Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Ambassador Garden
Large community·Licensed for 158·Reseda, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$3,050 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $2,350–$3,850
- Home sizeLicensed for 158Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit70 of 158 beds occupiedApril 1, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
- Last state visitJuly 24, 2026CDSS inspection record
Ambassador Garden is a large care community in Reseda — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 158 residents since 2002. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Ambassador Garden
Is Ambassador Garden licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Ambassador Garden licensed for?
158 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Ambassador Garden been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2002, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.
Is Ambassador Garden still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Ambassador Garden cost?
$3,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,350–$3,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 121 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,094 to $5,961 a month, and the middle figure is $4,195 (n = 121 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Ambassador Garden take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Canby Retirement, Corp., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Northridge Hospital Medical Center is 1.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Ambassador Garden keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Ambassador Garden license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “AMBASSADOR GARDEN”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197603652. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 158 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Canby Retirement, Corp., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2002, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 15 state inspection visits since 2002, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2002, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
- 8 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2002, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 69 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
69 NON-AMBULATORY 1ST FLOOR ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Medicines
Level of medication service: reminders only
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
caring.com · 2026-09-09
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
Care & day-to-day support
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Assisted living
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Level of medication serviceReminders only
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Respite / short-term stays
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Medication management
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Works with hospice
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$3,050a month to start
Likely $2,350–$3,850
From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$3,050a month
Likely $2,350–$4,050
With a studio and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$3,050likely $2,350–$3,850
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $2,350–$4,050
- $3,050
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $2,900–$7,300
- $5,050
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
13 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,850–$7,800.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Northridge Valley Senior LivingNorthridge · 1.8 mi · Large community$3,065Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Savant of TarzanaTarzana · 2.0 mi · Large community$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Avantgarde Senior Living of TarzanaTarzana · 2.1 mi · Large community$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Brookdale Gardens of TarzanaTarzana · 2.2 mi · Large community$3,075Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Atria TarzanaTarzana · 2.5 mi · Large community$8,300Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Village at NorthridgeNorthridge · 2.9 mi · Large community$7,600Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Variel of Woodland HillsWoodland Hills · 3.6 mi · Large community$7,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The VeredEncino · 4.3 mi · Large community$7,500Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Aegis Living Granada HillsGranada Hills · 4.3 mi · Large community$7,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Gardens at Park BalboaVan Nuys · 4.4 mi · Large community$3,400Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Encino Terrace Senior LivingEncino · 4.4 mi · Large community$4,295Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Valley Vista Senior LivingVan Nuys · 4.9 mi · Large community$3,395Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmont Village EncinoSherman Oaks · 5.0 mi · Large community$4,975Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 7324 Canby Avenue, Reseda, CA 91335Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 16 documents for this home, and its records count 15 visits since 2002. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 13, 2026.
