that on 4/3/2022 the resident had an unwitnessed fall and was not sent to the hospital for further evaluation. Staff interviews indicated that if a resident falls and hurts themselves they are sent to the hospital for an evaluation. Administrator stated that sometimes residents refuse to go to the hospital, 911 Emergency is called anyway for an evaluation, and if the resident refuses they are not transported. Resident (R1's) Durable Power of Attorney stated incidents are reported in a timely manner. In regards to the incidents addressed on this complaint resident (R1) fell on 4/3/2022 but did not require medical treatment. An Incident report regarding resident (R1's) fall was completed, but not faxed to Licensing. A copy was obtained. It is alleged resident (R1) sustained a minor toe injury because staff (S1) accidentally stepped on the resident's toe during bed transfer. The resident stated that it did not report the injury to any staff and they were made aware of the injury until 4/4/2022. Resident (R1) could not recall when the toe injury occurred. On 4/4/2022 a home health staff observed the toe injury and reported it to Administrator and staff (S1). Facility staff were not aware of the toe injury. As of 4/12/2022 an incident report had not been submitted to Community Care Licensing. LPA obtained a copy of the toe injury incident report during 4/15/2022 site visit, past the seven days Title 22 reporting requirement. Administrative Assistant staff acknowledged that it forgot to send the toe injury incident report. Based on record review and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiency is cited. See LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator Kim Commodore. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220408164558
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 22, 2022
Reporting Requirements. A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below.... This requirement was not met evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews conducted the facility failed to report R1's fall incident dated 4/3/22, and toe injury dated 4/4/22. Staff acknowledged it forgot to submit the incident report. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to conduct staff training on reporting requirements and send a copy of the inservice training log to LPA by POC due date
Apr 15, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Verbal abuse
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Galarza conducted a subsequent complaint visit regarding the above allegation and delivered findings. The purpose of the visit was explained to Administrator Kim Commodore. The investigation consisted of: On 4/12/22, LPA Galarza and Associate Governmental Program Analyst (AGPA) Michael Moriel conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed staff (S1-S5), and resident (R1). The following documents were obtained pertaining to R1: Face Sheet, Physician Report, ALW ISP, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, incident reports, SNF & hospital discharge documents, LIC 500 Personnel Report, and resident roster. Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) and Home Health staff were interviewed. During today's visit, residents (R2- R9) were interviewed. See LIC 9099C for report continuation. Unsubstantiated Allegation: "Verbal Abuse". It is alleged that on April 4, 2022 ,caregiver staff (S1) became upset and was yelling in front of resident (R1), visitor, and Administrator when questioned about a toe injury that was observed in resident (R1's) left toe. It is also alleged that the Administrator also became upset and raised its' voice, as it had not been made aware of the toe injury. The resident sustained a minor trauma wound on the left toe (picture obtained). Resident (R1) stated that staff (S1) accidentally stepped on the toe during wheelchair to the bed transfer. The resident stated that it did not realize the toe was injured until April 4, 2022, and did not report it staff (S1) or Administrator because it loves and respects staff (S1). Resident (R1) denied being verbally abused by staff (S1) and/or any other staff. Five (5) out of five (5) staff interviewed denied the allegation. Staff (S1) denied verbal abuse and yelling at resident, but did admit that it always talks loud, especially towards resident (R1) because the resident is hard of hearing and sometimes does not have its' hearing aids on. Nine (9) out of nine (9) residents interviewed denied verbal abuse by staff (S1) or other staff. On 4/12/22, LPA interviewed resident (R1) and confirmed that R1 has severe hearing loss, wears hearing aids, and must be talked to in a loud voice. Resident (R1) stated she is very happy and grateful for the care that staff (S1) provides. Resident (R1's) Durable Power of Attorney stated R1 is treated well by staff (S1), and confirmed R1 is hard of hearing. Therefore, staff must speak to the resident in a loud tone. Based on interviews conducted and document review, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore all the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Kim Commodore. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220408164558
46 of 69 beds were occupied at the May 19, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Robsag Inc., licensed since 2000.
Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Bella Vista · Pasadena
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2000, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 27
- Total complaints
- 16
- Substantiated allegations
- 5
- Type A citations
- 3
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2000, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 3 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 5 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 16 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Arbor Vista
Is Arbor Vista licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Arbor Vista licensed for?
69 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Arbor Vista been cited?
3 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2000, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 27 state visits over the same years.
Is Arbor Vista still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 10, 2026.
What does Arbor Vista cost?
$4,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,150–$5,150. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Pasadena that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $6,825 a month, and the middle figure is $5,725 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Arbor Vista take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Robsag Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Robsag Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Huntington Hospital is 2.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Arbor Vista keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Arbor Vista license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ARBOR VISTA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197602925. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 69 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Robsag Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2000, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 27 state inspection visits since 2000, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 3 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2000, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 27 state visits in that period.
- 16 complaints and 5 substantiated allegations on file since 2000, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 5, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$8,250 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,400 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,250–$7,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,550 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,350–$8,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,700–$8,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,250–$5,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,450–$7,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County