Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Amore Villa

Small home·Licensed for 6·Sun Valley, California

Licensed since 2022Licence #197610207Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,150 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,100
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit1 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 10, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitSeptember 2, 2025CDSS inspection record

Amore Villa is a small care home in Sun Valley — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2022.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Amore Villa

Is Amore Villa licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Amore Villa licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Amore Villa been cited?

3 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Amore Villa still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Amore Villa cost?

$4,150 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,400–$5,100. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Amore Villa take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Amore Villa LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Pacifica Hospital of the Valley is 2.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Amore Villa keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Amore Villa license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “AMORE VILLA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197610207. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Amore Villa LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 5 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 2, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 5 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 5 NONAMBULATORY AND 1 BEDRIDDEN RESIDENT. BEDRIDDEN REISDENT SHALL BE IN BEDROOM #3. APPROVED FOR 6 HOSPICE RESIDENTS.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,150a month to start

Likely $3,400–$5,100

From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,150a month

Likely $3,400–$5,300

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,150likely $3,400–$5,100

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,400–$5,300
$4,150
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,000–$8,450
$6,150
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

13 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$6,600.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 8455 Springford Dr, Sun Valley, CA 91352Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 2, 2025.

On file since
2022
State visits
10
Most recent visit
September 2, 2025
Occupied · September 10, 2024 visit
1 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated December 28, 2022 to September 10, 2024. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations3typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations5typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025110202434120231102022341

The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents

20251 state visit · 1 document
Sep 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted an annual inspection of the facility. LPA met caregiver Mary Aslanyan and explained the reason for the visit. The current census is (1). Administrator Mariya Melonyan was contacted over the phone, and she was also informed the reason of the visit. A tour of the physical plant of the inside and outside was conducted. Kitchen: The kitchen was clean and the appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; and properly stored. Knives and detergents were stored in locked drawers and cabinets. Properly labeled medications were locked in a cabinet near the kitchen. Bedrooms: There (3) bedrooms designated for residents. All bedrooms were properly furnished, with bedding and linens, as well as sufficient lighting. Bathroom: There were two bathrooms. Both bathrooms properly supplied with soap and towels, as well as functional fixtures; including grab bars. Hot water temperature 107.4 degrees Fahrenheit. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area: all areas were clean and were properly furnished. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. The outdoor area was clean and free of hazards, with furniture for clients. There is no a swimming pool in the backyard. Storage shed kept for extra supplies. All smoke alarms were tested and operating properly. The fire extinguisher was fully charged. First aide had Licensing requirements. Resident/Staff records inspected: All required documents observed in files. Medication was observed to be inaccessible and stored in a secured cabinet. There were no errors observed. No citations or deficiencies observed during visit. Exit interview and copy of report provided to caregiver.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 2, 2025
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident records were not readily available to emergency medical personnel.

Licensing Program Analysts LPA Leizl de la Cerra conducted an unannounced visit for the above noted allegation. LPA was greeted with staff caregiver, Mariana and explained the reason for the visit. Facility Administrator/Licensee, Mariya Melkonyan was contacted and arrived shortly. It was reported that on September 2, 2024, 911 was called, and emergency personnel responded to the above address for a reported resident (R1), who was unresponsive. EMTs and fire technicians arrived on scene and the facility staff #1 (S1) was unable to produce any records regarding R1's demographics, medical history, or medical wishes. During resuscitative efforts, staff did not produce an Advanced Care Directive, (DNR or Power of Attorney). The records were provided by another staff who arrived at the facility after resuscitation effort ended and R1 was determined dead. CONTINUED to LIC9099C Substantiated To investigate this complaint, LPA requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 12pm, records included but not limited to residents’ and staff roster, and R1’s facility file, including but not limited to R1’s identification information, Physician report, advanced directives, DNR, and other records. LPA de la Cerra reviewed the file between 12:30pm and 1:00pm. Staff interviews were initiated between 12:00pm and 12:30pm. A Review of R1’s resident file revealed that R1 has a signed advance directive, DNR – Do Not Resuscitate, a form previously requested by the emergency personnel. Staff interviews confirmed that S1 did not have R1’s file readily available for emergency personnel. Based on inspection, observation, interviews and record reviews, there is sufficient information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is substantiated at this time. Per CA Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiency was cited and recorded on LIC9099-D. During this investigation, LPA noted other Title 22 Deficiencies. Therefore, Case Management visit was conducted in conjunction with complaint investigation to address other deficiencies unrelated to the complaint. Exit interview was conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of report was issued to facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240903145023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87469(c)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 24, 2024