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 15
- Most recent visit
- July 24, 2026
- Occupied · April 1, 2026 visit
- 70 of 158 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 9 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 19, 2021 to April 1, 2026. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (8). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 9 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 1
- Substantiated allegations0typical 2
- Total complaints8typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2002.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 8 of 16 documents
Jul 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera arrived unannounced to conduct the required annual inspection, LPA and met with Administrator Sofi Druker, and the purpose for today’s visit was explained. The facility is licensed to serve 158 Ambulatory Residents ages 60 and over, of which 69 Residents may be Non-Ambulatory on the first floor. The facility has an approved Hospice Waiver on file for thirty (3) residents. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Infection Control: Facility maintains the required Infection Control Plan. Operational Requirements: Facility maintains the required liability insurance and Surety Bond that has an expiration date of 4/1/27. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: LPA toured facility, a total of 10 residents’ bedrooms/units were checked and had the required closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably available. The resident rooms have signal systems located in each bathroom that were tested an operating properly. There are smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors and an emergency sprinkler system throughout the facility that are operable and in compliance. The fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility and are fully charged. No bodies of water were observed at the facility. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. Hygiene products are readily available. The hot water temperature was tested throughout the facility resident private bathrooms and measured within the required range of 105-120 degrees. Staffing & Personnel Records-Training: There appears to be sufficient staffing at all times in the facility. Staff have criminal record clearance, current First-Aid/CPR/AED training along with training in postural supports, medication assistance, and other ongoing training are documented in personnel files. Administrator Sofi Druker certificate expires on 3/3/27. LPA reviewed 5 staff files with no issues. (Continued on LIC809-C) Resident Records-Incident Reports: Resident files are kept in a secure location and have the following documents in their files - Pre-admission appraisal/Appraisal Needs & Services Plan, Admission Agreements, Identification & Emergency Information and current Physician's Report. LPA reviewed 9 Resident files with no issues. Residents Rights-Information: Residents are provided with telephone and internet at the facility. The facility has the following posters posted on each floor/section: Residents Rights, Complaint Poster, and Ombudsman. Planned Activities: Facility provides scheduled activities with a monthly calendar and the required full-time staff that conduct and evaluate planned activities. There is sufficient space both indoor and outdoor for activities. Food Service: The kitchen was observed for the ability to prepare and serve food. LPA observed an appropriate food supply of two (2) days of perishables and one week (7 days) of non-perishables. Incidental Medical & Dental: Medication is properly labeled and are centrally stored and are in their original containers. A total of 10 Residents medications were reviewed with no issues. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has an Emergency Disaster Plan with contact numbers and at least 2 relocation sites. The last drill was conducted on 5/11/26. Residents with Special Health Needs: Facility admits residents who use oxygen and hospice services. During tour LPA observed the required sinage outside of rooms that have residents that use oxygen. There is currently 1 Resident using hospice services, LPA reviewed both facility file and hospice file with no issues observed. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code, there were no deficiencies observed during todays visit. Exit interview held and a copy of the report was provided to Administrator Sofi Druker.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 13, 2026
Apr 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility is kept free of pests. Staff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to resident.
At 10:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Huma Rahimi conducted an unannouncedinitial complaint visit. LPA met with the staff Isabella Litmanovich and the Administrator Sofi Druker was contacted and arrived shortly after. LPA disclosed the reason for the visit. At 10:10 AM, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At approximately 10:15 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. At 10:20 AM, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Physician’s report, Admission Agreement, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, Staff Training, Incontenence Care Logs, House keeping Logs, etc., relevant to the investigation. Between 10:30 AM – 2:30 PM, LPA interviewed the Administrator, two (2) staff, a housekeeper, a MedTech, and eight (8) residents. Continue on LIC 9099C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff does not ensure facility is kept free of pests. It was alleged that facility staff failed to ensure the facility was kept free of pests, specifically that on 03/25/2026, Resident #1’s (R1’s) room was filled with flies. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, a MedTech, two (2) staff, the housekeeper, and eight (8) residents, including R1. The Administrator reported that the facility contracts with Conirol Pest Control Company for monthly services and reminded residents to keep doors and windows closed and avoid leaving food out. Staff and the housekeeper reported daily routine cleaning with weekly deep cleaning and confirmed they had not observed pest activity. Residents, including R1, stated they had not seen flies or pests in their rooms or common areas and described the facility as clean and well maintained. On 04/01/2026 at 10:15 AM, during a tour of the facility, LPA did not observe any flies in resident rooms or common areas. Staff were observed performing deep cleaning throughout the facility. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, there was no evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to resident. It was alleged that facility staff failed to provide adequate care and supervision to R1 and that R1 was left without assistance after returning from the hospital on 03/25/2026. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, a MedTech, two (2) staff, and eight (8) residents, including R1. Staff reported that residents are assisted with mobility, toileting, and personal care according to their needs, monitored at least every two hours, and immediately assisted upon returning from the hospital. During the interview, R1 stated they feel safe, well cared for, and receive timely assistance with personal care, including incontinence care, typically within approximately ten (10) minutes. Residents interviewed confirmed staff generally respond promptly and no resident is left unattended. LPA reviewed R1’s Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, confirming R1 is non-ambulatory and requires assistance for incontinence. Incontinence care logs for March 2026 indicate care was provided at least four (4) times daily. On 04/01/2026 at 10:15 AM, during the facility tour, LPA observed staff providing care and timely assistance to residents. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Appeal rights explained and exit interview conducted. Copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 1, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260326094022
Jun 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in resident developing multiple pressure injuries.
