Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Angels Senior Care Home
Small home·Licensed for 6·San Jose, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,300 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedFebruary 15, 2024 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitJanuary 14, 2026CDSS inspection record
Angels Senior Care Home is a small care home in San Jose — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2006. Dementia care and hospice care are not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Angels Senior Care Home
Is Angels Senior Care Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Angels Senior Care Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Angels Senior Care Home been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Angels Senior Care Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Angels Senior Care Home cost?
$4,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,300. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 20 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Jose that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,525 to $4,875 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Angels Senior Care Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Angels Senior Care Home, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Santa Clara Valley Medical Center is 2.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Angels Senior Care Home keep a resident on hospice?
Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”
Angels Senior Care Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ANGELS SENIOR CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #435294178. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Angels Senior Care Home, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is January 14, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 5 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
- BedriddenApproved by the state
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. LICENSED FOR FIVE NON-AMBULATORY CLIENTS AND ONE BEDRIDDEN CLIENT IN ROOM #5. THIS LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR 2 HOSPICE CLIENTS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver not on file
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,300a month to start
Likely $3,500–$5,300
From 20 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,300a month
Likely $3,500–$5,500
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,300likely $3,500–$5,300
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 20 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,500
- $4,300
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,650
- $6,300
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 20 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
20 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$7,300.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 20 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Golden Shore Care HomeSan Jose · 0.4 mi · Small home$8,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Venetian Residential CareSan Jose · 0.6 mi · Small home$3,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- West Valley Care HomeCampbell · 1.2 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Caring Hearts Senior Care HomeSan Jose · 1.4 mi · Mid-size home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bon Homie SaratogaSaratoga · 1.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sakura Gardens VillaCampbell · 1.7 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Kimberly's Elder Kare KottageSan Jose · 2.0 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Country Style LivingSanta Clara · 2.1 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Pruneridge Residential Care Home, Facility #2San Jose · 2.1 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Princess LodgeCampbell · 2.4 mi · Mid-size home$5,700Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Mina's Elderly Care Home 3Campbell · 2.6 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Shamrock Residential Care HomeCampbell · 2.6 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bellerose Senior LivingSan Jose · 2.7 mi · Mid-size home$7,450Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Laurel LodgeSanta Clara · 2.7 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- April Garden Villa of SaratogaSaratoga · 2.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunrise Manor Residential Care HomeSanta Clara · 2.8 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Esther's Residential Care HomeCampbell · 2.8 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- College ManorSan Jose · 2.9 mi · Small home$3,700Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Mina's Elderly Care Home @ VasonaLos Gatos · 2.9 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Roxbury Elderly CareLos Gatos · 3.0 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 4078 Freed Avenue, San Jose, CA 95117Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2023, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2006. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 14, 2026.
- On file since
- 2023
- State visits
- 8
- Most recent visit
- January 14, 2026
- Occupied · February 15, 2024 visit
- 6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated February 15, 2024. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 0
- Substantiated allegations0typical 0
- Total complaints1typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2006.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 7 of 8 documents
Jan 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) David Marrufo and Simi Rai conducted an unannounced Required - 1 Year visit and met with Xi-Hua "Julia" Luo. During visit, LPAs toured the facility inside and out. LPAs toured the kitchen area and observed there to be locked storage areas for sharp objects and medications. LPAs observed the kitchen refrigerator had the following medications stored without being inside a locked container: Medications M1-M4, belonging to R1, and Medication M5, belonging to R2. LPAs observed there to be a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. During visit, LPAs toured six out of six resident bedrooms. Each bedroom had working lights and available bedding and clothing storage areas. LPAs tested the carbon monoxide and smoke detectors in the hallways and six out of six resident bedrooms and all detectors function properly when tested. LPAs toured five out of five resident bathrooms. Each bathroom had working lights and available soap and paper towels. The water temperatures in the bathroom sinks ranged from 106 F to 107 F. LPAs toured the outside areas and observed the outdoor exits were clear of obstructions. See LIC812-C page for more information. Page 1 of 2. LPAs reviewed five out of five resident records and three staff records and found them to be complete. A deficiency was cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. See LIC809-D page for more information. LPAs request that the following documents be updated and copies sent to the department by 01/21/2026: LIC500 Personnel Report LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility Liability Insurance LIC610 Emergency Disaster Plan This report was reviewed with Administrator Xi-Hua "Julia" Luo and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Page 2 of 2. END REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026