87469 Advanced Directives and Requests Regarding Resuscitative Measures (c) If a resident who has an advance directive and... on file experiences a medical emergency, facility staff shall...(1) Immediately telephone911, present the advance directive form to the responding emergency medical personnel & identify the resident as the person to whom the order refers. This requirement is not met as evidenced by, Staff failed to immediately provide advanced directive to the responding emergency medical personnel.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator will submit written statement explaining how the facility will follow the implemented policy and procedures on responding to emergency with DNR on file at the facility. Administrator will provide training to ensure cited deficiency does not reoccur. A written statement will need to be submitted to CCL/LPA by POC date.

Sep 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

This Case Management visit is conducted in conjunction with complaint investigation visit today. (Complaint 31-AS-20240903145023). The purpose of this Case Management visit is to address the deficiencies that were observed during the complaint investigation not related to the complaint. LPA de la Cerra was greeted by the staff #1 (S1) who identified herself as a caregiver for the facility. LPA explained the reason for the visit and requested the caregiver to inform the administrator about the visit. S1 provided their name and LPA de la Cerra noted that S1 did not have a criminal record clearance and association to the facility. By allowing an individual who had no criminal record clearance and/or association to the facility, to be present and work for the facility.The licensee is in violation of CCR 87355(f)(1). Therefore, the deficiency will be cited under Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, and will be recorded on LIC809D. In addition a civil penalty of (the amount) will be issued. No other immediate health and safety hazard is noted during this visit. Exit interview was conducted, appeal rights discussed. The report was signed by the administrator, and copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 11, 2024

Criminal Clearance (f) Violation of Sec. 87355(e) shall result in an immediate... civil penalties(1)Subsequent violations within a twelve (12) mo. period will result in a civil penalty ($100)a day for a max of thirty 30 days.This requirement is not met as evidenced by Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by hiring one (1) staff member on without fingerprint clearance, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024

Plan of correction: LPA requested admin to remove S1 from facility asap. Within 24 hours licensee must inform RO that S1 is removed and will not return to facility without criminal record clearance & association. Licensee will submit S1's fingerprints and associate the staff to the facility. Copy of proof will be submitted to LPA within 24 hours. Civil penalty assessed.

Sep 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident unattended. Staff did not arrange proper transportion for emergency medical services.