At 9:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Huma Rahimi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with the staff Kristina Papazyan and the Administrator Sofi Druker was contacted and arrived shortly after. LPA disclosed the reason for the visit. An initial visit was conducted on 05/15/2025. At 10:20 AM, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At approximately 10:30 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. At 10:50 AM, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Physician’s report, Admission Agreement, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, Staff Training, etc., relevant to the investigation. Between 11:00 AM – 1:55 PM, LPA interviewed the Administrator and eight (8) residents. During today's visit, at 10:45 AM, LPA also interviewed Staff #1 (S1). Continue on LIC 9099C Unsubstantiated Staff neglect resulted in resident developing multiple pressure injuries. It is alleged that the facility staff neglected Resident #1 (R1) which resulted in developing multiple pressure wound injuries in the buttocks area with emitting pus and was not receiving home health or hospice services. To investigate this allegation LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator who denied ever retaining a resident with a prohibited health condition. The Administrator also informed LPA that R1 is receiving home health services since his/her admission to the facility and the treatment for the redness on the buttock area since 04/24/2025. However, on 05/12/2025 a small opening was observed by the facility staff on R1’s buttocks area which was immediately reported to R1’s Primary Care Physician (PCP). Subsequently, R1’s PCP advised the Administrator to take R1 to the hospital emergency room (ER) for further evaluation. On 05/13/2025, R1 was transported to ER and R1 was discharged the same day from the hospital. On 05/16/2025, LPA requested and reviewed R1’s hospital medical records and did not observe any medical information to conclude R1’s pressure wound injuries stage. The medical records indicated that R1 has a small ulceration with no necrosis or eschar. Lastly, interviews with R1 and seven (7) other residents revealed that they are happy with the care being provided by the facility staff and never felt neglected. No sufficient evidence was obtained, thus based on interviews and record review this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit Interview Conducted. A copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 9, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250514142748
Apr 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff illegally evicted resident in care. Staff did not issue refund to resident or resident's authorized representative.
At 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to the above facility. LPA met with the staff Ezabella Litmanovich and the Administrator Sofi Druker was contacted and arrived shortly after. LPA disclosed the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were made. At 9:35 AM LPA requested resident and staff roster. At 9:45 AM, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not to Admission Agreement, Physician’s Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, and etc., relevant to the investigation. At 9:55 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour. Between 10:20 AM. – 2:25 PM., LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator, two (2) MedTechs, two (2) staff, Resident #1 (R1) Physician Office Staff, R1's family, and eight (8) out of eight (8) residents. On 04/18/2025, LPA conducted a Community Care Licensing facility file review of the facility’s plan of operation for eviction procedures and policy on refunds. Continue on LIC 9099C Unsubstantiated Staff illegally evicted resident in care. It was alleged that the facility evicted Resident #1 (R1) illegally. To investigate this allegation LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator who denied the allegation. Administrator informed LPA that per R1’s family request a non-emergency ambulance was called to take R1 to the hospital on 04/07/2025. LPA was informed that R1 was not going to return to the facility and the Administrator refunded the prorated monthly payment to R1’s family. LPA contacted R1’s family member who confirmed that R1 still remains in the hospital and as of today date no discharge orders been received. Lastly, during today’s visit LPA observed that R1’s medication and other personal belongings were still present at the facility and R1’s room was still vacant. Therefore, based on interviews, record review, and LPA’s observation this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff did not issue refund to resident or resident's authorized representative. It was alleged that the facility refused to refund the full amount of $2,133 to R1's family for R1's stay at the facility from 04/04/2025 to 04/07/2025. To investigate this allegation LPA reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent facility and R1’s records. Furthermore, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator who informed LPA that upon R1's family request for a refund the Administrator contacted the corporate office to issue a check payable to R1's family in the prorated amount of $1,852.48. Lastly, the check was mailed to R1's family on 04/15/2025. Based on Safety Code 1569.652 and Assembly Bill 261 a refund is to be issued within 15 days after the personal property of a resident has been removed. Therefore, based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report was issuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250417115746