Jan 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Santino Fortes & Christine Dolores conducted an unannounced annual inspection, and met with Caregiver Licensee Yu Zhang. Licensee informed that facility has 3 staff and 6 clients. LPAs toured the facility inside out including: kitchen, living room, family room and 1 staff room, 6 resident rooms and 4 restrooms. Restrooms observed to have non-skid flooring. LPAs observed perishable food supply of at least two days and non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. Refrigerator temperature was observed at 42 degrees F and Freezer temperature was 0 Degrees F. The front yard and backyard of the facility was also inspected. There was no obstruction to block the outdoor exits. Two storage sheds were observed. Storage shed on east side of of backyard was observed to be used for storage. The west side storage shed was observed to be used as a living space by staff. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to clients in care. Room temperature was at 74 degree F, and hot water temperature was initially measured at 149.0 in the hallway bathroom and 151.1 degrees F from a resident bathroom. Licensee adjusted the water temperature during visit. The hot water temperature measured from resident bathroom at 105 degrees F and 106 degrees F in the kitchen. LPA inspected the facility first aid kit and it was observed to be complete. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. All smoke detectors functioned properly when tested. Fire extinguishers were last serviced on 7/11/24. The facility last fire drill was conducted on 3/27/24. LPA reviewed facility records for 5 staff and 6 clients. LPA reviewed 6 clients medications and centrally stored medication records and observed to be accurate . Deficiencies were cited during today's visit as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. Exit interview was conducted with Licensee. This report was reviewed and a copy was provided to Licensee for signature.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2025
Apr 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst’s Manuel Monter and Mita Partoza conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on deficiencies that were cited on a previous visit,dated January 27, 2024. LPAs met with Administrator Xi-Hua Luo and explained the purpose of the visit. On April 4, 2024, Licensing Program Analysts asked ADM to show the backyard sheds. ADM stated she does not have the keys to the sheds and could not show LPA's the inside of the sheds. LPA spoke with ADM and ADM confirmed that she would send an updated plan of correction regarding staff sleeping in the backyard sheds. During visit, LPA's observed the a section of fence in the backyard was in disrepair. ADM stated the fence in the backyard had multiple boards came loose due to the storm. ADM stated she is collaborating with her neighbor and will fix the fence as quickly as possible. This report was reviewed with Administrator (ADM) Xi-hua Luo . A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2024
Feb 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst Manuel conducted an unannounced case management visit to amend a facility evaluation report that was issued on January 27, 2024, to add additional information. LPA met with Administrator Xi-Hua Luo and explained the purpose of the visit. No deficiencies cited. A copy of the report was provided to Administrator Xi-Hua Luothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2024
Feb 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff hits resident. Staff yells at resident. Staff handles residents roughly.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the investigation finding and met with administrator (ADM) XI-HUA LUO. On 04/08/2022, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 4/14/2022, LPA conducted an initial complaint investigation visit, LPA interviewed ADM, two staff (S1, S2), and 6 residents. Residents' Physician reports, Appraisal Needs and Services Plans of residents, and admission agreement were obtained. Continued on 9099-C. Page 1 of 2. Unsubstantiated Staff hits resident. Staff yells at resident. Staff handles residents roughly: On 4/14/2022, LPA interviewed resident R1. R1 stated no one hit him/her or was rough with him/her, and no one yelled at him/her. R1 stated he/she was not aware of anyone hit or yelled at other residents. LPA interviewed resident R2, R2 denied that any staff hit or yelled at him/her. R2 stated he/she did not see or hear any staff hit or yell at residents. R2 stated staff were not treated him/her roughly. LPA checked resident R1 and R2 with ADM, there were no bruises found on R1's and R2's bodies. LPA interviewed staff S1. S1 stated he/she did not hit residents, was not rough with residents, did not yell at residents, nor did he/she see or hear staff hit residents, was rough with residents, or yelled at residents. LPA interviewed staff S2. S2 denied that he/she hit the residents, was rough with residents, or yelled at residents. S2 stated he/she did not hear or see any staff hit residents or yell at residents. S2 stated the allegations were not true. LPA interviewed ADM. ADM stated he/she did not receive any reports regarding that staff hit residents, yelled at residents, or handled residents roughly. ADM stated he/she did not see or hear these allegations. ADM stated he/she interviewed staff, and all staff denied the allegations. Based on the investigation and interviews, there was no evidence for the allegations. The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted, the Department found that the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations did or did not occur. Exit interview conducted with ADM. This report was provided for signature. A copy of this report was provided to ADM. Page 2 of 2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024 · control 26-AS-20220408121347