On 09/03/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leizl de la Cerra conducted a subsequent unannounced visit and was greeted by caregiver, Kristina Melkonyan. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. The administrator was on the phone and informed LPA that they were unavailable and gave consent to the caregiver to sign the report.At approximately 11:00am, LPA de la Cerra conducted a tour of the facility and LPA conducted interviews with the staff and the resident present at the facility Allegation: Staff left resident unattended. To investigate the allegation LPA conducted interview with caregiver, S1. It is alleged that a staff member from the facility did not attend to R1 by placing R1 in an UBER rideshare without a staff member accompanying R1 in the UBER rideshare transportation. Interview with S1 confirm that residents have never been left unattended inside or outside the facility. R1 interview confirmed that R1 has never been left unattended inside or outside the facility. Furthermore, neither resident nor administrator have any knowledge of who the unattended individual, R1 is. Based on overall investigation it was concluded that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Therefore, is deemed UNFOUNDED at this time. -CONTINUED TO LIC9099-C Unfounded Allegation: Staff did not arrange proper transportation for emergency medical services. To investigate the allegation LPA conducted interviews with one (1) out of one (1) resident who is present at the facility. LPA interviewed administrator, S1. It is alleged that a staff member from the facility placed R1 in a UBER rideshare transportation which is not a medically equipped vehicle to transport R1 to Olive View Emergency Room, Interviews with one (1) resident and one (1) staff was confirmed that UBER rideshare is not the proper form of transportation used for emergency medical services. Furthermore, neither resident nor staff member does not have any knowledge of any individual from the facility transported to Olive View Emergency by UBER rideshare. Based on overall investigation it was concluded that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Therefore, is deemed UNFOUNDED at this time. This agency had investigated the complaints and we have found that the complaints were without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaints. LPA did not observe any health and safety issues. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240517144753
Aug 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma met with Ruzanna Gevorgyan for a Required One (01) Year visit. LPA explained the reason for the visit. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at around 9:00 AM and the following was noted: There is one entrance being utilized at the facility. The facility has a total of three (03) bedrooms for residents and two (02) bathrooms. The facility is fire cleared for six (06) non-ambulatory of which two (02) may be bedridden and a hospice waiver for six (06). The facility is currently occupying two (02) residents. The facility has outdoor furniture with a covered shaded area for residents and visitors. The facility does not have a swimming pool/body of water. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins are locked away. Kitchen is sufficiently stocked with at least two (02) days perishable and seven (07) days non-perishable food. Frozen foods are wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Knives and sharps are observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The living and dining room are neat and clean. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 77°F. The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are hardwired, interconnected and observed to be operational. Fire extinguisher is located in the foyer, observed to be fully charged and last purchased on 11/24/2023. (continued on LIC 809-C) The residents' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate lighting system. Hallways are well lit. Residents have enough personal hygiene product provided by the licensee. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operations. The hot water temperature was measured at 112.4°F. Towels and washcloths are not shared. There was enough clean linen available in the cabinets. LPA observed medication and first aid kit to be locked and inaccessible to residents. No health and safety hazards noted during the visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/13/2023 at 09:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christopher Alemoh conducted an unannounced Required – Annual Continuation Inspection and met with Asst. Administrator Asya Akopyana. Two (2) residents and One (1) staff were present during this inspection. Facility is licensed to serve six (6) non-ambulatory residents, two (2) may be bedridden in any room. The facility also has an approved hospice waiver for six (6) residents. The facility currently has (One) 1 non-ambulatory resident. Two (2) residents receive Hospice services, and one (1) resident is receiving Home Health Services. The Annual Licensing Fees are current. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The home consists of 1 floor level with: 1 staff room, 3 resident rooms, 2 restrooms, kitchen, dining room, and laundry room. The assistant administrator accompanied LPA inside and outside the facility during this inspection. Outside grounds were toured and no bodies of water were observed. Walkways around the home were clear of hazards. Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. All windows have screens and Alarms due to Dementia residents. Resident bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, shower was free of mold/mildew and a non-skid mat was in place. The middle bathroom hot water temperature properly measured between 117.8-118.1F. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards, doorways were free of obstructions. (Contd from 809) LPA toured the kitchen area and observed a two-day supply of perishable and a seven-day supply of non-perishable food. Properly stored between two refrigerators across from each other. Knives and toxics were kept in a locked storage cabinet. First Aid kit was available stored next to medication. One fire extinguisher, last serviced November 13, 2023, was observed in the kitchen area second fire extinguisher was observed in the entryway. LPA tested all carbon monoxide detectors and smoke detector located in the kitchen area. Both devices were functional. LPA observed that all bedrooms and hallways are equipped with a carbon monoxide and smoke detector. Two (2) staff records were reviewed, 2 out of 2 staff records had current first aid certificates and had required criminal record clearances or criminal record exemptions. Two (2) resident records were reviewed and 2 out of 2 client records had Admission Agreements, Medical Assessments, Pre-appraisals (or Reappraisals) and/or Needs & Services Plans, and CSMD Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper documentation. An exit interview was conducted, A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and left with Assistant Administrator Asya Akopyana.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County