Mar 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 9:35 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Huma Rahimi, conducted an unannounced annual inspection at the facility mentioned above. LPA was greeted at the front desk by the staff Ezabella Litmanovich and later met with the Administrator, Sofi Druker, and explained the reason for the visit. Physical tour was conducted with the Administrator and LPA observed the following: The facility is a two story building with private and shared bedrooms, private bathrooms, kitchen, dining room, recreation rooms, common areas, patios, and outdoor areas. It has an approved fire clearance for 89 ambulatory residents and 69 non-ambulatory residents on the first floor only. Approved hospice waivers for 3. Elevator: The facility had one functioning elevator. LPA observed a posting for the facility’s emergency evacuation routes which was clearly labeled. Bedrooms: LPA and Administrator toured vacant and occupied bedrooms on the first and second floor. LPA observed lamps, nightstands, beds, linens, and private bathrooms with liquid soap, hand towels, and trash cans. Private bathrooms also had grab bars in the showers and around the toilets. Bathrooms: The facility currently has one public restroom on the first floor and two public restrooms on the second floor. The bathroom was sanitary with liquid soap, paper towels, handwashing instruction sign, and a trash can with a tight-fitting lid. At 9:55 AM, LPAs measured the hot water temperature on the first floor to be 120.0F and 118.9F on the second floor. Outside of the bathroom was the facility’s telephone. It is a payphone, but quarters are available free of charge at the front desk. The facility has an additional telephone on the second floor for incoming resident calls. Continue on LIC 809C Fire Safety: LPA observed that the facility has fifteen (15) fire extinguishers, and all were fully charged and last serviced on 01/21/2025. LPA observed all required postings by the front desk of the facility. The facility has fire sprinklers throughout the inside of the facility, resident bedrooms, hallways, dining room, and outdoors as well. At 1:00 p.m. LPA reviewed the most recent fire safety report from the Los Angeles Fire Department conducted on 02/17/2025. All systems were functional and passed inspection. At 1:10 p.m. LPA tested the call system in Room #115 to be functional. Staff responded to the call within thirty (30) seconds. Between 12:00 PM to 1:30 PM, LPA reviewed records of eight (8) resident and four (4) staff. Resident and staff records appeared to be complete and updated. No deficiency cited during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered. Common Areas: All floors, walls, and ceilings were clean. Furniture in the dining room, lounges, living room, and activity room were clean and in good repair. Hand sanitizer was readily available. Facility posted the most recent Community Care Licensing (CCL) Provider Information Notice at the front desk, along with recent CCL reports, an activity schedule, resident rights poster, and a confidential complaint hotline. At 10:00 AM LPA measured the room temperature to be 70 F downstairs and 73 F upstairs. Outdoor Space: LPA and Administrator toured the outside space. One gazebo was designated for resident smoking, had ashtrays, and were at least 20 feet from buildings. LPA observed two (2) locked storage sheds which contained gardening tools in parking lot area. Sufficient space was available for activities. LPA walked on the south side of the facility’s exterior and tested an exit door which was unlocked from the inside. LPA observed an electronic gate on the north side of the facility’s exterior which led to the employee parking lot. Laundry: In the back parking lot, LPA observed a laundry room with two (2) washers and two (2) dryers. Detergents were locked in a closet. Medication Room: LPA observed a locked Medication Room and met with a Med Tech who supervised and dispensed medication. Storage: LPA observed a storage room with sufficient emergency food and water supplies. LPA also observed a locked maintenance room with cleaning supplies. LPA observed an additional, locked storage room on the second floor designated for PPE. Kitchen: LPA observed menus outside of the kitchen and dining room. Menus applied to typical and diabetic diets. The kitchen floors and surfaces were clean, and all food was sealed and labeled. Cleaning supplies remained by the dishwashing area and were not stored with food. The dining room contained tables with designated seating with labels for residents with special diets. Continue on LIC 809Cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2025