Jan 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator (ADM) Xi-hua Luo . During visit, LPA observed 5 residents and 2 staff. (This duplicated report is being amended, due to being created erroneously.) LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM which included; the Living room, kitchen, dining room, 6 restrooms and 5 residents bedrooms. The staff area of the facility was also inspected. Front yard and backyard were inspected. While touring the back yard, at 8:44am, LPA observed a shed, directly across from the sun room. ADM stated this is a staff room, where her staff member sleeps. ADM knocked on the shed, and a staff member with a pink robe exited. LPA interviewed staff S1. S1 stated he/she sleeps in the shed. Based on a review of the facility sketch, this shed is not part of the facility sketch. While inspecting the shed, LPA observed two cans of paint in the backside of the shed at 8:45am. While continuing the tour of the backyard, LPA observed another shed in the backyard, directly across the previous shed, at 8:45am. LPA observed staff S2 exit the shed, staff S2 stated that was his bedroom. Two day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 71 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured at 118 degrees F in resident bathrooms. Fire extinguisher was serviced in July 17, 2023. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors was tested by ADM, and were functional. LPA observed facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. The facility's last drill was on October 24, 2023. Page 1 out of 2. LPA reviewed facility records for 3 staff and 3 residents. LPA requested weight record for residents. ADM stated she used to do weigh the residents, but because they have trouble standing up, she doesn't have a weight record for those residents. The facility did not provide weight records for R1-R3. LPA reviewed 3 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. While reviewing R3's medication records, one of R3's medications was two pills short, when cross referencing the medication start date and the Medication administration record. ADM asked S3 what had occurred. S3 stated she did not know. The medication start date was January 17,2024. The MAR showed 10 medications have been administered. And an audit of the medications showed 17 tablets where in the container. ADM could not explain where the two excess pills came from. LPA conducted interviews with 2 staff (S1 to S2) and 2 residents (R1-R2). Deficiencies are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC809-D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator Xi-hua Luo and a copy of the signed report & appeal rights were provided. Page 2 out of 2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2024
Jan 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator (ADM) Xi-hua Luo . During visit, LPA observed 5 residents and 2 staff. (This report is being amended to add additional information.) LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM which included; the Living room, kitchen, dining room, 6 restrooms and 5 residents bedrooms. The staff area of the facility was also inspected. Front yard and backyard were inspected. While touring the back yard, at 8:44am, LPA observed a shed, directly across from the sun room. ADM stated this is a staff room, where her staff member sleeps. ADM knocked on the shed, and a staff member with a pink robe exited. LPA interviewed staff S1. S1 stated he/she sleeps in the shed. Based on a review of the facility sketch, this shed is not part of the facility sketch. While inspecting the shed, LPA observed two cans of paint in the backside of the shed at 8:45am. While continuing the tour of the backyard, LPA observed another shed in the backyard, directly across the previous shed, at 8:45am. LPA observed staff S2 exit the shed, staff S2 stated that was his bedroom. Two day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 71 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured at 118 degrees F in resident bathrooms. Fire extinguisher was serviced in July 17, 2023. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors was tested by ADM, and were functional. LPA observed facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. The facility's last drill was on October 24, 2023. Page 1 out of 2 LPA reviewed facility records for 3 staff and 3 residents. LPA requested weight record for residents. ADM stated she used to do weigh the residents, but because they have trouble standing up, she doesn't have a weight record for those residents. The facility did not provide weight records for R1-R3. LPA reviewed 3 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. While reviewing R3's medication records, one of R3's medications was two pills short, when cross referencing the medication start date and the Medication administration record. ADM asked S3 what had occurred. S3 stated she did not know. The medication start date was January 17,2024. The MAR showed 10 medications have been administered. And an audit of the medications showed 17 tablets where in the container. ADM could not explain where the two excess pills came from. Licensee (LN) Yu Zhang stated that that backyard sheds have locks and have been locked. LN stated the residents don't have access to them. LN stated the backyard sheds are break rooms for staff to take a break as they need. LN stated no resident stays in the sheds. LPA conducted interviews with 2 staff (S1 to S2) and 2 residents (R1-R2). This report was reviewed with Administrator (ADM) Xi-hua Luo . A copy of the report was provided. Deficiencies are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC809-D. Appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Golden Shore Care Home
San Jose · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$8,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
Ivy Park at San Tomas
San Jose · Large community · 0.5 mi away
$5,850 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Venetian Residential Care
San Jose · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$3,200 a month to start · Listed by the home
Beck Care Home
San Jose · Small home · 0.7 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Campbell Village
Campbell · Large community · 0.8 mi away
$4,200 a month to start · Listed by the home
All About Seniors Elderly Care
San Jose · Small home · 0.8 mi away
$4,450 a month to start · Covelight estimate