Jan 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
At 2:00 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi conducted a case management visit to the facility to check on the safety and wellness of the Eaton Fire evacuated residents from Inn at the Park Ventura with the license number 197609623. LPA met with the Administrator Sofi Druker and explained the reason for the visit. LPA and the Administrator conducted a physical plant tour of the facility to ensure there are no immediate health and safety issues . LPA was informed that the residents from Inn at the Park Ventura did not move in to the above facility and LPA did not observe any evacuated residents at the time of the visit. No immediate health and safety issues were noted. No further action is necessary at this time. Exit Interview conducted. Copy of report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2025
Apr 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 10:00 AM Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Huma Rahimi, and Nicholas Reed, conducted an unannounced annual inspection at the facility mentioned above. LPAs were greeted at the front desk by the staff Ezabella Litmanovich and later met with the Administrator, Sofi Druker, and explained the reason for the visit. Physical tour was conducted with the Administrator and LPAs observed the following: The facility was last visited on 03/19/2024, for a complaint visit. The facility is a two story building with private and shared bedrooms, private bathrooms, kitchen, dining room, recreation rooms, common areas, patios, and outdoor areas. It has an approved fire clearance for 89 ambulatory residents and 69 non-ambulatory residents on the first floor only. Approved hospice waivers for 3. Elevator: The facility had one functioning elevator. LPAs observed a posting for the facility’s emergency evacuation routes which was clearly labeled. Bedrooms: LPAs and Administrator toured vacant and occupied bedrooms on the first and second floor. LPAs observed lamps, nightstands, beds, linens, and private bathrooms with liquid soap, hand towels, and trash cans. Private bathrooms also had grab bars in the showers and around the toilets. Bathrooms: The facility currently has one public restroom on the first floor and two public restrooms on the second floor. The bathroom was sanitary with liquid soap, paper towels, handwashing instruction sign, and a trash can with a tight-fitting lid. At 10:20 AM, LPAs measured the hot water temperature on the first floor to be 106.8F and 111.7F on the second floor. Outside of the bathroom was the facility’s telephone. It is a payphone, but quarters are available free of charge at the front desk. The facility has an additional telephone on the second floor for incoming resident calls. Continue on LIC 809C Common Areas: All floors, walls, and ceilings were clean. Furniture in the dining room, lounges, living room, and activity room were clean and in good repair. Hand sanitizer was readily available. Facility posted the most recent Community Care Licensing (CCL) Provider Information Notice at the front desk, along with recent CCL reports, an activity schedule, resident rights poster, and a confidential complaint hotline. At 10:35 AM LPAs measured the room temperature to be 73F. Outdoor Space: LPAs and Administrator toured the outside space. One gazebo was designated for resident smoking, had ashtrays, and were at least 20 feet from buildings. LPAs observed two (2) locked storage sheds which contained gardening tools in parking lot area. Sufficient space was available for activities. LPAs walked on the south side of the facility’s exterior and tested an exit door which was unlocked from the inside. LPAs observed an electronic gate on the north side of the facility’s exterior which led to the employee parking lot. Laundry: In the back parking lot, LPAs observed a laundry room with two (2) washers and two (2) dryers. Detergents were locked in a closet. Medication Room: LPAs observed a locked Medication Room and met with a Med Tech who supervised and dispensed medication. Med Tech informed LPAs that all residents have at least a 30 day supply of medication. Storage: LPAs observed a storage room with sufficient emergency food and water supplies. LPAs also observed a locked maintenance room with cleaning supplies. LPAs observed an additional, locked storage room on the second floor designated for PPE. Kitchen: LPAs observed menus outside of the kitchen and dining room. Menus applied to typical and diabetic diets. The kitchen floors and surfaces were clean, and all food was sealed and labeled. Cleaning supplies remained by the dishwashing area and were not stored with food. The dining room contained tables with designated seating with labels for residents with special diets. Continue on LIC 809C Fire Safety: LPAs observed that the facility has fifteen (15) fire extinguishers, and all were fully charged and last serviced on 11/29/2023. LPAs observed all required postings by the front desk of the facility. The facility has fire sprinklers throughout the inside of the facility, resident bedrooms, hallways, dining room, and outdoors as well. At 12:45 p.m. LPAs reviewed the most recent fire safety report from the Los Angeles Fire Department conducted on 12/04/2023. All systems were functional and passed inspection. At 1:00 p.m. LPAs tested the call system in Room #207 to be functional. Staff responded to the call within thirty (30) seconds. LPAs observed that one screen door was not in good repair. LPAs also observed that the fire door glass was cracked. Between 1:00 PM to 2:30 PM, LPAs reviewed records of seven (7) resident and four (4) staff. Resident and staff records appeared to be complete and updated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2024
Mar 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff yelled at resident while in care Staff did not ensure that resident received assistance while in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Sofi Drucker and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:12 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:42 AM, reviewed facility documents between 10:00 AM and 11:000 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that staff yelled at resident while in care, it was alleged that a staff yelled at Resident #1 (R1). LPA's interview with eight (8) residents or more than 10% of the current census on 09/22/23 between 10:50 AM to 11:45 AM and today between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that eight (8) out of eight (8) residents did not experience being yelled at by any staff nor witnessed any resident being yelled at by any staff. LPA's interview with the administrator today at 11:35 AM also revealed that whenever she used the public address (PA) system for general address, she has to talk loud because some of the residents are hard of hearing. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Further interviews with staff also revealed that R1 was also hard of hearing so people around R1 including staff tend to talk loudly and near R1. Regarding the allegation that staff did not ensure that residents received assistance while in care, it was alleged that whenever R1 calls via intercom, staff do not respond. LPA's interview with eight (8) residents or more than 10% of the current census on 09/22/23 between 10:50 AM to 11:45 AM and today between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that eight (8) out of eight (8) residents the staff provided all the care they need and staff are respectful and attentive. All eight (8) residents interviewed also stated that staff respond to their calls almost immediately or within ten (10) minutes. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visits, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230919091551
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
Find a detail about life at this home.
Rooms & the spaces they will use
Shared / companion roomsReported no
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Outdoor spaceGarden · Outdoor Common Areas
Garden — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Outdoor Common Areas — reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Room typesPrivate · Semi Private Studios
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Common areasFitness and wellness facilities · Indoor Common Areas
Fitness and wellness facilities — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Indoor Common Areas — reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Roll-in / accessible shower
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
AmenitiesSwimming Pool
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Salon or barber
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food
Meals provided
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Special diets supportedLow / No Sodium · No Sugar
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day
Activity types offeredActivities On-site
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Religious services at the home
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence
Residents may bring a petReported no
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved
Public transit access claimed
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Sonlema
Reseda · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$4,900 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Palace of Joy 1
Reseda · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$5,050 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Cj's Elder Home
Reseda · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$5,150 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Advertence Senior Care
Reseda · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$5,150 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Covello Homes
Reseda · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$5,200 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Harmony Home Senior Care
Reseda · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$5,950 a month to start · Covelight estimate